Honestly I think she was sick here.

@@thedavephan you should be ashamed of yourself, what a disgusting comments

She has said many times that her mother always advised her to “be a lady” really meaning to stay calm, breathe, think about the words your saying and speak slow in a clam respectful manner. That’s why she speaks the way she does. She thinks before she speaks

@@factsonly4124 her overwhelming obsession with gender has shown that while she is measured, she is also misguided

Yeah it seems in general in the 90s people spoke way slower than now

Selective speaking is what politicians do. Like snakes.

She was an evil person who was pro the mass murder of children in abortion over 60 million people killed in the US alone let us hope she repented before she met her maker

Something surely both sides can agree on.

Better times cause complacency. Only now as things get worse and worse and we have to deal with the results of past actions people are starting to factionalize.

The Democrats are only civilized when they see their puppets perform. See the confirmation hearings of Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas, before this one of Bader Ginsburg.

yes and i noticed they said at the end that they implemented a closed meeting to go over any personal allegations... did they get rid of that for Kavanaugh? because the only reason we had his public meeting about allegations was because the press found out.

Diana Palacios I think this is how confirmation hearings are supposed to go. I am not sure what we are watching with this new dude they are trying to hire😁

Yes.

yes : [

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aJ6Ue8V6t8Wycmg.html Trailer about some a movie about her life

I loved the way she thought tbh. She was so straightforward and to the point, but like so earnest at the same time.

Kinda reminds me of Mr. Rogers.. the way she talk so polite and thoughtful..

@Carl Carl 👍

Too deep we are faling asleep waiting for the next word. lol

And the bipartisanship of the republicans. Can you tell me how many democrats have voted for a republican nominee? If you don't know, I'll tell you. ZERO!!!!!!

RIP

YesYou 123333 of the nominees not accused of sexual misconduct? Yeah, that may be tough for bipartisanship support.

@ERIC MALTSER Hahahahahaha Scalia was over 30 years ago. LOL And there were 35 Nays against Alito. So, you're FULL OF SHIT.

@@HarrisonHollers Yeah, ACCUSED is the key word here.

I like that about her too!

Not a single one wasted indeed...

Just the ones in her head as why all the pauses.

She’s reading off of a scripted prepared statement...it’s right in front of her. Watch the video again....sheesh

@@BlackJack4968 ALL the Supreme Court nominees have references to which they quote or refer when answering specific court cases. Now, go to bed!

Big Patio... Just shows the dementia started early

She can't even hold her head up anymore.

Coming up in the American legal system the way she did she couldn’t afford to waste her words, every single one has thought behind it and meaning. Men still don’t let women get their thoughts out before complaining about them, imagine what it was like in the 60s and 70s in a field where women were simply not welcome. “Nevertheless she persisted.”

@@staceyseik5603 She opined that the age of consent should be 12 years old.

@@MovieMaker2100 In what case, article or interview did she say this?

I like beer

BeefPapa I like beer back then , sometimes I drank too much , I still like beer ,do you like beer ? 😭my dad kept a calendar so I did too

I hope she is able to continue pass 2020. She is a national treasure.

JodySoul almost did, 3 months shy.

KeveneveK Palindrome ahhh ok I see .... your a special kind of ass who doesn’t care if something constitutionally allowed and or fought for if it does t agree with your politics . And everyone who does follow and agree with the constitution should be dead.... ok champ you’re a brave one for sure

Take pre law classes! You won’t regret it!

And specifically any legal reasoning / philosophy of law class

Like intro to legal proceedings or something?

Defly Plaise that could be good, sounds like it’s procedure based so it’ll probably be teach you about how things go down in a lawsuit. If you want to learn about interpreting the law itself though, you need substantive courses. I took classes called civil liberties, civil rights and constitutional law in my undergrad and i learned all about the supreme court decisions. If you can find out whether any of the classes require you to “brief cases”, definitely take those!

Without going on about how much she likes to drink. Imagine that.

Kay Muldoon she was never asked about her drinking nor did it become an issue in her hearings. You think Kavanaugh wanted to talk about it?

@@kaymuldoon3575 Yes, she said she drank before the SOTU that's why she was dozing off. Is she and Nancy Pelosi twins?

Me

Stop using a woman's death for likes on KZfaq

JusticeAA yummy 😋

Me

JusticeAA: No. RBG fought for *the right to make the decision* about whether or not to bear a child. She did not make those decisions. Your statement is the exact opposite of what is true. You did not listen to her. She did not believe others should decide for women!

thepositivelynegativ Hah, hell would freeze over if a nominee received that vote. Justice Scalia was unanimously confirmed in 1986. I pray that our "elected" officials will eventually grow up. Learn to compromise, and not pitch fits.

You had Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas, Souter(at the time thought he was a conservative), Kennedy, O'Connor all conservative, nominated by Republican. Of COURSE the Senate was giving Ginsburg an easy PASS.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aJ6Ue8V6t8Wycmg.html

Still all about ABORTION. Big money maker for Attorneys, and the minority crowd who choose sane sex to buy a baby ie adopt so to speak. Sickening is what it is. My 1st Amendment rights of Free Speech and Freedom of Religion.

Never with a Republican appointee. Wait till Ginsburg gets replaced..fireworks.

no

nope! that's why we are all here lol

I'll give you that...at this time anyway. However Amy Coney Barrett's day has arisen and I have no doubt, especially after the hearing that she too will be right up there along side of the amazing Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Scalia was quite legendary.

Oliver Wendell Holmes changed the legal practice too. But RBG was definitely one for the people, and that's soooo rare in the ivory tower of supreme courts

@@mommaof4boys700Ever since her confirmation hearing when she failed to even CLOSELY enumerate the rights guaranteed under the 1st Amendment, I can’t take her seriously I’m afraid. I mean she is a professor of law and can’t do that???

this was only 27 years ago but i agree with your sentiment

50 yrs ago would be a black & white video.

Of course, as with any American politics.

ACB is also careful with words. Her higher IQ allows her to speak without pauses or notes. .

@@austrobok2958 it took me a while to figure out who ACB was haha. She's too new to gauge. Quick to listen slow to speak my friend.

If you say so. Most see her as a traitor. Tells other countries not to adopt our constitution

VAJRAMINDMICHELE.... Called major dementia

Damn, you're stupid.

VAJRAMINDMICHELE Too much brilliance = thinking outside the box on your own.. That is for inventors and scientists..Not for supreme court justices. There job is and should be to adhere to the constitution 100 percent!!!

gina greco-- A brilliant mind is what I meant---not sure what you are referring to but you go-ahead with whatever, c'est la vie!

and. yet completely sensible, down-to-earth and quintessentially American. So refreshing to listen to this.

rechts ist göttlich why lol

Anthony Richardson could not have said better ⭐️

rechts ist göttlich walk away your tiny little opinion is discarded.

I think it’s her thinking through everything to say it in the best way. Either that or she’s really tired

Still relieved?

@@bubblesbubbles3415 I just realised I may have phrased that wrong. I don't mean I am relieved she speaks this way, I am relieved it was not due to her age.

Legal minds are often trained to talk slowly- to ensure that their utterances are refined to the highest degree. Note how she does not umm and ahh

I would imagine that she didn't speak this way off the record

+Jako32 : Are you a Jew? She has done so much to push the Zio agenda, ruining our once-great country

UniversityOf Truth you're an idiot. How about to post a comment that makes sense. Pleas explain the logic behind your pathetic comment.

Brad1156 Have some decency, man.

Adam Byrnes I don’t particularly like her either but everyone does deserve sympathy.

@Brad1156 abortion is great

And the hearings now ... 🤦🏽‍♀️

@Bruce Wade thanks Bruce 💗

What is so special about baby killers and supporters of infanticide?

Yes because killing babies is so the right side of history.

Dylan Orr yep I just watched Scalia confirmation and he was doing it back then.

Dinasaur

Biden has him beat. Biden has been in almost 48 years now. Grassley has only been in since 1980, Biden since 1973.

Kevin Burke doing what?

He's old as dirt.

Please do Ruth, please do, we need a justice who uses law instead of feelings to come to decisions. Theres now way shes going to make it 6 more years.

No Retire. She can't hold her head up and she stay awake. Just retire.

Yes, do. Her and a few others. Then it will really be a TRUMP COURT!

MisterGreenGuy We do not need a conservative in the supreme court, especially one of trumps picking. The way the world is heading, we need an open look on all laws and cases, not a narrow view

knock knock knocking on heavens door

Shes an idiot who cant even remember the 14th amendment, confessed to cheating in college and was clueless to law during these proceedings. She uses feeling instead of law to make her decisions. She should have NEVER been on the court. Not much longer and Trump can replace her too.

Good luck with trump replacing her anytime soon. And who has not cheated in college tell me you are sooo smart never had to cheat? I’m not saying that she did cheated or not and that it might be okay just taking an assumption to your comment. Look at the Kavanaugh nomination he “sexually assault” a women at least not as bad as that don’t you think.

So much for due process, evidence and truth huh ? Then again this buffoon sees nothing wrong with everyone in college cheating.. wtf. Praising a judge while celebrating cheating and dishonesty .. Amazing. Behold the intellect and integrity of a typical NPC. Filled with state sponsored horseshit to his brim.

@Roy Earle No one promotes abortion you nincompoop. Just the right. What percentage of pro choice women actually go through an abortion?

Well, it's actually to be debated, in a fun light-hearted way, if we were to generalize, in modern times, well? If there was a generalized difference in "needs" or "loss"?? Who should have the greater benefits on losing a spouse? Men? Or women?? Who has lost more & so needs more benefits? Husband's? Or wives?!

Rhino Repossessed my Fax Machine hahahahaha

Lmao dead

Have you always been an idiot Rhino???

Bahahahaha!!!!!! I know she has always hated the American Constitution. She is so Respectable that it is Embarrassing to the Country that she has such a Disrespect for Kavanugh at his Swearing in Ceremony..

@ Beau Morris Have you just decided that you're going to just start whatever words you feel like with a capital letter instead of following the rules of proper English?

Don't worry, Trump will find a worthy replacement.

she is an ignoramus and a radical leftist who ran the ACLU

+Jon Spinelli kicks ass in her dreams you mean right ? cuz man o man is she a snoozer lmaoo

She will be exposed. EVIL

Look into her beliefs in the 70's. She is perverted

Steven Hunter can’t wait for her to be gone so a patriotic American can get that seat back. MAGA!!

Shes a fraud and soon dead. Replaced with gun loving conservative. I cant wait!

@John Days absolutely lol and they hate it.

Her refusal to give opinion or 'forecast' on judicial issues is good and wise, especially give the criticism with which she is faced.

Because she was 61 then.

jmua04 and you don’t look a day over 108.

lol

@@slytherin3034 60*

Bc Republicans know their base ain't the readin type so they spew bullshit and the base runs with it

Now, it ain't about real view points of nominee's, or qualifications, it's about the corruption brought by Republicans to "reshape" the courts with Republican judges. Barrett was their girl. Sides with corporate over worker majority. On abortion, gay marriage and healthcare, she was the one.

the hearings take place over many days

Fuhq Boi I’m not offended

Spoken like a true communist.

It’s not a form of birth control. It’s a last resort for people who make mistakes, are assaulted, and whose birth control failed. It’s not a fun experience. Insinuating that women go and do this a few times a year rather than taking a pill or insisting male partners use a condom is ridiculous.

Did you actually watch the entirety of the hearing for ACB? Not just snippets/highlights. If so, if you came to it with an open mind, then you would understand why she did not answer many questions about active cases, did not grade precedent, did not share personal stances on issues, etc. There are ethics rules and tradition for judges to not do that. It’s been the case for every judicial nominee to not answer those, not just ACB. Her personal feelings about cases are irrelevant to her position as a judge. Judges are suppose to be impartial, have an open mind, and go through the judicial process in order to decide a case. To do otherwise would be judicial activism. Activists on the court are not good. If she did answer with her personal feelings then any litigator could use that as an argument for why she isn’t fit to hear their specific case, they could argue that previous cases were incorrectly/unfairly decided, etc.

Nobody behaved like Kamala Harris and Booker back then.

Yep, and now he’s running for President 8 years later after you made your comment...

@@harperburgess9769 I thought that he said that he was running for the US Senate. Right after that he said "If you don't like me vote for the other Biden". At least that is what he said earlier this year. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jdeDZ9BenaiYeYU.html

She doesn't have the interest of unborn humans does she.

Oh Gawd who gives a rats ass Atheist here you have no standings with me and your Unborn human crap you can keep to ya self

The RightStuff You're an idiot. I see it all the time conservatives name calling and degrading liberals. So who the hell cares if liberals do it. Both political sides resort to name calling it's been like that since the beginning of time.

HigherPhoto I guess neither did the mostly republican judges who sat on the Supreme Court and voted for the abortion right.

I doubt a real angel would support abortion