The big problem with a rogue twitch employee leaking tons of evidence like logs or screenshots is that legally, there are VERY serious issues with identifying the minor/victim that compromises both their safety and court case. I absolutely wish this sort of behavior couldn't be brushed under a rug for someone down the line to find after it's too late to take action. But at the same time, leaking such sensitive info is simply not okay. Really the moral of the story here is that the authorities need to do their job when they get reports like this and actually make an arrest. Many cases like Doc's fall into a legal grey area where what they're doing isn't outright illegal, but it always leads to something worse. What we really need are new laws that protect minors better from people like him, as well as law enforcement reforms that hold police to a higher standard than "decades of backlogged SA cases just rotting in an evidence locker." Despite their actions to suppress the story, Twitch legally HAS to report the activity Doc participated in on their platform. The fact that case went no where (apparently anyway) is what gave them the green flag to cover it up to begin with.

Dr Disrespect's love life is like Blackjack - He aims for 21 but keeps hitting on 16

Is there like a rule that big youtubers must be either scammers or predators?

You stated that Doc "knew she was a minor" with surety. To me thats important to verify as it directly speaks to how bad this situation is

Driftor: From COD in depth to Doctor in depth 💀💀

That title tho 😂😂

Its the glasses. I call them Minor Visors. EDP445 also had a pair

Great video, but one small point, asking for evidence is not cognitive dissonance. It's due diligence. Everyone has the right to the presumption of innocence until evidence suggests otherwise. You're better than that mate.

You know how easy it is to not text a minor

If the report is correct, Twitch did do something in 2017. They reported him to the authorities, and he was found to have done nothing illegal. The timeline doesn't make much sense, though. If they knew he did this in 2017, why wait 3 years and an eight figure deal later to ban him? I believe they didn't find those messages until 2020, after they signed him to his deal. They investigated him because of the deal, and due to time constraints (if they didn't sign him, Mixer would have), they didn't have enough time to do a full investigation until after the ink dried. The new rumor is Twitch employees catfished him, but I find that hard to believe, although Twitch did pay him his full contract and damages, so who knows. The whole thing is weird and, in a way, seems intentional. By all involved, including Dr. Disrespect.

Title is chad

I never believed Twitch would ban such a popular streamer with zero explanation. The guy's been lying to his fans for years and some of them are still trying so hard to cope. I also agree that NDAs should not be legal when they're created to stop whistleblowers from reporting criminal or unethical behavior like this.

I have enjoyed Doc’s streams, but I’m not out here looking for some reason to defend Doc. I don’t really get why it seems like people need to put everyone into a box of left or right. I lean towards innocent until proven guilty, simply because I think it’s easy for people to become mob-like and hateful throughout history. It doesn’t mean I think someone should “get away” with committing an illegal or immoral act. I don’t think it’s equitable to what Doc is being accused of, but putting up a fake “screenshot” of a DM showing the accusation happened about a 14 year old as a the video’s main image honestly is sad. Why is it so hard for people who seemingly have no skeletons in the closet (I genuinely doubt it - I imagine the energy you portray when you’re even less careful about how you look) to NOT take it code red levels of justified hatefulness. Lastly, I don’t know why it’s so hard to see nuance in anything that we consider to be “wrong.” It’s wrong for me to drive without a seatbelt on. Does everyone on earth need to know or make it into a news headline? No. Okay, is sexting a minor wrong? Yes. Does everyone need to know about it? If it was criminal they would be marked as a predator. In addition, there is absolutely nuance (also in a court of law) to sexting someone who is prepubescent versus someone who is 17. Do I still think it’s wrong? Yes. Do I think it’s enough to cancel someone? Not really, no - if they were pre-16 then sure. There are literally states and regions where 17 is legal, even 16. Many 16 or 17 are biologically and mentally mature - are there cases where they’re not? Yeah. This is again, nuance. Laws/NDA’s don’t have much nuance other than proving intent. Humans and our understanding of the world can see nuance both in our experience and collectively. Having “nuance” doesn’t mean the conversation or criticism can’t happen, just means you will actually have a meaningful discussion other than someone just getting angry and hurting others with their anger (this is how adult relationships work, much like it “should” (other than that it’s less dramatic and therefore less entertaining) in how we present ourselves online, often anonymously, on social media, and posting videos/comments).

To be fair, if his job is working with 90% kids as the target audience, he should have had far more common sense for it. I understand the asshole side, but I don't understand the stupidity side.

Let me first say that to hear call of duty ghost came out about 10 years ago, insane! Drift I’m glad I could be a part of your community for the long-haul! I think it’s really sad though that twitches exactly like every other corporation out there. Using legal NDA’s to suppress anything that could jeopardize their money, is criminal. And maybe things will change, but apparently money talks louder.

Because i see a lot of comments from "sheep" saying "when he sees a minor" and copying/pasting/repeating the fck out of their miserable lives, all i have to say is that: - You will never know what this guy deals with so you cannot tell what the hell happened the last 3-4 years (in his deals) that make them "reveal" something from this guy's past (AND whether if it is true AND you'll never know the circumstance of that event (if indeed happened) ) - If he indeed did something bad, there is always room for forgiveness (this is what Jez Christ says too) Because, ... you know what ... YOU may be in his place in the future when the ones you make deals with may hold something "disgusting" of you to reveal to the public's rage ! So people ("sheep") BE WISE when it comes to judge ANYONE online (or offline) !

Kicked off of Twitch but then received millions because they broke the contract. This raises questions about what really went down. Just because a report is made, it doesn't mean it's true. When someone wants to destroy another person's reputation, they can simply make an accusation. The reference to "various authorities" is misleading. Companies are required to report allegations to these agencies, whether the claims are true or false, the moment any accusation is investigated to build a record for future connections for the alleged victim and subject. It's not about someone deeming it serious enough to report; it's a mandatory process. If Twitch didn't report, it would be failing its duty, according to oversight committees. Having worked in this field, I know how easily someone can be labeled without evidence. Most cases, in fact, don't have any evidence, it's just the accusation. I've witnessed both sides: the guilty facing justice and the innocent having their lives ruined. This is why I refrain from jumping to conclusions based on public opinion. I know you streamers are scared and are just going with the narrative. Just shows how little life experience some people have.

Sucks that he turned out this way, but ZERO tolerance for diaper snipers, he can join the woodchipper with the rest of them

Dude, that's one of the best titles I've ever seen. And I write lyrics. HAHAHA. Well played. Good to see you feeling better and more...upright, as of late man.

Trying to draw parallels between COD leaks and dm’ing a minor is hilariously stupid.

And you'll be bombarded with the "there's no proof/opinion proves nothing" crowd even though Doc himself admitted the deed. Love ya Drift!

Drift0r opening up many cans of worms here but i wanna dive into dr diddy leaking AW to you.... this must be common with people working within games to want to leak what their working on. Its not hackers or anything, its always insiders

Was just on a binge of a bunch of your old videos. Really cheers me up to see how far you've gotten, and that you still have the opportunity to make the same entertaining content all these years later. Title was so ballsly, but hilarious btw

My question is this. If the NDA does not cover you from criminal acts, why wasn't doc subject to the court of law had he been attempting to sexually advance on a minor? The other perspective to consider is that doc himself mentions nothing illegal occurred nor was there any wrongdoing. With that being said, could inappropriate be something along the lines of non-sexual advances, such as crude jokes and offensive language? There is a possibility that he is guilty of everything, but the problem is that in order to fully verify the details, the whispers would have to be made public in order to make some kind of established opinion. The bigger issue is that they probably won't release the whispers because of legal reasons and whatnot. I don't support inappropriately messaging minors when it comes to messages containing sexual advances. If Doc actually is guilty of this, he would have to be submitted to a court of law or registered as an offender. The reason why he hasn't is either because nothing illegal actually happened or it's being covered up based on the conspiracy. Don't label me as defending doc though. I just try to see things through full verification rather than siding with the majority

Bruu really say I’m 14 is that okay >.< 💀💀💀

Did you get the chat logs?

if what these former twitch employees are saying is true then why isnt doc in jail? why wasnt he charged? sexting is a crime, a federal crime, and age of consent doesnt matter at all. any and all sexting with anyone under 18 is a federal crime. it does matter if the minor consented or not... they dont even need the minor to make a complaint. all they need is chat/text logs. and before anyone brings up, "its hard to prosecute". wrong. its hard to prosecute set ups like dateline or these other groups where an adult is pretending to be a minor. but an adult sexting an actual minor is not complicated or difficult to charge and prosecute and gets convictions. again, why was he never even charged?

You're right Driftor, someone does need to leak all the messages to expose all the weirdos. Its sad to realize how many of these people exist, not just in the entertainment industry but also in positions of power like in the Vatican like you mentioned.

Your thumbnails are always great Drift0r

6:27 Damn, you even hit em w/ the missile that looks like that meme of the mansion w/ all the red dots in it. 😂😂

Dr.Diddlerspect is at large😭

Legit don't understand why people are defending him. He admitted to doing it. With the same energy and arrogance you'd expect from someone who would be saying the exact opposite. 😂

NDAs should never be legally enforcable.

NOW KZfaq recommends you again to me even though I've been subbed for ages. Black Ops 6 stuff maybe in future from you?

People piggy backing off this situation for their own gain just to ride information they're assuming to be correct, there is literally NO RECEIPTS in terms of twitch messages for the context of this situation, thats how you sink your own ship 😂

If the DMs to the trans person are true it would make that tweet double funny in retrospect since "leave the kids alone" was both obviously something Doc did not do, but also it was an implication that LGBT people are inherently sexualizing which would be more of an admission on his own preferences.

Ive learnt the hardway that handshake deals should be legally written down and signed bc one party can just lie and make up stories about the deal

Asking congress to out them selves was hilarious.

Nahhh that title 😂

Great video. Just one question though. Considering that there was an nda, wouldn't the employ leaking this be in lots of trouble?

Your "conspiracy hat" is like the most genuine expression of care you have about this sort of thing lol.

Lol I knew Driftor would cover this at some point.

Benefits huh? Good for you u put it out there.

You can’t blame Twitch for not disclosing Doc as a predator and also say it’s wrong for them to see private whispers. If they couldn’t see the whispers, then they would indirectly be enabling this behavior. Being able to see the whispers allows them to at least monitor it, but they can’t publicly disclose everything since the legal context is very complicated.

I’m not even a fan of his but you should be sued for defamation for that thumbnail. Unsubbed

Probably the best take on the situation and the best explanation as to why twitch kept this under wraps.

This is why I never see any streamer or youtuber as the greatest thing ever. They are all people and will eventually let you down with mistakes OR crimes. Mistakes are more forgivable but those who committed crimes or like Doc could be considered a crime with solicitation of a minor there is almost no way coming back from that unless somehow evidence in the future proves otherwise (but unlikely). This is why you'll never see me in the echo cambers as some follower of a streamer/youtuber like they can do no wrong, we've seen time and time again these people fall super hard.

Can you answer why the NCMEC didn't press the issue and why there are no criminal charges against Doc? Or will you just call me a mindless simp? I don't think it's an insignificant question.

Fake a completely script read

I thought his career would be over. But then you said he has a fanbase to defend him feels like this war has only begun

A grown 18+ twitch employee catfished him pretending to be minor.

A good discussion point would also be, should a victim be allowed to take money in exchange for the predator being able to carry on living his normal life? Surely the victim is just allowing others to be a victim to the predator which in itself is like, allowing it to happen. A confusing statement i know but its something that needs addressing.

Well said. It's strange for me because I started watching your channel when you began in depth and only found out about Dr disrespect when he was banned from Twitch in 2020. I don't think there's anything you said I don't agree with, hopefully this raises some awareness 🤷🏿

Dr disrespect was at 4.73m subs, now 4.63subs.

You said to minors, plural, is that proven? Also that thumbnail is wild

As a long time subscriber I really enjoy you taking a stand Driftor

hey man, yeah I agree with you so much, however, Twitch are obligated to protect the interest of their stakeholders. Laws need to change, rather than asking any individual company to do something they're not supposed to do, when these deals are brokered by those who know the laws the best.

Fire video. rant in the end got me ready to run through a wall

A NDA is supposed to be for protecting proprietary business secrets, especially from competitors. If such a list is part of twitch's business secrets, I have more than a few issues. It also concerns me as to who would be the competitors interested in said list? Kick?

Haha great title. Havent really watched a video of yours since the advanced warfare in depth days. Awesome to see you got much bigger and are still doing great videos !

Great vid drift... Great insight.

Damn. Even Driftor is dragging this dude now.

Driftor on his Kendrick arc with that title 😂

Love this driftor!!!! The Reddit pages are crawling with people who are just defending him to the hill. It’s mind blowing how many think it’s ok what he’s done.

But Nickmercs was saying that Drag Queens were predators.....LMAO!

The title 😂

The only thing I don't understand is the 2017/2020 part.

Damn driftor! Doc is gonna throw you 60 yards when he runs into you Twitchcon!😂

Drift0r cooked with this title!🔥🤣

If you are using ANY Websites, Apps, Software, or Emails that have a Messaging feature that YOU YOURSELF DID NOT CREATE AND/OR OWN, You should have NO expectation of Privacy! NO DM's are Private PERIOD! Phone companies can hand over your texts on your personal phone because you don't OWN the Service. You don't have privacy when using some one else's stuff.

Anyone want my signed copy of his book? I don’t even want it on my bookshelf

tryna strike a chord and its probably a minooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooor

I think it's funny that people are mad about the fact twitch was reading the "private messages" I'm sure if you were to read the fine print it says they have the right to. "Private message" just means it's going directly to that person and not posted on their public post for everyone to see not that no one can look at it besides that person. A lot of you didn't listen in school about "be careful what you put online"

Even Art the Clown. Burn but factual

so the police is not charging him ? it was 7 years ago right ?

68 kills but 1 second of hill time.. Get in the hill!!

That thumbnail is crazy 😂

I've been following this whole story since it broke and have been trying to weed through all the information coming from various locations. It's hard to know what's real and what is fabricated, what is a whole truth and what is a partial truth, and especially what is possible and not possible by using previous actions, context clues, and various other sources as a guide. It's a wild situation for sure. I genuinely hope that the real, full truth comes out at some point.

Can someone make a video with new info….

title is absolutely diabolical

Ah yes this is what the old timers call Going for a cupcake

I like how everyones attentions span is so f`d up, so that the gaming footage isnt even anymore in the background but simply playing along, with a guy talking in the upper right corner about the topic we are interested in.

Seems everyone in the comment is only interested in Doc, when the NDA sneaking is WAY bigger.

Bros spittin

Can I just say the F2000 is going hard in the background

Man just that initial AW story alone is crazy

i’ve always loved that Drift0r not only has a zero tolerance policy for predatory acts of any kind, but also never tries to take the path of least resistance and will straight up call out anyone on their scummy, disgusting behavior.

Always loved your insight keep it up

That title though

Beyond his disgusting behavior, I didn't even grasp why he became so popular, but I imagine him being a former developer carried a lot of clout with it. I'm sad this all happened, not only because a minor was targeted, but influencers were ALREADY being looked at skeptically due to a bunch of bad actors. This exasperates things a lot more, and his initial response of "I DID NOTHING WRONG, ALL PARTIES CAME TO AN AGREEMENT" statement felt sus from the getgo. As I say, Karma always catches up with us.

What i explained at the end reminded me of the hashinshin case from League of legends. The guy was chatting with minors, exchanging pictures and all. He was investigated by the fbi shpoosedly and didnt face any legal consequences. I think he is still banned on twitch but on youtube i see so many comments about the guy that say "fbi cleared him so he is innocent".

It should be illegal to use an NDA to cover up anything that has already taken place, or an activity that could be deemed illegal.

Imagine Kendrick Lamar writing a massive disstrack about Drake and it also applying to a disgusting majority of adults that inhabit social media

Very informative and backed by proof. I'm gonna subscribe to you sir.

Disrespect can always make his comeback as Drakes back up dancer

Pattern of behavior. Guy showed who he was when he embarrassed his family and wife with a random twitch girl who herself LOOKED bàrely legal, regardless of her age, with the cheating scandal. I was calling this out then. The world forgave him, advanced his career, and every time I brought up how young that girl looked as part of the conversation, I was ignored or attacked. Now, here we are. No one cared when it was his wife and children he was harming. No one even seems to care now. Very few people have mentioned how his wife must feel to have gone through another infidelity scandal, but with a miñor this time. His "apology" doesn't even mention his family directly in the apology portion. He showed us who he was, and we ignored it because he was tall, handsome, and funny. Why wouldn't he think he could get away with messaging a minor ōn the communication service of his employer? The largest segment of this video, which focuses on twiīch being the "bad guy,"takes way too much blame off of the perpetrators. As Guy himself mentions, he went through arbitration and reached a settlement with twītch. That means his lawyers and twītch's lawyers agreed to the settlement. It's Guy most of all that doesn't want this to get out, more so than even twītch, and we have no idea if it was him that argued for the NDA around this in settlement. He is the bad guy. He is the one messaging minors and harming his family. We shouldn't take away from that.

Thank you to whoever gifted me with a channel membership

That title lmao

No one knows the full story. So many leeches hopping on this story acting like they know. twitch paid him out to not talk. even in his tweet he was vague AF cause he had to be.

I hope he gets divorced. He doesn’t deserve anything he has anymore. What’s he think about his daughter? Better sell that Lamborghini he supposedly has because he’ll never get a job ever again.