No video

F-0582 F-102A The MG-10 System

  Рет қаралды 11,066

San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives

San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives

Күн бұрын

Hughes Aircraft Film showing the F-102A Weapon Control System.
From the archives of the San Diego Air and Space Museum www.sandiegoair... Please do not use for commercial purposes without permission

Пікірлер: 46
@spiritofattack
@spiritofattack 10 жыл бұрын
I flew the F-102 in Alaska from 1962-1964. The MG-10 system was the most advanced intercept system in the world at that time. We did not use the Data Link mode. We added significant ECCM measures which were very advanced for their day. We added one of the first infrared search and track systems which helped with locating and tracking low altitude targets. What we didn't know was that the F-102 could outmaneuver the F-100 and was a better air to air fighter than the F-100. I flew the F-100 in Vietnam, and I preferred the F-102 -- although the F-100 had guns and bombs.
@wiesenbefeuchter
@wiesenbefeuchter 7 жыл бұрын
Did the F-106 use the D/L ? How did the IRST with the -102 work, please ?
@spiritofattack
@spiritofattack 7 жыл бұрын
Yes, the F-106 used data link extensively. See my video about the SAGE system. The IRST infrared search and track system in the F-102 and F-106 was a cooled seeker head which scanned left and right, and we could move it search up and down. It would give a "blip" when it saw something. The cooled seeker meant that it tended to avoid things like natural background heat sources, but the sun is a great source of infrared energy and sun reflections on clouds produced strong infrared signals. The moon also produced an infrared target. There was no indication of how far away the target was, just the angle to the target. With the angle, you could turn toward it and go fast and you'll probably catch it. You could slave your radar to the infrared, so the radar beam would be right on the target and you could get a radar return. Radar would then give you range to the target. This was effective against electronic countermeasures, which would foul up the radar in various ways. With the IR lock-on, the radar would look directly at the target and ignore lots of ECM, and would "burn through" the ECM as you got closer. With the radar giving range information, you had a very good probability of kill. If your radar was not working, you could fire your IR missiles without radar range. I did that personally on a live fire once, but was closer than I thought to the target -- the small drone looked very small, and when I fired the IR missile blew up the drone and I was too close, and had to fly right through the fireball. Fortunately, no big pieces hit my plane - I had only a few scratches on my paint.
@wiesenbefeuchter
@wiesenbefeuchter 7 жыл бұрын
- Could the IR Missile seekers be slaved to it ?- Why was the Falcon that unreliable ?
@spiritofattack
@spiritofattack 7 жыл бұрын
Yes, the IR missile seekers were slaved to the IRSTS or to the radar, as chosen by the pilot. Reports of unreliability of the Falcon are wrong. The F-4 did not have the MG-10 or the MA-1 systems to control the Falcons, so the problem was with the F-4, not with the missile!
@wiesenbefeuchter
@wiesenbefeuchter 7 жыл бұрын
And where was the switch for it ?
@gerryg.302
@gerryg.302 2 жыл бұрын
I went to school on the MG-10 system at Lowry AFB Co. Then worked on the system for 9 years in the AF and then in the ANG of South Dakota and Texas. It was a complex analog based system' I still remember doing computer checks out in the snow, on the ramp, at Goose Bay Labrador. The electronic boxes all had a number (computer was the 046 unit). 017 unit was the antenna dish. How I can remember that after 60 years is beyond me!
@h.hornblower8942
@h.hornblower8942 5 ай бұрын
I went to the same school in 1956 and then to Youngstown Municiple Airport. We had F-86Ds until our Deuces were delivered. Unfortunately the Air Force was moving senior Sergeants into our career field because they figured they would stay in. We had almost no opportunity for promotion. We were given a choice of going to Thule in Greenland or an early out. They lost 97% of our shop. We had good times. Did you ever find a big enough screwdriver to work the upper electronics bay?
@spiritofattack
@spiritofattack 7 жыл бұрын
Deiter - Yes, the F-86 could out-turn the F-106 below about .9 Mach, especially below 30,000 feet. At high altitude and speeds above .9 Mach, the F-106 would dominate. In a continuous turn the F-106 much more powerful engine would maintain the F-106 speed better than the F-86, which would lose energy and slow down. The F-106 had much more power and could "disengage " or run away at any time. These same comments apply to the MiG-15. "Never turn with a MIG". The F-106 should disengage, fly out of sight of the MiG, and come back using radar and missiles.
@justforever96
@justforever96 Жыл бұрын
I have been trying to find out more about these second gen radar systems. Mostly what did the operators actually see, how did they use them? It's hard to find much about it. You hear them talking about them seeing blips or using them to target ground targets, but what does that look like?
@arthurhu2290
@arthurhu2290 7 ай бұрын
If it takes 16 seconds to get missile ready to fire that would not work very well in a dogfight with a fighter. This was all oriented to shooting down bombers
@snipernipernipe4261
@snipernipernipe4261 Ай бұрын
That and it's primary missile armament being the AIM-4 which has its fair share of reliability issues.
@thetreblerebel
@thetreblerebel 4 жыл бұрын
So the F102 from what history has taught me is that it wasn't a capable interceptor but the IR made it a combat aircraft that should be taken seriously under supersonic or trans sonic conditions..I wonder what a turn n burn engagement with a Mig21 or Maybe a Mig17 would be like against the F102 delta dagger...?
@wiesenbefeuchter
@wiesenbefeuchter 3 жыл бұрын
The MA-1 system yet, please !
@gerryg.302
@gerryg.302 2 жыл бұрын
The MA1 system followed the F-102 MG-10 system. The MA-1 system was the new Digital based system that came in the F-106. I worked 9 years on the MG-10 on F-102's but never had the chance to move on to the F-106 MA-1 digital system. Must have been a neat system!
F-0578 Convair F-102 News Report #4
23:21
San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives
Рет қаралды 11 М.
F-0455 Basic Instrument Flying Techniques
30:03
San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives
Рет қаралды 10 М.
WILL IT BURST?
00:31
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
ISSEI & yellow girl 💛
00:33
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН
Nurse's Mission: Bringing Joy to Young Lives #shorts
00:17
Fabiosa Stories
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
F-0696 Sea Dart Final Report
12:56
San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives
Рет қаралды 21 М.
Lockheed's Insane Attack Carrier: The CL-1201
14:21
Mustard
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
F 102A Delta Dagger  Familiarization & weapons systems
25:44
illusive 0ne
Рет қаралды 40 М.
F-0594 Convair F-102 Delta Dagger Video
23:08
San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives
Рет қаралды 210 М.
F-106 Delta Dart - The Unexpected Story - Part 4
22:46
Millennium 7 * HistoryTech
Рет қаралды 37 М.
Flying the USAF F-4 Phantom | Steve Ladd (Part 1 In-Person)
33:45
Aircrew Interview
Рет қаралды 171 М.
F-0575 Convair F-106 Six Shooter Video
11:59
San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives
Рет қаралды 46 М.
Swedish Thunderbolt - The Saab JA 37 Viggen
10:08
Ed Nash's Military Matters
Рет қаралды 129 М.
WILL IT BURST?
00:31
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН