it would be better if you never said stoopidness.!!!

exactly, all he does is repeat fake science

I think the fact that the honest version _didn't_ "start" when turned says it all.

watch the video again and try to understand what he's actually saying. then you might start to understand why the others videos are just view bait

2000 to 3000 watt, the windings from motor to the windings of generator must be act like a stepup transformer.

Its called stop video because the battery will not last that long

Not really. You always have to think of it as a field of magnetic flux and vectors. Depending on the relative orientation, direction and movement of the magnet and the coil (+its core) the relative vector might vary and induce smaller voltage (Maxwell equations) and not a continuous sinus, but just some bump, as shown at 3:40.

Right... the energy comes from whatever is pushing the magnet. You can't push the magnet with the energy produced by the magnet being pushed... what I want to know from the free energy types is an explanation of where the energy comes from, not just "build this device and it will spin forever because... well, it's a secret, big oil is watching me"

Tesla? No. Not even close.

@@CJCruiser it’s simple I’ve tried it and it does work it’s not fake how do you think a dynamo works in a car! It charges the battery so you put it to another motor it will power it simple!

@@seanseverythingandanything6440 you have never used the lever, it is something that has been used to amplify or increase the main force. for example if you want to move a heavy object. if you enter the mechanical field if 2 keys have the same circumference a short handle and a long handle. the long handle has more possibility to do the job faster

@@seanseverythingandanything6440 The combustion of fuel provides the energy to turn the dynamo. It does not create any power, only converts mechanical energy from the engine into electricity at about 80% efficiency. It can never make enough power to spin itself no matter what motor you attach to it.

Sounds like a good thing to try.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oa6BiKqXyq6tZH0.html

You see this is your problem, you don't think outside the box. This is why idiots like these can tell you it's fake. It works

There RC motors

Hidden battery and inverter. And you can run a big motor on very low power, just with no load.

Personally I don't trust these Agent Smith videos. We all know the rich have a lot of power, control, and wealth to lose if they can't keep dinging everyone for energy consumption. Only way to know for sure is to throw one together yourself.

‘Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…’ Winston S Churchill, 11 November 1947

man we need someone like you for president haha

I really love the last paragraph that you said👏

@@pstonard You right Peter, so Democratically chosen Governments are never just, or impartial, because people elect the leader often based on his charisma, like that comedian who now runs Ukraine, wanted to join NATO and upset Russians, but a sensible Dictator would not have let this happen that caused so much devastation to both sides, all the way that we are now facing true Nuclear crises, thats because people choose leaders not on their merit and experience , as an example both UK PM and Chancellor been nominated by party members, and look what happened to our Pound!

Nice work, well put. I think there stupid not corrupt. They been brainwashed to believe wat quality & how to run a world maintain power etc etc..things since birth most of them. Just like us. Corruption is a small part, lacking imagination & sense is a major part of the problem. They put stupid ppl in charge to maintain sosociety & spastiCITY! Democracy is not a good thing if the ppl are all retards & have no concept of reality. Wat you want & wat you need are not always compatable. If you don't think or imagine, dream or see things in different lights then you fight for wat you know not wat could be.

Liberty motor is a scam.

a coupler will not work : it inverses the rotation, you'd create a short-circuit instantly. Another argument to debunk the debunker LOL

@@dirklanduyt they make opposite spinning motors or you could reverse the polarity. All motors in the world dont spin in one direction

The best decision in any experiment is to apply knowledge to predict the outcome. Then verify it by experiment. Once in a while an experiment does something completely unexpected and that is called a discovery. The supporters of "Free Energy" believe the presenters have an experiment with unexplained out come, that defies the theory, and becomes their secret discovery. At that point it is rational and expected by the scientific and engineering community to publish the results and allow Peer review. None of these Free Energy contraptions have been published (beyond FAKE click bait) or subjected for third-party peer review. Only a soft head will cling to the claims made that these are real over unity contraptions.

@@dirklanduyt Wrong! Motor rotation can easily be reversed by reconfiguration of the wires. In this case the swapping of any two phases of the three. Red to Yellow instead of Red to Red and Yellow to Yellow. Machines that use three-phase motors typically have a switch to make this change. Running a lathe "backwards" for example.

Your request is that we "prove a negative"? That's impossible! If you did try to replicate what you have seen in the FAKE videos, and then you complain, the author and presenters of the FAKE videos can simply say "you did it wrong", or "you don't have the right parts", or they left something out "to keep it secret", or "Big Oil (or the government) will come after you". Any story to keep you guessing that the Free-energy scheme is real. As P.T.Barnum said "There's a sucker born every minute" and he was spot on!

this guy is producing false information.

@@amazingpower2761 Which part is false,be specific.

@@davidgill3356 his whole opinion is false on how it works. then he does show it by build one from supposedly "fake" video and his version on how they faked it himself.

@@davidgill3356 They don’t get energy out of the magnet and it has nothing to do with the copper wiring that's there other than its original job. The magnet turns the motor by using the shell of the motor as it turns since the shell or cover is made out of metal. As the motor turns it generates energy similar to a water turbine on dams instead of a propeller or whatever is inside a dams mechanics its the magnets and the metal cover of the motor that is the water and the magnets the propeller that spins the turbine. the use of the other motor is for it to keep it at a constant spin so it generates the max amount of energy or power. because the momentum of the magnets and the spinning will eventually stop.

@@diesiraeetvindictae1635I know perfectly well it doesn’t work. I was trying to figure out if the guy making the comment thought he was lying about it being faked or if he just missed the whole point.

I will build one soon, f.. too cold now!!

No, he didn't, he _faked_ what he did.

Refusing to acknowledge basic physics principles so that you can continue believing conspiracy theories isn't being a skeptic. It's being wilfully ignorant.

@@GeoffCostanza perfectly very well said

if these free energy devices work then why doesnt the government set up a giant one and give free energy?

Did you have your video? Lemme see!

Feel free to publish your work. Share some PIX and electrical measurements. Would you allow a peer review? Without proof you only have a story...

@@darklight2.1 Just build one yourself!.

@@PraefectusStirling But why do we ask when we can build? Youre the one who built you can show it and explain it how it works

Actions speaks louder than voice. I'll try it also.

Ye ikr

yup indeed the natural laws prohibit more out than you put in. so i would love to see the facts in the build. i have plenty spare alternators to play with and an electric motor is easy to find but i just cannot see how this can work. if it is reality i am going to buy an electric car and dump the V8 :D

The motivation is not just science, but human greed. Read the comments on the "free energy" videos, many come to ask where they can get the machine or parts to build their own. Often it is to by-pass their own conventional electricity bill or to power their third-world village. It's also greed that motivates copy cat videos that lust for click bait. Sad.

@@wesleyconn620 Jaja - Das ist wie beim Baby machen. Da kommt auch mehr raus als was du da reinsteckst.:D

the videos and subsequent responses make a good pertpetual energy machine

Wow great explanation now I’m dumber 😆

Yes, the generator formula defines the relationship between magnetic flux (in Webers), rotation speed (N), and number of turns of wire (Z) that is "cut" by the lines of magnetic force, and the number of poles (P) to produce Total EMF (E) \[ E = P \phi \frac{N}{60} \times \frac{Z}{2} \] \[ E = \frac{P \phi N}{120} \] Consider a DC machine with the following parameter; P = Number of poles Ф = Flux per pole (Wb) A = Number of parallel paths in the armature Z = Total number of Armature conductor N = Speed of Rotor (RPM) An automobile alternator exists in literally millions of units manufactured each year, great effort is taken to make the design efficient and reliable. Do you think that attaching a few random magnets is going to suddenly make it "perfect"? These FAKE videos don't pass any common sense exam.

Sadly, what you said is probably true. But your statement doesn't show a relation to this video.

It is very magnanimous of him to put his perpetual energy machine on you tube rather than create a company to build the product that would transform humanity and make him the richest man in the world.

So what do you mean by good work by discouraging imagination and growth are you one of the persons that still works at a coal mine Again hes one of these naysayers trying to keep you in a small frame of mind he has no imagination he can never build or develop anything out of his book learning, Of course hes going to get angry they got angry at nikolai Tesla they also got angry at Nathan stubblefield these inventors they try to erase from history. What he told you is not all wrong it's just a 1/2 truth you see that he did not demonstrate any of his points with those motors so I'm going to leave anybody who wants to find out for themselves information on what we gathered from the library and what we actually did, That's if this post stays up remember they always try to erase things so I'll be screenshot in this post so all of you can see if or not he takes it down why if your argument is strong you shouldn't have any problem of expressing your point and letting people see and make Up their own minds and better yet experimenting with these types of things as we have at our library. And for anyone who sees this post please Read the comments even when you show proof with no funny business they're going to deny that you even did what you did, Now they're going to claim that you did something or put something inside and all you have to do is just follow the directions for yourselves ask questions if you don't understand. But anyway here's some videos for you to watch please watch them all and then you'll understand it's not free energy it's not perpetual motion is how to loop energy and store energy And then put it back into the system and here is the proof. 1st video kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eMCKl7yQp7qnl6c.html 2nd video kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f5uVebdpnMjPgWQ.html Reference from lid motor kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qr2libh1z72rg6M.html

"There goes some energy straight off the bat." Never mind that the rest of the energy was freely created, losing a small amount of power for a cooling fan is an L = Shill for energy companies or internet dumbass?

@@duyvuitton6019 I really hope you are an internet troll or a Gen Z'er who believes everything they see on the web (Yay tide pods!) and don't honestly believe you can get more than what you put in. If you didn't get what I was meaning in my comment, I was hinting to the fact that there are losses that none of these free energy machines take into consideration. It's not just windage, there are many things that stops any of these devices from actually functioning in the real world like energy being wasted through the wires heating up, friction from the bearings, belts and brushes which creates heat, the drag of on the rotating masses going through the magnetic field, etc, etc, etc. How about some basic math, we will ignore losses for the moment. In this situation a 1000w motor can drive a 1000w alternator by itself, now say I wanted to put a 600w load on it. What happens? The speed of the the motor would drop until it stops because there is not enough energy to supply the motor and the load. So what if you put a bigger alternator on it? Lets say 1600w. Well you will still only have 1000w of energy since the motor can only output 1000w, so when you put that 600w load on it, it will stop that motor in the same way due to not enough energy being in the system to keep that motor spinning. As for being a shill for the energy companies, well I'd be the worst spokesman for them, as I'm working on converting my caravan to solar so I can go off grid and I'm helping a mate of mine build a gasifier and biogas generation system so we can make human waste into burnable gas and compost, while he builds me a waste oil burner. The fact we don't all have solar on the roofs of our houses so we'd have abundant free energy honestly gets at me. If you want free power there is solar, hydro, wind, tidal and thermal, these will produce power passively, each one has there downsides but at least they actually work.

@@newdawn8477 So you're saying it does work to produce energy but mad because you're not achieving full efficiency... you clearly missing the point that perpetual creation of energy w/out reliance of the power grid is a win. You need more than 600w of power? Here's an idea, use more powerful hardware than what they showed...

@@duyvuitton6019 It went right over your head didn't, everything I wrote was proving it could not work and will not work. I even gave you the best outcome by not factoring in LOSSES. Go back to school and learn the law of conservation of energy or haven't you got that far? Even if you had a 15000w motor and a 15000w alternator with ZERO losses, it still wouldn't work. Any load will deplete the system of energy. Think about it and I mean think about it. Ever noticed most of the videos come out of the middle east? Could it be they think the west is stupid and by posting videos like that they know someone around the world will waste their time trying to build it... Thinking about it you should put your money where you mouth is and build one and have it running a 3kw load (this should be easy for you), video it running and then dissemble it with no cuts and post the link here, I WILL watch your attempt. All of the parts can be brought off of ebay and ali. Just prove me wrong by doing that.

@@duyvuitton6019 No, that is in no way what he is saying and he isn’t angry. You are just too ignorant to understand, don’t get mad bro.

No need to over comlicate the issue. Just run a small (automotive type) alternator from the engine. Or, come to that, mount a small wind turbine, ideally high up the mast.

there are concepts out there to this but as you mentioned it its hard to do, as a electo nuclear profesor it didnt belive in such a thing, reasech and building changed my mind. work for a Gov and you will know how it works. trade off to it is the generator and how big it can get

Thank you, smart physics guy/engineer! FINALLY someone debunking the close-minded "debunkers"!

If you spin a motor with your hand, it produces an electromotive force. You essentially make it a generator. When the motor spins from an applied voltage, this still happens. Thus, a voltage that opposes the voltage applied to the motor is induced. This limits the current through the motor. So, the unloaded RPM of the motor may be 1500 RPM, but when you attach the generator as a load, the motor will slow. When the motor slows, the induced voltage decreases, just like spinning a generator more slowly produces less voltage. This actually increases the current, and thus the power consumption of the motor. So, if the motor spins at 750 RPM, it may consume twice the power or more. Now the generator produces 4kW, and the motor needs 7kW to run at that RPM, and it slows. This cycle continues until the system stops.

"in theory, a transformer with two 1: 1 windings should also be such a device." Yes, a transformer is more efficient than coupled rotating machines (aka motor plus generator) BUT efficiency would have to exceed unity (100%) for this theory to work. Let's say a motor is 80% efficient, meaning 20% losses, Now find a good transformer that is ten times better, meaning only two percent loss, you still need that lost 2% to reach unity. QED.

Some die hard jews on here.

Also variable speed with potentiometer

Non ha spiegato assolutamente nulla

Sounds like a good idea to me.

The generator would turn faster than the motor, but speed and power are different things. They are related when power is expressed as the product of speed and the force opposing that motion. So the motor with wheel diameter of 2 would only be able to keep turning the generator with wheel diameter of 1 if the generator's opposition to turning was low enough (half of the torque from the motor in this case). Because generating electrical power presents internal opposition to the generator turning, this can only happen when electical output of the generator is less (maybe a lot less) than the electrical power the motor is using. The power rating numbers on the side of these devices aren't automatically achieved just because you 'turn' the generator or 'power' the motor. You get less electrical power out of a generator than the torque times speed (mechanical power) you put in. Similarly, you get less torque times speed (mechanical power) out of a motor than the electical power you put in. And for each device, the useful power plus the heat (thermal power) they are putting out is equal to the power going in. So no matter how you arrange and connect a motor and generator, all you have made is a noisy, really heavy, vibrating heater that needs external power to work. Making more sense?

@@drienkm Kinda. I have no experience but I kinda understand what you are implying. The generator is not going to supply enough power to the motor. If so, then why not us 2 generator? or 3? One motor to turn all the generator to boost the power needed to run the motor. Add more generator to get enough extra power to recharge power bank. ?

@@channyma Good question. You suggest multiple generators. Maybe the motor has a long shaft (supported by bearings) with multiple wheels, each driving a generator beside the shaft. It sound like your idea came from your understanding that the power from all the generators is summed together to power the motor. That's right. The problem is that mechanical power needed out of the motor is also a sum - the mechanical power required to turn all the generators together is the sum of that required to turn each one. In this case, the shaft speed is obviously uniform along its length, but the torque in the shaft is not uniform, stepping higher at each wheel as you observe it closer and closer to the motor. This all boils down to the law of Conservation of Energy (power is just energy over time). Energy can't be created or destroyed. It just changes form. Weve talked about electrical power (voltage times current) and mechanical power (force times speed), and hinted at thermal power (rate of temperature change times mass times specific heat), but there are even more forms energy can take. It can always be quantitatively accounted for. Energy into a device ultimately exactly equals energy out, even if the energy form changes, or some enegy is stored in it for a while (like a portable device).

Sounds like a great experiment. You should make a video and post as a response. Be safe, hope you find your answer, and I look forward to your video response.

Most likely the Alternator in the FAKE demo is not connected electrically, The wires and connector block are just for show. Please don't think that the "spare line" is the secret that delivers the "magic". By removing the insides of the alternator it is easier for the small motor hidden in the big black motor to turn the belt.

LOL :)))

thats honestly the hardest part of making such a machine

By electroboom 😂

or tesla coil

Motor-Generators are nothing new either, got to really huge size in industrial settings largely phased out since solid state converters, which are very much more efficient by a huge amount thereby saving $ by a large amount too, whatever the cost of the solid state converter initially is. And huge reduction in maintenance . If Motor-Generators were 200% efficient, thats like printing money, and what industry would not be doing that if it were possible? i mean it would be profit with just that!!!. So ask yourself just how plausible is the free energy bullshit. Its far more plausible if you think its possible, that you are a absolutely stupid......

it's impossible without breaking the laws of physics themselves, you'd a material with literally 0 friction and keep the thing contained in a perfect vaccum and even then the energy inside is just part of a cycle, no new energy would be able to come out

@@romanpackham8471 But did they give us all the info at school? If yes, a flying saucer or ufo can not fly or stay stationary because there are no wings or rotors and there is no sound. Same with the incredible speed they can reach and the instantaneous disappearing or movement from one place to another 10 kilometers away. Not possible with the laws of physics as we know them. Yet these phenomena have been seen and are documented.

@@martinuso7446 ufos, unlike that nonsense, actually have science to back that up it's called the alcubierre warp drive and it basically involves compressing spacetime itself infront of you and expanding it behind you which causes spacetime to push you along it's sci-fi and needs tons of research before it can be made but it's actually got a chance of happening oh and the chance of those sightings actually being possible are either illusions or hoaxes, a warp drive would have a very distinctive mark with it visibly lensing the light around it as for the lack of sound, noise cancelling headphones use inverted frequencies to cover up the external noise so just use those if you want some quiet in atmosphere

m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pJdmmt2AtsuxoKM.html

m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pJdmmt2AtsuxoKM.html

Was there a question we can answer?

@@pstonard there are 3 questions sir and another one from yourself. Plenty of questions and often their answers are mistaken for opinions or other questions.

@@razvan-andrei-popescu528 Please clarify for those of us confused by your earlier statement, happy to answer well crafted clear questions! (Q1) ... (Q2) ... (Q3)... (Q4)... Thanks In Advance,

He is asking only stupid questions.....

@@hansjoviscroes7343 What would be the smart questions? Be specific.

Engine runs the alternator its connected. Then the alternator generates the power that will be stored in the battery.

like placing a light bulb over a solar panel and close the loop :))))

@@ELECTRONOOBS ah yes. Making influencing video just to lower people's faith on free energy machines. There's no such thing as 100% efficient machines as there's always losses. However, they can be overcame by energy creation aka overunity machines. Free energy machines are a DISTRACTION towards overunity machines which naturally have greater than 100% efficiency. It's either underunity or overunity. No such thing as unity. Ironically, overunity allows FTL. It's either under light or over light. Funny how truths are stranger than fictions. All you ever are, is an electronic engineer. You never really understood magnetism nor how it TRULY functions. Hint: They are REAL unlike what you are brainwashed with.

Why would you make this video debunking something if there wasn't something worth debunking! So what if people believe in it! Let them fail! Try all you want you will lose people are waking god is here

@@ELECTRONOOBS I believe you when you say it’s fake kinda makes sense. I’m no expert but I do have a question. If you had a batter, alternator and motor and made enough power to keep battery charged while it runs the motor wouldn’t it be possible to keep battery charged from motor and runs small appliance like charge a phone

Hallo Herr Diermeier, lesen Sie bitte mein Kommentar.

And that patents not only expire, but they don't keep ANYBODY from building something, just from profiting off it. The "patent" argument is a favorite of people who claim impossible tech.

@@SiriusJMoonlight even if this miraculous 'patent' did exist do the crazys honestly believe countries like china and india plus any developing one would pay any attention to it if this was actually possible?

@@chrisclarke6344 They have no idea at all. They come from the "I heard a thing once" school of thought.

@@SiriusJMoonlight the number who think this is possible is amazing, it appears a lot wear tinfoil hats as well.

yea, I"m surprised so many people fall for it. At least back in the 2010s and 2000s the crazy people using this technology would claim over unity or energy created out of thin air. That video claim 10kw of energy and doesn't even attempt to explain why it creates more energy than the alternator or motor.

All of you are idiots thinking free energy isn't possible. Nikola Tesla created free energy from the Earth's magnetic field, but the powers at be stopped him, of course. People like you stopped him.

yup a Stirling engine would be ideal.. trouble is the friction and losses make them so week they could not propel a generator

Plutonium maybe? It’s what they use on the mars rovers, free energy!!! (Of course, radioactivity is just a kind of very slow burning fuel, it doesn’t last forever)

@@CJCruiser thats not free energy its literally the energy emintating from the plutonium thats what radiation is, its a form of energy that the element just cannot contain and therefore it leaks out but will eventually stop, and you cant just harness the pure energy coming from the plutonium you have to get it through other means like putting it in water so the water will heat and boil and turn to steam and then turn a turbine which produces energy

@@Fisheiyy sorry, I meant for my exclamation marks to indicate sarcasm, I know what radioactivity is, I just can't for the life of me figure out what other people here think free energy is.

@@CJCruiser That's not free energy. Try the Earth's magnetic field. Everyone needs to read about Tesla's work before commenting.

The free energy is produced by the Tommyknockers.

Research gerad morin ,also iconium technology, free electricity is a reality

@@dominicgeorge7299 I looked them up. Both seem to live mainly on youtube. I did not find any links between these people and peer reviewed research or anything that actually challenges established physics. In the "2018 study" (actually just another yt video) the guy shows some basic textbook formulas and says they were "found on youtube"! This is glaring evidence of lack of education, and is pretty lethal in terms of credibility. Instead of presenting operating principles and relationship to known fundamentals, the "study" focused on just listing specific minutia and specifications of the motor and controller, in exhaustive detail. This is typical of analysis by uneducated people, or those who don't understand fundamentals. For example, the "study" focused on isolated voltage or current readings to support claims of over-unity, without discussing the thermodynamically meaningful quantities of power and energy that must be central in showing that you have created an over-unity device. Full disclosure, I spent about 10 minutes scanning his 2 hr slideshow.

@@drienkm what you see being Don is not theory it's hands on real why would you look for a theory, when it's being done and explained in your face, check iconium technology again hear what is being said the principles is explained in detail, now follow the instructions yourself, also gerad morin has brought engineers at his work shop and demonstrated his principles to wich the engineers scratch their heads and said they will have to check with more theory, there's a lot of people who don't want this knowledge to be available, I'm sorry to say that I have a feeling that you are one of those people, there is a website on internet created by gerad and bue , take a trip to Nigeria where you can see multiple houses using this technology

@@dominicgeorge7299 Well, the goal in this case is to create energy for free, right? Don't you need to know what energy is to show that you're doing that? (These people have not shown that). Nobody contests that you can make devices where some particular measurement of output is higher than the input. Devices that increase measurable things like voltage, current, torque, and rpm are common, but these are not over-unity or free energy. You have to actually understand what energy is to show that you're making it from nothing. The thing about energy is you can't really measure it directly. You have to measure its components and calculate it, but that involves basic theory. These people are not stupid, they are doing what we all do do until we learn to use the tools of prediction that established theory can provide. I tried to make a motor /generator pair run forever when I was about 8... It didn't work and now I understand why.

@@drienkm you have not and did not watch iconium technology where not only the principles was explained but a full demonstration, if you're not going to watch from beginning to end then you can't speak, please watch iconium technology where a Nigerian explains in detail then demonstrates, note that iconium technology video is not monetize, not like the free energy is faaake guy is ,he is an influencer paid to cast doubt, also I dare you to research maxwell chikumbutsu I hope I'm spelling his name right, he is from Zimbabwe 🇿🇼 and the first inventor of a television that operates on free energy, using radio waves, he has also invented an electric car that does not need charge, also an helicopter that runs on multiple fuel sources, last but not least is research the name Harlow mayne's h2 flex an inventor from Jamaica who runs his car off of water only, he sells his device for $1000 dollars, you can find his device on you tube being used by Americans, sorry but your time is up please don't be upset

There is no reason to make the FAKE contraption efficient. It is a showman's prop. Nothing more.

Basic Physics FAIL

He did also say there was a couple more things he hasn't told us about too.

He didn’t show all around the table, it would be easy to run a cable behind the TV. He makes it look like he plugs the TV into the device, but wires work both ways, the surge protector distributes power from the cable plugged into it.

"What about resonance effects?" Can you share your theory with us? What is a forward-supporting coupling? Post a PIX or video so we can learn from your science.

@@pstonard ... well ... i have no science beside the normal physics stuff ... i found the following video with useful explainations: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qciUiJpy0K6agYE.html ...

even the battery is old-fashioned, which is already replaced by the 'supercapacitor', fully charged in 2 minutes (80/85%) and can handle very large discharge currents, more than the 18650 battery.

@@oldwizzy supercapacitors have a very poor energy density.

@@VrumsAdventures Je moest eens weten hoeveel echte capaciteit ze in werkelijkheid hebben. zie onder andere > Reload station supercondensator uitgeruste faller car systeem kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jq1id8uUp6eqlJs.html oplaadtijd 1 minuut, rij tijd ruim 10 minuten, moet je eens met Li-on accu's doen qua opladen, dan ben je UREN bezig met opladen, wat dat betreft heb JIJ nog heel wat bij te leren, energie dummie.

Only free energy is from sun, wind, hydro, etc forces... Its free and doesn't violate energy laws

@@oldwizzy the energy (in Joules) in a capacitor is the half the capacitance times the voltage squared. Let's take a standard 100F supercap which roughly has the same volume as an 18650 cell (18 mm diameter and 65 mm length for the 18650 Li-Ion and 22 mm diameter and 47 mm length for the supercap). At 3.7V the energy in a standard 3Ah Li Ion cell is 11.1Wh. The supercap is a 2.7V rated one, so a 100F one can hold 364.5J of energy... that's a little bit over 0.1Wh, 111 times less than a similarly sized 18650 cell on average. And this is a high end supercap. Yes there are advantages to SuperCaps, but energy density is not (yet) one of them... and there are some new supercaps that are hibrids between a supercap and a li-ion battery, those are even more niche and still at 10x the energy density are an order of magnitude less dense than li-ion batteries.

I don't know It they delete the good comments from the comment section, but on those videos pretty much everyone agrees with that fake project...

@@ELECTRONOOBS Oh yes ...it's hilarious and that makes me think why almost all comments "buy" into the "free energy" idiocy. i wonder also if someone is not erasing the other rational and knowlegable comments alerting for the scam.

To ciekawe jak masz agregat prądotwórczy

too bad he is wrong.

All the rules and conversions bring you to the state determined only by them. There are still states that no one has measured or calculated yet, but using the frame you will never get to them.

@@MsWaldx laws that in uni.v. cannot be broken much like #1 e-mc2 thermodynamics 1st law energy cannot be created or destroyed IE. E-MC2 those are laws that cannot be broken .

I'm with you 💯% and I'll try it. I don't know why he forgot all induction dynamos produce DC energy which all rotors in any generator produce DC which produce electromagnetic in it (N/S). When the electromagnetic force is produced in the rotor and rotate around either copper or aluminum coil the AC must be generated. Winds up, neodymium magnets is used in a rotor to replace the electromagnetic. So the magnetic field is produced, nothing could stop the generating of AC when the rotor is rotating. He forgot that it's a low rpm alternator, it doesn't required 2800-3600 rpm. A simple experiment (Put the wires of your induction motor in your mouth and rotate it's rotor, you will fell the charge in your mouth) the highere the speed the highere of the the charge and vice versa. It's not face.

BS!

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qciUiJpy0K6agYE.html

Your points of criticism e.g. No 4 tell us you just don't understand the first thing about electric motors or physics. The fundamental understanding of anyone who does, is that *_by definition_* if you create a setup where a generator powers a motor that drives that generator _you have created a perpetual motion machine._ Also your patronising second point no 4 (that should have been labelled 6 I presume) indicates that you think a foreign accent means lack of "command" of English. I think he spoke well and articulately and if you can't hear past the accent then shame on you. Also, just by the way: the original video that you refer to is all narrated in text. How does that demonstrate a "better command of English"? If they put all this video's spoken information into closed captions would that impress you more?

@Peter Türr Yeah either Google translate is having a meltdown or you just wrote 199 words of meaningless technobabble. I'll leave it up to the student to work out which "as an exercise." Sure, scientists don't know what they are talking about because they only work in theory. Of course, they haven't ever reproduced the experiment. Because that's exactly how science works, right? Yaaaah.

no not sick they are entertaining and fun to watch. oh and also make one think a little outside the box.

What content ? Using irrelevant arguments to denounce something unrelated si as fake as it gets.

Jews...

Doesn't matter. Just swap the cables...

How much is ALOT? Can you share some maths or measurements to your claims?

I love a lot of energy in my power walls !!!

Why would you do that? Please don't stop dreaming about braking 'some law'. Let's call it visioneering, which might lead to pioneering. Just know when you are dreaming

In order for the laws of "thermodynamics" to apply you would have to incorporate something that generates energy from a heat source. Dumba$$ don't even understand the term "thermo" but want to open their mouths like they know something. 🤦‍♂️

Surely, you jest...??

So let me get this straight, dude debunks a product by building something completely different and spouting off theories that are not applicable.

Thanks Todd, I will add to your clever comment here and repeat what I said above. It is real. The Liberty Engine is the level of Tesla technology in the 21st century, created by someone with an open mind and the balls to show and share it with the world. He wants more people to know about it, but is afraid the government will fuck him and kill him if he does, like what happened to Tesla and many others who tried to publicize and commercialize similar inventions. There is apparently another piece of the puzzle which he doesn't reveal because he is justifiably afraid of the government coming after him, and I would be too if I were in his position demonstrating a scientific breakthrough/discovery to the world, and as Tesla also was hesitant to go public with his invention, especially after receiving a number of threats. Anyone who urges that it is fake is either a naive, cynical close-minded idiot, competitor, working for a power company, is a member of a branch organization of the asshole "illuminatis", or is simply a disgusting reptilian alien being working undercover, as usual, as they are not allowed to blow their own cover. And the people who are going to reply to my comment here, you will be able to tell what kind of person it is based on what they say. Pay close attention. You are smarter - and more spiritual - than you know. Anyway, I don't know about more energy being put out than put in (he may have some secret to that that he's afraid to reveal to the public because of what happened to Tesla and others for trying to do the same), BUT it makes sense to me that if you design/tweak a motor to have the same amount of friction and level of efficiency when rotating as the alternator connected to it (with the help of a little magic of strong coil + powerful magnets), the power assigned and transferred to the motor from the alternator would be the same amount of power returned to the alternator by the motor, hence an infinitely, autonomously running, free energy machine (after you give it the initial starting energy or 'jump start'). Where the hell is the doubt in that??

No, sorry it won't work. A transformer can step up or step down VOLTAGE (or CURRENT) but a transformer can NOT step up or step down POWER. Please do your own research on something this basic.

No