thkiwi1 lmao 😂😂😃

".--...- .- ...---..." where the last words of Eugene, may he rest in peace.

Very funny.

Ahahaha😂😂😂

Telegraph pole-LOL

They were almost weaker cars in 1900s

alot*

Whats funny is that this continu

You mean F1

@@masterhybrid16 I mean racing and car manufacturing has coincided since the very begging. so any safety features that seem effective for mass use are applied to street cars after being polished and engineered in motor sport

Breaks the spokes! Oh damn! Can't fix that.

Cars got a lot more fragile in the last decades because of planned obsolescence, weight savings and roads got smoother so there isn't a need to build them as though. The passenger compartment is a hard shell but everything around it is paper thin.

@@blackdeck9112 not planned obselecense ...its energy absorption the cars disintegrating is a good thing..you dont want it to remain solid

@@Lexrolla-1 Yeah crumple zones and strong passenger compartments are great but I'm referring to overall durability and build quality. For example on old Volvos the front bumper is mounted on dampers which will absorb light impacts and return to to their primal form. On every modern car the bumper/crash bar mounts are designed to absorb the energy bu crumpling so that even after light impacts you will be forced to replace them. Another thing are sway bar links. They used to have rubber bushings which you could tighten as they wore out. These could easily last over a decade before needing replacement. Modern sway bar links use ball joints which are a lot more fragile, wear out quicker and are a lot more expansive to replace. Some of them are even made out of plastic. I've seen them break after only one year of driving. Also they are often mounted to the strut tower instead of the controll arm like on the old design. This way everytime you want to change your tower bearing, dampers or springs you have to undo the bolt the sway bar links. But the way they are designed you often have to cut them and replace them even if they weren't all that worn out. There are many more examples like these. Sorry my english is not all that great when it comes to car parts names i hope what i wrote made sense.

Basically If you drive your avarage 80's mobile and a 2010's car over an infinite straight bumpy rough terrain road, the 2010's car will break down much sooner and will be much more expensive and difficult to fix. That said I'd much more prefer to be in a modern car during a high speed frontal crash.

At least he survived

Did it look cool at least?

@@cheesemanthe2ndbruh

@@Falcon-Plays trying to think on the bright side

may be..

There will simply be no crashes, all cars will be electric and are connected up to the central traffic system that controls autopilot.

@@Tomoslb1 but still, shit will happen, it's obvious

@@Tomoslb1 You misunderstood the comment

@@Tomoslb1 I have seen computers screw up too many times to trust a computer with my car. Then again, the computers do really well when you don't install Microsoft.

We die like real men! Being compressed beyond recognition of course

As it should be

Back when they did not have seat belts.

10 percent on a good day

Yeah but also nobody was moving very fast in those days. But yes they 100% were beautiful looking death traps

who said they came out alive ?

@@ralphv924 Nobody said anything. One just hopes that his fellow man might survive his misfortunes.

Eyah,in old days ppls are more stronger:)

@@Alex462047 well I hope so to, anyway, al driver's from those days are gone. So we will never know.

none of these are fatal

Lmao I was thinking the same thing

Touché my friend....good one.

lmao nice

I don’t think drinking and driving was illegal in those days

And all 5 occupants died of horrible head and upper body trauma.

The occupants were the crumple zones...

I'd still rather drive one of them than a modern car.

people usually fly out of the car

and with the plate glass, were shredded.

@@rockstarltu yep why they have shattered glass now

Lmfaoo

may day says the biggest sicko

Why not?Horses dont haveTC:)

@PHOENIX RISING lmfao

Flat horse legs, missing eyes

A sealed envelope, more like...

I dont think anybody was inside, looks like a tree fell ontop of it when it was parked

Jon Mitchell yeah I know right

Столбик упал на крышу немножко...

There was no people inside

👍👍👍👍😅

WE ARE FARMERS DUM-DADUM-DUM-DUM DUM DUM

But i was there and dont say anything when i dont know nothing.

Yup

Next Video: Tractors in a ditch, courtesy of Farmer’s.

Most go flying....

The ones who survived were handicap for the rest of there own life

But many of those cars were probably repaired & went on.

Oh, they walked, er, uh, limped away with horrendous, crippling, life altering injuries.

@Discofelsi The knob on the steering column went through their sternums and poked holes in their hearts. Safety first! Was not their motto!

Talking*

Dude that never crossrd my mind. Very funnny!

Hahahahaha

Yes!

Telegram from my crush! Oh shit! *CRASH*

XD

@@melvinharris7859 This is the 20's

Was about to make this joke until it came to mind that boomers didnt exist at this time

@@merde7300 they could also be from the 1910s/1900s. Definetely not in the 1930s or 40s. Cars changes so much

@@doozy5920 The video features cars from the mid 1910s up to the early 1930s

The whole point of their video is to turn automobiles into a joke in the 1910s, 1920s, and 1930s. Listen to all the goddamn comments. It's like 600,000 all saying their favorite color is red, over an over again. No difference in the comments.

Don't forget wood spoke wheels as well. As you can see some cars literally had one of their wheels snap off due to rotted wood.

If you were lucky you got electric headlights. Many cars of this vintage still had gas lanterns. You're right many cars had mechanical brakes which didn't work all that well they were also very often only on the rear wheels. Most high schoolers can tell you what happens when you only use rear brakes (parking brake). Lot's of sliding all over the place.

David Wildridge they still are beautifull! 😍😍 if you imagine built them now, a bit more light, brakes and a bit stronger chassis and wheels The world would be a much better place Safer to walk around, less pushing against time..

@@Seune205 The world we live in is influenced by the mentality of the people living in it, not the stuff they make. You could renovate one of these cars to modern standards and people would still scream around like headless chooks, poor Schumacher wannabes. You'd have to change the general mentality first. Good luck with that - more powerful people than you or I are pulling those strings.

no matter ^^^lol ^^ today is nothing better , to much idiots on streets

Thank you very much for the very interesting notes about the rollover of the Krietzman's truck !

Next time i lose controll and can't avoid a tree i'l be sure to tell me car he can't. Thank you for looking out for us Sam! Very cool!

@@Mr_Fancypants one does one s best .Avoid woods , forests parks and tree museums , if they exist .Trees are not our friends .

True. I tow. I can't tell you how many fatalities I've been to where it was car or even truck vs tree. The tree always wins 100%. Even a small tree with like 8" diameter. I've seen these small diameter trees split cars in two. Larger trees .... well you can imagine. A big fat pole will snap before a tree does.

Sam Sum Thanks, Mr. Obvious!

@@thevaughnshow Not for you then , mister knowall .

And rich sons and ricers and women...

And ditches

@@glifwsatti "grr woman bad haha woman no drive" let me guess, you are a 40 year old facebook user?

Yup, this is why when somebody says that cars were built better back in the day, they're full of shit.

GreenJeep1998 the build quality has nothing to do with how well a car holds up in a accident, build quality is how well a car holds up as well as the overall quality of fit and finish. Despite the great simplicity that made these cars easy to work on the we’re not safe because it wouldn’t be until the late fifties until people started to testing them in crash test and it would not be until the mid to late seventies until car companies really started to follow them. The quality of a car especially a classic has nothing to do with how well it can hold up in a crash.

@@HighSockDavid Considering the phrase I typed in usually is proceded by a picture of late model car that deformed and/or had parts shear off in a wreck to protect the buckled in occupants vs utter destruction that these pictures show, you may have missed my point.

GreenJeep1998 by back in the day they mean 50s and 60s

Grey Miller they had frames mad out of wood and were basically horseless carriages

Old cars back then were much faster than their handling or braking could cope with. American cars in the 20s could hit 70-80 mph or more no air bags, no seat belts, and a steering column just waiting to devastate your internal organs!

@@dormantsuperhero Very few could go 70-80, and most of the ones pictured were touring cars and Model T's. They certainly couldn't.

@@ed9492 40 is still damn fast for the supporting tech of the 20s

Not all, certainly, but many could, the larger cars were easily capable of the speeds mentioned. Please research for example, the Dodge victory six, Studebaker dictator, and commander etc, all renowned for their speed. The dodge victory was a favourite of the police simply because of its speed. Be my guest all of you doubters, go do your research. I've owned quite a few vintage cars of the type shown here........ just saying.

@@dormantsuperhero My 1930 Marquette -- the lowest-end Buick-built model, with just a '28-vintage sidevalve six -- nevertheless had a high HP-to-weight ratio and did a remarkable 70MPH in the flying quarter-mile.

@Discofelsi ikr

We learned how to crash in dumber ways

@Discofelsi shorter is better ^^ they never learn how to be like a professional , but be sure themselfs crashed in races too . Driving schools are only there to show you how to operate the car, you have to learn to drive yourself

well... we have a lot better tow trucks!

WTH? Monocoque chassis with passive restraints, crumple zones, air bags, antilock disc brakes, traction control, seat belts with auto tensioning, collision avoidance, safety glass...need I go on? Fewer accidents per capita, fewer deaths & injuries. Safer roads, bridges & barriers. Maybe you just didn't learn anything?

Home slice, I don’t think seatbelts would have made a difference in most of these crashed.

@@dawsonroth5832 Indeed, quite a few fatalities and injuries had to do with the flimsy bodies of the cars. Also, crumple zones in modern cars save a lot of people too. Back then the passengers were the crumple zone.

would be great !

I’d like to know the song as well... anybody know?

@Nxthan “Cinderella Blues” by Jesse Stafford and His Orchestra

OffdaRoots lmao

Yeah

psiho buderbala frend never

Русский)!)

Ricer

*_Nah I don't like the fact that you have no privacy and everyone could see you inside the car._*

Yup, and we could afford them.

white Your comment doesn’t make any sense. If you were drunk when you made it, no problem.

Best cars were made between 1960 and 1995

TransAmDrifter PL Best cars in what?Design, Safety, Economy, Quality? If it goes to design, that’s subjective but this time period created some incredibly beautiful cars. But safety or horrible and they aren’t economic either, maybe quality is better in some parts but it’s usually quite bad, only thing is that they have less parts that can break

"H A M M O N D ! ! ! !" "what?" "EVERYWHERE WE GO YOU STILL MANAGE TO CRASH!!!!!"

@Green Mamba Games yea I guess, but just think about owning one of those , they could have been the best part of a car collection of just be someone's pride and joy. Good point tho👍

Haha! Spot on

😂😂

Really there was tow trucks I dont recall seeing them

Thank you !

The suspension in road cars was so bad the tires would be a little problem if you were about to crash.

GinsengStrip2002 True, slightly better than stage coach suspension technology.

*Sad 1900s drifty boi sounds*

Toyota Mark II 1900 version

Rare picture of the begginings of the e36 boys

1st concept of 3 series touring.

Deja vu

Henry Ford developed Duplex glass (laminated) for the model A because one of his engineers and friend went through a windshield and was badly hurt,

On the contrary, it wasn't quite until the late 30's cara began to be made of thicker metal. These early models were held together with a combination of wood and tin sadly! A touch of aluminum or cast iron here or there. But for the most part? They were mainly made like horse carriages.

Check out the vid of the 59 impala hitting a late model (2013-2014 ) impala ... Absolutely staggering , the outcome.

@@MrTheHillfolk they found that one in a junk yard though; if its all rusted out with no engine like the one they got was, them of course it'll crumble easier

@@MrTheHillfolk they should of took a big 1970s boat like my car the frame stretches all the way to the bumper that probably would have destroyed the new car

@PHOENIX RISING Exactly. Feel bad for that poor '59 and I ain't even a Malibu guy, always preferred the Fleetline but that's neither here nor there. Personally I think if we combined old with new (an actual steel/solid metal car plus the trillions of safety features in modern cars), we'd have a practically bullet proof car (minus the computer crap of course). But, GM would never do that. There's more of a profit in cheap plastic crap than actual US steel unfortunately.

20 down hill with a tail wind

@@scottrussell6717 🤣

Believe me , crash into a tree at over 30 mph and its lights out forever .A tree doesn t give way . A hurricane maybe , but a car , extremely very rarely .