Do you want this one komrade

All depends on is if the growlers are out or not.

Absolutely, we all watched as an Israeli missile destroyed "Pantsir" 'operated by a careless Syrian crew who just wanted to go smoke, they turned off "Pantsir"' and went to smoke. for such actions in the Russian army, this crew would have been fired on the same day. Moreover, this crew would have received harsh punishment for violating the military regulations in a combat situation. This is what distinguishes banana republics from great armies, no matter if it is the army of the United States, Russia or China.

Another S-300 was destroyed yesterday, S-300 cost: 115 million dollars, missile that destroys it 50-100 thousand dollars. All world knows now that Russian weapons only work on Russian TV (like here), they don't work in real combat. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8dld7t-36mseYk.html

@@MidwestDIY They havent destroyed a single S300 system but only parts of the system. Either launcher (heavely damaged) controllstation or the radar, not an ENTIRE system. All these "destroyed" subsystems are easy to replace and damaged systems can be repared. You clearly has No knowledge about these systems

@@MidwestDIY clearly a single missile did not destroy an entire s300 system costing 115 million dollars, unless it was nuclear. Russia has very capable missile technology, it is quite obvious and has been shown time and time again. They have the best aa systems in the world, there is no competitors. The closest systems are from America like the patriot, which has had a lot of its own issues, is way more expensive and on paper much less capable. There are a lot of factors that go into play, one of them is the fact that it is not wartime and these systems are not on high alert.

Who wouldn't be ?

Why this system was humiliated in both Syria and Lybia by Turkish drones then ? I do respect Russian weapons and Engineering a lot but i really can't find an explaintion why it failed badly in actual combat .

@@82boulou it's not human, it cannot be humiliated, it's so effective and capable that adversaries concentrate a lot of resources against this machine and make a big deal out of it.

@@82boulou If its such a bad system then explain why so many countries are buying it despite its "failures"? The intelligence community in different countries have a different view on this system compared to all these keyboardwarriors and hobbygenerals on youtube. I can promise you that the reality is quit different from that Turkish propaganda that is showed in KZfaq.

@@Daniel-jg8ff I have nothing against the system or Russian weapons and I'm not an expert on weapons but this system was reportedly eliminated twice by the air force of two different countries Turkey and Israel in that matter . maybe it was lack of training by the operators or the fact that this system cannot operate on it's own and must be integrated in multi layer air defence umbrella .

@@82boulou who told you that i wonder? )) 2 of these were damaged in Syria cause Syrian army used mobile phones to give orders so turkey used other drones (ankas) to target them for tb2 and despite that 20 tb2 were destroyed, but Turkey anyway did everything to show it as a kind of success, despite Turkey is our ally in Syria and we shouldnt be expecting those act from them! Actual combat was when drones attacked russian base!

well im not hopeing to be on the receving end of this i whould shit myself (sorry for my bad english)

hahaha, they are born with a big mouth...

And it’s biggest disadvantage is it’s inability to distinguish a drone from a large bird? Not very useful in Syria where Israel and Turkey uses drones to destroy them!??

Yeah Patsirs can run a way but can't hide from TB2 drones. We can seek and destroy everywhere them :D

@@JimCOsd55 well thas when they are sleepin but in russia thye make turns meeans they know when you get closer and they ahve atia erial canons,, i dount a drone could destroy one more easi it destroy the drone

No, the russian lies align not well with the imperial truth. Just sayin ...

Plus that those S1:s are also downgraded exportversions with less capable radar and firecontrollsystems

@@Daniel-jg8ff I don't know if they were intentionally downgraded but they were definitely not the newest versions.

@@EcchiRevenge Neither the newest and the exportversions are downgraded

They stopped in Syria. Of the 103, 72 were destroyed.

The S1 was the first version then the S1E like the one in the beginning of the video it has a radar with two sides. Then the S2 and now the most modern is the SM and the export version S1M, they have new radars and missiles, anti-drone missiles and they will get hypersonic missiles later.

Thank you putin for this amazing equipment

Nope cuz it is... Pantsir is after panzer and mean the same. Pantzer.

Yeah, the word "pantsir" in russian language came from the german word "panzer" - in linguistics this is called borrowing. Pantsir translates from russian like "carapace".

Bro! they came here to shit and claim that its russian propaganda - nothing else!!! because there is no propaganda in any of their (our) countries (bahahaha) - only in Russia !!!But if any of them had brains to think they would for example take all reports of destroyed vehicles and personnel in Karabakh since the beginning of recent conflict from both sides and it will show that both sides destroyed more units than both countries ever had!!!! Also this video is 4-5 years old actually and there were 3 modernisations of Pantsir and the only one who has the new one is Russia, probably deployed in Syria as well because none of the drones or missiles managed to reach their base there so far (and they tried a lot) New version has 8 or 12 smaller missiles against drones and amount of various combat experience this system got is priceless, so let them keep thinking that this Baklavaraktar 2 is better, that they can destroy any russian pantsir or other systems - let them think that thats how it all is - Hitler also thought......

dude, we've seen pantsirs being hit while their radars are active but not firing at all.. we ve heard and seen s-300, s-200 radars being hit by drones while they were active in Karabakh.. so then.. in that case export versions are useless against light armed drones. i donno if that is because of tactical utilization of the drones overwhelming them batteries.. or they are simply incapable of picking up drones that size? then just don't buy export versions of russian equipment, it will be a waste of your money? buy something else? we've withnessed this over and over again in history.. russian equipment utilized by 3rd world countries, sent back to junkyard being unable to shoot back against western equipment utilized by better trained armies. they are only good if the opposition's mostly guerillas or irregulars.. or if they have similar russian equipment.

@@tristansarmatov6435 Thanks you. Finaly a reasonable person with some Common sense and knowledge

@@bezgin7577 A SAM-system may be Operational but its totalt ineffective IF it has launched its weapons. Secondly: Third world countries has never used any weaponsystems used by Sovietunion or any other warsawpactcountry. All of these old weaponsystems has been old downgraded exportsystems plus they have Always encountered western systems that are 10-30 years more modern

@@Daniel-jg8ffthen you did not understand what i said.. whether they were inactive-active, they were ineffective, were worth as tumbling junk. pantsirs, tor systems were released in 2010s fairly modern, not 30 yaers old. they were developed in the same era with UCAVs and their extensive usage. They were advertised as an answer to UCAVs and they failed. From now on people won't buying those "export versions" as much.

are you from mars

@@freewriter5223 are you?

They are affraid to use PantSir in UKraine.

The target was softer and the bolts just got true without breaking in pieces, if it was hard metal or resisting material it will be destroyed in a pieces.

@KHAN SPENCER send me link to alternatives, which system could compare to this "crap" ? does it exist?

KHAN SPENCER Facepalm. Looks like you playing too much computer games, they kill brains. Pantsir is not some ultimate weapon, it is defense system which work in cooperation with other and deal with own targets. Who filmed video from your link? Heavy drones from large altitude? How it possibly? It means that skies are opened and not defended. Is it fail of Pantsir, or it just mean that country have no radars which controls skies and another complexes which can deal with aircraft on such altitudes? It is targets outside of Pansir range. Look how organized air defense in Russia: it is multilayered defense from bunch of misc radars and complexes, which work in united system. It is only way how it works. For each kind of target is own kind of radars and own weapons. What can attack S-400, can’t attack Pansir. What can attack Pantsir, can’t attack S-400. And so on, there are bunch of more weapons. It is like to say, that tanks are crap because with easy destroyed by bombers. You said exactly the same stupid thing. And about video: where you see S2? In video zero of S2 and even zero of S1. Syria have only S1E (E means ‘export’). Libya got bunch of Pantsir from UAE, it is also S1E (moreover, in Libya there are no at all people which can operate Pansir). Also on youre video is clear see how destroyed empty machines. Video is low quality, exist better, as example you can see at left side of video how crew is rest. On other videos you also can see empty opened car or crew around. Turkey show how it destroyed Pantsir in Libya, one was destroyed in hangar (turned off), other one when it was moved by truck (turned off), else one just abandoned during land battle with fire from bullets. Want to see how Pantsir works - look at Russian base in Syria, it was attacked by missiles, dozens times by drones and even several times by mortar fire. Pantsir and rest complexes perfectly protected base.

KHAN SPENCER Else again, Syria have nothing except S1E. Moreover, it even in theory can’t get S2, because Russia never sold own weapons, it is deny by Russian laws. In Russia possibly to buy only ‘export’ versions of weapons (sometimes that weapons even developed independently by different companies, one for Russian Army, another one for foreigners). As example everyone was sure that range of Kalibr missiles is only 300 km, because it is what could demonstrate countries which bought it. And then suddenly Russia used same Kalibr which flew over 1500 km and month ago 4500 km. It is perfect difference between limitations for export version and weapons which country produce for self. Modern Pantsir Russia installed on own base to protect self after it was attacked by american-backed drones. In result Pantsir protected base even from mortar, it is awesome. About S-400 - it is not rumors, but stupid propaganda. Before you buy such expensive and complicated complex as S-400, you firstly study people for years (and they know what it can and what not, they have practice) and of course get demonstration of possibilities before you paid. Nobody paid billions of dollars for unknown thing. First foreigner buyer of S-400 was China, before they bought it (and China bought a lot, they paid tens billions and still continue to buy), they organized (paid) incredible tests, when S-400 was attacked from all directions with massive attack of cruise missiles, S-400 eliminated everything. S-xx have a long good history, as example they perfectly eliminated American aviation during war in Vietnam, or how literally ancient S-125 (from 1961) shot down modern American so-called stealth F-117 in Serbia.

???

it just caught on fire by a small muntion on the battle field yesterday (12/24/22) Slava Ukraine ! Merry Christmas!!!

in that battle that you fought in a computer game? 😂

The Tunguska was actually the predecessor of the present Pantsir..

You can literally tell from the operators footage, that the operator is missing the drone on purpose the first time. Compared to the Second time, where he just let the radar track the drone and then shoots.

Hi im from the future where this is in warthunder what do u think

oh heeeaal noOoooOoOo

The Pansir isn't failing in Ukraine but the Buk is cool

How is the pantsir failing?

ок

Siiiiiiii estos documentales en español serían un Hit 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 así fueran subtitulos

lmaooo clown

Pantsir shot down 20 tb2 in Libya.

@@trololoev really? Can you please provide reference for the info? It'd be great if it's true

@@zidfih1176 there is a link in comment section below. If i give a link in the comments then my comment get deleted.

@@zidfih1176 defenceview.in/russian-pantsir-s-system-shot-down-47-turkish-bayraktar-tb2-drones-in-libya/

HAHAHAH!! The Himars doesn't take nearly as long! It is sooo "sophisticated" that the system is easy to use. Look how Ukraine is able to use it so fast!

All gone for production of Patriot missile system.

were your bayraktar?

Out of action after few months in war with the Mighty 🐻!!

@@deveshsharma2207 yeah mighty bear cant win with ukraine since 10 years lmaooooo

Without Pantsir Syria would be destroyed as consecuence of more than 400 cruise missile launched by Israel along these years and 166 by USA.

pantsir is hyped up. the concept is good but held back by the dire condition of russian electronics sector

it did well in defending khmeimim. Syrians are just badly trained

В Ливии находятся Панцири, которые были поставлены ОАЭ в 2011 году. С тех пор система прошла 2 серьезных обновления, получила новые радары, оптические системы и ракеты.

*This system was not intended to fight on the front line, its task is to cover the S-300 and S-400 complexes on the march, but since many countries build their air defense systems on the principle of the more expensive the better! For the purposes you are talking about, Tunguska serves in Russia, now it has a multi-channel optical sight installed, and it is easy to deal with drones, and now there is already a modification of the Pantsir to deal specifically with drones, it was shown last year at the Army 2019 forum , and it is fit for front line action, with a heavily armored cockpit!* kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p5ann5Vo1sild2g.html&ab_channel=%D0%A2%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%9C%D1%83%D1%85%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F

Russia like 90% of the countries in the world have defense forces this weapon is defensive, Russia is not an imperialist country the don't developed arms to project power that is why they only have just enough weapons to defend themselves, the US and NATO promised not to set bases or absorbed the mliliaries of neighboring states that they peacefully gave independence to, what does the US do surround Russia with military bases within miles of their brothers, just imagine if they did that. Putin has said that NATO and the US are the biggest militaries in the world and that he wishes he did not have to spend so much on defense he says that his people need hospitals, schools, housing but that the US won't stop knocking on their borthers. That is why weopens are different they have different missions that is why no aircraft carriers one they are to expensive and second they don't have a mission for them they are not defensive weopens.

@@gerardorodas1854 ahh i see. Bit i think you misunderstood what I’m saying I was talking about how they have helicopters fly so close to each other and they’re performing stunts like an 80s 90s actions movie. Not talking about any political matters. They do have an aircraft carrier though the Admiral Kuznetsov. However it colided with a dry dock and is out of service for a refitas of nov 2020.

Sorry Senor good observations.

@@gerardorodas1854 no worries And it’s always good getting more information

@@gerardorodas1854 Tell that to those Ukrainians now living in the US and other western European countries.

Export version

anti radiation missiles would hit that easily - ohh yes a missle trying to attack it,, ahhaah it has anti aerial cannon ok?

Whatever drops that jdam will be dead after though 😂

They didn't say it was carbon fiber, and it doesn't look like it,

@@definitelyfrank9341 what did it says? I don't want to watch it again. I'm at work. Although I will say threaded/weaving carbon fiber is one of the most expensive process out there. It takes longer to produce and it's a lot stronger than other carbon fiber processed

@@BlueRice "It is an organic thread that passes all tests. It is as strong as the metal structure" It looks like it's made of copper due to it's shininess and color.

@@definitelyfrank9341 thanks. It makes sense now

haha damn you cold as ice

nothing can see anything while it's not operated, you know?)

thas is not what nato said they lsot 43 drones ina smalla rea afater na inspectiong they found a pantsir in the middle of some trees. ,, that dronbe also was shot but they go images of it..

🤡

not near pantsir they down a lot of them

The Czech RM-70 was demolished in Kharkov last night. This artillery system will no longer disturb Belgorod

Your wishes have come true 😂😂

@@marshalljulie3676 you are absolutely hilarious LOL! Forgot about this comment lol

Russia got it back again. Don't worry with the tires. Russia can afford. Good luck in donbass

Ask for your money back 😐

ehehe... you funny guy.... this piece of shit is one of the worse SAM systems in Ukraine... more than 30 misseles needed to shot down one single HIMARS rocket.

@@imepriimek398 not true!!..The yanks even admit that the Russian systems are better that theirs.And the s400 and later versions are far better than any American system as they know because they don't like their enemies having them

@@Markdmarque Just bubbling nonsense. UAF captured 2 Pantsirs and they said that they are really bad (but we already know that). And the yanks didnt admit anything. Why should they?

@@imepriimek398 apparently Ukie forces also admitted US weapons as crap. yet still begging more and more. plus more money. if HIMARS so effective, why needs more of them? hint - they got destroyed 🤡

@@BRMCX69 "apparently Ukie forces also admitted US weapons as crap" - WHY DO YOU LIE? You stupid or only dumb?

How so?

FAILED? Its not even used in the war by either side

@@Daniel-jg8ff just watch video from azer military page dude...those in operational pantsir just getting bombed by "undetected" drone supplied from turkey...of course those pantsir gun and missile looks deadly but what is the use when u can't even detect your target...right?

@@fahmimike4999 noop they doesnt use the Pantsir. Secondly since they are using missiles to target at Long range they cant shoot if they have fired all its missiles

@@Daniel-jg8ff hey dude...pantsir is among the most recognize AA vehicle out there so yes...u clearly can see a pantsir there and second we talk about pantsir here dude...an excellent close and mid range AA..u got no missile?u have gun?u got no gun or missile?u should have a radar to detect the drone but!?pantsir is a multi link AA system which is one pantsir detect 1 drone another same link system will also receive the data

@@fahmimike4999 look it up. Armenia doesnt use the Pantsir