Dr. Darren Staloff, Spinoza's Ethics

Рет қаралды 48,746

2 жыл бұрын

You can find more of Spinoza's work here amzn.to/3bQQ22W
This is the official KZfaq channel of Dr. Michael Sugrue.
Please consider subscribing to be notified of future videos, as we upload Dr. Sugrue's vast archive of lectures.
Dr. Michael Sugrue earned his BA at the University of Chicago and PhD at Columbia University.

Пікірлер: 156

@TheMrdangles16 2 жыл бұрын

The only person I’ve ever been able to have a conversation about Spinoza, was only one philosophy professor in our whole department. Absolutely remarkable that this is free...thank you so much

@thesnowybanana2971 Жыл бұрын

and i'm sure you're the only urinating giraffe he was ever able to have a conversation about Spinoza with

@moose7012 10 ай бұрын

Never thought id see Furio giving a lecture on Spinoza

@mingus445_gaming 3 күн бұрын

this is furio's secret life. he only moonlights as a fighting man when he has to

@sorenaleksander2670 2 жыл бұрын

I studied under Harold Bloom at NYU in the late 90s, when he was in a distinctly Spinozaen phase...the office hours were AMAZING!!!

@tdesq.2463 2 жыл бұрын

You had it pretty good there! Definitely!

@aano1370 2 жыл бұрын

So lucky, found almost no support for my Spinozan enthusiasm.

@maxnul 2 жыл бұрын

Simply amazing, the modern world is just insane; I feel better after listening to this

@tdesq.2463 2 жыл бұрын

Spinoza's ETHICS was one of the most profoundly effective game changers in this Old Boy's life & worldview. Great Post! ~TD, Boston

@DevelopmentofAvoid 2 жыл бұрын

0:00 Introduction 3:16 Criticism of the Judeo-Christian tradition 9:11 Criticism of Descartes 11:46 Rational Spirituality 13:00 Attributes (singularity) 17:16 God's Mind 17:56 Logical necessity (monistic determinism) 19:36 The "nature" of man 23:41 Posit 1, Conatus (survival) 24:16 Posit 2, Association (stimulus and response) 26:37 Way of salvation 29:49 Understanding the cause of emotions 31:29 Understanding the necessity of events 34:04 Understanding = peace 36:49 Conclusion (find what keeps your happiness in tact)

@thattimestampguy 2 жыл бұрын

Nice

@cheri238 Жыл бұрын

Excellent ❤️

@CharlesDarwinHimself 2 жыл бұрын

Also worth mentioning that Spinoza employed his method in the Ethics to avoid the eloquence of rhetoric; he sought the Euclidan method in his Ethics because he was a man of reason, and for him, to speak of anger, sadness, jealousy, and so forth, was the same as speaking of the properties of matter.

@lostintime8114 2 жыл бұрын

I love Dr staloffs lectures, very articulated and easy to understand fundamentally. Good stuff

@hunterroark8240 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for uploading these for free 100 times better than the lectures at my college

@MB-ue2rf Жыл бұрын

Your lecture's terribly moving finale did sell me on Spinoza's attempt in his determined times to be honest, if only in a way he was able to live with. Thank you Dr. Staloff.

@bertjunrieQ 2 жыл бұрын

I love this lecture. You are making his Ethics comprehensible that I can get some overview to the main points of his philosophy. Now I can reread Ethics, which I hope it would be more fruitful reading. Thank you!

@ramiroortega3723 7 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for taking the time to put this jewel at the reach of those of us who are interested in Western history. Eugen Weber is a great communicator: informative, rigorous and humorous. I’ve enjoyed watching this program. Very much appreciated.

@reachadi1029 2 жыл бұрын

This man is smooth!

@aadarshtripathi6952 8 ай бұрын

damnnn man these are the things i should not listened in my early 20s, once is started watching this channel i felt there is no going back

@highintrial 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you again for putting all these lectures on KZfaq.

@enlightenedanalysis Жыл бұрын

Brilliant lecture.

@cheri238 7 ай бұрын

Happy New Year 2024!!❤ Spinoza was the first philosopher I learned about at the age of five years old. (Religions) I did not like to read "Heidi." My papa gave me an opportunity to experience books on various subjects at a very young age. Enternally grateful.

@enlightenedanalysis 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you Darren. This was a really interesting lecture. I also like your style of delivery and the way you make it easier to understand. Really appreciate this video. Thanks.

@cheri238 Жыл бұрын

I have seen this lecture many times and I have thoroughly enjoyed this one on Spinoza's ethics. Thank you, Professor, Staloff. ❤️

@inanedreamz673 Жыл бұрын

Very good lecture, Spinoza is someone you reach for in a difficult time

@mamam.d.8898 2 жыл бұрын

God !, I love these lectures ♥️☀️

@christinemartin63 10 ай бұрын

On the road to truth and wisdom, it seems to me that Spinoza is a key waystation. These theories make so much sense.

@brucecollis8609 Жыл бұрын

My whole life and just came across this. So good

@ruvstof Жыл бұрын

The best introductory lecture on Spinoza I've ever watched.

@Forrestpeace 2 жыл бұрын

even if you cannot maintain equanamity or inner peace, you still are trying your best. Even if you fail to achieve any goals you have you still are trying your best. There is nothing more to be done.

@pearz420 Жыл бұрын

This is something people should say to one another, but not themselves.

@marcek9910 Жыл бұрын

Thank you professor Staloff, & thanks for posting this.

@jadelegold 19 күн бұрын

First, terrific. Second, a question (into the void, I know, but): At minute 16 or so Dr. Staloff says it's "bizarre" that Spinoza would say that there are an infinite number of attributes. Isn't that consistent with aspect of physics? Third, again: Terrific lecture. I've been trying to read Spinoza and this review is brilliant--fascinating and inspiring.

@jackatherton0111 Жыл бұрын

One of the most engaging lectures I’ve ever heard on Spinoza. But does it (perhaps necessarily) beg the question: in a determinist universe where we lack free will, do we only pretend to “choose” spirituality. Might we as easily choose to be evil? I’m not a Calvinist but they may be closer to the mark in suggesting that each of us is predetermined to be righteous or unrighteous and we can only give thanks if all the factors in the universe lead us, determine us, to “choose” well, however that might be defined.

@jxykeem336 2 жыл бұрын

It's always the old ones 🔥🔥

@andyayala9119 Жыл бұрын

Beautiful lecture

@Phille0tardo 2 ай бұрын

This is definitely Dr. Staloff’s best hair era. His fits are impeccable too.

@DoubleRaven00 Жыл бұрын

Another great video! I winder if Spinoza ever considered that prayer need not be a superstitious request to change reality, but an expression of gratitude and meditation on precisely the truths he expounds. Couldn’t this be called “prayer” too?

@jackspicerisland 2 жыл бұрын

Staloff on Spinoza?! Canceling all tomorrow’s appointments right now 🙏🙏🙏 This channel is a (secular) miracle 🤍

@tdesq.2463 2 жыл бұрын

Love the qualifier: "Secular" Perfectly appropriate for a presentation on a Man who espoused the still unorthodox notion that the existence of (or at least the belief in) some supernatural Being is NOT Necessary to Human Spirituality. Great Comment! ~TD, Boston

@xalian17 2 жыл бұрын

Though they would revile the opinion, one can see the ground reaped by Nietzsche, Freud,, Skinner, and maybe even Wittgenstein

@adventurealchemy805 Күн бұрын

Ego has free will,but it's subordinate to Self(not self as ego self),but higher Self

@bosman1988 2 жыл бұрын

Enthusiastic lecturer!

@retardedphilosopher6097 2 жыл бұрын

Love it!

@tsul....96 Ай бұрын

These teachers truly replaced the bygone philosophers ❤❤❤

@MNMLSTN 2 жыл бұрын

the legend is back👌

@jethroegatbunton2983 2 жыл бұрын

Wonderful ideas

@steveclark4018 2 жыл бұрын

smooth operator...great lecture.

@ryanoloan4417 2 жыл бұрын

Wonderful. I was hoping this would be uploaded. Thanks so much 👍

@adventurealchemy805 Күн бұрын

We are self conscious,animals are not,we are aware of meta cognition which is higher level than only cognition ...

@adventurealchemy805 Күн бұрын

That's why Jung is the Best philosopher and gnostic of whole time ...he KNEW,he didn't need to believe

@johncracker5217 11 күн бұрын

Somebody once said Nietzsche popularized nihilism. I corrected him and said it was Spinoza. Nietzsche is the solution to Spinoza.

@alohaoliwa Жыл бұрын

Made me cry thank you

@tzakman8697 2 ай бұрын

can't believe this is free on youutube.

@Zandonus Ай бұрын

It's great that prof shows the difference between Aurelius and Spinoza. Aurelius kind of accepted that people can and will be dicks to you, but Spinoza adds that they have their own reasons for doing what they do, and making everyone understand their emotional decisions is.. a colossal task, and not really yours to partake.

@zumzoz7245 2 жыл бұрын

Great lecture

@slimmamba7208 Жыл бұрын

This guy is a total bro

@Diplomastronaut 2 жыл бұрын

Spinoza will have his day in the sun sometime soon

@mouseandryforever6848 Ай бұрын

I'm in love.

@philipestrin4381 2 жыл бұрын

Spinoza didn't arrive where he did capriciously. He was extremely well versed in Talmud and Torah. Moreover, many of his precepts (but not all of them, by ant means) are consistent with Kabbalistic doctrine, especially that of the ayin sof.

@thattimestampguy 2 жыл бұрын

4:56 “Given our modern scientific knowledge of the world, how can we believe…we find ourselves in Heaven?” 6:34 Tools are made with purpose But man puts intent into the world, the world doesn’t deal in purpose 11:42 Rational Spirituality, Pantheism 12:34 Mind and Body 13:16 Multiple descriptions of events are possible; different aspects, different attributes “In Terms Of.” 16:56 Nature and Mind, God’s Mind 17:56

@JoaoSilva-zt2lg 2 жыл бұрын

this dr is still alive? thanks for sharing this

@marcobrambilla2439 2 жыл бұрын

Yes, he's still active

@jobebrian 2 жыл бұрын

04:23 “Now that we are at the very cusp of the Newtonian revolution!” 05:50 “a spirituality, as it were, for a rational person of the 20th century” 06:56 “Therefore there must be some sort of toolmaker who created them, right? Food just happened to serve our purposes!” 08:09 “working itself out through the causal nexus.” 12:21 “one can reverence life”

@zazzles123 Жыл бұрын

I wonder what Spinoza would think about predictability of people's behavior if he ever drove a car

@Ayelord_khory 17 күн бұрын

16:25 We Out Here

@xenoblad 2 жыл бұрын

Eh… Making peace with world seems easy on an individualist level. It becomes a lot harder to “turn the other cheek” when that cheek is your mother’s, or your wife’s, or your best friend’s, or your child’s. You transition from stoicism to indolence when you accept cruelty to others.

@itshorriful Жыл бұрын

Turning the other cheek ends drama for you at that moment. You don't need to retaliate every time. Avoiding sometimes is the best way. It could get much worse.

@judithbreastsler 2 жыл бұрын

oh wait duuude, is this guy Spinoza?

@piezoification Жыл бұрын

Elan Vitale confounded with the nihilism of The Will to Power and Aristotles description of the physical Word is " ridiculous" speak what you truly know or not at all. Overall good lecture on Spinoza - he's actually more interesting, I hope students read him seriously and discuss independently.

@ArthurYannLB 5 ай бұрын

From some angles, I feel as though I am watching a philosophy lecture given by Steven Segal.

@clockywork 2 жыл бұрын

Superb

@michaeldao1 2 жыл бұрын

@13:24 So cool to see the old eng notations, this must've been filmed in the mid 70s?

@michaeldao1 2 жыл бұрын

*wonderful talk as usual, thanks so much for the upload

@ChromeMagnum 2 жыл бұрын

hell yea

@grapeshott Жыл бұрын

Nice

@adventurealchemy805 Күн бұрын

99,6 of our daily activity and reactivity are unconscious or subconscious

@cop-killer- 2 жыл бұрын

this dude still talks the same if you listen to his newer videos its hilarious

@darudesandstorm7002 2 жыл бұрын

got a link to his channel?

@juliozambrano4967 2 жыл бұрын

@@darudesandstorm7002 he's done a Ted talk in regards to American club culture and has done some talks for public institutions. His voice is deeper and he dropped the ponytail 😔

@Iksvomid 2 жыл бұрын

He is still The Dude though.

@ruvstof Жыл бұрын

@@Iksvomid Why dude? This makes no sense!

@Rico-Suave_ 10 ай бұрын

Watched all of it 38:32

@halahala6425 Жыл бұрын

Yeah, you realllly must be doing something right if everyone hates you. Well put, doc.

@bohnulus Жыл бұрын

love it

@tm2jetfire Жыл бұрын

Sounds kind of like Spinoza discovered existentialism, Freudian psychology, and new age religion. Ahead of his time to say the least!

@Be_tyagi Жыл бұрын

Interesting 👍🏻

@TheIntrepid7 Жыл бұрын

Great!!!

@cadenmoran775 2 жыл бұрын

that ponytail is so hot

@parkinglotsofhell 4 ай бұрын

Didn’t Descartes like never leave his hometown? Which was in France?

@parkinglotsofhell 4 ай бұрын

Nevermind I am thinking of Kant, who never left his hometown

@JB-ru4fr 2 жыл бұрын

I still don’t see how the life of resignation to one’s circumstances albeit with love and understanding can be an ethical state of mind. Plus, if it is good for one, is it necessarily good for all? Necessity may exist but who is the authority on what is necessary? Spinoza’s ethics seems to permit all actions if all is necessary and really contributes little to morality other than saying “do as you will”.

@tdesq.2463 2 жыл бұрын

Interesting points. Very interesting. Please stay tuned. If okay with You, I hope to address the issues that You've raised here. They definitely merit careful and serious consideration. There is a major paradox at the Heart of this Philosophy. Please allow me some time to organize my thoughts on it. EXCELLENT COMMENT!!! ~TD, Boston

@elanfatal7174 2 жыл бұрын

Since everything is necessary, that is, determined, then there really isn't a "will" to "do as one will". In Spinoza's system, all actions are validated as ethical insofar as they are all determined by the laws of nature (God, natura naturans, etc.). If there is any truly ethical act in the way that you are thinking of, its the act of understanding the very fact that we are determined. The real question, however, is how could thinking escape its own determined nature?

@tdesq.2463 2 жыл бұрын

@@elanfatal7174 BANG!!!!!!!!!! That's the Paradox!!!! You Nailed It!!! Now, how might we be able to reconcile this glaring incongruity? I have an idea. But You're well on point with this issue, so I'll yield the Floor. But Yes ... You're definitely on this. Very Cool!!! 👍👍👍 ~TD PS: I'll give You a hint as to my resolution. You Yourself uttered the key term/concept: "Escape" However, I would object to Your question as worded. Grounds: Assumes a critical fact not in evidence. Think about it. You've got this. I know You do.

@dialaskisel5929 2 жыл бұрын

Resigning yourself to (or just accepting) things that cannot be changed prevents unnecessary mental stress. Pointless and excessive anxiety and distress can be harmful to your well-being, and, moreover, can put you in a mental state where you are less compassionate or sensitive towards others (via frustration, impatience, apathy, hatred, etc) This form of ethical system isn't proscriptive and law-oriented, it's more prescriptive and advice oriented. The point isn't to demand you and the world follow a certain system "or else!" it's to offer an easy and widely applicable mindset that can serve to help you live a happier life. As a banal example: if you get a large scratch on your leg and ask what you should do, a piece of advice would be to put some antibiotic and a bandage on it. The response of "why should I?!" and then beginning to rub salt into the scratch is not morally abhorrent or illegal. But it is a bit silly and will probably cause some completely unnecessary pain and suffering.

@tdesq.2463 2 жыл бұрын

@@dialaskisel5929 Very Good!

@sullivanfraser9823 3 ай бұрын

This guys mannerisms are insane

@Annie-xo1iq 2 жыл бұрын

god im obsessed with him

@trouaconti7812 10 ай бұрын

Spinoza or Stalloff?

@bluelantern144 Жыл бұрын

Hey is this guy Spinoza? He looks like Spinoza

@Dino_Medici Жыл бұрын

How much would you kill to see this guy on a second date lmfaooooo the realist

@frankbongio 2 жыл бұрын

Darren Staloff!!!!

@adventurealchemy805 Күн бұрын

Gnostics have reached way higher than stoics,they have reached higher level of consciousness or gnosis

@MichaelRNYC 9 ай бұрын

You had me all the way till you referenced “the hideous repression of Communist China”. I would argue that a civilization that has existed for over 5000 years is doing “what it’s supposed to “ for the well being of 1.4 billion people. Since tens of millions leave every year as tourists and students, and return, it’s reasonable to believe they like their home and their culture. As far back as I can recall, I have believed that matter, time, space, processes, and all other attributes were how I defined god. Thank you

@OldMovieRob Жыл бұрын

Dave Gahan?

@elel2608 6 ай бұрын

15:00

@hsaqer007 2 жыл бұрын

💕

@dreyri2736 Ай бұрын

For a rationalist, Spinoza sure likes to limit reason to some very highly specific thing. Shaming your dog simply does not count as "reason", for some reason. Reason has to either be only in the mind or given in the form of hot air coming from the mouth. Who am I kidding. All rationalists ever do is make large claims and accuse everyone else of dogmatism. Thank god Kant managed to see through this

@JohnDoe-qm8ns 11 ай бұрын

28:30

@poo79884 10 ай бұрын

Lecturer is hot

@georgegrubbs2966 7 ай бұрын

Many factual errors in this presentation. For example, Spinoza was independently wealthy. True for a few years in his younger years. A few years later, the money was gone. He was not independently wealthy. He did lens grinding to make money to pay bills. In fact, the dust from lens grinding served to kill him in his 40s.

@cheri238 7 ай бұрын

He gave all his inheritance to his sister with no regrets. (With dignity!!!) Who would blame Spinoza for that? The laws of nature. What a philosopher!!! A sense of "awe" of the cosmos.

@georgegrubbs2966 7 ай бұрын

@@cheri238 I am a "Spinozan" so I fully appreciate his life and philosophy. His inheritance and what he did with it is complicated. He had the responsibility of pay his father's buinsess debts and it got legally complicated. Please see pages 220 - 228 in "Spinoza: Life and Legacy" by Jonathan I. Israel. Descartes only lived in Amsterdam for a year. Leibniz only met Spinoza for one brief time, so he didn't really know him personally, plus he criticized part of Spinoza's philosophy. Christian churches did not excommunicate Spinoza since he was not a Christian and did not belong to a Christian religion. He ground lens for microscope and telescopes.

@skhotzim_bacon 6 ай бұрын

* e4 Kc6

@j0kez708 Жыл бұрын

From the age of faith to the age of "reason". Lmao.

@PastafarianPriest 3 ай бұрын

I too was enamored of Spinoza for years until I realized that he knew nothing of real life. He died a forty-four-year-old virgin.

@runthomas 10 ай бұрын

what he is saying is that spinoza ....read up on buddhism and put it in his own words.

@kpllc4209 2 ай бұрын

His library is still in available these are just a continuation of Greek ideas.

@Eloign Жыл бұрын

Whats funny is Spinoza saying we are utterly determined in thought word and deed yet saying we should understand and conquer our emotions 😂 silliness

@ruvstof Жыл бұрын

You didn't understand! We are determined to strive as if we were free.

@Eloign Жыл бұрын

@@ruvstof Determined by whom? If you invoke Physics then the claim is unfalsifiable at best. If you invoke God then it's patently false and blasphemous. Physics cant tell you if your thoughts are determined based on any experiments. The Bible says you are free to choose. Spinoza is silly I'm sorry.

@crisgon9552 Жыл бұрын

@Eloign your claim that God determines our world is even less falsifiable. The Bible can be made to say a lot of things. There are lots of Christians that believe in predestination and that God can harden our hearts

@Eloign Жыл бұрын

@@crisgon9552 Anything can be made to say anything without context. That doesn't mean it's the fault of the text it's the fault of the person twisting the words. I can misinterpret what you just said either deliberately or because I have poor reading comprehension skills. Doesn't mean you had no intention or inherent meaning in your words. The Bible is the same of course. Calvinists are ignorant to an extreme degree. They are a minority of Christians that read determinism into the text. It's not the Historical view or present view of the vast majority of Christians and it doesn't make any sense of the Bible either. I did a whole hour long video on my other channel looking at their proof-texts and why they don't make sense IN CONTEXT. Just read it yourself and look at the context. No need for it to be a mystery.

@crisgon9552 Жыл бұрын

@Eloign you are correct that Calvanism is wrong but at the end of the day God is still sovereign over everything. When Job asked why he had to suffer what was God's answer? His passive will may not be as passive as you think. The Bible isn't black and white on this. If a believer believes that the Holy Spirit has revealed something to them, how can you deny them that? Scripture alone, right? Jesus, my Bible, and I. Your initial comment was that Spinoza was silly to think we are determined and I do think you misunderstood him. The way we behave in a way is dictated by both nature and nurture. Think of a spouse or best friend, you really can predict what they will say. It's complicated and incomplete I will grant you that but his ideas are an important stepping stone into modern psychology.

@roguelove 2 жыл бұрын

@user-hu3iy9gz5j Жыл бұрын

What about it?

@ruskiny280 2 жыл бұрын

So many assumptions. "It is stranger thsn we can think." Science cannot explain why matter exists. "God alone suffices" STA.

@Reymundodonsayo 4 ай бұрын

Sorry but this guy is just too hard to watch very boring presentation and it looks like he’s emulating Michael Sugrue

@sapientum8 2 жыл бұрын

Spinoza's "human spirituality" is essentially worship of the creation instead of the Creator, which is the definition of paganism, minus all the negative connotations usually associated with that concept. This is the "natural religion" of humanity, arising spontaneously in human tribes, and is undoubtedly the first step of the ladder, as it were, where all humans start (hopefully) their spiritual ascent. However advocating to go back to that natural religion is like advising a grown up man to put on pampers and start sucking on a baby's pacifier.