Exploring the Philosophical and Scientific | Dr. Daniel Dennett | EP 438

  Рет қаралды 283,596

Jordan B Peterson

Jordan B Peterson

Күн бұрын

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson sits down with writer, philosopher, and cognitive scientist Dr. Daniel Dennett. They discuss the concepts of aboutness, intention, and the highest good as they relate to the religious and secular worlds, the establishment of trust and ethics outside of transcendent presupposition, and the loss of academic freedom at the misapprehension of postmodernism.
Dr. Daniel Dennett is an American philosopher, writer, and cognitive scientist. He has published dozens of books, such as “Consciousness Explained" (1992), “Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life” (1996), and “Breaking the Spell: Religion as Natural Phenomena” (2007).
This episode was recorded on March 9th, 2024.
Dr. Peterson's extensive catalog is available now on DailyWire+: bit.ly/3KrWbS8
- Sponsors -
Birch Gold: Text "JORDAN" to 989898 for your no-cost, no-obligation, FREE information kit.
Beam: Get 40% off for a limited time! www.ShopBeam.com/Peterson
Shopify: Get a $1/ month FREE trial with full access to Shopify's entire suite of features: shopify.com/jbp
- Links -
2024 tour details can be found here jordanbpeterson.com/events
Peterson Academy petersonacademy.com/
For Dr. Daniel Dennett:
On X danieldennett?lan...
The Problem with Counterfeit People (Article on AI, the Atlantic) www.theatlantic.com/technolog...
Consciousness Explained (Book) www.amazon.com/Consciousness-...
I’ve Been Thinking (Book) www.amazon.com/Ive-Been-Think...
Breaking the Spell: Religion as Natural Phenomena (Book) www.amazon.com/Breaking-Spell...
- Chapters -
(0:00) Tour Update: Konstantin Kisin
(0:59) Coming up
(1:31) Intro
(3:23) Defining religion, aboutness, and intention
(9:10) Is the “highest good” a religious or natural concept?
(14:35) Dr. Dennett’s pragmatic conception of the “highest good”
(17:39) Andrew Gibson, affordances and agents of transformation
(21:27) The relationship of anxiety to entropy computation
(24:43) Cognitive and emotional conflict is mirrored across theology
(28:44) Conceptualizing what’s highest as a relationship, the Cartesian Theater
(36:35) Thought as secularized prayer, Plato’s Aviary
(44:46) What allows for trust in a secular world?
(48:09) Free will is an achievement, not an endowment
(51:09) The conception of God in the biblical corpus, a dialogue among equals
(59:14) Do these working presumptions exist outside the purview of science?
(1:02:22) When you make a tool you also make a weapon
(1:05:46) Where Gould went wrong, foundational principles, and dynamism
(1:08:44) The hierarchy of DNA repair, Osiris and Seth
(1:14:15) The secularization of ethics, how to validate moral claims without religion
(1:21:36) “It was a wonderful taming force,” religion as a nurse crop for science
(1:24:41) The evolution of human fears into governing religions
(1:27:57) The loss of academic freedom at the misapprehension of postmodernism
(1:36:28) Dr. Dennett’s latest work: “The Problem of Counterfeit People”
// LINKS //
All links: linktr.ee/drjordanbpeterson
Website: jordanbpeterson.com
Tour Locations: jordanbpeterson.com/events
X: / jordanbpeterson
Instagram: / jordan.b.peterson
Facebook: / drjordanpeterson
Telegram: t.me/DrJordanPeterson
Newsletter: mailchi.mp/jordanbpeterson.co...
// COURSES //
Discovering Personality: jordanbpeterson.com/personality
Self Authoring Suite: selfauthoring.com
Understand Myself (personality test): understandmyself.com
// BOOKS //
Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life: jordanbpeterson.com/Beyond-Order
12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: jordanbpeterson.com/12-rules-...
Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: jordanbpeterson.com/maps-of-m...
#JordanPeterson #JordanBPeterson #DrJordanPeterson #DrJordanBPeterson #DailyWirePlus

Пікірлер: 2 000
@martialartsnerd3253
@martialartsnerd3253 3 ай бұрын
This was Daniel’s final public appearance. Thank you for uploading this, Jordan.
@awakeosho
@awakeosho 3 ай бұрын
This video was uploaded a day earlier than the one uploaded at the Channel Big Think. So probably this is not the last, the other one is. There might also be other ones that we haven't yet seen.
@lucyweir5923
@lucyweir5923 3 ай бұрын
@@awakeosho thank God the last conversation he had in public wasn't with Jordan. And I'm an atheist.
@coahuiltejano
@coahuiltejano 3 ай бұрын
@@awakeosho Wrong. That was not a podcast, but more like a commercial or short documentary. This is OFFICIALLY the Final Public Appearance of Dennett...and I heard alot of agreement and commonality between these two men....
@coahuiltejano
@coahuiltejano 3 ай бұрын
@@lucyweir5923 Wrong. That was not a podcast, but more like a commercial or short documentary. This is OFFICIALLY the Final Public Appearance of Dennett...and I heard alot of agreement and commonality between these two men....
@martialartsnerd3253
@martialartsnerd3253 3 ай бұрын
@@awakeosho thank you!
@tylerraabe7329
@tylerraabe7329 3 ай бұрын
The value of watching two men with fundamentally different points of view of life having a conversation cannot be overstated. We get to watch it for free.
@b-m605
@b-m605 3 ай бұрын
excellent point. Good to see some one modelling this.
@marleyjanim5033
@marleyjanim5033 3 ай бұрын
Time is not a fee, it’s a trade off
@xxnetravenxx6965
@xxnetravenxx6965 3 ай бұрын
Peterson is very good at taking in clearly opposing (to the point of contempt) ideas and sitting with them and then responding in a way that tries to find a common understanding.
@BenBass00
@BenBass00 3 ай бұрын
​@@shmosel_ you know they mean free of 'fee for service'
@Michael-hb3ip
@Michael-hb3ip 3 ай бұрын
Yes it is..... Ridiculous to think otherwise. ​@@shmosel_
@axe-z8316
@axe-z8316 3 ай бұрын
Mr Dennett, what a legend, you will be missed.
@TwoKnowingRavens
@TwoKnowingRavens 2 ай бұрын
I learned a great deal Daniel Dennet. He very ironically led me to faith through a process almost too complicated to describe here. If he were still alive to hear my explanation I would say that he didn't fail in any way, but he did expose me to even deeper questions. Skepticism is an extremely useful tool, but one shouldn't stop using it when they find an answer they like. I was searching for true justification for my atheism and what I ended up finding was God. Not by avoiding information, but by turning over absolutely every stone possible. I hope that it honors Dr. Dennet's memory and those who survive him that he challenged me to challenge myself and he gave me a great deal of tools that helped me to help myself and others. I honor his memory. But I would not mock him by praying for him. I suspect he has had all of the conversations he has needed to with God and himself even if he remained honestly unaware. Thank you Dr. Dennet and rest in peace.
@bboynewsboy991
@bboynewsboy991 2 ай бұрын
That's been my journey as well these last few years. It's been a relentless journey of confirming logical theories and conclusions, whether they were true or not, that is, whether they brought me a step closer to intellectually reaching God. I've come to the conclusion this week actually, with the help of Dennett, that Athiesm can be put simply as a deep-rooted motivation to deny what is plain to see. Meaning, morality, consciousness etc have to be denied existence in order to be an athiest.
@breadfan7433
@breadfan7433 2 ай бұрын
@@bboynewsboy991 Ah, yes, the well-known adjective "athy, athier, athiest"... Ffs, it's "atheism" and "atheist". It's bad enough that you're projecting your denial to atheists, at least learn how to spell the damn word.
@jacobfrancis8310
@jacobfrancis8310 Ай бұрын
Genuinely curious, is this some more abstract God or specifically the Christian God-and if the latter, is there something particular which led you to faith in the God of that religion as opposed to another?
@LordDTwigo
@LordDTwigo Ай бұрын
​@bboynewsboy991 what drugs did you take to come to that conclusion XD Surprised logic is even in your vocabulary
@LordDTwigo
@LordDTwigo Ай бұрын
​@jacobfrancis8310 where they were born. Literally that's it. If they were born in another part of the world they would believe in their God. Same if they were born in eygpt 3000 years ago, they would believe in Horus. Their faith is blind just like their book tells them too be.
@Richie_Godsil
@Richie_Godsil 3 ай бұрын
I just read that Dr. Dennett passed away. This conversation is an excellent final interview and conversation I'm very sad to learn of his passing. RIP
@danielm5161
@danielm5161 Ай бұрын
Yeah I just found out too
@autumnleaves2766
@autumnleaves2766 3 ай бұрын
Always look forward to Mondays and Thursdays, when Dr Peterson's latest interviews come on here for a wider audience to enjoy. Who needs a television when you can find podcasts of this quality ? Thanks to Dr Peterson and his guest.
@brianstewart2138
@brianstewart2138 3 ай бұрын
Honestly, it's high-quality debate that people pay thousands for at ive-leage schools for.
@juliaogara8794
@juliaogara8794 3 ай бұрын
Definitely 😍😀
@MikeFuller-ok6ok
@MikeFuller-ok6ok 3 ай бұрын
I have a brain about the size of a pea, and Jordan Peterson and Daniel Dennett have brains the size of Jupiter!
@afringedgentian5426
@afringedgentian5426 3 ай бұрын
I don’t even watch television these days- I just watch podcasts like Dr. Peterson’s and learn something!
@jim-se5xc
@jim-se5xc 3 ай бұрын
“The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.” ― Arthur Schopenhauer
@ClearlyCero
@ClearlyCero 3 ай бұрын
I deeply appreciate Dr. Dennett for coming on. Thank you both!
@MumblesMumbled
@MumblesMumbled 3 ай бұрын
Rest easy, Dr. Dennett. A most brilliant thinker of our time.
@christemple8523
@christemple8523 3 ай бұрын
The moment when Jordan used the term "revelation" (at roughly 53 minutes into the video) he instantly, and maybe even subconsciously, had to clarify and rephrase because he could see that using that word had created a riff between he and Dr. Dennett. You could see it in Dr. Dennett's face. It was an on-the-spot demonstration of exactly the hypothetical he was talking about, how to reconcile a relationship that was falling into distrust. That was amazing. Did anybody else see that?
@ricardokowalski1579
@ricardokowalski1579 3 ай бұрын
Good catch. Dr Jordan realized that "revelation" was too loaded a word.
@anthonyhardisky1471
@anthonyhardisky1471 3 ай бұрын
Hell ya. That is called a fractal. When the part is like the whole. I love when I notice it happening.. although I know it's happening in many ways at all times.
@spoonerreligionandpolitics
@spoonerreligionandpolitics 3 ай бұрын
You mean "rift" as a riff would be a musical fragment they could both play off of.
@mitchellclark3070
@mitchellclark3070 3 ай бұрын
@@spoonerreligionandpolitics and yet you still understood what they meant
@justinrhea9432
@justinrhea9432 3 ай бұрын
Now that you mentioned it, yes. Thank you for highlighting that!
@Evolushaun
@Evolushaun 3 ай бұрын
Thank you for everything Dr. Daniel Dennett. You are one of my intellectual heroes.
@matthewparlato5626
@matthewparlato5626 3 ай бұрын
R.i.p. but yeeesh I don't see the world as he did since years and years ago
@gfxpimp
@gfxpimp 2 ай бұрын
⁠@@matthewparlato5626 You used to be a compatibilist? What did you move on to?
@matthewparlato5626
@matthewparlato5626 2 ай бұрын
@gfxpimp indeed I did. I no longer articulate a Compatiblist view.. but I also no longer even entertain "the free will debate" I find the synthesizing of these 3 arguments liberating... 1) degrees of freedom 2) complex dynamical systems affordances via an agent arena continuous relating & 3) (the phenomenological experience as) Agent coupled to the continual evolving Arena as goes co-identification That distillation freed me from the silly debate... as well as Jon Pageaus jiu-jitsu move of, "if it's beyond and irrelevant to the human experience, I need not waste my Dasein on it" Officially, I landed at Christian Neoplatonism (a pinch of perrenialism, see Dugin, heavily influenced by Zen, see my hero Dr. John Vervaeke) The simultaneously Emanating One thru the Cosmic fulcrum/nexus of Man into the World's Collective of Symbolic Structures Emerging and interpenetating recursively and eternally... (We don't understand much) (Keep your periphery blurry... The Saced Mysteries) 🙏 God Bless you
@matthewparlato5626
@matthewparlato5626 2 ай бұрын
@@gfxpimp thx for the question
@Andrejdrapal
@Andrejdrapal 3 ай бұрын
Dan Dennett, who provoked me to rethink philosophy and evolution and forced me to challenge his ideas, passed away yesterday. There are not many philosophers that provoke you constantly despite not agreeing with them constantly. I'm so sorry I could not meet him three years ago talking with Dawkins (whom I disagree with even more, but started with memes) and Susan Blackmore, my mother in memetics. The discussion at Tufts was canceled due to Corona. What I can do besides mourning and wishing him all the best in the realm he did not believe in is to praise his latest discussion with Jordan Peterson. It is such an intellectual pleasure to listen to two great thinkers of our age who could not disagree more.
@barbaracholak5204
@barbaracholak5204 3 ай бұрын
Two distinguish gentleman having a civil conversation ... What a treat!!!
@IIIIIIPETEIIIIII
@IIIIIIPETEIIIIII 3 ай бұрын
Distinguished!
@hurrrdurr
@hurrrdurr 3 ай бұрын
@@denroy3 cry more
@hurrrdurr
@hurrrdurr 3 ай бұрын
@@denroy3 keep crying
@Charles-ij1ow
@Charles-ij1ow 3 ай бұрын
@@hurrrdurr Troll with nothing of substance
@alexanderfailoni1716
@alexanderfailoni1716 3 ай бұрын
Dr. Dennett was the most balanced of the horsemen, even if it didn't garner him as much fame for it. Firm but fair and not belittling.
@dirtymikentheboys5817
@dirtymikentheboys5817 3 ай бұрын
Don't give him any supernatural embodiment, he's a weak materialist shouting out drivel.
@johnzhou4877
@johnzhou4877 3 ай бұрын
Nah he's a stupid compatiblist.
@anthonyhardisky1471
@anthonyhardisky1471 3 ай бұрын
​@@dirtymikentheboys5817you sound like what you're complaining about
@ericcouch
@ericcouch 3 ай бұрын
Bullshit. Go watch his debate with Desouza. He wants to teach your children the John From religion as a mockery to Christianity. He's not reasonable at all. Also, he utterly lost that debate.
@robyourtime
@robyourtime 3 ай бұрын
He’s as bad as the others. Very lost
@lovelightfreedomtruth
@lovelightfreedomtruth 3 ай бұрын
Thank you both. Thank you Jordan Peterson for helping society deeply even when its so difficult I think and helping society which is so badly needed with corrupt governments and corrupt institutions in the world.Thank you for all your work and thank you to your family and all who stand with you. God bless 💗
@ConspiracyAnalyst
@ConspiracyAnalyst 3 ай бұрын
Rest in peace, Dr. Daniel Dennett.
@pauliewalsh6875
@pauliewalsh6875 3 ай бұрын
I've been privalaged to have been a subscriber to Petersons channel when it numbered in the thousands. Everytime I get a notification to watch a new video, I smile as I watch his followers grow monthly by the thousands. At almost 8 million subscribers and billions of views, it is nothing short of glorious that his philosophy is reaching a mass that so badly craves the guidance of such a warm father figure. Long may his audience grow and may his important message resound long after essence of this wonderful soul is called home🙏🏼
@baalstone675
@baalstone675 3 ай бұрын
I was there with you brother
@JakeTiesler
@JakeTiesler 3 ай бұрын
Same, been a subscriber since the beginning - got a signed book from his patreon back in 2016, great arc
@frankiemiller5364
@frankiemiller5364 3 ай бұрын
Absolutely love and appreciate you having Daniel Dennett on the show. An all time favorite 😊
@Cinderella227
@Cinderella227 3 ай бұрын
My brother Pitin (childhood nickname) and I have been having deep religious and philosophical conversations along with a lot of childhood reminiscing. My brother is dying. The doctor gave him less than 30 days to live. Unless God has other plans that’s the prognosis. My brother is taking 750 mg hemorrhage meds, 250mg in the am and 250 in the pm. He had surgery last year and now there is nothing more the doctors can do for him. We are celebrating his life and I’m spending a lot of time with him before he enters hospice. Life is such a precious gift. My brother has lived a very adventurous life. He’s a phenomenal artist, sings like many angels, was a martial arts expert, and an ordained minister. Anyway, we are very close and it’s difficult losing my brother. He is ready to meet Almighty God. Thank you Jordan ✝️🙏🏻❤️😔
@mills8102
@mills8102 3 ай бұрын
I will pray for him and for his soul.
@Kaidawg-kj-lucas
@Kaidawg-kj-lucas 3 ай бұрын
Much love brother! It's not an easy journey.
@Lollipop_Lexi
@Lollipop_Lexi 3 ай бұрын
How lovely and deeply moving that you get to spend this time with your brother. Much love to you both and hoping that having this special time together eases your suffering as much as possible.
@afringedgentian5426
@afringedgentian5426 3 ай бұрын
May the love of Christ and the sure and certain hope of the Resurrection keep your minds and hearts as you say “Goodnight, until the day break, and the shadows flee away.”
@BottlegardenUK
@BottlegardenUK 3 ай бұрын
@Cinderella227 soak up these days, moments with your loved one. Thank you for sharing your life and reminding us all again of our impermanence and how precious life is. My prayers are with you all.
@SbonisoMMDlamini
@SbonisoMMDlamini 3 ай бұрын
I don't know for the life of me where I would possibly get another KZfaq channel with such quality conversations between people from different of such different perspectives. I am truly taking notes JP. I found Daniel Dennett to be truly insightful as always and it's a gift to be able to see it.
@yurypal
@yurypal 3 ай бұрын
This was an intense conversation. I am impressed with JBP’s courage to face counter arguments to his long-standing beliefs. Thanks for doing this!
@the300XM8
@the300XM8 3 ай бұрын
My thoughts exactly
@robertisaac1286
@robertisaac1286 3 ай бұрын
RIP Daniel Dannett.
@mobinmobaseri
@mobinmobaseri 3 ай бұрын
You cannot put a value on these enlightening talks. Thank you Jordan!
@TheGringoSalado
@TheGringoSalado 3 ай бұрын
@@denroy3understanding other perspectives (not to adopt) is essential to Loving them.
@czerwo5805
@czerwo5805 3 ай бұрын
@@denroy3 did we listen to the same conversation?
@Charles-ij1ow
@Charles-ij1ow 3 ай бұрын
@@denroy3 Looks like Jordan's religious train of the last 5 years has come to an abrupt stop with 2 words, Secular ethics.
@nicolasbascunan4013
@nicolasbascunan4013 3 ай бұрын
@@Charles-ij1ow Secular ethics = wokism
@Charles-ij1ow
@Charles-ij1ow 3 ай бұрын
@@nicolasbascunan4013 Yes, that did sprout up because of post modernism but we've recognized it, it's hit it's peak, and we've been steering it back. We're not done learning, while the religious texts allow for no change. Secular ethics still allows us to cherry pick the best morals from religious texts while dispensing with the bad, like all gays are going to hell.
@allenandrews2380
@allenandrews2380 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for grappling with and acknowledging the sophistication of our ancestors and some of their insights and arguments. I pray we stay humble through all of our " progress" ❤
@andrewvandyk
@andrewvandyk 3 ай бұрын
Amen :) ❤
@chandlerangol6718
@chandlerangol6718 3 ай бұрын
Dr. Dennet’s point of view becomes abundantly sympathetic when you realize that he was on his death bed. In this conversation he was not only having an exchange of ideas, but also coping with the reality of his death. What this man needed was not god, but medicine and a cure. His view is one that most of us will come to when meeting death.
@shillout
@shillout 3 ай бұрын
I can not hear him talk about these topics enough in my lifetime! 🙏🙏
@balancedboy5085
@balancedboy5085 3 ай бұрын
Hey Dr Peterson. I hold you a man of great Honor, it is a honor for a man like me to be alive on this age witnessing your work and kind heart. YHWH bless you.
@temmaxtemma9570
@temmaxtemma9570 3 ай бұрын
RIP Dr. Denett. You made a great positive impact on my life. The world is much more beatiful than superstitions.
@Dismal-future
@Dismal-future 2 ай бұрын
Such a shame that this conversation will not be picked back up. Rest in Power Dr Dennett
@merlinheitkemper8150
@merlinheitkemper8150 3 ай бұрын
It's so cool that they agree on so much, even though one is "religious" and one is "atheistic". Really highlights Jordan Peterson's definition of being religious as something that you 'act out' instead of something you represent abstractly and linguistically.
@dnbjedi
@dnbjedi 3 ай бұрын
‘You should act as though you believe in God’ he once said. (‘to secularists, like Harris)?
@siggyincr7447
@siggyincr7447 3 ай бұрын
Yeah, I'm not convinced most religious people would consider Peterson religious if he were honest and clear about his beliefs. His conception of God is of an idea that has been distilled and improved upon over millennia of human thought. He'll never say it out loud, but he's an atheist that thinks that religion is indispensable for human civilization. So much so that he obsesses over ways to make the mythical literature of the bible make sense enough so he can say he believes and say others should as well.
@williamadams4855
@williamadams4855 3 ай бұрын
​@@siggyincr7447 It's beautiful
@mattinhat1113
@mattinhat1113 3 ай бұрын
​@@siggyincr7447yes. That is from the bookThe Brothers Karamazov part: The Grand Inquisitor. Also In the gospel of Thomas. So far I think that is what Jordan concludes in, but doesn't want to admit it.
@jimj9040
@jimj9040 3 ай бұрын
@@siggyincr7447I think it’s just the opposite. He believes in God but knows it’s an indefensible position. He finds ways to defend it with fence-straddling prattle.
@legalgig3480
@legalgig3480 3 ай бұрын
My man, I love you. I love the light you shed on this world. Much needed
@rawgasmiclove
@rawgasmiclove 3 ай бұрын
THOROUGHLY enjoyed this conversation. Thankyou 🙏🏼💫💞
@YashArya01
@YashArya01 3 ай бұрын
What an excellent conversation. Thank you for making it accessible for all of us!
@deliverychain6050
@deliverychain6050 3 ай бұрын
I’ve been a fan of Jordan Peterson a long time. I’ve listened to hundreds of hours of his lectures and podcasts. One issue I have, as much as I enjoy hearing Jordan speak, he struggles with shutting his mouth many times with his guests. He always needs to interject long diatribes. I’d be interested in knowing the percentage of time he is talking versus active listening.
@bawsypvp5481
@bawsypvp5481 28 күн бұрын
i agree
@gamechannelminecraft6583
@gamechannelminecraft6583 3 ай бұрын
Hello everyone, good viewing🐼
@szilardoberritter4135
@szilardoberritter4135 3 ай бұрын
We must be grateful that we live in a world where we can listen to minds like this! Brings me to smile when I think of this while watching such conversations!
@szilardoberritter4135
@szilardoberritter4135 3 ай бұрын
the timing of this comments makes me sad
@Breathoffreshair88
@Breathoffreshair88 3 ай бұрын
Thankyou for this. Always eye opening and Motivating learning for me with your conversations
@franklyanogre00000
@franklyanogre00000 3 ай бұрын
I'm looking forward to this conversation.Thank you so much for putting it together. 2:44
@ihussain1011
@ihussain1011 3 ай бұрын
A conversation with Hitchens would have been on a different level. However with Dennett, I didn't think this was going to take place, kudos to making this happen. Blessed for this high level intellectual talks.
@gerryiannuzzi5122
@gerryiannuzzi5122 3 ай бұрын
Jordan, these discussions are a much better format. I was in NYC Radio City for your talk. Little disappointing I give it a C+ and that’s because I like you.
@carolspencer6915
@carolspencer6915 3 ай бұрын
Good evening Jordan and Daniel Exactly all of this. Truly grateful. 💜
@daanmollema6366
@daanmollema6366 3 ай бұрын
Rest in peace, Dan. Thank you for everything.
@EtherealSpoon
@EtherealSpoon 3 ай бұрын
Keep it up Dr. Jordan!
@ryugo7713
@ryugo7713 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for this enlightening conversation! It's fascinating to see how different individuals approach tasks and planning. Some seem to excel at critical thinking, mapping out multiple accomplishments before even starting, while others dive into one task at a time, driven by the need to avoid overwhelming options. It's a reminder that curiosity knows no bounds. Good show!
@amandajephson9964
@amandajephson9964 3 ай бұрын
Absolutely loved this conversation, thank you so very much!
@siggyincr7447
@siggyincr7447 3 ай бұрын
Sad to hear that this was Dennett's final public appearance. Watching this I figured he was recovering from some illness. Glad he was still sharp-minded till the end.
@paulomorais6319
@paulomorais6319 3 ай бұрын
RIP Daniel Dennett (1942-2024)
@lxvleygxcha1004
@lxvleygxcha1004 3 ай бұрын
This was an awesome conversation, in my opinion.. I can't wait to watch these two masters continue.
@marcbruillon7104
@marcbruillon7104 3 ай бұрын
You will be dearly missed Dr. Dennett. Thank you for your brilliant mind.
@Gibbynotaguitar
@Gibbynotaguitar 3 ай бұрын
Dr. Peterson, you gave this conversation so much appropriateness. Dr. Dennett is a foundation stone of societal norms for the Four Horsemen. You treaded this territory cautiously and respectfully. As a former consumer of the Horsemen's every word, and someone who switched beliefs, I wanted full respect afforded to Dr. Dennett. Just like when Dr. Peterson speaks to Dr. Dawkins.
@Communist-Doge
@Communist-Doge 3 ай бұрын
It's so sad that Dennett passed away. I loved this conversation and I'm glad they managed to have it.
@Raydensheraj
@Raydensheraj 3 ай бұрын
Rest in peace you legendary Man. RIP Daniel Dannett 😢
@trolley2327
@trolley2327 2 ай бұрын
It's hard to watch this now .. RIP Dennett .... what a great philosopher and thanks Jordan Peterson for this fantastic interview ... I always liked to see this side of Dennett more and no one like Jordan Peterson could bring it out.
@stratosstathakis3809
@stratosstathakis3809 3 ай бұрын
Awesome! I've been waiting for a Peterson - Dennett conversation for years now. Thank you
@joserangel6801
@joserangel6801 3 ай бұрын
Jordan has evolved from arguing with people to maintaining an open conversation. Masterful communication skills. I’m taking notes
@fra-kolpanzer
@fra-kolpanzer 3 ай бұрын
I don't think such a thing has occurred. You can watch him argue vehemently with Destiny in a podcast from the recent weeks. Not that it subtracts from his sophistication. You can also watch interviews from the last 10 years where he speaks very calmly - most of them really. Including when he talks to his protesters. I don't think he gets carried away often, maybe almost never (apart from Twitter perhaps).
@alibabaschultz352
@alibabaschultz352 3 ай бұрын
Quite the opposite. His devolution is astounding. Remember that Cathy Newman interview? That was when Peterson was great. He was sharp, calm, polite, empathetic, and firm. If you watch his interview with Destiny, he basically became Cathy Newman. He was angry, argumentative, arrogant, condescending, and pretty damn illogical.
@fra-kolpanzer
@fra-kolpanzer 3 ай бұрын
@@alibabaschultz352 I think this assessment is also completely wrong. Firstly, you seem to base your views on two interviews 7 years apart as if they were representative of a steady trend in Peterson's interactions. But there were thousands of interviews, debates and lectures in between. If you had seen them, you'd notice that Peterson is quite often aggressive in the dispute, and it's been like this since he became popular really. You could see that in his interview with Helen Lewis, which was very close in time to Cathy Newman's interview. In other interviews he's very calm and controlled, and that still remains the case. Not so rarely, you can see his soft an emotional side. To be fair, I don't remember him shouting at someone as he did at Destiny. But the comparison of him to Newman doesn't hold at all - he wasn't looking to trap and manipulate Destiny in the least. My understanding is that the topics they talked about were very grave. Like potential hundreds of millions of deaths in Africa resulting from raising energy prices and abolishing fossil fuels. If you believe that this is what is happening, and you're talking to a person who doesn't, and you think they are doing something inexcusably stupid for not noticing and condoning that, and you think these reasons are not valid - maybe you would match your emotional tone to the importance of the matter in question. What do you think about this?
@alibabaschultz352
@alibabaschultz352 3 ай бұрын
@@fra-kolpanzer I think that its easy to become emotionally attached to public figures like Peterson, who is smart, and definitely seems to care deeply about people.
@jennyzarate7086
@jennyzarate7086 2 ай бұрын
He has always been great at conversations AND debating. Jallalla Dr. Peterson.
@fletchdeeptv1958
@fletchdeeptv1958 3 ай бұрын
It was a brilliant move by Jordan to question the failure of secular universities after Dennett got through claiming "we don't need religion any more our secular ways are good enough now and moral, etc..." who then had to also agree the universities have "gone off the rails".
@Charles-ij1ow
@Charles-ij1ow 3 ай бұрын
But then DD used a combo breaker saying the religious institutions have not shown to be any better. He did agree secular universities are not in a good spot and that correcting it's path is not an easy solution but, is still is a better system.
@steveymoon
@steveymoon 3 ай бұрын
How on earth was that a brilliant move? Whether or not religious universities out-perform secular universities is completely unrelated to whether religious claims are true. A religious university could be the best in the world but that still doesn't mean god is real. It's a nonsense argument.
@nicolasbascunan4013
@nicolasbascunan4013 3 ай бұрын
@@Charles-ij1ow Ancient egyptian, greek and christian "academias" were religious. Modern universities are lame in comparison to their wisdom. Secular ethics = Wokeism (it's indistinguible in Dennet's own terms: all grounded in "science and politics" - relativism -).
@jimluebke3869
@jimluebke3869 3 ай бұрын
@@Charles-ij1ow Religious institutions have been under sustained attack for the last century, by atheistic regimes hostile to not only Christianity but to America as well. The game changed a bit when Moscow fell silent in 1989, but Beijing has picked up the slack very handily.
@Charles-ij1ow
@Charles-ij1ow 3 ай бұрын
@@jimluebke3869 When is Notre Dame going to win a national championship again?
@m3po22
@m3po22 3 ай бұрын
I love that after 7 years I can still hear stuff from Jordan that blows my mind. 40:45
@vivliomagos
@vivliomagos 3 ай бұрын
This was the greatest covnersation I've seen on your podcast thus far Jordan .. absolutely magnificent
@catholicnewsworld
@catholicnewsworld 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for this conversation - Prayers for your family - Blessed Solemnity of the Annunciation - “Pascal’s Wager" is good to think about here. Blessings! 🙏
@tmerk4292
@tmerk4292 3 ай бұрын
Wow! I love the idea of the Egyptians putting "attention to error" on the most high. That explains so much about their culture and makes my mind spin with ideas about how much we are missing in translation.
@oldchannel2015
@oldchannel2015 3 ай бұрын
Very good conversation. Thank you! Very stimulating and important information... XO 💕
@Sisyphus40
@Sisyphus40 3 ай бұрын
I just finished watching this today. Dennett was a formidable thinker.
@PaulVanderKlay
@PaulVanderKlay 3 ай бұрын
Oh boy, DD and JBP. This should be interesting.
@soulfuzz368
@soulfuzz368 3 ай бұрын
Some of us are more interested in your take afterwards Paul. I can’t wait
@SpiritualPsychotherapyServices
@SpiritualPsychotherapyServices 3 ай бұрын
philosophy: the love of wisdom, normally encapsulated within a formal academic discipline. Wisdom is the soundness of an action or decision with regard to the application of experience, knowledge, insight, and good judgment. Wisdom may also be described as the body of knowledge and principles that develops within a specified society or period. E.g. “The wisdom of the Tibetan lamas.” Unfortunately, in most cases in which this term is used, particularly outside India, it tacitly or implicitly refers to ideas and ideologies that are quite far-removed from genuine wisdom. For instance, the typical academic philosopher, especially in the Western tradition, is not a lover of actual wisdom, but a believer in, or at least a practitioner of, adharma, which is the ANTITHESIS of genuine wisdom. Many Western academic (so-called) “philosophers” are notorious for using laborious sophistry, abstruse semantics, gobbledygook, and pseudo-intellectual word-play, in an attempt to justify their blatantly-immoral ideologies and practices, and in many cases, fooling the ignorant layman into accepting the most horrendous crimes as not only normal and natural, but holy and righteous! An ideal philosopher, on the other hand, is one who is sufficiently intelligent to understand that morality is, of necessity, based on the law of non-violence (“ahiṃsā”, in Sanskrit), and sufficiently wise to live his or her life in such a harmless manner. Cf. “dharma”. One of the greatest misconceptions of modern times is the belief that philosophers (and psychologists, especially) are, effectively, the substitutes for the priesthood of old. It is perhaps understandable that this misconception has taken place, because the typical priest/monk/rabbi/mullah seems to be an uneducated buffoon compared with those highly-educated gentlemen who have attained doctorates in philosophy, psychology and psychiatry. However, as mentioned in more than a few places in this book, it is imperative to understand that only an infinitesimal percentage of all those who claim to be spiritual teachers are ACTUAL “brāhmaṇa” (as defined in Chapter 20). Therefore, the wisest philosophers of the present age are still those exceptionally rare members of the Holy Priesthood! At the very moment these words of mine are being typed on my laptop computer, there are probably hundreds of essay papers, as well as books and articles, being composed by professional philosophers and theologians, both within and without academia. None of these papers, and almost none of the papers written in the past, will have any noticeable impact on human society, at least not in the realm of morals and ethics, which is obviously the most vital component of civilization. And, as mentioned in a previous paragraph, since such “lovers-of-wisdom” are almost exclusively adharmic (irreligious and corrupt) it is indeed FORTUITOUS that this is the case. The only (so-called) philosophers who seem to have any perceptible influence in the public arena are “pop” or “armchair” philosophers, such as Mrs. Alisa “Alice” O’Connor (known more popularly by her pen name, Ayn Rand), almost definitely due to the fact that they have published well-liked books and/or promulgate their ideas in the mass media, especially on the World Wide Web.
@thenero9493
@thenero9493 3 ай бұрын
Yup 👀👀
@WhiteStoneName
@WhiteStoneName 3 ай бұрын
Hi. Neal told me about this... He said it really takes off at one hour in...TGrogan death blow.
@mcmosav
@mcmosav 3 ай бұрын
Well well well if it isn’t the goodly pastor
@joecurran2811
@joecurran2811 3 ай бұрын
Is this Dennett's last interview? Bit ironic it's with religion's most prominent academic proponent. He will surely be missed. RIP Dan.
@omgitsatree4503
@omgitsatree4503 3 ай бұрын
​@@billyb6001Failed attempt
@Brenthias
@Brenthias 3 ай бұрын
Rest in peace, Dan. Thanks for the lessons, and thank you, Jordan, for having Dan, one last time.
@neoepicurean3772
@neoepicurean3772 2 ай бұрын
As a close follower of Dennett's work, I don't know how I only just found out about his passing. His work on memetics, compatibilism and consciousness (obviously) have really enriched my thinking. RIP and thank you.
@tttrrrification
@tttrrrification 3 ай бұрын
Love this conversation
@markaubuchon2227
@markaubuchon2227 3 ай бұрын
I like how many things JP can say “I’ve been thinking about that for about 10 years…”. He truly has a marvelous mind.
@VoloBonja
@VoloBonja 2 ай бұрын
He says that as „parasitic phrase”. Doesn’t add anything to discussion…
@mitchellaitcheson4557
@mitchellaitcheson4557 3 ай бұрын
One of the best conversations I've seen from you yet! Thanks for your work, Jordan.
@gold_apple_vn4657
@gold_apple_vn4657 3 ай бұрын
1:22:00 epic! straight out disarggement with what Jordan touted everywhere, that religion is no longer needed, I don't understand why Jordan stopped the conflicted by just going a base-level deeper! You really are the most powerful intellectual, Jordan!
@vancamerawoman7399
@vancamerawoman7399 3 ай бұрын
What a great discussion. Jordan is always both professor and student simultaneously.
@thomasgill223
@thomasgill223 3 ай бұрын
Notice Dennett completely did not answer the (vital) question: What is the highest Good? Unless you think the highest good is a perfectly constructed machine gun, you will be disappointed with his non-answer. In essence he said I don't know what it is exactly because it is ineffable, and the only thing I can tell you is that it is evolving, because we wouldn't want to live in old testament times now, would we? The implicit suggestion is that human morality is evolving in a positive direction of which Dennet cannot describe any single feature of, or what this human morality is evolving towards, but it is a real thing, and it is the Good. This sounds fairly religious to me, but hopelessly muddled and vague (like I find most of his "philosophizing").
@rndyh77
@rndyh77 3 ай бұрын
Agreed. But still, conversations like these help me analyze, rationalize, refine, and formalize my own ideas.
@ThePenitentChannel
@ThePenitentChannel 3 ай бұрын
I appreciate your comments. This conversation, for me, put on display two different dimensions of perception capacity. Interestingly, Dennet referred to light, and how does that light get into us and do its work which seems to connect with his observation or perception that mankind seems to be getting better, although he didn’t explain the reason(s) why mankind, fundamentally, needs to “improve” morally to begin with, which is what I wanted to highlight as part of the differences in perception capacity between the two men I.e., one who has as eaten from Life and one who has eaten from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil which by default results in a different capacity of perception. To begin with, it limits Man’s perception capacity solely to the 5 senses blocking out or cutting off the spiritual capacity of perception which is to perceive of & by the knowledge of God. This is why mankind from birth can look at creation and out into the vastness of space, and instantly feel a soul level emptiness, with no perception of God, because he is now outside of a their perception capacity. The light he referred to, unknowingly, is the light of the life of God in Christ as Jesus mentioned directly in the gospel of John. The dynamics of perception that Peterson & Dennet referred to impacting physiology and intellectually, with about this and intention, or all packed into the words of life himself that is Jesus Christ The dynamics of perception that Peterson & Dennet referred to impacting physiology, about-ness, intention, are all packed into the words of life Himself that is Jesus Christ who is the “target” Peterson alluded to. I can hear Dennet’s desire to experience what is in the light and pray for this for him. What do you think? 🤔
@EvertVorster
@EvertVorster 3 ай бұрын
Really nice converstation between two people who has had a massive formative influence on my thinking.
@philwalkercounselling
@philwalkercounselling 3 ай бұрын
So respect these two speaking. I hope for more.
@Ashley.Ramsey
@Ashley.Ramsey 3 ай бұрын
After so many struggles I now own a new house and my family is happy once again everything is finally falling into place!!
@dandimit8463
@dandimit8463 3 ай бұрын
I had kinda stopped watching this channel because of too many ads. The name Daniel Dennett brought back memories of my atheist podcast days 10+ years ago, so decided to give this one a shot. Brilliant and worth getting thru the commercials, which seem to be less than I remember. Thanks for putting this together. I may listen to this one a few times.
@alaron5698
@alaron5698 3 ай бұрын
You can just fast forward past them, so I don't really see the issue.
@NathanGuerraTV
@NathanGuerraTV 3 ай бұрын
Interesting take on the trades being made with your time and theirs...
@dandimit8463
@dandimit8463 3 ай бұрын
@@alaron5698 I listen to videos on my phone while I work. Fast forwarding is inconvenient. I pay for KZfaq premium to avoid ads.
@christinan8059
@christinan8059 3 ай бұрын
Just watched you on Dr Oz KZfaq after watching your Piers Morgan interview. You have a new sub. Love your mission and hope for the world. Just excellent hearing your emotional connection towards humanity & saving many. Former Social Worker - from Canada as well. My best wishes to your continued success in helping others.
@leesmoak3125
@leesmoak3125 3 ай бұрын
This was the most exciting conversation! Thank you! Took me to new levels of thinking about consciousness. It was, to me, so poetic to think about how a human moves up in obtaining free will by learning to control our emotions and motivations! In today’s discussions with so many thinking we don’t have free will.
@juanmiguelgarridogil3396
@juanmiguelgarridogil3396 3 ай бұрын
DANIEL DENNET, EL MAS GRANDE. TE VOY A EXTRAÑAR MUCHISIMO , INFINITAS GRACIAS POR TU CONTRIBUCION, INMENSA RACIONALIDAD, EMPATIA Y SENTIDO DEL HUMOR. UN GAME CHANGER UN ICONO
@francisguevara1688
@francisguevara1688 3 ай бұрын
Así se habla😢
@alin999
@alin999 3 ай бұрын
Dr. Dennett said it very well here: ''You complicate things way more than they needed to be''.
@lzzrdgrrl7379
@lzzrdgrrl7379 3 ай бұрын
Then you've got the H.L.Mencken response: "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong"........
@jg6972
@jg6972 2 ай бұрын
and then critisized the "simple, convincing and wrong sollutions to complicated problems"
@libertasinfinitum6657
@libertasinfinitum6657 2 ай бұрын
Whoa!! I came to the comments to find out if there was a forum for open discussion on these topics. I'm saddened to find Dr. Dennett is no longer with us. Thank you for your contributions, and I hope you've found all the answers needed to rest in peace.
@jasonking9984
@jasonking9984 3 ай бұрын
spectacular conversation thank you both
@FigmentHF
@FigmentHF 3 ай бұрын
RIP, Dan, Beautiful mind.
@michaelz6555
@michaelz6555 3 ай бұрын
Rest In Peace, Dr. Dennett.
@SpiritowlTV
@SpiritowlTV 3 ай бұрын
This is one of the best interviews I've ever seen.
@TaIathar
@TaIathar 3 ай бұрын
This was a very good episode. I'd love to see the continuation of this.
@reinforcedpenisstem
@reinforcedpenisstem 3 ай бұрын
It was rad.
@mischake
@mischake 3 ай бұрын
Awesome Dannett is still kicking. Gonna enjoy this
@danielm5161
@danielm5161 3 ай бұрын
Yeah it's good to see Jordan talking to people like Dennett, he is one of the bets philosophers of our time
@AndrewBrownK
@AndrewBrownK 3 ай бұрын
he's OLD but I hope he feels proud of his life because he deserves it
@shanerogowski
@shanerogowski 3 ай бұрын
@@AndrewBrownK 82 is the new 60
@ondrejdalik6221
@ondrejdalik6221 3 ай бұрын
Didn't age well
@drose91
@drose91 3 ай бұрын
Damn that joke didn't last long
@ourblessedtribe9284
@ourblessedtribe9284 3 ай бұрын
This is really good. Peterson at his best. Thank you both
@VoloBonja
@VoloBonja 2 ай бұрын
Talking three times more than guest is his best? Using simple ideas wrapped in fancy words is best? I wonder what worse version could there be. Weakest Dennett interview I’ve heard, considering Dennetts books, ideas and the amount of topics touched by him
@flamechick6
@flamechick6 3 ай бұрын
Loved this talk, but like all things, it must come to an end. Rest in Peace Dan Dennett 🕊️
@LilaSilk
@LilaSilk 3 ай бұрын
Thank you genlemen for this inexhausting, great converstaion. All the best Mr Dennett, may we have more of your future conversations.
@mattayoubi9829
@mattayoubi9829 3 ай бұрын
Peterson is sharp. Great questions at the end.
@Neal_Daedalus
@Neal_Daedalus 3 ай бұрын
It’s like time traveling and seeing how far we’ve come.
@mcmosav
@mcmosav 3 ай бұрын
Look at us…
@Neal_Daedalus
@Neal_Daedalus 3 ай бұрын
@@mcmosav amen brother. Missed you this evening
@jimluebke3869
@jimluebke3869 3 ай бұрын
History has not ended, imagine my shock. =)
@Beautyargentina6
@Beautyargentina6 2 ай бұрын
Humanity lost a lot when we lost Mr. Dennet.
@amandaecheona1457
@amandaecheona1457 3 ай бұрын
Thank you for this thoughtful and paradigm provoking conversation
@alanarcher
@alanarcher 3 ай бұрын
"Free will is an achievement, not a metaphysical endowment" - Dr. Dan Dennett Well, this is revolutionary to my mind
@UpCycleClub
@UpCycleClub 3 ай бұрын
1:09:18 Whose paper is this?
@traveel9409
@traveel9409 3 ай бұрын
JP said he’d put it in the discussion notes
@williammunkacsy1403
@williammunkacsy1403 3 ай бұрын
Wonderful insightful discussion. Thanks for bringing these to us!
@MikeMontgomery1
@MikeMontgomery1 3 ай бұрын
This was a fantastic discussion, thank you for this. Dennett is such a brilliant mind.
@cecilcharlesofficial
@cecilcharlesofficial 3 ай бұрын
I drop some version of this on a lot of Alan Watts videos, because the thought process (which hit me about a year ago now) feels great to write out each time, and it's pertinent here: because Peterson and Dennet are talking about emotions and free will. And because I’ve come to the realization that we’re not in conscious control - nothing is. It seems to me that it's easily provable once you've been walked through it, and it leads to the faith we all hear about, but which very few actually have. Basically, the secret is this: "We don't control our thoughts. We don't control our feelings." Alan Watts says it numerous times, and a look at one's own life and consciousness proves it to be true. Thoughts just pop into our minds. Desires (or distastes) just pop into our awareness. We learn, surely. But we're not in charge of when we learn. We don't go and rearrange our neurons to finally 'get it.' No, it just happens. Just like you can't force or trick yourself to love someone just by saying "I love you," nor can you have faith on purpose. Again - we don't choose thoughts, and even if we did, what would that be? Looking in a bag of thoughts and picking which one you wanted? Well, how would you know which one you wanted? By how they feel, or the presence of some other unchosen thought going "That's the one I want." Except we don't choose how we feel. We just feel. What does this mean? We're not in control. Of anything. Yes there are always options, and a wise person sees more options and longer-reaching implications. But no choice. Just the doing. "Neither fate nor free will," says Watts to Elliott Mintz on a great YT interview if you haven't heard it yet. Nothing is in control, because consciousness is the AWARENESS of will, not the choosing of it. So, perhaps we do have free will, but what that will is (your set of personal desires and personality characteristics) is not up to conscious awareness. You don't choose what you want. You just want it. And perhaps your desire palate changes over time - fair enough - but you don't choose to change. You just change. And so you can really let go, since what thought pops into your head next is truly not up to you, even if it's the most logical, useful, necessary thought. It's simply not up to you. I'm not saying things are chaos, or meaningless: no, you always feel something about life and its meaning at every moment. Some version (simplistic or nuanced) of "This is good," or "This won't do." You conscience is always there, too. Even if it's not always right, it's always there. So begone moral relativists and nihilists: you're STUCK WITH YOUR CONSCIENCE, in whatever form it is in that moment. So where does this leave us in our journey of letting go / satori / enlightenment? You're totally not in charge and thus it's not up to you IF you let go, so you can finally let go of worrying about letting go. And thus you start to let go. The second half of the trick is this: teach yourself to feel your body. Basically anxiety is an icky feeling in our bodies telling us we don't like XYZ. It's the feeling of "I can't take this anymore" that makes us lash out and act in ways we regret. But instead of masking it (with pleasure or drugs), or ignoring it (by clenching our muscles inside and soldiering on), there's a third option: teach yourself to feel, in every moment you can remember, the subtle vague feelings of fear that are somewhere in your body at nearly all times. They're little clenched muscles. Go feel them. Put your mind on them (around your heart, in your face, around your voice box, in your abdomen) whenever you feel anxious about anything. You're not admonishing yourself for having fear: rather, try something you haven't ever tried before: put your mind on the icky feeling of fear that's in a physical location in your body (tensed muscles and fascia) and hold it there. Over and over and over and over and over. Try. Hold it there. Watch as your muscles finally begin to relent (if only momentarily) just because you LOOKED at them long enough. Watch how you feel when you realize you’re able to hold in your mind that nagging discomfort that’s been there for a long time. Watch how you feel when your little muscles/pains finally do relent. In those moments of paying attention you start to handle situations with grace. No longer are you feeling like "I've had it up to here," because you're teaching yourself that yes, you CAN feel a much wider range of things than you thought. That's real courage. And all based on the final reminder that we're absolutely not in control. But we can learn. This version of you that arises in these moments that you remember: it’s as the Tao describes: “Kindhearted as a grandmother, dignified as a king.” It’s a better version of you, in those moments. And so we simply keep positioning our brain to feel, and to hope we learn while knowing the learning isn't up to us. It's faith. It's why the entire Bible is full of stories about faith in God. It's why Jesus tells us not to worry, and not even to ask God for things since he knows what we need already. It's real faith. It's just sad that faith, to Christians, has become the fervent 'professing of belief,' rather than actually believing that you're not in control, and thus that, in some large way, God must have it covered. You don't have to feel the latter (that it's gonna be ok), but the more you realize you have zero control, the more the "it's gonna be ok" faith starts to bloom. You're not in control. But there's still meaning. Faith.
@VaughanMcCue
@VaughanMcCue 2 ай бұрын
I stopped reading your story because I found it hard to concentrate. You do control your thoughts, and here is a silly example. I am sure you were not thinking of a green monkey wearing orange socks and gloves. Until you visualize it, it will not exist. You will forget that image in a couple of days because you are in charge of your thinking. You will return to thinking about the monkey if you write 'green monkey' at the top of your diary every Monday for the next three weeks. Look on ytube for Mara Gleason regarding the control we have over thoughts.
@SuperHamsters777
@SuperHamsters777 3 ай бұрын
Finally more Dr. Dennett content! He's the brightest flame from the four horsemen, but the least visible!
@adamsmith307
@adamsmith307 3 ай бұрын
He clearly has a prejudice against religion.
@SuperHamsters777
@SuperHamsters777 3 ай бұрын
@@denroy3 he doesn't speak in those terms and its silly to put those words in his mouth. Him and Jordan didn't disagree about anything.
@marcchampagnephilosopher
@marcchampagnephilosopher 3 ай бұрын
Agreed.
@BrooklinFunkProject
@BrooklinFunkProject 3 ай бұрын
@@domepuncher The point is that Dennett is not willing to contemplate Peterson's definition of the animating spirit as religious. He dismisses the idea to the activities of organized religions. These are different things. it's also very interesting as a generational Harvard alum, he finds no trouble today with the current state of academia. Perhaps having been raised in Beirut by a father who was a spy has something to do with his deep seated hatred for the country that has given him his easy life of tenure, awards & sailing....
@SuperHamsters777
@SuperHamsters777 3 ай бұрын
@@domepuncher Hitch was truly a beautiful orator, but 2010-ish Sam Harris is the GOAT debater. I have a lot of reverence for Dawkin's body of work and of course his invention of the idea of "memes". I think Dennett may be the low-key smartest of the group, though: I can't tell you how thrilled I am that him and Jordan couldn't find anything to disagree on.
@ameyc2
@ameyc2 3 ай бұрын
thank you this type of discussion is so important on the learning aspect and 😊😊showing us that two people can come together and try to meet in the middle i see both joining in the middle we just have to see that all roads lead home or to rome
@jennymcgowin9140
@jennymcgowin9140 3 ай бұрын
Superdooper interesting conversation! Thank you both!!❤❤
Daemons, Demons, God, & the Meaning Crisis | Dr. John Vervaeke | EP 414
1:30:04
Do We Have Freewill? / Daniel Dennett VS Robert Sapolsky
1:07:42
How To Academy
Рет қаралды 217 М.
Mom's Unique Approach to Teaching Kids Hygiene #shorts
00:16
Fabiosa Stories
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Я нашел кто меня пранкует!
00:51
Аришнев
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Daniel Dennett: Breaking the Spell - Religion as a Natural Phenomenon
58:44
The University of Edinburgh
Рет қаралды 182 М.
Information, Evolution, and intelligent Design - With Daniel Dennett
1:01:45
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 557 М.
Steven Pinker Meets Richard Dawkins | On Reason and Rationality
1:11:34
How To Academy
Рет қаралды 289 М.
Jordan Peterson: How To Become The Person You’ve Always Wanted To Be | E113
1:04:11
Dan Dennett: Responding to Pastor Rick Warren
25:31
TED
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Bad Therapy, Weak Parenting, Broken Children | Abigail Shrier | EP 427
1:41:28
Climate "Science" | Dr. Richard Lindzen | EP 320
1:49:52
Jordan B Peterson
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН