@Brutus Tan your so dumb I cant even see the end

Tati : Warning ⚠️ It gets painful. Suggestion : Watch DemocracyNow and read The Intercept!❤️ Then find someone from Sam Seder & Michael Brooks to David Doel or Mike Figueroa, with whom you can enjoy these moments together! #Bernie2020 ✌🏾

Brutus Tan : Angry much? Ever experienced an Oil Spill? Right! Hey, I went Scuba Diving, I have lived in the Caribbean...but you, what are you ( or your Grandchildren! ) going to do??

@Brutus Tan if you can't see the point she's trying to make you're mad ignorant. The fact is corruption is pretty much legal in this country and it shouldnt be.

@@adrijan6510 spoken like a badass 5th grader that hurls insults instead of arguments.

Jason Clement Coincidence? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e92KdtWYy9avn2Q.html

Fantastic commentary

Jason Clement excellent!

Like she had any loans. She is a minority woman. Or is that the joke? This is what happens when everyone gets to go to college. Some people should just do something maybe like "bartend" or something that doesn't require any real deep thought.

@@defmc1Apparently neither does serving in Congress.

He literally just said he didnt know anything the whole time

Father P ikr 😂

Father P wdym? It seems to me that he answered most of the questions asked of him

He's a f****** crook

@@fatherp6616 He literally did not

BooBoo Bear stfu

Translation: I don't wanna waste money cleaning up something I invested money into.

@@nickroman2622 I give you $5. You accidentally cause a fire. I am held responsible. Does that make sense?

@@harrisonfreund7845 no, but if I'm paying you to do a project that should be following specific guidelines of Environmental protections, and you do a half ass job that causes it to break. Yes it should be my responsibility, because I'm paying you and you are doing a shitty job. So my responsibility is replacing you or paying to fix the mess that my money was going to.

@@harrisonfreund7845 also! They had prior knowledge and resistance from the people that lived in the area. They knew if there was a spill, it would affect them. But they didn't pull their funds and continued pushing for the pipeline. So yea, if they're not operating the pipeline, only investing in it. They should pay out for the clean up for the Americans that live there.

If they assessed the risk and still gave the loan even though a government agent told them the loan was a low risk then yes you are 100% correct. However, that would include going after the govt too. Sadly, they don’t have any money accept what they steal from us. 🙂 So we all paying. Welcome to AOC logic.

What are you nuts, we should sue the Bolt manufacturer who supplied bolts to a car company who makes cars that happen to be in completely avoidable operator caused accidents.

j C if the car has serious flaws that lead to the crash, that could have been seen and corrected by the car manufacturers in the design or manufacturing process. Then it is the car manufacturers fault and they have to be accountable.

Mashoto Shaku why are we stopping there? ‪If the Miller Brewing Company provides a bar with its alcoholic beverage and a drunken fight breaks out (they weighed this risk and that bar was certified safe) they are also responsible for the injuries and damages. 🤗

They're trying to make sure businesses and banks toe the line or else. It's not about whether or not business is conducted ethically and legally, it's about making the 'bad men fly' (GoT)

Not really. It was widely and openly known these pipelines would be environmentally dangerous and unstable and with that knowledge the bank decided it was a risk they were willing to take and financed it. And there is a difference between someone crashing a car and corporation causing mass environmental and human damage.

@@rathernot6587 Again, you’re a moron. Wells Fargo would be adopting the FINANCIAL risk of the project potentially failing due to potential legal issues or functional issues. The pipeline company themselves would be held legally responsible. It has been and will always remain that banking institutions remain of limited legal liability, otherwise the opening for unlimited levels of corruption and power through government are endless.

😂😂😂

@@akallstar5 lol this. AOC isn't an law professor. She isn't financial analyst. Her team seems to be devoid of those. Her argument here just sucks. She stands on moral issue. While it's great and all to debate on morality of US financial institutions, this will get her nowhere. In US justice system, morality gets you nowhere. If Wells Fargo purposefully and knowingly invested in a pipeline that would cause environmental damage and financial lost to areas around it, it would be liable but since it's really impossible to prove unless the executives brag about committing crime on tape, that argument is wasteful. I like AOC but she isn't it. Her debating skill is poor and she doesn't have the legal capacity to understand that she must navigate law of the land in order to accomplish her goal instead of garnering moral supports. We didn't elect her to raise awareness. We elected her do get shit done. Instead, she opted to become become celebrity.

@@kawaiidoggo Here’s why she is dangerous, and one small little point you’re missing: she’s arguing that keystone pipeline failing is evidence enough on its own to fine Wells Fargo, she’s saying there isn’t a need to investigate whether Wells Fargo knew, this would be enough! By that logic the government could essentially stick their grubby little hands into anyone’s pocket for any reason at all times!

Truly a gift from God ;)

Trump is the best thing that happened to Democrat....

Well, our President has gotten more done in two years than Obummer did in 8. He is doing exactly what he got elected to do. If you don't like it, then it sucks for you. Good luck with crazies like OAC, Bernie, Harris, and all of the other nut cases running. Someone's going to get full of themselves and split the vote by going independent. Cry me some more liberal tears, now, I'm getting low on supply!🤣

@J G Not sure where you get that happened. Only one I know of that was selling information was Hillary Clinton.

@J G So here's your chance to explain it to me. Show me proof or STFU with your derogatory replies.

Natalia Ruiz she talks 8th grade level so idiots like you can understand

@@BAP3221 you're triggered! 😂

@@BAP3221 reevaluate you're life

@@BAP3221 8th grade was the 3 hardest years of your life.

I sincerely doubt it.

Equating a car loan to a multi Billion pipeline is beyond stupid

ravemachin you ignorant fuck the point is that banks do not pay for repairs on things they give out money for nor are they responsible for it you ignorant fuck

ravemachin there for it’s the exact same thing stupid ass

@@quinton5072 It's not the same because firstly the Bank does benefit by investing in pipelines and secondly if there is a leak then we talk about a huge environmental disaster which cleaning up cost almost the same or even more than building the pipeline and who of the many investors would be willing to finance this?! But again we don't talk about a trivial car owned by someone, we are talking about an environmental disaster which effects ALL of us

If only he had answered the questions that weren’t hypothetical tho

@@Wopedomer real answers go right over her head

Imagine how stupid you must be to take the side of Wells Fargo in this. Fox News has turned your brain into mush

@@nikk2472 What you must understand is that Wells Fargo is a mortgage company.. a financing company. Obviously they would put money 1st, they finance things to get paid back. Those pipelines they financed, which they knew were unstable was just for money.. They don’t own the pipeline like he said, they are not responsible for that, the company that owns the pipeline is. For example, you finance a car and you crash it, they aren’t gonna pay you to fix it, you are gonna have to pay to fix it because you are the owning party. Obviously you have been brainwashed by your stupid cnn bullshit and are incapable of looking at it from both sides..

I think the last part was the part she was looking for. "We have an environmental committee that weighs the risk." They have employees that weigh out the "risk" of every investment. By risk, they mean, "how will this hurt Wells Fargo." The thing they don't consider is: "how will this hurt humanity." She's trying (unsuccessfully) make the point that Wells Fargo ends up funding really shitty companies, often. So, what is Wells Fargo in terms of benefit to humanity? Net positive, net negative, neutral? Could they do better if they thought about more than the bottom dollar?

@@NeoFryBoy Its a bank. By definition, bottom dollar is what they exist for.

@@NeoFryBoy There is one and only one social responsibility of business - to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud

@@markwalshopoulos That would work but many big firms, like WF, lobby to pass regulations and laws that are favorable to them or will hurt their competition much more than it'll hurt them. I'm not defending AOC ,I just think they both are terrible people

@@oakinw8361 actually, they exist to enslave actually working people.

AOC is all about PR stunts and screen time. And sucker millennials are hypnotized by her.

She’s not “making cspan trend” you fucking blithering idiot - smart people have been watching Cspan way before her little 15 minutes of fame - gfy

*_THAT'S BECAUSE STUPID PEOPLE ARE ENTERTAINING._*

Big Richard this

What power? We're laughing at her, stupid.

Yes she does🤣

@Darren D If the bank is funding something that is going towards the meth lab they should both be held accountable. If your money is going to something illegal, you should both be held accountable for even if you don’t know where and what your moneys going to.

@@d4ngerouslyours Those hypotheticals are a super disingenuous way of framing the argument. There was nothing illegal about building the pipeline. Therefore I hope your just clueless about what is happening here because, if AOC thinks the same as you then yes she doesn't know what she is talking about.

@@Bryan-vz9lz Something not being illegal does not make it unmorale or damaging. Corporations who cause damage especially intentionally should be held accountable for their actions. She is not saying that the bank being held responsible for the financing is legally possible just that it should be.

@@Bryan-vz9lz Also if the pipeline was in a violation of a treaty then yes it would be illegal.

Good for you! I’m glad to hear that. I personally am not a fan of aoc but I’m glad she’s got you staying updated! We’re in this together no matter what “side” we associate with.

You should probably stop and start listening to her and realize she is an idiot.

Which is why her stupid green new deal got 57 no and 0 yes

She’s an idiot and I’m a democratic

I would strongly encourage you to fact check AOC's claims, as many of them are totally incorrect. I'm excited to see her get more people involved in politics, and I'm a Democrat myself, but I think she uses a lot of reckless and even dangerous rhetoric. She's also very hypocritical. For example, she rants against building developers not creating affordable housing, but lives in a luxury apartment complex that doesn't have any affordable units. There are a lot of problems with AOC once you start digging.

AOC continues: "Especially given that the financing happened AFTER being aware of the leakage likelihood" Wells Fargo CEO: "We were willing to take those risks."

Is that what your deplorable nincompoopery feather head understood? Let me help you out. MR FORD WHY DID YOU KEEP SELLING CARS THAT STUDIES SHOWED TO BLOW GASCET? Because those who bought these cars are spilling oil and what not in the environment.

Very well put Mr Benjamin Smith example of an analogy that some people cannot take for face value they will try to make it difficult to comprehend there's no way it can be that easy 2 resolve for them people

BenJamminMahn lol not the same thing bud.

@@shirleyshine1285 Trump supports are the biggest idiots on this planet. Just let them be stuck in their own delusion world. No need to explain it to them because they don't believe in that. Just remember, real recognizes real and let's keep moving forward.

Alli Bya, You must be a conservative, they scare easily.

Nanny Of course cause liberals aren’t afraid Trump is a fascist ok.

Trump is not a fascist

Don’t be scared, she’s just an actress

@ Michael M define fascist

Good point

Don't forget about every time she opens her mouth! Way worse then cow farts.

Are you really sticking up for Wells Fargo?

Because living in the current world means you can't work towards a better one, right? You people are beyond stupid.

@@gonefishn5138 lol

@Randy Boone I mean I never said that she was or wasn't correct I was just surprised at the fact that C-SPAN was trending at any level

Its only when aoc is on it

Politics is a lot of fun now. So many comedians.

@Randy Boone well why don't you just leave a general comment instead of coming at me like I'm not aware of what is politically happening in the country

She,s dumb as a rock

@Jay Bruno Because she's using taxpayer dollars to increase her followers on social media. She is quite literally one of the most ineffective lawmakers in Washington. She has introduced ZERO bills that made it to the floor. Zero! We elect lawmakers to do exactly that: make laws. Congress isn't a theater for you to act like a warrior of the people and browbeat industry leaders with no goal in mind other than increasing your popularity. Especially if you can't actually MAKE LAWS! She is a a poison to our House of Representatives. Who would have thought that someone whose only experience prior to Congress was bartending would be an ineffective politician. GEE....I am just SO surprised! I hope NY14 wakes the fuck up and gets this demagogue out of the peoples house.

@Jay Bruno These comments are the best. Again, not a single bill has made it to the floor. That is a very important distinction and is exactly what I said. If you knew anything about Congress then you'd realize that what you provided is even more incriminating; I was being kind. Finally, she was selected by a PAC and completely funded by that PAC for her seat in Congress. There is a documentary about it for Christ's sake. Do some research before you make yourself look like even more of an idiot.

you got it spot on brother. Im over these meetings. Put em in court, lay a sentence, fire em... This is definetly theatrical advocacy

I was thinking that too, how strange

She quotes The Guardian in the hearing with Mark Zuckerberg; I think maybe they were one of the main parties to expose all this information...?!

What's wrong with the Guardian? (im kinda new to politics so sorry if my question seems stupid)

It's just strange that she would decide to quote a largely biased source - that she probably didn't fact check. Even if she had she probably would've decided to use it anyways

@@sarahjane7459 The Guardian isn't very biased

Thats when you come in and say well its clean natural gas not oil

She said that ?

It says MS on her name plate thing tho

@@afroprince5262 She said, "Either" lol you didn't even watch.

All these years studying politics in graduation i have asked myself a question..how the hell is she at her position..

Give some credit to my sister AOC...she fuckin tried

They do, look @ Martin Shrkeli

Hahah

The only person embarrassed here was AOC

Ashwini Kumar Pathak she’s stupid

Haha

Seriously.. LOL

another stupid one i see lol

No, but they should be funding awareness campaigns to reduce drunk driving and they should contribute in funding to alleviate the negative impact of cars on the environment

@@pavelj8301 Hi there, if you take time to google, Wells Fargo is actually involved in green energy and sustainability. Give these guys a break. Their business revolves around financing these third party contractors to MAKE MORE MONEY. Should there be accountability for these pipelines, yes...most definitely, but in a nutshell, they’re out for a profit. The depositions should involve the companies that delegate the project. This stupid ass hearing is just for press. I swear, you’re so faithful to one side of the political spectrum that you’re willing to follow whatever your “leader’s” narratives are.

@@SomeAftermath hello, thanks for that. However, you are reacting to things I've never said and the person you believe I am. I understand how your mind works in such situation, and the need pigeon-hole a person, but you've just made tons of assumptions about me, probably without even realising. Now to your point, I don't really have an opinion on Wells Fargo - and the video was not an example of a great discussion as you say. I was just trying to react to the logical fallacy the first person made. Just to note, every big business is "involved" in sustainability to some extent. It is a whole different story to decide whether they are for real or whether it's a publicity exercise

Yea

He prepared himself. Many hours were spent reviewing her antics on CSPAN until her stupidity no longed evoked a response. At that point he knew he was ready.

@@brads7504 oooh....looks like mr B (is that for buttsore,lol?) has issues,lmao

Mr B @ the butt hurt is real boys. She has lost her marbles, and so has her supporters.

This guy got exposed by her. She surgically cut him apart.

@@haroldgar12 INTO TINY PIECES

Lol

Honeybee Fields From AOC’s point of view, that’s correct.

Exactly,she has no idea how things work .You read my mind on an example.Just like if they loan me money for a car and it leaks oil or cat converter putting out bad exhaust they responsible.She cant even talk.

Honeybee Fields (hypothetically) if Bank of America was warned before financing the house that the house would potentially serve as a meth lab then absolutely, what’s not to understand here

@@aliyahrenee7668 Agreed. The form for applicants to sign for a mortgage should include a questionnaire that reads Upon receiving the mortgage, is the money going to be used for meth? -if yes, can we have some?

Why should she? She didn't kill the deal. Amazon was going to built outside of her district. It had nothing to do with her. With that said, since she supported the New Yorkers who wanted Amazon gone, shouldn't all of those New Yorkers be just as accountable or anyone in the world who supported them along side AOC? I mean AOC is just as much as an outsider as someone from LA in this incident who supported this since it was outside of her district. What do you think?

Ryan Kuhn LOL

Ryan Kuhn they were shipping in their staff & made no promises to hire NYC residents & furthermore weren’t paying enough taxes to fund NYC! Just drive the cost of living just like Washington State & not investing in the local businesses. Stop spreading contingent lies! The what if they had........excuses!!! Go to Fox, oh wait, they block all comments because their base will fly their confederate flags!

I think you’d lose money with amazon around. Like Walmart, it costs more than its worth. How can bankruptcy exist with all that “Wall Street” money around.

anyone who's done any research on amazon.com knows they don't pay any taxes anyway so it's sort of an irrelevant question.

A 5 year old would know better. Lol

"Those were risks we were willing to take" I'm crying 😂😭. It's like Banks think that if other banks are doing catastrophic things, they should too in case there is profit in it. Novel 2008 tactics. If 20 banks try to fund a crime syndicate to take over the US government for Russia, then "those are risks we are willing to take." Or are you saying that banks only bear responsibility for illegal consequences and not just for consequences in general?

letsomethingshine oh the Russia hoax again. The house just voted to let illegals vote. That is in itself foreign interference. Yet you hold to a false narrative almost 3 years in the making that has yet to be proven true. The only collusion was between the Hillary and Obama’s state department. Those are the true crimes. Everyone indicted from Trumps camp were from unrelated issues. Nice try though

I love how this guy made her look like the moron that she is. AOC, you have a bank that finances your car, and the car has a malfunction that blows it up. Do you go after the bank who financed the car, or the manufacturer who made the car? Maybe if had put it like that, and had written it in crayon, she might have understood it better.🤣🤣

If you finance a vehicle and drive it recklessly and damage property is the bank responsible?

And she's the economic major...

She did that so everyone listening would understand. She has a degree in economics so I think she understands how a bank works.

Wells Fargo does not put profits over people. But AOC did not believe him, because AOC knows how banks work

argisht avetyan kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qr2PnrtpkszGmoU.html watch this video 'the brains behind AOC' Cenk Ugyur funds her.

@@steveetienne yup, good 'ol chunky yogurt from the group that adopted a historically genocidal name. oh, she also took money from that jolly old man, george soros.

James Oscar I agree

A loser comment. Everyone pulls this low IQ comment. Low functioning observer, are you.

@@E1itetube i think your bot is on the wrong thread? to whom are you replying?

Thats what I think. She has the questions down but she stutters and stammers through the follow-up questions & ends up just asking completely irrelevant questions to follow.

Check this out yall kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z85lnNln2Kund4k.html

Yeah, she is a complete fraud. Her handlers are the brains behind her campaign. They coach her what her issues are. She's basically reading a script from the research others have done. Guarantee she didn't have anything to do with gathering that info.

I don't like her at all. But isn't every politician effectively ready a script when they question someone in the house? Don't they prepare their questions ahead of time only makes sense. Now with that said; I'm baffled at the idea of her thinking she prepared some really insightful or even useful questions. It was a rambled shit storm of weirdly phrased accusations, that only make her sound dimwitted

Kim D idiots

The really funny part is all you guys pissing your pants when you see her.

@@deerobinson557 what does this mean? All “us guys” are scared of her? What would be scary? I’m genuinely curious.

@@That..Guy.. Every time she speaks some guys get their panties in a wad. I get it, strong women intimidate some men. Then they attack her like they were back on the playground where little boys thought all girls had cooties. It's pathetic.

@@deerobinson557 it’s doesn’t have anything to do with her “strong” nature. I’m actually attracted to women like that, and the ones who are crazy, just like AOC lol. He’ll I’m attracted to AOC. She is just very confident even when she is objectively wrong. Just calling it like I see it, without regards to anything related to femininity.

@@deerobinson557 my original response though was in regards to her theatrics and dramatic way of dialogue.

4:21 he is right though. You don't get to charge a financier of a company when the company does something wrong. You charge the company who fucked up and made the oil spill. If the bank did not contractually accept that responsibility in the first place then they shouldn't/wouldn't have to pay for the spills. You can't offset those charges to someone else that just incentivizes the builders to do a shitty job because they know if the spill happens then they won't have to fix it or pay for the fix.

@@BrickTamlandOfficial If a bank finances a company which leaks oil into the environment continuously and as part of their business model, yes the bank should be held accountable. Much worse - financing a company which constructs and maintains facilities with cages for children. Yes, personally I believe they (banks) should divorce themselves from that business relationship. It shouldn't be a Democrat or Republican issue. It is a basic humanity issue. Children in cages is bad. Providing any support for that is bad. The fact that many don't seem to understand this is astonishing.

Kalisto children whom committed the crime of coming to this country illegally. Guilty by association of their ignorant parents thinking you can just cross a border and start a new life by snapping their fingers. Little did they know, there's a process called legal immigration that they failed to follow. Thus they're in prison for it. You know, the crime called illegal immigration... Right?

@@randycruz4000 I agree that immigrants should probably try to get here legally. That's not the issue here. It's the inhumane (and illegal) ways the U.S. government is going about dealing with asylum seekers that I (and many others) take issue with. Despite domestic and international legal obligations to protect migrants fleeing persecution and torture, the U.S. government regularly subjects individuals seeking asylum or other forms of protection in the United States to criminal prosecution and incarceration. Migrants who arrive at the U.S. border without proper documentation can be, and often are, subjected to fast-track deportation processes called “expedited removal” or “reinstatement of removal.” In each instance, however, the law requires that these individuals receive a preliminary screening interview with an asylum officer if they express a fear of persecution in their country of origin. Yet along the Southwest border, the government nonetheless subjects individuals fleeing persecution and torture to criminal proceedings under Operation Streamline. This practice violates international law. The United States is a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention, which precludes nations from penalizing individuals requesting protection from persecution or torture in their country of origin. The prosecution of individuals fleeing persecution or torture further harms family members with whom the individual traveled and was apprehended. Spouses are often separated, as are parents from their minor children. These families could be released on bond or placed in other alternatives to detention while their removal process continues. Instead, criminal defense lawyers increasingly have observed federal prosecutions of adult family members for entry-related offenses which result in those family members being sent to a federal prison away from their children. The children are then placed with federal authorities at shelters for unaccompanied minors or in foster homes, while parents receive little or no information about their location and condition. I'm sorry, but criminalizing migrants and/or refugees is simply not an effective deterrent.

@@weefyeet6177 You need to lay off the fox "news" and fear-mongering propaganda for a little while. It's starting to cause some obvious brain rot... A wall is simply not an effective barrier between countries in the 21st century. Especially when no one is considering closing the busiest border crossing in the world, on Highway 5 between Tijuana, Mexico and San Ysidro, California. Fifty thousand vehicles cross the border daily, along with 25,000 pedestrians. Trump speaks of sealing the border. It’s not possible to seal a 2,000-mile border when you leave a gaping hole through which fifty thousand vehicles pass daily, not to mention crossings by planes, boats, drones, tunnels, and extension ladders... Give me a fucking break! Look, if you want a wall so bad why don't you scurry on over to that GoFundMe and pay for it yourselves? You and your fellow paint-chip eating basement dwellers are only a few billion dollars away from achieving your dream. Go get 'em, tiger!

no

This lady is going to cost us the election for president.

And I love her for it, Omar and tleib are going to kill the Democrats isn,t that what you wanted a bunch of dumb feminist running things hahahahahahaha

@@Xenumiscagive they're going to restructure our democracy. I can't wait

@@elizabethsmusicandarts1590 Marxism doesn't appeal to me

How

Her reasoning would make a bank liable for every nefarious act or liability of anyone banking with them...Jeff Dahmer buys a drill with the interest from his CD, should the bank be responsible for cannibalism. A drunk buys alcohol from a restaurant financed, now they're responsible for his DUI....that is flawed readoning.

@@johncummings2604 it’s pretty common knowledge that pipelines are horrible for the environment, especially when it comes to spills, and Wells Fargo has invested in a lot of fossil fuel extraction so they know the risks very well and they do it anyways, the burden should be on them to fund a clean up because of their negligence. The pipeline wouldn’t have happened without their involvement. Banks will decide who gets a loan partially based on history. If there’s any reason to deny one they won’t give em one. Do they know dahmers a cannibal? Then prob not. Bars are not responsible for what happens to you when you leave.

Poor things dumb as a bag of hair!

​@@coltdawg7299 idiot 😂

Dumbest bitch ever

Hence why he is the CEO of Wells Fargo LMAO

good eye

You see

What does that have to do with anything?

Mr "Shitty" Loan - lol

😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

So everything she’s saying is invalid?

I agree AOC lacks basic logic. You can't make this up.

Navyforeveryoung Jean-Philippe I mean, I get what she’s trying to say, but Wells Fargo is a financier, they don’t manage these projects... if she has such an issue she needs to take up with those specific managements. Basically how this played out is like her saying to an employer of a fat unhealthy employee, “how dare you pay a wage to someone who eats fast food all day?”

Simple, Wells Fargo is dodging questions by adding more juice to the story to throw her off. Obvious.

that broad is a phsyco

Banks financed the cars that ended up in accidents and vehicles used in terror attacks that ended up killing innocent lives. So I guess by her logic the banks should be held liable for that as well.

Lender's liability do exist, banks have been charged with cleanup cost of superfund sites. AOC is stretching on what should be accounted for the but the concept isn't new.

Before I bought my house it had to be inspected right? If there was something wrong with the house the bank could reject my mortgage request due to the risk, just like the risk that was clearly evident in the pipe line but they went in for it anyway, to make a profit. I don't understand why people aren't more upset about this since they would be getting screwed either way. By allowing the financing despite the risk, the bank is basically using your stored money to finance a faulty pipeline. These are the people we trust with our money and they can't even restrain themselves at the prospect of making more money off your money which resulted in massive environmental damage. If banks are held responsible for catastrophes like this maybe they may make better judgment calls before using your money to fund these risky projects. That's he way it should be, what is best for the customer first, not the bank.

Remy N. But if they did their research and determined it was a risk worth taking along side other banks, who likely examined the risk, doesn’t seem to make sense they should be at vault. Any chance at defending her comments about Wells Fargo financing the “caging of children”?

It's simple really, before the bank would finance my mortgage I was contractually obligated to make certain repairs to the banks specifications after their initial inspection because that is within their power to do, to request that I make these repairs. It was also within Wells Fargo's power to request that this project take certain steps to avoid such a situation, in this case they did not enforce it even though they were warned that there was a risk. They accepted this risk therefore they have knowledge before the fact. As for the children in cages, that was a decision from the organization which Wells Fargo does not control, it was not defect related; the pipe was defective. The children in cages has more to do with whom Wells Fargo chooses to do business with and how that affects them press wise. It may be in their best interest not to finance projects like the ones at the border. See the difference?

Absolutely because AOC is Great

It's not her mouth doing the talking. She is an actor playing a role written by by the justice democrats they auditioned thousands of individuals to be congressmen, and they don't want those with the ability to think for themselves. They want them stupid and highly suggestable and to stay on script. It's not even a hidden secret.

She's not smart, she's a talking head that can't answer questions intelligently when her handlers aren't there to give her the answers. She's as dumb as a box of rocks when she has to think for herself. But ya all keep rooting for her and her green new deal. Now we know the ones she's been talking about who are unwilling to work!😏 working folks have to pay up to 70 percent of their wages to pay for people unwilling to work? LMAO! Thankfully most Americans see right through the laziness of the democratic party. TRUMP 2020!!!!!

@broccollin: the ones who build the business so you can be a working folk do work harder than you think to make their $10M/year business happen.

broccollin there is only about less that 1000 people in the country that make OVER $10,000,000 per year. So go ahead and tax away.

No she doesn't

Do you know the FRAUD Wells Fargo committed and got away with a slap on the wrist for?

Somebody please ask her to explain how the fiat dollar @ 2.50 % is responsible for +/- $500 billion interest on 22 trillion, with a deficit of +/- 800 billion. And inflation @ 2%. And is this sustainable. Oh, and who is J. Powell?

She doesn't understand what a tax break is, so no, she doesn't have a clue what financing is.

Sue B as a former bartender she is an expert lol

I hope she runs for president one day. There is no footage of her ever having a live debate with a Republican or opposing viewpoints. I doubt she can even think for herself tbh

She is good for Democrats too. Good for all Americans. That's why she is so popular. 😊

I was waiting for the comment and commenters who obviously know nothing about politics show up. Welcome kids.

@@RichardDLS Honestly lol. I bet most won't detect the obvious sarcasm in the comment above.

Zenthic Epic everybody that’s not a hardened republican is a “liberal” there’s nothing in between😂

Giving clips of her failing to get any point across?

RusM 87 He’s joking bro. We know she’s as smart as a box of rocks.

@@RussM87 really.... Come on she was speaking pretty plainly.... Should the large cooperations and banks that finance potentially dangerous projects, (like oil pipe lines) also have to finance clean up? Your not dumb I assume? So you didn't watch the video, and just hate her on principal?

RusM 87 isn't that what your favorite liberal media do to Trump? Always showing all the negative about him or creating one to make him bad 99.9% of the time. The 0.1% still looks like it's making him bad. Do you feel it now or are you too stupid to realize the hypocrisy?

@Will Pack- YOU were Obviously not listening. Everything she said was hypothetical , nothing concrete. Listen to it again and this time put on some headphones !!!

You right. Good looking out fam.

Thanks : )

travisteachme this needs to be pinned

Thanks for this, I almost started scrolling

Dang man!! Thank you

* She is

Don't insult 6th graders.

Glenn Riviere She isn’t a 6th grader, but she is a bartender. I’m only going to my bartender from now on to find out how this country should be run. The “justice democrats” set up a puppet casting and they liked a not-so-bright diverse woman for the job. A background of a struggling citizen seemed to make her more relatable. But do we really want are leaders to be people who cannot succeed in their own lives first? Nothing against a bartender, but if that was the best use of her skills before becoming a leader in the Democratic Party, what does that say about the Democratic Party? Sounds like Wells Fargo invested in companies that made the pipeline. A pipeline that she says is immoral and then jumps off to say Wells Fargo is now financial responsible for every climate erosion. After he calls her out she changes it to ok what about the damage done from the leaking pipe? He calls her bs on that and it changes to, ok let’s theoretically say the pipe does have a major leak, now what? Let’s assume she bans all planes for trains. Let’s say hypothetically one of those trains derails. Is she going to pay for it? Politicians are already hypocritical, but she is amazing. Complains about getting plastic bags at the grocery store and says that she just throws them out because recycling is difficult. You can bring your own bags. If you really think the world ends in 12 years, it’s time to lead by example. She wants to ground planes, but she is flying more than most to get to publicity interviews that will never question her stupidity or hypocrisy.

@@brandonlesko8195 Well, not really. AOC, like the Trump presidency, is a symptom of the broken system. Also, its obvious that climate change is a global issue and would require macro solutions. Expecting 1000s of individuals to make a dent on global CO2 emissions is just insulting your own intelligence. If we had to go to war tomorrow, you wouldn't say every individual should go get their own guns from WalMart. Thats not really an argument. Massive scale problems need massive scale solutions.

Jay Millzz agreed. China is the top emitter so I wish AOC would go tell President Xi to get behind the green new deal.

She speaks like a bartender during a debate when they are triggered

James DaSilva Right? And they say the left don't get comedy. She is the funniest person i have seen in decades

lol totally

James DaSilva idk dude some people are actually dumb enough to think she’s smart. Should I be scared or find that unbelievably hilarious?

Not god, Santa Claus. ... or was it the easter bunny. eh pick one . They are all real.

😂😂😂😂

That was good

You, like, should have added, like, 10 more 'likes', to, like, make that statement, like, seem more environmentally, like, . . . Just, like, better.

Shoot! I forgot to add 3 or 4 'umms'. My bad.

She hates airplanes. Lets hope they her enough to fall out of sky when steps in one.

Good one !

Where I am from the bartender can be held responsible for over serving if the person drives drunk. So yeah.

Bars are often found liable in. the case of drunk driving fatalities, so yes, those laws already are in effect and used often. Check the insurance policies of establishments that serve alcohol. ......Idiots

The people that voted for her are the lunatics!

@@pamdavis00 The people that voted for her understand civics, which is more than I can say for the people who spend their time trying to discredit her. Listen to what other congressmen ask the banks. Hello, is there anything we can do to help you get away with predatory lending ?

Classic! Where the hell do these dingbats come from?

David Kidd I’m still trying to figure out where the Racist are coming from

are those hypothetical makers and companies endangering people's lives? if yes, then yes.

@@davidkidd2644 she came from a contest by justice democrats partially funded by george soros.

@@mephybooks7309 does a gun manufacturer endanger people's lives simply by making and distributing their product?

and they are completely ignoring that is not their right to choose that for Everyone!.. they got no right to do so and should be destroyed for doing it

Erebus2075 I feel you but.. destroyed..?

Risk are always necessary for innovation.

Devin Dixon way kind of innovation did you hear about

A risk that obviously IS harmful to people in So many ways!!! PROFIT OVER PEOPLE environmentally, Healthcare, Prisons is NOT OK!!! Privatization of ALL our social safety nets is also a serious problem that many people are clueless about!!!

Kyle Hanson Because they insure FOR and AGAINST both possibilities, dimwit. You haven't a clue.

The banks loan you money for a car and you are in a wreck. Should the bank pay for what you did or should the insurance that the bank make you buy pay

@@elbee5191 no, they provide loans and get a return for their investment. The operator of the pipeline may be responsible and may or may not have insurance or culpability.

@@allanc3655 except there are millions of cars in the world with thousands of different kinds of insurances. There is only 1 pipeline. Those who stand behind it should be held responsible for the consequences.

Because you did build it right? Finish what she said if you are going to quote her!!!!!Dems Strong!

Wells Fargo is the ones who claimed they don't put profits over people. I guess you would like to do business with liars as well.

Joe Smerksky so is a business not allowed to make money anymore

Banking and investing are two very different things.

@@joesmerksky5919 Not that I care about Wells Fargo. But some context with what they said is key. They could be talking about customer service and satisfaction.

lolol

false equivalence.

5 oil spills. Some people are truly blissfully blind to the suffering of others. She literally mentions the Native Americans she thinks are aggrieved by the Pipeline and Hurt by the Oil Spills.

It's amazing...and to think, she has backing from a cadre of npc's that think just like her. The future is F rightening.

High five!!!!

letsomethingshine I assume you walk everywhere and light your house with candles. How are you using the internet right now? How do you think that coal or natural gas made it to the power plant? How did the power lines bring that to your house? All require oil. Don’t be a hypocrite.

Only if you borrowed the money, specifically for murder. ;-)

This is your brain, this is whats left of your brain after AOC

Lol

People voted for her. Wow.

caca comes out if her mouth

you were already pretty dumb champ if think aoc is dumb

Savage LOL

The Onion should have a segment for AOC called "Did She Actually Say This?"

I can’t believe that I expense 5 minutes of my life listening to this millennium girl. What a waste of time.

@Mike Cruz , I can see all you woke people have not learned to debate. Just because you fantasize about your sister, does not mean everyone else does. Besides, why do you assume his sister is a girl????

@@dalvynegron1938 so you don't care they fucked up the environment for financial gain? Start 4:55 we decided to take the risk. How many times have higher ups take risks and everyone else gets the shit.

Thanks man🤘🏻

lolol hahaha right blockheaded.. just read down comments for like 2 minutes lololol my god im dying

Happens all the time from both sides, hope you get worked up each time. On another note, I agree about the loaded questions.

A country run by lawyer's, how could that ever go wrong? SMH

Where is the grandstand? Quote it

At least $174,000.00 of them. It's amazing that we're paying her that amount of money for this kind of nonsense. I doubt she could run a lemonade stand.

In no way is she Grand Standing. She is doing what you and most of her counterparts from both parties don't have the balls to do. They are corrupted by an election system that demands money from and allegiance to big money corporate donors.

Damn sure would, but do you think those fools would ever take that on?

They would only do it if they can insert trump somehow.

This way is actually the funnier version. SNL wouldn't do it honestly.

You mean it wasn't?

So Wells Fargo would be allowed to fund anything right? Especially if 20 other banks were also willing to fund it?

well you aren't smart for sure, leaving a comment like that lol

You're the fucking moron. Did you miss the part where he said "it was a risk we were willing to take"? AKA profit over everything, fuck it. And I would bet anything AOC is smarter than you by a fucking mile.

@@R-L-D why r mad?

Rob lmao found aoc’s burner

@@R-L-D "I would bet anything AOC is smarter than you by a mile" and you are basing this assertion on what, your feelings and emotions? 🤣 What's up with all the little eunuchs here in the comments who are defending her intelligence?

@Young Lord sorta...I'm not as old as dirt, but it used to smell...fresher.

ciabones Coincidence? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e92KdtWYy9avn2Q.html

5 spills didn't happen?

Lol he’s a ceo playing dumb. Don’t be fooled so easily

@@anthonyd9844 you missed the point, he works for a bank that loans out money. His bank loaned money to the company building the pipeline, his bank doesn't own or operate the pipeline and probably have little or no knowledge about it. They are about money, not what the people do with the money. That would be like me borrowing money from you going and doing something very terrible with it and them arresting you and holding you accountable for my actions. She is an idiot who doesnt even know basic knowledge, not sure how she became a congresswoman but I dont think it will be a long career.

Wrong, he isn’t addressing the spills. So she says hypothetically to get an answer to the question.

all those New Yorkers who won't be expected to piss in a bottle, poor people

you want to give welfare payments to the richest, 120 billion man in the world, what's wrong with you?

Nope, cause the people that lived there didn't want it.

Nobody in NEW York wanted it, no harm done.

@Mike Salka ur coward

Barls Charkley hypothetically... lol 😂 the spills happened..

The EPA...you mean that authority that Trump positioned a fossil fuel guy in charge lol

@@fowfow7119 yep the same EPA that has let every environmental disaster happen since the 70's. The EPA was founded to stop nuclear power plants, now it makes up rules to bankrupt small businesses.

@@justinmiller5660 Sounds like I could trust it with my life

The EPA approved it after Obama left office. It was unapproved before that because the company did not complete a set of reviews required by the EPA to determine the risk to the groundwater supply beneath the pipeline... when Trump took over... he said fuck it, we don't need the review build it. It has already leaked and its only been 2 years.