Definitely T-Shirt and Mug worthy. 😂

This.

i think we all do

It looks more believably real than anything ILM, Paramount, or CBS have come up with, and that is really saying something.

the fin ruins it

@Seth Thomas Seth has zero, class.

they allready made warp 7 in the 2160s, but since this vessel is not a pure starfleet vessel it might have a lower rate core that goes warp 5-6 at cruise speed but if you realy can squeeze out all of the jouice of the engine, i might dips on redline at warp 7, similar to how the old warp 5 engine did at 5.2 in Enterprise.

+1 to this!

I'd like to request lighting and texturing tutorials to this.

Count me in!

Eric question what how far back woupd ot be possible to have tue consitution class in the drawing design boards. As early as 2200?

Yeah. I love designing 3D ships, and tips from Henry would be incredibly helpful!

I think by dropping the few Trek copyrighted instruments (ie star trek logos and a few copyrighted names), he could release it as an independent production and not be hampered by CBS/Paramount corporation. the 'aesthetic' is very hard to prove as copyright infringement, so could keep that.

I mean, YOU all know and love. I've always hated Star Trek designs prior to First Contact with the Anti-Borg warships like Akira and Sabre.

Mik Moen You are a strange little man.

@@MikMoen I think being exposed to old Trek really helps. It was a big design shift, going from curved to edged.

@@MandoMTL I was actually exposed to old Trek, well old as in the early TNG episodes. Thru TNG, DS9, Voyager and Enterprise I never liked the idea of just connecting two long nacelles onto a saucer with sticks. When the designs started getting more complex and robust was when I liked them more. The Engle Class from ST: Discovery is a very good example. It looks like a Carrier and I love it.

P)

They kinda did it but only with the interior.

And right before the Kelvin.

@@Alkonium What is the Kelvin? I have never heard of this. Is that some sort of paradody of Trek, like Orville.... Wait no the Orville is the REAL Star Trek now, not Disgracery, Pukehard, Upper Deckers...... Star Trek ended in 2004 with the end of the Vulcan civil war arch that lead to the beginning of the Earth/Romulan War. You cannot convince me otherwise and to say anything other is heresy that I will not frelling accept.

@@stagalgiz1097 Wow. You sure convinced me.

Then you have no taste

@@jeibal02 I am okay with that.

@@RamdomGuy1337 No need to worry anyway. Only people who have no idea what taste is would claim that someone else lacks it.

Well it's not an Enterprise clone if that's what you mean.

website says august 2020

@@garble7 hello, it's august now.

CBS happened

CBS and Covid probably seriously complicated that August 2020 date

@@Skydrag.V60 No it's just CBS, their fan film guidelines are so strict that no one can make fan films anymore

Is it ever said on screen as an acronym ? I always imagine it always imagined - not that is was said youspa but you-esper myself. I only really recall it being written down or said in full - unless Voyager said it out-loud when they mentioned it.

Same, love a ship with realistic details mixed with the sci-fi elements

Rising Horizon Gaming I’m not a TOS fan either, but I would have appreciated some visual continuity. Instead, we got ships that wouldn’t have looked out of place post-Voyager, but definitely look out of place for the era they are set in.

@@themetalstickman Continuity is a good thing. But i think too much is being made of the fact that a modern show, chose to go a different way look wise. Now if a person doesn't like the story, i get that. There was a lot of stories in TNG and deep space 9 that were bad too. I just think looks are being used as this scapegoat for a massive outcry against discovery. At least there was a new star Trek.

I don't mind updating the interior look, but keeping the same external look would have been nice. Besides which, that pizza wheel ship looks dumb as hell. Its made almost entirely out of sharp edges, and looks like no other Starfleet vessel before or after, even within the Kelvin timeline.

Rising Horizon Gaming The previously rejected Discovery ship design looks like garbage, especially with the dumb spinning saucer spore drive nonsense. The interior is even worse. It’s looks like a depressing, lensflare filled dungeon. There is zero respect for the decades of already established Trek continuity. TNG, DS9 and even Enterprise all show the original TOS design and aesthetics, and it works just fine. If they actually gave a shit, they would’ve left the TOS era alone and set the show decades after Nemesis. At least then there would be some kind of explanation for why the technology and everything else looks almost nothing like Star Trek.

Incadazant01 exactly. The interiors have to be updated, and I think the JJ movies did that well. The exteriors can be updated much more easily without changing the overall aesthetic.

Yeah! I wanna get a Ticket to Ride on that Sweety!! =D

It's neither, simply Pacific 201. Henry has said as much in interviews, such as the one at Trekyards, look that up. Pacific is a UESPA vessel, as they state in this video, _not a Starfleet vessel;_ it simply has some Starfleet personnel seconded to it for the mission.

@@xheralt As was the SS Vector, during the second part, I assume?

Primary hull designation NCC 201

He has an entire video on it somewhere.

That's what good designs make you feel.

It's the secondary hull to me. it's out of proportion. But i really enjoyed the video despite that.

Joe Laton In addition to that, i just realised that the Pacific is very very similar to a Constellation class, if you replace the Pacific’s secondary hull cylinder with a downward fin and nacelles it would be very proto Constellation (which i now would like to see, to be honest because i like EC Henry’s ship aesthetic)

Having all the sensitive communications gear and sensor array right between the two nacelles (that look like they leak a lot of _…blue light?)_ does seem like a recipe for interference, but then if the nacelles were stuck underneath there's the same argument for the planetary sensors, except as I write this I realise you wouldn't be using warp and planetary analysis at the same time. And the planetary sensors explain the shortened secondary hull. Perhaps a *external feature underneath* to show the *planetary sensors* and therefore give a visual cue as to why the secondary hull is so stubby. A elaboration of the centre of the underside of the saucer section. The nacelles blocking the sensors/communications on top could be remedied by simply *moving the dish* ect *to the top of the fin,* which makes sense in a "naval design", it can even rotate for that extra rendering processor headache. But generally arrays are stuck at the very top. And if the nacelles were underneath as well, cross bracing with the secondary hull, the nacelles and the saucer section - maybe as a variant or "Miranda" version of the ship. Do the two large shuttles in dedicated bays have any warp capability? Even warp 1 would be useful for moving around in system. (NX shuttles had no warp).

@@casbot71 no the larger shuttles are sublight only.

I like Disco, but agree at least that they should not have shit canned Fanfilms like they did!

I'm pretty sure that if they adopted this idea, fans would still complain. The ship looks more advanced than the 1960s TOS ships. Fans fail to realize that making Star Trek made today would look nothing like the old films and Series.

True but this is a experimental/exploration design plus some of the official cannon ships of the pre kirk era were complete dogs as well and dont forget this is a amateur production and CBS/Paramounts dickish behaviour to fan made films/projects of late.

My second favorite kind of design is one I don’t like but still has unmistakable talent behind it. Although, I do like the Pacific and believe it shows loads of talent.

Agreed the NX Class is so much of a nicer looking Ship

I don't think it's very hard to acquire

Better than the Saladin class

This sort of "primitive" functional design actually seems done better than they did in ENT, lol.

Are you kidding me my friend because Trump mentioned the space force the Navy and Airforce of screaming and pulling each other titties about who gets to be the command of a vessel in Space the Navy said they should be the one because they got the experience of navigation the Air Force say we got the experience because we categorize anomalies in air and space I mean come on Manny I literally bitch slapping each other about who gets to command the 4th correction V branch, as far as the Navy's concerned there's no way in hell they want to see the Air Force in charge of space

@@RedDawn370 Sorry, but that's an extreme contradictory if you support both Donald Trump's antics AND Gene Roddenbarry's vision. Star Trek is basically a Leftist future. The Mirror Universe is more inline with what would happen if Trump was influential well into the future.

He does do an exceptionally good job pitching his 3d models. There are alot of good artists out there but EC puts the extra work in to sell it. He's got me thinking: What can I do to draw in potential collaborators?

@@MrBranboom I'm a writer, and, honestly, I'd love to have him do the "Car Commercial" for one of the ships in my stories...

@@RedDawn370 Real quick, what the hell does Trump have to do with anything he said? Genuinely curious. He was talking about the way EC Henry narrates the videos. Never once was "Orange Man Bad" ever mentioned. This comment makes no sense, same with the one below it. Trump has nothing to do with what he said, or this ship, or the designs of "Pacific 201". End of my small rant.