a visualisation of the 2 opposing currents needed for electric power
Пікірлер: 95
@moonfther6 ай бұрын
very good analogy! the magic of the vortex.
@danielfoster27882 ай бұрын
Very good visual aid !
@user-cz4sr6bh5h6 ай бұрын
I have been waiting for a long time, and I finally got to see your release video. Although I'm not sure what you're doing, I'm still very excited and eagerly looking forward to the new release.
@caseycourtney64256 ай бұрын
Possible video incoming?!? Am very excited!
@e.powerdc11276 ай бұрын
This is one of the best examples of magnetism on the net. Now we can take one step further, how? This is one pole in terms of magnetism. Copy the image turn it upside down and insert the dielectric spin out at the center point of a magnet. In an ac transformer it's the central tap point. You will now have the model like Tesla's words " think vibration". Evo this image also applies to the working of galaxies and how power is drawn from the Aether. 5 star. ..... DC .
@MasterIvo6 ай бұрын
yes, this is a dc analog. ac would invert the flow directions. the cold current flow is important as it needs to be mixed with the magnetic current to create power.
@e.powerdc11276 ай бұрын
@@MasterIvo Next step:- understanding why Tesla said " Electrons Do Not Exist"! What happens around the wire? Answer:- Everything is a Magnet. Discuss? Regards DC
@MasterIvo6 ай бұрын
@@e.powerdc1127 the cold current is not magnetic. that also explains why my extra coil didn't produce power while current and voltage were in phase. the current was not magnetic. the non magnetic cold current needs to be "mixed" with magnetic current to produce real power.
@e.powerdc11276 ай бұрын
@@MasterIvo I agree a mix at 90°. Imagine your vortex at the center of the mix Your video really helps if you imagine it working as per a magnet's field lines. Reference Ken Wheelers channel. AC. Is like tumbling rotationional magnets at set frequencys. Think have we measure amps on the outside of the wire. Regards DC
@MasterIvo6 ай бұрын
@@e.powerdc1127 mix at 90 degrees would be resonant thus no power. for power mix at 180 degrees, as the 2 currents need to be opposing
@dananorth895Ай бұрын
If you take a boat paddle and placing it vertically in the water. Draw it along swiftly, you will see two opposing vortices ( opposite rotations) that join and connect at the bottom. If you drop florescent dye down either vortice it surfaces up through the other opposing vortice!
@apoc746823 күн бұрын
Love it, very cool analogy!
@MasterIvo22 күн бұрын
Glad you like it!
@jaidubya43212 ай бұрын
Reminds me of Leedskalnin’s Magnetic Current - + monopoles run against - monopoles.
@dananorth895Ай бұрын
He describes two opposing currents as well.
@Renew_You6 ай бұрын
I my need more digestion to comprehend this. In my mind's eye, suction created by the pump in the collum of water is manifesting centrifugal force that's facilitating displacement current mirrored by the centripetal return of cold air current. The vortex interface is the dielectric field creating a spiral stair way in a bipolar vibration. I've not noticed the interaction before to this depth. Thank you for sharing, Ivo. Brilliantly illuminating!
@Seasquares6 ай бұрын
Great explanation!
@user-mj1dd4qf6v6 ай бұрын
The analogy is PERFECT in my opinion
@steadyeddy65266 ай бұрын
EXCELLENT insight. Every DOWNWARD is always accompanied by an upward .Gravity needs antigravity .
@raymitchell97366 ай бұрын
Excellent demonstration!
@elams18946 ай бұрын
pressure gradient
@michaelmyrick69735 ай бұрын
nice work. very accurate sir 🫡🙏🏼
@cosmicyoke6 ай бұрын
YES! im glad you discovered this, this is also similar to how conventional current flows "opposite" to electron flow! (we know that in reality its probably like a vortex!)
@JenkoRun6 ай бұрын
For the record conventional current is still misunderstood, the real magnetic current "flows" from N to P while the Dielectric flows from P to N, Electrons are just the waste heat where the wire has failed to reflect the Dielectric field (cold current) As Thomson originally described it, the terminal end of 1 unit of Dielectric induction.
@madtscientist88536 ай бұрын
If you'd like to learn more about this. Look up Victor schaumburger The Nickola Tesla of the water world.
@JenkoRun6 ай бұрын
Cold Current in this case is the Dielectric field right? But doesn't it run perpendicular to the reflector (wire) and terminate on other reflectors instead of flowing parallel like the air in the water vortex?
@MasterIvo6 ай бұрын
it is the displacement (flow) of the dielectric field, caused by a change in voltage
@JenkoRun6 ай бұрын
@@MasterIvo Am I correct in understanding that the displacement motion of the Dielectric both "flows" parallel to a wire and originates/terminates perpendicular to it as depicted in Steinmetz's diagram? I hadn't considered it would "move" like that but I suppose it makes sense when mentally visualizing it.
@MasterIvo6 ай бұрын
@@JenkoRun yes I feel that is correct
@alanx41216 ай бұрын
@@MasterIvo i see disp current from a changing e field or voltage as charge rearrangement, is this somewhat correct?
@MasterIvo6 ай бұрын
@@alanx4121 charge is present in the field. Not as virtual particles which are only a mathematical representation of the field . the field itself holds the charge. is the charge. and it is this volume of energy within the field that is being displaced. moved. longitudinal. by the fast change in voltage.
@paaao4 ай бұрын
I tend to think of electricity as a hybrid outcome of diverting the dielectric field. The dielectric field is all around us. It's within, and without of everything, all matter, and empty space. It's the reason space and matter exist. With that said, if you build an alternator, or a battery, you are setting up a potential for the dielectric field to diverge and reconnect, or balance itself back out to rest after being placed under strain or torsion. The voltage or capacitance is the dielectric component. The more work you put in to build that potential, the greater the dielectric component is going to seek balance back to it's resting state. The magnetic component is the other half. This is the current or (electron flow). Since the dielectric seeks rest and the magnetic pushes outward, you can use a dielectricly reflective material to direct the process through space, slow, or increase the process. These reflectors are what people call conductors. Copper, aluminum, etc... Once a potential has been built up, the dielectric component immediately begins trying to transform via the magnetic to eliminate the imbalance. Once it overcomes any insulating barriers, the magnetic energy pushes into space with that potential, expelling energy and moving towards rest energy. The dielectric directs and confines this energy expense and in the case of conductors, attaches between and to the surface of the two. This is why there is skin effect. The energy is not within the wires, it is actually between them. Manifest only due to the field being under torsion. The dielectric/magnetic field are one. Together they're like two sides of the same coin. One creating space, and exerting energy release, and the other removing space and returning to infinite potential.
@MasterIvo4 ай бұрын
dielectric displacement current + magnetic conduction current = power
@theazerbaijani93495 ай бұрын
Hi Master Ivo! I have a question, Can the dielectric field push away/resist magnetism? It seems like you are using dielectric to have zero resistivity like a superconductor. Does this mean it can also show diamagnetic properties like a superconductor?
@cold3lectric6 ай бұрын
Cold, and Electric, I'm liking it :) Actually i borrowed my handle "coldelectric" from the old borderlands science/peter lindemann "cold electricity" stuff; doubt this is related (?) Thanks ivo, beautiful shot!
@JenkoRun6 ай бұрын
It's the same thing, the cold electricity in Lindemann's book is the Dielectric Field operating on extremely short duration times, less than 100 microseconds is when the effects are no longer harmful.
@cold3lectric6 ай бұрын
@@JenkoRun excellent 😺
@lucdrouin26252 ай бұрын
Very novel way of looking at power generation parameters. Now incorporate frequency.
@calcoin41995 ай бұрын
Please give us video soon 😢
@chonthanhtinh92686 ай бұрын
I like Chopin Richard Clayderman
@deanfloyd893113 күн бұрын
The container appears to never lose volume, where is the water supply coming from?
@MasterIvo13 күн бұрын
there is a pump in the basin underneath. It pumps water into the bottom of the cylinder
@markweintraut74206 ай бұрын
Ivo, pls blow some cigar smoke over the top so we can see
@JenkoRun6 ай бұрын
You can see in the way the water vortex is moving in there, the screw motion of the water is flowing down and CCW, as a result the only option available for the air is to move up and CW so it can follow the available path from shape, you can also see the structure of the vortex is "rippling" upwards.
@markweintraut74206 ай бұрын
@@JenkoRun Truth be told I would like to measure the air movement and its subsequent volume or lack thereof. I would rater not speculate on the air direction based on the fact Ivo is pumping water in from the bottom. If I had to guess I would say Yes Air Moving UP, But so Is the Water Also Moving UP!. In a normal gravity drain vortex air must replace water in the vessel but this is inverted.
@MasterIvo6 ай бұрын
I can show it with smoke in one bottle, and another bottle inverted on top filled with water. the water will move down and the air will move up. no pump needed
@Arwndr5 ай бұрын
But.... In this example in video, water actually flow Up, not down. And air in vortex does not move, just present to fill empty space without water. Vortex itself is present because of centrifugal force and surface tension force. Dynamic balance. Waves in vortex - just pressure waves because of difference in speed of water molecules near vortex. Air itself do nothing in this example. And don't flow anywhere. Only water flows.
@MasterIvo5 ай бұрын
you are correct. This is not the best example. A better example would have been 2 bottles on top of eachother, connected by their necks, the Tornado Tube is a toy that connects the bottles. (top one inverted). bottom bottle is filled with water. top one filled with air. (empty /vacuum does not exist!). then invert them. water now is in the top bottle, and starts to generate a vortex, while moving down into the bottom bottle. at the same time, the air moves up. I hope now you will see the analogy, with voltage, magnetic current and displacement (cold) current.
@theazerbaijani93496 ай бұрын
are there any books or research paper on this? if there are can you provide us with them too please
@JenkoRun6 ай бұрын
Electric Discharges, Waves And Impulses 2nd edition by Steinmetz The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity by Peter Lindemann The Missing Secrets of Magnetism 3rd edition by Ken Wheeler
@theazerbaijani93496 ай бұрын
@@JenkoRun thank you! I assume these only explain electricity and magnetism. Are there any other books that explain nuclear physics, atomic bondings, ball lightning and other physical phenomenon?
@JenkoRun6 ай бұрын
@@theazerbaijani9349 The books I mentioned all cover the Dielectric field to some degree with Ken's book being the most extensive, his book also touches on those other topics as well. I also recommend finding and downloading his PDF files he's made like his Definitions, CosmicUnity, EnergyUnified, ETC, PDF files since he's covered a lot. A more dedicated book to Electrics would be Eric Dollard's "A common language for electrical engineering" Another book you might like is "Secrets of cold war technology" by Gerry Vassilatos, he gets a few things wrong like thinking the Electron is a particle but it's still valuable. There's also Water Russel's "The Universal One" and "Light does not travel" For some more exotic things like the effects of Shapes there is "Shape Power" by Dan Davidson and "The Pyramid how to build it how to use it" by Les Brown 1978, there's also Viktor Grebenikov with his geometry research that insects have, there's also Tesla Field Physics here on KZfaq that's covered some interesting things based on the work of Ken, Steinmetz, Tesla, Dollard, Edward Leedskalnin, etc. Ken has also done videos on things like Atoms, I usually just put in "Theoria Apophasis [subject here]" on YT to see if he's covered a topic and what he has to say about it. And for Water research we have Viktor Schauberger, also nicknamed the Water Wizard and widely considered the Tesla of Water. Information on Ball Lightning is rather lacking sadly, I've been looking myself, all I really know about it is that it's a roaming plasma ball with a spherical frequency, a non propagating energy burst caused by extremely high potential too high to instantly discharge, but details like the required conditions and order of events that create it is unknown to me. There's more but I think this will give you a pretty good starting point, if you branch out from each of those sources and related content you'll probably find yourself going down a rabbit hole of information, it's how I tend to find stuff anyway.
@theazerbaijani93495 ай бұрын
@@JenkoRun I have a question, Can the dielectric field push away/resist magnetism? It seems like İvo is using dielectric to have zero resistivity like a superconductor. Does this mean it can also show diamagnetic properties like a superconductor?
@JenkoRun5 ай бұрын
@@theazerbaijani9349 I don't know if it can "push" magnetism since contact between those 2 is what creates the effects of momentum which we call electric power, but it can indeed display superconducting properties and has been experimentally verified by the Russian duo Stanislav and Konstantin Avramenko in1993. It mainly works on alternating voltage potential, an open wire with that kind of current flowing through it without magnetism completely ignores series connected resistors, inductors, and capacitors, other experiments I've heard of have diodes acting as nothing more than like a leaky resistor in those conditions, again it's because there is no magnetism, hence no friction to resist the wires, typically alternating voltage potential doesn't care about resistance. You can read more of the details on "4 Methods for Single Wire Power Transmission" by waveguide
@hobewray88095 ай бұрын
Can the bifilar coil be used for scalar healing? If so how can this be accomplished? Thanks a million, I’m new to all this.
@MasterIvo5 ай бұрын
yes it can
@hobewray88095 ай бұрын
Where would be the frequency input on the coil? Could you please let me know? Thank you for sharing your excellent knowledge with your audience!@@MasterIvo
@MasterIvo5 ай бұрын
@@hobewray8809 it can be done by directly giving it a signal, or by using the fields of another coil to induce it. whereby magnetic induction can be used, but also dielectric induction. that last way gives the most interesting results. the coil then acts as a capacitor plate, and the primary coil is the other capacitor plate. when the primary has sharp changes in voltage these effects appear best.
@hobewray88095 ай бұрын
Thank you, but I don’t see where the ground wire hooks up. I see that the coil has two ends which are common because the upper and lower coils connect in series. So if I input a frequency into one of the ends, where does the ground go? Presuming the other open end attaches to a sphere that transmits to an opposite coil and receiving sphere. Do you have a diagram that you could share regarding my lack of understanding 😂? I really appreciate your help, sincerely, Doug@@MasterIvo
@MasterIvo5 ай бұрын
@@hobewray8809 you do not always need ground! use the negative of the frequency generator to connect to ground
@3nt3rtain3 ай бұрын
Dielectric and Magnetic fields?
@MasterIvo3 ай бұрын
cp Steinmetz named the electric field the dielectric field, as he called the electric field the combined fields of dielectric and magnetic fields (holding electric power).
@philindeblanc6 ай бұрын
Victor Shoufhousen
@JenkoRun6 ай бұрын
Don't you mean Schauberger?
@philindeblanc6 ай бұрын
Yes, thank you!!!@@JenkoRun
@Cryptic_Triptych2 ай бұрын
Congratulations you have proven my theory of how Nature works. -1, 0, +1. Implosion, compression and explosion. Einstein and Claude Shannon have based their ideas on only explosion and binary system technology. Hannes Alfven is also missing the third part in his idea of Magnetohydrodynamics. I, like Viktor Schauberger and Nikola Tesla, understand the Implosion and 3, 6, 9 methods.
@JenkoRun2 ай бұрын
If you're confident Tesla's 3 6 9 quote is authentic please provide the source, I have seen no evidence that he ever said that.
@Cryptic_Triptych2 ай бұрын
@@JenkoRun “If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6, and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.” - Nikola Tesla.
@JenkoRun2 ай бұрын
@@Cryptic_Triptych Yes, what's the source of the quote? I'm not seeing a source here.
@Cryptic_Triptych2 ай бұрын
@JenkoRun don't get hung up over it. NT may or may not of actually uttered those exact words. The bases behind it was to explain his fascination with numerical sequences squirrel cage motor windings and the energy, frequency and vibration quote. It's similar to the misinterpreted quote from Ed Leedskalnin, "sweet sixteen". Even when reporters get the qoutes correct, hardly anyone understand the deep implications.
@Cryptic_Triptych2 ай бұрын
@JenkoRun if you want something to chase after, tell people to quit using their Tesla coils backwards. Or you can go build a TREC system, like Lawrence Rayburn did.
@wcommbiz6 ай бұрын
I think he is trying to see if were paying attention, looks like water moving up, spilling out the top.
@MasterIvo6 ай бұрын
ha no. no tricks. it does swirl down, but it is filled up by a powerfull pump at the bottom, which is making it overflow.