Except he chooses the top two cameras who has awful video.

@@Jessehermansonphotography not only in video lol

@@harrison00xXx nah both goated for photo

@@Bocsaphoto goated means bad? true And i can say that as a damn 900$ full frame DSLM owner :D

@@harrison00xXx I said nah meaning it's an opposition to what u said lol

Hahaha

Exactly. Imagine someone with a straight face ranking the Nikon D810, one of the best FF DSLRs in history near dead last right next to a crappy Instax camera. 🤣💀 Just when you thought YT gear channels couldn’t get any sillier.

@@marike1100 as people say this fugger is flexing

He’s probably using a digital camera to record, as all of his gear is on the table and he’s only using one hand so it’s probably his phone

You don’t know much about Leica or fuji x pros if you think he’s a videographer first

I see no cinema cameras though

You don’t know much about Leica or fuji x pros if you think he’s a cinematographer

Kiddeeographer

3 mounts are not that bad. The x-pro only needs one lens :)

@@perfectly_boring which lens ?

@@definingslawek4731 XPro-3 with the weather sealed 27mm is a fantastic one-lens solution for street photography imo. Small enough to be discreet, ludicrously sharp, and fits into a pocket

7 different cameras, 1 lens each :-)

Having too many lens mounts is some kind of inate fear I have. I inherited a lot of Nikon stuff but I'm not the biggest fan of their DSLRs so I've been getting into MFT and even just having 2 lens mounts kinda urks me. Weird, I know.

Sony E and Canon R are the meta

Now that, is a real cringe take. Your gear does not decide if you‘re a good photographer or not, many photographers choose leica, more choose canon or sony. It doesnt matter. You‘re cringe.

@@Ben-ig3bfI know a person who is seriously rich and when he goes to a posh restaurant he doesn't want to be treated like some paparazzi but like a client with money to spend, hence the Leica. Leicas can take pictures, no doubt about that, but It's no Hasselblad, if you know what I mean. Leicas are not about serious photography, modern day Leicas are not what they used to be decades ago

@@SuperDamny and still Hasselblad cameras are better and cost the same. Anyway, I think that Sony has the best all rounder cameras with a very high quality stopgap. I don't know how good Leica or Hasselblad image quality is, but the cameras are very limited.

@@kingghidorah8106 I'd take Sony any time 😁

Its he’s own list not necessarily the list for professionals .. if we talk photography purely d810 is still a beast video is another segment i would choose the samsung GH5, or sony a7r

your hair is very fluffy

Polaroids has become synonymous with instant photos. It's like saying Kleenex instead of tissues. Your analogy is flawed.

@@tykeboy16 it’s like calling all smartphones “iPhones”. The correct term would be instant photos

@@edoardodario that analogy is much closer to reality than your original one.

​@@edoardodarioso we should call all bandaids "adhesive bandages" and all Kleenexs "facial tissues", all chap sticks lip balms and all Velcro hook and loop fasteners

big true

Still trash though. Why can’t a camera manufacturer make an actually good instant camera? One that doesn’t have consistent issues, break in 6 months and actually has good build quality and a good lens on it. People would lap that shit up

I feel the D780 is your most capable camera there. Does video and no weird quirks like fixed lens, no back screen, etc… or maybe the S5. But understand why the QP and Xpro are favorites. They’re passion cameras.

Clout

Ppl need to see he owns it duh

The RP is fantastic isn’t it? I love mine!

@@RoastBeefSandwich its „ok“ish I really enjoyed it for over a year Then i began to be interested in wildlife and video In combination with the RP i thought i can get away with the RF800 F11 (amazing on full frame!) Since i was not that happy with the RP (wildlife and video) i replaced it with the R7 No full frame glory anymore but in anything else better

Facts way more lenses available for Sony will be cheaper and get more out of the gear fasho

Because he likes trying different things. To me it looks like he mostly covers small to medium events based on his choices. Playing with different stuff then is fine, because any camera can get that job done well. I'm a bit surprised he didn't have at least one of the smaller m43 bodies as a lightweight event camera. He could get a nice capable one with great manual controllers that would be smaller than most of these even with a fast prime on it. Great companion cameras to a full frame system for when you want something truly small.

Send them my way lol

Cost & intended use apparently not factors.

Also 7 camera's from 7 different brands isn't what I would expect a real professional to have. Professionals invest in lenses. You only need one high end camera with a nice collection of lenses. Those cameras are usually good for photos and videos. Then if needing more that one camera because of team work, better to have them compatible from the same brand. Ofcourse specialty cameras can be added to the mix like a Polaroid, go pro or drone. But that guy seems to have a weird collection, that will produce different formats and will require different color correction strategies. Also if he hiers an assistant to use a second camera at an event, each set of pictures will have a different image rendering quality.

@@tonymouannes this dog just wanted to flex. I'm not a professional but I have more coverage than this snob _videographer_ because I use a single camera with a 18-35 f2.8, a 50mm f1.7, a 90mm 2.8 macro, a 80-200 f2.8 and a 150-600.

​@@tonymouannes guy is just flexing. Lenses, as you stated are what stays, bodies come and go.

I a professional photographer and I use a D750. Weak photographers think camera bodies are the only important aspect.

I a an idiot

It’s all about the lens

@ZEFIR001 there are no-name cameras tho. And each brand sells at every price point. Also tape over just the logo won’t protect from scratches. I suppose it just catches a bit less attention and more so it looks cool to him

A year ago I literally searched through every option on the market on the budget of 1000-1500$ of camera + lens. The best bang for the buck I could find is Fujifilm XS-10 + Fujinon 18-55 2.8-4 lens kit. I am not a power user, but it was a great decision. One of the only kit lenses that is quite decent, 10x slowmotion, 4k and so on. Maybe for only landscape photography you could pick a bit cheaper camera + better lens, idk. But as a package this option was great.