Why is it any of your business?

@@defenderoftheadverb why is it your business that they want to defend human rights?

Organ Farm, you've obviously missed the point of the post, perhaps deliberately. If not deliberately, please read it again with an open mind.

Apparently lesbians hate that these "autogynephiles" sign up on lesbian dating apps. They make no effort whatsoever to feminize themselves beyond the clothing, because that is not the point (not that it would help, because why the hell would it? They aren't women).

@@defenderoftheadverb Because people are sick of being pissed on and being told that it's raining.

That’s because most American media people are Democrats, and most Democrats are pro-abortion. For instance, for more than three decades, more than 95% of the journalists in the American Society if Journalists and Authors have been Democrats - a huge problem.

So true 💯

Pro murder is a great one too

i'm telling ya there is going to be a time when murderers are going to take to the streets yelling for their right to murder to be accepted and before long we are going to see scenes like in the movie "The Purge" unfolding right before our eye's. Chaos reigns supreme!!!!

@Jay Em I’ve been in the same basic scenario several times, most recently locked in debate with my brother-in-law.

@@angelalemos9811 Or pro baby-killer.

where is their death certificate? can I benefit from their life insurance policy?

Matt Walsh has argued this too. When you argue according to the rules of the framework that they build for you, you've sort of already lost - which was the point.

Or better yet man and woman since female can be for non humans if not specified

Cruelty can be so jolly sometimes, right?

Truth hurts! Deal with it.

It doesn't start with sex, it starts with bedroom etc etc. Putting aside the silliness of your reasoning, we have to cover *why* it's silly. And it's simple - sex is not smth to control or punish for. If you think otherwise, then that would be pretty hard mask off moment in terms of authoritarianism, or worse thing I won't call out because it causes meltdown in american conservative mind. More importantly, your sacred book doesn't have pwoer to put any responsibility on me, that's called wishful thinking. However, there is a very specific responsibility on me caused by havng sex, regardless of my bieliefs - choose between keeping pregnancy and aborting it. I think that's the RESPONSIBILITY in caps you were refering to.

My goodness, sir, we talk about sex all the time!

I completely agree... You would think that the mantra "my body my choice" would mean exactly that... because that's when it is your body you're dealing with, and not someone else's. "Prevention is better than 'cure' " and all that sort of things. But regulating one's own sexual consumption is not even conceivable (sorry for the unintended pun) in this culture of unbridled "freedom".

Pro Murdet?

But is it being honest?

They always go on and on about rape and incest victims. The truth is abortion due to rape or incest is 2-3% of all abortion cases. When you tell them this, they completely ignore you or start talking about something else.

Nah, my argument is I want a woman to be able to choose. Period.

@@marcihf217 Even if we were to concede that abortions in cases of rape and incest would make sense this would obviously not extend to 15+ weeks. Definitely not to late term abortions which they also argue for. Because a woman who has been sexually assaulted or is the victim of incest would know that she's pregnant before the last few weeks of pregnancy which means she could have reasonably made that decision sooner. So, if we were to come up with abortion schemes on a state-by-state level in the U.S. this would mean that we would simply make exceptions early in pregnancy for abortions in those cases or simply have an very early pregnancy time cutoff. It wouldn't mean that all cases that involve a woman's choice to have an abortion should be accepted. For example, we would also expect that a person who is a victim of incest who wishes to have abortions between 7 and 9 months be able to talk about the reason so that justice might be done. We could even say in cases of rapes or incest a person who has been able to prove that happened should be granted a court order for an abortion. These are things reasonable and sane people can talk about and work out on a state-by-state basis. What we should not allow to happen is for someone who clearly wasn't the victim of rape or incest to use that as an argument for abortion up to birth because this is as predatory as the person who did that to a victim. For a woman who wasn't sexually assaulted who is in week 30 to say that abortion should be available in week 30 because of rape and incest is sick and twisted. She has no problem using the tragedy and trauma someone else experienced to act as cover for her delayed decision.

@@bebravebestrongbetrue7420 100% You make a lot of good points.

@@Rojofro yeah I hear ya, but surely theres a limit to choosing

I know right? Who knew they also provided life saving care to trans people. Puberty blockers and gender reassignment surgery decrease the rate of suicidality in trans patients. 🥰

@@paytonsmith8358 trans surgeries have only helped increase the number of suicides but sure keep telling yourself that to cope A prayer for the souls of the lost and confused truly is needed

This is mostly inaccurate though. Most people that are pro-choice are not pro-abortion

It is really pro-death. Pro-choice implies they are looking at alternatives which often isn't the case. The Baby does not get a choice. Their mother has made them a slave. Your rights as a baby don't matter only your mother's rights. Well mom isn't always being presented with what the pros and cons are if they decide to kill their baby. How much torture. Quick or slow very painful death?

@@bethq1703 Totally agree Beth! It's almost a death cult with these people. Have you watched the movie "unplanned?" It actually shows via ultrasound the poor, innocent little baby's leg being suctioned off, baby goes nuts. Well, who wouldn't? Yet the argument has always been the baby doesn't feel anything, like heck they don't! Other movie I've used successfully to wake some of these people up is the movie starring Dean Cain "Gosnell." Abortion is a sick, demented and murderous practice!

@@albertfralinger2711 Thanks for your comment Albert. Is one pro-choice or pro-abortion? Test them out Albert, this is how I do it, thus far they've all shown their hand as really pro-abortion. Try this.... "As a pro-life person I'll tell you what; I'll give you the outlier cases, an abortion is fine for rape/incest etc. (because that's where they, so-called pro-choice people ALWAYS go), will you then concede that the other 300,000 plus (in the U.S.) abortions in the U.S. are unnecessary and thus shouldn't be allowed?" Now you'll find out their true motives. This is where they show themselves, usually they become adamant for abortion. And when they shift their position (always do that when they've lost the argument) to "it's a woman's right to do to their body, My Body, My Choice" mantra. Then I say to them "okay, I agree, you decide for your own body, no argument. Now, using your own argument answer me this; is the mom's and baby's DNA an IDENTICAL match? If it's the mom's OWN BODY, it will match, so does it?" We all know the answer. Of course, the DNA doesn't match, why? It's a separate person! It's NOT the mom's own body. If they are not screaming at you at this point, but actually listening and thinking, I then say; "when did being a mom with the gift of bringing a new and precious life into the world become a bad thing? Being a parent can be the highest of callings and bring moms and dads the greatest fulfillment in life. Why is that a bad thing?" Try it Albert, let me know how it goes.

@@coolgranddad5430 What is wrong with being pro-abortion? I am pro a woman deciding what is allowed to grow in her body and use her resources. I thought conservatives were of the "don't tread on me" government movement that said that those in politics should have no say in our own liberties?

True

Thats what puberty blockers are for, my guy. you cant just undo puberty. If they are really trans, then transitioning before puberty leads to better passing as their gender. Its a lot easier to have never had boobs than to have them surgically removed after, for instance. Let kids go through thorough psychological evaluation while on puberty blockers and then let then, when they figure out if they really are trans or not, they can transition or stop taking puberty blockers and proceed to their gender naturally.

Comparing an enslaved human being to a woman deciding to terminate a cluster of cells is next level, even for the anti-choice movement. Women should never be required by the government to carry a pregnancy unless they have the desire to do so. Anything less is advocating for forced birth, a literal crime against humanity.

Aleichem

Law can't change what marriage is. That's like passing a law that says a potato is a carrot. Just because we say that's what it is doesn't make it so.

@@divinecomedian2 you're incorrect. Marriage is a legal act in our society. It may have begun as a religious one, but it is no longer. You can still celebrate it as religious, but it is indeed a legal act. Marriage is literally a legal union between to people. Gay, straight or sideways it's all the same.

That’s not true. Most pregnancy clinics that help pregnant mothers and mothers with young children are run by pro-lifers, as are women’s shelters and other charities. Meanwhile, the pro-choice side is content with killing the child and then letting the mother continue on with whatever issues drove her to abortion. Jesus is against killing innocent human beings, so yes.

@@bigfootapologetics One-sided a bit aren't you? Our side is all susnshine and smiles and the other is all about murder, coercion and hate. There are many "pro life" clinics that take women who have made a decision to have an abortion and talk them into adoption or having the baby. I'm sure that's justified because it is something you think the mythical "Jesus" would want. Women should make their own decisions. Because you don't agree with abortion doesn't give you the right to coerce women to make the decision you would choose. Do you think woman want to be shelters and using charities? Do you think they want to be dependent on other people to raise a child they don't want? What kind of life is that for a woman and her child? And how long do these "charities" help the woman and her child? Children are forever. Do you support them forever or just until they have the baby you think should be born? Pro baby, not pro life. Definitely not pro mother.

@@queent3343 Killing innocent human beings is a one-sided issue, so yes, I’m on the side that doesn’t try to justify murder. You don’t have to believe in Jesus to believe killing is wrong. Pro-lifers haven’t been the ones burning down those charities and clinics, which are designed to actually help women and children (rather than kill the children and send the women back off into whatever mess got them there to begin with). If they convince a woman not to murder her own child, usually by offering financial support or a loving family to adopt the kid, why is that a bad thing? Are pro-choicers only pro-choice if the choice is killing? Why is Planned Parenthood shutting down in states banning abortion if they (and other pro-choice clinics) help mothers and children? You’re right that a child is forever. Once a child is conceived, the parents are parents forever. The question is whether or not they want to kill their child (which is also forever, a permanent denial of life and all human rights) or, at bare minimum, give that child to one of the many loving families on the adoption waitlist so that child can live a happy life.

How is the "Pope who masquerades as God's representative on earth", Mary as Queen of Heaven and moving the Sabbath to Sunday "deceptive"? And why did you feel the need to comment on such matters? How do they relate to the topic of this video? Do you frequently go off topic like this?

@@vinceschenden7349 Does the truth matter to you Vince? Are you aware of the apostacy of the RC Church?

@@chookin1 The Truth is really all that matters in the end, Jason. Plz offer examples of the Church's apostasy--give several. Plz dont offer sweeping generalizations--give several examples.

@@vinceschenden7349 How about Mary worship...changing the Sabbath....papal infallability... altering the Ten Commandments.....placing the church ABOVE the bible.....thats just for starters

@@vinceschenden7349 Several popes have said dont go to Jesus, come to me. Also this current apostate is a Jesuit....the papal assassins. Read the Jesuit oath and tell me this isnt from the mouth of Satan.

If abortion were outlawed, do you think PP would stay in business? Well maybe, since they receive ridiculous sums of taxpayer dollars.

@@divinecomedian2 I hope so. Women and sometimes men who don't have money take advantage of their services. I also hope abortion is never outlawed. That would be a sad sad day

I agree, killing your child is certainly a choice.

In a morally relativistic world where it is "to each his own" or each is the free to make whatever choice he desires I can see how your "how would you like it" argument would hold water. However... Abortion is a human rights violation Eating meat is ethical So the two are not equivalent

Let me put it this way, since you are here...and who knows...maybe you're a Catholic...or some Protestant denomination. First...most if not all here who view this channel believe in the existence of God. Now, since we believe in God, we believe that he came to earth in a form of a human being. While in the womb he was not partial God or a zygote-God so to speak...he was full God as he was full human being in that womb.

@@kyler9323 no, eating meat when we have an alternative is not ethical or just. It is the unnecessary destruction of a life. I've seen rescued cows that would've been slaughtered and eaten come when their names were called. Can anyone say that about a five week old clump of cells? Late term abortion is one thing, but that is a different story.

@@rumrunner8019 A child recently born doesn't know its name either...so I guess it's also as worthless as a five week old clump of cells. In fact a child doesn't really have much response or is cognizant of much or its surroundings months after it's born. It just lies there helpless. I suppose until it comprehends its own name we can attach value and worth? In terms of hierarchy of importance in that case, then definitely a cow is worth more care and concern. Definitely, have your priorities in alignment. You would think that one who 'CARES' so much about "the unnecessary destruction" of life and his fellow animals he would at least extend that courtesy to those within their own species. Oh the irony of the vegans...

@@rasecphd People get abortions because of many reasons but the biggest being there is no viable alternative. You had an alternative to eating the flesh of a poor, innocent animal that suffered and died. You could have eaten any countless numbers of cruelty free foods. And again, let a vegan pass flyers and pamphlets at grocery stores the way anti-abortion people pass pamphlets at Planned Parenthood. You would be screaming "harassment" and calling the police.

Your comment shows a little bit that you dont understand that we are in a spiritual battle.

@@philippbosnjak4183 oh I know we are in a spiritual battle. I just think being kind, compassionate, patient, and attentive are better ways to approach this complicated and nuanced problem than brow beating each other and being decidedly un-Christ like in our conduct.

@@jimisoulman6021 I get what you mean though I would say being nice has never really converted anyone Padre Pio once said he doesnt give a sweet to those who need a purgative so I think its okay to show strength against evil appearing to be good.

@@philippbosnjak4183 the problem is this is a complex issue being shoe horned by some basic principles and it does not work - at least for me. The basic principles are sound - sanctity of life and no infanticide. However applying them to pregnancy is problematic at best from my point of view. There is a qualitative difference between a zygote, an embryo, and an infant. So there is scope there for discussion but closer and closer to term seems more and more wrong. This issue is further muddied by the simple fact that we do not honour the sanctity of life in other ways. Post partum care in the US for those who can't afford it is not good or systematic. And if life were so sacred why are our hands drenched in blood from supporting and initiating wars all over the world. This inconsistency really bothers me. Finally...it's ok to be "pro life" and practice it in your family. But to impose it on other people who do not believe what we believe is wrong. It's the first step towards theocracy and that's not an appealing prospect. Especially since as aforesaid this matter is complex. God gave us all free will and while we choose to exercise it in one way others do not and to try control the free will of others in such a deeply private matter does not seem Christ like. We can try convince them through discussions and debates but to use legal force to compel them to change their minds is counter productive and unethical. So the fact that's Pints is being so belligerent on the apparent success on this deeply contested and private issue is un-Christ like and just unappealing to me. Bring back Mother Natalia and discuss God's grace and mercy through the filokalia.

@@jimisoulman6021 Embryo and zygote etc just describe different stages of life. But you dont become a human being you are such that why we say its wrong. 2. If a society doesnt know what is good and what evil it is not a surprise that things like war will become common. Russia has had a righ rate of abortions and was the first country to allow them up to 9 months and Ukraine has the highest number of women who get paid for delivering babies for other people. So I dont think it is a coincidence that there is a war now. 3. We do not impose anything on society. The goal is to build a just society where especially the weak are protected like babies elderlies and ill. Impose that is for me celebrating a month of sexuality and colouring everything in rainbow jjst for social acceptance and if you dont a agree you get insulted a bigot. But I agree it is much more complicated.

What kind of “choices”? Life or Death choices only. Please stop lying yourself if there is other then those two choices. Because you make a choice that convenient to your desire to de membrane a baby still is pro death. Rape and emergency cases are less than 2% of the abortion cases. Truth is hurt.

@@hiuszenoom809 well, my choices were between prochoice and unhinged, and that's not hard to pick there. Sorry, as much as you may dislike it, that's the truth. I know it's convinient to lie to yourself that your faith is the greatest and that gives you right over other people, but that's just uncivilized. And trying to revert society back to cave is hardly a cause worth tainting the truth, if there ever even was such a cause. I'm glad you're aware of existence of those rare cases, without me having to remind you. That means that even by your outright deathcult standards there are cases in which abortion is acceptable, so maybe there is hope for you.

Killing children in the womb is "moral"? No thanks

@@divinecomedian2 you're free not to do it

She had a choice before she had sex. Murder is not much of an option.

I agree, I wouldn't use the "pro-death" term but reasons different than you. I wouldn't use it because it is unhelpfully inflammatory. Are they pro-abortion? Pro-infanticide? Pro-killing just anyone? I'm fine with pro-feticide or pro-abortion or pro-murder of pre-born children. The whole "choice" part of it is irrelevant. No one says "I'm pro-marijuana choice" or "I'm pro-choice" when speaking about whether it should be legal to consume marijuana. They say "I'm pro-marijuana" and then they might qualify it and say whether they see it as a necessary evil or a positive good etc. but that is the label.

The word fetus is a nebulous term used to describe any number of life forms before birth. Pro abortionists will project the notion the birth mother has the right to choose what to do with her own body yet the unborn baby is not a clone of her dna, it has it's own unique dna and that is what makes abortion the willful murder of an unborn child.

There are some people who aren't able to understand what "love" is. These are the same people who would claim that Jesus wasn't loving because he didn't always talk about sensitive topics in what would have been a religiously or politically correct way. The fact that you felt "insulted" or weren't "prepared to be insulted" is on you and no one else. Going through life in the false belief that you can't be offended. Also, they didn't make this video to be insulted nor were they prepared for you to to insult them but unlike you i suspect they are able to see it's not something they need to worry about. Maybe you should spend more time learning how to love instead of telling other people they aren't loving because they don't think love is the hateful thing you call love.

@@bebravebestrongbetrue7420 Um, okay. I said I was insulted, not offended. And I've said my peace. Either you'll make an attempt to understand what I say and where I come from, or you'll decide it doesn't matter and cling on to that cop out

@@bebravebestrongbetrue7420 I guess I lied, I definitely have more to say. The fact that I was insulted wasn't on me, I'm not the one who decided to insult myself. It's being offended that I'm in control of, and I'm not offended, I focus more on the spirits that are driving people than I do the person. It's also up to the people who are representing God to attempt to communicate in a respectful way that will actually get people to listen. They communicate in a way that purposely offends people. They literally make no attempt to reach those that they consider lost, so what is even the point of this video?

@@bebravebestrongbetrue7420 sorry for the scattered comments, using down time at work. I also want to address that I'm not just complaining because I was insulted. I'm literally trying to do my part for the kingdom of God

@Donkey Kong unfortunately. I promise they do a poor job of representing God.