Every Movie Released in IMAX 1.43:1

Every Movie Released in IMAX 1.43:1 - True IMAX

Рет қаралды 102,862

Күн бұрын

We asked the question after watching Dune Part 2 "What movies were actually released in 1.43:1 IMAX?" So join us as we take a look at what movies actually were released in the fabled largest IMAX format available.
🔥🔥THE PRODUCTION SERIES - • The Production of Film... 🔥🔥
⭐️⭐️⭐️
🖥️Editor: John Owens
✏️Writer: John Owens
📚Researcher: John Owens,
🖼️Thumbnail Squad: newsx3900
🤖A.I. Programs Used: Midjourney
⭐️⭐️⭐️
💬FRAME VOYAGER COMMUNITY💬
=============================
💭Join our Discord Channel💬 ► / discord
🐦Twitter ► / frame_voyager
📷Instagram ► / framevoyager
🎵TikTok ► / framevoyager
Join our KZfaq channel 📺 ► / @framevoyager
=============================
0:00 Every Movie Released in IMAX 1.43:1 - True IMAX
0:35 IMAX DMR Blowup 1.66:1 - Honorable Mentions
1:53 Films that shot in 1.43:1 but never released in that format
3:16 The 1.43:1 cropped releases
3:35 1.43:1 Releases
4:15 Future 1.43:1 Releases
4:31 EVERY FILM that used an IMAX Camera
Disclosure - Some of the links in the description box are affiliate links. At no extra cost to you, if you use those links to purchase an item, I will receive a small commission. I appreciate your support :)
-----
#dunepart2 #IMAX #FrameVoyager

Пікірлер: 246

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

VIDEO NOTE: Like an idiot I cut out the "Nope" in the edit for some reason. That was also released in 1.43:1

@Bucking_Fastard 2 ай бұрын

You've noped out of Nope

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

@@Bucking_Fastard 😅😅😅

@quantran13 2 ай бұрын

What about the Justice League Snyder Cut? I think it may have just been played in small screenings but man, what a great home theater experience for the format.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

@@quantran13 it technically was released at 1.33:1 ratio. So actually even more square than IMAX 😅

@quantran13 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager 😮‍💨

@Nick_Lavigne 2 ай бұрын

It's very annoying that they almost never release the larger versions on 4K Blu-ray.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

It really is. Though at least for some of them you get the larger picture like with Oppenheimer. But it's nothing compared to the real thing

@homeofcinema 2 ай бұрын

Because they look terrible on a tiny TV, they are made for huge IMAX Screens

@olek-piechaczek 2 ай бұрын

Yeah and you’ll never see a 1.43:1 released on blu-Ray. Maybe Snydercut because the entire thing was shot like that but otherwise not.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

And snyder cut was even more square than IMAX at 1.33:1

@nav27v 2 ай бұрын

I'd be ecstatic just to get Dune 1.90:1 home release. They know everyone's TV is basically perfectly sized for it. It's good enough for Nolan. Denis please get your head out of your ass!

@Mike_v_E 2 ай бұрын

We need more 4k blurays with the expanded ratio. Not 1.43:1 but 1.78:1 like Nolan does

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Totally agree!

@AgentJohn5646 Ай бұрын

True 1.43:1 IMAX film are 16k resolution. That would be a few Terabytes. You would have to put the film on like 10 triple layer Blu-ray disks!

@FinnishArmy Ай бұрын

Watching Dune Part 2, never seeing a SINGLE black bar scene, and it was all 1.43:1, it was insane.

@aleksijussilainen2638 Ай бұрын

I mean i didnt see it in imax and it didnt have black bars. I really confused really how you see "more" in imax when everybody says that.

@FinnishArmy Ай бұрын

@@aleksijussilainen2638 if it’s on an imax screen you get more height in the shot

@TheRealJohnHooper Ай бұрын

You saw half of the movie cropped away.. It was shot on ALEXA 65, which has a widescreen sensor. The real deal for this movie is 16:9.. For Imax they simply cut out parts left and right..

@adyan4010 Ай бұрын

@@aleksijussilainen2638that's because when movies are played in standard screen they cover the full picture whether they are filmed with imax cameras or not but you still won't get the full picture because the screen size are smaller compared to imax screen. Also, movies filmed with non imax cameras when they are played in imax theaters they don't cover the full screen

@ollietaro 16 күн бұрын

Dune Part Two has black bar scenes. Roughly 40 mins is in 1.43:1

@Blahblahblah42069 2 ай бұрын

I’ve only seen 4 imax 70mm films oppenhiemer, interstellar, tenet, and dune 2. They were all some of the best movie experiences I’ve ever had. I couldn’t recommend 1.43 imax enough

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

I almost got to see Interstellar in IMAX 70mm in NYC late last year, the showing got cancelled unfortunately.

@gurratell7326 2 ай бұрын

You really think it's the aspect ratio that did it, and not that the size of the screen is bigger, that the sound is cranked up slightly higher than a normal theatre and you really liked the imagery and story of the movies?

@Blahblahblah42069 2 ай бұрын

@@gurratell7326 yes

@Blahblahblah42069 2 ай бұрын

@@gurratell7326when I’m talking about 1.43 Its not just about aspect ratio its when that ratio takes up the whole screen because when you see one of those movies taking up the whole screen you just become completely immersed in the movie especially if you sit closer to the screen and not in the back of the theater.

@gurratell7326 2 ай бұрын

@@Blahblahblah42069 Out vision is closer to 1.77, so a screen at that ratio that would be even more immersive. So no that 1.43 craving that everyone has has more to do with marketing than anything else.

@themoley91 2 ай бұрын

I used to work in the DMR department at IMAX! Nice to hear someone actually talk about it.

@Xplozhun85 Ай бұрын

Hey that's really cool! If you don't mind me asking, what mastering software did you guys use? Was it commercial/enterprise like Davinci Resolve or Baselight or was it something in-house/proprietary? Were you an engineer or color scientist? Sorry lol just have so many questions!

@themoley91 Ай бұрын

@@Xplozhun85 the actual remastering software that upscales the images is proprietary but we used both Resolve and Baselight in the process actually. I was a production coordinator.

@Cavers 2 ай бұрын

You're missing a huge thing for this video. Films like Force Awakens only employed 1:43 for one scene around ish 1 minute seemingly for marketing purposes. The rest of the film was shown in a normal aspect ratio. It's rare for a film to actually be shown in 1:43 all the way through

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Well of course, there really hasn't been a film that has been 1.43:1 all the way through. But it still counts if it got a release even if that part was shorter. In our other video we mention at the end, we actually show how long each was shown.in 1.43:1

@raphi7279 2 ай бұрын

Watching First Man in IMAX 1.43:1, was amazing. The transition to the big screen, perfectly timed wenn the door opens and the you where able to see the Moon. The whole cinema was quiet, except for my little Wow. Also seeing Nope, with its transition through the window. Those where two awesome Cinema Moments.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

First Man's use case was so good for that aspect ratio too. Really hold it off until the climax of the film

@rohailshaikh7796 2 ай бұрын

Truly an incredible sequence in a remarkable movie💯

@rafaelc.c. 2 ай бұрын

Fantastic movie. So well made, with so much beauty and sensibility.

@jmalmsten 2 ай бұрын

One niggle I have is that aspect ratio isn't always inherently related to size. Scope is wider than 1.43:1 and therefore can be projected bigger, same thing with 4:3 or 1.33:1. It's taller but not necessarily bigger. I love movies shot for 1.43:1. But I also love movies shown in the intended ratio. The ratio the image was composed for. And I therefore love movies in 2.40:1, 2.76:1, 1.90:1, 1.67:1, 1.50:1... Etc etc So... I just love movies, I guess.. and I spend an unhealthy amount of time thinking about their shapes.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Oh, I love movies too in any ratio. IMAX is just a fun one to cover because it seems to get people so riled up haha. I've actually considered maybe doing some aspect ratio series and making lists of films in weird formats.

@jxod4296 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyagerPlease do. My favourite is 1.50:1 but I bet there is only a handful of movies with that aspect ratio.

@gurratell7326 2 ай бұрын

Yeah this hype for IMAX is just weird, 1.43:1 might look better for some movies but definitely not all. But people often fall for he hype that IMAX is supposed to be better because the marketing says so, so therefor 1.43:1 is the only way to go apparently..

@alifpr Ай бұрын

This is such a niche but well done video, with great detail and concise information. Subbed! ❤

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

THE FULL LIST: NOPE The Dark Knight (2008) Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (2009) Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol (2011) The Dark Knight Rises (2012) The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013) Interstellar (2014) Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015) Appears to have been released in some sense in 1.43:1 Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) Dunkirk (2017) First Man (2018) The Lion King (2019) Tenet (2020) Dune (2021) No Time to Die (2021) Eternals (2021) 1.43:1 aspect ratio (IMAX GT Laser venues only) Lightyear (2022) Oppenheimer (2023) Dune: Part Two (2024) The ant bully Happy Feet Kung Fu Panda (2008) Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa

@DurgaPrasad-ks9em 2 ай бұрын

Damn, never realized it’s iPad screen ratio too. I’m happy now.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

😅😅😅 Exactly how our lord and savior Christopher Nolan intended you to see it. On the iPad!

@DurgaPrasad-ks9em 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyagerThanks for letting us know.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

@@DurgaPrasad-ks9em Just spreading the word!

@KDCloudy 2 ай бұрын

Cool list! Love that you guys are making more IMAX content lately. One more film (and interesting trivia) to note in the “shot on 1.43 but never released list” is The Prestige Nolan liked working with IMAX for Batman Begins’ DMR process (whose few minutes were upscaled to 6K and then printed onto 70mm film, rest in 4K) and wanted to try out working with an IMAX camera for TDK The Prestige turned out to be the testing grounds for it, and they shot the finger cutting scene on IMAX 65mm film, but downscaled it to 35mm just to see how it would intercut with the other filmstock. This was also the first time IMAX film was downscaled to 35mm This was said by IMAX CQO David Keighley on few interviews.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Nice! I'll have to check that out. IMAX stuff sometimes is hard to parse through 😅

@KDCloudy 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager Yup. I usually resort to Wayback Machine and Twitter search for researching for my own videos. You did an excellent job on this though!

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Yeah I find around early 2000's era stuff is all over the place. So much of this was all new and that in turn made some information slightly suspect.

@chrisfratz 2 ай бұрын

I am saving this video to watch later in a VR chat world that has a giant 1.43:1 aspect ratio screen.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

hahahaha send me a photo of it on twitter on Instagram 😅

@chrisfratz 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager I will absolutely be @ing you on Twitter with a few pictures.

@fizzipop 2 ай бұрын

which vrchat world?

@chrisfratz 2 ай бұрын

@@fizzipop It is a world called a VFI Cinema

@HeroesReforged 2 ай бұрын

IMAX is also releasing a ton of their documentaries on the Apple Vision Pro in 1.43:1. I wonder if some of these narrative films will be remastered with the 1.43:1 sequences restored to their full AR. At the very least, these should be included as special features on the Blu-ray.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Oh that's cool! Waiting for my android version of Apple Vision Pro to come out haha

@edvinjohn1316 2 ай бұрын

The ONLY film actually released in 1.43:1 is Zack Snyder's Justice League (2021).

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Zack Snyder's film was released in 1.33:1

@difaalfaris7522 Ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyagerwas there any technical issue that prevent filmmaker to shot a film full in a boxy sequence for imax release-like apart from scenes shot with imax camera, could they use digital to shot in a same aspect ratio? Or does the resolution gap is too big for imax screen? I thought you can screen a boxy film like zsjl on imax theatre and get a full imax experience lol

@hothemeep1219 Ай бұрын

Lmao you were so sure of yourself

@TheLingo56 2 ай бұрын

Respect for opening this video and immediately seeing the video player was 1.43:1 lmao

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

🫡🫡🫡 it's the HOLY FORMAT

@kinnexion 28 күн бұрын

I went to see Dune Part 1, Part 2 and Oppenheimer in 1:43.1 70MM IMAX. What an experience. Watching films in any other way basically pales in comparison. It’s one of those “You have to see it to understand it” kind of experiences

@MrTizzay 2 ай бұрын

This vid could not be more my jam, I love us aspect ratio nerds

@MikeTaffet 2 ай бұрын

Can confirm I saw The Force Awakens in 1.43 IMAX (Christmas 2015 in Toronto)

@IMAX1570mm 2 ай бұрын

I agree with the idea of including the IMAX version on Blu-ray, but I think it's even more important to screen the IMAX version on a regular basis.

@mtvisionary 2 ай бұрын

Lion king I believe was blown up to fit 1:43 1 because I saw it at the massive Lincoln center imax on release and it was pixelated as hell. It looked like one of those David attenbourogh docs where you could see where they where obviously cropping in lol

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

It was close! But everything I've found says it was 1.66:1 so really close but not all the way there

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Fun little video of a question we asked ourselves after watcing Dune Part 2 in IMAX. Just how many films have actually been released in FULL IMAX? Let us know if we missed any!

@jahmeelthwaites 2 ай бұрын

Love learning about things like this. I’ve never had the chance to see TRUE imax but sure hope to some day. I was about to ask if Zack Snyder’s justice league was shot in that aspect ratio but then learned it was actually 1.33:1 😅

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Yep! Zach Snyder went farther than IMAX for that one lol. It's truly a crazy experience when you see a film that was designed for it like Dune Part 2 or Oppenheimer

@maxmeijer1567 2 ай бұрын

Where did you get the information about Joker 2 and Mufasa in 1.43?

@3k3k3 2 ай бұрын

They could shoot it 1:1 if they wanted, if the director wants it framed in 2.20:1 then that is how it should be projected and showed. Bladerunner is an example of this, they opened the matte for iMax but it was framed for 16:9

@miloa.2684 2 ай бұрын

I’ll never forget seeing Star Trek: Into Darkness on IMAX 70mm film in 3D

@MikeTaffet 2 ай бұрын

I’m pretty sure 3D and 70mm film are mutually exclusive for IMAX

@icydec3346 2 ай бұрын

@@MikeTaffet ?? I have two 3D 15/70 theatres in my area, they have two IMAX 70mm projectors next to each other in the booth. In fact one of those theatres is where I saw Oppenheimer, and most recently Tenet/Dune2

@adog1138 2 ай бұрын

You missed Nope for films in 1.43:1 and Attack of the Clones was one of the early IMAX DMR releases but otherwise great video!

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Yeah, nope was a casualty of an edit mishap 🥲 it was on my list but got cut out by accident. Attack of the clones did have that dmr release. I just can't remember if I didn't put it on that list because it wasn't 1.66:1. I could be mistaken tho

@checcmac8693 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyagerI think you also missed The Hateful Eight

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

@@checcmac8693 the hateful right is in panavision 70mm, which is a widescreen format.

@berhunt Ай бұрын

Blade Runner 2049 was amazing in full iMax and missing this list

@AwesomeEvan10 2 ай бұрын

Hoping to make it in Hollywood as Cinema Director. Love to make something with IMAX 70MM film

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

I can't even imagine trying to use that behemoth of a camera

@ps2progamer814 2 ай бұрын

Thats why Hoytema is there to help you@@FrameVoyager

@TehObLiVioUs 2 ай бұрын

i'm cryyyyyyying the same theater that played my oppenheimer 15/70mm 1.43:1 showing showed dune 2 on 1.90:1 oooooofs,

@itsatekiar9750 2 ай бұрын

The force awakens running towards the falcon til entering space over jakku was in 1.43 ratio

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Yep! It was mostly a marketing gimmick of we're being honest but we still include it 😅

@VariTimo Ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyagerWasn’t just a marketing gimmick. It was a neat full IMAX sequence.

@FrameVoyager Ай бұрын

@@VariTimo for sure, loved the sequence. But just listening to the talk about using IMAX for this film, it sounds like they were forced to use it haha. Which actually makes sense because of the deal Disney had with IMAX.

@itsatekiar9750 2 ай бұрын

I remember Star Trek into darkness filled up the entire 1.43 aspect ratio when it was at the universal city walk imax during the khan fight scene when uhura is speaking to the Klingons

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

I've heard that but I just couldn't find any materials to show that it was actually 1.43.

@itsatekiar9750 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager watching that scene fill up the whole screen like imax shot Nolan films was glorious.

@andersenpeters 2 ай бұрын

I know saw The Lion King and Treasure Planet in IMAX as a teenager but I couldn't recall anything particular about either experience for the life of me.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

😅😅😅 sounds similar to my experience with it.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

@@andersenpeters 🥲

@benself 2 ай бұрын

I watched this video in an IMAX Dual Laser theater

@fakhridito5532 24 күн бұрын

The fact that i experience fast five in imax dmr blow up is insane and i will never fotget it

@numberjuan469 24 күн бұрын

what would you consider zsjl?

@seangentry2943 Ай бұрын

Some notes: Prometheus apparently got a cropped 1.66:1 version made for IMAX 70mm prints, so that could be another entry in the "almost" category. Wonder Woman 1984's IMAX scenes were 1.90:1, not 1.78:1. Godzilla x Kong is going to be 1.90:1, and not 1.43:1, based on information from IMAX themselves. We also don't really know for sure yet whether Joker 2 is getting a 1.43:1 IMAX release. It's possible it might just get regular 70mm prints (2.20:1 ratio).

@brettcameratraveler 2 ай бұрын

Thinking about the human eye FOV so I did some quick calculations and it's about 200 horizontal and 120 vertical. This works out to exactly 1:1.66 aspect ratio. That's a common European theatrical aspect ratio.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Interesting!

@VariTimo Ай бұрын

Yes but there is something weird about perfectly even ratios like 1.66:1, 2.00:1 and square. Also IMAX isn’t about just having the human field of view, the point is to have extra stuff for the periphery.

@tamilanimatedstories5610 2 ай бұрын

Here before everyone else

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Yeah... you really gotta get here before all the bandwagon viewers do 👀

@mrbrew1969 Ай бұрын

GxK is runtime 1hr 55mins and Gojira minus one was runtime 2hrs 5mins in IMAX AMC

@cjspyker 2 ай бұрын

wasnt Beau is afraid shot for IMAX release?, a24 IMAX movie

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Sony Rialto but was distributed at 1.85:1 which probably fit within the other IMAX standard of 1.90:1.

@alejandro_allo 2 ай бұрын

Hey! I don't mean this as a mean comment or anything, but there's some weird digital noise in this video, around 15.9kHz. Sounds like it might be in the voice-over audio. Just wanted to let you know!

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Hmmm... That's odd. Are you listening with headphones? Might be the TV's in the background. I usually have a filter that I use that kills that but might have missed it on this one. Thanks for the heads up!

@jerichojeriel4983 2 ай бұрын

I think Zack Snyder’s Justice League had a limited release in Imax Theaters with it’s 1.43:1 ratio.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

I've looked into it, Zack Snyder even has an interview saying he shot 1.43:1 scenes but the process to get there sounds more like it ended up at 1.33:1 and they cropped the edges in. And while I've seen photos of this being shown in IMAX theaters, it's unclear if it's 1.43:1 or just 1.33:1 or maybe a slight zoom in. If someone can find me any technical specs that show that it was I'll be sure to add it to the pinned comments! I've just never seen anything definitive about it and most technical details or articles about the IMAX release don't say. 😅

@jerichojeriel4983 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager ohhh, maybe because they shoot it in open matte Super 35mm not in IMAX camera that's why it's 1.33:1.

@FrameVoyager Ай бұрын

@@jerichojeriel4983 haha probably! The Justice League one has always been so confusing 😅

@jonasfilmltd 2 ай бұрын

It’s kind of funny how we’re going back to almost Citizen Kane aspect ratio (1.37:1)

@rafaelc.c. 2 ай бұрын

Yeah. No aspect ratio is better and we should use the one that fits the best for each film. Square is not old but square is not better as IMAX riders say now. You don't see more with more squared ratios. Of course, if you shoot it square and then you crop it to wide you are losing image, but if you shoot it wide and then crop it to square you are losing too. People don't usually get that.

@mashthereal Ай бұрын

Imax seems like a stupid way to add more cost to the movie going experience just for a few minutes in a particular ratio

@FrameVoyager Ай бұрын

It's a little bit more than just the ratio. Larger screen and a 12 channel audio system. Only Dolby has better audio imo.

@Saturntime33 2 ай бұрын

Wait but if it wasn’t shot in that format, the gate wouldn’t be that open to that aspect ratio. There still might be some top and bottom info there but it would be cropped in because of digital sensor being wide? If that being said they might be losing info on the sides in that tall aspect ratio.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

They generally aren't. The ALEXA LF, which was used for Dune part 2, filmed at open gate (basically using the whole sensor) which is already at 3:2 at 4448 x 3096 resolution. Generally most productions actually crop in the top and bottom of the image.

@blueherostudios8591 24 күн бұрын

I saw Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire in BFI IMAX 3D, but the movie is at 2.35:1 and 1.90:1. Instead of 2.35:1 and 1.43:1. Which is very weird. I thought they’re going to present some scenes in 1.43:1.

@FrameVoyager 24 күн бұрын

Either just a rumor that was wrong or they just cut it. The format has a weird history of people saying it "would be" and then never materializing. Joker 2 though has already announced 70mm showings

@SFtheGreat Ай бұрын

The question remains, why is it so hard to include one more BD, or use BD100, to include the film in IMAX aspect ratio as a bonus.

@thijmendevalk 2 ай бұрын

You did skip the most obscure 1.43 release: Ghostbusters (2016). It had, I believe, 1 scene near the end that expanded all the way to 1.43 and 3D frame breaks throughout the rest of the movie.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Huh, in all my research into that, this movie never came up. Could be because it's only listed as having the 3d effect fille the 1.43:1 area. Do you know what scene at the end had that 1.43:1 expansion?

@thijmendevalk 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager It was the sequence inside the portal, where Erin jumps in to grab Abby. However, while I know for sure that sequence expanded to 1.85:1 in a regular 3D showing, I only vaguely recall the 1.43:1 thing from an interview the director gave, and only ‘cuz he was so giddy about it. But I can’t find that interview anymore for the life of me. And a random Reddit post now says that sequence only went to 1.78:1 and Wikipedia says 1.90:1… so… I guess I partially stand corrected and only the 3D effects went full size? 😅

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

@@thijmendevalk I think that's what happened 😅 honestly, there are so many productions that like get excited about using IMAX cameras or ratios and then you never hear about it when they release the film.

@nemesiscv 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager I saw it in IMAX 1:43 showing of the movie in France. There was actually 1 sequence with the format, but it was not shot that way. There were just effects coming out of the frame, giving you a funny effect in 3D with lasers and ghosts. IMDB is pretty accurate when it comes to aspect ratio and it confirms it was in 1:43 for "frame break".

@TypicalBlox Ай бұрын

tornado alley movie: sad noises

@maxmeijer1567 2 ай бұрын

Godzilla x Kong will only be for 45 minutes in 1.90

@JahillMC 2 ай бұрын

Pretty sure Force Awakens was full IMAX from its release date

@HT_addict 2 ай бұрын

did you get confirmation on godzilla x kong the new empire for 1.43? Melbourne Australia claims 1.90

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Yeah, might need to revise that. They had some materials that said that, but it seems like they are cutting it down.

@phoenixfunny4517 2 ай бұрын

Did you miss NOPE?

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

You know what, I think I accidentally cut it out while editing. Whoops haha. Added a video note in the comments. Thanks for catching that!

@emmanuelnaicker2067 28 күн бұрын

The Snyder Cut should've gotten an honorable mention

@LamationsakaThatDude 2 ай бұрын

I now know too much of IMAX because of this channel.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

The ol' IMAX content well is a spring that just keeps on giving. 🙃

@tokelahti 2 ай бұрын

Why camera uses 65mm, but the print is 70mm without any soundtracks? Just because those film stocks were already available?

@VariTimo Ай бұрын

100%. They needed to use existing gauges so labs could process it. No reason to get Kodak to make a new format that would have been much harder to get processed and handled. This way they could use any lab that can do 65mm and 70mm and many of the same tools used to 70mm. No need for new platters, splicing stations and reels. Although in the end they did come up with their own splicing method to increase durability.

@tokelahti Ай бұрын

@@VariTimo, labs can easily develop both widths. So, I guess it was and is about cutting the camera negative. Recently one Nolan got Kodak to splice b&w to 65mm for just one film, so it’s not impossible…

@CBAS_918 2 ай бұрын

We in India don't really have the 1.43:1 IMAX screens. Hence, we have to settle for LieMAX.😢

@tanakax25 2 ай бұрын

I feel like I've heard about IMAX being talked about more than I've actually ever watched IMAX footage, even in 1.90 😂 Fuck the IMAX hype I'm fine with Dolby Cinema.

@AKA.JohnnyHai 2 ай бұрын

0:18what film?

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Narrative based not documentary based

@OtmanChh 14 күн бұрын

they need to start building these screens all over the world what's the point of a movie coming in that ratio if no one gets to even see it in said ratio

@rubendeschepper8514 2 ай бұрын

You forgot Nope also has an 1.43 release

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Got accidentally cut out during the edit. My bad!

@lukasaumuller9811 2 ай бұрын

What countries have a cinemas with 1.43:1 screen ? I know mine doesn’t

@freneticdemigod 2 ай бұрын

why theres so less number of films in actual imax ??🤔

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

It's not an easy format to commit to. But they have 2 formats and most people will go for the 1.90:1 ratio instead

@wolfelkan8183 Ай бұрын

Are there any movies that used 1.43:1 for the entire film? Most just use it for certain shots.

@Southized Ай бұрын

avengers endgame and infinity war although i have the open matte version of endgame

@zukacs 2 ай бұрын

Any chance someone shoots in 1:1 in future? :D

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Probably at this point haha. I know the lighthouse was really close at 1.19:1

@Sneedles 2 ай бұрын

Thumbnail is a bit misleading btw

@Tommi6810 2 ай бұрын

I watched Dune in Imax and iSense, in Imax it looks like another movie.

@rafaelc.c. 2 ай бұрын

I did watch it too and it was exactly the same movie.

@Tommi6810 2 ай бұрын

@@rafaelc.c. I also just wrote that it looks like a different film because the content of the picture is larger, of course it's the same film. Take a look at comparisons of Imax to normal screens on KZfaq and you'll understand what I mean.

@jackraider1039 2 ай бұрын

IMAx is cool and all but there's one problem, there's no reclining seats!!!

@kalyanvejalla 2 ай бұрын

You missed Nope! That was shot in IMAX film and released only digitally to IMAX in 1.43:1. I saw it in 1.43:1 in dual laser IMAX and it was fantastic! Also Godzilla v Kong is not going to be 1.43:1 in IMAX, only 1.90:! There has been no official confirmation (from studio or creative team or from IMAX) that it will be 1.43:1. Do not use IMDb as a source for aspect ratios, its a terrrible source for aspect ratio details especially when the movie hasnt even released yet.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Yep! We have that pinned on the comments above. Just an accidental cut while we were editing. We didn't use IMDb for Godzilla x Kong, had a different source. I don't generally trust IMDb haha but yeah looking like they either sidestepped doing that or it was just a rumor. We'll add a note

@kalyanvejalla 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager Oh I see. Great video nonetheless I loved it. Where did u hear Joker 2 will release in 1.43:1? This is news to me and I'd love to know where you heard this. If what you say is true, I am so damn excited!

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

@@kalyanvejalla I'll have dig up my source on that. Half the time they tease it but never release it 😅 but they're likely using the alexa65 which can do that format

@Tiago_SD 2 ай бұрын

If is shot by IMAX cameras what diference it makes the format really dont understand. This big formats are as powerful as every big one,

@keaton718 2 ай бұрын

Wonder if AI will one day let any movie be IMAX framed with generative fill. I guess not true max if each shot wasn't framed like that by a director, but still why's stop at IMAX, generative fill every shot in a movie to full 360 VR.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Honestly, probably a thing that will happen at some point. AI is going to change a lot of stuff good and bad

@VariTimo Ай бұрын

Pretty wack to crop regular footage to 1.43:1 to make an illustration. It really messes up the intention of the composition. Also IMDb tech specs are not a reliable source.

@FrameVoyager Ай бұрын

Yeah IMDb is not where I get my sources from. I'll look at it but I don't rely on it solely for information.

@Bluboy30 2 ай бұрын

I saw OBLIVION at a 70mm IMAX theater and the expanded footage was shown at 1.90:1, no 1.43:1.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

That's what I thought. I had someone in the comments say they saw the 1.43:1 showing but it's hard to tell if any of that is accurate.

@Bluboy30 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager Of course, I can't speak for that person's experience but the film was shown at our local true IMAX theater and there's only 1.90:1 aspect ratio for the "IMAX" sequences. It's been over 10 years since the film came out, maybe that person's memory is a bit mixed up? 😆

@avdcam 2 ай бұрын

I saw it too. But it’s hard to remember, it did look incredible though since it was capture at 4K with an 8K diagonal bayer sensor , yay Sony

@scott9235 2 ай бұрын

You forgot planet of the apes is also being shown in imax this year

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

But not in 1.43:1 ratio. It's only been reported at IMAX:s secondary 1.90:1 ratio

@scott9235 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager ohhhh ok that's funny how they advertise it is gonna be imax but not true imax 😂

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

@@scott9235 Well technically it is still "true" IMAX. It's an expanded ratio they say you can only see in IMAX theaters. So you still do get more out of it, it's just not their like premiere version. Which honestly, most films rarely even release in that format.

@scott9235 2 ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager oh wow ok thanks for the info that's good to know

@Deuterocomical 2 ай бұрын

I thought Fantasia was 1.43?

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Fantasia was 1.37:1 😅

@benbunch4159 28 күн бұрын

Aspect ratio shouldn’t have anything to do with the size of the screen. If they want the movie to be 1.43:1 then release it in that format on all screens.

@junaidfazlani04 2 ай бұрын

Think you forgot zack Snyder's justice league

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

1.33:1 release

@mtvisionary 2 ай бұрын

Nope was 1:43.1 and godzilla full ratio seemed to have been reduced after checking latest wiki update but then again it's wiki so I can't really trust that

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Yeah nopes exclusion was an editing hiccup. Was in there but accidentally cut it out lol But yeah, information on this is all pretty suspect anyways 😅

@ali_isaweeb5056 2 ай бұрын

You forgot nope (2022)

@mrshaheedmalik 2 ай бұрын

ABANDONED: Pixels

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

😅😅😅 For real sometimes though

@arindraputri9368 Ай бұрын

I thought justice league is one of em

@kalyanvejalla 2 ай бұрын

lol so unfair to call old IMAX DMR movies Liemaxes. They still got 15/70mm prints and played in GT venues. 99% of IMAX movies are DMR -- sure they aint as good as IMAX filmed movies but they are still phenomenal on that large GT screen! Also WW84 never got a 1.78:1 aspect ratio release, it was only 1.90:1 at home release and at all IMAX venues including GT dual laser. Also, Amazing Spiderman did not have any 1.43:1 scenes in IMAX. I saw in on IMAX film back in the day.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Oh I didn't call those liemaxes 😅 but they didn't go to full 1.43:1. Liemax is also super tongue in cheek and more of just being sarcastic haha. Also, we didn't say Amazing Spiderman did release any of them, only there had been reports that there were potential scenes they never released.

@Southized Ай бұрын

I dont think interstellar is full imax, it changes aspect during film and only some scenes are in imax ratio

@FrameVoyager Ай бұрын

No films have full IMAX aspect ratio. Except for maybe IMAX documentaries

@Southized Ай бұрын

@@FrameVoyager endgame and infinity war?? Blade runner2049?? They stay full screen the entire film

@FrameVoyager Ай бұрын

@@Southized none of those are 1.43:1 ratio films

@gossymer. 2 ай бұрын

I was obsessed with IMAX until I realized I never paid attention to the top and bottom of the screen? Ive been enjoying screenx more since it feels more immersive and watching Dune 2 was so awesome

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

I would say it's a different kind of immersion. ScreenX is pretty cool though, just not as prevalent

@chasx7062 2 ай бұрын

So basically its just TV 4:3 format on steroids overhype???

@VariTimo Ай бұрын

IMAX theaters have different geometry. The point of IMAX is extra footage for the peripheral vision. All the important part of the image is the center. The framing is very different. The only thing IMAX 1.43:1 and 4:3 have in common is the screen shape. That’s why Nolan’s films are 16:9 on the Blu ray.

@Stryker580 2 ай бұрын

This aspect ratio sucks😢 It just buggs me, because we are regressing

@TheRealJohnHooper Ай бұрын

Dune 2 was shot on ALEXA 65 which has a widescreen sensor.. Not in Imax format! Imax Format gets cropped on the sides for that movie. I saw the movie in an ONYX LED Wall theatre that shows the full 16:9 format it was intended!

@caracolrojo 2 ай бұрын

LIEMAX 😂

@kshmr_k9 2 ай бұрын

Please let go of the term liemax. Your precious 1:43.1 is only available like 40 places on this planet. Only 30 of them show commercial movies. "Liemax" (digital, xenon, 2k) is available in 1500+ location. You really think the 1:43.1 generate more revenue than xenon? Yes, IMAX is at fault for not marketing the term properly but with dual laser it's time to let "liemax" as a term go

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

It's literally just a joke 😅

@packdrawn 22 күн бұрын

Why would you put this like tube-cam effect over the footage from these films? This whole video is about displaying films 'how the filmmakers intended' - you think that's what Malick intended with The Tree of Life?🤣

@ytfeelslikenorthkorea Ай бұрын

what? Yet another Lion King? Yet another Godzilla? Yet another Joker? And Hollywood wonders why they stopped being relevant and no one cares!

@rubendeschepper8514 2 ай бұрын

Godzilla is not confirmed for 1.43. Probably 1.9. Joker is also not confirmed for 1.43

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Currently listed on IMDb as well as a few other places. m.imdb.com/title/tt14539740/technical/ IMDb is generally about 90% accurate. But both show it has at least the ability to show in that format.

@pwnwin 2 ай бұрын

Lmfao it doesnt matter. You're just stretching it up so it can be compressed with black bars on the side again. All that matters is the whole movie fit on your screen.

@danim8 Ай бұрын

I despise the term LieMAX. If you are going to roll with that then Oppenheimer, is LIEMAX. so is every other film shown as IMAX. Only the documentaries shot in 15/70 and Omnimax films are Real IMAX. Period. IMAX is a brand and comes in many flavors. Screen size relative to the size of teh auditorium is a factor, as is the type of projection. They are all IMAX and its just bad journalism to use a term that simple doesn't apply anymore. Hell by your own metric id a film like oppenheimer is being shown at a large 1:43 theater on 15/70 film but uses an IWERKS 15/70 projector is it IMAX? no it isn't IMAX any more. Its IWERKS? but does that matter? no it doesn't.

@FrameVoyager Ай бұрын

The Liemax line was a joke 😂

@user-qb5ci8fn5w 16 күн бұрын

Why do theaters rip people off, why csnt they just make the correct screen size. It's not even lazy to not do so lmao just a waste of not doing so. Makes no sense.

@united6329 2 ай бұрын

NOPE

@markgarcia8253 2 ай бұрын

1.43:1 is HIGHLY overrated. We as a society started in 4:3 bw film (nearly identical to 1.43:1), to 1.85:1 & then to cinescope 2.35:1 by 1953. The only benefit 1.43:1 IMAX film has is the image quality. Besides that, it’s just a glorified 1x1 aspect ratio.

@FrameVoyager 2 ай бұрын

Don't speak of the HOLY RATIO with such DISRESPECT 😤😤😤

@thorstenjaspert9394 2 ай бұрын

390/500 It's a shame to see how much of the image height is lost from the IMAX Digital to the Scope version. More and more of the original image is simply cut away. The close-ups are much too close in the scope version. That seems strange, I think. If the film had originally been shot in scope format, it would have composed the images differently and left more space there. It would be nice. It would be nice if there comes out a 16:9 UHD Version to save most of the height for TV presentation.

@dilbophagginz 2 ай бұрын

watched Dune in IMAX, looked good to me idk

@thorstenjaspert9394 2 ай бұрын

If you shoot in 1: 1.78 or 1:2.39 you photograph differently. On IMAX 1:1,43 looks great. All other formats are cropped, big parts if the picture goes lost. It's like pan scans of the windscreen for 4:3 TV transmission.