That's what made God God

The physics of the universe determine our behavior, including the persistent illusion that we have free will.

@TheShinedownfan21 Yes. According to the suggested hypothesis, our mind can be illusion and have no 'free will', which I have no problem understanding. However, my real question is where does 'rationality' thereby come into play as nobody is actively engaging in purposeful discussions but cause-effects of physical properties. I still do feel like what we access and achieve as human beings are purposeful in many ways. The fact that you are putting that comment to perhaps 'convince others' is because you trust your own rationality and believe that you can access the truth. But in what basis do we trust our own when all of these are byproducts of determined chain reactions of Bigbang?

also, there isn't much absence of evidence, as Eucharists have turned into heart tissue and AB type blood quite a few times.

Than why doesnt he make the future good so people dont starve and have pointless wars, if he is the creater? Also why is the earth not in the center of everything since that is his most talked about creation?

​@@denice.a3620He will. Read Revelation

@@denice.a3620Because people have free will they can do good or bad things. But there's a limit to what will by law and morality of human minds. Second to your question. Our world is not defined as the only being in this universe. We are just mirrors of different planes of existence.

@@youraveragejoe6470 people have free will to do bad and good? What is bad and what is good everyone has a different view on that so on what is that based. does it count for babies as well?? And for the mirrors of different places it is not explained that does exist in the book

@@youraveragejoe6470 plus that doesnt explain it still he could have made us so we would not do bad. We are "his" creations after all you guys say, so he created the bad in us he made a mistake in making us than.

You're ignoring the arguably more bleak probability that a planet has all of the prerequisites to sustain life, not just long enough to support basic microbial life, but for the planet to harbor life long enough for evolution to reach a point where a species becomes sentient. That said, that's a horrendously bad reason for saying there has to be a God. I also never understood how people can tell themselves that the belief in a creator is somehow a more simple, elegant belief than a simply spontaneous universe because, were it true, it creates a host of new questions to be answered.

@@ESFoxwell I’ve come to the conclusion that God is more of some kind of inherent law, or unmade structure, from which all things arise. And it just so happens to be that such a structure / law is capable of producing intent. If natural laws created order from chaos, and humanity, who have intent, how much harder is it to believe a supernatural law, the fundamental law, from which physical reality projects, could produce order and intent? And if it is indeed true, then why not explore it? Tell me the last time we learned something new about the truth and had less questions because of it. You will find such thinking is a property of a dogmatic / religious mentality!

@@ESFoxwell The universe may not be full of intent, that is until you look at life itself. If astronauts were to discover a pile of rocks on the moon vaguely representing the message “HELLO HUMANS,” they could assume such a message was either left there randomly or intentionally. Indeed, the odds of rocks from a nearby volcano landing in that particular arrangement (assuming they are within a 5x46 grid, yielding an odds of about 1/2^(5x46)=1.8E-69 chance) which is still about 3.7E171 times more likely to occur than a single RNA gene arising spontaneously. Just because an ordered design is “naturally occurring” and microscopic does not make an unintentional, or causal, process an appealing solution. What I’m saying is, if you found that message on the moon, what would you believe? Are you in the “natural causes” camp? Not just any arrangement will do.

Unless life is abundent all over the universe. It might start quite easily under the right conditions.

Your lack of evolutionary knowledge is astounding

What is the sense brother...here there is not such a thing for believing in god by these occurred event😂😂you have gone through a spiritual person so what happened??you will start to believe in the existence of god😂😂......DAMN BROTHER 🙏

Read the book 📖 of genesis

Agreed. Although according to some religions the bibles are supposed to be god-made… (or god inspired) There is a little to no chance that any bible on earth is actually real. I am christian, but i still believe that my religion probably isn’t true (it is a 1 in almost a billion chance considering how many religions there are) It is simply the religion i have the *most* faith in, but this statement seems the most-likely. Well put. 👍

yeah that's what seems most reasonable for me. There's too many human made god(s) and goddesses etc and there's literally a 0% chance a real god is accurately described by any of them. But it doesn't mean there isn't some form of a god or gods.

I respectfully disagree. While I look at certain religions, such as Islam, I see an obvious pyramid scheme that got Mohammed quite rich. I don't see that with early Christianity, which implies there could be something to it. People die for false beliefs because they genuinely believe in them, or at the very least had a very good material gain to get out of it. The early Christians would've known if it was for real or not yet died for their faith and had no real hope of material gain to really justify it. They could've been crazy, but that wouldn't explain how admittedly well the New Testemant was put together, shared delusions or just weird factors like Saul of Taursus converting and the early Christians at the same time not immediately stoning him. If there is a God, at least one that cared about humans, I would think he would've made an attempt to communicate with us, so, really, I think it's quite likely one of the major religions would have the moral answers to everything.

Proof that it is false? (I'm Muslim so don't say the bible is false because I already know that)

Click bait.

7:20 "He (Hawking) concluded that God would not have had time..."

that's what's unfortunate about religions ... there is also some bad. the terrifying thing here is bad can varies .. from simple .. to absolutely catastrophic .

@@cgiguyWell, people will believe what they believe.

The question assumes that there was a place for it to come from. And that problem is infinite because even if you had an answer, the question remains. It's not a question of why or how it simply is.

Your life is the most miracle God ever did, much more than the creation of the universe

@@Gustavocalifornia101 what a ridiculous statement. no equivalency there

@@petermartell568 do you really think that the whole universe, stars, planets, black holes, the dimensions like space and time, the laws os physics like gravity and the quantum world, the humans being and life itself, came all by chance? All of this matchs perfectly in a structure that even can be described in the mathematics. Are you such ignorant to not aknowlodge The God as the creator?

@@Gustavocalifornia101 No I do not think that everything came by chance. I see how natural forces and changing conditions caused these things. Chemical interactions ambient temperature fluctuations, physical forces such as gravity causing ecretions to form stars and planets, evolutionary patterns driven by natural/sexual selection, mutations, epigenetics, etc, over long periods of time. I do not believe in a conscious, compassionate all-powerful, spaceless eternal hidden sky fairy had anything to do with anything. Fortunately, I do not have your level of gullibility to believe such an absurdity. Sad that you do. And mathematics is the discovery of man recognizing patterns

@@Gustavocalifornia101 some people think they are being smart and progressive by saying God is not real… No matter how you try to explain the universe, there still has to be a cause.. And the structure of the universe show sings of a highly intelligent structure despite entropy.

Do you think nothing exists outside of science?

@@SaltyTubeSock Yes

@@SaltyTubeSockthere likely are some alternative dimensions or universes out there where some act of nature we can’t explain yet through science caused our universe to appear. A sky wizard philosopher who’s completely all powerful creating the universe is ridiculous and illogical. The Bible is moral philosophy, nothing more

Yes there seems to be something innate in humans since the beginning of time to believe in this delusion

Guys, just let people believe what they believe and don’t harass them for it. They wont hurt you. 😊

@@mario_fan-qq4hq But many do harass atheists for their beliefs, just check this comment section.

@@somethingelse9228 I mean don’t harass ANYONE for their beliefs. I am an atheist.

Is there even a goal?

Sike, why can't humans make a nonliving thing into a living thing(consciousness, also explain)? If we can't even make a nonliving thing turn to a living thing with all of our knowledge, why trust nonintelligent processes to suddenly make DNA which is at least 3.2 billion thingamajigs long without a conscious mind to decide and guide it in the first place? Also, we can talk about the moral argument if you want.

Also, God is not a sky-god you atheists assume to believe lol, God is MORE than that. First of all, He exists outside the Universe and sustains everything.

@@user-qui91pvsw which god(s) specifically are u talking about? also we are doing that with AI

That’s the thing though, being in this earth isn’t about self. Because if it’s about self, that’s exactly how you wind up with people using God(of any religion) to justify their own personal desires even if if it’s wrong

Where his parts come from???

All your questions will be answered eventually. I'm sure there will not be any god needed in those equations.

we don't exist for nothing is all we need to understand....

@@millepill typical refuting response.

@@shaoorehsan9114 Well, so far there hasn't been a need for a god to answer any scientific question. In the natural sciences, one always continues to ask questions and further increase knowledge continuously. Eventually we will get answers to all scientific questions like how the universe came into being, how it will end, what fundamental particles exist, how all forces including gravity work and how life started. It is surprising that religious people think they have answers to everything by reading a book that was written in a time when we had no idea about physics like today.

@@jeffriesj75 There is no other meaning to life than to live it. We humans look for reasons for everything. I feel sorry for people who cannot find their own meaning in life. We are insignificant in and to the universe. All that exists is cause and effect; biological, chemical or physical.

However. The Vatican Does have a telescope/observatory. It's called "The Vatican Telescope"... ?

The physics stinks, too

​@@davidkurz2977coz you can't understand it

YAH!! BUT CAPTION IS ALL WAY CORRECT!!

@@davidkurz2977 may be it is because physics is not your cup of coffee

false. Belief in any god is illogical. No proof or evidence for any of them. Also false...you don't know if there's a starting point for everything. Thts an assertion you've made with no proof or evidence of being true. The universe could be very well infinite...you or I don't know tht. This guy in the video saying before the big bang there was nothing isn't even scientific. Science doesn't even say there was "nothing". How can something be created from "nothing", when no one can explain what "nothing" is

Well said 👍

tht shit is not well said...lol...its a bunch of bs tht christians want to believe, but its nonsense@@mario_fan-qq4hq

Nothing by definition doesn't come from anywhere.

Elon

Rubber Dinghy Rapids, bro.

Everyone has a flawed philosophy to some degree or another.

@@freznelite Absolutely agree. Hawking's 'flawed' philosophy - being an eminent figure - had added fuel to atheistic movement to a 'greater' degree. "They professed to be wise but they are nothing but fools!"

If you are a "Who" and not a "What," then why would you think your origin would not be from a Who???

@@maskofsorrow I am a 'Who' because my parents were 'Whos". That does not say anything about a supposed creator of the universe.

@@chaschoune And just who was the original parents??? That says everything about the Creator.

@@maskofsorrow there's a theory that the universe came from a long line of deaths and rebirths, expanding and shrinking based on the balance of natural forces. it's possible that it's creation was produced by itself and not an otherworldly force

@@victortang5076 And what started it in the first place? ie. What birthed it originally? Where did its consciousness and intelligence come from?

Hawkings wasnt that intelligent to take on his word, he was just a glorified scientist because of his disability, awesome work due to dedicated time to his work and the UK culture that tend to always glorify people which is not bad thing. Also he probably hated the idea of god because of his illness. I like Christopher Langan's work better.

I kind of doubt he's conversing with our Creator. More like he's conversing with Satan.

I wouldn't go to a theologian for "information" about ANYTHING. Google "faith"

​@@davidkurz2977 By faith, Google is the authoritative epistemology.

Theologians are about as useful as master Minecraft speed runners. Sure, it's cool to some people, but ultimately irrelevant information. Physics actually explain the world around us, it's not just some form of entertainment.

@@ESFoxwell Physics explains the structures and laws of matter but it cannot help you discover why you should not commit suicide.

@@polemeros is that an argument that religion prevents suicide? I'd be very interested in you quantifying that belief.

you mean the christian god? islam? hindu? how about the norse gods? zues perhaps? You have not seen all the evidence and yet you already conclude that a single all powerful being exist.

"it is more than obvious" is one of the worse evidence you can have.

​@@chaschoune You cannot evolve even a single gene randomly from scratch. Do the math. The creation of life, and the evolution of life, is either guided or obeys some other law which eliminates almost all of the randomness. Life evolves over time, and we witness this progression, but I am telling you, there is not enough time nor material in this Universe to evolve one new gene randomly.

@@freznelite Nobody said that a single gene can randomly evolve from scratch. Millions of years is an incommensurate amount of time and your incredulity is not an argument.

​@@chaschoune So you are agreeing the formation of life is not random? If so, then I would encourage you to accept the following facts: 1. Life itself requires a Design File, which is executed in the form of genetic code. 2. The Design File for the theoretical minimum viable organism is roughly 250 genes, averaging 1000 base pairs each. 3. The Design File did not happen by chance (i.e. as the result of a purely random process). How do you propose such a large Design File could have arisen? Show me which mathematical / chemical / physical / biological law, that creates such a design file from scratch, and I will believe it could have happened through natural processes in this world alone. A complex design file implies Intent. Intent implies Intelligence. Intelligence implies a lot of things. Show me how a complex design file does not require intent. And if you still think time is the explanation, let me tell you, 100 trillion years is not enough time for a trillion trillion organisms each with a genome the size of an ocean to evolve even one brand new gene purely randomly. Let us calculate the probability of doing so. One of the simplest viral RNA sequences is only 400 base pairs long (and represents a very poor ribosomal molecule). Let's say this is all you need to build one new functional gene. Let there be a trillion trillion genomes, each of which contain a genetic code that weighs as much as the Earth's ocean (1.4E24 kg ocean, 110 DA per amino acid, yielding 7.7E45 amino acids per genome). Let the entire sequence of these amino acids be combined into a single chain, giving the highest possibility of forming at least one correct sequence in each chain. Let these massive organisms randomly recombine their sequence of amino acids at a rate of a million times per second for 100 trillion years (until the last star dies). You are left with approximately 7.7E89 total combinations across this period. Now, let us set up the odds of assembling one new, correct sequence. The odds that an event occurs can be approximated as one minus the odds the event does not occur after a given number of trials. Let the probability that we get at least one sequence of these particular 400 base pairs in this situation be: P = 1 - (1 - 1/(4^400)) ^ 7.7E89. Compute this formula in Wolfram Alpha to see what the odds are of randomly evolving one new gene from a trillion trillion ocean-sized genomes after 100 trillion years. The best example we have of evolution is viral. Viruses steal genetic code from their hosts. Sometimes they create new genes in a semi-random fashion through recombination of existing code, copy defects, and even radiation defects. But they are not building entirely new genes from scratch (i.e. a brand new 400 base pair gene) without pulling this from their host's genetic code. So they are able to adopt genetic code, and evolve by attacking their hosts, but they are not able to synthesize a purely random new gene.

What are the odds of assembling the Big Ben Bell Tower from an ocean of Legos shaken back and forth a trillion trillion times? Effectively zero.

According to Christianity there is no difference between a non-believer and someone who believes in some other God, both are going to hell. From that perspective, how is it better to choose to believe? The reality is that religious people are really not all that different from us non-believers. We can sit down and agree that thousands of Gods aren't real, it's only one that most people on the planet would disagree with me on. Also, there's a lot of irony in your phone analogy. Religion quite clearly has the fingerprints of humanity, created by us for us. We live on one planet, in one solar system, in one galaxy, in a universe so vast we can't fully grasp it, and yet we still find ways to tell ourselves we're at the center of it. How foolish.

​@@ESFoxwell We know almost nothing, Foxwell. It is equally foolish to say there is nothing to spiritual truth, as it is to reduce the breadth of reality to a narrow religious philosophy. Since you are in the non-religious mindset. Let's say for one moment that there actually was something out there with sovereignty - and the way that force works is very strange. Would you be willing to search for it yourself? If you go looking, you will find out there is something working among men. What it is I cannot tell you. But I see it, and have experienced it, in a way that creates good (despite the odds in favor of chaos). And you won't know it unless you actually want to. So I encourage you to explore, use your brain, your heart, and think. Test it for yourself and see what happens. What is the worst that could happen to you? That you would learn nothing in the process.

@@freznelite ​ I'm all for searching for spiritual truths, I just expect the same standards as any other claim. Make a hypothesis based on your observations, test that hypothesis, and examine the results. "Feelings" and "personal experiences" open a Pandora's box of charlatans. We have to rely on what we can observe AND authenticate. People of the religious mindset struggle with that second part, in my personal experience.

​@@ESFoxwell What you are saying is correct. I also desire to be an "objective" witness to clear and unquestionable events. Unfortunately, there is no single test you can apply for any spiritual concept. There isn't one test that proves there is a God without a shadow of a doubt, or that He knows you, or even cares. But it seems to me that spiritual truth is something that is revealed personally, rarely being objectively true to others (but you can know it is true within yourself). If you are dealing with an intelligence greater than yourself, which has something for your life, then it is expedient that you respond, and it is expedient that you ask something from it. If you could ask for anything from such an intelligence, what would it be? Just try doing so consistently for a few years. Perhaps even less. Whatever happens, make of it as you wish, you will think of it as a tremendous blessing or a great curse. Herein lies the power of choice. Many things you cannot choose to happen, so you will ride as a willing participant or a stubborn objector. I have been both in my life. Could it be that the way we choose to interpret our experiences makes us irredeemably blind to objective reality? Yes, such is the nature of human consciousness. Yet I can tell you, in good conscience, something invisible has protected me (even physically), guided me, showed me things that I otherwise would not have known. This is more along the lines of spiritual experience rather than a purely physical operation. One could argue it was all just coincidence, but I have to admit these kind of things happen too often and they tie together, creating new understanding and appreciation... almost like a "somebody" planned it that way. My plans have been foiled, and to my great surprise they have been replaced with something better. For me to not have faith after those experiences would be illogical. And I cannot convince you of my experiences even if I tried! It is not on a tape recorder. And it is not by men or by our own reasoning we will arrive at this understanding, but by a gift. May we prepare ourselves to receive that gift! This is very different than the scientific process. But somehow no less valid for the individual. So to our friends who are doggedly religious, perhaps they ought to be shaken up, and honestly start looking for what is real. And for those who insist on manifestation, may that which is greater than us release the cords of doubt that bind, and may we honestly start looking for what is real in life. I challenge you to try! And keep trying!

I abt 90 years There is no zaibbuzz😂

But why are the laws of the universe so definite, the laws haven’t change, our understanding has, and where ever there’s order there’s a mind behind, a single change in in the universe and everything collapses, the orderliness of the universe only proves God’s existence, there has to be someone watching over, else the world would be in flames

@@elvisanthony6817 it is in flames

​@@duck323 God will leave us temporarily if we want Him to. But even then, He won't leave you alone for long. You have to keep pushing Him away. You can use distractions such as social media, news feeds, gossip, etc. to help push Him out of your consciousness. You can also spend as little time as possible outdoors, or wondering about spiritual things, reading, meditating or praying, and definitely do not ask God to help you. Because if you did, you might end up on a different path, and that would bring you closer to Him, and then you might actually accept His will for you.

@@elvisanthony6817 Then there is no god because entropy increases. We go from absolute order to increasing chaos as the universe ages.

Every point in the Universe is the centre.

How do you know

@@duck323 He read in a book and if that book wasn't true, he wouldn't believe it. And that's all the proof he needs.

​@@donthesitatebegin9283You have 0 evidence

If I see God, would I be willing to change my perception of Him and align with what is revealed?

he's dead. he can't wish for anything 😂