Double Integrals by Fubini

Рет қаралды 6,029

Prime Newtons

3 ай бұрын

In this video, I showed how to compute double integrals by Fubini's Theorem

Пікірлер: 25

@abhishankpaul 3 ай бұрын

Please keep the intro as it was. No need to make it as an outro

@J.B.L2227 3 ай бұрын

Yeah I agree the intro was perfect. no need to change

@jalilhamediniya7111 3 ай бұрын

Thank you so much. You teach math incredibly! I am from Iran and I love mathematics. God bless you master.🌹🌷🌺🙏

@Vikingman2024 5 күн бұрын

Excellent video! Thank you!

@davidgagen9856 3 ай бұрын

What a brilliant explanation.

@ryoji4200 3 ай бұрын

Awesome video. Thank you so much!

@Jason-ot6jv 3 ай бұрын

I cant wait for you to do triple integrals next!!!

@vestieee5098 3 ай бұрын

What are the conditions for Fubini to hold true (when does it fail)? Is it being finite the only condition? Great video as always :)

@peterlee5916 3 ай бұрын

Great job sir! Could you please solve more double or even triple integrals on this channel?

@user-yd4ky5vb3w 3 ай бұрын

Thanks for an other video master

@aiersentayier6511 3 ай бұрын

Great !!🤖!!

@SakshamMahajanB 3 ай бұрын

Nice 🤠

@Moj94 3 ай бұрын

Nice

@pojuantsalo3475 3 ай бұрын

At least this was easy for me after the struggles with the floor function equation problem.

@Lux7777777 3 ай бұрын

Nice :)

@J.B.L2227 3 ай бұрын

Hey, do you do physics too?

@Audio_n_Songs_n_Movies 3 ай бұрын

Sir when we derivatives a function then we determine the slope of the function in any point. And when we integrate a function then we determine the area of the function in any interval. So, if integration is inverse of derivative. Then can I say tangent is the inverse of area???

@gp-ht7ug 3 ай бұрын

Hello, when you have got time, could you prepare some videos about Feynman technique of integration? Thanks

@okmotivated4786 3 ай бұрын

Brother can you please solve this question: If last three digits of x⁴ are (x-58)² then the last digit of x is

@PrimeNewtons 3 ай бұрын

Let me look at it. No guarantees but it looks possible.

@JSSTyger 3 ай бұрын

I got the answer wrong because when you have R = [0,2]x[0,3] I thought the [0,2] was for y and [0,3] was for x. Don't ask me why. But strangely enough, my answer was very similar. It was (1/3)(5+e^(-6))