Drones Swarm Langley AFB?

  Рет қаралды 46,480

C.W. Lemoine

C.W. Lemoine

2 ай бұрын

Mover and Gonky Discuss Recent Reports of Drones Swarming Langley - home of the F-22. www.twz.com/air/mysterious-dr... Join the channel to watch LIVE every Monday at 8PM ET or to see full episodes of The Mover and Gonky Show. You can also join in on LIVE Q&As with the Mover Mailbag: / @cwlemoine Monday at 8PM ET, Mover (F-16, F/A-18, T-38, 737, helicopter pilot, author, cop, and wanna be race car driver) and Gonky (F/A-18, T-38, A320, dirt bike racer, author, and awesome dad) discuss everything from aviation to racing to life and anything in between.
Send your voice message for the show: podcasters.spotify.com/pod/sh...
Looking for a good book? www.cwlemoine.com
The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement.
Views presented are my own and do not represent the views of DoD or its Components.

Пікірлер: 467
@bigbritx8824
@bigbritx8824 2 ай бұрын
I work with a major league team who has a drone detection system on their stadium. This system can not only track any drone located within 40-50 miles of their stadium, BUT it can also pinpoint where the drone pilot is so law enforcement can apprehend. I find it INCREDIBLY hard to believe our military bases don’t have similar or better tech installed than what’s available commercially. In this case, if there are hundreds of drones, they should be able to see where the pilot(s) are.
@bigbritx8824
@bigbritx8824 2 ай бұрын
unless the drones are just tech beyond their capacity to detect #UFO
@bigbritx8824
@bigbritx8824 2 ай бұрын
I’m with Gonky on this one
@DSTsucks
@DSTsucks 2 ай бұрын
I bet they're tracking drones with the FAA ID turned on. You can turn that off if you want. Consumer drones have maps built in and they will not allow you to fly into a restricted area, like an AFB, but you can defeat that also.
@neingermanspies1507
@neingermanspies1507 2 ай бұрын
​@DSTsucks There's RF detectors that can pick up the radio frequencies from the drone and the contoller and track them that way.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
@jerseyshoredroneservices225 2 ай бұрын
Bigbrit I'm not an authority on the topic but I have been paying pretty good attention for a few years. Chances are that your airport has Aeroscope which is a DJI product. It locates DJI drones, not any drone.
@boblynch2802
@boblynch2802 2 ай бұрын
Not heard a peep of this anywhere else.
@tehpw7574
@tehpw7574 2 ай бұрын
No prof so this topic is not first page material (until it actually happens)... twenty years ago? this topic would be Tin foil material. Now? It's legit and is Wheel Box material. Ukraine is the prime proof that this is a DANGER. I don't care what the media says. What I do care about is if the collective DoD is ear marking this in their annual budgets and companies that can make a $ are looking into this as future Oppurtunites... Big Navy is already big in this (to the point of creation of a whole new warfare community) so I hope the other services are doing something...
@0x80O0oOverfl0w
@0x80O0oOverfl0w 2 ай бұрын
Have you tried Google? 204,000 results for "drone swarm langley"
@FirstDagger
@FirstDagger 2 ай бұрын
WB-57 Canberra my beloved. Thing is older than the B-52.
@BasedF-15Pilot
@BasedF-15Pilot 2 ай бұрын
Fatty U-2.
@0x80O0oOverfl0w
@0x80O0oOverfl0w 2 ай бұрын
Awesome aircraft, saw it in person when I was overseas. Has a bit of a U-2 vibe to it.
@ashhawk2346
@ashhawk2346 Ай бұрын
Had to google it.. I'm sure i've seen her before but damn she's a beauty!
@sb859
@sb859 2 ай бұрын
1 guy in a RV inside an RV park can swarm an airbase with killer drones can take out BILLIONS of dollars worth of aircraft. Most of which can't be replaced (any jet that is out of production). We will need advanced EW and sensor equipment at EVERY airbase to find/fix/track the control node, which could even be unmanned with AI. I'm afraid we're asleep at the wheel. Any Chinese owned property near bases needs to be reclaimed through Eminent Domain. Wow.
@ecleveland1
@ecleveland1 2 ай бұрын
You are correct. The Pentagon should be freaking out over this. Enough foreign men and women for that matter have entered this country illegally and could cripple our country in one single day and it would take years for us to recover. Our politicians have been stupid for allowing this.
@Ef554rgcc
@Ef554rgcc 2 ай бұрын
How is that done exactly?
@A_barrel
@A_barrel 2 ай бұрын
Bruh there's nothing advanced about drone jamming. Jam the frequency they're on, simple they'll fall out of the sky or even land. If it's internally navigated, microwaves will fry it and it'll fall out of the sky. Not like airbases don't have cushion for space
@eanders7992
@eanders7992 2 ай бұрын
@@Ef554rgcc What part? The RV part, the advanced EW stuff, or the taking of property owned by foreign entities near our military bases???
@Ef554rgcc
@Ef554rgcc 2 ай бұрын
@@eanders7992 1 guy in an RV parking a swarm for use.
@Alicatt1
@Alicatt1 2 ай бұрын
The US military banned DJI drones for a while as the Phantom series drones would "phone home" with the images and data from the memory card mounted in the onboard controller. Then there was the issue with the FitBit watches and Strava which revealed a few of the US bases in Syria and Afghanistan
@gnarlycarlson9600
@gnarlycarlson9600 2 ай бұрын
RB 57 has a tremendous camera system used to video rocket launches, can get close clear photos from very far away
@jb6027
@jb6027 2 ай бұрын
One would think they'd know that. But no. The government doesn't keep 3 RB-57s active just for nostalgia.
@starkparker16
@starkparker16 2 ай бұрын
I'm with Mover on this one.
@christophergreen3538
@christophergreen3538 2 ай бұрын
As a supply vessel captain in the Gulf, I've seen these things on radar that don't show visually. Also, have seen the weird lights out there too, many times.
@memoryhold
@memoryhold 2 ай бұрын
If you get a moment, I would really like to hear more about your experience detecting them in the Gulf (or anywhere). Are you able to elaborate on the radar aspect of it? And can you describe the lights in as best detail that you can recall? I'm really interested in hearing, and I think it's important
@neurofiedyamato8763
@neurofiedyamato8763 2 ай бұрын
Uh well radar sometimes doesn't filter out all clutter and there's a lot of clutter in the ocean from birds to fish to large ocean waves etc. Same with lights which can be planes, other ships, or even stuff from ashore. Or bioluminescent animals.
@christophergreen3538
@christophergreen3538 2 ай бұрын
@neurofiedyamato8763 dude, stfu. You don't have a clue.
@Vexas345
@Vexas345 2 ай бұрын
NASA was doing UAS tests in December at the CERTAIN ranges on Langley while all these drone reports were coming in. I'm betting the WB-57 was there for that.
@Milesobrian
@Milesobrian 2 ай бұрын
The chinese have farmland all around our bases too.
@danielr3933
@danielr3933 2 ай бұрын
Im sure it's been talked about but its crazy how most of these incidents could be linked to China. The best way to destroy a Country is from within and we should be concerned with the abiliity of the Chinese to buy our lands, amongst other things. What better way for a Chinese national to better their standing in their homeland than to send things like data back to the mainland.
@pistonburner6448
@pistonburner6448 2 ай бұрын
When they switch to farming melons, then we should get ready.
@ptsteinbach
@ptsteinbach 2 ай бұрын
If you’re talking about Travis AFB, it turned out to be a group of real estate investors trying to build a very large planned community.
@obsidianjane4413
@obsidianjane4413 2 ай бұрын
Your racism is showing.
@pistonburner6448
@pistonburner6448 2 ай бұрын
@@obsidianjane4413 Your idiocy and spinelessness is showing.
@moseskelly2886
@moseskelly2886 2 ай бұрын
It's very impressive how the United States has the talent to maintain our military vehicles and aircraft for a very long time. I think it's awesome, to see aircraft that my relatives could've flown still flying.
@Indypacecar82
@Indypacecar82 2 ай бұрын
WB-57 is used for many missions. Nasa uses it for high altitude photography of rocket launches. Very accurate, high resolving camera system
@hoghogwild
@hoghogwild 2 ай бұрын
You can pay to play payloads aboard NASA WB-57 as well.
@deanwilliams433
@deanwilliams433 2 ай бұрын
I completely agree with Mover. Drones with even basic image processing tech are a serious threat to national security. They are easy to manufacture and most of their capabilities are in the software side which any country can do. I think of a country like Croatia that recently acquired 12 used Dassault Rafale jets for around 1.21B USD, that is a huge amount of money for a country of that size. For that same amount they could have created a domestic drone production pipeline that can handle all of their needs in terms of airspace surveillance and defense. I think for the money, traditional fighter aircraft will not make sense for many of these countries that have small to medium budgets in comparison to drones.
@rogerbordine7
@rogerbordine7 2 ай бұрын
It’s a 2 pronged problem though so both drones and fighters are needed. Most developed nations have both. 90% of drones are short range, and 90% can’t go above 200mph, not to mention many drones can be disarmed via ELINT, and have a small load capacity if any at all. So a fighter’s range, speed, weapons load, and pilot’s hands-on capabilities are still essential to any battlefield. What i think is being overlooked is the fact that the EWO on planes like the Growler and Eagle II may soon be tasked with managing slave drones, along with AWACS. That’s the best way for fighters to stay relevant in this particular type of “swarm” warfare scenario.
@deanwilliams433
@deanwilliams433 2 ай бұрын
@@rogerbordine7 I don't disagree, but still you can design and develop UAVs in addition to drones for less than what Croatia paid for just 12 used planes.
@dbod9815
@dbod9815 2 ай бұрын
The Drone and the Operator are both transmitting (UHF?). I assume radio triangulation could be used to detect and pinpoint each?
@edwardfletcher7790
@edwardfletcher7790 2 ай бұрын
Only if the drones are under direct control. If they're flying a GPS programmed return route, there's no signal to track. Also, only video surveillance drones send a signal. Drones are completely capable of recording video or photo's to a uSD memory card and returning without ANY signal at all.
@damongraham1398
@damongraham1398 2 ай бұрын
@@edwardfletcher7790 don't GPS send out signals also?
@enigmatic51me95
@enigmatic51me95 2 ай бұрын
DJI drones use 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz bands...Your assuming they would use the same freq. If these guys are that good they would not use these freq. It would custom made. No Geo fencing to inhibit its travel.
@edwardfletcher7790
@edwardfletcher7790 2 ай бұрын
@@damongraham1398 Only GPS satellites send the signais. Every GPS device is reception only.
@damongraham1398
@damongraham1398 2 ай бұрын
@@edwardfletcher7790 thank you I thought they sent and received.
@anonimous_user7318
@anonimous_user7318 2 ай бұрын
The WB-57 was probably to try and image the local area and look for the drone controller's radio emissions. I think some kind of anti-drone jamming technology or kinetic anti-drone system will be needed to counter attacks from radio-controlled and autonomous drone systems respectively.
@FunnyQuailMan
@FunnyQuailMan 2 ай бұрын
It absolutely blows my mind that there isn't any real, clearly apparent effort to combat these drone incursions into restricted airspace over sensitive facilities. This kind of thing has been happening for at least, like, 7 years, and there's still not even a shared idea of how to respond & deal with them. Apparently, there's only just been a "90-day review" started to maybe think about thinking about a way to kinda do something about something or something... Maybe. Thing is, I live by a nuclear power plant, and there wasn't even a mention, in the news or anywhere, until almost a year and a half later that, in 2017, a *series* of incursions, each by *several* large quadcopter drones observed and/or heard from the ground by security guards who reported that the drones were anywhere from (the guards said was) just a few dozen feet to over a thousand feet off the ground and maneuvering in repeated & clearly purposeful patterns above different sections of the plant, with each incursion lasting at least 90 minutes between the hours of 1:00AM & 4:00AM each time, over a different section each time, in an apparently methodical order - over a ***NUCLEAR-THE-FU€K-POWER PLANT!!!*** And nobody did anything except document it, notify their "bosses" or whatever, and, eventually, after a few nights of this, inform the police who eventually passed the reports along to the FAA, who apparently filed 'em away, forgot about' em, and then took their sweet time digging 'em back up before redacting the reports & releasing them over a year and a half after the fact, and only because a local reporter who'd heard the story from a friend of one of the security guards had filed a FOIA request. Nobody ever so much as bothered to try to find out who they belonged to, where they came from, or why they were there, even after it dawned on some people at the FAA that this same exact thing had happened & was still happening over the restricted airspace of *at least half a dozen* other nuclear plants, and some anectodal reports going around the water cooler which suggested at least a dozen more nuclear plants experienced such series of incursions that either weren't observed & reported, or just weren't really noticed except incidentally and had only been vaguely mentioned & poorly recalled months or over a year later when other reports started being talked about. And several of the plants noted one or more repeat series of incursions happening months apart. About a year after that, an electrician for the area power company near my house noticed, stuck in a tree just a few yards from a very large substation, a quadcopter drone with a length of heavy-gauge copper wire just a couple feet or so longer than the width between the high-voltage lines of the substation and bent into hooks at either end. Apparently, had it not gotten stuck in the tree, that drone could have laid that copper wire across any 2 of those high-voltage lines to effectively cause the substation to blow itself up. They informed their "higher ups" who, at least claimed to have, informed the local PD, and nothing else ever happened. That substation is still, right now, exposed just as it was then 3 or 4 years ago, and is still without a proper surrounding fence. They haven't even bothered to just tie some netting over top of it, or throw something up there between the tree branches to catch anything that might fall on it, on purpose or not, and knock out power to thousands upon thousands of people for probably a couple of days, at least.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
@jerseyshoredroneservices225 2 ай бұрын
Nuclear power plants and dams are designed to withstand missile strikes and bombings. Drones other than large military drones are really no threat to facilities like that. Contrary to popular belief most of those sites are not restricted airspace. There's an FAA website that shows what airspace is restricted for drones. You can find it by searching "faa visualize it". Keep in mind that even in controlled and restricted airspace there are avenues to get authorization to fly. You shouldn't assume that any drone flying in an area that you think is off limits, is doing something wrong.
@MattH-wg7ou
@MattH-wg7ou 2 ай бұрын
So much of our infrastructure is painfully vulnerable. And with our open border thousands of Chinese nationals, could be spies, sleeper cells, etc are entering every year.
@enginerdy
@enginerdy 2 ай бұрын
So, a couple of things. The airspace over nuclear power plants is not restricted. It may not be legal to fly drones there in your area, but it’s not restricted airspace. There are stories about local cops trying to arrest airplane pilots for loitering near plants, but it’s explicitly not illegal, and the cops had to apologize. Considering the design of the containment dome, it’s not remotely a kinetic risk. Second, it’s likely that that length of wire would go up in a puff of smoke if it was laid across the transmission lines. It may have even been a maintenance drone that was lost? One thing that needs to be done during service is placing a grounding wire on a de-energized wire to keep it from acquiring dangerous voltage through proximity.
@Thunderbyrd.
@Thunderbyrd. 2 ай бұрын
There is anti-drone technology that will either disable the drone and it will fall out of the sky, or it can take over the drone's controls and the anti-drone operators can land the drone safely. There are even battlefield systems that can be carried by soldiers and it's in the shape and size of a rifle. The fact that Langley was unable to control and/or take these drones out leads me to believe the drones were not consumer drones or commercial drones. Which means the drones were using systems we don't have an answer for meaning it could be drone tech that is more advanced than the US's technology. So that leaves China, (maybe, it's possible)or it's Russia (which I doubt it very seriously since they copy everyone else's tech). Or the only one left would be Non=Human Intelligence (NHI). Which could be from outer space or inner dimensional X Files stuff.
@Solid615
@Solid615 2 ай бұрын
Yeah people just don’t care anymore. It’s like most people just can’t be bothered taking things seriously. I really don’t understand it. We have drones swarming a military base and sure they send up some aircraft but this just keeps happening…it’s like leadership shrugs their shoulders and thinks we are invincible. Mind boggling.
@nsha2011
@nsha2011 2 ай бұрын
The drones could be being used to also test response times/reactions. This definitely is a threat.
@edwardking186
@edwardking186 2 ай бұрын
One of my favorite video games is Ace Combat 7 which came out in 2019, and one of the reasons why it's my favorite video game is because it was the perfect representation of what a future war would look like with AI drones. In the game, there is a war between two countries where one side at a traditional military with a traditional air force with manned fighter jets and another country that used mostly AI drone aircraft. The country with the AI drone aircraft pretty much took out most of the military of the other country on Day 1 of the conflict by sneaking them on containers on container ships at ports all over their country. The drone aircraft launched from the containers while they were still on the ships! Talk about swarming a country! That was the beginning of the game. The end of the game was even crazier! Two prototype and futuristic drone aircraft were AI copies of the enemy ace of the game, and they AI drones were going to copy themselves to every drone in the drone factories all over the world. The final mission was a race against time to shoot these drones down before they could transmit their data to the drone factories. It was an incredible game and an incredible story, and it was amazing to see the game come out when it did before these current world conflicts where we're drones being used more than ever as weapons in war. It was like the perfect preview of future wars.
@deanwilliams433
@deanwilliams433 2 ай бұрын
Yes, but the concepts the game showed have been done in other media for decades.
@nhansen197
@nhansen197 2 ай бұрын
I encountered a drone on a US military post. It turned out to be post personnel doing their hobby. At the time we had no procedures or directives regarding drones coming onto a military installation. I doubt anything has changed and security is not likely to have any way to deal with the drones.
@MarvinBoydCo
@MarvinBoydCo 2 ай бұрын
As an FPV pilot I can tell you that while you can fly while being mobile , in most cases you are sitting. The FPV drones though you won’t know who they are tired to since remote ID is not active YET. Even then if you are just streaming the feed and then recording it remotely it can be a 1 way drone as they are insanely inexpensive to build. Inexpensive would be about 200 dollars is about as cheap as I’ve made one.just thoughts from a nobody
@Thunderbyrd.
@Thunderbyrd. 2 ай бұрын
I'm also FPV guy. I fly both fly planes and drones. Remote ID is already online (my latest DJI drone came with it installed. Remote ID can be turned off using software or can be disconnected from power but there is a big fine if caught.
@drewd2
@drewd2 2 ай бұрын
Would it be possible that the military is sending these drone swarms at it's own bases as a readiness test to try to close security holes?
@A1FAHx
@A1FAHx 2 ай бұрын
Absolutely!
@beardedxdeath
@beardedxdeath 2 ай бұрын
I was thinking this too
@deadwingdomain
@deadwingdomain 2 ай бұрын
Well, they wouldnt tell us
@rk4921
@rk4921 2 ай бұрын
Absolutely not if it stops sorties ($$) or risks safety of flight.
@SixStringHarmonies
@SixStringHarmonies Ай бұрын
Not without preparing the base command. We don't perform blue on blue "surprise" events. SAFETY IS PARAMOUNT. Soldiers and sailors are people's mothers and fathers, sons and daughters.
@toddie4usa1
@toddie4usa1 2 ай бұрын
Are we about to witness Mover ruining drones?🤔
@tankdriver67m64
@tankdriver67m64 2 ай бұрын
Don’t know about Langley but the Navy was flying real aggressive at Oceana yesterday. It was a great show
@tunatuna8877
@tunatuna8877 2 ай бұрын
What were they doing? I live in vb and try to get out there when I have a chance to take pictures. anyway of knowing ahead of time?
@Hyposonic
@Hyposonic 2 ай бұрын
If college students can do 3D shows at football games using thousands of drones, why should we be surprised?
@1MileOut
@1MileOut 2 ай бұрын
Could this be a Red Cell for NSCT? Might explain all the NOTAMs you guys remember from a few years ago. What if all of the concerns Mover addressed are being tested to answer the very question Gonky asked, “How do you defend against that?”
@evanbenjamin4578
@evanbenjamin4578 2 ай бұрын
Agree with you Move about the "Concerns" .
@nimaiiikun
@nimaiiikun 2 ай бұрын
I hate how KZfaq moved the comments from the bottom of the video to the side bar. anyway to change it back?
@terrydepew1252
@terrydepew1252 2 ай бұрын
Try going full screen
@stab74
@stab74 2 ай бұрын
Mine is fine.
@rael5469
@rael5469 2 ай бұрын
Mine are ok. Unchanged.
@dougtaylor7724
@dougtaylor7724 2 ай бұрын
Phone is fine. Tablets are sidebar and clunky.
@neurofiedyamato8763
@neurofiedyamato8763 2 ай бұрын
Like the others, I don't have this. KZfaq tend to not roll out updates to everyone at the same time and they sometimes roll back. It is very inconsistent. Best to use google or reddit to find anyone with a similar issue
@mikejohnson4617
@mikejohnson4617 2 ай бұрын
I fear someday a weaponized drone swarm at a major outdoor public event.
@noahway13
@noahway13 2 ай бұрын
Or an inaugural address.
@lc3853
@lc3853 2 ай бұрын
I fear frightened morons acting in groups.
@Thunderbyrd.
@Thunderbyrd. 2 ай бұрын
There is anti-drone technology now, the US military has been using it for a couple of years, they also have a hand held unit that looks like a rifle of sorts that can be used by soldiers on the battle field.
@mikejohnson4617
@mikejohnson4617 2 ай бұрын
@@Thunderbyrd.Sure but how many can they handle at a time. I have seen drone displays with hundreds maybe thousands operated in unision. What if each carries a small explosive? What ever systems they have, they will be tested eventually.
@alaric_3015
@alaric_3015 2 ай бұрын
​@@mikejohnson4617the more swarming they would do the more vulnerable they are to jamming, they can't coordinate in the swarm during jamming, even if they are fully autonomous with automatic targeting, the sensor will still be jammed
@Mountain-Man-3000
@Mountain-Man-3000 2 ай бұрын
Forget a backpack. The bigger ones you can fly right out the back of a van or pickup with a cap on it. Land it and drive away. It's a massive problem.
@tehpw7574
@tehpw7574 2 ай бұрын
It's a little too late to close Pandora's Legs now (See: Gun Sales) since back in the day, when the FAA OK'd massive allowance of drone use in the commercial sector...
@neurofiedyamato8763
@neurofiedyamato8763 2 ай бұрын
@@tehpw7574 FAA allowing commercial use isn't going to prevent a foreign adversary from using it so that's a moot point. Even if you made it entirely illegal, it is extremely difficult to catch in time.
@tristantriton8115
@tristantriton8115 2 ай бұрын
The fact that we think this is crazy or dumb or conspiracy while we have an open border is really the crazy part.
@fredbyoutubing
@fredbyoutubing 2 ай бұрын
What does it have to do with the subject? Open border is a political buzz word. It's a manufactured issue for political gain.
@bongobrandy6297
@bongobrandy6297 2 ай бұрын
Yes, Michael Moore made a movie about the evil in the north. It was called ... "Canadian Bacon".
@JFelt
@JFelt 2 ай бұрын
Objection: relevance?
@navalofficer1
@navalofficer1 2 ай бұрын
@@fredbyoutubing idk maybe the chinese people walking through the open border unchecked with unregistered drones....?
@fredbyoutubing
@fredbyoutubing 2 ай бұрын
@@navalofficer1 Perhaps republicans should stop stalling bipartisan solutions. Although it would make them look bad if the government did something about it.
@SixStringHarmonies
@SixStringHarmonies Ай бұрын
Anyone in the USAS is well aware of the comprehensive anti-drone technology in possession of DoD. Particularly the Navy. So, these "drones" must be some very impressive technology indeed to thwart such advanced counter drone measures. Knowing what we know about the vastness of space, why are we all so afraid to acknowledge what is clearly happening?
@lost4468yt
@lost4468yt 2 ай бұрын
It's also a major threat for any navy. You can load up a bunch of cheap civilian boats with explosives and cheap drone tech and pretty much overwhelm anything currently in existence. Jamming isn't even useful there because you can use conventional algorithms to identify the targets pretty well - but advanced machine learning inference only chips are also getting very very cheap and mass produced, so you could easily make jamming irrelevant.
@deanwilliams433
@deanwilliams433 2 ай бұрын
Agreed, and let's be honest even the worst image trained system can detect something the size of a carrier verses a sailboat.
@allanrose3661
@allanrose3661 2 ай бұрын
I emailed NASA over a year ago and suggested they use their WB-57 aircraft and it's tracking cameras to try and record these UAP in the NAVY training area off the coast of Virginia.
@keithpennock
@keithpennock Ай бұрын
I’m with Mover on this & far from as sanguine as Gonky!
@cybersecuritydeclassified4793
@cybersecuritydeclassified4793 2 ай бұрын
It's not hard to detect a swarm. Do we know if these are fixed wing or rotary?
@mikemckee6583
@mikemckee6583 2 ай бұрын
It seems to me that the Achilles heel of a drone is its spinning props. Anything that would foul those props, especially if it caused some drones in a swarm to crash into each other and maybe even cause a cascade of drone midairs, might be effective in stopping a swarm attack. For protecting fixed targets, like airfields, I wonder if a pretty low-tech solution, like installing mortars around the perimeter that could fire large numbers of small projectiles on parachutes, might not be effective. It sounds a little crazy (and maybe it is), but if you could just put a high enough density of obstructions into the air at the right moment, maybe that could work. It obviously would only be possible at low altitude, but if the intent of a drone swarm is to carry explosives to cause damage, instead of just to surveil, it seems likely they’d have to stay pretty close to the ground to be accurate. Maybe it is a stupid idea, but trying to target them individually seems like a loser due to the potential numbers in a swarm, and even trying to jam the radio frequencies controlling them could be countered by frequency hopping or onboard autonomous navigation. That’s why I think you have to put something physical into the air to get in their way.
@TDQ_Gaming
@TDQ_Gaming 2 ай бұрын
Drone with a small shaped charge pointing down. In swarms, In our AFB's. That's a terrifying first strike scenario.
@TackshooterOG
@TackshooterOG 2 ай бұрын
Yep. I am at Langley now, it was an actual problem. There is research done at Langley that is for the NGAD at the nasa center attached to Langley.
@chrissinclair4442
@chrissinclair4442 2 ай бұрын
The ship thing, didn't it turn out to be almost any ship going in or out of San Diego?
@TimberStiffy_
@TimberStiffy_ 2 ай бұрын
@C.W Lemoine. Cwis with a high output laser and a jamming beam guns? . perimeter for low level, lightweight fish net wall popped up at least 20~25 ft from the ground ,activated at will, covering at least 40 line ft.and over lapping. might cost a few bucks but what's the alternative.
@XJapa1n09
@XJapa1n09 2 ай бұрын
I’m very curious about this because I’ve personally seen at other locations why these drone swarms shouldn’t be possible so it’s interesting that some locations don’t have a way to deal with this.
@paperburn
@paperburn 2 ай бұрын
Not saying this is it but, a long time ago from a point in California we would run mock attacks to test abilities of equipment . personel.
@jongarcia982
@jongarcia982 2 ай бұрын
I see people talking about Drone Tracking, which relies on RF signals. It wouldn't pick up drones designed to fly to an area and then detect aircraft shapes to target. Automated flight path like a Tomahawk missile, and program to detect and target aircraft shapes. Could fit a lot of drones in a trucking container, especially if each base has a couple trucks that launch at same time from different directions. Its a race to a drone air force.
@narwahlssb
@narwahlssb Ай бұрын
That wb57 is the Canberra bomber after it hit the MMA gym and got jacked. But decided to become a photographer.
@redfirekla
@redfirekla Ай бұрын
What scares me the most is when I watched a show on the B-2 it was stored in the above ground hanger made out of thin aluminum. Why wouldn't they store our most valuable aircraft the B-2 that has a load capacity of a B-1 Lancer in some underground hanger type that goes in some underground heavily fortified hanger....
@craigsanders6925
@craigsanders6925 2 ай бұрын
Wasn't this on last week?
@joebenedetti5515
@joebenedetti5515 2 ай бұрын
When I think of this logically the more I believe its either us testing our own readiness or a bored teenager. The last thing I would want to do if I was a foreign power with drone sleepers, assuming they exist, is find a hole in our air defense just to have it modified or shut when its go time. Not to mention potential of reaction to something like that. The other piece the Air Force said it was referred to FBI so that again leans towards a random person being dumb.
@bradboyer5288
@bradboyer5288 2 ай бұрын
completely agree with this. Dangerous. Not only do we have technology to detect and track drones, the military also has ways to jam them and they fall out of the sky. Why haven't the military moved this weapon system into Langley? Its DUH thing for me. And definitely moved the f22s somewhere else for a while.
@Miggs757
@Miggs757 2 ай бұрын
With the thousands of military age men from China, and other adversarial actors, coming across the southern (majority) and northern border, I am convinced these drones are precursory intelligence gathering and testing counter-drone capabilities at critical nodes like Langley and NOB Norfolk. The Ukrainian war has shown that defense against drone swarms is difficult, if not impossible.
@kenlanier2131
@kenlanier2131 2 ай бұрын
Unless these drones were totally autonomous, they would be emitting TX/RX signals that could be tracked/monitored SIGINTEL?? Maybe even jammed?
@Thunderbyrd.
@Thunderbyrd. 2 ай бұрын
Exactly, as a owner of several drones foe a few years I agree. Anti-Drone tech can take control of them or jam the signal causing it to crash. This has been around for 8 or more years in several configs. My guess is they are not consumer or commercial drones. My opinion is they are either a foreign adversary with tech we don't have or can match, or, wait for it, ........ Non-Human Intelligence (NHI).
@venkuzephyr
@venkuzephyr 2 ай бұрын
It’s funny people are talking about this because there were several drone NOTAMS posted around the same days this was happening.
@user-vg7mu6yn5o
@user-vg7mu6yn5o 2 ай бұрын
Time to develop an anti-drone system based on the naval CWIS system. They developed that system 40 years ago, don't tell me we could not make one small enough to fit on a vehicle with auto-guns aimed by radar, infrared, or shotgun microphones.
@cmdrefstathiusplacidus9003
@cmdrefstathiusplacidus9003 2 ай бұрын
I hope they confirm these Pilots have remote ID otherwise the FAA may have to track them down and give them a ticket
@cmdrefstathiusplacidus9003
@cmdrefstathiusplacidus9003 2 ай бұрын
LMAO
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
@jerseyshoredroneservices225 2 ай бұрын
That was my first thought and my first comment. Lamoine asked if this could happen and I was like not anymore, not since 16 March because we have remote ID now 😂😂😂
@williamhall2386
@williamhall2386 2 ай бұрын
WB57 just left Ellington the other day over my house. I think they live here?
@Turboy65
@Turboy65 2 ай бұрын
People with talent, creativity, and some engineering skill and a developmental budget to play with have enormous opportunities to do something useful in the counterdrone field. It's only a matter of time before all military installations and all airfields, military, commercial, or civilian, will be guarded by effective counterdrone measures. And they will evolve quickly as the threat will too.
@danielnelson-2121
@danielnelson-2121 2 ай бұрын
I hear Mossberg makes an outstanding 12 Guage anti drone device that's relatively inexpensive and is easy to train personnel on how to operate it within the span of a few hours
@mattfleming86
@mattfleming86 2 ай бұрын
Which only really does anything for low flying drones. So good at taking out a FPV in it's terminal phase but not so much anything above about 300 feet.
@samwilliams1142
@samwilliams1142 2 ай бұрын
Some FPV drones carry shaped charges. First comes surveillance then comes strike. An A.I. drone could be programmed to attack with photographs from reconnaissance drone.
@bobbobberts
@bobbobberts 2 ай бұрын
12 gage shotguns with birdshot?
@neurofiedyamato8763
@neurofiedyamato8763 2 ай бұрын
I considered this too, but drones can surveil an area far beyond the range of any shotgun. An AR with a fire-control optic like what the US (Vortex XM157 NGSW-FC) or UK (SMASH X4) is fielding would be more viable due to their extended engagement ranges.
@jmartin4667
@jmartin4667 Ай бұрын
​@@neurofiedyamato8763😂 stop telling people to shoot in the air
@FastHatTrick
@FastHatTrick 2 ай бұрын
Also, the USAF has been discussing potential solutions to include radar based Phalanx type systems for drone defense.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
@jerseyshoredroneservices225 2 ай бұрын
It's hard to imagine a situation where the government would turn on C-Ram with most bases Surrounded by neighborhoods.
@user-ft2zc5or9d
@user-ft2zc5or9d 2 ай бұрын
​@@jerseyshoredroneservices225i agree. Avenger SAMs would be better.. they've been set up in DC before
@Dennis-vh8tz
@Dennis-vh8tz 2 ай бұрын
@@jerseyshoredroneservices225It's hard to imagine a situation where the government would be stupid enough to allow neighbourhoods to surround bases.
@bks252
@bks252 2 ай бұрын
Can’t they figure out how to jam the frequencies they’re using or are they maybe using frequencies hoping if they’re military grade?
@falconeaterf15
@falconeaterf15 2 ай бұрын
I fly old school RC airplanes with wings and stuff. All 2.4ghz radios, for the last 20 years or so, use frequency hopping technology so RC pilots can fly around each other without worrying about who’s on what frequency. Transmitter is synchronized with receiver and changes frequency like a hundred times a second. Dirt cheap and works very well. Dudes fly $10,000 jets with them so they must be reliable.
@dannysnyder6791
@dannysnyder6791 2 ай бұрын
AI and/or preprogrammed with GPS or even just known starting point and tracking distance traveled through non-GPS means and you don't need RF control....
@pistonburner6448
@pistonburner6448 2 ай бұрын
@@dannysnyder6791Yes, they don't necessarily need any radio if properly equipped and tasked.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
@jerseyshoredroneservices225 2 ай бұрын
The problem with RF jamming at AUS base is that it doesn't just jam the intended target it jams everything so people in the surrounding neighborhoods would lose everything that they're using GPS for. A sophisticated attacker would likely use means to get around GPS jamming. Jamming would probably only affect the people who aren't doing anything seriously wrong.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
@jerseyshoredroneservices225 2 ай бұрын
​@@falconeaterf15 Remember the early days of RC planes and cars? We all had to be very careful about who was using which frequency and that people didn't inadvertently turn on their transmitters when not flying or driving.
@datrem4197
@datrem4197 2 ай бұрын
Multiple drones can image with very detail imagery. For over five years there has been software that allows a DJI drone to make a programmed pattern over a position in order to develop a 3D image of the location. Multiple drones would make this capability easier and faster, not to mention the area it could map.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
@jerseyshoredroneservices225 2 ай бұрын
Waypoint missions with X amount of overlap is not a DJI thing. There are countless companies and individuals who can do that. Same with processing the imagery into maps and models, it's not a DJI thing. Its actually very common in the building, construction and surveying industries. Film and TV production and event planning also use the technology.
@nerdindaherd5907
@nerdindaherd5907 Ай бұрын
After this video was posted, several Chinese military aged males were apprehended by military police for trespassing on military bases. These individuals were taking photos of vehicles and facilities.
@JTLaser1
@JTLaser1 2 ай бұрын
Surely there’s no danger to our massive fleet of F-22s!
@windmolenfarm8030
@windmolenfarm8030 2 ай бұрын
The WB57 can be and probably is configured for ELINT or electronic intelligence gathering from high altitude. They were probably trying to intercept the controlling telemetry of the user to pick up the frequencies and often imbedded code serial numbers that can lead back to where purchased and by whom. They can also track the drones back to the point of departure with this info and try to catch them and identify the "bad guys". Just saying.
@MrGriff305
@MrGriff305 2 ай бұрын
Better get the laser defense systems up and running
@flyingfortress4819
@flyingfortress4819 2 ай бұрын
I won’t say which AFB I’m at, but we also experienced a drone swarm a few weeks ago
@unfurling3129
@unfurling3129 2 ай бұрын
What was the response?
@cup_and_cone
@cup_and_cone 2 ай бұрын
@@unfurling3129 Probably a bunch of people walking to flight line, looking up, and going "yup".
@gunraptor
@gunraptor 2 ай бұрын
It could just be a NASA nerd from NASA Langley Research Center (co-located with Langley AFB) testing out his own stuff literally for work right next door.
@JPF123
@JPF123 2 ай бұрын
*Incredulously* : "I'm superficial, it's ugly- come on!" lol On a serious note- why don't US federal installations simply have the ability to jam civllian-grade small drones? They work via a radio signal transmitted 4 or less miles. Jam the shit out of the drone's radio frequency and follow it to it's origin point. If it's like a Uke drone it'll fall to the ground.
@GraemeHein
@GraemeHein 2 ай бұрын
There's a huge amount of installations that would need fine-grained radar, jamming equipment/kinetic, and people to operate. Massive CAPEX and substantial OPEX. High power microwave projects like USAF THOR are still research efforts not even IOC. Getting effective ROE for CONUS would be another challenge
@davidgermain
@davidgermain 2 ай бұрын
people are massively under appreciating the impact on asymmetric warfare and the Ukraine thing. the general public have know idea how dangerous things are. Any mass gathering now has the issue of not single person with a backpack bomber's but untraceable drone swarms.
@offshorebear
@offshorebear 2 ай бұрын
The Navy has its unmanned vehicle Center of Excellence literally next door to Langley AFB.
@AvenEngineer
@AvenEngineer 2 ай бұрын
Wouldn't virtually any nation state of concern have high enough resolution from space?
@GauntletKI
@GauntletKI 2 ай бұрын
Reminds me of the south park episode about drones
@DrDirigible
@DrDirigible Ай бұрын
Drones and radio controlled models are now required to have "Remote ID" transmitters onboard. I'm sure the bad guys will comply with this rule while the rest of us have to foot the cost or stop flying.
@harescrambled
@harescrambled 2 ай бұрын
I think it's the Canadians trying to figure out how we're still flying 70 year old T-38s
@noahway13
@noahway13 2 ай бұрын
What is the cost ratio if they take out a squadron of F-22's with a bunch of $2,000 drones?
@bernarrcoletta7419
@bernarrcoletta7419 2 ай бұрын
If you want to think about something that will really make your blood run cold, think about those decorative drone displays that a lot of places are using instead of fireworks. Now imagine each of them with a five-pound munition....
@4edward61
@4edward61 2 ай бұрын
This is a true and quite concerning event. If we're just now talking about or seeing this, how long has this been going on?!? And what are the deep ramifications of this? Scary as all get out!
@BeechSportBill
@BeechSportBill 2 ай бұрын
Did you see that drone demo of the running horses in Saudi?
@dertythegrower
@dertythegrower 2 ай бұрын
They have bigger dual-human carrying drone swarms. It is already buyable, it has stocks on wallstreet, and FAA and our side is far behind with Archer... 😐🤦‍♂️🇺🇲 iykyk. Also its on video already, i have told people since 2021.. few people even notice. They even have a youtuber page
@dertythegrower
@dertythegrower 2 ай бұрын
approved in asia, japan, and now costa rica.. nobody pays attention 🤦‍♂️😐
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
@jerseyshoredroneservices225 2 ай бұрын
A major point of drones as weapons is that you don't need humans a boy. Once you put a human on an aircraft you're right back to what you could have done with a Cessna or even a paraglider all along.
@AmericanAbsolute
@AmericanAbsolute 2 ай бұрын
The infiltration of drones into Langley Air Force Base is deeply concerning, especially with the strong possibility that they may be originating from within the country, possibly linked to properties purchased by China near military bases. This raises significant security issues and underscores the need for thorough investigation and monitoring. The veracity of this claim can be verified through public records, highlighting the importance of addressing potential threats posed by these drones launched from nearby properties.
@trevorn9381
@trevorn9381 2 ай бұрын
I live on 11 acres very near Langley Air Force Base and the other day I got something in the mail from some real estate investment company based in Florida that was interested in acquiring my property. The POC that I was asked to contact if I was interested in selling was some guy with a Chinese name. I tossed it in the trash, maybe I shouldn't have.
@stopspammandm
@stopspammandm 2 ай бұрын
Langley is right on the water so they don’t need to buy property near it. They can just just launch them off boats sitting offshore.
@trevorn9381
@trevorn9381 2 ай бұрын
@@stopspammandm They have to dock their boats somewhere and and my property is right on the water and has a pier. It is also large enough that there are no close neighbors.
@lasselahti4056
@lasselahti4056 2 ай бұрын
Maybe it's just The Arnold taking over. "First The Arnold then the machineeees!"
@Ridingon3TN
@Ridingon3TN 2 ай бұрын
still another issue being overlooked just like in other bad things..The question that should be talked about is "who" more than "what or where" their tool of choice is from or made by.
@pootmahgoots8482
@pootmahgoots8482 2 ай бұрын
"Unidentified flying...thingies?" Yeah those UFTs man. I agree with Mover though. This could be a probing mission to see what they can get away with and after the balloon that flew over the entire US, I feel like the Chinese are like, "Let's do some more, really figure out their limits." And with the election coming up in November I get the feeling that this won't be the only time we see these kinds of things go on. Also, the act that I haven't seen nearly as much coverage on this on the news like I did with the balloon, tells me this is something different.
@Evocati-Augusti
@Evocati-Augusti 2 ай бұрын
The Vehicle Agnostic Modular Palletized ISR Rocket Equipment (VAMPIRE) & and the USAF Research Laboratorys THOR weapon are 2 good choices .
@Freezefpdx
@Freezefpdx 2 ай бұрын
I live in Virginia and I had no idea this happened… I wonder what the drones are doing
@SynchronizorVideos
@SynchronizorVideos 2 ай бұрын
Something I'm wondering is: if the USAF does have decent anti-drone weapons and countermeasures (which I'm sure they're working on), would they actually use them on low-volume flyovers like this? Seems like whipping out a whiz-bang laser system or whatever for every little airspace violation would just show off their capabilities (or lack thereof) and help potential attackers figure out how to bypass them. Especially if whatever anti-drone system is early on in development and not ready for the worst-case of hundreds or thousands of drones at once. Not saying this is 100% what's going on, but it could be an explanation for why the response so far seems to be purely observational. We do know just from public information that military and civilian R&D groups have been working on soft- and hard-kill anti-drone systems for at least the last several years.
@Rob-vv5yn
@Rob-vv5yn 2 ай бұрын
The little drones have a limited range you should be able to locate the user as its user will be within 10-20kms
@Thunderbyrd.
@Thunderbyrd. 2 ай бұрын
My most recently purchased DJI drone has a flight time of 35 minutes and a range of 7+ miles.
@Ubernator
@Ubernator 2 ай бұрын
His last name is Guillot, gee-yacht It is French and common in south Louisiana. Mover should know that 😜
@stanhry
@stanhry 2 ай бұрын
Could it be only American citizens just wanting to get pictures of a airbase? When I at an air base to see the museum and decommissioned Nuke silos. I took photo of B1 taking off with a long wildlife lens. The odds it is just warplanes fans or pesky neighbors.
@dannysnyder6791
@dannysnyder6791 2 ай бұрын
I hope you're being facetious.... If a curious American thought of it, you can pretty much guarantee a bad actor has already thought about how to take it to a whole other level....
@wyldhowl2821
@wyldhowl2821 2 ай бұрын
Well, yeah, there are also plenty of anti-government militia types out there. Do they have the technical capability to make drones that do this, or worse? Yes. If you can make a truck bomb or 3d print a ghost gun, how hard is this by comparison? It's tech you can buy in a shopping mall. As for the motivations, could be literally anything from the conspiracy theory grab-bag - maybe they think they can use drones to catch people at Langley AFB having satanic pizza orgies. I put those odds ahead of "some teenage jackass thought filming a military base would be cool".
@stupidburp
@stupidburp 2 ай бұрын
Seems like someone is trying to prove a point and get the DoD to react with reforms to mitigate against the potential threats of drones.
@robert5
@robert5 2 ай бұрын
EMP plus radio jamming should work to drop a drone from the sky. Drone are not autonomous they are remote control. Sever that communication connection and the drone stops.
@ocker2000
@ocker2000 2 ай бұрын
Sending drones to this sensitive AFB on the US East Coast being seen but not being caught is an act of war. Apparently these drones dared to hang around long enough for calling in that WB-57 Canberra to take a closer look, thats many hours of lead time. WTF. So if China or Russia is controlling these at Langley AFB and were also around those Navy ships 100 miles off LA coast in US territorial waters its war. Then there were the "drones" in Colorado seen by law enforcement, etc. If these drones are not Chinese or Russian, and its not a US secret program, it would fall in the category "other" or UAP. This is just as serious. I would say even more disturbing.
@Michael-Gill
@Michael-Gill 2 ай бұрын
The things I read that made me say "da'fuq?" are... ...it was about 40 drones of various sizes flying for extended periods of time, over the course of hours. They approached from the Atlantic from beyond the horizon. They arrived in groups and waves, some groups loitered for extended periods, then they trickled back towards the ocean, over the horizon in the direction they came. Oh, and no one reported them making any noise. What kind of adversary drone can do that?
@neurofiedyamato8763
@neurofiedyamato8763 2 ай бұрын
small drones aren't that loud especially when they are relatively far away. Like after a block or two, you won't hear small commercial quadcopter drones. Additionally, it's not that hard for some small narco-esque submarine or speed boat to be a launch platform. And drones can seaskim 1 meter above the surface of the water and so "over the horizon" is not actually that far out. There are plenty of ways to do this and if a foreign adversary really wants to surveil the area; it is easily doable.
@nexthubbins
@nexthubbins 2 ай бұрын
New propellers are very quiet.
@cybervigilante
@cybervigilante 2 ай бұрын
Small drones can't fly for hours. Something is off.
@Michael_the_muffinman
@Michael_the_muffinman 2 ай бұрын
I live in Norfolk. Almost all the time the aircraft are flying. Lots of them helicopters. Can’t a military helicopter track drone to its landing and call local PD?
@JRichardsonBoston
@JRichardsonBoston 2 ай бұрын
DARPA project?
@Gunni1972
@Gunni1972 2 ай бұрын
I know, launching a surveillance plane is not done quick, but WEEKS? I doubt, these drones were hostile anyway. But an EW-plane should have noticed pretty precise, where the signals came from.
@NE-Explorer
@NE-Explorer Ай бұрын
Wow its not like unknown groups are shooting up power sub stations. Couldnt possibly be another group. All of these activities are messages from an adversary.
@simonmoorcroft1417
@simonmoorcroft1417 2 ай бұрын
Is it too controversial for them to interview Ryan Graves?? He was a naval aviator, has first hand knowledge of UAP events in restricted air space and runs an organisation dedicated to aviation safety. I can't believe they have not interviewed him already just out of sheer curiosity if nothing else.
@xwhogafx815
@xwhogafx815 2 ай бұрын
Are you guys still eligible to be recalled to active duty?
@kennethhicks2113
@kennethhicks2113 2 ай бұрын
I'm with Wombat on this one. Mover, you've highlighted the problem with many of our processes/things... so much administrative/bureaucratic BS in anything we do puts Monty Python to shame...
The Terrifying Technology Inside Drone Cameras
18:36
New Mind
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
SpaceX Finally CLEARS Starship For Flight 4!
20:01
What about it!?
Рет қаралды 194 М.
¡Puaj! No comas piruleta sucia, usa un gadget 😱 #herramienta
00:30
JOON Spanish
Рет қаралды 22 МЛН
1❤️
00:20
すしらーめん《りく》
Рет қаралды 32 МЛН
ONE MORE SUBSCRIBER FOR 6 MILLION!
00:38
Horror Skunx
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Which is Better? Flying the F-16 or the F/A-18?
30:19
C.W. Lemoine
Рет қаралды 318 М.
Testing the US Military’s Worst Idea
24:39
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Air Force Announces Aircraft Retirements in Fiscal Year 2025
11:26
C.W. Lemoine
Рет қаралды 26 М.
Flying Fast Jets Is a Dangerous Business (In Memoriam)
12:31
C.W. Lemoine
Рет қаралды 40 М.
Horror Short Film “Slaughterbots” | ALTER
8:03
ALTER
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
F-35 Completes Key Combat Simulations - Rick Abell Explains
11:12
C.W. Lemoine
Рет қаралды 17 М.
How this Ship changes America's future Wars in the Pacific
13:31
F-15EX Goes Mach 3! (Or Does it?
6:49
C.W. Lemoine
Рет қаралды 25 М.
Langley Aeronautics Research Directorate Highlights
4:21
NASA Langley Research Center
Рет қаралды 8 М.
This Air Force Base Was Easily My Favorite!
5:45
JodywithaWhy
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Как я сделал домашний кинотеатр
0:41
RICARDO
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
5 НЕЛЕГАЛЬНЫХ гаджетов, за которые вас посадят
0:59
Кибер Андерсон
Рет қаралды 472 М.