indeed she is, I absolutely love her.

I love her. Going around looking for Martinis, saying that everyone in Britain is drunk all the time and so on😂 Don't know if you've seen it, but in one interview with Mindy Kaling (for Late Night) they read out reviews to each other and had to guess the movie. Mindy read: 'Emma Thompson is totally wasted in this movie' And Emma: Meaning that I'm absolutely all filled all the way through? Of course it meant she wasn't used well, but I simply LOVE the thought😂😂

Definitely ❤

Yessssss

did you kiss him by any chance? lol

@@katherinetrimble3086 wouldn't we all? ❤️

Oh yes

Emily K ....it’s called the “lesbian hitler”

Billy Nomatz ha ha ha!

@@billynomatz9233 I wish 😍🤣

@@billynomatz9233 😂😂😂😂😂

@@jenniferh3827 same here😭❤

Not half as much as she loves herself !!!

Yes 😍

What's not to love about her.

Yes,it's British, many of us British people have it. 😉

well you would, given you’re family.. (jk)

sarahwithstars yes,she even shocks herself with how wonderful she is...but not often !!!

Seriously. Sounds the the intro chord progression to 'Saturday In The Park' over and over.

Also, have you seen the chemistry between she and Ellen? 🤞🏻 that she's bisexual. Maybe that's why she didn't answer the last Q, because she's been crushing on a gal.

Damn, Nancy Drew

@@segamai haha i am when it comes to Emma!

Aaditya Srivastav the likes were from her !!!

cardy carrying :))

@@ginbo33 can you please translate for a non-native speaker? I feel like I am missing the gist here...

@@apphilosophy79 im not a native speaker either, but if im correct it is a phrase meaning she belongs to that club, it refers to the fact that people can be card carrying members of clubs :) and they use this expression to different things like feminism 😊😊

@@ginbo33 Thank you! Now I got it! (the other option would have been quite sassy and G-rated...)

@@apphilosophy79 Yes, not just "belonging to the club" but having the card to show for it... and proud of it.

Just because men do more physical jobs doesn’t mean that sexism doesn’t exist…

@@ceebee2 Yeah, sexism exist but feminists are hypocrites. That's what he was saying.

She denied that in this video.

debishmac she did it metro.co.uk/2019/09/26/emma-thompson-admits-hypocritical-fly-5400-miles-climate-change-protest-10812405/

I agree. It's really hard to know based on the little information given. It's also possible that less women want to be in show biz. That, again, is really hard to measure.

I think you're reading way too much in a simple statement and putting words Emma never said in her mouth. A 88% male set is most likely related to sexism; the same way a kindergarden with 88% female staff is ALSO due to sexism. She wasn't commenting on how that could be fixed, she just observed that it exists. In an ideal world where gender differences were bodily differences and nothing else, that imbalance would probably not be quite as big, even if still not 50x50.

There are circumstances where the people in the room are not the best and just the default some examples: Stephen Colbert once said even when he requested diversity in his writer's room, there were 8 women out of 150 in the candidate list given to him. He had to impose his own quota to just be able to see their work, he was then given 87 women to choose from. When people get called out for having a lack of women a common excuse is we couldn't find any, a UK campaigner Caroline Criado Perez responded to that once when a program used 2 male guests to discuss periods and then the next day had another 2 males on to discuss breast exams, she found hundreds of female medical professionals in half an hr who were willing to be interviewed. Myself, once I was involved in a marketing campaign that was going to be used in a very multicultural area and so we asked for diversity in the models 10 white blonde women were what we were given. There's an added problem in Hollywood because of agents and the quoting system they use for pay negotiations. A bit of a catch-22 where agents get 10% and men earn more so the agents push more to get their men in the role, men therefore get more offers to negotiate giving them more quotes that they use to prove their worth and negotiate higher pay next time. I get why people don't like quotas but the systems in place at the moment aren't all meritocracies.

I've worked in film & TV for 30 years and actively worked to get more women - especially directors - on set. The truth is the work doesn't appeal to a lot of women. First, because the hours simply don't work for anyone with children. But also the hours are necessarily long and hard, and the conditions are often terrible. You're out in all weather, often drenched to the skin or freezing, often (especially on low-budget productions) with only the most basic facilities. A lot of men don't want to work under those conditions. But three times as many women don't. And 90% of the female directors I've worked with will lobby hard for a job, train hard, then do two or three gigs before retreating to theatre, advertising, production, or some other area with sensible hours and no great hardships.

@@ozvoyager There are plenty of actresses that seem to work fine in those conditions. Why not women in other areas? Besides, if there are fewer women on these jobs, then any who are by default are more noticeable (you would pay more attention to what they do or don't). A man quitting because of his family is not a big deal when there are 80 of them on a set, but a woman, when there are 3 others, is. Besides, another gender stereotype that might contribute is the idea that women are more responsible for the children. Why mothers give up on their work for their kids more often than fathers do? I think any reasonable person understands how that is most likely related to sexism.

Hahaha. Why have you come here to write numerous negative comments about our wonderful beautiful intelligent sexy amazing charismatic lovely Emma.

oh, shut up and complain to someone who wants to hear it.

it kinda is though, women are discouraged to pressue certain jobs and so are men. In heavy physical labor it makes sense, but often it is simply done out of an inheret bias that has nothing to do with the actuall abilities or someone and where there is no real link to their gender. Programming had been a female dominated job, now the bias is women can't be competend at technologie and should not be interessted in it. Men are distrusted when it comes taking care of children, parents at times outright getting agressiv towords male kindergardners! Women at the other hand get encouraged from a young age to nuture . . . that inequaliy in taken job comes only down to personal preference is plain wrong.

@@SingingSealRiana Nonsense for a few decades now. Who is "discouraging" ? And why does that matter if an individual were discouraging. I've been discouraged from attempting certain things throughout my whole life. I just don't let them affect MY choices. In schools girls have not been encouraged to nurture for 3 decades now. On the contrary, it has become socially encouraged not to worry about having children in the west. But again. You have your own mind. It would be a different matter if there were legal obstacles. Then I would stand with you against them. My personal experience with engineer minded women among men, is that they were warmly received. And because I never witnessed any discouragement there I can't cite that as a factor, but knowing all the people I would best guess that if a man started to "bully" or belittle the woman, those chaps I worked with and knew well would take that "bully" aside and give them a serious talking to for upsetting the work environment they were enjoying and their respect for Ms X. I would have to. The last 12-15 years as far as I can make out has seen not a celebration of more opportunities, but a reversal in thinking to push the agenda of victimhood. I say, it is they who are doing more damage and undoing how well things have moved forward. One can call it "hatred of the good for being the good" if you like. It's disgusting.

@@Avidcomp in what kind of fantasy world do you live?

@@SingingSealRiana I do not live in a fantasy. I did convey to you first hand experiences. Makes you think about the kind of people, others hang around with. Care to share your experiences?