Exactly, does he have marbles in his mouth? It's Vul-ner-a-ble! driving me crazy.
@dmairplus4 жыл бұрын
New t shirt idea
@raymondlarsen60264 жыл бұрын
I was like someone’s gonna rip him for this
@shroey203 жыл бұрын
You beat me to it by four years
@brdobu11573 жыл бұрын
Paused the video after he said it the second time and came to find this comment lol. After the first time I just assumed I mis-heard, cus I'm like "no way he slaughtered it THAT bad!". But yeah, he did
@stanostup8 жыл бұрын
The story behind this is a little bit more complex. Hellmuth knew, that Matusow had only one bullet for this session and he exploited that, he just did not want to go broke in this hand. Very simple case of being money-scared.
@KyleParzich8 жыл бұрын
Yep he says this later in the season. Basically this is a classic example of what can happen if you're playing on scared money.
@ww20794 жыл бұрын
A little more complex lol. Stop making excuses for Mike, he's a tight bad player honestly. If you had one bullet you should be jamming the kings. He played like a bad nit as usual.
@millhousemillard21403 жыл бұрын
@@ww2079 matusow can be very spewey and if you watch him you would know about the infamous matusow blow ups of the past lol
@nikoniko9193 жыл бұрын
@@millhousemillard2140 I was so happy that Matusow lost thathand. I have position on the fish hahaha If i was Phil i would said who is the fish now 😅😅😅
@pross19868 жыл бұрын
7:35 I love how laak has 500$ ready :D
@JoeHard867 жыл бұрын
Although Doug did a great job of breaking down this vid. The most important part of this is that Mike is not only playing with scared money, he's usually playing with other people's money! He laid those kings down because he was broke and didnt want to have to leave the game! Playing in games that YOU can comfortably buy into is very important!
@BLUFFIRL8 жыл бұрын
this fold made my eyes bleed
@BLUFFIRL8 жыл бұрын
what did you do
@jhonjohnjonjondoe50117 жыл бұрын
lmfao
@markkelso8718 жыл бұрын
Shocked you didn't comment on the fact that Hellmuth knew Mike was on one bullet for the cash game. Absolutely critical information here IMO.
@markkelso8718 жыл бұрын
also, and definitely less important, I think it might be worth tossing in A6 of diamonds in some of mikes hands as played... definite check on the flop, definite call/raise on turn and definite decision albeit more incredibly weighted to calling on river (given their perceived history as mike talks about..."he can only have it if he makes the big bet", "2 outtered me" etc) than KK but still worthy of a small tank in his eyes.
@s0nd3rrz738 жыл бұрын
+Mark Kelso He's not opening A6 then called a 3 bet from Helmuth who is tight
@6thwilbury23318 жыл бұрын
Not only that, but Matusow knew that Hellmuth knew about the single bullet PLUS this was a televised hand. That latter point may not seem like much of a factor today but back when this aired, TV time was a huge commodity - both monetarily and ego-wise - for both of these guys. Finally, both Matusow and Hellmuth separately cited the one-bullet buy-in as a reason for their respective plays in subsequent interviews. All in all, this hand had some circumstances so extraordinary that they border on unique.
@buqquna8 жыл бұрын
he only has 100 k to gamble with, so if he losses the 100k ( bullet number 1 :P ) he has no more bullets ! ( money ) to keep his seat in the game
@RealtorConnorBranch8 жыл бұрын
Wow.. It's insanely cool to see such complex thought processes from one of the best in the world. I wish I could always think this way when I'm in a hand.
@Lukev118 жыл бұрын
Love these videos, keep up the great content Doug
@6thwilbury23318 жыл бұрын
+1
@earsonlyaudio8874 жыл бұрын
I got to talk to Mike about this hand in 2009. He told me he folded because he was on his only buy in. He also told me Phil knew it was his only buy in, which to me, makes this an easier call because it becomes more obvious that Phil wants a fold.
@williamzagarella80662 жыл бұрын
Lmao you talked to mike 🤣. Dude, Mike said this later in the season. Exactly those words. You're not fooling anybody lmao. Plus theres a comment literally RIGHT ABOVE YOURS THAT YOU OBVIOUSLY SAW, and just copied it LMAO. Who tf are you dude lmao
@EGarrett0111 ай бұрын
This is a legendary hand. Everything about it hits. Matusow's talking and showing his cards, the fact that it was Hellmuth bluffing, the reactions of the other guys at the table, the commentary by Gabe ("turns the Kings over, throws 'em away, and here it comes!"). Just perfect.
@ight_of_heart8 жыл бұрын
Such great content. Doug is a living legend and a great professional, an inspiration for us all.
@Monki028 жыл бұрын
Hey Doug, not sure if you read these but I'm absolutely loving this series! Fantastic idea and really great to hear all of your insight. Keep up the good work, I'm really enjoying it.
@BoooYa_Poker7 жыл бұрын
love Antonio's constant needles and people don't even see hes needling them lol
@heavyonthemustardplz4 жыл бұрын
Glad to see these old videos are back!
@user-fq8tc1gr5c7 жыл бұрын
Thank you alot Doug for all your work ! I watch all your videos with total attention and concentration. Your videos give me a much confidience and skill level in my game) Thank you !!! God bless you)
@chrisfromcapebreton85388 жыл бұрын
I think after this hand Phil said that he knew Mike only had one bullet for the game.
@corydudley24693 жыл бұрын
He absolutely did make the statement
@badleech8 жыл бұрын
Great videos, really interesting to hear your view on those "classic" hands.
@diowk8 жыл бұрын
@6:39 vurnerable? lol Thought this was a brain fart then he said it again a couple seconds later. Seriously Doug? Vurnerable?
@bagnatofurniture3887 жыл бұрын
The turn analysis is what has me so interested in poker again....i love all the layers of detail and doug presents it so effortlessly. This is why it makes me laugh when danielle negreneau aka ManChildPoker says jCarver is tops on twitch...only by audience..for now...Doug is immensely more erudite has better elocution and way more affable. Your pal, Mao
@kevinducharme39888 жыл бұрын
I love how every commentator is automatically a poker pro when they can see everyone's hands. Meanwhile, Doug is a great player that I played against online, and he is completely right on everything he said. basically, bad fold by matusow's point, relying too much on reputation vs the current situation. Best rule of poker is to forget about any previous hands and focus on the one you have. Too many people remember the big losses vs the wins. Which is exactly what happened here. Gutsy out of character playing by Phil and his "reputation' caused Mike to fold a hand because of the past, not the moment.
@christophergraff66838 жыл бұрын
How many R's in the Word vulnerable ?? Oh & its Skeletons in the closet & Monsters Under the bed . good work tho
@thomash52398 жыл бұрын
Can you please review Antonius vs Lederer AA vs AA
@mobinhan8 жыл бұрын
I did a simular bad fold with kings. Now i understand better what i did wrong. Great video, many thanks!
@DonkeyKongBMAC7 жыл бұрын
Antonio wearing an Ed Hardy shirt.
@wylde6784 жыл бұрын
Well, he is Persian.
@thomash52398 жыл бұрын
Matusow's not only "out of it" in this hand, he's "out of it" in general if you read his support for Trump on twitter
@gudenseieg8 жыл бұрын
yeah i noticed that myself. So I had to unfollow him on twitter
@mirdok8 жыл бұрын
Best series ever. Keep it up.
@jcgriffin45728 жыл бұрын
seems like scared money situation
@TheBoldImperator7 жыл бұрын
It was like 2008 dude, no chance in hell Matusow opens from EP with 86s. And he seems "out of it" because he's doped up on mood stabilizers (I think Depakote when this was filmed) and antideps. They screw with logical processes. Matusow made a lot of questionable decisions during this season, even by his own standards.
@santiagopena74398 жыл бұрын
The first channel i subscribe and The first coment i do , really good channel, very interesting and funny thanks doug
@boenz38688 жыл бұрын
But doug my reads and instincts...... LOL at the needle at the end "broke dummy"
@BadgerSportsService8 жыл бұрын
Something that wasn't talked about is this was early in the session and Mike only had one bullet. I'm sure he didn't want to go broke this early in the session so he played scared with this hand.
@cassurai8 жыл бұрын
great great analysis
@JohnSmith-cy8hq8 жыл бұрын
I kept hearing Massuw
@crulio3 жыл бұрын
Cool Ed Hardy shirt Antonio
@outlaw62618 жыл бұрын
pls more hands! u are even better than The Poker Guys although they are really good and entertaining!
@jolaz697 жыл бұрын
Matusow folded because he believes he's unlucky at poker when in reality he's not very good.
@Dreamagain112 жыл бұрын
on the flip side let's say phil has AQ and is value betting. What is he getting value from? KQs? Basically just KQs right? Which depending on your suits, much of KQs might be blocked.
@JoeZBoardz8 жыл бұрын
Who supplies you with hair gel?
@ricardofcj7 жыл бұрын
Alright. I don't really comment on that, but this I gotta ask, Doug. You mentioned that Phil is pretty tight, and that is true for what we can see on the internet. You also mentioned that we sometimes should forget about reads that we have on some specific players and go for their range and pos flop play. So, my question is, considering Phil Helmut's 3betting range against the UTG player, which I believe is something like [AK,AQ,AA,KK,QQ,JJ], if Phil is not bluffing too much, and we know that he's NOT, so Matusow is really only beating AQ from Helmut's value range. Don't you think that overall this is actually a pretty good fold? Even though his hand is disguised, He blocks AK and pocket kings, so that can't be that many hands that he beats on Phil's range at this board/river. Except, of course, 72! lol
@fsimpro5 жыл бұрын
where is the link for the hand with eastgate? cant find it on your profile
@you1209998 жыл бұрын
great video
@shivasirons61593 жыл бұрын
The best part of this is that right before this hand mike said that " phil is the biggest fish"
@Yellowswift37 жыл бұрын
Good video, Doug. :)
@shivasirons61593 жыл бұрын
2:00. But doug the thing is ,even if you get $500 from each player , the pot is usually tens of thousands so i think it,s the pride factor waay more than the money.
@bagnatofurniture3887 жыл бұрын
Matusow's hand was shaking at the end....as he fidgeted going back and forth to chips and cards. You could see the physical manifestation of his vacillation.
@LM-ys8kr3 жыл бұрын
Yeah I agree not to play with scared money but I have seen Mike play well on many occasions. They usually only show him when things are going bad 4 him.
@mtgoxsucks4352 жыл бұрын
Here’s how to play the 7/2 game… cheerfully throw money at anyone who wants to go to the mat with 72. From there, play a normal game and you will more than get back whatever money you had to pay to people.
@burhanhanif43207 жыл бұрын
idk Dougie, first of all love your channel. it is really interesting and also addictive and distracts me from from my math studying. About the hand Mike played it so awful i personally think it was a set up for like tv audience. Second there is no instance or position anywhere on all of the 5 streaks that mike should fold. Actually he could raise or shove the river 99 times out of a hundred and win. But your awesome but i would like too see you analyse the hand between Dwan and Melzer on HSP season whatever when he made the call on the river with Kings. I am still confused about that hand.
@corydudley24693 жыл бұрын
One thing you are forgetting Doug. Phil knew that Mike only had 1 bullet in this game if I recall correctly. That is huge in Phil's play and Mike's decision.
@corydudley24693 жыл бұрын
Just to be clear I did not read any of the previous comments. Stanislov had already stated this fact. Know ALL the info before you come to your conclusions on why who did what. I love your channel and appreciate your insight. But know all the details before passing your judgement on another pro players play. JS
@jordananon6788 жыл бұрын
Can someone explain Doug's comment at the end about needing to continue about 55% of the time to not allow someone to bluff when they bet 40k into 50k?? I thought at this sizing because we'd be getting more than 2 to 1 on a call we only have to have the best hand (continue) 33% of the time to be profitable??
@RealtorConnorBranch8 жыл бұрын
This is what I thought as well.
@tomrevello30608 жыл бұрын
Both Doug and you are correct. From Hellmuth's perspective, Mike needs to fold around 55+% of the time for his bluff to be profitable. From Mike's perspective, a call has to be right around 30% of the time to be profitable.
@joshuathomas65128 жыл бұрын
For Phil to need Mike to fold even 50% of the time to be breakeven, he'd have to bet the pot. He only bet 80% pot. 55% is a ludicrous number. I have no idea where Doug's 55% number comes from.
@lessmore82588 жыл бұрын
You're mixing up some math. If you're bluffing, the formula to calculate how often you're bluff needs to work in order to break even is bet/(bet+pot). In this case it's 40,000/(40,000+49,100), which equals 44.89%. The amount the player bluff catching needs to continue with is 1-(bet/(bet+pot)), in this case 1-(40,000/(40,000+49,100)), or 55.1%. The part you're mixing it up with is how often the bluff catcher needs to be right, and therefore how much the bluffer needs to be bluffing. This formula is bet/(pot+2bet). In this example, 40,000/(89100+(2*40000)), which is 31% So the bluff catching player has to continue 55% of the time against a player who will bluffing 31% of the time in order for both bluff catchers and bluffs to breakeven.
@mathewi27618 жыл бұрын
Why Mike could only have 88, 86 in his value range after calling 3bet utg? He could also flat qq, jj, tt, 99 and he could easily check flop call turn with the intention raise or bet river.( at least some times, especially with his stack size)There is nothing to be afraid of on such flop(4 outs max).
@josephback-upaccount61168 жыл бұрын
Doug, you're hair has never looked better than in this video. Secret?
@Bella-hs2ew4 жыл бұрын
Doug is hair?
@kevinmyers4403 жыл бұрын
@@Bella-hs2ew jesus christ you must've been bored when you policed this grammar. Loser.
@jbs89588 жыл бұрын
There is so much bad play on that programme if you watch it back. I wonder if they played that way just to generate action after it aired.
@babyjesusdrums29287 жыл бұрын
What is vurnerable?
@wirebug423 жыл бұрын
I feel like I gotta be missing something here. Why is 10,9 never mentioned as a hand that Phil is repping? Is 10,9 suited just never going to take that line pre-flop? Seems like a real chance at that hand once he checks the flop(somewhat trapping the draw?) and raises the 8 on the turn, which wouldve hit the straight for him. If I was Mike, I feel like the only reason I fold is because i think he has the straight Maybe I just play 10,9(s) way too much tho..?🤷🏼♂️😂
@zZmiLLi3 жыл бұрын
IMO....I think after Matusow raises before the flop and a re-raise by Phil and a call from Matusow, we can pretty confidently rule out a 9 10, especially from 2 relatively tight players.
@MrAndersonmm7 жыл бұрын
This is a combination of Hellmuth having a super tight/trappy reputation (and playing up to that reputation with his line) and Matusow being on scared money. He was on one bullet, and I know in other seasons he actually had sold big chunks of his action, maybe even been staked in the game, by others. Matusow was (is?) a very good player, but his bankroll management, especially at this time with FT still going and him blowing his roll on online poker every other week, he really shouldn't have been playing nearly this big. I've played on scared money before, and I can say from experience that there's always an opportunity for someone bluff you off of even your biggest hands if they take the right line.
@andrewwebber4214 жыл бұрын
Yes but it’s also an example of the dangers of getting too obsessed with reads on individual players rather than understanding and sticking to proper poker strategy. For Polk this is an auto call, so even in a money scared position he’d do it. Rather than using some odd “read” justification to support your fear, if you rely on the read too much you can start seeing demons in any situation when fear enters the equation. Mike had effectively been trapping so had a hand that could beat hands value betting.
@percyblok60143 жыл бұрын
So fk'n BOSS.
@18000rpm8 жыл бұрын
Love your videos Doug but sorry you're completely off on this one. Mike even said 'turns a 2-outer on me' and then folds the kings. You're over analyzing way too much when it's simply 2 nits playing straightforward lines and thinking (not saying they're not good players but in this case they were both playing straightforward lines).
@575forza Жыл бұрын
1,000,000% a call. Beats like 80% of the value bets and the counterfeit. The real reason he didn’t call was because he only brought one buyin to the game. That’s it. He mentions it later in the ep. otherwise that’s a call every time.
@mikegallegos77 жыл бұрын
I think Matusow was mimicking a Hellmuth tilt because Hellmuth has a tilt-after-losing tilt history.
@rico3053057 жыл бұрын
Are you sure it is pronounced "vernerable"... it might actually be "vulnerable" lol... 6:39 6:43 LOL...
@MrKydaman7 жыл бұрын
Mike did play the hand poorly, but he knows it is very uncharacteristic of Phil to run a big bluff like that. Phil also says later in that episode that he knew Mike only had one bullet (buy in) so he knew Mike had to be cautious.
@GrandmaBetty19458 жыл бұрын
@Doug Polk 13:05 Sometimes a high stakes player can say one line which makes me lose all respect for him. In this case Mike proves he is an idiot by saying "He hit a fucking 2 outer on me" when a 2nd 6 hit the river. The entire hand Mike had been cautious with KK facing Helmuths reraise. It already started pre flop with Mike saying something like ''you always have it when you look at me''. The only hand Mike was worried about was AA at that point, and maybe QQ which is really the bottom end of Hellmuths value reraise range. Hellmuth has stated many times that he never plays big pots with JJ and everyone knows he flats that pre. So on the flop Mike really only worries about AA and QQQ. The turn bricks and so does the river 6 which pairs the board. Should be a blank for anyone who understands poker. I try to follow Mikes process and when he tanks the river I think ''Mike is putting Helmuth on AA''. But then when he mentions a 2 outer I realize that Mike is a fish and has no idea about hand reading. The range he worried about pre flop and on the flop is 100% inconsistent with his river read. Hellmuth never has a 6 with this line, which is a read that even a micro stakes player can make. Agreed?
@barygol8 жыл бұрын
He could be referring to the whole hand. A 2 outer of jacks or queens to break his kings.
@GrandmaBetty19458 жыл бұрын
barygol It would have to be QQQ. Hellmuth has never reraised JJ in his entire career and there are many videos of him saying that not 3betting JJ is what makes him such a "great player" that separates him from the rest. I don't recall Mikes words exactly but I believe he specifically said "2 outer on the river" which means he was really reading Hellmuth for a 6. If that is true, Mike should not be playing anything higher than microstakes
@barygol8 жыл бұрын
Although he weren't referring to the 6 he shouldn't be allowed to play here. He goes broke time and time again and the only reason he still plays is because he's banked and as it was a famous face he used to be invited to theses TV games. Even Phil is a much better player than he is. Edit : just re-watched the video. He doesn't say anything about the river. I'm convinced he's thinking of QQ, JJ. If you rule out JJ then he's putting Phil on precisely QQ. All in all, bad fold by a donkey.
@bennyjg44497 жыл бұрын
getoffmypage No. He meant 2 outer by Queens or Jacks hitting 2 outs on him. Not the 6 river.
@colinglen45057 жыл бұрын
+ getoffmypage ..i'm a micro stakes player and I couldn't make that read! ...that's why i'm a micro stakes player.
@thexamlop7 жыл бұрын
One thing tho is that Hellmuth is definitly never 3-betting AQ PF in BBvsEP so Mattusow has a pure bluffcatcher on the river (he should probably still call, yes...).
@bronch37334 жыл бұрын
"Show the deuce-seven and collect five hundred!"
@jareddion97598 жыл бұрын
we did this online on pokerstars it was fun we actually played for 6 hrs straight it was fun
@thomasminter4 жыл бұрын
Over-analysis. It's quite simple: Mike's playing on scared money and thinks that Phil has QQ or (less likely) JJ. This was 2006 (maybe even 2005) so there's almost no chance Phil is re-raising Mike's UTG raise with anything less than JJ, and - in fact - probably only QQ+ (or, in this game, 72); in fact, in 2006 even re-raising an UTG raiser with QQ was not considered the standard play which is why Mike only calls with his KK, especially against a tight opponent like Phil. During this era of poker there's almost certainly no way Matusow is ever raising UTG with 86s.
@bossbozz29758 жыл бұрын
mike folded because he had 1 bullet. phill knew that , that's why he made that bet
@LM-ys8kr3 жыл бұрын
I seen a cash game where Matusow was up big & Phil lent him cash to get in, then Phil went broke & told Mike he wanted his money & that he was leaving. I kinda thought that was rude in front of everyone.
@mattjwatson50894 жыл бұрын
Should be more like $5000 per player at these stakes. $500 a person isn't even 1 5k chip.
@fabian13333 Жыл бұрын
mike is tight passive
@psadoug8 жыл бұрын
ph never is this ballsy but he does it cuz its matusow.
@cbosmooth7 жыл бұрын
great info but this really only came down to hellmuths image,. he's such a nit that when he bluffs it works most of the time and coupled with Phil's preflop action Mike was sure he had it,. easy for me to say but Phil looked super uncomfortable betting on the river. Mike should have seen that,,. he was squirming trying to talk himself into betting,,. unless Mike thought that was a reverse tell
@mathewi27618 жыл бұрын
this line of checking flop and potting turn doesn't look to me as a set
@fufuhu1488 жыл бұрын
Mike's thinking process should be something like when he 3bet and check the flop, Phil have a pair JJ+, so he can't beat any of those. And also, he only has one bullet, that's why he folded.
@tjebbedonckers8 жыл бұрын
Phil almost never 3bets hands like AQ and/or KQ, especially against a tightass like Mike, who he knows so well. Basically: Phil isnt the 3bet kinda guy. So he really is only repping AA, QQ and maybe JJ here. So when he makes the bet on the river, it really is either a monster or 27. So I dont really blame the fold. It's a good bluff by Phil, though.
@BrendanBeckett7 жыл бұрын
Every time you call a deuce a "two" I get a little triggered
@OsefKincaid8 жыл бұрын
I don't think Matusow beats a lot of Hellmuth's value bets when he chooses this sizing.
@lessmore82588 жыл бұрын
Think about this, if hellmuth doesn't get here with aces, only showing up with all his combos of qq, jj, aqs and NEVER bluffs he can still profitably call this bet. If hellmuth also got here will all of this aces, which seems ludicrous but whatevs, he'd need like 6.74 combos of bluffs to bluff 31% of the time. If he only had 2.5 combos of bluffs, where he's bluffing 14.28% of the time, which would less than 50% of the frequency which he should be bluffing with, he can still call.
@OsefKincaid8 жыл бұрын
Less More I'm not saying it's a fold, I just don't think Hellmuth uses this sizing to value bet a hand worse than kings, that's all
@lessmore82588 жыл бұрын
He should.
@robg9157 жыл бұрын
Nice chalkboard
@spectreQ8 жыл бұрын
why are your eye circles so dark?
@irosencrantz49317 жыл бұрын
Spectre my "eye circles" are pinkish. I always look stoned. Great for job interviews.
@theartofcompetition59657 жыл бұрын
i think mike was very scared of his value hands being aa qq jj and didnt think hellmuth had almost any bluffs. i dont think he puts aq and ak so much in his 3 betting range. most likely that was his train of thought imo. if thats his thinking then mike really beats nothing.
@paulmoore79647 жыл бұрын
write a book
@BaliBaggins8 жыл бұрын
seven-deuce not seven-two... common doug what would doyle brunson think of you :P
@rolandkennedy803 жыл бұрын
This is when Vanessa was real af
@SoulLoveBase7 жыл бұрын
couldn't hemulth be repping pocket sixes?
@TJPatriot748 жыл бұрын
Verna able?
@yeolderuckas85688 жыл бұрын
Matusow only brought one bullet for the game. He had just sat down and didn't want to bust the game right away. Hellmuth knew that Matusow did not have enough cash to rebuy.
@BrightBoreen Жыл бұрын
Why can’t Doug say vulnerable
@smaze17827 жыл бұрын
Doug, is Hellmuth value betting QJ not reasonable here?
@ishnakagawa47547 жыл бұрын
Spencer Maze hell much wouldn't 3 bet with QJ
@Roman-uc3bs7 жыл бұрын
I disagree that a river call is as clear cut as the video and comments make it out to be. Matusow raised under the gun, so Hellmuth's 3-bet looks stronger than it would if Matusow was, say, in the cutoff. Would 7-2 be a profitable 3-bet if he's risking being 4bet by Matusow? It's not so clear, as Polk points out himself in the video. This makes 7-2 less likely as many would choose to smooth call with 7-2. There are 16 combinations of 7-2, and 24 combinations of AA, KK, QQ and JJ combined (I have done out the combinations of one such pair at the end of this comment). So the nominal probability of 7-2 is actually much smaller than that of a top 2% hand range. The BIGGEST consideration I feel the video did not properly weigh in on was the fact that Hellmuth checked the flop, followed by a turn overbet. YES, in a vacuum, AQ and KQ could still value bet river given how weak Matusow's line was, but this rationale largely ignores how unlikely it would be for Hellmuth to check the flop with AQ or KQ. His range is polarized to AA, a set, or 7-2, because ONLY THESE HANDS WOULD BE COMFORTABLE GIVING A FREE CARD. So, Matusow's decision basically came down to how likely Helmuth is to 3bet his UTG raise and then pull a two street bluff with exactly 72. Combinations of AA: Ac Ah / Ac Ad / Ac As / Ah Ad / Ah As / Ad As (six in total for each pair)
@VengerSatanis3 жыл бұрын
Cha'alt!
@simonjaeger32018 жыл бұрын
vernable lol
@igorbelyakov85078 жыл бұрын
Doug Polk - would you call if you in Matusow's position. I am not sure if you would call with one pair! Personally I am not sure what we can learn from this video - we already know that Phil can bluff!
@jakewilliam158 жыл бұрын
Vernerable?
@aquacube7 жыл бұрын
If they weren't playing the 72 game Mike may have never been winning against Hellmuth in that situation. Perhaps a great exploitative fold except for Mike forgot to factor in the 72.
@jtg25253 жыл бұрын
One of the worst folds in poker history
@JulianHaardt8 жыл бұрын
why is he not trying to sell 9,10?
@scrowtymcbuggerballs55398 жыл бұрын
Because 9Ts bets the flop to utilize FE plus there not that deep so hes less likely to 3b i pre
@yugiohamersfoort60513 жыл бұрын
Skip the talk and just show us the whole clip
@amblerstephenson45598 жыл бұрын
Hey Doug, great stuff. I'd like to see your thoughts on the hand Ivey vs Esfandiari at Aria recently where Ivey flopped set of 2s vs Esfandiari's flopped straight. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Y8B6a7l0vtWVd2g.html I think its a very rangey situation (as opposed to physical reads) for both players, and given how aware Ivey is of his situations, I found it a very interesting call down. Thx