no double indications of movement - simple and consistent - therefore, qualitatively
@paulovalerioalves46803 жыл бұрын
Very nice helicopter
@1784robin5 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know what aerofoil is used on the main rotor blades ?
@dickvdboogaard94804 жыл бұрын
Extruded alu
@dhiakhamis6433 жыл бұрын
Looks sweet and ez is ? 😀
@mrceleb20067 жыл бұрын
Rotax engine in that one!
@jdix00097 жыл бұрын
Yes. Rotax 914
@mrceleb20067 жыл бұрын
OK, I see.
@manofsan3 жыл бұрын
Why seal the door from the outside? What if there's nobody on the outside to unseal you when you want to get out?
@LanPiloto3 жыл бұрын
Well just open it from the inside
@mr.astronomy8073 жыл бұрын
How much? Is this factory built?
@paulmurray87342 ай бұрын
Anyone noticed the guy smoking the cigarette?
@alexabadi74583 жыл бұрын
May I take my purse with me ? I'm sorry but we may be over loaded.
@fredyalexanderbarretoporra79623 жыл бұрын
Precio de una unidad de elicoptero y la empresa que lo vende como se llama y en donde lo venden país que lo produce o país de origen
@Agislife19603 жыл бұрын
I didn't think that Rotax engine was ever gonna stop winding up, those things sure turn a lot of RPM to be aircraft engines.
@chippyjohn15 ай бұрын
Higher RPM is better. Low revving engines are obsolete. If you think 5500rpm is fast, what about turbines that spin at 30-50000rpm?
@Agislife19605 ай бұрын
@@chippyjohn1 Turbine engines aren't converting the up and down motion of pistons into the rotational motion of a crankshaft
@chippyjohn15 ай бұрын
@@Agislife1960 Look, an IO360's pistons are under about 2.5 times the stress of a Rotax 914 because of their mass. The pistons in both engines travel about the same speed, but because of the mass of the big merican engine, they are under far more stress. One of the many reasons big old engines arent used anymore. A lesson in physics incase you don;t believe me. Raise a golf ball above your head and drop it, then raise a bowling ball and drop it. Let me know which one hurts more.
@Agislife19605 ай бұрын
@@chippyjohn1 Your last comment mentioned Turbine engines which isn't a good analogy when referring to the problems that must be overcome by piston engine designs and because the laws of physics don't change large low revving engines will never be obsolete, a Lycoming 580 engine will never reliable run at 5000 RPM
@chippyjohn15 ай бұрын
@@Agislife1960 FACE PALM. It's not about RPM, its about piston speed and reciprocating mass. An IO580 has a piston that weighs about 2500grams while a rotax 914 piston weighs about 500g. Both are traveling at the same speed, so the IO580 is under far more stress. You americans keep imagining large engines revving high. Smaller engines are able to rev higher safely. A little RC nitro engine can rev comfortably at 30-40000 rpm because of its short stroke and low piston mass. Its basic maths. Did you try the golf ball/bowling ball test? Large piston engines such as lycoming and continental are obsolete because they weigh far more for the same amount of power as a smaller engine.