Every VAR Decision Qatar World Cup 2022 | Explained
Рет қаралды 100,408
Күн бұрынIn this video, we'll show you every VAR review from the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022, with explanations for every decision along with a determination of whether the correct decision was made. If you're looking for clear explanations with references to the Laws of the Game, we've got you covered.
Argentina vs France WC Final Ref & VAR review video here: • Argentina vs France Re...
Morocco vs France VAR review Video here: • Did VAR Cost Morocco A...
Argentina vs Netherlands VAR review video here: • Netherlands vs Argenti...
Video subtitles can be translated into any language using YT's automatic translation function.
We hope you enjoy the video and welcome your comments below. Don't forget to subscribe!
FREE eBook 'Effective Communication for Referees' - www.pauljspacey.com/ebooks
Online Programs For Coaches & Players - www.pauljspacey.com
#referee #worldcup2022 #var
----------
Chapters:
0:00 Intro
0:19 Ecuador vs Qatar
1:03 England vs Iran
1:20 Argentina vs Saud Arabia
2:25 Denmark vs Tunisia
2:46 Poland vs Mexico
3:13 Japan vs Germany
3:35 Canada vs Belgium
4:48 Portugal vs Ghana
5:15 Wales vs Iran
5:54 Senegal vs Qatar
6:20 Netherlands vs Ecuador
6:56 Poland vs Saudi Arabia
7:19 Morocco vs Belgium
7:45 Germany vs Spain
8:00 Cameroon vs Serbia
8:18 Ghana vs South Korea
8:46 Brazil vs Switzerland
9:04 Portugal vs Uruguay
9:44 Netherlands vs Qatar
10:00 France vs Tunisia
11:13 Poland vs Argentina
11:36 Belgium vs Croatia
12:37 Germany vs Costa Rica
13:00 Japan vs Spain
14:14 Uruguay vs Ghana
14:57 France vs Poland
15:16 Portugal vs Morocco
15:55 England vs France
17:07 Summary
----------
VAR (video assistant referee) can be used to review four types of decision: goals and the violations that precede them, red cards, penalties, and mistaken identity when awarding a card. In some cases, a decision made by the main referee can be overturned; however, it must be a "clear error" for this to happen.
referee
VAR
penalty
video assistant referee
qatar world cup 2022
Japan goal vs spain
argentina offside goal
wilton sampaio referee
Harry Kane penalty
Lewandowski foul Mexico
carrasco handball belgium
World Cup VAR decisions
Martinez offside argentina saudi arabia
england vs france
Japan vs spain
Poland vs mexico
ecuador vs netherlands
Wales Hennessey red card
belgium vs canada
germany vs spain
Brazil vs Switzerland
richarlison offside Brazil Switzerland
explanation
match officials
Fifa
laws of the game
Dans cette vidéo, nous vous montrerons chaque examen VAR de la Coupe du monde du Qatar, avec des explications pour chaque décision ainsi qu'une détermination pour savoir si la bonne décision a été prise. Si vous cherchez des explications claires avec des références aux Lois du Jeu, nous avons ce qu'il vous faut.
Pour les francophones, vous pouvez utiliser les sous-titres et la fonction de traduction automatique.
En este video, le mostraremos todas las revisiones de VAR en la Copa Mundial de Qatar, con explicaciones de cada decisión junto con una determinación de si se tomó la decisión correcta. Si está buscando explicaciones claras con referencias a las Leyes del juego, lo tenemos cubierto.
Para hispanohablantes, puede usar subtítulos y la función de traducción automática.
In diesem Video zeigen wir Ihnen jeden VAR-Rückblick bei der Katar-Weltmeisterschaft, mit Erklärungen für jede Entscheidung und einer Feststellung, ob die richtige Entscheidung getroffen wurde. Wenn Sie nach klaren Erklärungen mit Verweisen auf die Spielregeln suchen, sind Sie bei uns genau richtig.
Für Deutschsprachige stehen Untertitel und die automatische Übersetzungsfunktion zur Verfügung.
@ep2622 Жыл бұрын
😂😂 I love how detailed and complex he is and then randomly trash talks Lukaku at 12:27.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
😂 good spot
@johndixon7007 Жыл бұрын
Unbelievable ability to make a video with so much detail so quickly, and so clearly! 👏
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
wow thank you so much John! Hopefully people enjoy it :-)
@svokxz6435 Жыл бұрын
It is crazy of how VAR makes a huge impact on World Cup Games.Especially the World Cup Final with Varane's behind.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
It does have a substantial impact on games; thankfully most of the decisions are correct but some of the subjective decisions can still be debatable. You need some luck and decisions to go your way to win a major tournament.
@ayaep2061 Жыл бұрын
this is a great video, i love seeing people actually look into VAR and what it actually works in a game and in concorance with the the rules of the game rather than just making it a scapegoat for their team losing! great work being unbiased with the england match too, crushing to see that foul missed but such is life
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Thank you, I appreciate those comments. Even though it’s hard to accept defeat, England know we only have ourselves to blame, despite the decisions. We all have inherent bias and different perspective but we can also be humble and honest when our team lose 😁
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Here is the video for Morocco vs France: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ndV0ds1qvt2ZZH0.html
@Grimmer98 Жыл бұрын
02:00 You explained it right, but didn't VAR pick the wrong player to determine if its offside or not? It looks like Saudi Arabia's Nr. 13 kept Lautaro onside
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes a lot of people said that. It’s the angle we are looking at it; VAR have multiple angles so it would be a big surprise if they made that mistake
@AlejandroLapeyre Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey it would be great if you find more angles to determine if it was a mistake.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Hopefully we can find more angles to determine one way or another!
@foa0695 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey maybe if Argentina did not lose that, they would not have won
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
It’s possible. The loss seemed to bring the players together and they stepped up big time after that.
@momodolape Жыл бұрын
the argentina vs arabia martinez goal was valid! What happened there wasn't the arm, but rather that they compared the position to the wrong player, since the far left saudi defender is the one that keeps the goal onside, this was even confirmed by VAR's creator Nacho Tellado in an interview with Canal 13.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
In all of the replays and still shots I’ve seen, it’s unclear. VAR have many more angles, I wish they would release them so we can see. Obviously it makes no difference now but would be good to know if VAR truly did make that mistake with their semi-automated technology; it would be a surprise and a setback for them if they did get this wrong.
@gustavop7761 Жыл бұрын
Pff
@Runy95 Жыл бұрын
VAR's creator? Te la mamaste JAJAJAJA
@momodolape Жыл бұрын
@@Runy95 flashé inglaterra JAJAJAJ
@Runy95 Жыл бұрын
@@momodolape venias re bien igual
@FireAyasha Жыл бұрын
Why not make video about all mistakes that VAR did not intervened and by FIFA rules it should.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
They only intervene if the ref makes a clear and obvious error. They do check most incidents but we just don’t see the check on screen.
@cromania100 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey I think you should go more in depth especially with the Argentina pens that were awarded against Croatia and France and of course the Croatia Morocco 3rd place game a lot of wierd calls were made in that game.
@yaseenhashim2074 Жыл бұрын
@@cromania100 I think the arg vs crotia penalty while questionable didn't matter because they scored 2 more clear and obvious goals.that penalty didn't impact the match result in the end.
@yaseenhashim2074 Жыл бұрын
@@cromania100 if crotia scored one goal in that match. Then that penalty should have brought into question.
@cromania100 Жыл бұрын
@@yaseenhashim2074 yes of course Cro was horrible in that match, probably didnt deserve to go through but it also didnt deserve to have sus penalties called for Arg
@aidanjanemcintosh6919 Жыл бұрын
14:08 I love your wordings, "it's only controversial because it knocked Germany out"
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
😁
@thehusshisht1708 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey and i love u
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
🙏 cheers!
@-_Nuke_- Жыл бұрын
Yeah we all loved Japan :D
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
🙏🇯🇵
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Which decisions don't you agree with? What was the worst decision? Here is the link for Argentina vs France WC Final: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q9pzqKp03Niveqs.html
@joereynolds5476 Жыл бұрын
Why do you say arm away from the body is an unnatural position when it isn't?
@bruno9764 Жыл бұрын
Argentina vs croatia, netherlands penalties
@RJG7203 Жыл бұрын
@@bruno9764 Nothing wrong with Argentina vs croatia game. People are reaching so hard
@naZ11911 Жыл бұрын
Wow just wow you have taught me new stuff from the changes on the law of the game. Thank you for this detailed video. I really much enjoyed watching it. Definitely subscribing! Happy New Year! @FCE
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the kind words! Glad you enjoyed the video and welcome to the channel! HNY 👍
@sofiascalella5629 Жыл бұрын
i just read offside rules and more rules and you are completely correct on every decision. good job
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@babyjordanlalthenkaihaokip3035 Жыл бұрын
One of the underrated channel of all time...I love your knowledge..admire bro
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Thank you! I appreciate that 🙏
@babyjordanlalthenkaihaokip3035 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey 110 marks on football laws.. ❤️ from kukiland
@drift3426 Жыл бұрын
I wonder about the clash between Cavani and Seidu in 2nd half stoppage time, which I imagine is what got the Uruguay side all up in arms about var. Personally I don't think it was a penalty as Cavani intentionally steps in front of Seidu to try and draw a foul during that footrace.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
I did a video on that potential foul actually. Cavani does step in front of Seidu and goes down easily but you could still argue it's a possible penalty for the contact. Tough call!
@percheavycdq 8 ай бұрын
Brilliant in depth vid here mate
@PaulSpacey 8 ай бұрын
Cheers mate!
@United_Wings 5 ай бұрын
World Cup 3D VAR is the best we'll ever get, other than that we're finished
@grafix8780 Жыл бұрын
On the Argentina vs Saudi Arabia Offside one. What if they had looked at number 13 instead? Cause he seems to be further back than the guy right next Martinez
@lucagorosito3715 Жыл бұрын
They should've but VAR for some reason did not take him into account, making what was a legal goal, offside
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
It was talked about at the time by so many people; VAR check every defender and have multiple angles plus semi automated technology to check it. It’s not impossible to make that mistake but highly unlikely.
@ibrahimbennounaGmail Жыл бұрын
Very well done and explained. Pleasant to watch. Big up. Any videos about semi-finals and final?
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Thanks Ibrahim! Yes there are two videos on the final (part 1 and part 2) and also a more recent video looking at reviews which includes some semi final action. Check out the recent videos on my channel.
@epic8897 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey I think the Bruno Fernandes one was abit conversational, Hakimi legit pushed him from the back and there was also a handball on Morocco in the penalty area.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
@epic, the Bruno one was a close call. If the ref had given the pen, it’s unlikely that it would have been overturned after a VAR review. Hakimi made some contact but it’s difficult to tell how much although like the Di Maria situation, being behind someone is the worst possible position for a defender.
@epic8897 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey Agreed 👍 and also subbed
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Thanks! 👍
@joander9553 Жыл бұрын
6:20 so you are telling me that my country could have been in the round of 16 but a freaking error from the referee, It could have been my first time seeing them there AND IT WAS THE REFEREES F#CKING FAULT...this just makes me want to cry, we deserved better
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
It hurts but it happens all the time in football; decisions go against you and the costs can be great, especially in big tournaments like the WC 🫣
@caliboy09 Жыл бұрын
2:00 looks like Saudi 13 keeps Martínez onside
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Long running debate over that one. Now that we know VAR can make those clear errors, it is possible they got it wrong.
@kemonosworld4773 11 ай бұрын
The video is great, but one call is wrong. Lautaro wasn't offside against Saudi Arabia, VAR used the wrong defender to check if he was.
@PaulSpacey 11 ай бұрын
Thanks. It’s inconclusive based on the camera angles but it does appear they may have used the wrong player to determine offside.
@jamieturtle 9 ай бұрын
There should’ve been a penalty for England vs Iran just before the 10 minute mark
@markkuuss Жыл бұрын
Hey man can you do a video analysis of the game France-Morocco ? Apparently there are two penalties that should have been given to Morocco
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
The first one on Boufal was not a penalty. Hernandez has possession and while he goes into Boufal, the Moroccan is approaching him at speed and so VAR would not determine that to be a foul. I’ll look at doing a video in any case. Not sure what the second potential penalty was but I’ll have a look.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Here you go: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ndV0ds1qvt2ZZH0.html
@mattschmidt4001 Жыл бұрын
At 7:48 in the video, it shows the still picture of Germany/Spain Rudiger offsides, but in the still picture it is clearly visible that the ball had already been kicked! Is there a V.A.R. animated still picture? That brings up another question...how is the determining factor of the moment in time that the offsides is called? Does the ball telemetry record the movement which I could see it being a determining factor? But if the play is in motions, is it still a human call on "time and space" when the infraction occurs? The other question is, is the hand ball that Spain had towards the end of the game was clearly visible on the replay; but, it is not even questioned or brought up by anyone...why? The Japan goal against Spain still picture of the ball, are there more still frames? Because, that angle of that still picture isn't perfectly perpendicular in accordance with the goal post visual acuity! Thanks in advance for any clarification!
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
thanks for the questions. I watched the Ruddier replay in slow motion to be sure and he is 100% offside. Perhaps the still image I showed wasn't the ideal one to use. VAR use semi automated technology to figure out the exact point the ball leaves the foot although I don't know for sure exactly how accurate this is. I expect it is very accurate based on the number of cameras and angles they have available for reviews. With the Japan goal, it comes down to millimeters and a few frames; again VAR have access to more than we see on the screen and that's something that has to change; they need to show everything they are looking at for transparency.
@ryryhc Жыл бұрын
Underrated video!
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Thanks Ryan!
@mirokresonja8383 Жыл бұрын
Is there a video on all the wrong calls on the field and what can be done to eliminate/correct those with VAR? Messi's hand during the match with Netherlands, for example?
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
watch some of the recent videos, including the most popular VAR moments and the Netherlands vs Argentina review as the Messi handball is included. You cannot eliminate wrong calls completely. And remember, 'wrong' is subjective based on individual interpretation of the laws and what you consider a foul is.
@jamieturtle Жыл бұрын
I think the foul on Kane from Upamencano was a penalty. Although the contact was inside the area, the entirety of Kane’s body was inside the area when he went down. Also big mistake from the referee for the foul from Théo Hernandez on Mason Mount; the referee awarded a penalty and a yellow card, I think that was a red card because of a denial of a potential goal scoring opportunity.
@markbuikema7248 Жыл бұрын
I believe Ecuador goal against Netherlands was correctly disallowed, the offside player definitely impacted the goalkeeper
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Correct, he impacted the keeper from the first shot BUT the deflection is considered another phase and he doesn’t impact the keeper on this. Tricky one but I still think the officials got it wrong after reviewing it.
@neonidas1 Жыл бұрын
Broo rip pokand but also Szczęsny saved all the penalties
@tkr77 Жыл бұрын
In Lautaro's goal vs Saudi 1:57, there was another defender who was further behind Lautaro
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
No, I addressed this in other comments. That’s just the viewing angle.
@fabianaesquivel9050 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey the VAR creator HIMSELF said that was a goal. That Lautaro was in the right possition and there was another defender who was further behind Lautaro. Please look out for it.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
I’ve looked at it multiple times. Martinez was offside. The left back is not playing him onside; no idea what you are talking about with the VAR referee; he hasn’t spoken publicly about it as far as I know.
@ShoXwavee Жыл бұрын
no you lost the game
@rin_iz08 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey there is an evidence that the Offside VAR referee Abdelhak Etchiali showed tho
@rottd10s Жыл бұрын
1:58 🇸🇦 number 13 defender was the correct reference for offside.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
I’ve seen images and videos and still don’t see anything concrete to show that player was the correct reference. The image in my video is slightly misleading because of the angle.
@RainWolf2286 Жыл бұрын
I really disagree with some decisions, but my big concern is the criteria require to use VAR, and the inconsistency in the decisions made by the referees (without the VAR) from one game to the other, it looked like every referee read a different rule book, or had a different meeting (and video reference) about how to call for fouls. Some plays where called by the referees and/or VAR, and similar o the same plays in other games not only where not called, but where not even reviewed (even when it was a penalty/no penalty, goal/no goal, clear and obvious hand situation).
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
And your observations are fair; this is the biggest problem with referees and it’s not really their fault. They all have different experiences and perspectives and so they interpret the laws slightly differently. Consistency is what fans want but it’s very difficult to achieve across a wide spectrum of referees with different levels of experience. That’s why football and decisions by referees is so divisive!
@jamieturtle 9 ай бұрын
The fact that VAR checked 3 possible penalties in the first half in Canada vs Belgium😂
@PaulSpacey 9 ай бұрын
😉
@Tunde....Ballack Жыл бұрын
I never saw a video for the Saudi decisions individually, but do you think the foot of that player's foot used was really the furthest player back? I know illusions can happen from specific angles, but if we use the Saudi defender between the RCB and the LB, it becomes absolutely clear that the LB is behind. Do you think they got this one wrong from the perspective of using the wrong player as the furthest player back?
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
The angle appears to show left back playing Martinez onside but VAR have multiple angles and semi-automated technology. They don’t make mistakes on the measurements. They sometimes make mistakes on the application of subjective parts of decisions but not on the measurements; at least nothing I’ve seen so far shows they’ve made a clear mistake with an offside measurement anyway 👀
@Tunde....Ballack Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey Well I don't really know, saw several pictures with the lines being drawn and the left back being the furthest player back, and using the LCB as a reference, he really does look that way, but I guess until other angles are released (which will likely never happen), we won't know for sure
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes I saw another image with the lines drawn and it looks like the LB is playing Martinez onside but VAR have the use of all the cameras in the stadium. Would be nice to have it confirmed for sure.
@soufianechalouh5069 Жыл бұрын
France V Morocco had a couple of interesting cases: Boufal getting a yellow card instead of a penalty (as reported by Casillas and many famous players). Also Amallah getting held and pushed to the ground on a cross, similar to if not more obvious than Argentina's penalty, yet no VAR check in both decisions. Can you enlighten us, please?
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes I’ve included the Boufal incident in another video. It wasn’t a foul IMO based on the circumstances, especially considering Boufal’s motion (he is moving towards the ball at speed). It’s more of a collision than a foul, both players coming together. Amallah was held and based on previous penalties in the WC for the same thing, he should have been awarded a penalty for that. Inconsistent.
@soufianechalouh5069 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey oops I missed the Boufal explanation. Thank you for the details 😄
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
😁
@misterloqd4669 Жыл бұрын
Lautaro Martinez's goals were goals because his arm was offside. However, it has to be a part of your body legal to score a goal with.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Part of his shoulder/upper arm was offside; it was tight but the correct call.
@yoanwastaken Жыл бұрын
Why didn't they use VAR for the Semis and Finals? There were some very controversal situations for example the Argentina penalties.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
I did separate videos for those games; see the links in the description and some of the latest videos on my channel
@dontuakana7788 Жыл бұрын
honestly some var decisions were clearly outrageous. They still got some calls wrong even with the tech they had
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Because it’s still a subjective decision most of the time. Offside calls via technology and measurements are pretty much 100% correct but anything that involves the referees’ subjective decision making and interpretation is still going to divide opinion.
@yehaw4396 Жыл бұрын
People say Argentina vs France was rigged France vs England was the definition of rigged.
@samikdhar273 Жыл бұрын
1:57 the wrong Saudi defender is referenced by VAR to judge Martinez as offside.. Saudi Number 13 was the last defender at that point in time.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
It’s just the angle of the shot. The Saudi #13 isn’t playing Martinez onside; this has been checked.
@samikdhar273 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey draw a line and show it..
@samikdhar273 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey the "active play" rule is only for the attacker. For the defending side there is no relevance of "active play"
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes, I know that. I didn’t mention active play for the defender. There are a few images online with lines drawn but it’s almost impossible to tell. We have to trust VAR judgment in this situation as they have access to way more cameras and angles than we see.
@alhassanemam.2487 7 ай бұрын
Ngl now that we have seen man utd game vs wolves and the ref got suspended for not giving the pen the same pen situation between argentina vs poland as in both situations the goalkeepers didnt prevent players from playing the ball, we are safe to say the pen was correct in argentina vs poland (Both attackers played the ball before getting contact and the contact was there and the ball was still on field whether it was on air or ground)
@PaulSpacey 7 ай бұрын
Poland vs Arg penalty is still debatable for me. Those challenges are usually not given as fouls, especially with such little contact. But you can also legitimately argue a foul in the circumstances.
@engineeringnerds16 Жыл бұрын
Wrong decisions : Argentina penalty again Poland, portugal penalty against Uruguay.... Portugal penalty against ghana and england penalty against France where Kane missed d second one d mount was pushed by a shoulder... Even mbappe was shocked 😅 then that reaction.. !!!!
@sheikhsadiashfi9980 Жыл бұрын
Ya but from those above 4, only 2 were scored. So Argentina could not get the advantage same as England. So those did not get much viewed because no one suffered
@muazzamshaikh2049 Жыл бұрын
I just watched few videos in which they said that L Martinez goal vs Saudi should have been allowed as they considered the wrong player for offside line..
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
It was inconclusive from the angles we saw on TV; it would be a surprise if the technology failed but nobody has offered clear evidence to show the left back #13 was playing Alvarez onside.
@Sweegal Жыл бұрын
I heard from pundits that the witsel vs Canada challenge wasn't a foul because the Canadian purposely put his foot into witsel
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
And that’s always an argument that can be made. The ref has to decide whether the player initiates the contact or the opponent from behind/side makes the contact carelessly.
@anubhavidk Жыл бұрын
Thanks to Var for conducting one the most fairest world cups ever
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
👏
@RuleNo2NoNames Жыл бұрын
13:00 Japan goal against Spain.
@cristianrana4198 Жыл бұрын
I'm not with you in at least a couple of decisions: * Both non given penalties to Canada against Belgium can't be a "question mark". They were clearly penalties. In the first one it doesn't matter if Vertonghen touched the ball first, he then proceeded to made a clear foul without the ball to Buchanan, it was clearly a penalty. And also the second one, Witsel made a clear foul on Laryea, why wouldn't that be a penalty? * I strongly disagree in saying that the Saudi penalty against Poland is an error. The contact exists, it was a foul inside the box, that's a penalty. * In the game between Uruguay and Ghana, I think that both penalties should've been called the same. I mean, if the contact is "minor" to Nuñez, it was also minor from Rochet, so neither penalty should have been awarded. I think most of these disagreements that I have with your position came from (what I think) it's an error in what you consider should make the VAR intervene. In many cases you say that "since it wasn't a clear and obvious error, the VAR shouldn't call the ref" (for example, in the Saudi penalty), but the VAR protocol from the IFAB itself says: "A video assistant referee (VAR) is a match official, with independent access to match footage, who may assist the referee only in the event of a ‘clear and obvious error’ or ‘serious missed incident’ in relation to: ..." So if it wasn't a clear error but it still was a missed penalty, the VAR should call the ref. Anyway, great job dude doing this video! This is a really good content.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Thanks Cristian. Some insightful comments and questions. Of course we have a slightly different perspective and so it’s ok that we see it perhaps a little differently. The decisions you mention and subjective calls that are borderline IMO so you can legitimately argue either way with justification. My opinion is just that, an opinion. VAR will of course ask the referee to review an incident if they believe the ref has missed a penalty but they must have determined that this was not a penalty in the Belgium case with Verthonghen. He 100% makes contact with the player on follow through but his initial touch of the ball is what probably meant the VAR official was undecided, therefore didn’t suggest a review based on a clear error by the referee. Obviously it confused the issue further that the AR incorrectly awarded offside.
@TheFabo97 Жыл бұрын
I agree with most of the decisions but the tight ones, especially offsides are all debatable because of the VAR tolerance. In some cases VAR has a tolerance up to 30cm depending on the speed of the players. 11:37 For me, VAR should not be called when the decision is inside tolerance margins.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
It’s a very good point. VAR claimed that their semi automated technology made it more accurate for offside decisions because of the data points for each player. Like every system, it’s not infallible.
@ivanschweizer9146 Жыл бұрын
The problem with Lautaro's goal against Saudi Arabia was that I think they chose the wrong player to compare with, number 13 I believe would've put him onside.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
It’s based on the angle we are viewing. VAR would have checked that via their semi automated technology system. It’s not impossible to make a mistake but it’s highly unlikely they missed that. Nobody has been able to show a clear angle proving that 13 is further back than the defender who they used in the VAR review.
@huntingtick9938 Жыл бұрын
Dude u forgot about the livakovic “penalty” vs Argentina, i think u should Review that cause IT was the reason that the croatian players didn’t Play Well alter it
@methatis3013 Жыл бұрын
This is only about the decisions in which var participated. In this incident, var stayed completely silent
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
I reviewed this in a more recent video. It was a foul based on the keeper impeding the progress of the attacker.
@ramibaghdadi1255 Жыл бұрын
That was 100 percent a foul by Livakovic, he made no contact with the ball and then trips Alvarez, impeded his movement from going around him by sticking his leg out. This isn't basketball, defenders aren't allowed to set "screens" or blocks on attackers, they have to win the ball.
@fightingforce8498 Жыл бұрын
@@ramibaghdadi1255 keep dreaming 🤣
@ThisAbdullah Жыл бұрын
U should add Moroccan and France semi finals possible penalty
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
thanks, I'll do an additional video on this. Definitely a potential penalty shout...
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Here it is: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ndV0ds1qvt2ZZH0.html
@eruisuma18 9 ай бұрын
1:57 Here the issue is that the wrong player was taken, the one they would have to refer to is player 13, not the one next to Lautaro.
@PaulSpacey 9 ай бұрын
Plenty of discussion about this at the time. No clear angle to show 13 was the deepest defender but it’s possible they got it wrong.
@eruisuma18 9 ай бұрын
@@PaulSpacey I think that's where the controversy comes from. Another case that was not discussed is the possible penalty for a foul by the Saudi player (I think it was also player n13) on Otamendi in the second half.
@DreanPetruza Жыл бұрын
2:00 I guess we'll never know if the Saudi player #13 was making the Argentine on-side or not.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Without more angles, it’s unclear. I’d love someone to show more footage to clear it up.
@Maji0.07 Жыл бұрын
11:56 what did ya say which part of body you could score with
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Green part of the graphic, which is the upper arm (determined by the part level with the armpit)
@GamerKru1996 Жыл бұрын
Morocco going to the semi finals in the 2022 world cup is similar to South Korea reaching the semi finals of the 2002 world cup.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
👏
@javieralfaro3490 7 ай бұрын
Te faltó analizar el penal no cobrado por falta que le hicieron a Otamendi dentro del área en ese mismo partido en el minuto 62 y esa fue más clara que el agarrón a Paredes y no cobraron penal, qué opinas?
@PaulSpacey 7 ай бұрын
Subjective opinions. Some think it was a foul, others not. That’s the same for every game. I only analyzed every VAR decision.
@helpstopanimalabuse8153 Жыл бұрын
Great video, as a Football/Soccer fan (When is it called Soccer & When is it called football?). It explained a lot to a casual Football fan. I still don't understand when can VAR become involved. Is it the Ref's call? Could you explain? I can not remember which team was involved but my favourite moment was when a player took a dive pretending to be injured & about 10 seconds later when he heard the Ref's whistle assuming the other player was being booked he shot straight up & when the Ref noticed that the Ref gave him a Yellow card. I like Soccer & used to play it at school but to see these morons diving when another player just brushes a player & sometimes there is no contact at all, it is embarrassing for soccer & turns fans off completely. A idea-If a player has been identified as diving without doubt there should be a special "Sin Bin" just like Rugby League where you are sent off the field for 10 minutes or there is another colored card say "Black" where you serve 10 minutes off the field & are you accrue demerit points. Once you have accrued a certain amount you are suspended for a certain amount of matches. Players hate being suspended so this might be a good deterrant.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed the video! Soccer is more of a US word but it’s used in other countries also. Football or Futbol are the more common words in most countries with a strong football heritage. VAR reviews all major incidents leading to goals along with offside and anything the ref may have missed in terms of dangerous fouls for example. It is not used for smaller decisions as the idea is to allow the game to flow without too many interruptions. If VAR see something they believe the referee needs to look at, they suggest a full review for the referee at the pitchside monitor or sometimes they just give the ref direct info so he can make a decision without needing the monitor. Players love to go down and convince the ref they’ve been fouled; it didn’t used to be this way but the game has changed in the last 10-15 years. For American football and Rugby fans, soccer players probably look like wimps (rightly so most of the time). The ‘sin bin’ is something that has been talked about for a while now and I think most fans would actually like it to be introduced. We’ll see!
@averageboy8823 Жыл бұрын
So underrated
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
😉
@77-Cold Жыл бұрын
Ecuador would have been the first to qualify to R16 if the goal wasn't disallowed wrongfully against Netherlands.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes that was a very harsh decision. It’s subjective based on the referees perspective on the situation but it does feel like they got that one wrong
@diegorz5612 Жыл бұрын
In the 2min there is another player whichs enable. Not which VAR analised
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes it looks that way but when the camera position is adjusted, the left back is not actually playing him onside. This was checked.
@lolosaurus9431 Жыл бұрын
Hey i am wondering about penalty at croatia and argentina
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Correct decision in circumstances. Keeper impedes progress of attacker with contact. Attacker gets to ball first so is essentially in possession.
@caliboy09 Жыл бұрын
Confusing for the first one because no player is offside when the ball is passed to them
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Right, not from the free kick but the player is offside from the subsequent header.
@caliboy09 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey I thought it wasn’t an offense to be offside if you don’t have the ball
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
It’s not. But if you then return from an offside position and touch the ball, you become active and offside is given. That was the case here.
@BlyatimirPootin Жыл бұрын
What about when Maguire was fouled in the box in the Iran game?
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Clear foul but was ignored by the ref and VAR. That’s the biggest complaint; lack of consistency awarding those kinds of fouls; Argentina got one and Iran got one against England in that same game. Refs need to be more consistent in that respect.
@fabianmazuranic4768 Жыл бұрын
You didn't explane penalty in Arg - Cro, and potencial penalty for Croatia in match for 3rd place
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
I did another video on this and explained in some of the comments. Check out my other videos (recent ones with World Cup reviews where my face is on the thumbnail).
@justin8911 Жыл бұрын
What about Tunisia's penalty against Denmark? The Danish defender certainly touched the ball with his hand and his hand was in a strange position. That penalty could have sent Tunisia to the next round.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
that was included in this video no? It was a foul before the handball for a push.
@justin8911 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey nope that was Denmark penalty, Tunisia should got a penalty before the one you added it
@yophtahealemayehu5872 Жыл бұрын
Argentina vs Croatia penalty given to Argentina was it legitimate
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes, commented on this quite a few times now; the keeper didn’t get the ball and impeded Alvarez so it was a penalty.
@mariomonterroso3093 Жыл бұрын
netherlands vs argentina. really argentina had help from the refferes.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
The ref was poor in that game; not sure you can say he helped Argentina. He made some poor decisions and lost control.
@Rohin98 11 ай бұрын
There are lot of diving foul given against Serbia and against Argentina in Argentina vs Australia! Lot of fouls denied by the ref against. Senagal
@PaulSpacey 11 ай бұрын
Most of the decisions were pretty spot on but some of them were questionable.
@frederickdouglass7961 11 ай бұрын
Where is Argentina Vs Croatia, Netherlands, France etc ?
@PaulSpacey 10 ай бұрын
I did additional videos for the last few games of the tournament, check my channel.
@yuki-zh3bt Жыл бұрын
There actually are some controversial decisions made by VAR review, but it helps referees well I think. tbh, as japanese, I cannot complain about VAR judgement. It absolutely saves us for "1 milimeter" lol
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Correct. It definitely helps referees. The biggest issues to improve are speed and transparency.
@rozhao937 Жыл бұрын
Was Alvarez fouled by Livakovic in Argentina vs Croatia?
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes, I address it in this video. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qdZ8isSg2tWZj30.html
@GherdanSports Жыл бұрын
4:27 could you be so kind to explain how in your opinion how can this be a 50-50 call (but then in the video of the analysis of the final you deem the action on Di Maria to be a foul). In all respect to me they seem almost identical 😊
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Not identical. Witsel is to the side and also slightly behind Laryea. Dembele is directly behind Di Maria, impossible to get the ball from that position. Regardless of that, remember that any decision is subjective based on the referees’ perspective, inherent bias and experience. I made a video specifically explaining this logic so people can understand why we argue so much 😁
@GherdanSports Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey i respectfully disagree. I do not believe the position (behind totally in Dembele case or behind and a bit laterally aside in Witsel case or any other whatsoever position) matters but whether it was contact or not. You as an expert know very well that the same standard applies to direct free kicks whether they are in the box (case in which it is a penalty kick) or 95 yards away from your own goal. In the video you have a picture with Witsel’s foot on the opponent’s calf (which is absolutelty enlightening). In all respect that contact is not within the laws of the game, it is not allowed to kick or trip the opponent’s calf with your foot. If anything, to me the contact on Di Maria is lighter and subject to even more constroversy than this (for sake of clarity i agree totally that Di Maria penalty was rightfully awarded). All in all, while i agree that due to some circumstances (speed of play, lawful contact until the foot on calf) this decision is not the easiest to make and the video replay may even be a bit decieving than the picture you posted, I would however respectfully expect from an expert as you are (super kudos to you for all the videos you made, such an underrated channel) to reconsider it. I believe that if you judge based on that picture alone you can’t continue to say it’s a 50-50 call. You even said “witsel clearly makes contact and doesn’t get a touch on the ball”. Then how come that contact without touching the ball with Witsel boot on the opponent’s calf can be anything else than a direct free kick (and since it is in the box, a penalty)
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
I’ve just watched the replays of the Witsel incident again as I want to be clear. For some reason Laryea steps across Witsel with his foot; he’s not in front of him but partially to the side which makes it different to Dembele. And of course the same standard should apply to fouls inside and outside of the penalty area but we both know that many referees treat them differently, either subconsciously or intentionally. Laryea appears to be openly looking for the penalty and embellishes the contact; I expect VAR considered that. It’s still a potential penalty and depends on your subjective view of it. Just watched it again before finishing this comment and Laryea 100% throws his arms forward and embellishes the contact; kind of makes it look too obvious that he is playing for the foul. Still a tough call so I’m sticking with my 50/50 shout 😉
@GherdanSports Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey thanks for your input. I assume FIFA may not see it as i saw it since after my comment i did some research and the same VAR ref was appointed to the wc final. With this being said tho, i have a friend who is a football ref who was at the wc and i’ll be reaching out to him to tell him his pov and i’ll come back. I’m stubborn and i feel my interpretation may be right but if he gonna say like you i will be waiving the white flag and admit i’m wrong in the way of seeing it as clear cut as i do. And as said the video is less clear than the pic on that i agree. I’ll be back 😁
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Haha fair enough! I’m always open to changing my mind if better footage or angles show up; it’s all about opinions, even for professional referees. Thanks for the input and good questions!
@jaimelannister8160 Жыл бұрын
Idk if it’s jst my bias or something, I jst felt that most of the decision favoured Argentina this entire WC . I’m not saying all VAR decisions are wrong , it jst feels that they only intervene when it favours Argentina.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
I do think it sometimes feels this way when a team wins a big tournament. It could be bias or it could also be true! Argentina had some ref and VAR calls go their way for sure but I believe they also played very good football and deserved to win.
@IAmNotBob. Жыл бұрын
1:55 thats incorrect,there was another defender that was closer to his goalkeeper than Lautaro was
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
That’s just the angle of the still shot. Look closely.
@micharainczuk607 Жыл бұрын
Szczęsny saved a shot while Messi bumped into him and dived. How was this a penalty?
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Wasn’t a penalty IMO; the ref decided otherwise.
@micharainczuk607 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey Szczęsny humbled Messi saving that penalty
@-Pakman- Жыл бұрын
So many ppl still rly b crying even tho it’s already over
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
That’s football. Some people can never let it go, even after a loss. That’s part of why we love this game so much; it’s a religion…or is it a cult? Same thing?! 😳
@f3d3nr37 Жыл бұрын
I saw many saying that the penalty from the Polish goalkeeper against Messi is a penalty because the ball was still in play and in the ronaldo vs messi match they give ronaldo the same penalty 
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes the ball was still in play but usually in minor collisions like that with the keeper, a penalty would not be given unless the player was stopped from playing the ball (or heavily/intentionally hit by the keeper). Similar situation in the so-called Ronaldo vs Messi match, yes. They wanted Ronny to score 😉
@danutobch1365 Жыл бұрын
The referee who refereed the England vs France game was either biased to France or he just did not call fouls. I mean there were clear fouls on England’s players. The one where Saka got fouled, it should have been a free kick and as a result France’s first goal should not have counted. The second one was a clear foul on Kane, even if it is not a penalty, it is at least a free kick. I really wish there was a better referee for the England vs France game.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
I’m biased because I’m English. But watching those incidents, you have to feel the referee either has inherent bias or simply had a poor performance (along with his AR) because both Saka and Kane were clearly fouled. VAR would only intervene if Kane was 100% inside the penalty area and they couldn’t determine that in fairness.
@wsp2000 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey Isn't the problem with world cup that they have to include referees from all around the world not only the best? For exemple the one african referee who in his career ended one match at 85th minute.
@wsp2000 Жыл бұрын
That was sampaio. He refereed Poland vs Saudi Arabia and was very poor. I'm polish and I'm sure he should give my team a red card after Matty Cash elbow. He get trigger happy with yellows at one point and he gave Saudis penalty which was bad call acording to this video. Poor, uneven refereeing.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Oh I forgot Sampaio officiated that game! He was the guy who had a shocking game for England vs France. It’s tough but we all accept most refereeing mistakes because we know it’s just part of the game unfortunately.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes it’s an issue because clearly not all of the referees are of the same standard and experience. That guy who ended the AFCON game at 85 mins is a good example 👀
@echelonanglo2226 Жыл бұрын
For Argentina there's a question mark on your behalf for the Paredes penalty, even when you can clearly see and you say the defender was grabbing him, then for the penalty against Messi vs Poland you clearly see the goalies slapping Messis' face and you deemed that one as an incorrect call. Yet when you're prompted about what seems to be an error in taking the line of the incorrect Saudi defender against Lautaro Martinez, you are quick to come out and defend VAR and the "impossibility" of such mistake happening. That bias does not help with your credibility mate.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
my opinion is based on my perspective and interpretation of the laws; just like the referees' decision is based on what he sees. And again, your retort is based on your perspective and bias; appreciate your comment but has nothing to do with my credibility mate ;-)
@echelonanglo2226 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey But you are suppossedly presenting facts and unbiased opinions as the basis of your analysis, which would be fine, until you mix that with claims such as "the possibility of that VAR error happening is slim to none, so i don't think it could happen" completely dismissing in a heartbeat that Argentina onside claim. At the same time for the goalie slap on Messi you say "it happens all the time, so nah" while you claim it was an incorrect call. You can present these with your perspective or bias and that would be ok. I'm just calling out how you portray this "analysis" as based on facts or unbiased opinions, when they're clearly not. Hence the losing credibility statement. After reading your comments and watching the video, your analysis might as well be a random fan's opinion in your local pub.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Again, it seems you are not intelligent enough to interpret what I said before. Your opinion of my ‘bias’ is simply your opinion, it’s how you see it. I’m giving my own unbiased opinion (my subconscious bias is towards England, so I have no skin in the game for any of these other decisions). Just because you don’t agree, doesn’t affect my credibility. I’d genuinely be interested in seeing a video or hearing some in-depth expert analysis from you. Any chance of that? 🤡
@echelonanglo2226 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey ahhh, now attacking my intelligence because of my critique. On your way to became a prominent youtuber buddy!! I do not make videos, does that make me unable to comment on yours? What's sad is that mine was an honest observation, you lose credibility when you present biased nonsense as unbiased analysis, and you will get call out on it. And getting offended for being called out says more about your potential for improvement (or rather lack there of in your case) than it says about me, a random viewer, possibly a potential subscriber. Not a good start mate.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Read the thousands of comments I’ve replied to mate; not only am I open to critique, I’ve changed my mind and opinion when presented with new evidence or footage. Your comment was simply your opinion where you decided to attack my objectivity because you disagreed with my analysis. Your inability to discern what I was saying in a previous comment was what prompted my intelligence quip as it seems clear you didn’t understand what I was explaining. I can’t help you with that. Please don’t patronize me though; critique is necessary for improvement in any endeavor but when it comes to trolls and arrogance, I just call it out for the BS that it is. If that hurts your precious feelings, again that’s not my problem. I appreciate the exchange 😉
@ivankapetanovic4070 Жыл бұрын
VAR should've at least checked the foul on gvardiol vs marokko. It's also controversial if that was enough impact for a foul but they should've at least checked it. What's the point if they don't look at goal opportunity events
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
They did check it but didn’t recommended a full review to the ref. I thought it was a penalty but the explanation from officials was that Gvardiol embellished his fall and made it a few steps after the contact. Debatable.
@ivankapetanovic4070 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey even so if you tackle someone with a clear opportunity as his than it other cases not only would've been a penalty but a red card for tactical foul aswell. And since he didn't include that scenario and I didn't recall them checking i, I just thought they didn't bother like they most of the times do
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes referees take into account whether the player exaggerates or delays going down. I don’t agree with this approach if it’s clearly a foul, as I believe this incident was.
@pidjon333 Жыл бұрын
wasn't argentina penalty against croatia controversal?
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
No, I’ve answered this in comments and a separate video. Keeper fouled Alvarez; I guess you could call it controversial but it’s a foul based on the circumstances.
@vjay4297 Жыл бұрын
The ultimate question for you: If VAR never made any mistakes in ENG vs. FRANCE, do you believe that it would have come home??
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Unlikely. Our approach to games is conservative because the coach is that way inclined. We’ve hardly beaten any ‘top’ teams for years.
@mcborgors7766 Жыл бұрын
Bruh the Canada V Belgium games ref was mega questionable
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
yes some strange decisions in that game
@jaanu2222 Жыл бұрын
no lautaro martinez offside goal was the wrong call , just like VAR you were referencing it from the defender closer to martinez but everyone ignored number 13 Al-Shahrani's foot was making martinez on side , if they used tradinional lines technology then that would make the right decision and saudi wouldn't at least have won that day , but regardless everything happened was for argentina's own good if saudi didn't defeated argentina they wouldn't improved themselves that early blow triggered and exposed the fault in their style and they've improved it at really early and that's why they've won the WC
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
I’ve not seen any other images that show 13 was further back than the player VAR used. They have a crazy number of reference points for every individual player using their semi automated technology; would be shocking if it was wrong!
@jamesyugioh2944 Жыл бұрын
Ok
@a.j.gallegos2191 Жыл бұрын
Wait, you skipped the most inportant part of the Saudi vs Argentina on lautaros offside. You dont mention how they use the wrong player to mark the line.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
They didn't use the wrong player. It's the angle of the video and still shots that make it seem like #13 is further back. VAR have way more cameras and angles than we see.
@Truetoself3838 Жыл бұрын
Very good video! I still think the ref made too many mistakes in the Eng vs Fra game, to not be deliberate! The very yellow card on Hendo for supposed foul on M-baby was clearly a ref cheating! Hendo did not even touch M-baby and M-baby went diving like it’s the Olympics!! Eng should have won!
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Decisions seemed to go against England in that game but we only have ourselves to blame for not winning. Ref poor performance yes, but still missing a pen and conceding poor goals is England’s fault
@amjadsiddig2085 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey and bad subs too, you're a class act for admitting this props to you
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yeah the subs! He made them way too late; Southgate is a good guy but far too conservative as a coach unfortunately.
@Truetoself3838 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey I’ve been saying that since euros! Should have won that too but was not open enough to playing to his teams strength because it is his weakness. He is a diplomat and wants to FA president or something. England needs an asshole to lead the side they have! The team has too much talent to be be so poorly lead! And them boys too British to change from the coaches script in the game… (by the way too British is not being disrespectful, just me saying that you guys are very polite)
@amjadsiddig2085 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpaceyRight, and I remember he made the same mistake in the Euros too. Why wouldn't you put grealish to further disrupt the French defense? And I was screaming at the TV like why take off Saka of all people?? I think England would've had a good shot against France if Southgate played it smarter
@Jef24x7 Жыл бұрын
I like how Varame As$ costed France the Wc🤣
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
🍑
@ridoan777 4 ай бұрын
Where is Argentina vs Netherland match. Clear Rigged for Argentina 😂 What a Penalty and why Referee don't give Messi Red card?😂
@PaulSpacey 4 ай бұрын
Reviewed that game plus other semi and final in different videos.
@zothanpuiapachuau896 Жыл бұрын
There are more than thousand error n mistakes made by the VAR, they act like they are incharge of the full game, this kind of system should be revised n updated again, cos if they intervene in every case there is no need of a referee n lines man/girls....The referee should take more than 90% incharge of the game, and he ever needs an assistant he or she can requested for a VAR...
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
You basically described what happens. VAR only intervenes at specific moments according to the protocol and the ref makes the ultimate decision anyway.
@pt2096 Жыл бұрын
12:31 Correct decision to include Lukaku 😂😂
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
lol :-)
@MihailParshin Жыл бұрын
Before even watching the clip, I have to say something. No matter VAR or not, matchfixing won´t stop. We can argue as long as we want, we can make all explainations possible, but there will always be ´mistakes´.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Of course there will always be mistakes. And if a referee makes an intentional ‘mistake’, how would we know? 🤔
@MihailParshin Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey We can´t know everything, but sometimes is visible. When you have 1 referee making mistakes in multiple matches against or for some teams, that isn´t coincidence. Or if 1 teams gets favourable dicitions in a row in multiple matches. Those things can´t get away, although lot of the fans turn blind when it´s their team in favour of the calls. But I just say that no matter how we look them, most of the penalties today are garbage. A lot of them can be given, but also can be not given. And both is right. Some hand balls also can be given and can not be given in the same time.
@MihailParshin Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey And btw I didn´t see anything for all the Argentina calls. To me that one against Netherlands is in the line of the box, it should be foul, not penalty. The one with Croatia is very arguable, because the attacker trew himself into the goalkeeper, it was visible from the replays how the keeper tried to stay behind and make every possible effort to not touch the argentinian. To me that is not a penalty. And also the penalty in the final is just pathetic, there was a very slide touch on the socks between the 2 players. And the penalty for France in the end is quastionable, because that handball wasn´t intentional and it wasn´t stopping that ball from going into the net. So here are 4 penalties, very contraversial. But they weren´t in the video.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
They’ve been addressed in other videos Mihail. And I don’t agree with you unfortunately but that’s ok; we have completely different perspectives so we are literally watching different things. The Alvarez and Croatia keeper challenge is an easy one IMO, but that’s just with my experience and perspective. Yours is different.
@MihailParshin Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey Ok, haven't seen other clip. And here says Every VAR.
@samayrainashortss Жыл бұрын
Worst referee of worldcup was the referee from ENG VS FRANCE and ARG VS NETHERLANDS
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Both had poor games.
@muhamadarif1498 Жыл бұрын
that Ref and linesman for England v France are one of the worst ref in this WC..
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
It’s interesting because he clearly didn’t want to get involved and make decisions; I do think with VAR some officials are now almost scared to make a decision and prefer to leave it and wait for VAR to intervene. It’s not good in that respect.
@asupit1 Жыл бұрын
VAR definitely helps ref in many ways. But this sport more or less requires some level of drama and natural decision or POV of the ref. The offside technology completely makes the game less interesting and less "human". Yes it probably be more "just" and "fair". But getting offside for having your damn butt a bit too far outside is annoying. I think the rule must be adjusted to make the game and tech more human. Otherwise, just use robot with a whistle.
@arifulislam6987 Жыл бұрын
Explain the Croatia goalkeeper foul in Argentina vs croatia match fifa 22
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Both players going for the ball, Argentina player gets to the ball first, keeper crashes into him and commits a foul, impeding his progress. If the keeper touched the ball first, almost certainly not a foul in that case but the forward touches it first so is essentially in possession. Not massively different to Boufal incident vs France but the opposite happened as the Hernandez got to the ball first and him and Boufal then collided.
@toni_sushi7164 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey GREAT EXPLANATION the keeper also wasnt fully planted like ppl r saying he was, he lunged in the opposite direction of the ball and his arms werent even fully extended, it looked so clear to me the only iffy pen was the one against poland but scezny saved that one anyways
@engineeringnerds16 Жыл бұрын
Even keepers right leg was also out... Although d intention was to save d ball and not to tackle Alvarez.... But Alvarez got d ball first...!!!
@dinamonaravno9023 Жыл бұрын
What about Argentina vs Croatia pen?
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
It was a penalty based on the circumstances; I had to address this in another video and in lots of comments. Goalkeeper ‘impedes with contact’
@dinamonaravno9023 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey what about the corner that should've been when perisic was crossing or shooting I don't remember it right, Croatia had the control of the game until that pen
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
I don’t remember that incident. Did the pen come right after that?
@dinamonaravno9023 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey yeah, ball goes to goal kick, and they score immediately
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
🙈
@caliboy09 Жыл бұрын
There are more VAR decisions from Argentina vs Saudi
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Which ones?
@caliboy09 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey Lautaro and Messi’s disallowed goals, don’t know if VAR was used though
@lukinhopoki8955 Жыл бұрын
Croatia vs Morocco foul on Gvardiol?
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Yes this was a foul IMO but it seems the VAR officials didn’t feel it was an error by the referee, probably because of Gvardiol embellishing contact and going down theatrically a few steps after the contact. Still a foul for me.
@weyu7060 Жыл бұрын
From 1/8 finals almost no var moments. ??
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
Check the description; I added moments and reviews for some additional games.
@weyu7060 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey check. There are just a few var moments after the poule games. Suspicious.
@PaulSpacey Жыл бұрын
@@weyu7060 perhaps. but sometimes games just don't have as many incidents requiring VAR checks
@weyu7060 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulSpacey doesn't seem to me. Especially in the knockout phase it gets heated. Could be that fifa didn't want to interrupt the game as much as possible. It is also remarkable that hardly a referee was corrected.
The Purist Football
Рет қаралды 680 М.
VS Football Edit
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
⚽️WIZARD⚽️
Рет қаралды 513 М.
GANGSTER MUSIC
Рет қаралды 4,2 МЛН