NiceRsProductions I got "standing there with his niffler dick out"

NiceRsProductions I read this while he said it. Fucking creepy.

NiceRsProductions I wanted this to be mentioned every time 😁

Really? I got: "Fuck this suitcase and everything it represents."

Get in the bag Nebby!

and the over 70 people + hedwig in part 7

Im not crying ! You're crying !

Back when Robert Pattinson was hawt

Memento Mori 🖤🤍

I think you missed the joke

What did he do there ?

Aaaaah! I've been looking for this comment!

@@morejemmex6367 Ezra Miller (Credence) starred in a movie called The perks of being a wallflower. (great movie btw)

Screen junkies' honest trailers made one about "we need to talk about Kevin" There's a theme I tell ya

@@meetaverma8372 as a 7th grade student that movie disturbed me and my twin.

Haha, same!

Best comment I've read so far xD

just how short would the original series had been if one existed Dumbledore : hey Harry find the hocruxes Harry : Why waste time....

Shit they're onto me.

what movie at 20:07 ?

royal mermaid being dead is one of said perks indeed

royal mermaid was he referencing "the perks of being a wallflower"?

Yea he was the actor Ezra Miller who plays Credence was also in that

That took me a second to get, but now I'm crying 😂😂😂😂😂

when was that?

Emilie Wttqnd yup

Only in the movie.

That's some convenient bullshit

Actually, the movie got it wrong. She didn't use obliviate she used the forgetting spell so she could eventually undo it. The movie added the photo disappearing thing for effect, but was not in the books.

kevin k only because pictures of her were never addressed in the books

This is confusion at Shyamalan levels , not the good one , the "After Earth" one

Rowling not knowing how different writing a book and writing a film script are fucked it up. Then there's the fact that the Fantastic Beasts films are just a way to drag her one idea out longer because she can't think of anything else and knows she'll never write anything as successful ever again.

@@Xehanort10 I think if she just wrote the stories in novel form like she did with HP and then had others adapt it to film, it would be way better than what we got now

Omg, well done. Best comment haha!

Maniacal Ghoul 😳😳😳 This comment. It changed my life.

Mike Wazowski: Sheeesss out of our haaaaair!

Excellent reference.

what movie at 20:07 ?

LaserCustard WHAT!? Nooo. What gave it away?

I'm getting that feeling too but I'm not really sure

Where did you get that idea?

Yeah, there was something in the tone of his voice.

Did I miss something? What does the suitcase represent?

Ye thats what i was expecting from this movie

Yeah the dumbledore story is a different film

Maybe if you were like 70 yrs old

​@@vojtecc Or 7 - my brother and I *loved* watching Attenborough's stuff on VHS.

Omg yes! Just like these dinosaur movies, combined with Avatar (blue world). Would be so cool and interesting 🤗😄

I'll be sure not to invite you to my Grandmother's yearly Christmas party.

So it's almost poetic that Newt's grandson would marry Luna, who is as passionate about animals as Newt.

​@@thepickygamer4450username checks out.

Can I join? I play guitar.

Yeah, now we just need a drummer and pianist

I can be a singer, or a drummer.... or a pianist..... or just stand in the audience and go WOOOOOOOO

Imagine if this became legit and this was our origin story.

I'll be the pianist

Jessica Cooper ikr, even if Jeremy has some favorite movies he would still sin them like he hated them because those movies gave him and his entire family cancer. Everything is just for fun but people treated this channel like some professional movie critic non sense.

Jessica Cooper They are probably just new to the channel. When I first saw Cinema Sins I got pissy about the non sense sins like "no lap dance sin" but I quickly caught on lol

Jessica Cooper When I first got a vid by cinemasins on my recomended I thought it was some weird shit and never bothered to even try and watch it...Until,I somehow, watched my first video and got addicted to it.. It's propably just because they are new..(some people don't get this is humorous though,despite knowing what this channel is,but that's an exception)

Jessica Cooper startin to gate this man farrk why can't he keep he's feelings to him self, can he make better movie? anyone know

yes, however, the one constantly recurring sin I hate is "Guy/Girl X would be good at cinema sins" like well yea they pointed out a characters stupid idea. And this bad because??? That one gets on my nerves. Everything else is pretty fine

Yeah I was just thinking: has this guy read the books or for that matter watched the movies

Ikr It was even an important part of the plot towards the end

And he blatantly references them in the "Order of the Phoenix" video

Ravenclaw Thestral. I was just about to say the same thing. It’s like he forgets a movie right after he makes a video about it😂😂😂

@@rasmuspetervammenrsns3353 if the movies are forgetable, yes

SHINYYYYYYYYY

Nifler is still lame. What kind of seal is on that suitcase if a nifler can just get out that easily?

Kai Rider I would assume the difference is the amount of influence they have. Newt and Tina were charged with the murder of a single non-magic person.. Grindelwald is a mass murderer of magic and non-magic alike with a huge following. I would assume they'd keep him to see what kind of information they could get out of him about all the people that would potentially continue his work after his incarceration or death. The other two are considerably less useful to them..

Well, we all see what happens when you do that though. Just watch Kung Fu Panda. Shit blows.

Kai Rider Maybe because Grindelwald was the one ordering the execution? I'm not sure though.

Kai Rider Except that casting that spell required extreme amounts of hatred, and even then, only the most twisted and evil wizards can ever really use it all the time and reliably. It's sort of like shooting someone versus death by lethal injection. Sure, the injection is more costly, but given that it's cleaner, it's still the best method for execution.

I guess it's because he has to be put on trial in britain for his crimes since that was done there otherwise there is like a diplomatic accident but that's still dumb because they don't seem to care that much about the inistry of magic uk

Haha true!!

I would not be mad about that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Mind over Mindfuck he actually did

yeah he probably knew that

It was announced well before this video was put out lol

He literally has someone looking after them in the very next movie

Also, they find him annoying

@@SidPil people respect him more now. That was the movie arc.

Yeah that cuz he’s so busy super extra critiquing everything simple details like this escapes him in order to find sins to give lol

There's unfortunately a lot Jeremy gets wrong in this video. He says Legilimens weren't introduced in the franchise before this movie (Voldemort and Snape were) and that Obliviate doesn't affect photography (which it does, as shown when Hermione Obliviated her parents).

Puppy Z.A.P. He also got bit by a murtlap, which messes with memories. (And if you see the part at the end of the movie when Queenie walks into his bakery, he grabs the bite scar).

That would be true.

Puppy Z.A.P. but he doesn't remeber her, or the case or magic. so no, this excuse doesn't work.

Puppy Z.A.P. OKAY SO I'M NOT THE ONLY ONE WHO'S BEEN SAYING THIS

I thought it was because of Queenies kiss and because of the fact that she temporarily covered him with her umbrella? But then he got rained on more so that doesn't work...

I'm the same!

Blanche Me too. I enjoy seeing him pick movies apart and I've watched him do some of my favorites, like Jurassic Park and Star Wars. I actually have more fun if I've seen the movie beforehand, but I don't have to have seen it to watch the sins video. These are just for fun. People really need to lighten up.

Blanche who the hell doesnt watch them for fun

The way some of these comments read it seems like there are those that are almost personally affronted. Me? I just want a good laugh. I go to the Win channel to feel all fuzzy about my films lol

Валерия Петухова - Get a job ya fake russian

Because the erumpant was magical and Jacob was not. The erumpant already showed it had physical abilities that normal humans (and hippos / rhinos would not)

im a gøner it’s magic idiot

He was bigger

Exactly what I said!

none magic muggle :/

And all it represents.

That actually makes so much sense. I can't believe I didn't realize that

Remember though that there wasn't only people dying, I'm sure there would be a fair few people (even if just a small percentage) who saw something that wasn't necessarily bad, like a platypus kinda thing sniffling around the bank and shouldn't get the memories removed by that reasoning. I know I'm probably nitpicking but that's what we do when in the presence of cinemasins.

+Breathe-Think-Dream Yeaaaah... I guess. But that doesn't change the fact that selling little and disgusting non-existent monster shaped pastries is a horrible idea! I mean, I would never put one of those near my mouth!

That's how I interpreted the Chekhov's Gun poison as well.

@Josh H Yes. Yes it was. Did you miss the entire ending somehow? Newt sending up the thunderbird with a phial of the venom to distribute it through the rain? They only used that. So when Jacob steps into the venomous rain, he too will only lose bad memories. Which he didn't have.

The books doesn't matter 🙄

MegaSombra7 sometimes it does

@@MegaSombra7 hOW dare you! Books are ALWAYS better than movies!

The sad thing is JK wrote the screenplay for this “prequel”

@@kirke_daydreams It's a rule from CinemaSins. A decent and fair rule.

CJ Gerwig Honestly, he’s amazing!

I have to agree he is amazing, but I love all 4 of the main characters.

@@MissKitae yup. Why couldn't we just get Newt and Jacob's wacky animal adventures? Tying it up with Dumbledore and Grindelwald was so unneeded.

These movies show how great these actors are at their jobs! If these were casted differently, they probably would have died by the end of the second one!

randy K15 harry is boring

it makes them forget they even existed at all

Ashby Laws thats sad as fuck 😂😂😂

I'd like to imagine it uses the same "obliviate" magic that Hermoine used to remove herself from her parents' memories. It'd be as if those dead never existed, as Ashby Laws said.

Вероника Давыдова un

Which was actually a whole lot of bullshit on its own. Did she go change all public records and hack government databases to erase herself? Did she also change the memories of every single relative and every single person who knew her parents and thus knew they had a kid? Did she also go through and alter every single photo in the house, attic and relative/friend's albums? ... if so, then wow, that's a very time-consuming task. It's a good thing she didn't have anything better to do, like, oh help her friends take down an evil wizard. Unless she's actually the evil genius all along. I mean, her morals are clearly questionable since she's apparently willing to brainwash her own parents, but I didn't think she was quite THAT far gone... Hm. I should maybe clarify that I'm not trying to attack you here. The mechanics of the obliviate spell have just always seemed quite poorly thought-out to me. The human brain is quite a complex thing and the obliviate just seems like much too simple a spell to do everything it supposedly does.

6:28 THAT IS A MOTHER F#€|

Not to mention that Legilimency isn't MIND READING!!! According to Snape, "The mind is not a book that can be opened at leisure." A sh*t ton of Muggles think this, and those Muggles and this movie are WRONG

Gabi Garzon Jesus christ dude, im a potterhead to, but chill out

I think the implication is that snape isn't very good at legilimency, I think at some point they said that if harry couldn't keep snape out he wouldn't stand a chance. Also I wouldn't be surprised if she turns out to be the best at legilimancy, just cause that happens a lot in this series.

@Cameron Breeze: cause--a person or thing that acts, happens, or exists in such a way that some specific thing happens as a result; the producer of an effect 'cause--contraction of "because" The More You Know

Comment written a year ago, and i just now see it. Bravo fellow internet stranger 😂

the first one brings confusion. why would letting a wild creature go be illegal?

@@thedolphin602 why is that confusing if i had a leopard as a personal pet and just released it in the suburbs - that'd be a major fucking issue i'm pretty sure releasing magical beasts you may or may not have legal access to in the first place without any sort of laws or regulations or an ok from a government presumably watching for this sort of shit - would indeed be an isuee we're not talking about an animal like a housecat out in the wild or whatever (which is actually extremely damaging)

@@thedolphin602 The whole conflict of the movie is that everyone views it as something like freeing a murderer.

Sirius: I CAN be Sirius.

In real life, no not really. You are subject to the laws of the nation you are IN, not the one you came from. There might still be political wrangling involved, but that's diplomacy and only if there a greater issues would intervention actually succeed.

The Jabbawok well no..if say you get arrested in China, you go by their rules..not by American laws if you're American. ..

The Jabbawok Grindewald is russion. He also never terrorized Britain.

Firstly, Newt went through the immigration offices, baggage search, and he's IN AMERICA and Britain hates him because he was expelled from a very prestigious school. Secondly, when has Murica ever been good at these things?

International law says a country doesn't necessarily get a say if a citizen is imprisoned or prosecuted in a foreign state, but governments tend to speak out if they feel their citizens are being unfairly treated by the foreign stat. The prosecuting government is sometimes encouraged to levy less heavy handed punishments to keep up diplomatic relations. A long time ago an american tourist was tricked into smuggling drugs into singapore and the american embassy pleaded with them for weeks not to execute the guy, iic they did it anyway. A couple years ago Obama sent Clinton to north korea to negotiate the release of some journalists who had been ambiguously sentenced to hard labor for crimes against the state. international law might apply differently for wizards but the same should apply, Newt would be subject to American wizarding laws unless the British ministry objected to his right of due process, but then again we all know how the Wizarding world overall feels about due process.

RPGMaster Damn, you are so meta.

Not to mention kranklewing bumwranglers, galloping twinkletongue klapwrinkles, fastbottom plumwarts or pilcherpot hillhoppets. This game is fun!

But ... did he create something that's eventually going to evolve into a dementor?

Lucia: oooooooooooooooooooooh nice!

No, dementors exsist alrady, they were created (possibly unintentionaly) by a cruel dark wizard who used to live on Azkaban before it was a prison. If you care about that universe, you can read more: www.pottermore.com/writing-by-jk-rowling/azkaban

Lucía Kaminski that are 2 different things.

Lucía Kaminski no i don't believe that's how it works because dementor's are like the embodiment of terrible feelings and forgotten good memories I think and obscurial's are like a wizard or scribbis (idk how to spell it) depression and anxiety formed into a slowly killing parasite

Eas that explained in the movies? No it was not this is CINEMAsins not booksins. How can you fanbois not understand this really somple concept.

John Doe It's pretty damn obvious in the movies.

Also Snape

Salazar Slytherin is a legilimen if you want to close this debate.

IzzyArcadeGamer Youre incorrect. Snape details how voldemort used to show his victims horrifying images to make them go insane.

you're right, and that's a whole new can of bullshit just opened lol.

Charles Crofts No, in the real lore, she had to manually change those

Obligatory, "This is CinemaSins not NovelSins."

Charles Crofts OOOOO NICE BURN

Cubemaster THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER (the same goes for any other extra material)

it probbaly did, offscreen

offscreen means it didn't happen

No, I'm pretty sure the billywig appeared over the city at the end of the movie or something. I'd be surprised if that didn't happen…Like, I don't quite remember it, the memory is there but I just can't tell if I manufactured it from how obvious it is…Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. >.

I Mean, I've seen the theatrical version and the DVD version and I don't remember anything like that, but I can easily imagine it happening and how it happens (in a cliche way).

Maybe the Billywig showed up again as inspiration for a baked good?

Reparo

That’s a simple reparo spell, dumbledore uses it in half-blood prince i think, any adult wizard can do it

Grace Deakin Well GB simply didnt have more than a few colored people in the 1920s. They did however, rule over them with the excuse that africans, indians and basically everyone else arent intelligent enough too rule themselves.

One of the biggest reasons Britain didn't have legally enforced racial segregation was because it was impractical while running an empire. The British empire required non-white Brits to help in administration, defence etc. There's also the fact the Victorians in particular; liked to tell themselves they were civilising our colonial subjects. Making them good Christians that value freedom, exploration, science, industry etc. Again, it's hard to do that when you're legally barring them from certain things. Lastly the abolitionist movement in Britain was extremely popular and won the public over with the idea "We are all sons of Adam" to over simplify things. It's hard to free black people from bondage with that argument and then immediately pass a bunch of laws restricting their access to society.

@@walsh9080There were no anti-discrimination laws in the UK until the Race-Relations Act of 1965. Before then it was legal and common for hotels, restaurants, buses, employers etc. to discriminate against or refuse service to non-whites in the UK. There were also race riots across the country, like in 1919, with white dock workers refusing to work with black employees...employers solution was to fire all the blacks. Here is a listing of some events in regards to racism in the UK, from the British National Archives: 1919 uprisings in London, Cardiff and Liverpool 1931 Dr Harold Moody establishes the League of Coloured Peoples 1948 British Nationality Act 1948 SS Empire Windrush arrives at Tilbury 1958 uprisings in London and Nottingham 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1958-1966 Notting Hill Carnival begins (exact date is disputed) 1963 Bristol bus boycott 1965, 1968 and 1975 Race Relations Acts 1967 British Black Panther party established 1970 Trial of the Mangrove Nine 1979 Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure (led to repeal of the ‘Sus laws’) 1981 Brixton uprisings and Lord Scarman report 1999 Macpherson Report published following the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/black-british-social-and-political-history-in-the-20th-century/#2-key-events-organisations-and-legislation Eventually the government stepped in, but there was a lot of trouble, and reaction from whites against the legislation protecting Black UK citizens. Pretending that racism wasn't a thing in the UK, especially around the turn of the 20th century, is ridiculous.

Saying 'there was no legally enforced segregation' could be interpreted as there being no NEED for such laws. I didn't imply you didn't know that, but that some people might misinterpret your statements. Pernicious racism was present in the UK just like in the US...less than in the US South, but more than in US Northern cities. Some here want to pretend that the UK was a colour-blind utopia for race relations. That was not the case.

@@Ocrilat Oh right I see what you mean now mate. Although personally I wouldn't say the Northern US states were better than the UK because of things I've read like the works of Frederick Douglass for example. Yeah the people thinking Britain was some kind of egalitarian paradise are kidding themselves. To Britain there was money in not having Jim Crow laws because of the empire. It was motivated by greed more than any progressive desires.

Jack Cedeno Dude the number of edges you have is unhealthy. YOU ARE A DODECAHEDRON WITH ALL OF THOSE EDGES

deffdefying So many edges it becomes a sphere...

That was some sinful crap right there.

Yeah, that needed a "Bullshit."

l3utterl3oy I had that exact same thought!!

The second I saw a Kerbal face was your avatar, I went "THIS BITCH KNOWS WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT *points vigorously at screen and nods head spastically*"

Plus, wouldn't the cockroach just fly away? We've had flying roaches before.

I thought it was Godrick Gryffindor's hat and he did it? And later his sword was hidden inside...

@@effiethefey idk if it was Gryffindor's hat but I'm pretty sure it was Slytherin who enchanted it. I'll try and find the source to check. Gryffindor's sword was definitely hidden in the hat tho

@@F00L_Of_A_Took Oh, ok. I read the books a long time ago, so I may remember some details the wrong way😅

Yeah butt Queenie was a born legimens​ (sp?) Not like Snape who learned the art

but that was looking into his memories and not Reading his toughts

RIGHT. It's in the book OotP. HUGE plot point, in fact. Check the book if you don't believe me.

James D I was talking about the actual book. Obviously some things are going to be left out in the movie.

It's implied that Dumbledore was a Legilimence too

how does the obliviate spell affect neighbors or friends or anyone who came in contact with her? it doesnt.

Troy Walker They moved to Australia, right? So they didn’t have a chance to talk with them

@@-soph-1630 that i dont know, ive only seen the movies

@@troywalkertheprogressivean8433 one of the many reasons why you should read the books

Hermione didn’t actually use the obliviate spell. It was said that way in the movie, which confuses many people, but Hermione didn’t obliviate her parents. She used a different spell I can’t remember the name of. The spell changed their memories so they didn’t remember they had a daughter. She also made them want to move to Australia, which they did. After the Battle of Hogwarts, she fixed her parents’ memories.

aaaand they do say what a legilinens is ! Snape was one and tried to teach harry occlumency!

Despoina K Snape is an occlumens, not a legilimens

Also that "ability to reconstruct destroyed buildings" was introduced in Half Blood Prince when Dumbledore restored the house Slughorn was hiding out in

Hailey that's not being rude, it's honesty ._.

Too true! And that after saying those movies were better than this one.

More importantly than that, how did he miss the moment where Newt says that he is gay in a hilariously unnecessary way? I mean, just the way that whole conversation went was so fucked up. They even cut it from some versions of the movie.

Matthias Strøm wait, when did that happen?

yeah matthias what do you mean?

Matthias Strøm That can't be true because in the textbook (Fantastic Beast and Where to Find Them) in the autobiography area it says that Newt got married to Tina. So he is bisexual or pansexual at best

Matthias Strøm What the fuck, Matthias, tell us more!

Even Bellatrix was a death eater and Regulus Black too

You know, one of these days I really should get around to watching/reading Deathly Hollows. I gave up on the franchise after reading Half-Blood Prince.

The movie handled that scene differently than the book (which was told second-hand in the book, too). Hermione modified their memories to think they were other people who really wanted to live in Australia, where they quickly went. After Voldemort was defeated, she put it all back to normal. The photo disappearing thing was kind of dumb, and was more of a visual cue to the viewers which has apparently become an actual magical ability now.

Definitely, more for the visual audience. I would think they would keep up with the same idea atleast for the movie audience in FB about the photos

Swiftbow - I thought the visual was better than the book in that case because they implied that she'd lose her parents forever which is a much bigger sacrifice.

Yeah, that was a bad implication, though, because she didn't. I'm not saying it was a bad scene, those last two movies were quite good (and paced a bit better than the book, too), there's just a few scenes (like that one) that I get nitpicky about. The other big one was Harry snapping the Elder Wand at the end. (Though, again, I understand why they did that.)

I would also like to add that the reason he made the serum was to try and get rid of his own bad memories, which is hinted throughout the movie.

Congrats, you're the only person in this comment section at the moment who isn't talking about how early they are!

very refreshing

I'm already dying to see Fate of the Furious.

Probably doing it on either May 4th or May 25th (the 40th Anniversary of the first Star Wars movie).

Use the song Music Sounds Better With You by Stardust in the outtakes. You know because of the nickname.

i love your name

ikr?! Best Sin Ever

it's nebby. it's made of gas clouds and it belongs in a bag

Zeldonyx Skypotter, sorry, I didn't get your reply until now. Thank you

Fred and George could have said that.

but he also messed one up. he says the girl is was the first ligimens in NY for the first time in Harry Potter, but Voldemort was one and it was important to the Harry Potter plot

Nerdiology so was Snape

+Dancing Troll!! they werent ligimens, they just knew the occlumancy spell :v

Who are "the Wesleys" you refer to in your P.S.? Are these some new characters you have invented just to add content to your comment?

@@chucks_dad9138 he meant weasleys

@@impulsewraith3419 no. Try again. You have two errors in that statement.

Alexandra Lu Is there a Fantastic Beasts book? Or how do you know that? :)

@@TazorNissen There is but its the screen play but if youve ever seen a screen play it goes into deeper emotions and actions that dont get seen,which makes no damn sense but I guess they do it for the benefit of the actor and their performance not the viewer. But even if there wasnt,you couldnt figure that out? Graves had been doing that job for years there is no way he was always Grindelwald all along. How'd Newt figure it out is what I'd like know... Maybe its because he knew who Dumbledore was.

There is a book, but it’s more like a textbook that just tells about the different fantastic beasts. And, yes, there’s also the screenplay book.

I wouldn’t excuse it because after seeing all the trailers, that one shot of Grindelwald at the beginning WITH THE SAME HAIRCUT completely spoiled that twist and ruined the movie for me lol

he is a fukung idot it says that in the movey somewhere

Magical creatures are allowed in the USA but they are protected by MACUSA. You cannot bring one into the country, as you risk exposing muggles to it but there are most definitely magical creatures in the United States.

Then how come the Clintons and Obamas are here? Har har har.

Obama is magical? Sure, but not the Clintons.

Well, Bill is the mysterious Skeazle.

It was explained in the books. In the movies they referred to it as "occlumency lessons" and the only connection was the SPELL snape used to try to penetrate harry's mind - "Legilimens", but that's literally ALL they said about it.Literally. "There's a connection between your mind and voldemort's" "Voldemort is used to reading his victim's minds", NOWHERE the word legilimency came. NOWHERE. It was occlumency lessons, that wrapped up pretty fast, and that's it. Yes, the CONCEPT was there, but no one ever explained it was called that or ANYTHING about it.

Denis Farhat I’ve seen this 5 times

Dumbledore also used that spell to repair Slughorn's house in Half-Blood Prince

And the more specific, "occulus reparo" from 1 + 2.

Calgary8889 That was a vision repairing spell made by Hermione on the magic train to the boats which took Harry and Ron and Hermione to Hogwarts as well from the philosophers stone.

Calgary8889 that is for fixing glasses I guess, because of the 'occulus' in front of it

Philosopher's stone, not sorcerer's stone (i know that's the american version, but I'm sure you don't buy into the "it's a too complicated word for children" bullshit)

I’m seeing this the day Crimes of Grindelwald comes out and he said that and I just yelled “He predicted it!!”

thank you for saying that

Justin Davenport But Snape used a spell. Queenie aparently is a natural.

Justin Davenport just like Tonks could shape shift there are ways to know all sorts of spells but some people are just gifted

you are half true, queenie is a natural but Snape trained just like harry kinda trained his occulemency

Justin Davenport Dubledore was the one too

Also, Newt said the venom they're using to obliviate everyone only removes bad memories - that's why Jacob still remembers little bits

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ocyPm6ud19fKaas.html Actually, she did use obliviate (1:07)

I'm pretty sure she literally modified the pictures separately herself; she describes how she dealt with her parents in the books and mentions both obliviating them AND modifying the pictures, and the way it is written seemed to imply (from what I recall) that she did these two SEPARATE magical acts. As in, she used two different actions or spells - one to modify their memories, one to erase evidence of her from the home/pictures/etc. That said, to be fair I have seen nothing to suggest that a particularly powerful witch/wizard using an obliviate spell COULDN'T necessarily effect all elements of the obliviated person's life which include instances/occurrences of the erased element... So still going to agree with OP, ultimately, that it's possible. :)

I always thought it was because he was only in the rain for a moment before Q came with the umbrella

If it's true, then he should have recognized Newt when they bumped into each other at the end and gave him the shells for his bakery.

Wow this mans knew the reveal in Crimes of Grindelwald before they started filming. Gg

So are you telling me that literally all the people that saw the magic happening during that night were considering it "bad memories"? Not one freak except Jacob was like "FUCK YEAAAH, MAGIC IS REAAAAL!!!" ??? Bullshit! But hey, why exactly do I expect a Rowling story to be consistent in any way whatsoever, right? I mean look at HP franchise...

Fanda Korejs Except it does make sense. They’re all scared and the city just got ripped apart before their eyes. Pretty bad memories.

Yes but they used the legilimens spell. They can't just read minds casually, they have to use the spell. This woman has a completely new version of it.

Asith I thought there was a hair on my screen

@Mazombieme - Same lmao. I actually rubbed the screen with my hand to try and remove it.

Asith Wandless and non-verbal magic is not a new thing either.

@ Asith, mazombieme & Stunfisk yup me too.

Cady Potter Also Snape is a very skilled Legilimens.

Bing!

They are, but in the movies, they were just mentioned a bit, with Snape showing one or two times. Thats it for 8 movies. We knew they are there, but thats it for nearly all of the time.

It's well explained in the Vth and VIth movies

Zacharie Guillerey I know I was just using them as examples

Harry uses accio on a frog.

Flustig hahaha nice 😏

accio someone's clothes... ...while they are wearing them

where in the movies does it explain this, because the books DO NOT MATTER!!

He Accio'd Hagrid in the books.

WB is now reshooting the Flash ;) and Amber Heard got dropped from Aquaman 2, they’re really having terrible luck right now

Levi Ackerman I think it's been said that American wizards were especially good at wandless magic.

theyre adults... obviously its hard for kids learning it, but every wizard in this film that uses magic without a wand is an adult... with a job in the ministry (except newt) which weak wizards would be very unlikely to get a job in

Levi Ackerman I only noticed Graves using wandless magic? And the reason he can do it is because he is Grindelwald (it's another hint that he is not the original Graves).

Do you mean wordless magic? In the Potterverse wordless magic is difficult for students but not so much for adults. However, wandless magic is extremely difficult to learn and only the most skilled wizards manage to perfect it

Levi Ackerman, in America, wizards and witches were more cautious about kibbles (or no-majs) finding out that they could do magic, so it's easier for them to do wandless magic

THANK YOU

Like, Hermione literally would point her wand at Harry's glasses and magic him some new snazzy lenses out of the crappy old ones he had with it, at age what? 11? without any previous formal magical training, is it that surreal that fully grown adult magic users might be able to repair extensive damage done to a thing with magic? All of this in a world where we've established that basically, magic's only limits are an actual resurrection that is not done with a tether to the person's soul (which still come at the cost of madness in canon because you're fracturing your soul), generating food and water out of thin air and making true gold and goods/possessions out of thin air (which actually you can solve the gold thing by adding Flamel's Philosopher's Stone and lead to the mix); and well limits in healing damage from dark magic past a certain point and a couple of natural magical ailments or learning knowledge/abilities faster via magic (unless you discount using the Time Turner to obtain extra hours to exercise, train or study).

@@lexwolfhale1729 I would argue that repararing a pair of glasses its different than reparing an entire city or even building and even in the books/movies its pointed out Hermione is NOT an average wizard to make comparassions; she is way too advanced for her age because she has read -on the summer- all the books needed for her classes and its really interested in learning. The video didnt say it was impossible by Wizarding World rules, it say it was plot convenience and erased all consecuences of the actions which...true. (It also contradicts itself with the book it was originally from but thats another story for another day)

Guess so

@@heyyou193 Its not entire cities at a time just parts of the city by many aurors. We see magic like this in the half blood prince when the go to convince slughorn they also do this

Andy BCE Jesus fucking Christ how did he manage to foresee that?!

Because this was already known way before the video was uploaded?

Colin Farrell, Jude Law, and Johnny Depp all played the same character in The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus where they replaced Heath Ledger. It's not too surprising if you know they're all actors at the top of their field who seem to be decent people. Also I legitimately can't wait to see people making fanart of Law and Depp. I don't need to see it, but there will be fans wanting that soon if not already. Just their characters may have been lovers.

Reema Rachakondar "The kids have never done it".

Nexus Wolf Does that matter?

Dave All indeed it does. The sin stays valid.