REEEEEEEEEEEEE NOT LIKE THAT!!

Freedom of speech doesnt matter to your private workplace, Freeeeedumbbbb also has consequences. You can compare vaccines to holocaust ALLL YOU WANT. Outside of Disneyland. Freedom!

so non gqp points are getting deleted.. lol ok christian sheep. #separationofchurchandstate

It's more like "who WE decide deserves to speak her mind" lol.

They pick and choose. Example, woke writers/activists hop onto X and insult fans all the time. Most of them don't lose their jobs. Yet Gina lost her job. That double standard should already be enough to drastically help her case in court.

She’s sueing in federal court; where being a dunce isn’t a protected class.

Correction: I meant to say conservative, not dunce.

​@@jayray1714 Protected class or not, defamation is defamation. And the fact that she can point at Pedro Pascal - who posted similar political social media content - and clearly show that he was given preferential treatment while she was discharged and defamed, makes her case pretty strong.

@@edwells8963 Protected class is in regards to the discrimination case, the bulk of the lawsuit. As far as defemation goes, what did Disney say that wasn’t true? Remember, very important, it’s not defemation if it’s true. “Whatabout whatabout whatabout” doesn’t hold up in court. Bringing up Pedro’s posts(which are not at all similar) will not help her case as they’re different messages coming from a different place(love vs hate).

@@jayray1714 Disney said her "social media posts denigrating people based on their cultural and religious identities are abhorrent and unacceptable". The defamation part of the trial is disputing that any such thing happened. She said the culture war was being used to divide and dehumanize people, just like 1940s Germany used small social differences to divide races and religion. Where's the denigration? Also Pedro's tweets are exactly relevant to the discrimination case; a male co-star also made inflammatory posts, but got away with it (because it was company endorsed rhetoric). It hardly seems unreasonable.

I think your odds are way off. Disney's stock would take off it were run competently, so it wouldn't be a financial loss for Musk (or a group of like-minded investors). If Peltz doesn't get board seats, it wouldn't surprise me to see a couple of deep-pocket partners join Peltz and Musk in a hostile takeover.

That would be the ideal outcome fs. I think Elon is more likely trying to buy shares with Ike Perlmutter so that they can gain majority shares and stage a company takeover, giving Bob Iger (and hopefully Kathleen Kennedy) the boot

Well he has some pretty rich friends

It wouldn't be the first time one of his joke purchases turned into a real one. That's how he got Twitter.

If he succeeds then the sjw mind virus may just finally begin to break. I cant wait to go back to a time when I dont have to avoid speaking my mind before finding out what popular opinion is. It is disgusting that we have to conform or fear reprisals right now.

haha nice

Gina Carano:"To protect the world from wrongful termination!" Elon Musk:"To unite all chads within our nation!"

@@someguyontheinternet2399 To denounce the evils of Iger and Kennedy

@@someguyontheinternet2399 Gina Carano: Gina! Elon Musk: Elon! Nelson Pelts: Nelson that’s right.

@@someguyontheinternet2399Gina Carrano: To denounce the Evils of Lies and Woke!

We can call at Disney strikes back

Calling Elon a rebel is like calling Walter White a rebel. But the rest is so true 😂

​@@markmickmanCan you explain what you meant by that?

Who’s the rebel? The richest man on the planet who owns one of the largest social media companies on the planet?

@@jayray1714 I guess Elon Musk is Princess Leia and Gina is Luke.

your "really strong female" put this on top of the lawsuit paper: "i as a women was discirminated against compared to my men collegues". thats your hero right there. hypocrites.

Agreed, the pseudo strong females in their content are laughable. Good point

Do we love so irony here. :D Its like poetry it rhymes

They’re gonna see it; and embarrass her and Elon in front of the world. Why do some people have such a humiliation fetish. She has no case.

@@alesksanderpoetic justice

Just like how Disney is burning right now.

​@@JustTooDamnHonestthanks, I wasn't sure what the allegory he was going for was until you explained it.

Not to mention all the abusive, hateful ranting that comes from 'the woke' all day every day.

Indeed. The biggest boundary they have is that they do not want diversity of thought. Anyone with different politics, they want fired or not to hire in the first place. Everyone who works for them in some position of power is always Democratic/left leaning/feminist.

The average person is looking at this and going ‘good, Disney dropped a bigot.’ The PR is great for Disney. And the Discovery, is gonna be even better for Disney when they make a compilation of all the dumb sh_t she says.

@@jayray1714 we shall see

@@jayray1714keep telling yourself that

​@jayray1714 I wanna know why you're all over this vid posting comments taking the side of a soulless corporation that unjustly fired a woman who dared to have an opinion over that woman who didn't cower to bullying? You must work at Disney then because it really sounds like you're on the wrong team here.

She took it to federal court

How? Disney is gonna make a massive compilation of dunce statements and tweets Gina has said for the public to see. Discovery will favor Disney.

@@jayray1714 Everyone has already seen what Gina has said. The world hasn't seen internal Disney communications.

The Bismarck with its damaged rudder, helplessly turning in circles, certainly sounds about right.

​@rjsouthworth5246 Nah Disney is the Prince of Wales. Hood is sunk and the quad cannons aren't working.

@ryanb9749 Prince of Wales was sunk in the South Pacific by the Japanese. The Hood was sunk by the Bismarck in the North Atlantic

@OR56 yes. But the POW was the Hoods escort when it was sunk, and it retreated.

He's distracting the weak-minded from all his other woes. Tesla stock dropping, Twitter in the shitter, Hyperloop failing, Boring Company failing, SpaceX getting slapped, etc.

​@@thomasbecker9676Twitter in the shitter? Wasn't Twitter literally unprofitable before he took it over? And how on earth would "distracting" the public help him if all those things were true? 🧐 Keep coping.

@@JadeRunner Correct me if I'm wrong, but Twitter has taken huge financial losses and advertisers have fled in droves since your glorious leader Elon took over. I know you hope stanning for Elon will somehow result in him allowing you to fellate him, but you need to hope in one hand, and shit into the other.

@@thomasbecker9676if I had a nickel for every chuckle head that insists that twitter was better off before Elon took over, I’d be able to buy Disney.

@@JadeRunner Twitter is even less profitable now. He took a company that was struggling, and made it significantly worse. You desperately defending him is cope

This is my daydream.

Elon still owes 10 billion for twitter, he's tanked tesla stock. Byd have overtaken tesla. Where is Elon getting the money to buy Disney?

@@Ob1sdarkside Tanked Tesla? It's down 3 bucks on the year. LOL It's 3 times the market cap of Disney. He has 10 billion lost in the cushions of his couch. StarLink is killing it. SpaceX lifts 80% of all cargo into orbit worldwide now. Tell me again how he's a failure?

@@Ob1sdarkside Nowhere, Iger needs to do much "better" to make the company affordable for him. He can, however, buy a nice amount of shares.

@@walkir2662 If Iger keeps going the way he's going, which looks likely. Musk would be able to buy a decent stock holding. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.

Yall love unsubstantiated rumors. Imma need a source they’re trying to settle, your fav grifter YTers are not a source

Other actors and entities in lucasfilm and disney were publicly making much worse comments than Gina's but they were aimed at conservatives and not only were they ignored by the management, they were publicly and authoritatively backed up.

It's worse than that. Zegler was on company time. She was doing red carpet crap with her costar. The movie is effectively DOA now. You'd think there would be some sort of public apology, but nope, nothing. Gina says we shouldn't treat people as 'other' and she gets fired for it. Absolutely wild.

The big smoking gun here is that Pedro Pascal had previously done exactly what they claim they fired Gina for - repeatedly, before _and_ after Gina did it, and with nowhere near the same level of respect and dignity that Gina did it. Seriously, look at Pascal's tweets and selfie videos talking about Trump supporters. The guy is unhinged and full of rage, hate and malice. He outright says "people who like Donald Trump are Nazis" with glee and venom. Pascal has faced exactly zero consequences from Disney for his history of this. This is the part that Disney is going to have a very hard time explaining in court - why only one of their actors was fired for something they both did while the other wasn't even reprimanded. And in our current political cIimate, the fact that the one who was fired is female while the one who was given a pass was male is only going to make it even harder to explain, especially for a company that has made "fighting misogyny" their main core brand value over the last decade. To be clear, in a perfect world I believe Disney has the right to fire whoever they want for whatever reason they want. I also think if Disney wants to be an openly partisan political organisation ie anti-Trump and anti-Trump-suppoters, they have every right to be. But Disney deny being partisan and claim partisan politics had nothing to do with Gina's firing. Furthermore, Disney have spent the last decade screwing others over in the name of these values they themselves have violated, so the issue here is really about Disney's hypocrisy, inconsistency and quadruple standards, so I'm all in favor of seeing them suffer for this.

@@JadeRunnerexactly. I would parrot the whole “they’re a company they can fire who they want” if they actually applied it equally.

@@JadeRunner Well, the best part of this is California state law prohibits the firing of an employee for their political affiliation. So no, they don't have the right to fire her for the reason they did. They can't possibly prove they did it because her words damaged the brand. Their treatment of Pascal proves as much. This lawsuit is gonna be juicy.

I'm all for that. Anything that removes Bob Iger would make me happy

that would be very progressive for disney! they could have a woman as their CEO! if you pitched it that way, i wouldnt be shocked of those monkeys actually liked the idea

@@rootigaroot9922yeah but Disney wouldn’t want her as CEO, because she’s not a women that has the same political views as them.

That would be the worst job.

its about money. her career is in the gutter. its about money. also..."i'm an innocent women, i was mistreated compared to men"....is her first entry in the lawsuit.

It's certainly not about money if Musk is behind it

A wise man once said "It's the principal of the thing"

Elon lacks principles.

She’s asking for the role back cause all she can get is crappy Daily Wire movies.. it’s about the money

a company can get rid of personal they don't align with. love or hate it, thats the freedom we have in the US. now go away. or i start telling Elon what to do...and watch your pitchfork come outl.

​@@TNM001Yea they can right up until it's discrimination. Which Disney seems to be actively doing.

Speak their mind? Dude she's an idiot who said some really dumb things

@@randomcharacter6501 ding ding ding. Most people forget that the discrimination laws include political opinions too. All of those laws were written with the McCarthy events being fresh in people's minds.

@@randomcharacter6501 I thought it was about defamation.

The real Phase 5

That and reinstate the expanded universe.

Mandalorian is wildly successful

Gina isn't going anywhere with this case

@@YTChannel420 maybe, maybe not but it’s not so much about winning or losing as it is showing Disney/hollywood that people won’t put up with this anymore.

@@GundamMeister357 Lol, this is going to blow over, and people like you will conveniently forget about how wrong you were.

@@thomasbecker9676 ok

She will 100% settle (if it even gets that far) because there is absolutely nothing supporting her case. She wasn't fired, her contract was expiring and it just wasn't renewed. That's literally how most contracts work.

"Ahhh, when you're right, you're right. And you? You're always right!".

Some articles say she's suing to be re-cast. Maybe they just want to make her look bitter and desperate? She should be going after money money money and I hope that's what this is.

Spaceballs 😂😂😂😂😂

Gimme paw! AWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWA!! 🤣

At most it’s pay for a few episodes! That’s all she lost.

When can we start calling it Twix? Everybody loves a Twix.

Coupled with a possible Second term for the bad orange man in the Whitehouse? They will go apeshit!

Despite Iger's best attempts, Disney's too expensive.

Nice to see my comment is just gone but youtube still delivers reply updates as though my comment is still there.

Elon can't afford it.

@@walkir2662 It's more likely the internal proxy fight will put Peltz and Perlmutter in charge than Elon swooping in and taking over. That's probably what this is really about. Musk is supporting the board takeover

Gina was horribly treated, and to take on this giant company for her termination would have been way beyond her means. What other choice did she have but to walk away and suffer the humiliation dumped upon her? Elon, because he can, reached out and said, "I got your back." It's a dream come true. The big guy standing up for the little guy.

​@@myoldmategood that Elon is doing that, but it's terrible that he *needs* too in order for her case to have a chance.

@Sandwiches. it is, but going to court is horribly expensive if you end up on the losing side.

perhaps another question to ask is why haven't any rich and powerful women stepped up to support Gina?

You actually think Elon is doing this for altruistic reasons?

I hope it goes further, I hope it gos to the point where the judge says, ‘Gina.. you really write these tweets? Are you a &$@$ing moron or something?”

No amount of will get Gina to shut up. She's in it for the truth to be put out into the public.

They're actively trying to burn at _least_ $300,000,000 on a new _Pirates of the Carribean_ they're going to give _The Little Mermaid_ treatment to, all without Johnny Depp.

That's exactly where the confidence comes from. Disney is in hellfire and pretending everything is okay for some deranged reason and continues to double down on their agenda despite the obvious financial leakage but this is a bluff and a sign of weakness so if noted figures will test waters and sue, perhaps they might succeed since they feel Disney is this delusional.

Yes it's still pocket change to them, but I hope they go the distance to teach the biotches of Disney a lesson.

As the blackrock money keeps coming then sadly yes, but that could dry up at anytime.

Nearly ever line in this vid is a wrong

Well, they couldn’t tick her “gay” and “lame” checkboxes. So she was fair game.

That would make a great book...

@@samdherring well, it would make an okay book that leans too hard on its pile of references. But the weird thing is, you end up reading it more often than some of your other, better books.

That would be fun!

Apologize for what?

Fair enough to Gina, I hope she wins. Elon on the other hand couldn’t give a fig about free speech in Eastern Europe as long as his buddy Putin gets his way.

She won’t. She’ll embarrass herself.

Extremely, especially for Disney. Though.. doesn’t matter much, her contract ran out, she wasn’t fired.

Lmao wtf

yes, as was stated in the lawsuit, we need to stand with an "innocent women who was discriminated aganst compared to her male collegues". i love when strong females suddenly become weak and defensless when it suits them.

At the very least I’m watching with a tub of popcorn and my tinfoil hat ready.

@@albusvoltavern4500 I'm just saying, with him among the ultra rich in the future, I'm just waiting till this timeline goes full on Cyberpunk.

Nice to see someone able to admit they're a fan of the blood gemstone industry.

It is, actually. California state law says it's illegal to fire an employee for their political affiliation. So she's good from that angle too.

@@jackinthebox301 Learn something new every day. That seems like an astonishingly sensible law. I just wonder how often/fairly it is enforced in a state like California.

@@Zayphar Yeah, that's the wild card here. Will a judge in California be a-political enough to follow the law? God, what happened to our country that I have to say that.

@@jackinthebox301 A-she wasn’t fired. B-she took it to federal court.

It’s not slander if it’s true.

Yeah calm your tits. They aren't doing anything to disney

Although I guess in this analogy instead of weapons, he started with a funny car for douches in California to drive.

Bezos is Lex Luthor, lol.

@ChimenExpress You know what else Elon and Walt are both called? The futurist. Not a coincidence.

You're a fool, then.

Well realistically any time the treatment of Jews in WW2 comes up, or especially gets used in comparison/metaphor, people get their panties in a bunch. So in that respect, I would argue that what Carano said WAS controversial. But 1) It was significantly less controversial than the similar post made by Pedro Pascal, and he didn't get fired. And 2) just because what Carano said could be considered controversial, doesn't mean it wasn't true. Also Disney's assertion that her comments were "denigrating" to minorities was a bunch of dishonest, emotionally manipulative crap. Nothing about what Carano said denigrated anybody. She just made the point that people shouldn't hate each other for their political views, and that continuing to do so could lead to worse things. Which is a perfectly reasonable opinion.

Yep. It's unclear if she's suing for wrongful termination, defamation, or both. If defamation, that's a tall order when you're a public person. The quote she references is "... her social media posts denigrating people based on their cultural & religious identities are abhorrent & unacceptable.”

@@LedPage Lets take a moment to let it sink in that the left has literally stooped to defending nazis.

To make matters worse, I sorely doubt that Disney-an extremely litigious corporation with a century's worth of experience in the courtroom-would have worded a statement regarding an employee's termination in a manner that exposes them to future litigation.