Here are some counterarguments to the points raised in the narrative While the narrative criticizes the idea of human superiority as self-serving, one could argue that humans possess unique cognitive abilities that allow for complex problem-solving, abstract thinking, and the creation of advanced technologies. These capabilities have enabled humans to adapt and thrive in diverse environments, which could be seen as a form of superiority in the context of survival and adaptation. The argument that superiority is relative and based on personal interest can be countered by pointing out that humans have developed ethical and moral frameworks that often extend beyond self-interest. These frameworks guide actions that benefit other species and the environment, suggesting a capacity for altruism and stewardship that is not commonly observed in other species. The claim that humans self-appoint themselves as the dominant species might overlook the tangible ways in which human activities have reshaped the planet. From altering global climate patterns to causing species extinctions, the impact of humans is undeniable and suggests a level of influence that is unparalleled in the history of other species. It's true that other species also impact the Earth, but the scale and speed of human-induced changes are unprecedented. Humans have the ability to consciously reflect on their actions and make deliberate choices about their impact, which could be argued as a sign of dominance or at least significant influence. The narrative's call for existential humility could be met with the perspective that humans, through their awareness and intelligence, have the unique responsibility to manage and protect the Earth. This role does not necessarily stem from arrogance but from a recognition of the power and responsibility that comes with human capabilities. In essence, while the narrative encourages a more integrated view of humans within the natural world, these counterarguments suggest that human traits and impacts do indeed set us apart in significant ways. The debate between human exceptionalism and ecological egalitarianism is complex and multifaceted, with valid points on both sides.

@@narayanbarman5993 again you're doing the same thing like making a criteria which suits you and you say that see we can do this that why we are superior.........if it's like that....then any other species is superior..bcz they all have some special abilities....like planaria comes and says that if someone will cut us then also we won't die....thats why I'm superior

@@user-hc8eo5gy9m while it’s true every species has unique abilities, the concept of “superiority” extends beyond individual traits . If you think deeply you would find the very ability of human species of making criteria make them superior to any species presently known 🌀

@@user-hc8eo5gy9m Read the counterarguments again and the very ability of human species to make criteria makes them superior to any species presently known

​@@narayanbarman5993 jai ho chat gpt devta ki

I like meat

Commenting under just to see meat debates

​@aishwarykalosia7129 pls do not shit everywhere nobody wanna know yr likes and dislikes.

There we go!

​@@justalive24 relax soy boy, the comment section is for opinions! And he made his choice!

ChatGPT?

@@ChandanKumar-re9eh Bhai don't putt off his dhoti yr 😂

​​@@vishalrao497Give counterarguments if you have any but not your bullshit opinion 😉

@@narayanbarman5993 bhai dubara search krlo chat gpt iska bhi counter dedega 🙃

You are right. If we hadn't been superior we would be talking about our being or not being superior.

And what about the microorganisms themselves?

@@tide7107 and what about the "almost every" in my comment?

@@rajkamble-fr6dm even microorganisms are interdependent on other microorganisms that's what I'm trying to get across, there's no "almost", it's just "all"

Yes ryt

Just being there counts as dominant?

Because they were farmed since 10000 years

They are more useful to us doesn't make them dominant. We could state it like "Grasses like wheat, paddy, etc. are dominant species IN REGARD WITH CONSUMPTION BY HUMANS"

@@No-I-dont-want-that without them human can't survive, think about it

@@prodigious5766 yep consumption. Without dem human can't survive , think about it.

see ScienceIsDope video on Hanuman Chalisa

Incorrect, we would have been more sustainable if that were true. Rather we could not even develop a system which safeguards future of our species.

@@fazer79 If that's incorrect, name a species which has more consciousness than humans on Earth.

Other mammals have way better senses,reflexes,survival instincts etc

@@thunderred5263 you should read the comment again

So you agree that the universe is not independent

@@nonameno5660 yes

he wouldn’t be able to because there’s no thing known as atheistism

Non veg

@@ATHEIST_69 am why ?

Non veg because I find it tasty and fills my daily consumption of protein without spending a lot.

That's unity among diversity

Unity among diversity

Mortein ka machine toh dekh liya par all out ka refill kaha hai LOL

Yes. That's what it is important to remember. When we declare humans superior, we are using human metrics.

hypothetically a bug or aliens may have their own metrics. but we're the only ones around defining metrics. I agree with us needing to have humility about our place in the world. but there's no denying that homo sapiens are a badass species. humanity's perception of superiority may just be an evolutionary by product of self preservation. I don't agree that it has anything to do with religion, but we can agree to disagree.

Every species defeats nature to survive

@@vimoh yup! But haven't we the most.

@@vimoh and I'm not glorifying human existence.

No. That assessment is pretty subjective.

At current rate, we might defeat ourselves, by destroying nature, wars, etc

We evolved to aurvive and live collectively. Nah, no chance that 1 yr old would ever survive a week, unless some miracle

Jungle book lmao

Many animals have been found to be self aware.

Kisi ko jai mst bolo ..

Do Aliens exist is evidence conclusive

@@nonameno5660 That was most probably an analogy.

Are other animals unconscious? Seem conscious to me?

@@vimoh Uhh not like that !! I mean you're not wrong but like our minds are more advanced to be aware of our surroundings, to coordinate with each other, to know universe better and like that. I agree that mankind isn't special but there is something different in mankind... it can be DNA or mind ??

Plenty of animals are aware of their surroundings and coordinate with each other.

Tumne likhi konsi book bacteria ne pdhi hai 😂

yes because of the face is not shaved

He literally said he’d be reuploading his Hindi videos on this channel

Ants and bees use resources to build structures. Dolphins and whales understand humans. Chimpanzees and elephants even have culture.

@@vimoh Well Bhaijaan are they all in one?

You asked for parallels. You never said they had to be all in one. Even we are not all in one. Can we fly without planes? Can we solve puzzles faster than a Chimp? No.

@@vimoh ok let me point a arrow can you give a creature that has done what us humans have done and can beat us in 60:40 Ratio or more

@@vimoh Still waiting Lol for a Rational Answer by you or by a follower of yours

I think he said he's 41 in some stream

@@prodigious5766 can you please provide the link of that video here

Superiority or Inferiority depends on the matrices on which we're comparing on. For example: In the case of Intelligence, no other organism has a chance against humans. But what about other aspects? Speed, Strength, Durability, Regeneration, etc. And the answer to your counter argument; Monkeys don't have enough Intelligence to do the same things, just as humans don't have a tail and can't challenge them in a competition of climbing trees. Hope you understood, Be humble for humanity. Sayonara.

bhai tumhare jism mein bacteria bhare hue hain jo tumhara istemaal kar rahe hain.

@@vimoh wo mere liye hi hai

Agar wo nuksan dayak hai to uska ilaj ho sakta hai our wo mere fayde ke liye hai to wo mere jariye se hai wo mere bina to kuchh bhi nahi hai

tum bacteria ke liye ho ye bhi kaha jaa sakta hai.

@@vimoh bacteria mere andar hai ya mai bacteia ke andar hu

I on the other hand, always expect pointless comments like this.

@@vimoh What you said implies that humans can’t be objective. That it’s all just opinions and stories.

Nope. Didn't say that at all.

@@vimoh why did you bring Aliens into the argument if not for saying that we aren’t capable of being objective about human significance.

Argue karna hai toh vimoh ki live pe kar na

insaan supeeriyar hai yah ek dhaarmik aaidiya bhee hai aur ek saintiphik aaidiya par yah sab kuchh had tak hee sahee hai

@@Vader4499 introvert hu, dam nahi hai 😶

@@utkarshsingh-rp2dq na a a... Pura padha kya aapne?

@@anandchoure1343And I don’t think you’re getting the point Vimoh is making. Superiority judge karne keliye criteria bhi ham decide kar rahe hai aur judge bhi ham kar rahe hai. Yeh sahi nahi hai. Aapne inn paragraph par apni khudh ki definition ke hisaab se bataya hai ki ek new born aur adult mein superiority judge kari ja sakti hai lekin agar kuch criterion se dekhe toh new born superior bola ja sakta hai

Then who created god??

@@izzo5027 Nothingness created God.

said a human

@@vimoh it’s the only possibility 😄

Yes. And that makes it a subjective opinion.

@@vimoh would you say Science is also a subjective opinion as it’s also done by humans? No because it’s a pursuit to be objective about what’s really true about the physical reality. And humans possessing Creativity is an objective fact which no other living or non living thing possesses.

Science is a method. Themethod has independent utility. We are talking about assigning value here. If you said science is the best pursuit there is, I would say that that is an opinion.

Humans are superior it is one of the idea originating from the religion.

Bhai physical world ki baat ho Rahi hai. God kaha se aaya