Sadomasochist 100

me :)

power move

same

lmfao....that is really weird and hilarious

It's really not that crazy. There are many awesome people in the world that can teach each of us many things!

Agree

You mean he’s crazily amazing?

What? How? Literally nothing in common

@@alebubble4586 intelligent is CPU/GPU - EGO is Motherboard/body - Emotions is Ram/memory He's human Tech support. He has tutorials on the mind, and body

@@alebubble4586 r/wooosh

with no shitty accent

This is hilariously accurcate

hurr durr

cringe

@@TheNuub63 and it's not even your profile picture

Hmm ok I won't refuse, thanks

Wow, that sucks. Please tell me more.

Brings an interesting dimension to Riven being "Taken"

maybe the real raid boss is the friends we made along the way

🤣

Did you succeed in having sex with a female of the species. I'm asking because I'm a soon 30 incel.

@@ezrabay4393 well first tip would be they don't like being called females of the species haha

@@ezrabay4393 Are you for real

@@seaks368 Why not? He wants sex. Nothing wrong with that.

@@ollybobba8692 probably said that cause he referred to women as "females of the species"

Same, where can we find the unedited versions?

They are on Twitch: www.twitch.tv/videos/584798563 but gonna be deleted eventually; I'd wish they were uploaded here too.

No. Freud only popularised some earlier authors and added a lot of fraudulent nonsense. Just like Jung. Both were charismatic fantasists.

The lecture was good but the questions on this one was invaluable.

@@ExpexTex invaluable for whome? For you? great! Not for me and many others

@@Xtazieyo he is agreeing with you. Invaluable means extremely valuable. English is weird like that.

@@123andrewli7 Fuck, my bad! Sorry :D

To clarify, I meant the questions were the best part :)

I have a theory hear me out. Actually our thoughts in our headspace are like an environment for the ego. When the ego learns that thoughts or emotions are a threat it reacts with a fight/flight/freeze response to them. From the outside it seems silly because your thoughts are in your mind no matter what, but maybe you could learn from the outside somehow that specific emotions can be dangerous to you. So an act of healing would be learning that your thoughts and emotions are no threat to you, just information and a part of life or sth. I don't know. Also that would combine eastern and western approaches (Behaviorism not Freud). But that's just a theory

​@@emiknapheide1817 "... learning that your thoughts and emotions are no threat to you" I think this is inaccurate. Emotions and thoughts can be a severe threat to You. This is why we need discipline of the mind after all. Most of the harm we suffer is due to thoughts we had, or the lack of thoughts we had. I could be wrong, but I think most of the problems come from within. For example if we fail to correctly asses a situation, or we fail to grasp the idea or the context of the situation. This will lead to probably correct thoughts, but in a wrong enviroment. The reason this is so dangerous is because the thought proccess will be logical and correct and absolutely stupid and detrimental in reality, due to mismatch of the core idea.

He didn't talk about the citta at all. That's crucial to solve it permanently. But it's a long and difficult journey. If you can't do it, you need to work on the meditative mindset so that you can observe when your intellect (buddhi) starts working to defend your ego (ahankara). I know that Sadhguru did go into talking about the citta as well when he talked about this. You could check that out if you want to although it's not enough to understand all this completely

chiming in because id also like to know.

I didn't realise that but now it bugs me too. Thanks.

The notion that the west should be on the left only comes from the standard now in cartography that north is "up". There is a lot of old maps where south is up, and east would be left.

@@stefanlish I prefer the south up map. The north end of a compass needle points to the "north pole" which is the magnetic south pole.

Contact his mods on discord, that's probably the fastest way to get information

Lower your brightness, it causes less strain on the eye to use black on white

PuiuDR i was just thinking this

If you're still interested: I don't have a perfect answer but what's been helping me is exploring yourself, figuring out what makes you tick (Doshas/MBTI were both good compasses to help me orient myself) and begin to build your life around that. I've taken from Dr. K's videos on Dosha's that Vata's do great when they live their life like an MMO, so I started to do that (it's been close to a month) and my motivation (in the more primal sense of the word, motive, my motive for living and wanting to do stuff), happiness, mindset, and more has been changing rapidly. In one phrase I'd say the friction in my life is lessening. I'm coming up against multiple life challenges/transition points and I feel more prepared than I have for any previous challenges. When you live your life closer in accordance with who you are/who you discover yourself to be, flow becomes easier to attain. You may also begin to function at a higher baseline and cognitive efficiency which borderlines on flow. Figure out what works for you, and use whatever tools are at your disposal to make figuring yourself out easier.

I believe it's just implied we as a western audience have been taught the western way of thinking anyway. All about Freud's kinky behaviors, all about the Id, Ego, and Superego. Conscious and Unconscious. I feel It'd drag on and on if he were to keep talking about the western approach. There's probably a billion videos you could watch for the western approach, but the eastern is totally new to western listeners.

Being western, You have google to reward you with an abundance of western thought. Why are you complaining

I think he covers that in his motivation videos. His general answer is that you need to change how you approach exercise and how it affects your purpose and whatnot. But the answer should be on his youtube channel

@@123andrewli7 thanks, yeah i have watched those and tried to apply them to exercise, i suppose one of the issues is that there really isn't any great sense of meaning behind it except, i just do it because i want to stay slim

@@bytesizedrant I'm glad you found something that helps, that's a good suggestion too, only thing is my options are limited to my local area atm due to lockdown

@@adamscaife6931 yeah, ive honestly been getting the feeling that if you want to do something really difficult that you don't want to do and you don't have a meaning, then you're pretty much screwed. That is unless you use extreme willpower and burn out, or someone or something literally forces you to do it. What helped me with art was breaking stuff up into manageable chunks and focusing on no expectations, but I'm sure you've already done that.

@@123andrewli7 I'm trying i guess haha

Understanding why others are treating you bad and coming with reasons with why it's your fault are two completely different things. Dr K. admits he has an ego that he also needs to fight sometimes but when we're aware of it as it happens allows more control of whether or not we let it influence our actions. I could be wrong but "healthy ego" is probably just low enough ego to not let it be the lead control of our actions.

@@themightylubu I would probably say that a healthy ego is having healthy boundaries and a strong sense of Self (this is me, that is you) in any situation and that can be tricky for me as I don't have enough ego to make that discernment, most likely because of narcissistic (damaged egos) caregivers and abuse in childhood which made me develope high empathic abilities and not enough ego (boundaries). So now I kinda automatically take responsibility for others negative ("bad") actions and feelings. My intellect comes up with reasons how I can please my abusers as a defence mechanism (since this wound is from childhood where I was dependent on my abusers). So in a way I guess an unhealthy ego is either underdeveloped or overdeveloped which both leads to the intellect coming up with reasons (coping/defence strategies) why you are worse (bad) or better (greater) than others. A healthy ego doesn't compare its Self with other Selves, it's "good enough"... And I don't believe Dr. K needs to fight his ego, only be aware of it as it arises and that's enough. Fighting it only makes it stronger (more unhealthy).

@@Bibbzter666 Ah I think it makes sense that people with abusive parents to have adapted/learned strategies and habits to cope as well as empathy towards others with similar situations. I don't believe that taking the blame for things that aren't necessarily your fault are because of abusive parents because it's actually a common logical thing that many people do even without parental abuse. If my memory serves me well, I recall Dr. K mentioning in another ego video that ego is generally comparative so it sounds incoherent with the idea that a "healthy ego doesn't compare its self with other selves." In another video he also mentioned that ego is like a counterbalance with confidence, so when one is high ego they would have low confidence and vise versa. I'm not really on board with the idea of a "healthy" ego, I feel it makes more sense that a person with high confidence naturally doesn't feel any hunger of a sense self worth from others.

@@themightylubu If you don't like the idea of a healthy ego maybe you could think of it as a gradient scale where both poles are unhealthy and the middle is healthy, much like a scale where normal is in the center and the further out towards the edges you go the more abnormal you become. And if we take the same scale and put confident in the middle we can put ego on both ends of the spectrum. One extreme is weak ego with pourous boundaries and the other extreme is a massive ego with impenetrable boundaries. Both polar extreme are unhealthy in different ways and often tend to attract the opposite in relationships that turns out toxic. Another way to look at it would be that a healthy ego is an ego that engages when faced with a truly dangerous situation where you actually need to push back in self-defense. A weak ego will allow people to walk all over you while a big ego will abuse people around you because you feel entitled to do so. Ego in and of itself is neither good or bad. If you have no ego you're completely defenseless to abuse and exploitation. Ego is protection. A "big" ego is an ego that believes it's "I better abuse you before you have the chance to abuse me".

@@themightylubu To the first point about taking the blame for things that aren't your fault: You don't have to have had abusive parents to FEEL that you are to blame for others abuse but you need to FEEL LESS (worthless) than them. And if that is your internal logic (which is probably illogical once you externalize it) you must have constructed that logic while forming your identity and it would be a built in trapdoor of your ego. You would allow enemies into your personal space because you do not deserve protection for some fucked up internal logical reason...

Apple notes

Check Osho comments about the mind. On youtube or in google.

AYE!

I think there's a difference between "no one can know what is best for other people" and "no one should make any central authority whatsoever" Anarchy vs Libertarianism.

Chris Hekman I think the idea is, individuals are the ones who should decide what they want to do. And authority should be voluntary, like school or churches.

Mike From my understanding, Anarchy is the conclusion when you push libertariarinisam to its extrem.

@@transon6655 School isn't voluntary, society has also been shaped to make sure schooling is prohibitive to quite alot.

I remembered. My theory is the mind stuff thing is an in the moment observation. That’s why I had a query.

I don’t believe calling yourself lazy is intellectually lazy. I believe it’s a subconscious thing. You’re forcing your consciousness to the better part of consciousness which is the subconscious. That’s muscle memory. That’s remembering how to do something instead of re reading the instructions. It’s really tackling it head on. I guess you could take this and say well, procrastinators, problem solvers, roundabout solutions, but what rules that out. Who’s to say someone who tackles situations head on doesn’t have a roundabout solution.

Well usually when people use the word "ego" they actually mean "inflated ego". But I think you're looking at ego in the more literal sense, as in ego is one's sense of self. So if you look at it that way, I think it might make sense that some negative thoughts towards ourselves are ego thoughts, like our ego attacking itself lol. But I'm not through the whole video yet so I could be way off

The moment comparisons are happening ego is at play, and it is a tough love kind of protective because it puts you down so no one else can do worse.

Yoga with adrienne

How is the soul your ego? If you define ego as self worth from the outside, as Dr. K did in this video, it doesn't make much sense to consider that your soul

@@bantzbeats9643 Souls sin all the time. They can develop an ego. I don't see your point. A soul is more than just ego. The soul can still represent the part of ego in these models. Don't worry too much about. It was just my two cents.

I can empathize with your use of scripture, however, I'd like to correct a small nick in your understanding. "Heart" to the Hebrew is the same as western "thoughts." You do not think in your head in Hebrew. You think in the heart. This is reflected in the use of language all throughout the Old Testament. So when the scripture says "the heart is deceitful and wicked" it's referring to our thoughts and "mind" in the western sense. Emotions are the lower organs in Hebrew. Kidneys, for example, are the organs used for desire and longing. It sounds foreign to us, but we also use body comparatives in English for things like courage (he has guts!) or insight (I feel it in my gut/bones). These are linguistic euphemisms to reflect a metaphysical reality we all accept. However, through the ages, preserving the common knowledge of how Hebrew and Greek use these phrases and how English uses these phrases hasn't been done that well. A westernized version of Deuteronomy 6:5, using comparable euphemisms, would be: "Love Yahweh your God with all your understanding (read: intellect/reason), with all your soul (read: being, life, existence), and all your everything." The Hebrew word for "your might" or in your translation "your mind" is a possessive adverb that translates to "your exceedingly." This obviously doesn't render grammatically in English. It means to the utmost, to an excessive degree. "Your everything" is the intent though. The point is, all of yourself, to the utmost end, should love Yahweh, the God of Israel. tl;dr, your (western) heart is in the right place in wanting to elevate scripture to the highest regard, however, your (Hebrew) heart (aka, your thoughts/understanding) misunderstood what the original language was saying. It isn't so much a breakdown of the parts of our soul/consciousness. It's simply a few examples of things we consider "us," followed by our entire persons/beings.

RandomName damn thanks for the session doc, where can i pay you?

@@lukaLondaridze Was this comment your emotion, ego or intellect? :D

BantzBeats ur the professional here you tell me

The difference lies within the reasons why we do things. If the reasoning comes down to what you believe you are, that's ego. If it's not based in that, then that's more confident. There are plenty of good reasons to ignore someone. But it may be valuable to listen to someone. Just because it's egotistical, doesn't mean there isn't any truth. That's why you'd might listen. Go back to when he describes how an overactive ego corrupts ones thought process. He describes the information the intellect grabs as biased, but biased doesn't necessarily wrong. So you can't know unless you've fully considered their position regardless of how egotistical they are. Did that make sense?

@@quinndepatten4442 I kinda get what you're saying about the criticism part. But how would you define confidence if it's not something you believe about yourself? Shouldn't that come from an internal source, at least based on evidence? Guess what I'm saying is ego and confidence seem to have a bit of a paradox because there is at least some comparison going on, otherwise how would you feel you have a particular strength if it was normal/average.

🐸📝

That depends on where you are coming from, the practice hasn't got anything to do with your intentions.

To be gay

@@xianxua2054 gay pog