F-18G Growler visiting Finnish Air Force 100 anniversary airshow at Jyväskylä Finland.
Пікірлер: 98
@glenndwyer57863 жыл бұрын
The more i watch these awsome jets,the more i respect the ground crew,all the little things they do that all piolots understand there jet is good.Amazes me.One of those things you will never understand till you have to do it yourself
@hgrgic5 жыл бұрын
Beautiful aircraft. Can`t wait for the Block III superhornet with conformal fuel tanks.
@filibertkraxner3054 жыл бұрын
That's a Navy landing, right there ;-) Perkele! Good plane though.
@mmdoof2 жыл бұрын
My thoughts exactly. Why flare when you're trying to go down anyway 🙂
@billybonesold61806 жыл бұрын
EA-18G-carrier-based electronic warfare aircraft.
@jamesyak526 жыл бұрын
anyone else see him lock up the mains at the end of the runway? lol
@4KI75E4NN3 жыл бұрын
Coolest military jet ever ! And the best is: our German Bundeswehr ordered some F-18 lately. Finally we are getting some really cool and reliable jets for our military :)
@harris84012 жыл бұрын
Did they? German or Finland
@harris84012 жыл бұрын
Nein/ ei
@ariinkeroinen26155 жыл бұрын
Multiple roaring of all these engines, thats a real rare sound! =D
@2566Conan6 жыл бұрын
The growler is a giant leap forward in electronic warfare in the air, can enable its forces to dominate the sky. Outside of the USA only Australia operate the growler.
@Manufly596 жыл бұрын
Lets see what is Finnish choice ...
@harri98855 жыл бұрын
@@Manufly59 She would sure be faster than the Saab & Dornier aircraft from the 90's. ;)
@JorgenPersson-jo4sc4 жыл бұрын
...and soo is the Gripen E AREXIS EW suite...
@valko0224 жыл бұрын
@@harri9885 Saab & Dornier?? What!?? Draken or what, which!??
@valko0224 жыл бұрын
@@JorgenPersson-jo4sc No Fence. But Are You Sure?? Is that really that Good??
@fredriksundberg46246 жыл бұрын
E/A 18 Growler. Electronic/Attack.
@valko0225 жыл бұрын
Not F or F/A, and i think it is not E/A either, but!, EA, EA 18 G Growler. : )
@dixonbidenzmouth4115 Жыл бұрын
The Growler or Grizzly is basically an F model Rhino with EW pods and EW warfare suite
@lintu254 жыл бұрын
Kyllä on kauniita nää jenkkien vehkeet ja mukava möly :D
@willthacker5182 Жыл бұрын
"brakes are a little touchy"
@Asik-abuzittin6 жыл бұрын
F22 1 f18 hornet 2 en sevdigim ucaklar
@tapanitalvinko43615 жыл бұрын
64 tuollaista! Löytyisipä puolustuspoliittista rohkeutta tälläkin kertaa.
@ariinkeroinen26155 жыл бұрын
10 taikka 12 Growleria voisi olla aivan ok. Ilman optiota F-18 E/F Super Horneteista. Osan voisi kattaa robottilennokeilla. Muttei sentään aivan kaikkia. Puolustustorjuntaa kaivataan edelleen totta kait.
@justinmaguire49873 жыл бұрын
U.S. Navy EA-18G Growler electronic attack max speed 1,188 mph
@ariinkeroinen26155 жыл бұрын
Konetyyppi on ollut lentäjiensä kehuma. Tuota ylistyslaulua en voi kiistää. Lyhyt kiitorata-ominaisuus on kieltämättä ollut kiistaton etu. Olihan F-18 alun perin tukialushävittäjä! =D
@thehindukushheights4 жыл бұрын
Wow,,, what a plane... in a previous video, I gave poor comments about such a nice plane... sorry for that.. But may I know what is its comparison to Rafael, f35 and SU35 etc... is it a 5th generation jet?
@_flyingcat_75273 жыл бұрын
F18 is 4th gen
@_flyingcat_75273 жыл бұрын
@Stimpy&Ren i mean id cobsider the su57 to be 5th gen its just theres only like 5 of them
@_flyingcat_75273 жыл бұрын
@Stimpy&Ren yes but it still counts as a 5th gen
@_flyingcat_75273 жыл бұрын
@Stimpy&Ren its not a prototype anymore, a few were deployed in syria. Russia just doesnt have the money to make any more
@smoothuncut4 жыл бұрын
Hard Landing ,Lock up the tires Well OK then........
@SiiliViin6 жыл бұрын
US should have done same with F14, use same airframe and update engines and electronics and it would be still 3rd best fighter after 5th generation F22-F35 planes.
@TheZippaduppa5 жыл бұрын
Nope
@VarvasNukka4 жыл бұрын
IIRC one of the big reason the F14 was scrapped was due to it being sold to certain countries and the possibility of them becoming a threat to the US if support was kept.
@hannukoistinen5329 Жыл бұрын
It's IN Finland boe.
@Rumblingbelly6 жыл бұрын
One has to wonder the cost of shipping these planes here just for this air show.
@Manufly596 жыл бұрын
Yes, direct from New Jersey.
@Manufly59 Жыл бұрын
@Tearjerker yes
@user-im4yc7vg3e2 жыл бұрын
Nice
@seele59866 жыл бұрын
good
@jrppemarti97623 жыл бұрын
0:50 kohdassa "työkoneiden arvonta" on menny nappiin ruohonleikkurikuskilla
@Manufly593 жыл бұрын
Loistava bongaus, tasan ei käy onni tässäkään.
@alexandrossotiropoulos56215 жыл бұрын
The cockpit is like the F35
@hgrgic5 жыл бұрын
That is a block III cockpit, not yet in production. www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/21045/here-is-boeings-master-plan-for-the-f-a-18e-f-super-hornets-future
@alexandrossotiropoulos56215 жыл бұрын
hgrgic So the new Hornet apart from the new cockpit, it would also incorporate irst sensors and other systems the F35 has. Amazing technology.
@peterjaniceforan30802 жыл бұрын
👍yes please
@eetuhannola6 жыл бұрын
Harmi kun ei päässy näkemään...
@rubenheide7324 ай бұрын
northrop grumman GE Raytheon EA-18G Growler
@rolandjosef79612 жыл бұрын
looks to me it had a hard landing.
@eeroaitamaa20124 жыл бұрын
Entä kuka on keksinyt suorakaiteenmuotoisen imuaukon? Onko sen tarkoitus vähentää ilman pyörimistä ennen moottoriin imeämistä, vai miksi?
@jtorst37894 жыл бұрын
tehokkaampi moottori,,maarattu maara ilmaa moottoriin,ei enempaa eika vahempaa! Itse olen sita mielta etta teile sopisi paremmin Venalainen Su-37 havittajaksi ja runnakkokoneeksi Su-34 mutta eihan teile kelpaa Venalainen rauta! Olete niin pakatissa tuohon Usan sotahullu maahan! See on selge!
@henkka4104 жыл бұрын
Suorakaidemuodolla yritetään saada koneesta paremmin tutkassa näkymätön
@jtorst37894 жыл бұрын
@@henkka410 hopo hopo,,
@jtorst37894 жыл бұрын
@@EdKemperISTHEBACK Viddua tikun nokasa!
@Nemesis-on9gq5 жыл бұрын
Growlers can`t replace Super hornet`s or F-35`s
@Manufly595 жыл бұрын
We have now the HX project to replace Hornets. My opinion is that 65 Super Hornets + 20 Growlers would be nice and strong combination for FAF.
@Nemesis-on9gq5 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately we already have Greens and leftists whining about the planned 64 aircraft, so 85 is pretty much a dream not to become a reality.
@Manufly595 жыл бұрын
@@Nemesis-on9gq You are right. Lets see composition of next parliament in Finland ...
@frankeinfish5 жыл бұрын
Or you could go for JAS Gripen E and probably be able to fit 85 into the same budget as 60 super hornets...
@Nemesis-on9gq5 жыл бұрын
@@frankeinfish As dogfighter it would be great, but as a multirole fighter bit too small to carry JASSM or JDAM and after launch still able carry enough payload to engage to a another designated targets and the land..
We should have bought the latest Gripen instead of F 18.
@TheZippaduppa5 жыл бұрын
Did we buy f18?
@TheZippaduppa5 жыл бұрын
No.
@TheZippaduppa5 жыл бұрын
Latest gripen was not made whn we purchased f/a 18 boi
@MeanLaQueefa4 жыл бұрын
The HX program is going on now between F18 super hornet, Rafale, Grippen, Typhoon, and F35. They haven’t chosen yet
@bomben2226 жыл бұрын
Jas gripen
@Karl-Benny4 жыл бұрын
Six people to help the pilot to get into the seat 80 aircraft thats 480 people
@governmenthunter594 жыл бұрын
Good going, slam on the brakes a little harder next time genius.
@bestamerica6 жыл бұрын
' american F-18 jetplanes are the best and beautifully flying... much better than ussr russia cheap low classic mig29
@make543216 жыл бұрын
You compare old mig29 to "newest" US jetplane(and no i dont be russian)
@waynemitchell10765 жыл бұрын
@SMOG The F18/A Hornet you are speaking of is a completely different aircraft than the F-18G we see here. It didn't come into production until 2009.
@waynemitchell10765 жыл бұрын
@SMOG I didn't say it was a 5th generation plane. I said it was a very different plane design to the original F18. Don't put words in my mouth. Just semantics
@waynemitchell10765 жыл бұрын
@SMOG sorry mate. I thought you were replying to my comment 🤪
@valko0225 жыл бұрын
@Stimpy&Ren HORNET, Hornet! Not the SUPER HORNET, the Super Hornet! Super Hornet first flight was in 1995 or 1997! Where this EA 18 G Growler ALSO, also is made and GROWLER's first flight was in 2007 maybe!
@eeroaitamaa20124 жыл бұрын
Kestääkö lähdön valmistelu sotatilanteessa yhtä kauan kuin tuossa videolla? Jos kestää, niin vihollinen on tuhonnut nuo lelut jo ennenkuin ne pääsevät ilmaan..
@Nemesis-on9gq3 жыл бұрын
Eiköhän nuo "hilpase" hieman nopeammin taivaalle jos on tiukka paikka, ainakin toivottavasti.
@harris84013 жыл бұрын
Kyllä sillä veli venäläiselläkin kestää, turha siitä mitään ylivoimaista mörköä maalailla kun se ei sitä ole
@donaldjones49413 жыл бұрын
The elite swordfish enzymatically risk because cocktail phenomenologically prepare underneath a fortunate lasagna. quizzical, dull option
@joeb14424 жыл бұрын
These planes are not Growlers!!
@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM4 жыл бұрын
Yes they're
@ryankc36314 жыл бұрын
Navy carrier aircraft have 3 digit number markings. The first digit in those number identifies the type of aircraft, like fighter, attack, AEW or EW. It helps make it easier for shipboard controllers to identify and control various kinds of aircraft. The "5" in 516 on this aircraft identifies it as an EW aircraft. Among other ways, that's one way you can tell it's a Growler.
@rdr81473 жыл бұрын
The Vienna sausage looking pods on the wingtips are your clue these are Growlers
@jarikinnunen17185 жыл бұрын
Funny, when we were forced to acquire a Russian MIG 21 fighter plane, it was adequate and efficient at that time. Now we can pick, but not russian plane. Is important be in line with nato. Swedish is tolerably in the middle in "red-green lane"? Bad for business.
@ImForwardlook4 жыл бұрын
Ironically, Sweden is the most red country there is....