Einstein on God

  Рет қаралды 2,594,352

dracumelenios

dracumelenios

14 жыл бұрын

This video discusses the spiritual beliefs of Prof. Albert Einstein and how they have been a subject for debate in recent years.

Пікірлер: 9 700
@BubbaZen10
@BubbaZen10 8 жыл бұрын
As a believer, i appreciate Einstein's view on this. The fact is, he was one of the greatest scientists of all time, and yet, still believed there was something more, something possibly ordering it.
@skullo5557
@skullo5557 2 жыл бұрын
you will actually find many scientific geniuses that are deists (believe a god exists but doesn’t intervene) or agnostic (doesn’t believe but doesn’t rule out). It is very interesting
@GrubKiller436
@GrubKiller436 2 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a sleight of hand you just made. The feeling of awe and beauty is not necessarily a belief that someone/something orders everything.
@grouchbugs
@grouchbugs 2 жыл бұрын
"Whether we conceive nature under the attribute or extension or under the attribute of thought or under any other attribute, we will find on and the same order-or-one and the same connection of causes." Spinoza. Think about it, then think about it some more. Then read Spinoza. It helps
@BubbaZen10
@BubbaZen10 2 жыл бұрын
@@grouchbugs Not sure i totally agree with him, but i do think that God essentially IS the universe, and everything in it.
@MarvinandErica
@MarvinandErica Жыл бұрын
Same
@jeffreychavey4161
@jeffreychavey4161 6 жыл бұрын
I think that Einstein felt humbled by the vastness and ordered aspect of the observable universe and so felt compelled to keep his options open. Unique thinker
@tongleekwan1324
@tongleekwan1324 Жыл бұрын
No matter how vast the universe, no matter what human beings can know about the universe, it doesn't mean believers can justifiably plug in the idea of "the god of the gaps"_---it doesn't imply ' god' made the universe, it really doesn't make sense to plug in or to purportedly smuggle the idea of an idea created by illiterates two millennium ago
@ginajustiniano84
@ginajustiniano84 5 жыл бұрын
I don't pretend to know why I was created But I do know that Im innately passionate about helping others and exploring PEOPLE, other fellow human beings their cultures, exotic places And making a positive impact on others and spreading LOVE to ALL not just to a choosen elite and segregate myself from people who are different then I
@olo3113
@olo3113 3 жыл бұрын
:))
@andrewmiller2670
@andrewmiller2670 2 жыл бұрын
I can’t stand when people try to explore me. I appreciate the candid that see me in action or hear what I’m saying without catalyst or a prying soul. Some won’t leave people alone, some just want to be left alone.
@jasonwood4039
@jasonwood4039 Жыл бұрын
It's beautiful thank you
@Gordesm
@Gordesm 4 жыл бұрын
" Reality is the physical form of consciousness. The human body is a flesh and blood vehicle for The Spirit, an avatar for consciousness. We are all one in the same. Love always !
@hiphopwonderboy2117
@hiphopwonderboy2117 4 жыл бұрын
@Tim H Hey shut the fuck up! You dam hater! At least she actually wasted they're time just to make sense to rats like you and all you do is be a fucking a dickhead go back to your gamer headset, "ok boomer" kid
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 3 жыл бұрын
The body is an illusion created by consciousness and your illusion that consciousness "inhabits" the body like a ghost living in a puppet is absurd. It would mean that consciousness occupies space and moves around-- but space is a creation of consciousness, you are always 'here, now" because there is nowhere else to be.
@shahidmohammadi3117
@shahidmohammadi3117 3 жыл бұрын
U sound like a cult member
@Gordesm
@Gordesm 3 жыл бұрын
@@shahidmohammadi3117 you figured that from reading a paragraph? But what does your heart say ?
@HpHH83
@HpHH83 3 жыл бұрын
@@hjalmar.poelzig Is DNA and personality an illusion too?
@nycinstyle
@nycinstyle 9 жыл бұрын
Albert Einsetin was not an atheist. He realized that humans and their knowledge of the universe and all we can know was unable to answer the question of "how it all got here" and whether or not there was a Creator (of everything) and lawgiver who set everything in motion. General relativity predicts a true beginning of the universe and is theoretically in line with the idea of a Creator. In the very beginning what brought about the universe? He was simply agnostic and admitted he could not know the answer. He was far too intelligent to declare himself an atheist and understood God could not be ruled out by science just as (at least at that time and it currently remains so) science can not prove there is a Creator (God), either. Einstein was not an atheist, explaining at one point: "I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal god is a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being."[1] According to Prince Hubertus, Einstein said, "In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views."[19] Einstein had previously explored the belief that man could not understand the nature of God. In an interview published in 1930 in G. S. Viereck's book Glimpses of the Great, Einstein, in response to a question about whether or not he defined himself as a pantheist, explained: Your question is the most difficult in the world. It is not a question I can answer simply with yes or no. I am not an Atheist. I do not know if I can define myself as a Pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. May I not reply with a parable? The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe. We are in the position of a little child, entering a huge library whose walls are covered to the ceiling with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written those books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books, a mysterious order, which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of the human mind, even the greatest and most cultured, toward God. We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only dimly. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations.
@MikeSmith-ih9lx
@MikeSmith-ih9lx 9 жыл бұрын
nycinstyle Yep. At the end of the day believers can't prove that God exist and science can't prove God doesn't exists. Personally, I believe in God/Supreme being. I love science and what it has done for mankind but science is too primitive right now to deal with the the non-material world (science is great for the physical realm).
@jeremiahhernandez9757
@jeremiahhernandez9757 9 жыл бұрын
Yea but he didn't believe in god
@wifegrant
@wifegrant 9 жыл бұрын
IsAAc H Not a personal God, but in the God of Spinoza.He believed the universe itself is intelligent and possesses thought. I find it shameful that militant atheists and evangelical extremists always resort to lies. Dawking is a fraud, an equivalent of a televangelist preacher. He should stick to evolutionary biology and leave philosophy or history to the experts.
@nycinstyle
@nycinstyle 9 жыл бұрын
IsAAc H Einstein was agnostic exactly as I said. He did not know and the great, humble man that he was admitted this. He did not feel there was no God. He did not believe a God could answer a person's prayers, etc. (a personal God)but throughout his life he could never come to the idea that there was no God (a Creator and scientific lawgiver). "There are no laws without a lawgiver, etc." General relativity also mathematically proved there is a beginning of all we can know which is also in line with belief in a God. It should be noted that at first Einstein did not believe his general relativity equations could be correct because they were not showing there is a static (always existent universe). He struggled with this contradiction. How can mathematics say there is an actual beginning yet everything else at that time said the universe was static (always existent)? He decided to add a cosmological constant to his equations to wipe out the necessity of a beginning. Around this time, Edwin Hubble observed through his telescope that distant galaxies are actually expanding, the expansion suggesting that the universe is not static, after all. He called Einstein who viewed the evidence through the telescope. Einstein realized that if the universe is expanding then it must have a starting point. His initial equations were correct after all and he called his cosmological constant he added the biggest mistake of his career. It is almost as if the heavens talked back to tell Einstein to stick fast with his equations and do not attempt to change them. Once again, Einstein could never come to accept that all could be without a God. By the way, general relativity is the most tested theory in the history of science. It has always been shown to be correct. "That deep emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God.”
@wifegrant
@wifegrant 9 жыл бұрын
Too bad Dawking is too much of an intellectual fraud to admit the whole truth. But the truth i guess doesn't sell books.
@christiancampos7094
@christiancampos7094 10 жыл бұрын
Religion without science religion is blind faith, science without religion,is boring.- Albert Einstein.
@dgh469
@dgh469 10 жыл бұрын
nonsense... einstein did not find science "without religion" to be boring !!!
@AlliancedTrolls
@AlliancedTrolls 10 жыл бұрын
This is how religious people edit Einstein's quotes. Let me use the quote above. "....Science...is blind faith....without religion..." Tada! An Albert Einstein quote successfully manipulated to benefit the Church!
@AlliancedTrolls
@AlliancedTrolls 10 жыл бұрын
What I interpret Einstein's reasoning is that he considered religion as morals and how they are utilized to benefit people is simply science.
@dgh469
@dgh469 10 жыл бұрын
well at least he never suggested that science might benefit mankind ... :) read the book: "the Human side", please
@christiancampos7094
@christiancampos7094 10 жыл бұрын
***** Aithesm requires the principles of faith as well. You have no evidence to contradict the exist of the idealogy of a diety it self.
@equliguemasse6314
@equliguemasse6314 8 жыл бұрын
Children of the Church of Atom incoming.....
@vlmpapc
@vlmpapc 3 жыл бұрын
nice fallout reference
@doubleoyimmy1572
@doubleoyimmy1572 2 жыл бұрын
At least you can see Atom lol
@kausmut4101
@kausmut4101 7 жыл бұрын
"I cannot conceive of a god who rewards and punishes his creatures or has a will of the kind we experience in ourselves. Neither can I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives his physical death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egotism, cherish such thoughts. I am satisfied with the mystery of the eternity of life and a glimpse of the marvelous structure of the existing world, together with the devoted striving to comprehend a portion, be it ever so tiny, of the Reason that manifests itself in Nature." - Albert Einstein
@amensela1359
@amensela1359 7 жыл бұрын
Kaus Mut , Luke 12:13-21 13And one of the company said unto him, Master, speak to my brother, that he divide the inheritance with me. 14And he said unto him, Man, who made me a judge or a divider over you? 15And he said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man's life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth. 16And he spake a parable unto them, saying, The ground of a certain rich man brought forth plentifully: 17And he thought within himself, saying, What shall I do, because I have no room where to bestow my fruits? 18And he said, This will I do: I will pull down my barns, and build greater; and there will I bestow all my fruits and my goods. 19And I will say to my soul, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry. 20But God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided? 21So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God.
@dracumelenios
@dracumelenios 10 жыл бұрын
The problem with using faith as a truth compass is that faith does not have to be grounded in facts and so it is like a compass which does not have to point to the North but could be pointing at any direction.
@mastertheillusion
@mastertheillusion 10 жыл бұрын
Well said drac. Then there is the problem with using a moral compass based on questionable codes that includes an allowance for slavery. Exodus 20-21 =P
@fasteddie4145
@fasteddie4145 9 жыл бұрын
that's why it's called "faith"
@dracumelenios
@dracumelenios 9 жыл бұрын
***** Why confuse faith with faith in Jesus in particular? You could have faith in many more things than just religions. In fact people can have faith in anything at all, that is the point. Yes, some choose to let their faith be informed by the evidence, but insofar the evidence is compelling, then it is not mere faith anymore, it becomes knowledge.
@jrgenlorange2992
@jrgenlorange2992 9 жыл бұрын
LOL
@LucisFerre1
@LucisFerre1 9 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Some beliefs are sound, others are foolish. Faith is about the person, not about the veracity of the subject believed. I've always found it bizarre that their evidence of something out there (supposedly objective existence) is subjective personal faith. That's pretty idiotic, like saying that scared children is evidence of under-bed monsters.
@themanthelegendjmw
@themanthelegendjmw 9 жыл бұрын
This is not "Einstein on God" its Richard Dawkins on Einstein.
@Gericho49
@Gericho49 6 жыл бұрын
Darwin lamented that any mind evolved from lower ape-like creatures would be capable of knowing and uttering truth claims. My guess is b/c honesty is not a desirable survival strategy. Unlike Dawkins who is making a fortune out of proselytizing his atheistic worldview, my belief doesn’t rise or fall on the very amateurish and confusing theology of great scientists like Einstein. Unlike Dawkins and his disciples I make sure when I quote a 3rd party, that the source is reliable and accurate. There are a lot of contradicting God quotes attributed to Einstein that cant all be true. I just cant believe he would make such a litany of befuddled unintelligible observations about the nature of ultimate reality . Unlike Dorkins I look at all citations before I draw conclusions about what he did or didn’t believe at various stages of his life. E.g a pantheist god as described by Dawkins would not be capable of creating a miraculous universe but one which Einstein would describe as a lawless, lifeless chaos. When he said *God doesn’t play dice* what Einstein is implying is that God didn’t need to create an infinite number of “incomprehensible” universes (multiverses) to eventually get one like ours that he describes as rationally comprehensible and life supporting So what did Einstein actually say? “You find it strange that I consider the comprehensibility of the world (to the extent that we are authorized to speak of such a comprehensibility as a miracle or as an eternal mystery. Well, a priori, one should expect a CHAOTIC world, which cannot be grasped by the mind in any way… That is the “miracle” which is being constantly reinforced as our knowledge expands. A. Einstein, *Letters to Solovine, translated by Wade Baskin* "As a child I received instruction both in the Bible and in the Talmud. I am a Jew, but I am enthralled by the luminous figure of the Nazarene....No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life." I am not an atheist, and I don’t think I can call myself a pantheist… We see the universe marvellously arranged and obeying certain laws, but only dimly understand these laws. Our limited minds grasp the mysterious force that moves the constellations. *(Max Jammer, Einstein and Religion, Princeton University Press, p44)* "Everyone who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. *(Max Jammer, Einstein and Religion, Princeton University Press, p93* When asked whether he was an atheist, Einstein said *"I'm not an atheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library with books in many languages..." Also, "There are people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views". (Einstein, His life and universe, Isaacson, p.388-9).* As to whether he believed in a personal God, u be the judge: When asked about a clipping from a magazine article (likely the Saturday Evening Post) reporting Einstein's comments on Christianity taken down by Viereck, Einstein carefully read the clipping and replied, "That is what I believe."[6] Interviewer" To what extent are you influenced by Christianity?" "As a child, I received instruction both in the Bible and in the Talmud. I am a Jew, but I am enthralled by the luminous figure of the Nazarene." "Have you read Emil Ludwig's book on Jesus? "Emil Ludwig's Jesus," replied Einstein, "is shallow. *Jesus is too colossal for the pen of phrasemongers, however artful. No man can dispose of Christianity with a bon mot." "Unquestionably. No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life. How different, for instance, is the impression which we receive from an account of legendary heroes of antiquity like Theseus. Theseus and other heroes of his type lack the authentic vitality of Jesus.* "The more I study science the more I believe in God" So Albert, which god might that be , the one you have now met?
@taghowland7662
@taghowland7662 5 жыл бұрын
What is beyond our universe? Emptiness, there is nothing there. Belief in faith is relative to our death. Faith calms our fear of death, its nonsensical. Accept what is NOT what might be. . .
@shinertaz
@shinertaz 5 жыл бұрын
Tag Howland is time linear and what is consciousness
@emiel1976ep
@emiel1976ep 5 жыл бұрын
You only hear what you want to hear, just like how you read what you want to read. You don't listen just as you don't read what is written because as you did, you couldn't take the Bible serious and you would see the truth about what is written. You are denying reality because you can't accept the truth that is different from your beliefs and world views.
@ZlatnoPeroTV
@ZlatnoPeroTV 5 жыл бұрын
@@Gericho49 I just wanna thank you for writing such a long and detailed comment. It's rare to see something good in the comment section, regardless if I agree or disagree.
@beverlyd.cheney681
@beverlyd.cheney681 8 жыл бұрын
Always practice safety. Einstein is one of my favorite scientists. Thanks for the information.
@Drakemiser
@Drakemiser 8 жыл бұрын
Dawkins accuses religious groups of trying to pull Einstein to their side while trying to pull Einstein to his side.
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 3 жыл бұрын
Einstein and Dawkins were on the same side all along, Einstein was just a little more mellow about it than Dawkins is.
@a.bagasm.7253
@a.bagasm.7253 3 жыл бұрын
@@hjalmar.poelzig no
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 3 жыл бұрын
@@a.bagasm.7253 Einstein, like virtually all physicists since the late 19th century didn't believe in any sort of personal god, that is, one with self-awareness, will, intentions or goals. He thought of God the way humanists and secular Jews do, as a tradional character that expresses our fears and desires in symbolic form, a means of communicating moral values and a psychological coping mechanism. To Einstein, taking God literally is as childish as taking Santa Claus literally-- but that is not to say that belief in them should be ridiculed, discouraged or suppressed. All gods are real for those who believe in them.
@guacamoleniqqapeniss7317
@guacamoleniqqapeniss7317 3 жыл бұрын
@@hjalmar.poelzig lmao so here's an atheist trying to forcely align einstein in their track. He said he is not an atheist period
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 3 жыл бұрын
@@guacamoleniqqapeniss7317 You are the one trying to put the label of "atheist" on me. My ideas and Einstein's are perfectly in concert-- neither of us believe in a personal god who has conscious thoughts or intentions, makes decisions or seeks to achieve goals.
@jscottupton
@jscottupton 9 жыл бұрын
In the last 100 years scientists have made far more progress in understanding the universe than in all of human history before that. Never the less scientists are not one bit closer to proving or disproving the existence of god.
@NateStice
@NateStice 9 жыл бұрын
***** What do you mean "when people make claims about what god does in the world, the claims can be tested"? can you give an example? I guess I just don't follow.
@NateStice
@NateStice 9 жыл бұрын
***** O ok I get what you are saying, So basically all you where trying to say is that yes "scientists are not any closer to proving or disproving the existence of god." But neither are religious people in proving the existence of god?
@NateStice
@NateStice 9 жыл бұрын
***** wait.. what part was a lie?
@GarretKrampe
@GarretKrampe 9 жыл бұрын
***** And you clearly never heard of ERGOT
@racyracy4232
@racyracy4232 9 жыл бұрын
J Scott Upton IIN THE LAST 100 YEARS WE HAVE DONE MORE THAN THE LAST THOUSAND YEARS, I KNOW WHY, DO YOU?
@tonyhall9681
@tonyhall9681 9 жыл бұрын
_"I do NOT believe in a personal god and I have NEVER denied this"_ (Albert Einstein) I mean, that couldn't possibly be any clearer. So when will religious people finally stop pretending "Einstein was a believer"?
@jimchumley6568
@jimchumley6568 6 жыл бұрын
Tony Hall He wasnt a believer and i dont need Eisteins opinion of God.
@MixtapeKilla2004
@MixtapeKilla2004 6 жыл бұрын
Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
@johnmotherfuckincoltrane1242
@johnmotherfuckincoltrane1242 8 жыл бұрын
"I am not an atheist."-Albert Einstein
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 5 жыл бұрын
Just because Einstein didn't want to be called an atheist doesn't mean he believed in your particular version of God. When Einstein said that the US was in the midst of an anti-Communist witch hunt and declaring oneself an 'atheist" was dangerous to one's career and immigration status.
@redlady9219
@redlady9219 5 жыл бұрын
Why are you so offended?
@gastonflatulenza1276
@gastonflatulenza1276 3 жыл бұрын
@@hjalmar.poelzig Einstein was already a citizen by the time McCarthy came along. And, in addition, he said that if Joe McCarthy ever came after him he would not claim the 5th Amendment as most did, but the First Amendment to think and believe as he wished as guaranteed in the Constitution. Einstein loved Baruch Spinoza and read him widely. Spinoza and Einstein both believed in God, but not really in religion, and not in a God who was involved in people's lives and problems (a "personal" God). Everyone is entitled to believe in God as we can conceptualize Him/Her/It. Or not. But Einstein did.
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 3 жыл бұрын
​@@gastonflatulenza1276 Joe McCarthy ruined the careers and lives of many US citizens. Citizenship was no protection during the Red Scare. It sent many to prison and some to their deaths. Einstein and Spinoza used the word "god" to mean an impersonal principle, an underlying basis of reality, not the sky daddy of conservative Christian mythology, which Einstein dismissed as "childish." Of course religious fundamentalists rely on arguments by authority so they've tried to conscript Einstein into their cult.
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 3 жыл бұрын
@boxers nation Einstein believed in religion but he didn't believe in God. He thought of God as a symbolic character in our religious traditions. He had respect for the value of his Jewish heritage. Conservative Christians can't grasp this about secular Jews like Einstein.
@mscwup
@mscwup 9 жыл бұрын
How right and correct he was and is today!
@TheTradingmajic
@TheTradingmajic 10 жыл бұрын
Okay, personal or impersonal he still believed in God. A creator. Also, there is a huge difference between religion and God. Just because a person does not believe in religion does not mean they don't believe in God...There is nothing presented here that shows Einstein is an atheist...
@yoshibootz
@yoshibootz 10 жыл бұрын
hell yeah
@dracumelenios
@dracumelenios 10 жыл бұрын
Congratulations! This video never meant to present Einstein as an atheist... it clearly states Einstein was Deist, and this is Dawkins speaking no less.
@TheTradingmajic
@TheTradingmajic 10 жыл бұрын
dracumelenios Really, then perhaps you want to present people who are saying that instead of presenting all those who are trying to prove he was atheist. When you support a position you do it with supporting evidence not all these people trying to minimize his theology.
@dracumelenios
@dracumelenios 10 жыл бұрын
TheTradingmajic No, it was Einstein himself who 'minimized' his theology once he saw that his earlier statements were being used to present him as theist which he was certainly not. Einstein did not believe in a conscious intelligent deity which does stuff on purpose or knows we exist. Einstein was a Deist like Spinoza or Diderot.
@TheTradingmajic
@TheTradingmajic 10 жыл бұрын
dracumelenios Agreed. Yes, he took that position publicly after coming under such fierce attacks. There is a war against all things God and no scientist who want's to keep a high position can admit to believing in a conscious personal creator. He also said, "Education is what you're left with after you've forgotten everything you learned in school...Yet, no one say's he didn't believe in education...
@suadqorraj8548
@suadqorraj8548 8 жыл бұрын
can anyone tell me what did that person said in the begining of the video ( something about theist , pantheist and some other things which i couldnt understand)
@TorbenRudgaard
@TorbenRudgaard 9 жыл бұрын
Difference between science and religion is....... Religion is based on FAITH, and Science is based on FACTS - In religion you can make up any story you want and nobody will care if its true, they won't even question it. - In science if you come with proof of something, everyone will question it and try to disprove it. And only if a lot of very smart people come up with the same results as you, then it can be called a fact!
@evanrussell9946
@evanrussell9946 8 жыл бұрын
Torben Rudgaard I feel like faith can be founded on facts. If I believe I can drop a rock and it falls 9.8 M/S^2 and it happens I have now have faith. "Faith without works is dead." So, if I do something and it turns out to work for me and others as well then I have faith. As opposed to just blind belief. There's a difference between faith and belief.
@sapphireraven2474
@sapphireraven2474 8 жыл бұрын
Nobody has ever made up a "religious" story and people believed it, let alone hadn't questioned it. Every Christian/Catholic has questioned the word of God. It's a natural thing. Now for your theory that religion is based on FAITH and science is based on FACT, I should remind you that most of these FACTS started off as theories which had to be tested and the religious stories we read in the Bible are in FACT not made up as they anticipate everything we know today. For example, (as a reminder, the Bible was written centuries before scientists existed...) the elements in our body. The Bible states that the Lord created us from the dust of the ground and only in the recent century did scientists figure out that the human body consists of 28 ground based materials including iron, magnesium and sulfur. I could go on and on about the many anticipated facts found in the bible, things those stories tell us that were not proven until recently but I know nothing I say will convince you.
@neilkorpal7437
@neilkorpal7437 8 жыл бұрын
Gerilene Mereb you are beautiful .LOVE GOD teacher
@narajuna
@narajuna 8 жыл бұрын
+Torben Rudgaard HA HA HA WHAT A DUMB DUMB IGNORANT FOOL YOUR ARE! Science is not fact nor is it based on factual evidence. Science is very simply the act of interpreting an observation of our environment and is limited by the tools we have available for observing. Then scientific fact as a result is only the most supported interpretation of scientific observation, or in other words, the most favored opinion of the things being observed.Throughout history every scientific observation, no matter how favorable, always has a dissenting opinion from a less favorable group. One thing that is factual about scientific opinions is that they will always be refuted. ALWAYS CHANGING.... think cap please!
@TorbenRudgaard
@TorbenRudgaard 8 жыл бұрын
Gerilene Mereb it still dont change the fact that it was made up. In 2000 years there is absolutely no proof what so ever that there are any gods and that all religious scripture wasn't just made up. Can you show me any evidence that everything written in e.g. the bible was not just made up by some roman fiction author?
@doeyehof
@doeyehof 10 жыл бұрын
Some Quotes from Albert Einstein "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." "Imagination is more important than knowledge." "I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details." "The only real valuable thing is intuition." "A person starts to live when he can live outside himself." "I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice." "God is subtle but he is not malicious." "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind." "Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds." "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." "God does not care about our mathematical difficulties. He integrates empirically."
@cyber151
@cyber151 10 жыл бұрын
Yes, by god he meant the god of spinozism, a branch of pantheism. Learn what god means in these terms and then substitute the definition, in for the word "god" in each of these sentences and then you will understand what he meant.
@doeyehof
@doeyehof 10 жыл бұрын
cyber151 Do you understand what I meant? Its not important at all! But this video is very shallow
@cyber151
@cyber151 10 жыл бұрын
Doeye Hof ???
@ridjwanahsheereen4754
@ridjwanahsheereen4754 3 жыл бұрын
No matter what, Einstein is always my most fav!❤️❤️❤️
@RobloxAces
@RobloxAces Жыл бұрын
He said Indians are stupid
@aspiknf
@aspiknf 10 ай бұрын
Well it was weird that he married his cousin...but when it comes to scientific discoveries, Albert Einstein was great.
@ram7bow
@ram7bow 8 жыл бұрын
I love einstien's hair and all the great thinking he did,...I love that he was so caught up in thinking, that at times he forgot to put his pants on...times when he forgot ,which way he was heading down the halls and had to stop and ask someone which way he was going as he stopped to ask them,.. which way he was going, so that, he knew whether he had eaten or not..He was a gifted man, no doubt about it....But he was just a man....a passionate man of scientist...not a theologian...He probably experienced more of the wonder of God than 50% of Christians out there ( of which I am one)...My faith is in no way hinged on a door of what anyone else thinks or believes, no matter the degree of intelligence or stupidity or ignorance for that matter...For those who disbelieve, there is no explanation to make them believe...for those who do believe, no explanations necessary....
@stevenstrnad4200
@stevenstrnad4200 10 жыл бұрын
“What I am really interested in knowing is whether God could have created the world in a different way.” - Albert Einstein
@williamlangley2044
@williamlangley2044 11 ай бұрын
Who knows maybe God did at point or another.
@aspiknf
@aspiknf 10 ай бұрын
@@williamlangley2044 Yes, maybe if the multiverse exists, there are many different combinations of worlds, and that is done by God.
@dracumelenios
@dracumelenios 10 жыл бұрын
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this." Albert Einstein
@rayinchrist1
@rayinchrist1 Жыл бұрын
@Rafin Khan shut up, islam is wicked. I HOPE ISLAM DIES!😊
@Georgy.J.M.Sassine
@Georgy.J.M.Sassine 5 ай бұрын
At that same hour Jesus rejoiced in the Holy Spirit and said, "I thank you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and the intelligent and have revealed them to infants (the humble); yes, Father, for such was your gracious will. (Luke10:21)
@MichaelCarmichael
@MichaelCarmichael 7 жыл бұрын
The narrator is Richard Dawkins who has devoted a great deal of thought and written extensively on the subject of "god."
@garypotter5569
@garypotter5569 3 жыл бұрын
'The Devils Delusion: Atheism and it's Scientific Pretensions' By Dr. David Berlinski Atheism may well not be a religion. Anti-theism very obviously is.
@poozer1986
@poozer1986 3 жыл бұрын
@@garypotter5569 would you claim anti terrorism to be a terrorist agenda?
@GrubKiller436
@GrubKiller436 2 жыл бұрын
@@poozer1986 Absolutely an anti-terrorist group could easily be a terrorist group.
@poozer1986
@poozer1986 2 жыл бұрын
@@GrubKiller436 Care to elaborate. That's like saying the Nazis were Pro Jewish
@GrubKiller436
@GrubKiller436 2 жыл бұрын
@@poozer1986 It doesn't apply to everything, but it applies when you take a benign, non-violent abstract idea and start enforcing that onto people in the real world. You become your own rigid, intolerant group. You could be so against terrorism that you create your own group that uses violence, threats, intimidation, and coercion onto people whom you think are your enemy, turning you into a terrorist group. Have you heard of Antifa? Antifa is a whole can of irony. They name themselves "Anti-Facists" but how they conduct themselves in the world is in principle how fascists would.
@Longtack55
@Longtack55 4 жыл бұрын
In January of 1954, just a year before his death, Albert Einstein wrote the following letter to philosopher Erik Gutkind after reading his book, "Choose Life: The Biblical Call to Revolt," January 3rd 1954 "The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can change this for me. For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstition." That's good enough for me.
@JosephusXIX
@JosephusXIX 9 жыл бұрын
That classic debate. Science and religion operate on 2 very different planes and with different purposes. The author in the letter, and my college Biology instructor, said it best, that religion and science are inherently incomparable due to their very nature. Religion is based on faith, not knowledge.
@ACIMessentials
@ACIMessentials 8 жыл бұрын
Ironic. I see it very differently. To me, the experience of God, JosephusXIX, is based on Knowledge. "You shall know the Truth and the Truth will make you free." One who does not know God, can only guess. Modern "science" is a belief system - every bit as much as "religion". "Religion" believes that God is real - without knowing what God is - and "science" believes that matter is real - even though it is coming to realize that M=E/C2,- that matter only appears to exist because of a relationship between light and energy/motion/vibration. All is light. God is light. To see it within yourself is a very special "proof" that might never be able to be measured by humans.
@adventurecapitalist5001
@adventurecapitalist5001 8 жыл бұрын
+ACIMessentials I call it confirmation. It is eye opening to me that so many believe the unproven ideas in all the textbooks. It does make sense when those textbooks are being taught to our cultural children. Otherwise, there are many pearls to be shared, yet this environment is questionable. We can show people the evidence that HE has shared with us and, yet if they choose to deny it, we have planted a seed. Be blessed.
@jimchumley6568
@jimchumley6568 6 жыл бұрын
JosephusXIX You can gather knowledge and fact and become a believer, what you are saying is not true.
@Longtack55
@Longtack55 4 жыл бұрын
"Faith" meaning exactly what other than imagination of what you want.
@yourkingdomcomeyourwillbedone
@yourkingdomcomeyourwillbedone Жыл бұрын
Science is based on the philosophy of materialism whereas Faith is based on the philosophy of immaterialism.
@emacsjohn8357
@emacsjohn8357 9 жыл бұрын
Religion is the one of the major causes of all the human conflicts that we had, have and will have.
@fdsfjhjtjtea6497
@fdsfjhjtjtea6497 6 жыл бұрын
stfu
@indigolynx243
@indigolynx243 6 жыл бұрын
Bollocks!
@boaoftheboaians
@boaoftheboaians 6 жыл бұрын
emac john so is anti-theism, especially in recent history. Stalin killed 23 million, Mao Zedong killed 78 million, many other millions died from communist suppression of religion, I am very sure of it.
@nycinstyle
@nycinstyle 6 жыл бұрын
Really it's not religion that is the cause of wars, it is the desire for control of resources like land, wealth, etc., and the control over other people and their actions that causes all wars. Religion (belief in a God) is immaterial. Wanting people not to follow a way of life that is detrimental to you, and wanting to take control over resources and of those people is the reason war happens. Even today. Do you care what belief another person or other people has/have in his or her or their head(s)? No.But when people try to impose their will over others in the name of religion or anything else to gain control you have wars.We dont see war breaking out over religion in the USA and many other"religious" countries, because it is against the law to use religion to commit crimes. You get locked up. In other words,it's not religion it is people's desire for control and greed that causes all wars.
@bipolarbear477
@bipolarbear477 6 жыл бұрын
Humans are the major conflicts that we have.
@stevenserial4080
@stevenserial4080 7 жыл бұрын
The only reason I believe in God is because I'm so good looking that only divine intervention can explain such beauty.
@Jake-be9ji
@Jake-be9ji 4 жыл бұрын
Steven Serial feel that
@ekamsidhu7547
@ekamsidhu7547 4 жыл бұрын
I love god
@user-dl1rn4te5c
@user-dl1rn4te5c 3 жыл бұрын
👍
@eineweitereratselhafteseel8801
@eineweitereratselhafteseel8801 3 жыл бұрын
Pmsl
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 3 жыл бұрын
@Jordan Kane Genes are an expression of the physical universe which, in one form or another, has always existed. Not created supernaturally.
@kaydenparkman3000
@kaydenparkman3000 7 жыл бұрын
When he was like ten years old his dad gave him a compass it always pointed north
@dontquityourdaydreams2416
@dontquityourdaydreams2416 10 жыл бұрын
Einstein gets me! It's like someone finally put my thoughts into words. How awesome.
@stevenstrnad4200
@stevenstrnad4200 10 жыл бұрын
“I want to know how God created this world. I want to know his thoughts.” - Albert Einstein
@Gericho49
@Gericho49 8 жыл бұрын
My faith in God hardly rises or falls on the amateurish philosophies of a great scientist but there seem to be a lot quotes attributed to Einstein by dubious doubters with a point to prove. Here is a verifiable citation that can be validated : When asked about a clipping from a magazine article (likely the Saturday Evening Post) reporting Einstein's comments on Christianity taken down by Viereck, [6] Einstein carefully read the clipping and replied, "That is what I believe." "To what extent are you influenced by Christianity?" "As a child, I received instruction both in the Bible and in the Talmud. I am a Jew, but I am enthralled by the luminous figure of the Nazarene." "Have you read Emil Ludwig's book on Jesus? "Emil Ludwig's Jesus," replied Einstein, "is shallow. Jesus is too colossal for the pen of phrase-mongers, however artful. No man can dispose of Christianity with a bon mot." "Unquestionably. No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life. How different, for instance, is the impression which we receive from an account of legendary heroes of antiquity like Theseus. Theseus and other heroes of his type lack the authentic vitality of Jesus." "My religiosity consists of a humble admiration of the infinitely superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God. Einstein, The Quotable Einstein, 2005, p195-6)
@LucisFerre1
@LucisFerre1 8 жыл бұрын
Supa Kai LOL. You're a real tool, aren't you.
@williamallman299
@williamallman299 7 жыл бұрын
You just proved the point made in the video that Christians misinterpret Einsteins' words, because they want to believe he is "on their side", but are unable to grasp intellectually his meaning. Here's another verifiable quote for you, simple enough that even you should be able to understand it: "I received your letter of June 10th. I have never talked to a Jesuit priest in my life and I am astonished by the audacity to tell such lies about me. From the viewpoint of a Jesuit priest I am, of course, and have always been an atheist." - Albert Einstein, letter to Guy H. Raner Jr, July 2, 1945 It is ironic that you imply Einstein had an amateurish philosophy yet you try to use his words to bolster your faith in God, and that you imply the quotes used in the video are not verifiable and then use another quote as if that disproves the validity of the quotes used, when all you did was copy and paste from what is obviously a Christian apologetic website,j as evidenced by the reference number [6] without the reference itself. Given that, in the two sentences which are your own words, you used redundancies twice ("dubious doubters" and "verifiable citation that can be validated") I seriously doubt you have the intellectual capacity to understand Einstein's personal philosophy or understand what he means by "God", but I can assure you it is not the same as yours.
@shaneleone4606
@shaneleone4606 7 жыл бұрын
Gerry De naro Amen brother... Perfectly said... God Bless you!
@williamallman299
@williamallman299 7 жыл бұрын
LucisFerre1 Thank you for saying so. I get tired of correcting people also, but out of immense respect for one of the greatest intellects in history, not to mention the most influential person of the past century, I feel honor bound to do so as he is incapable of defending himself. :-)
@LucisFerre1
@LucisFerre1 7 жыл бұрын
William Allman I fully undersand.
@williamlangley2044
@williamlangley2044 11 ай бұрын
I remember hearing from my physics teacher that Einstein jumped up and at play and shouted there's God and started to work on a the existence of God!
@soysushi
@soysushi 8 жыл бұрын
I am going to try and chime in here. Being someone that is curious about the why in everything. I do appreciate the metaphorical and artistic retorts from these great thinkers. As more and more study is being done about the human brain, the intuitions that Einstein had for the future is becoming true. I can see how he was able to make the statements that he did across all fields of academia, that once you know the why in certain behaviors or phenomenon, you can use what you have learned to solve more unknowns. He just thinks about everything at the same time. Although he would've greatly benefited if he could've been a better teacher. I think that he realized no matter what he said to others, his words would hold no credibility or weight behind it, like always, the best ideas are the ones that gets mocked at first because it is perceived as impossible. Again, I'm just seeing if I can get some feed-backs here because I think this would make an interesting debate.
@sacha_msky
@sacha_msky 10 ай бұрын
Hi, do u have instagram ?
@nswlawson2
@nswlawson2 8 жыл бұрын
Whatever Einstein was(Deist/Pantheist) if you believe in a personal god it's wrong to claim him as one of your own.
@BrainUser1
@BrainUser1 8 жыл бұрын
+Will C Indeed, a Creationist still, Intelligent design man as all impersonalists, soul is still always first, matter later.
@nightprowler6336
@nightprowler6336 6 жыл бұрын
Will C he was an agnostic theist.
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 3 жыл бұрын
@@BrainUser1 Mind cannot exist in disembodied form, soul emerges only through biological evolution.
@BrainUser1
@BrainUser1 3 жыл бұрын
@@hjalmar.poelzig You dont say, its made of chemicals also? Now why did Evolution mastermind that thing?
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 3 жыл бұрын
@@BrainUser1 Evolution doesn't "mastermind" anything. Matter doesnt need to be pushed around by mind to do what it does. Matter is made of energy and energy is change, it is in constant flux, changing ftom one form to another, creating patternsbof any degree of complexity. Intelligence is a weak phenomenon, it is responsible for almost no action in the universe, it is strictly an animal trait. Like a small child you think the universe revolves sround your personal concerns.
@lesliedellow1533
@lesliedellow1533 8 жыл бұрын
I wonder why Mr Dawkins didn't choose Max Planck to quote?
@sebastianramosflores7299
@sebastianramosflores7299 4 жыл бұрын
What concerto is it?
@cheshirecat8783
@cheshirecat8783 10 жыл бұрын
why are we fighting, the truth is there is no truth at the moment its just beliefs. i was raised as a christian but my beliefs changed it doesnt mean that i dont believe in god it means that i have to just admit i dont know if there is a god or not, neither outcome would surprise me. WE JUST DONT KNOW and we all have to realize this and come togethor as a species to reach our goals . im not saying to throw away your beliefs but we must admit that we just dont know
@cameronbridges1988
@cameronbridges1988 10 жыл бұрын
You are totally on the same page with me. I care nothing about what others think I believe what I believe only. I seem to pass back and forth where I will have a thought about a creator that really makes sense, then 2 months later I start having another thought towards a different direction. You are right we just don't know and for some of us we only want to 100% commit to something that we can see is definitely the right answer...I feel your pain!
@DrMontague
@DrMontague 10 жыл бұрын
We can ask questions about the nature of the gods or even the one god. They all have one thing in common they are evil and poor designers.
@DrMontague
@DrMontague 10 жыл бұрын
If religion wasn't challenged then we would still be burning witches.
@vicachcoup
@vicachcoup 10 жыл бұрын
DrMontague Yes. Atheist are more evolved - they use atomic bombs, drones and depleted uranium shells.
@DrMontague
@DrMontague 10 жыл бұрын
vicachcoup Atheists and religious scientists developed the Atomic bomb. Why? It was nothing to do with superstition. Here is the reason you dumb ass: The German nuclear energy project informally known as 'Uranium Society or Uranium Club', was an attempted clandestine scientific effort led by Germany to develop and produce atomic weapons during World War II. Now do you get the big picture you silly bunt?!
@wildoxidizer
@wildoxidizer 9 жыл бұрын
(The following is from Einstein and Religion by Max Jammer, Princeton University Press) "I'm not an atheist, and I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws. Our limited minds grasp the mysterious force that moves the constellations."
@jhondumaop1311
@jhondumaop1311 9 жыл бұрын
Einstein believe in God. What he don't believe is a personal God that other religion is talking about that limits the capacity of what God can do. He believes in a more intelligent and powerful being that a human mind can't grasp. Look at how vast our universe, where God is in dominion and is the Creator, then look at how significant our earth to the universe. Human intelligence is nothing and almost negligible. God sent us his words so someday we can be saved when he decided to end the world. Read the bible which is above all books.
@wildoxidizer
@wildoxidizer 9 жыл бұрын
Jhon Dumaop I agree. Truth be told Einstein is the only person who really knew what he believed.
@MikeSmith-ih9lx
@MikeSmith-ih9lx 9 жыл бұрын
Jhon Dumaop So you mean the Christian God is the true God. I believe in God but not the Christian/Islamic/Hindu or other Gods and not Buddha. Most people (99.99999999999%) who believe in their God don't know it but they are saying their God is stupid. Why would God create different religions and people on this earth when he could have just snapped his finger and everything could be fine. To me, either there is only one God or every religion is wrong. Its like comparing the culture of one race to another; my race is better because of this and that. We can go on debating forever why one race is better than others. Religion is different because people from different parts of the world are unique. Trust me God is not going to save any of us. I am from a small religion and what our scripture tell us is that there is only one God and he comes in different forms; we don't discriminate other religions but in fact embrace all religions because they are are created from God under one roof for the different races on this earth to match their cultures. You know why we humans were created based on my religion; we are just play toys for God like animal pets are to us. We are not anything special and sometimes we humans are too arrogant in believing that we are so special in this vast universe. We are just one plane of existence for there are so many other forms of lives out there we primitive humans have yet to find.
@jackwilliamatkins1158
@jackwilliamatkins1158 9 жыл бұрын
Mike Smith Jesus Christ bows to Sarxkyn Ketosis which cures all diseases in the human race. Therefore, all humans bow to Sarxkyn Ketosis.
@suaptoest
@suaptoest 6 жыл бұрын
Sure I'm a believer; I don't drink alcohol.
@Reporterreporter770
@Reporterreporter770 8 жыл бұрын
If this Audio file is borrowed from Dawkins book, thank you. ... i was looking to review it again it has set me free years ago when i most needed it
@GoddessOmegaDumnezeu
@GoddessOmegaDumnezeu 2 жыл бұрын
I thank you Albert Einstein for not being religious ! I Am also not religious ! My religion is KINDNESS !!
@tulliusagrippa5752
@tulliusagrippa5752 7 жыл бұрын
Well done, Richard. This is a very useful and much needed video!
@MRobert2l
@MRobert2l 7 жыл бұрын
Einstein did not believe in a creator god, or that the universe had an ultimate beginning at all-- he lived before the big Bang was generally accepted. The Big Bang is only the beginning of our own local universe, there may be other Big Bangs and other universes. Modern physics is more in harmony with concepts in Eastern thought about endless cycles. This upsets Creationists, who are trying to hijack Einstein into their ideology.
@athenakitty3
@athenakitty3 8 жыл бұрын
Science and religion do not cancel out each other, but rather exist in harmony. Science does not cancel out the existence of a God or religion nor does God/religion cancel out the need for science. It is when one of those things become grossly misunderstood that issues arise.
@bluegiant13
@bluegiant13 8 жыл бұрын
Intro song ?
@waltfrog7
@waltfrog7 7 жыл бұрын
It's odd to me that Einstein's most telling comment on religion is not included in this video. In his autobiographical notes, written around age 67 he said, " Thus I came ---though the child of completely irreligious (Jewish) parents--to a deep religiousness, which, however, reached an abrupt end at the age of twelve. Through reading of popular scientific books I soon reached the conviction that much in the stories of the Bible could not be true. The consequence was a positively fanatic (orgy of) free thinking coupled with the impression that youth is intentionally being deceived by the state through lies; it was a crushing impression." This according to his words engendered a life long mistrust of every kind of authority. This is quoted from a small book that was the closest Einstein ever came to writing an autobiography Thus to anyone who can read, Einstein's  opinion on religion is clear and unmistakable..
@dracumelenios
@dracumelenios 7 жыл бұрын
Yes, around the age of 12 he wrote his father a letter asking to be exempted from Sunday school so he could read science books.
@SkateLegMartin
@SkateLegMartin 9 жыл бұрын
Einstein was using God as a Spirit of all things which is the correct way of viewing God. It is written that God is the spirit of all things. He understood the true God. Not the God of fake teachers of religions. Man does not understand that he did believe but in a way which was not common in those times. For false teachers taught of a man in the sky. When truly the bible teaches in a different way. It is man has defiled the true interpretations of the bible & ancient teachings. & Einstein seemed to understand this & see through it. He did not want people to think he believed as others believed in a false version of God as a person in the sky.
@kellykitkat40
@kellykitkat40 8 жыл бұрын
It is written, We walk by Faith and not by sight.
@iy3165
@iy3165 8 жыл бұрын
This video was presented in a very impressive amusing way. I Like it so much
@DrMontague
@DrMontague 10 жыл бұрын
The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.(Albert Einstein to Eric Gutkind from Princeton in January 1954)
@dweezeltheyounger
@dweezeltheyounger 10 жыл бұрын
I'm sure he has a different opinion today.
@DrMontague
@DrMontague 10 жыл бұрын
dweezel theyounger If so then he be calling god an evil and sadistic shit!
@tonymontana-is2ci
@tonymontana-is2ci 10 жыл бұрын
These people that deny God sound so negative like they almost live a shitty live. Just say you don't believe but don't imply people who do believe in God are weak and childish. The funny thing is the more Science advances, the more the so called "myths" of the bible are proven to have existed and thus deny the people that deny God.
@DrMontague
@DrMontague 10 жыл бұрын
tony montana Science shows the bible yo be wrong. This is the reason theists play on semantics. Richard Dawkins is an atheists and lives a full life. So is Steven Hawkins.Religious people look all right on the surface but many of them are totally screwed up which is not surprising since they tend to read the bible.
@dracumelenios
@dracumelenios 10 жыл бұрын
tony montana People who deny God? Which God? People believe in many Gods and the majority of people are non Christian. Also, skepticism is nowhere near as conclusive as denial, especially your own favorite brand of god-denial i.e. being a self confessed Christian. See, to be called a Christian if anything you have to conclusively deny 99.99% of all Gods in human culture, from the monkey god Hanuman to Einstein's blind spirit in the nature's laws, and guess what... that makes you a more hardened god denier than most skeptics.
@AdamHMortimer
@AdamHMortimer 4 жыл бұрын
This feels like a greatly biased opinion coming from one of the world's great atheists.
@Aydrenn
@Aydrenn 3 жыл бұрын
Judging by who you are subscribed to, this comment seems like a greatly biased opinion coming from a theist.
@altobyy4855
@altobyy4855 2 жыл бұрын
Einstein was a thiest. He was a panthiest and was infact religious. End of debate.
@erikhviid3189
@erikhviid3189 2 жыл бұрын
@@altobyy4855 : Do you know his “God letter” ? Written to the german philosopher Eric Gutkind the 9 january 1954. Einstein was “pissed of” because Gutkind “accused” him, Einstein, of being religious. He wrote - translated from german : all religions are incarnations of primitive/childish superstition. Call that words from a theist !
@quadbravo
@quadbravo 8 жыл бұрын
This is a really poor video on the topic. It's as if they tried to take sound bites from his some of his commentary to suggest Einstein did not believe in God. Einstein believed in God but just not one that was personal or One you had to pray to. His Theory of Relativity was pursued because, in his words, "I want to know God 's thoughts in a mathematical way ". What more do you need? This video really just splits hairs on issues needlessly and seems to focus on Catholic commentary at the time. The woman orator is terrible. Over acting and just stuffy.
@akiracornell
@akiracornell 8 жыл бұрын
+Tim H tim..... what would we do if sheldrake is right about external consciousness? or metamorphic resonance? it almost sounds spiritual dont it? if we reverse engineer that....it opens the idea maybe our own thoughts arnt really all are own....and dimensions infront of us exist we cant see..... kind of like einstein sayin our crude abilty to percieve the world is bound by the assemblance of our matter. like ghosts or spirits?
@Gnomefro
@Gnomefro 8 жыл бұрын
+quadbravo _"His Theory of Relativity was pursued because, in his words, "I want to know God 's thoughts in a mathematical way ". What more do you need? "_ Quite a bit more actually, because if I wanted to know what God thought, I would not sit down in an office attempting to produce my own mathematical description of spacetime. There's no question that whatever Einstein thought about gods, he used the word "god" in a poetic way most of the time and your example is clearly one of those.
@quadbravo
@quadbravo 8 жыл бұрын
+Gnomefro. No it's not. There is nothing poetic about Einstein. There was nothing poetic about what I wrote. This video is a fractional hand picked list of truncated quotes. Einstein was just purely factual. He never used the term "gods" in the plural sense that you use or suggest; neither did he fail to address as it as just "God". It's also irrelevant how you individually would attempt to know God's thoughts. Einstein was not trying to know His thoughts in general, he just wanted to understand God's creation of the Universe in a mathematical way; thus Relativity and Space-Time. He wasn't seeking God in any other way.
@Nipponing
@Nipponing 8 жыл бұрын
+quadbravo Bullshit.
@1971SuperLead
@1971SuperLead 8 жыл бұрын
+quadbravo, When I was an atheist, it always bothered me that Einstein wasn't an atheist. But at least I never resorted to trying to imagine Einstein was a just being a poet when he spoke about God. lol
@MRobert2l
@MRobert2l 6 жыл бұрын
Physicists never resort to the supernatural to explaining anything. Most scientists since the 20th century never use the word 'god' in any way but as a metaphor for nature or the cosmos-- like Einstein.
@TheShinedownfan21
@TheShinedownfan21 7 жыл бұрын
The entire history of science has been a steady growth away from the supernatural toward the rational.
@nycinstyle
@nycinstyle 7 жыл бұрын
“Everything is determined, the beginning as well as the end, by forces over which we have no control. It is determined for the insect, as well as for the star. Human beings, vegetables, or cosmic dust, we all dance to a mysterious tune, intoned in the distance by an invisible piper.” - Einstein (Some type of creative force exists “”Superior Intelligence”, Old wise One”, etc. are terms Einstein used to describe this creative force (GOD). Einstein was agnostic and refused to adhere to the atheistic view throughout his life and even preferred the religious believer’s view over the atheistic view). The atheistic view: If Hawking's model is correct then the universe could be regarded as a causally closed system, uncreatable and indestrucible. Hawking: It obviously matters because if there is an edge, somebody has to decide what should happen at the edge. You would really have to invoke God. Why does that follow? Hawking: If you like, it would be a tautology. You could define God as the edge of the universe, as the agent who was responsible for setting all this in motion. Reference www.physicsforums.com/threads/hawking-on-the-edge-of-the-universe.401641/ Hawking has been trying (and failing) to prove the equations are wrong and the universe is a closed system for decades. The equations are right. There is an edge. The hypothesis should not be that there is no edge and the universe is a closed system, somehow always existent. That is the ridiculous view of a hard headed atheist. Very sad. He will die failing to prove the equations are wrong. The hypothesis should be that there is an edge a beginning of the universe's existence in a singularity and search for ways and methods to locate precisely how the universe began by outside agency. Look for signs of an outside agency. It will help us discover what this Creator is. Hawking is saying A CREATOR GOD EXISTS IF THERE IS AN EDGE. It is the logical SCIENTIFIC conclusion. He then goes on to say there is no PHYSICAL EVIDENCE EITHER WAY over whether or not there is an edge, however the equations of general relativity predict a singularity coming about at a finite moment and an edge of the universe is predicted which is backed by measuring distant galaxies moving away from us..... (a universe currently expanding AS SCIENTIFICALLY OBSERVED THROUGH TELESCOPE). So what does Hawking do and what do other atheistic scientists do? They create theories of a somehow always existent universe that have never and will never be proven. Why do you think Hawking is struggling to prove the universe is a closed system with no actual edge? If he new there was no need for a God he would just say here scientific community here is proof of a closed system. You see, we atheistic scientists had it right all along. The universe is a closed system> HE CANNOT. Live with the fact that mathematical and scientific evidence can be used to support belief in God. I stated seemingly a million times already anything God has done in the universe or to the universe after the start is based on faith. Einstein a brilliant modest man not a hard headed fool did not see the point in trying to prove there is no edge. He knew his equations spoke the truth. He also believed the universe came into existence at a finite moment ALL OF IT past present and future is here. Impossible to prove there is no edge because there is an edge, and as a result Einstein was agnostic and never once sided with the atheistic view. He in fact preferred the believer's view over the atheistic view. Have the patience for science to figure it out THEREFORE GOD. I lack belief the universe was in any way always here, and i lack belief the universe made itself. Everything I wrote is true and can backed with evidence. EVERYTHING. Check out this below youtube video. It is I believe the truth of the basic fabric of our universe, and an outside agency is needed and the logical conclusion. I happen to believe that free will has been written into the system, however the choices we will make are already known. Einstein actually went me one better in his deterministic view and believed we, like a leaf floating down stream, in reality have no say in what happens to us. It is all determined. We in actuality have NO (ZERO) choice in our actions (and even in our thoughts). The universe and time itself (which also came into existence in the singularity at a finite moment) are unfathomably complex, ..and it is all here already. Belief in a Creator GOD can be backed by evidence. A somehow always existent universe (or one that made itself) cannot. “Everything is determined, the beginning as well as the end, by forces over which we have no control. It is determined for the insect, as well as for the star. Human beings, vegetables, or cosmic dust, we all dance to a mysterious tune, intoned in the distance by an invisible piper.” kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rNihoLCgrpbbm6c.html
@benhayes7985
@benhayes7985 7 жыл бұрын
Einstein will be remembered as a positive element of world history.
@thetruth3574
@thetruth3574 6 жыл бұрын
Occam's Razor is an important scientific idea: it states that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is. "We are to admit no more causes of natural things other than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes". Isaac Newton. "Whenever possible, substitute constructions out of known entities for inferences to unknown entities". Bertrand Russell.
@moseshoward7072
@moseshoward7072 10 жыл бұрын
Einstein was a typical Jewish intellectual of the 20th century-- he believed that God is a cultural construct, not a person with a will or ego . He didn't think the fundamental forces of the universe were interfered with on the whim of any intelligent entity.
@Here0s0Johnny
@Here0s0Johnny 10 жыл бұрын
very well written (and spoken, too).
@paulbarlow9981
@paulbarlow9981 10 жыл бұрын
I concur. It sounds like Richard Dawkins is narrating, always well spoken.
@Here0s0Johnny
@Here0s0Johnny 10 жыл бұрын
Binguh Bungah why do i get the feeling that you're a theist...?
@noone.51
@noone.51 3 жыл бұрын
@@Here0s0Johnny are you still alive ??
@Alexkiplivelight
@Alexkiplivelight 8 жыл бұрын
Fantastic vids! Way to go!!
@thetruth3574
@thetruth3574 7 жыл бұрын
Just because a phenomenon has a 'beginning' doesn't mean it has to have a 'creator." A day begins at dawn, but no magical person 'creates" the day, it happens as a natural consequence of the earth's motion.
@regzzuse280
@regzzuse280 9 жыл бұрын
Einstein was spinozistic pantheist.
@BrainUser1
@BrainUser1 8 жыл бұрын
***** Yes in line with none judging moral one of buddhism, not like gnostic atheists knowing there is none, may godhaters of the likes of lucifer devotees. "What separates me from most so-called atheists is a feeling of utter humility toward the unattainable secrets of the harmony of the cosmos." (Albert Einstein to Joseph Lewis, Apr. 18, 1953)
@spiropaka9994
@spiropaka9994 3 жыл бұрын
Because he had seen no superior vision. That's kind of the limit
@lloydmckay3241
@lloydmckay3241 8 жыл бұрын
I read Bhagavad-Gita as it is. very informative on the Supreme Absolute. For any true seeker no matter what affiliation, it is a real boon. Eternally fascinating.
@jimchumley6568
@jimchumley6568 8 жыл бұрын
Who cares if such people believe in God.
@seamus9305
@seamus9305 8 жыл бұрын
Lloyd, Quakers also use the term "Seeker". Not that we have all the answers by any means, but a deep enjoyment and curiosity for the questions.
@jimchumley6568
@jimchumley6568 6 жыл бұрын
Lloyd McKay Jesus is the way, the truth and the life.
@aranyaism
@aranyaism 2 жыл бұрын
Lies. Read the Bhagwat Gita
@aspiknf
@aspiknf 10 ай бұрын
The Bhagavad Gita is very good.
@RajeshKumar-du5hy
@RajeshKumar-du5hy 6 жыл бұрын
Wise men know all the truth. The church men will never know it.
@ivorfaulkner4768
@ivorfaulkner4768 6 жыл бұрын
“Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point”( Pascal)
@christiandavidxx
@christiandavidxx 7 жыл бұрын
how hard is it for conscious 'beings' to realize that the universe is one Being; an infinite and intelligent consciousness?
@isaiahvasquez3792
@isaiahvasquez3792 4 жыл бұрын
because we are so vastly small in comparison to the sheer ever expanding magnitude of the universe and therefore people such as scientist are innately curious about everything around them so that they imagine that everything around them has a functioning purpose of a systematic nature.
@ramanchaudhary2518
@ramanchaudhary2518 3 жыл бұрын
Consciousness would require a sort of computing structure where there are “transistors” for example a neutron and a transitory work in the same way on or of, 1 or 0 The universe doesn’t work in that way it doesn’t have any “transistors”
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 3 жыл бұрын
In what way is the universe "intelligent" when it has no sense of personal self or individual identity? Only animals like us can be said to have "intelligence," it is a tool we use to solve problems-- but the universe has no problems and isn't trying to solve anything. It's just happening. Any awareness it has is merely a quality of the organisms that grow out of it, each with their own goals and points of view. There is no centralized "boss" in control of everything, only a lot of separate expressions of selfhood, each reflecting and reacting to all the others. Taken together they are a kind of consciousness, but not one with plans or intentions to acheive any particular outcome.
@bkit5
@bkit5 7 жыл бұрын
He believes not in a personal god but and orderly harmony of what exist. That means he still believes in god but his perspective is of god is different. Stop trying to prove he didn't believe in god1
@bkit5
@bkit5 7 жыл бұрын
***** Nature is god...
@bkit5
@bkit5 7 жыл бұрын
***** No it means scientist barely know shit. Believing in god does not meant you have to believe in religion. God is something no one understands but you know for a fact that someone or something must have designed all that you see in the sky,
@bkit5
@bkit5 7 жыл бұрын
***** I didn't get it. You either acknowledge that he or she or it exist or don't. Its simple do you believe that everything is just a coincidence or that there is a reason for everything and there is someone who is pulling the strings making things happen. That all.
@bkit5
@bkit5 7 жыл бұрын
***** I m not denying luck, I am just saying that there is a reason why someone or some planet is lucky. Spirituality gives a reason why the universe is unfair not saying it is fair. Don't mistake spirituality to following religion. Religion is following rules, opinions and stories written by someone. Spirituality is discovering your soul, the brain is a computer it gives you information but its you the soul that makes the decision. If it is only the brain that differentiates a person who obeys the law from a drug dealer or robber then why do punish the criminal. We just have to accept them because their brains are different.
@MrTrackman100
@MrTrackman100 7 жыл бұрын
No personal god means exactly that---NO god! (Believing in cosmic harmony or nature does not make one a theist. Accept that Einstein was an atheist.
@chuyocaca4153
@chuyocaca4153 Жыл бұрын
" all it takes to see there is purpose in the reality of a higher perfect being is perseverance in faith"
@amongussus4
@amongussus4 Жыл бұрын
Find purpose in self not in the unknown
@roninrecon
@roninrecon 8 жыл бұрын
What you believe is true FOR YOU, because you believe it. Also what you don't believe is true FOR YOU because you believe you don't believe it.
@abdullahomar8528
@abdullahomar8528 8 жыл бұрын
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
@mdcorreia
@mdcorreia 8 жыл бұрын
SCIENCE DOES EXTREMELY WELL WITHOUT RELIGION!!!!
@abdullahomar8528
@abdullahomar8528 8 жыл бұрын
Both my friend, no religion'll just live animals for food and sex without our end goal would be to commit suicide
@pauluspauli5774
@pauluspauli5774 8 жыл бұрын
That is the opinion of believers not of scientists. Look who said it.
@MRobert2l
@MRobert2l 6 жыл бұрын
Religion often looks to borrow an unearned credibility from science, but science never seeks to justify itself with religion-- science stands on its own merits.
@tiffanyomega5435
@tiffanyomega5435 5 жыл бұрын
Science exists, Religion exists in belief, God neither exists nor doesn’t anywhere but in belief.. bottom line is this.. Be good to each other, or your considered evil will punish you. Jesus was a control freak who got sick of being ripped off so separated good from evil and left that belief to fester and grow through eternity
@pamepame3475
@pamepame3475 8 жыл бұрын
To believe in a god you must switch your brain. Believe functions best without thinking.
@LucisFerre1
@LucisFerre1 8 жыл бұрын
Faith is mind-poison because it's about obstantly believing what one wishes to believe (i.e. wishful thinking) rather than being about what is believed. That is, it's about the stubborness of the believer and not about the vercity of what is believed. Some people believe true things, others false things, and others patently stupid, ridiculous things. To think it's a virtue to stubbornly continue to believe ideas regardless of the facts or lack thereof, is stupidity incarnate.
@izyeboid6008
@izyeboid6008 8 жыл бұрын
+LucisFerre1 Let's say you have a large room. It's fully enclosed and is about the size of a football field. The room is locked, permanently, and has no doors or windows, and no holes in its walls. Inside the room there is...nothing. Absolutely nothing. Not a particle of anything. No air at all. No dust at all. No light at all. It's a sealed room that's pitch black inside. Then what happens? Well, let's say your goal is to get something -- anything at all -- into the room. But the rules are: you can't use anything from outside the room to do that. So what do you do? Well, you think, what if I try to create a spark inside the room? Then the room would have light in it, even for just a moment. That would qualify as something. Yes, but you are outside the room. So that's not allowed. But, you say, what if I could teleport something into the room, like in Star Trek? Again, that's not allowable, because you'd be using things from outside the room. Here again is the dilemma: you have to get something inside the room using only what's in the room. And, in this case, what's in the room is nothing. Well, you say, maybe a tiny particle of something will just show up inside the room if given enough time. There's three problems with this theory. First, time by itself doesn't do anything. Things happen over time, but it's not time that makes them happen. For example, if you wait 15 minutes for cookies to bake, it's not the 15 minutes that bakes them, it's the heat in the oven. If you set them on the counter for 15 minutes, they're not going to bake. In our analogy, we've got a fully enclosed room with absolutely nothing in it. Waiting 15 minutes will not, in and of itself, change the situation. Well, you say, what if we wait eons? An eon is merely a bunch of 15-minute segments all pressed together. If you waited an eon with your cookies on the counter, would the eon bake them? The second problem is this: why would anything just "show up" in the empty room? It would need a reason why it came to be. But there is nothing inside the room at all. So what's to stop that from remaining the case? There would be nothing inside the room to cause something to show up (and yet the reason must come from inside the room). Well, you say, what about a tiny particle of something? Wouldn't that have a greater chance of materializing in the room than something larger like, for example, a football? That brings up the third problem: size. Like time, size is an abstract. It's relative. Let's say you have three baseballs, all ranging in size. One is ten feet wide, one is five feet wide, one is normal size. Which one is more likely to materialize in the room? The normal-size baseball? No! It would be the same likelihood for all three. The size wouldn't matter. It's not the issue. The issue is whether or not any baseball of any size could just "show up" in our sealed, empty room. If you don't think the smallest baseball could just show up in the room, no matter how much time passed, then you must conclude the same thing even for an atom. Size is not an issue. The likelihood of a small particle materializing without cause is no different than a refrigerator materializing without cause! Now let's stretch our analogy further, literally. Let's take our large, pitch-black room and remove its walls. And let's extend the room so that it goes on infinitely in all directions. Now there is nothing outside the room, because the room is all there is. Period. This black infinite room has no light, no dust, no particles of any kind, no air, no elements, no molecules. It's absolute nothingness. In fact, we can call it Absolutely Nothing. So here's the question: if originally -- bazillions of years ago -- there was Absolutely Nothing, wouldn't there be Absolutely Nothing now? Yes. For something -- no matter how small -- cannot come from Absolutely Nothing. We would still have Absolutely Nothing. What does that tell us? That Absolutely Nothing never existed. Why? Because, if Absolutely Nothing ever existed, there would still be Absolutely Nothing! If Absolutely Nothing ever existed, there would not be anything outside it to cause the existence of anything. Again, if Absolutely Nothing ever existed, there would still be Absolutely Nothing. However, something exists. Actually, many things exist. You, for example, are something that exists, a very important something. Therefore, you are proof that Absolutely Nothing never existed. Now, if Absolutely Nothing never existed, that means there was always a time when there was at least Something in existence. What was it? Was it one thing or many things? Was it an atom? A particle? A molecule? A football? A mutant baseball? A refrigerator? Some cookies?
@LucisFerre1
@LucisFerre1 8 жыл бұрын
Slime GamingYT The reason your analogy is not-apt is because not only did energy (matter came later) have an origin, but so did time AND space. There was no "empty room", as space itself had an origin. Secondly, there is no such thing as an existent nothing. Nothing cannot exist, because 'nothing' is the opposite of existence. Third, there was no 'before' time or a place before space. The "nothing and then something" analogy is, to be frank, false. Another point. The net energy of the universe is zero. The net monentum of the universe is zero, which makes conservation laws of energy and momentum compatible with a spontaniously occuring universe. AND, the geometry of the universe is flat within 1%. This is not controversial news, which, again, suggests a spontaniously occuring universe. You should look up what Hawking says about a flat universe, and the no-boundries condition of time and space.
@aliraza-ls2xv
@aliraza-ls2xv 8 жыл бұрын
+LucisFerre1 u bend the law of conservation to support ur idea.... law clearly states that energy can neither be created nor be destroyed but can only change forms .... ..in the light of this there got be something present that changed its state .... we also know that nothing can change its state on its own , still require something or anything to force or provide such conditions to change its state.... this law itself proves the presence of God.
@LucisFerre1
@LucisFerre1 8 жыл бұрын
ali raza Energy is created and destroyed all the time. That's not what the conservation of energy is about. The law of conservation of energy is about the total sum of energy of the universe remaining a constant. And it makes no sense to talk about states of matter or energy changing without cause when the subject is the origin of time and space, since "cause" in such a case would literally make no sense. There can't be a cause for the origin of time or space because that cause or Causer would need to pre-exist both time and space...which is gibberish.
@hjalmar.poelzig
@hjalmar.poelzig 6 жыл бұрын
Einstein believed in the pantheistic God of Spinoza. He did not believe in a personal God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings, a view which he described as naïve. Einstein called himself an "agnostic" and a "religious nonbeliever." When asked if he believed in life after death, Einstein replied, "No. And one life is enough for me."
@danielwoodwardcomposer2040
@danielwoodwardcomposer2040 8 жыл бұрын
To dracumelenios:- The problem with believing that Beethoven was a great composer is that it does not have to be grounded in facts and so it is like a compass which does not have to point to the North but could be pointing at any direction.
@clydecantuba123
@clydecantuba123 8 жыл бұрын
I agreed who said that god is a faith not a knowledge.... bravo :)
@randy109
@randy109 9 жыл бұрын
My favorite Einstein quote regarding god and religion. He believed in a "Creator", NOT a personal God like that of Christianity or Islam... "In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views." "I'm not an atheist and I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangements of the books, but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God."
@robertm6079
@robertm6079 8 жыл бұрын
amazing Emmanuel
@jeffrey6244
@jeffrey6244 8 жыл бұрын
Is that Lalla Ward narrating along with her husband?
@keandrejones7040
@keandrejones7040 9 жыл бұрын
Basically he dosent believe in that god that's people feel fearful/separate/worship by people
@mandkhuli5775
@mandkhuli5775 8 жыл бұрын
+KeAndre Jones whats your point
@zynjofaze5059
@zynjofaze5059 7 жыл бұрын
Is it Richard Dawkins narrating?
@bkit5
@bkit5 7 жыл бұрын
yes of course he has been trying to convince everyone that Einstein is an atheist for a long time now. To make himself feel better cause Einstein didn't believed in god. He didn't believe in religion though.
@dracumelenios
@dracumelenios 7 жыл бұрын
Dawkins never claimed Einstein for an atheist. Watch it again, Dawkins clearly states that Einstein was a Deist in this very video.
@bkit5
@bkit5 7 жыл бұрын
dracumelenios Yes he is deist but in the same video listen carefully and you will here the lady voice claiming him to be an atheistic scientist. watch other videos of his like the one with him fighting with deepak chopra.
@dracumelenios
@dracumelenios 7 жыл бұрын
of course he was an atheistic scientist! See, science hasn't discovered real gods to exist yet, so currently all scientists are compelled to leave gods out their scientific work. Still, it does not mean that they can't have a religious affiliation in their private lives, it just means they have to leave gods at the door when doing science.
@darthbane2669
@darthbane2669 7 жыл бұрын
There is only one God. To have more than one would mean they are flawed and not powerful enough.
@samLsmith-zw6jt
@samLsmith-zw6jt 7 жыл бұрын
Every once in awhile declare peace. It leads your enemy to utter confusion.(76)
@aktifistri
@aktifistri 8 жыл бұрын
5.01 - 5.40 really helps me out in my journey of finding 'God', and my confusion on 'scientist popular terms on God'. So, 1 piece (of my spiritual journey) is found. Feels good. Thanks for sharing the awesome video! Namaste.
@choward5430
@choward5430 8 жыл бұрын
Mr. Einstein knew the answer the moment he left his body on April 18, 1955.
@choward5430
@choward5430 8 жыл бұрын
your word not mine
@choward5430
@choward5430 8 жыл бұрын
Go 'head then!
@piesho
@piesho 8 жыл бұрын
+C Howard So, what was the answer?
@choward5430
@choward5430 8 жыл бұрын
Sir, I have no earthly idea what you are trying to convey here. So do me a favor. Talk "real" talk please.
@gerggbergr8976
@gerggbergr8976 8 жыл бұрын
+Tim H muggins!
@mahoya1232
@mahoya1232 5 жыл бұрын
Dawkins may have a good memory to store information but honestly he is not smart. He is naive when comes to philosophy
@BrainUser1
@BrainUser1 3 жыл бұрын
And Einstein is what he looks like: a clown. Always ran away from debates.
@vibgyor9239
@vibgyor9239 3 жыл бұрын
He was logical person for any type of field...not "naive"..!!
@guacamoleniqqapeniss7317
@guacamoleniqqapeniss7317 3 жыл бұрын
He did not show up to WILLIAM LANE A CRAIG's.
@poozer1986
@poozer1986 3 жыл бұрын
@@guacamoleniqqapeniss7317 just at you probably would show up to a debate with someone who believes they're a fried egg
@hamishincrieff
@hamishincrieff 8 жыл бұрын
Richard sounds like he is about to tell us a story about the soup dragon.
@hughjenkins8742
@hughjenkins8742 7 жыл бұрын
Religion is all about ME, ME, ME whereas science is about everything that surrounds me.
@aprillynn5295
@aprillynn5295 6 жыл бұрын
I don't care what anyone says, I love God and respect him.
@queenstixxzz
@queenstixxzz 2 жыл бұрын
@richardmcmillan4708
@richardmcmillan4708 8 жыл бұрын
ITs Christmas day 2015 , Thank Evolution for gravity and the invention of the English language
@mikemower1939
@mikemower1939 8 жыл бұрын
On Christmas you thanked tadpoles that crawled from the ocean millions of years ago?
@olafseverin1135
@olafseverin1135 8 жыл бұрын
+Richard McMillan worship "her"? Well, u seemingly do´nt know much of the issue, so u cannot explain the cellular processes within even the most simple microbe. There r some lies on self-creation of genome plus receptors the same time. It simple does´nt work at all. Organic materials r not able to build functional cells. There MUST be inteligence added, otherwise life does´nt come into existence.
@olafseverin1135
@olafseverin1135 8 жыл бұрын
+Richard McMillan +Richard McMillan worship "her"? Well, u seemingly do´nt know much of the issue, so u cannot explain the cellular processes within even the most simple microbe. There r some lies on self-creation of genome plus receptors the same time. It simple does´nt work at all. Organic materials r not able to build functional cells. There MUST be inteligence added, otherwise life does´nt come into existence.
@jesusbermudez6775
@jesusbermudez6775 Ай бұрын
I believe in God because it wrote my spiritual story A naïve soft hearted man who lived in a wealthy city and spent all his time helping people distanced himself to a mountainous land. On the way there he kept helping people. He then fell ill and these thoughts came to him: what will I do afterwards? I will go to the top of the mountain and let the vultures eat me; I want no riches of this world; I am coming to help my father; and I can work. He then goes back to the wealthy city and miraculously finds work. He then understands the vultures are the people he attracted and he did not know he was attracting because he was naïve; he wants no riches of this world because he has the virtues of this world; he helps his father die with out suffering in his old age, and he works.
@nug7894
@nug7894 8 жыл бұрын
did dawkins narrate this?
@nug7894
@nug7894 8 жыл бұрын
+nugraha steven he did watch until the end
@rccrashburn
@rccrashburn 7 жыл бұрын
Narrated by Richard Dawkins????
@dracumelenios
@dracumelenios 7 жыл бұрын
yep
@hasch5756
@hasch5756 7 жыл бұрын
I think it's from his book The God Delusion.
@afonsosilvestre8330
@afonsosilvestre8330 6 жыл бұрын
yeah that was when I knew this was gonna be atheist brainwash.
@romeomajnu8359
@romeomajnu8359 6 жыл бұрын
I agree with Einstein......
@gamingboi2710
@gamingboi2710 6 жыл бұрын
Continue this conversation l am 10 my mother always said read she read to me and sang
@waedjradi
@waedjradi 3 жыл бұрын
Admirable.
@rolobeorn1881
@rolobeorn1881 8 жыл бұрын
People should understand Einstein believed in Spinoza God because of his scientific knowledge. Our scientific knowledge evolves so the idea of God also evolves. Spinoza God is imo a fancy word for the God of the gaps. Most gods started as gods of gaps. There are less and less gaps in science so the idea of a God wil slowely evolve out. He did not believe in a personal God, like the christian God. He ridiculed it. That's what he said about the bible: "the word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish."
@rolobeorn1881
@rolobeorn1881 8 жыл бұрын
+mentalphysicalism What's very interesting is that they (Spinoza and Einstein) did not belief in anything extra. Spinozism is not a religion, it's a philosophy. Einstein was an agnostic atheist. The fact that Einstein did not consider himself to be an atheist, was an idea that was based on semantics.
@rolobeorn1881
@rolobeorn1881 8 жыл бұрын
***** Pantheists call everything to be god, they don't believe in anything extra. They call things we already know that exist to be god. A pantheistic god is not a being.
@rolobeorn1881
@rolobeorn1881 8 жыл бұрын
***** Deists, pantheists, agnostics, atheists... they believe basically in the same thing. They look like different beliefs but that's based on semantics and not a real belief. for example: -A deist believes an impersonal god created the universe. Yet they don't know what the impersonal god is or how it created the universe...that's an agnostic point of view. Calling the cause for the universe to be god, does not change your belief, it changes the name of your belief.
@GUALLACOL
@GUALLACOL 8 жыл бұрын
+Rolo Beorn Wrong! A Diest - A person that believes in God but does not subscribe to the method of religion.
@rolobeorn1881
@rolobeorn1881 8 жыл бұрын
GUALLACOL That's true but I'm not wrong. A deist believes a transcendent force, you can call god, created the universe. But since the creation he does not interveen in anything.
@dianeross4522
@dianeross4522 8 жыл бұрын
Einstein is human. Humans are not ALL knowing.
@morganharris3183
@morganharris3183 7 жыл бұрын
I thought that the on god part of the title was the song
@fhiggenbottom
@fhiggenbottom 6 жыл бұрын
“Agnostic” defined: Any person who holds the view that ultimate knowledge or reality (concerning God) is unknown and probably unknowable; broadly: one who isn’t committed to a belief in either the existence or the nonexistence of God. Perhaps that best describes the view of Einstein.
@garypotter5569
@garypotter5569 3 жыл бұрын
The only honest atheist is the one who admits he doesn't know -- i.e. an agnostic.
@eppingmelb
@eppingmelb 8 жыл бұрын
The road to everlasting life in heaven is narrow and very few will find it. But the road that leads to everlasting destruction (hell) is wide and many will enter in by it. What road will you take? Will you seek Jesus with all your heart? Or end with the demons forever in hell. Don't believe? Are you really willing to take a chance? "ITS FOREVER"
@pauluspauli5774
@pauluspauli5774 8 жыл бұрын
Look up The empty cross in youtube and Bible unearthed. It might give the insight that religions are big lies. Are you really such weak and bad person that you need a religion to tell you what is good and what is bad?
@AndreasLuedicke
@AndreasLuedicke 8 жыл бұрын
Why do you mention Religion? Jesus opposed religion... and was killed by it also. thelastreformation.com/ will help your understanding. No one is perfect
Dr Michael Shermer | God does NOT exist
16:04
OxfordUnion
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
когда достали одноклассники!
00:49
БРУНО
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
Pokey pokey 🤣🥰❤️ #demariki
00:26
Demariki
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
What is Spinoza's God?
19:36
Let's Talk Religion
Рет қаралды 591 М.
Inside the genius of Albert Einstein | Big Think
11:17
Big Think
Рет қаралды 184 М.
Stephen Hawking view on God | Science vs God
10:59
Klonusk
Рет қаралды 60 М.
когда достали одноклассники!
00:49
БРУНО
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН