!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣

Semis in our part of the world are allot more skookum.

@@AnOriginalKZfaqr skookum? Lol

Thanks, silly amateur mistake from my side. I learned not to rush the videos since screwing up a couple of times. Added the info in pinned comment, thanks again man!=)

M I never made trucks

Some do not; would never own one of those. Don't know the reasoning behind this.

In my humble opinion EV's won't solve anything. I think you know very well about battery production (and mining materials for them), recycling, and other issues like absolutely not-eco-friendly production of electrical energy in many, many places. I'm a massive car lover and I love IC engines but I'm not an anti-EV-zombie either, I'm just a real thinking person. Wouldn't mind having some simple EV myself to take those 2-3 km strolls to friends' houses or a 7km stroll to the nearest town for shopping and stuff - ICEs don't like being run constantly without reaching operating temp - EV won't mind. But if I needed to hop in and go on a 1000km journey, I'll choose a fuel sipping turbodiesel that will do this on one tank rather than screw around with an EV. Everything has it's time and place. Anyway, the problem aren't even EVs themselves, the problem are the morons up there PUSHING and FORCING people to SCRAP and RECYCLE their old, PERFECTLY GOOD cars and KEEP BUYING new stuff as often as possible, therefore producing MUCH MORE UNNECESSARY WASTE and KILLING THE PLANET. Simple. This is exactly contrary to reducing footprint. An old car being run for 20-30 years* is wayyyy less of a nuisance to mother Earth than 5 new cars, ICE or EV doesn't matter, produced in the same time. Also gassers can run on alcohols and diesels can run on waste oils. Be it used vegetable oil from french fries or a mix of waste engine and gearbox oils. The vegetable oil's "ecofriendliness" is not even a question. Running on waste motor oils etc. will be probably more ecofriendly than using ordinary diesel fuel specifically produced only and only to run diesel engines. Provided the diesel engine is tuned up to burn the alternate fuels as thoroughly as possible and doesn't leave a greasy smokey trail of half-burned oil behind it. Incomplete combustion of most things creates much, much worse substances than complete combustion, from what I remember from primary school chemistry :D Last but not least, unfortunately the most deadly sh*t is usually invisible and has no smell, like carbon monoxide. *Unless the old car, I don't know, dumps a litre of engine oil on the ground everyday and burns another litre through the rings, but who would keep a car like that without having it fixed? Nobody, it's not economically viable to drive something like that. For me, dream "fleet" is a built street 9000+rpm monster running on alcohol, daily driving diesel running on waste oils and I wouldn't mind a simple cheap EV (...those don't even really exist) to cover the really short distances. Don't even care about the new EVs haha, would be very sound with something like a Peugeot 106 Electrique from almost 30 years ago.

Soot from diesels is pretty harmless to the environment. It just falls out of the air really quickly. What you are seeing in these videos is unburnt diesel, not soot. Also fuck your eco crap

@@WymiataczPlays spot on, well said

fuck the EVs.

Keep in mind the majority of these starts are also from machines over 50-60 years old lol. The majority of mass transit and general machinery nowadays runs a hell of a lot cleaner than your 8V92 in a crackerbox GMC Astro. Nevertheless, for those areas its gonna need a lot more than just a bus with a battery pack. Rails will be where the future of mass transit and heavy transport lies, apart from the fact electric locomotives are a technology over a century old!