Somebody tell me the timestamp, please?

@@miami9819 42:12

@@natpire3851 thanks :)

Yeah, it's pretty great!!! One of my other favorites is from TV Sins video on Peanuts' "The Great Pumpkin". Linus: "There are three things I've learned never to discuss with people, religion, politics, and The Great Pumpkin." Jeremy: "Strangely in 2019, these are somehow all the same topic."(3:08) I don't know why, but that one really got me. ☺

SOMEONE PLEASE LISTEN: yo but like Harry is the antagonist in the philosophers stone and flamel and I think his wife die as a result of his stupidity. If he had stayed in his room, quirrel would never have been able to get to the stone...

So many problems books turned to movies have could have been solved by turning the books into tv shows. Way too much needs to be cut to fit everything into a movie.

I literally just left the exact same comment only to scroll one down and find this lol the whole time I was dying inside like there's freaking muffliato for the anti eavesdropping spell.. There's so many things that were answered in the books but not the movie I had no idea until I watched this either

Yes

You are 100% correct. However I would argue they are great movies. Not fully accurate to the books at all but solid movies

As much as I agree with you, you’ll have a hard time finding a new Harry without getting lunched by Daniel Radcliffe fans

Does fit the character though.

That makes the scene even better for me

Y'know what, fair enough

And retake of a scen doesn't happen?

@@trolletuva Obviously it didn't as it gave Lucius a darker side to the character. It has been confirmed by numerous people, including Isaacs and Daniel Redclife, that this was pure imrpovisation on Isaacs' part, just like the previous scene and Harry's famous line "Don't worry. I will" which was also improvised on the spot. Isaacs has claimed many times since that he was legitimately impressed with the young actor with how he handled this scene.

I'm happy you understand the entire point of those things being sins is because the movie should stand on its own. I'm sure you've read the other comments and know why.

Luckily HBO is making a tv show version of Harry Potter that will follow the books word for word.

bro I actually got mad at some of these sins XD. I recently read all the books again and know everything fresh in my mind and it triggered me so much

LOL Yeah, you counted half huh?

@@Itsuomi-Io Yea hahaha I mean if you watch the movies without reading the books I 100% understand this but when you know it all it's hella triggering XD

No they didn't show us how Fred die!!!

Actually. the biggest sin is how forgotten Neville Longbottom is in the franchise. He's just as important as Harry.

@@deltableu - Is he really, though? Does he have an insanely large role in the books? Or is he just important because of how his existence affected Snape (avoiding book spoilers here)?

@@deltableu they just kept out the parts that if harry had died as a baby he would have been the "chosen one" but since harry didn't die, it's not relevant to the story. The peeves stuff is sad since his scenes were filmed for the first movie.

@@xxANTIFA That's like totally not true. Neville is a little bit significant only because he had the same "compatibility" with most of the Prophesy conditions as Harry... _apart from being chosen by Voldemort_ himself (imprecise quote: "and the Dark Lord will mark him as equal"). Even if that choice was a coin flip on the Voldie side, it still was a choice, and without that crucial detail Neville significance falls apart. If Harry had died that night then the Prophesy would've been fulfilled (imprecise quote: "one of them die at the hand of the other"), not magically transferred onto another child.

Never seesn any ogff the movires, but Im still laughing art this one!

Hagrid's punishment for unleashing spiders is to hang out with spiders?

@@MBison-im2qy oh my gosh, you're right

And you morons fail to realize how that punishment makes so much sense. If you punish someone by forcing them to do that very thing they think they like but with dangerous consequences, they're gonna stop enjoying that thing and thus never doing it again.

Very contrived reason to shoehorn in Harry seeing the unicorn blood drinking and meeting Firenze.

They could make a Harry Potter TV Series where each episode is a chapter of the books like The Lord of the Rings The Rings of Power, Game of Thrones and Game of Thrones House of the Dragon.

@@Cartman254 Funny you should say they they just announced a Harry Potter show in the works

​@Orion-V Right? I'm so conflicted

It's genuinely stupid how much the movies cut out

he literally reacted to a deleted scene

This legitimately pissed me off. They split the last book into 2 movies, wasted an hour of runtime in the first installment, then decided they didn't have time for a quick, informative, and narratively satisfying scene at the end of the second.

That should’ve literally doubled ALL sins assigned. (Including ones they might’ve forgiven between.)

And why did they have to be on the bridge.. why not in the headmasters office like in the book. Why did he have to break it. Dummbbbb

They did in Deathly Hallows pt.1. It might have been a deleted scene. I watched the movies On Demand and apparently they were the extended versions so I saw a bunch of 'new' scenes. Probably should have left that one in there.

to track what?

@@KafshakTashtak Who said it.

@@KafshakTashtak to track anyone who says his name or rather dares say his name

First time am hearing this honestly didn't know

I literally died at that.

Yeah, I had to go "oh shit" at that one, lmao.

I had to do a double take.

Pfft... I went "lol hol' up"

timestamp

Slightly competend? And Flitwick is incompetent or what?

@@Orion-V I mean, we can logically assume that someone took the register and told her. They can't show every small detail, the target audience is capable of basic inferential comprehension.

​@@sahanaiyer6472 Considering how much unimportant stuff they had time for, yeah they very much could've shown that "little detail". It's not the audience's job to figure it out themselves, it's the movie's job to show it and make it clear. If they choose not to, dont get triggered for someone pointing out that they didn't.

@@bdaarmy9736It’s definenty not their job to make every little tiny detail extremely, abundantly clear. They trust their audiences fill in the blanks. Feel free to fill it however you want to. That’s a fun part of the creator-audience relationship. And he’s only pointing it out because it’s literally his job to nitpick for fun, not because anyone was actually confused.

Clever 😮❤🎉

It's cuz the writers favorite was Hermione. He was biased and gave her a lot of Harry and Ron's good moments

@@Chris-ks4sw Could also be down to the fact that Emma Watson is better at acting than Rupert Grint and therefore the movies were rearranged. And Ron is really not that badass tbh. I think they portrayed the characters quite good in the movies. Only character that stands out is Umbridge and that is because Imelda Staunton nails that role to perfection.

@@Chris-ks4sw Hermione I'd rge best out of the 3

Exactly! The movies did Ron so dirty! Ron was the brains of their group, Hermione was annoying and Harry was kind of a brat.

@@mukke9728 Hermione got better but she was really awkward first few movies. They all got better. Harry had some great scenes in 5 and 6. Ron got a lot better too but by that point they had already ruined his character so they couldnt go back.

This is extremely true, I never even realized that

Almost like it's an unfair charge that is later dropped because the ministry is trying to expel harry and normally using magic in front of your family who know about magic wouldn't be a problem.

They were already privy to the magical world when they had to take on the responsibility of raising Harry. It was in the letter tucked inside of his blanket. Dudley however was our of the loop about it, including Harry before Hagrid told him. So the enchanted letter wouldn’t have been new to them as muggles who were currently begrudgingly raising a wizard. Also by this time Harry is already three years into school, so they would be used to things like this by now, not comfortable with it, but used to it.

i know!

No, that's just a new topic you wanted to raise, and for some reason you thought the best way to do it was the passive aggressive "you forgot" whine.

The Philosophers Stone*

@@NyalBurns there's different titles in the US and UK

@@thatguyanderson I understand

The hero we all need. Thank you sir 🫡

“Neville reaches deep down to his British roots and conquers India” 42:12

buddy, it is spelled 'heroine'. lol

@@aumhren3480 Hermione is her name, which I did spell incorrectly, but I wasn't trying to say "heroine". If I actually wanted to type out heroine, then I would've also added "the" before it and H wouldn't have been capitalized. Stick to Slovene. With that being said, I recommend you stop watching these shitty-ass CinemaSins videos.

I thought its spelled Cocaine

@@aumhren3480 My comment didn't go through, probably cause I said that you shouldn't watch videos by these guys. Anyway, I did spell Hermione incorrectly, so I fixed it. If I had wanted to say heroine though, I wouldn't have capitalized H and I would've put "the" before the word. But I didn't. Stick to Slovene.

Yeah, I laughed or chuckled at Jeremy's remarks more than usual with this one. 🙂

@@BennyLlama39 yeah, i mean I'm a fan of harry potter but Jeremy got me laughing with this video 😁

@@BennyLlama39 there's something about his vocal delivery in these earlier videos that nails the chilled but sarcastic nature of this stuff lmao

I thought that was because of chocolate

@@rachael6855 Yeaah it was

/thathappened

No, that's because he kept sneaking chocolate and sweets onto the set and they melted and ruined the robes so eventually all pockets were sewn shut

Sooo many people for this, it's both impressive... and disappointing. r/woooosh

And so they just left it in? Almost like they don’t have editing 😂

Dumbledore is always kinda giving the finger to everybody with his little trolls, it's so funny. I feel like he must be so tiring to deal with on a daily basis...

@@Libellulaire someone so powerful would either be a dick or eccentric af. I'll take the latter

Dumbledore understands the concept of 'Plausible deniability'! *one sin removed*

big meme

Okay, and in the films they felt like changing the tension of that scene, and I think that's great. Kinda dumb when people want the book to be directly translated to a movie. It wouldn't even work at all anyway

@@JasonDrums24 It doesn't make any sense man. That's the literal only line Dumbledore is ever aggressive with Harry in the movies. It's so out of place and very odd.

Why is this too low?

HARRY HARRY DIDYOUPUTYOURNAMEINTHEGOBLETOFFIRE

Well that's pretty significant LOL

retsaM innavoiG would be great at CinemaSins

It's really no wonder Tom was such an asshole. I would be too.

@retsaM innavoiG it's a sin.

No she didnt even feel bad she deluded herself into thinking he actually loved her

I'm pretty sure Th3Birdman ist working on that right now

Yeah that’s already a series, there’s a guy called Th3Birdman who does everything wrong with cinemasins’ everything wrong with _____

@@hexenshadow5642 wow really? Where .. that is funny

I only watched the first 10 minutes but you could counter like 70% of the things he's saying.

@@Film-Is-Magic Well if you already read the books yeah, but cinema sins is taking it as its own universe separate from the books. Because the movies do a very, very shit job at explaining very basic and key plot points. Like the wand thing, its stated in the books that you don't need your wand, or even a wand at all, to perform spells. It just makes spells far stronger when you have a compatible wand. None of this is explained in the movies though. With that being said, you can still counter a good portion of what he says just by pure logic.

HARRY! *Did you put your name in the Goblet of Fire!? Did you!?* -aggressively shakes Harry.

I was searching for this

I was disappointed it wasn't in the video

@@alan-hz1to Well, this is Cinemasins, not BookSeriesAndCinemaSins

"HURRYDJAPUCHANEMUNNOBLETOFIRE"

I'm sure he would find the way to cram it all together

Just had to sin one movie then you‘ve sinned all of the movie‘s plots

No shit 23 movies to like 7

@@alenciaga21 lmao

@@alenciaga21 nice 👌

I loved Harry Potter and the Goblet of Hair

I’m finding this funnier then it should be

😭

I liked the part when Hermione said "It's coalin' time" and she magicked all over Henry's filthy tender with special drugs.

Couldnt you force someone to make a vow as a bypass to killing them? Like, "say the vow, say 'I won't breath for the rest of my life'" and then the person dies no matter what. Or does the vow have to be consensual?

@@thatguyintherain3168 Something like that almost happened to Ron in the books. The Weasley twins Fred and George almost put ron under the unbreakable vow, their father caught them and stop it before anything happen. He was pissed when he caught them. The unbreakable vow requires you to agree upon what is said so anything said cannot be forced it has to be consensual. But you could trick someone into an unbreakable vow like what almost happen to ron.

Why not call it the liars curse or the revenge curse. SInce the vow is clearly breakable and it being unbreakable isn't the point of it anyway. The person making the vow which was broken obviously lied to make the vow and you only want them to pay for breaking the vow.

@@TKFKU they don’t vow that they’re telling the truth, it’s a promise, a promise that you can’t break if you want to live, I think the unbreakable vow is a really good choice for a name

never trust a suicidal person with an unbreakable vow

Yeah, did the dude not notice that his eye was rolled back, looking backwards through the back of his head?

In the book series, madeye is always looking around for threats; so would it be unusual for a guy to do the thing that the guy usually does?

That's not the only mistake. This was a really lazy video.

@@amadeushorror129 1 hour 40 minutes long you want 10 hour?

THANK YOU! I just spent waaay too much time looking for someone else who noticed that it was not Snape who noticed the meeting was no longer private so no need for the sin when Snape didn't notice eavesdropping going on at a later meeting.

That's not a sin, it's called having a limited budget. You think people would watch 10 hour long Harry Potter movies? And before you go on whining about tv series, the industry for tv series wasn't as developed 20-25 years ago, the way it is now.

Nothing Rowling explained herself that wasn't in the books really counts. Especially since she clearly makes a lot of it up on the spot like one of the Lost writers and then just pretends it was planned all along.

​@@kieranhair37Maybe she's a gardener, like GRRM 👩‍🌾

If you need the book to understand the movie, it isn't a good movie.

@@brianoneil9662 Would you be willing to have a 5 hour film per book?!

I think it went to the first flue it could find in a diagonal direction

The book had a better reason for him saying it wrong. He just...says it wrong in the movie. In the book he inhaled floo powder as he was saying it. I wish we got to see it I the movie

@@rydianblack7594 ah true, I remember that now. He sort of sneezed as he spoke, and that could feasibly sound like “knockturn” Like “cough-gon alley”

I think the idea in the movie is that he says diagonally, as in Knockturn alley is diagonally to Diagon Ally

I had hopes in the german dub, because he just says it really fast and sort of mumbles it there, but then I realized they translated Knockturn with...well..Nokturn ._. The diagonally thing doesn't even work, Diagon Alley is "Winkelgasse" and diagonally in German is just diagonal. I get why we don't like our dubs most of the time lmao

Ohh yeah I totally forgot about that haha

No, that one makes your ears buzz. One of Snape's spells. It makes you unable to hear anything, it wouldn't be practical.

They didnt learn that til Book 6.

omg I watch your genshin vidsssssss

it is Half-Blood prince's spell

Incendio?

Hahah for real though. I’m always wanting as much of these videos as possible!

Yeah and now he just put them all together into one long video lol

I could only stand it through the 5:21 mark. Time to wash the shit off me.

this is my fifth time watching the whole video today😁

@@arvmoney11 h-how 😭 I wish I had your time

Cinemasins any% speedrun world record?

He obviously hates the first one and wants to get it done as fast as possible. Or he loves it (wouldn’t know)

@@PloverTechOfficial they used to make the videos a lot shorter so he talked faster to get more sins in.

I’m sure that was back before KZfaq decided short videos didn’t deserve monetization.

*Time to conquer all of India~* Or- *Most of India~*

Honestly the British conquering India is the greatest WTF moment in history. I still can't believe a few thousand British lorded over hundreds of millions of Indians at one point.

SOMEONE PLEASE LISTEN: if Harry had just stayed in his room quirrel wouldn't have been able get the stone and flame would still be alive

@@bucknasty6288 agree 100%. Nobody ever talks about this.

@@scholaroftheworldalternatehist The fact that a tiny island nation became the biggest Empire in history still confuses me

lol same

Please stop me before I finish

I regret watching 5 minutes of it

i popped this on not realizing the length and ended up taking a 2 hr shower

@@TomasM30 here's the guy with no sense of sarcasm

It's funny because the one clue that it is a tracking beacon was Xenophilius Lovegood saying it, and it was more like a scare chord and a 'speed of plot' thing when the Death Eaters were suddenly already swooping in. I may be wrong, but I think the first time that the tracking beacon thing was definitely active was during Bill and Fleur's wedding, when it was announced that "The ministry has fallen. Scrimgeour is dead. They are coming." and it was revealed that the anti-disapparation shield was down. At that time, with the ministry under Voldemort's control, something like a country-wide tracking beacon for his spoken name, and a witch or wizard to get a fix on where it came from and to relay the information to the Death Eaters, is much more plausible. Once the trio escaped, it was then revealed for sure that the name was 'cursed' when it was quietly uttered in a cafe on the London Underground (a place where it would be very hard to find them conventionally because they're in Muggle territory and in a subterranean location to boot) and some disguised Death Eaters turned up a few minutes later. Later on, Hermione theorised that the name was now actually cursed because 'bad things kept happening' and was now actively avoiding its use, and it was Harry being overconfident, I think, that caused the trio to get captured and brought to Malfoy Manor.

I forgot about that!

By that logic, Hagrid was the one who endangered Harry from the beginning when he caved and told Harry about him, mentioning him by name in the Leaky Cauldron. Hagrid's a death eater!

@@jackl.1759 it wasn't used as a tracking beacon then. Only in the Deathly Hallows, once Voldemort was in power. Only his enemies dared to use his name, especially Harry, so they put a charm on using the name. That's how the Death Eaters were able to track Harry. And while they muse about this in the movie after Harry is no longer under-age, they never revisit this or explain this. So much stuff in the movies you wouldn't know unless you read the books.

TECHNICALLY the name of Voldemort was jinxed. Not cursed. Yes I'm fun at parties, why do you ask

Another sin, they cut out the part where Harry reads an letter his mom wrote, it was such an beatiful scene in the book.

@@sleekyissleepy YES! in deathly hallows!, and in that movie especially, there is no reason that the pacing couldn't tolerate an emotional scene like that

@@nreed200 exactly-

@TaikaJamppa the letter i meant

@@TaikaJamppa Do you mean "An letter" is grammatically incorrect, instead of "AN letter is wrong"?

And spells mostly dont work on them (werewolfs)

As someone who only read half the books, I just thought "oh well, it's magic, they don't have to explain shit".

@@birdsong1126 as someone who never read the books, i never even noticed any of them

Because thats not the point of watching/reading a story you are just supposed to enjoy it

@@scaregameing9022 this is it, the comment above all else. I love this mentality

@@zpetrie88 Yes it's the perfect mentality to promote mediocrity

Which is another point that is NEVER addressed in the movies

@@ethanor it’s called context clues, look at the way all of the other students treat Fred and George in literally any scene they are in (slytherin conflict scenes don’t count)

@@daltooinewestwood6380 been a while since I saw the movies, but it's much clearer in the books

@@ethanor well I’m sorry that you literally need it spelled out for you, but don’t take it out on me

@@ethanor Well it’s more that they’re the most popular people in Griffyinfor. There’s not really much evidence to suggest that they’re the most popular people in hogwarts. One of the most well know certainly but not the most popular. Westwood says there’s context clues but in reality all the movies show us that they’re pranksters with hearts of gold

The thing about Felix Felicis is that it's almost certianly a placebo. This can be seen by the fact that just having a person think they drank it (Ron), a literal placebo, gives the person great confidence and they find they succeed in what they try. The description of the potion says that drinking too much can have disastrous results, similarly to how being overconfident leads to disastrous consequences, while a good amount of confidence usually leads to success. Further, Harry almost definitely didn't need to use it to extract the memory from Slughorn, Dumbledore knew that he could do it and trusted him to do so entirely, and the entire reason he succeeded was due to a change in attitude and approach after drinking liquid luck. He felt he knew what he was doing, ie he was confident, and that confidence put him into a situation where Slughorn was willing to give it up. If Harry had drank the potion and then just confronted Slughorn in the same way as before, it wouldn't work, but because he felt confident and in control, his roundabout method of following his gut instinct resulted in success, just like how Ron's confidence boost from thinking he drank it resulted in him following his gut instincts and thus performing well at quidditch.

@@bobbobert9379 Well, Hermione literally cheated at the practice for Ron too........

@@Some_Guy_6 That was before Harry tricked Ron into thinking he had drank it.

Lol

netflix version: Dumbledore beats up cinemasin guy with a random chair in the nearby politically correct food and drinks selling establishment :)

I totally thought we were going to get a redo because Birdman is doing the EWWCS Harry Potters right now. Bummer.

I mean, it's still kinda stealing, in a way

@@thatguyintherain3168 No it's not. If that was what happened, Harry didn't take it.

@@thatguyintherain3168 Pretty much

He couldn't have taken it, I mean how would he eat it if it was visible? There must hacmve been a clooak between his face and the lollipop. To eat it he would have to have it undercloak invisible with all his stuff

@@LilyRose8959 The sticky bandits will have something to say about that

I mean lupin in his furry form will eat them anyway so who cares, if i were harry or harmonie i will blast lupin to stay alive

There are many spells that could've been used. Petrificus Totalus to freeze him, Flipendo to push him away. Hell, even Confundus if you don't want to deal any physical damage to him.

The biggest book to movie sin is the dumbing down of Ron Weasley.

@@RobCooper-Bachatador There are good video essays on how and why that happened, if you haven't seen them, but I agree - in tandem with kind of glossing over Hermione's flaws, they also just make Ron dumb. Because I'm, well, a huge nerd, and read various fanfiction, it was interesting to watch as you could tell which fanfic authors were basing their stuff off the books and which were basing it off the movies based solely on how they treated Ron in their fanfics.

@@stevencowan37 I've seen the one where the director script writer just said he was a fan of Hermione and JK was shocked. I get that he wanted to have a stronger heroine and i didn't mind movie Ron but I found the books balanced the flaws and benefits of three (four including Neville) protagonists better.

damn im still reading the first one bruh while i was buying the first one i saw one book and it was double the size i think its the one your talking abt

@@watercat-veki yeah, the first one isn't as long as the others. You're in for a ride lol

Well I guess I have 5 hours to waste :D

How many times would the sin counter break down?

Quick question, have I missed it or have they not sinned F9 yet? I haven’t seen it

@@joshsmith8715 They haven't sinned F9 yet.

I’d recommend the Cosmomaut Variety Hour’s review of this series! He’s really good at pointing out all the dumb flaws 😂

Thats what im saying!

might just be the weasleys considering arthur is obsessed with muggles

@@ashignat813 He sends all of them to the dentist, then? Seems a bit too far. Still, how do people in the magical world not have fucked up teeth?

@@vinnicinhus44 They have magic to fix glasses and broken bones, why not teeth?

@@owaing it's very inconsistent. You would assume they solve a lot of these simple problems with magic, but there are a lot more they don't solve. Why are there people wearing glasses to begin with?

@@vinnicinhus44 STOP! You're asking questions that shouldn't be asked.

NERD smh

And the Tournament takes place after every 4 years

And considering how tournament goes, no lesson was learned

@@slavchansidorov32 hence they permanently shutdown the tournament again after this one.

@@RobCooper-Bachatador safety protocols is not the strongest Hogwarts point XD

it was an incredibly long and difficult potion to make, had to have very specific ingredients, it needed to stew for six months and excessive or continuous use has adverse effects, as well as the actual effectiveness being reduced, and to make so much you would need a lot of uncommon ingredients and a lot of time for relatively something minimal, though, as an emergency store it would make more sense, but, kids are stupid and would likely waste it, also you have a massive amount of spells at your disposal to kind of balance the need out

Same! I laughed for like 5 minutes! 1:32

"to the owlry!" my girlfriend exclaimed

holy shit youre right

Holy shit-

So does i think more than half the transformers movies

Seems fair😎👍

have you seen the home alone 2 one

Because he was the best and only Dumbledore.

I always wondered why ALL the spells and all the protective charms cold be overridden by Voldemort's Trace spell when ha finally had a little more power but was not at his peak. Does not compute

Ron kind of mentioned it after he got splinched

@@JulieFalen because they control the ministry of magic

@@JulieFalen He was in control of the ministry of magic AND he was one of the most powerful wizards that century. In fact he was one of the 3 most powerful wizards of that century with Grindelwald and Dumbledore being the other two. Considering that Voldemort was significantly younger than Dumbledore I would assume that, if they were at same age, he might have been even more powerful than Dumbledore. So... actually not a big deal that he was capable of doing that.

But that wasn't until the last book. Not saying his name began in book 1 and carried through.

I'd say it's the other way around, especially considering what happens in the last books.

Summed up all of the series i now understand almost all of it.

hi

yeah theres no way this could be explained ....smh ...read the books sucka!!

You’ve gotta remember, they have magical healing. They can heal just about ANYTHING. Learning magic, being able to do just about anything, means you have to learn to respect the danger of that gift. Moving staircases and poisons, etc., are nothing compared to the fact that you basically give an 11 year old a gun. At least they teach them how to use, and respect the danger of, it.

You forgot about the attendance list.

Minerva is the Head of Ginny's House, so she would naturally know if Ginny were missing.

I remember, it is either bed or sleeping

I still burst into tears when he says that

I'm sorry but i can't help myself: NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERD!

That line, no mater how many times I watch it, will always crush my soul and have me bawling like a newborn.

Why will save Harry indeed.

@@GettoGero lmfao

That almost sounds straight from the book :)

You need to walk/turn in front of the room 3 times and think what you need to open the room Voldemort hid ravenclaws diadem after he found where ravenclaw had hidden it in a tree which she told him the location of

Well sure but he's sinning the movie and not the book yeah? Also watch their "everything wrong with cinemasins" they say the books don't matter to them

@@439sparky1 so I know that? That doesn't mean I can say that it does make sense in the books. Shows even more how much the movies are lacking

@@AoiOkami I wonder if we will ever get a re make series of the films

If you have to go through outside material to make sense of what's happening in the movie, the movie had no legs to stand with and already failed on its own.

@@everythingisawesome2903 Right, because the Harry Potter movies were such a massive failure.

Prisoner and the Deathly Hallows movies should have won several. And yes, I love DHP1. Come at me.

@@MilicVale what!!!

Why should they?

@@Sergant744 Even if you don't like Harry Potter as a franchise, Prisoner should have been a lock for Best Cinematography and like half of them should have gotten Best Original Score.

Too good to compete

Yes this is exactly the reason. Wandless magic or rather magic casted without verbal spells is based on the idea that wands have a limited intuitive entity zhatvallows them to connect with their owner, they can feel the intention

@@rexmacquaidthe3rd That isn't it at all. It literally just takes practice. Only reason it is used way more in the movie and rarely seen in the books is cause the movie you can see what they do whereas the book it would have to be explained every time they did a spell what it was.

In the books, it's explained. Historically no one's ever tried to get the wand just through defeating them without killing the previous owner. So until the draco defeating Dumbledore thing happened, no one could've known whether it's disarming or killing that transferred ownership

Also killing is kind of his go-to response to every problem.

have you

You can't just disarm someone--you have to disarm the owner while they're wielding it. If someone else wields it, it doesn't count, since you broke the wand's allegiance to them that it didn't have anyway.

@@coderzgaming7610 that's not true actually. Draco Malfoy never had the elder wand, but the ownership transferred to him anyway. So when Harry beat him in Malfoy manor, the ownership transferred to Harry even though neither one had ever had the wand yet

I'm not 100% sure but Harry might've read that spell in half blood princes book and used it in the sixth book.

I read this as muffuletta, and now I want a sandwich 😭

>detailed >lighthearted >jokes Can't tell if sarcastic or insane.

Yeah they're kinda getting a lot wrong on purpose here... There were so many times where I yelled at the narrator for getting something wrong that was shown pretty obviously earlier in the movie.

@@BootyCrusader lwhen you say mistakes, do you also mean including the delete sceens from chamber of secrets

@@batmanbeyond5766 the entire part about portkeys is an example. This guy keeps harping on about the boot and how this boot must be the only portkey and how it leads to this random hill in the British countryside and the Cup being a portkey is weird because it’s not a boot etc etc. Or basically every time a problem is solved with magic, he goes “thats impossible & I dont understand it so its a sin” IT’S. FREAKING. MAGIC.

@@BootyCrusader Exactly, if the portkey aren't explained Jeremy goes "what well how does that work" and if they are explained he'll go "oh I'm sure this information won't be useful later in the movie *wink*" or "oh wow yes please explain more about this one object in this one scene" or some other "I hate exposition"

Yeah there are lot of things in the books are missing.

I’ve read that book 5 times I thought it came into place after Xmas lol

@@delphi_lasagna After the weeding.

@@naviscript2655 oh lmao

Lockhart wanted to add "Hogwarts's beloved DADA teacher" to his curricululm. Bumblemore needed someone, anyone, to teach DADA afTer decades of losing the current teacher every single year. Neither of those facts is explained in the movie. That's the sin: not the fact that Hogwarts hired an absolute incompetent for a teacher, but the lack of explanation. Admittedly, we the audience can presume that losing the Sabine god to the power of love put Bumblemore in a bit of a pickle... But the fact that every single DADA teacher hasn't lasted more than one year, including The Umbitch, because of a curse that De Mort placed on the position back when *he* wanted to teach DADA and Bumblemore laughed in his face and told him to get lost is never explained.

@@o0alessandro0o You seem very knowledgeable about this topic so I’ll take your word for it, CinemaSins just seemed to really despise the fact that Hogwarts would hire someone like Lockhart to teach

And we have to remember the job is cursed. Dumbledore knew Lockhart would be gone at the end of the year and something horrible would probably happen to him. Rowling said Dumbledore was friends with some of the people Lockhart obliviated.

@@Akuchan7 Would Dumbledore be that malicious? And if he was aware or suspected Lockhart, then why didn't he tell someone? Dumbledore was at least as famous as Lockhart, his word would have counted for something at least.

"Universities hire awful professors for their prestige and research all the time" you're talking out of your ass. literally. Just like the Disney screenwriters, and frankly the original author, you're parading your ignorance around as if it's a virtue.

I saw that scene very differently. The goblins were suspicious. If she had handed over her wand they could have kept it and left her defenceless. As we saw when Voldy wanted Lucius' wand, no wizard will willingly give up their wand and leave themselves at a disadvantage.

My head cannon was that he was actually just going to kill Dobby, it’s played up as a heroic act of dobby saving harry but not realizing he actually just protected his own life.

No, the actor himself came up with it because he could not remember one. Idk where you get the whole camera man thing from...

@@Some_Guy6 Yeah, from memory Jason Isaacs had read the fourth book fairly recently and that was the spell that came to mind. I have no clue where the camera guy thing came from. Like, what? If he couldn't remember ANY spell, why would he turn to the camera guy and go "Hey mate, you know a spell?". Why not ask the director, for... yaknow... direction? Still though, it is kinda silly. If anything, he should have gone for his wand and that's when Dobby reacts. But no way is Lucius Malfoy stupid enough, even in a rage over losing a valuable slave, to think that AKing Harry bloody Potter in the middle of Hogwarts is going to end well.

That’s crazy how’d you know that?!

@@Sosamoneybags Interview, if i remember correctly.

Movie Dumbledore be like

Yep that’s Dumbledore

@@zabuki1740 Not only in the movies. In the books his character was mostly the same. This dude never told exact informations. Dude loved his RIDDLEs (pun intended)

Dumbledore refused to be straight with anyone.

Dumbledore crazy man.

The issue is needing the books to understand the films. There are film only Potterheads, and the movies should be able to stand on their own.