Please. This was great!

You can't go wrong with Dracula, my boy. Notice I say vampire! There is a difference.

And Carmilla 🧛‍♀️ 🩸

Because his queens are all over any piece of flesh he brings home and he can't trust them? 😉

undead babies... women crawling up castle walls in the dark... the stories hero dashed against a rocky cliff after leaping to what he was sure was his death... his captor secretly draining the life from him as he slept. truly the utterings of a mad genius.

He was THE original fuckmothering vampire.

Dracula is by far, my most favourite "villain". Because he effectively denounced God, for love. Or more, the love he lost. The only thing that stops him from completely losing his humanity, after all the slaughtering he did. Now that's love!!! 👏👏

I know. I've also read Marvel Comics' Tomb of Dracula series.

it was more entertaining than I was expecting tbh, the ending was awesome as well

I loved that Dracula was portrayed as a monster. Nothing romantic or sexy about him.

@@bulldogsbob that's like the problem tho he is a cunning and charming man, that's why he's scary. he is a deceptive gaslighter who possess supernatural abilities, i didnt like the portrayal of Dracula as a mindless monster..

@@maxnelson1660 He wasn’t mindless though. It pointed out that he was rationing the crew until he got to London. That was Dracula unmasked.

Dracula BBC was great too in my opinion the netflix one

I'm thankful I downloaded that video from Tale Foundry before they deleted it that went into depth on that subject I had no idea there was even a book sequel to Dracula until I saw that.

Probably AI generated😂

@@spartanghost_17 the artist is credited in the video info.

AI pics generated by narration

I DON’T SAY “BLAH BLAH BLAH”!!!!! 🧛‍♂️

@@lukespillman1313Yes you did, "Blah Blah Blah"

Not fair you knew I would say that in my head, thanks now I'm talking to myself 😒😂

@@lukespillman1313what movie is this quote from? I’ve seen a lot of Dracula shows and such and haven’t heard this one.

Hotel Transylvania

Mina looked good in "Dracula Dead and Loving It"

So stacked chix r ur bag

@@mc.girlsthatlgirls 😆

That's how you get people to click on your thumbnail these days, unfortunately. At least the characters didn't have the "jaw unhinged with fake shock" look that some many channels adopt for their thumbnail pics. I unsubscribe from any channel when they feel the need to pander to the weak-minded by making stupid thumbnail faces. Not that unnecessary over sexualization is all that great, but all media does that. As far as the "mouth agape" thing, that is a particular 'internet video only' phenomenon. I don't recall ever seeing the weather report guy on TV pulling an "oh" face. Not that I've turned on a TV since 2001.

All these women are stacked, it's like a Russ Meyer flick

Me too

It’s a great movie. Another great one is Dark Prince : The True Story of Dracula with Rudolph Martin .

How stupid! Stupidities!

​@@makeupboss3568it's a book not a movie

@@SponsorShort I know that . I’ve never read the book.

Well he did play Jonathan in Dracula 1992

Yes, I was very moved by the Carmella story. Not well known, I think, more of a long, short story.

and one day make batman videos

The brand new voyage of the Demeter or the one from a few years ago on Netflix called Dracula’s but goes over the exact story of the Demeter ? It was very nice.

Easily one of the best yes one of my fav movies period 💀💀

@@alexanderimmortal4354yeah. They are wildly good. ❤

@@Makkaru112 The new one but that other you mentioned I have to check out

Book dracula, penny dreadful iteration and dracula untold. Except that movie was ruined cuz they wanted it to be part of dark universe and they set it connected to more movies. Also just a lol I'd have if amunet and dracula were in dark universe

I think this is a case of Stocker not knowing that biological detail

It does depend on how much is tranfused as well as compatibility, but generally, yeah, it is pretty dangerous. The amount transfused is fairly self-explanatory. Compatibility is along the same lines but does have a little more wiggle room. If the compatibility is more-or-less nonexistent (e.g. A+ to O-), then the danger is pretty high, and it being fatal is arguably probable. If there is some compatibility (e.g. O+ to O-), there could still be some danger, but the lethality risk is much lower, though it is still possible, particularly if the recipient has some sort of blood-borne condition. As for blood types, for most parts of the world, O+ is the most common, so there is some degree of natural safety, but it is not much because of the second most common being A+ (a few Far Eastern nations have B+ as their second). In general, the "-" subtypes are uncommon if not rare, but they are always prevalent just enough to pose a not-insignificant risk if no prior screening is done. There have been records of _some_ knowledge of blood compatibility prior to 1900, which is when the discovery of the ABO system is credited (it is not the only system, but it is the most utilized for transfusions). Testing was extremely basic - and not exactly aimed at identifying - but otherwise straightforward: take blood samples from two different people, mix them together, and if they did not turn into a solidifying mess after a certain amount of time, then it was reasonably safe to transfuse. Of course, the actual transfusion came with risks of its own, but generally, the worst possible outcomes were screened with this. Mind you, this was hardly foolproof (nothing is), but it certainly worked.

@@DavidRichardson153 Thanks..🙂 Very interesting,and informative comment 👍 appreciate ya!!

Lots of people died in the name of science.

Van Helsing probably knew it didn't matter anyway because she was turning