😂

I know,I can here them.

Only Americans clap on flights

Luke, It's been 2 mins and I'm still laughing at this :D

Most have perished from corona

Dream job.... ☺

@@pilotahmed4579 I can’t tell if that’s a joke or not

@@theghostofadeadsperm6086 I'm being for real :/

As a non-pilot, i think they worked hard to get that plane down safely.

@@pilotahmed4579 Are you training to become a pilot? You should if not. Training is expensive but it pays off, pilot is a very needed job and pays well eventually

I wonder, does it interrupt itself? wi wi wiwiwiwiwiwiwi

@@rollingtroll It does not.

Windshear windshear windshear Windshear windshear windshear Windshear windshear windshear Windshear windshear windshear Windshear windshear windshear Windshear windshear windshear Windshear windshear windshear Windshear windshear windshear Windshear windshear windshear Windshear windshear windshear Windshear windshear windshear Windshear windshear windshear

Lol I hope not, if they hear windshear they are trained to go around immideately.

@@olivieroudsen8775 They really should have done a go around. Unnecessary risk to the passengers. Unless they were critically low on fuel.

this wasn't even a hard landing tbh

Ok I thought I was the only one lol

Imagine a Ryanair landing on a day like this :O

Jajajajajajaja.

Only suicidal people fly with Ryan Air, bottom of the barrel

korpakukac good one😂

korpakukac lol nice

Lol, no kidding! I had a good laugh at your reply!

@@harorider96 Anonymous trolling is for 5 year olds.

🤣

don’t backseat pilot y’all don’t know what you’re talking abut

@@huhner_suppe liked your comment, but watching the slow motion, i find it very scary. I live in the Netherlands and remembered that storm, it's very unpredictible wind.

you can applaud to ryan air smoothing landing

In Germany you always give the pilot applause after the landing.Since there can go so much wrong.

B O B Spelled backwards called auto pilot

i did just before landing

I agree

was it? I would like to hear from a pilot. I'd like to know if this was the safest decision to make, or if he should've done a go around.

@@felipe.raposo I don’t imagine much would have changed weatherwise in the time it would take to do a go around. Likely the safest option at the time was to stick it on the deck and be done with it.

@@mandyellis876 are you a pilot, or trained to be a pilot, or you just "think" it was the safest option? I would like to hear that from a real pilot. Maybe he didn't take the safest option and deserve a penalty for that. Maybe not.

Samuel Overs he was doing a crazy left and right maneuver just before the touchdown, does that mean that there was a cross wind or somehow a strong turbulence? And piloting expert here?

a lot of people and different trades dont get enough credit.

@@mamindhive Normally the aircraft can fix itself during turbulence (the reason why you should not be afraid of it). There were crazy winds. This is not unheard of.. Sometimes we like to kick the plans rudder on landing to give it a small correction.. Not sure if that is what happened here though.

Yeah, there are some people that are really disrespecting and say like: WhY dO PeOpLe ClAp ThEiR HaNDs WheN The PiLoT oNlY lAnDs ThE pLAnE. That’s so disrespecting. People who say that have no idea about how it is being a pilot and what an amazing job pilots do.

👍🏻

Only doing his job.....if it was too bad he would have diverted

yeah well I am impressed by his job.

That KLM pilot went to the Jacob Veldhuyzen Van Zanten school of aeronautics, very brave bunch

Jonathan Chalmers smoother than Ryanair on a clear day

Bang ding ow

SOMEWHAT

It was just messed up from side to side but it wasn’t hard at all.

Mmm butter.

Butter landing **Proceeds to stab butter with knife**

But with 0kts wind?

😂😂 me too

Cruz_Angel_ 1125 you must be a good pilot to land like that in those winds

PTG Editor zero knot winds tho😂

i swear i always strike the wing

BLA!

Down? Boeing is not down, it screwed up, it screwed up bad, but it was only one of their airplanes.

@@aerofiles5044 I think he meant the stock.

@@NewTrip_NewAdventure It's good but I'd say the 737 or A320 are both the best aircraft designs in the world. No matter if you like boeing or airbus you have to admit that they are the 2 most successful in the world, and for good reason.

Boeing use to make incredible aircraft.

True

That’s questionable. No hate, but “any rookie” would probably execute a go-around, excluding the risk at all. Chances to get the same gust in the same critical portion of flight during the next approach would be around zero.

Dymitro, they did varios go rounds...

@@ethelcross3599 got you. Not a situation to wish for, of course.

There's a whole team not just oone man...go out sometime

@@FantasticGamingHighlights yes but only one person in charge of controls. Especially on a landing like this.

"So...it...would...seem."

Pirate?

AYE MATEE! HAND 9VER THE BOOTY BARNACLE BRAIN, OR ILL RUN YE THRU WITH MY SABER!!!!!

That pirate must have been smiling. Funny I thought pirates were Somalian

God bless u!

wait ... you will STILL fly?😵😵

@@malcumx5933 Sure. It's the safest way from B to A. Pilots are highly motivated in several ways to get it down in one big piece, instead of a million little ones.

I said the exact same thing to my son, but he said the pilot should have never taken that chance. Lol!

Plot twist... The Pilot Was A Woman👩🏾‍✈️✨

@@RavishingRay101 I'd be okay with that. Why not?

HAHA "for a fact" dude you crack me up

*herself

I'm a feminnininininininininist

Kriss 22 Right... I'm wrong even if I said nothing. lol

"I know for a fact someone shit themselves" hmmm... I wonder where am I missing OP's reference to the male gender in that sentence? *scratches head*

Amen. And let's not forget everyone who made that brilliant piece of engineering.

No god blessing required. Just your regular highly skilled airline pilots and their superbly man made engineered machines and computer software. All the results of countless manhours of research and development the last 100 years. And this includes learning from previous incidents and accidents.

Paul Furey Sadly that's very true

Emi Kimura Amen man

Myken A?

Free retakes!!

Flight attendant was found in the overhead luggage compartment

@@eun5oo280 lol hahaha

Happy to hear this !!!!!

Gara Von Hoiwkenzoiber A pilot doesn't save everyone's life on a plane by landing in terrible conditions. If they crash and die, it's because he a made a stupid decision. If it's that dangerous, the only way the pilot can save everyone's life is by making a wise decision and landing at some other airport where the conditions aren't so dangerous. Presumably, this pilot knew the conditions were within the capabilities of the plane and his piloting skills. That's all.

+Aviation Fanatic You're absolutely correct. I wasn't in a jet, but I was once flying a P-Navajo and sandwiched in between a DC-9 and a B-707 on approach into Kansas City Int'l. The wake turbulence from that DC-9 threw me around like a cork in the ocean. I saved my own ass because I was skilled enough to get it on the ground. Nothing more.

***** I'm glad you made it. Wake turbulence is serious business.

+Patrick Woodlock Very true, the exact thing I wanted to say except for the "normal landing" and "no sweat" part of if... It was normal only upto 23 seconds into the video when the gust hit him hard, then his use of his skills saved everyone... Landing in windy conditions is normal but not this last second situation... but that's what you prepare for as a pilot... the unexpected... I would still give him the medal for handling it well.

Aviation Fanatic but what if the airport that is safe for landing is too far

@@QueueMaster69 agreed

2 m

Natural Nate he Already did go around the winds wearing leaving man I think the pilots knows what’s he doing

Probably was smart enough to know it is what it is, storm not gonna die down while he loops back around for attempt #2.

hahahahah true!

Maybe he did, how many times a pilot can go around with the remaining fuel on board is the question, awesome job

Well it wasn’t that bad turbulence, but the last drop would definitely be a go around normally, however it dropped him onto the runway so there was no point in doing a go around

Raj Shivpur: Not an awesome job at all, when he made the wrong decisions to land and almost crashed the plane. No praise from me. He should’ve diverted to a safer airport. There are 200 or 300 precious souls on board. This is not an air show. This is not acrobatics. Shame shame shame.

LOLLO LOLLO

Pucker factor....

*LOL!!!*

@BKK he means they were afraid...

I will never salute a pilot who puts 200+ souls at risk because he is too stupid to divert to a safer airport, or to find a better oriented runway, or to go around. Very bad decision deserves no praise at all. Sure he has flying skills, maybe he can join the flying Circus, he should not be flying around passengers with brainless decisions like that.

@@steveperreira5850 why would you say that? the landing was a sucess and professional...

No RESPONSIBLE pilot would drink beer, ok? They'd go for only whisky or vodka.

@@thangnguyen02 Or Champagne 😂

+Bob Lake I'm sure EVERYONE would be changing underwear and throwing up!!! I can only imagine being a passenger looking out the side and thinking this could be the end....

Ur ryt

+Bob Lake I bet not.

cabin crew always change underwear after the flight lands but most often this happens when they are leaving the bed with pilot to board for their return journey

But if the crew were all females, they probably didn't have any underwear on or it was only around their ankles?

stay away from cars. many times more dangerous than planes. esp these days. nothing ever happens pretty much :) Fly to Hawai'i! LOL

I hate long flights aswell but if you wanna travel and see this beautifull world.....

The stats for traffic deaths are terrifying. Airliners count accidents with 0.something in a million flights.

@@mahumike7531 Hawaii was well worth the annoying af 12 hour plane ride and airport stop offs.

You missed the part where he never lost control, he planned that maneuver because it was the only way (swaying back and forth) to at least predict the flight path being perfectly vertical and horizontal at one point in the sway.

+Steve Vincent "If it's not a Boeing, I'm landing in the trees (Air France Flight 320)"

"If it's not a fokker then...well... everyone can go fuck themselves"

snoopyloopy that's me I've seen too much Airbus crashes

I love your comment Nadir lmao everyone who watches videos like these instantly recognizes your reference.

snoopyloopy it has nothing to do with the machine, it's who's in control.

Let us now proceed to understand what makes a good computer programme or a good pilot to control planes in any condition. It all had to do with the capacity of the sensors in the engineering or the pilot human detection system, I have to speak mathematically. There are sensors to pick up at least three parameters in AMPLITUDE, VELOCITY ACCELERATION in any dimension of pitch, roll, and yaw, and the similar information in error in height, drift to port and starboard and distance ahead to target. If a pilot is new he would control using positional error, which could be delayed and so the plane would oscillate and never fly a steady route. If the pilot can detect the rate of change in any dimension mentioned then he can control better as he need not achieve a position to know that there is a position error in the making. If the pilot can detect that the plane is accelerating in any of the variables mentioned then he can counteract the action by using acceleration errors which is even better than detecting the velocity in a particular variable. In a storm where there could be FAST external inputs due to wind etc, the pilot would be more equipped if he could detect what comes before acceleration. Thus a high calibre pilot would apply his controls before the plane gains an error in velocity or position that is if the plane is accelerating he would apply the counterpart of that at the acceleration state and so there will be no acceleration and so the plane will hold its position. He could not do that if the pilot waits for the plane to have a positional error as that is too late for fast stormy external inputs. All this is called derivative control as it needs to be fast. In long distance flights there is an integral control which detects the error in position and integrates it slowly and if this has a value it would be fed to the control system to cancel the error. It is going the other way to what is required to correct long time errors and it is called Integral Control For fast immediate control in a storm one needs to detect, many errors, the particular amplitude of an error, the rate of change or the error(velocity) and the rate of change of velocity( acceleration) and the rate of change of acceleration ( ????) and the rate of change of the rate of change of acceleration, the higher order derivative one can go the better pilot he is for fast immediate control of internal and external errors. For error in long distance flights one needs to know the integral of the positional error. All this can be processed by a good human brain/ mind, ( once he knows all this) but normally a new pilot or one with few brain cells he could only handle positional errors and so he would oscillate the control as when someone learns a car for the first time. The delay in noticing the positional error and reacting to it is too long. If a pilot can quickly detect that the plane is accelerating in any particular error then the pilot applies control BEFORE the plane takes up a velocity or a positional error. From what I can see in this video, the pilot was detecting the acceleration of the roll and pitch, but he was holding it for too long causing the plane to oscillate a little. I would not say that all this is beyond the capacity of a human pilot and to learn faster a pilot should not just fly his plane with holding the stick in the same position, but he should CONTINUOUSLY move the stick giving an internal STEP error and then apply the next move so that he would steady the action without overshoot. My 10 year old daughter and I flew as passengers in small planes and obviously my daughter had to sit beside the pilot who gave her the stick to handle the plane. As I had told her about continuously moving the stick in continuous steps as in a PULSE WIDTH MODULATION system, she did just that, to follow the coast and within five minutes she felt the reaction of the plane to the step input and decreased the magnitude of the step input till the stick was being moved in minute steps so minutely at the right time when the plane was accelerating that it could not be detected by the pilot who insisted than my daughter had flown before. On a higher inertia craft as a 5,000 ton passenger ferry, on which the Masters appreciated my contribution as an engineer, they often gave me the wheel to see how I perform. I did what I always do to learn to handle new craft, I gave square error control and saw how the ship reacted when the ship had gathered pitch momentum. To aim for the target port, I applied rudder much before the bow faced port as that would have been too late. I kept that ship as straight as an arrow., irrespective of wave motion and wind speed.......... where the captain accused me that I had done it all before which I had never done before, and what I told him...................... Sir, as engineers we do more mathematics than you do and so I know exactly what to detect and react for it before the amplitude and velocity errors are integrated. So my advise to all pilots is ................ do not train your eyes to detect amplitude error in yaw, roll, pitch , height, errors to port starboard or how far from target................... at least operate on detecting the accelerations in each individual variable and reacting to it at the acceleration stage, not its velocity not its position. If you can train yourself to detect that what comes before acceleration ................ then you can fly in typhoons and land an A380 on an aircraft carrier, even without an arresting hook. With side winds you can still do it as all one needs is to set the state of the neutral positions of rudder, elevator , ailerons to an new value and take the stick control errors relative to this new value. Happy flying in all weather and please do think what engineers do for you and what signals are processed in silence and unseen, when you go in automatic control system!!! Learn it well so that you can save your lives.

Sorry folks , an Error, the ship gathered YAW momentum not pitch.......momentum about a vertical axis which could be arrested at a particular position by the application of the rudder at the right time.

holy shit ok we get it you're smart about planes but u don't have to write a fucking book about it but thanks for the info anyways

no profile picture, Sir, you completely misunderstood, it was not planes that I wrote about, but the signal processing that need to be done on any life situation. From your own answer, I do understand. Thanks for replying.

looked a bit wonky to me

The pilots took an unnecessary risk with the passengers under these terrible conditions, there were better alternatives, you know it if you are a pilot, there is no need to praise what happened here, this is not an air show and this is not acrobatics. Shameful, just shameful, all the pilot worshipers out there, what a disgraceful situation. I’m a pilot to and I know how to land in adverse cross wind conditions and I don’t need any lectures about how I wish I could do it. I would never do it like that with passengers on board. With my own plane and only me on board, I like doing Crosswind Landing’s, kind of exciting. But this is not excusable, risking lives of innocent passengers.

swiss001? XD

@@rodan8824 maybe

Hahahaha

@ Arthur... Ha, Ha, Ha… MADE MY DAY!!!

No "$h!t"!

they already went around twice and were running on fumes...It was Do or Die...you shouldn't comment on a subject you don't know all the facts to

@@NBD96 dude its a joke ofc i dont know jack about the full story

It is still an extremely tough crosswind landing, try setting it to 0.75 speed, that looks more like normal speed, as you see it isnt easy

Then you try that landing at any speed.

It's sped up to about twice the normal speed. It definitely looks much more dramatic that reality.

So they landed that Fokker somehow!

It just takes an unstable approach and not having everything sorted to land by the time you get to decision altitude.

Everywhere i go, i see Rynair pilots venerated xD

@@shivankkumar5947 LIKEEE

HERES ONE

Did you actually wondered how to land a 300 ton widebody airliner with 50 kts crosswinds?

Bunch of 12 year olds 😂😂

“Whites”

💀💀