F-35 DAS

Рет қаралды 1,886,634

14 жыл бұрын

More about the F-35 DAS: More at www.northropgrumman.com/Capabi...
Northrop Grumman has developed the only 360 degree, spherical situational awareness system in the electro-optical distributed aperture system (DAS). The F-35 DAS surrounds the aircraft with a protective sphere of situational awareness. It warns the pilot of incoming aircraft and missile threats as well as providing day/night vision, fire control capability and precision tracking of wingmen/friendly aircraft for tactical maneuvering.
Designated the AN/AAQ-37 and comprising six electro-optical sensors, the full EO DAS will enhance the F-35's survivability and operational effectiveness by warning the pilot of incoming aircraft and missile threats, providing day/night vision and supporting the navigation function of the F-35's forward-looking infrared sensor.
Northrop Grumman Corporation recently demonstrated the ballistic missile detection, tracking and targeting capabilities of the F-35 DAS and AN/APG-81 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, both of which are featured on the F-35 aircraft.
More about the F-35 DAS: More at www.northropgrumman.com/Capabi...

Пікірлер: 396

@RocketPropelledGuy 10 ай бұрын

Most advanced fighter ever, but it appears Northrop Grumman made the commercial in the 90's. All we're missing is a couple of freeze frames

@alexv3357 8 ай бұрын

The core design of the fighter was finalised in the late 90s, so that's not wrong

@jurajsintaj6644 6 ай бұрын

Eh, one would assume that creating modern, high end, beautiful commercials for military equipment isnt very high up on the priority list.

@DIEXEL 14 жыл бұрын

Northrop! You are a multi billion corporation and can't have your videos in HD!?

@kunalmahajan9489 3 жыл бұрын

Lmao, what a crack. But I've seen some Music videos from 2010 or before with same quality

@SherlockHolmes-bc1hv 2 жыл бұрын

Lol

@Rudenbehr 6 ай бұрын

HD was kinda hard in 2010 on KZfaq.

@jurajsintaj6644 6 ай бұрын

@@Rudenbehr And the video might have been even older than that. It was only uploaded on youtube in 2010. And, of course, making their product commercial that are getting released to the public HD probably isnt their top priority

@northropgrummanmedia 11 жыл бұрын

Thanks to all our viewers for helping us reach more than 900,000 views!

@GiftedFestiveBee 3 жыл бұрын

DAS pretty cool!

@rogyrulles4137 3 жыл бұрын

hehehe u have job for Software Engineer??? LMAO

@user-fn5pj1fz6z 3 жыл бұрын

a cartoon that has nothing to do with the real truth of air combat

@bq1000bq 3 жыл бұрын

@@user-fn5pj1fz6z When's your Su-57 Pak Fa Talon going to start mass production? In real life, not cartoon animation?

@excaliber8794 2 жыл бұрын

Jesus it took you 8 years to get twice the views

@ThomasLee123 5 жыл бұрын

The Electro Optical - Distributed Aperture System - DAS is a fantastic addition to pilot awareness. This advancement helps all F-15 pilots do what only the best of the best have been have been able to accomplish in the past. It, essentially, makes our entire pilot compliment into 100% top gun level operators. Distributed Aperture refers to the ability of the F-15 computer to take information from sensors around the aircraft and convert is into a 3-d environment similar to the Virtual Reality available in many games these days. F-15 Pilots are able to see all areas of the combat environment including below and to the rear of the aircraft as though the aircraft was invisible. (To DAS and its pilot, it is.) The difference is that DAS is real live data that gives the pilot immediate knowledge of the wartime environment of the jet aircraft. Top Gun level pilots have been able to do some of this in their heads by interpreting visual and instrument cues in their brain. Now all pilots have this ability.

@c-g9375 4 жыл бұрын

Thomas Lee U most be aware that were ECW come in to play by receiving information admitting aircraft dail in on data then counter measures is applied.

@darren1093 2 жыл бұрын

That is very frightening what it's capabilities are , it's amazing

@patewing5808 2 жыл бұрын

only thing is in reality it is not going to work and DAS system is nightmare so unreliable

@jurajsintaj6644 6 ай бұрын

@@patewing5808 And, I assume that you are senior engineer at Northrop Grumman for you to be so certain about such a system? Or do you have a F-35 pilot or technician as a friend who shares classified information about cutting edge systems?

@patewing5808 6 ай бұрын

@@jurajsintaj6644 Kid I am more then qualified to talk about F-35 then you can imagine . Degree and 40 years of experience in radio physics . So called " stealth " and diffraction phenomena is something I do . Let me tell you something about US military complex . It is purpose is profit not defense of US . The people who write about this stuff in the popular ‘science’ and ‘technology’ media have absolutely NO scientific knowledge or professional credentials whatsoever…they simply repeat the nonsense they are told by various publicists working for the defense industry, and have no proper scientific education to tell what is plausible and what is not…The buzzword ‘fifth generation’ is completely meaningless…it is just a gimmick dreamed up by PR people in the US defense industry in order to create hype among the uneducated and clueless public, so that these companies, like Boeing and Lockheed, can get massive amounts of taxpayer cash for completely unreal and unscientific stuff like so-called ‘stealth’… It’s a magic money machine, based on parlor trickery, and that’s all…

@MrLeet71 3 жыл бұрын

This system has been improved and will be installed on attack helicopters as well.. I'm sure the super Hornets and other aircraft will also be getting the systems and share targeting data and other information

@girlsforstemusa970 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for all you do

@Dragon029 12 жыл бұрын

@atmodom What happens when the Typhoon or Rafale has its radar jammed? DAS is only one of multiple targeting systems on the F-35; for off-bore radar tracking, the F-35 has the AN/ASQ-239 electronic warfare radar suite and for forward / long range target tracking the APG-81 AESA radar in the nose. That's 2 systems providing 360 degree tracking and 3 tracking within an angle inside the forward hemisphere.

@JorgeGamaliel 9 жыл бұрын

Trigonometry everywhere. Trigonometry, Spherical Trigonometry, Euler Angles, Trigonometric Equations, Delaunay triangulation, Propulsion Systems, Chemical reactions, Turbines, Fluid Mechanics, Aerodynamics, The Boundary Layer Theory, Quantum Dots, Nanotechnology,... etc etc. In fact The Air Force is lot of Physics and Mathematics :D

@wombatlover2796 5 жыл бұрын

Yum, yum, yum!!!

@Champ1964 13 жыл бұрын

DAS seems to be a insightful deterrent for future enemy threats. Not that we are currently being threatened, but for those who wish to challenge, may think twice. For those too ignorant to understand the need to be on top, This Technology will also leak down toward other products that make our world safer in all forms of transportation. I applaud DAS.. and recommend a song for use during exercises. put some Flare on it and call it DAZZ from the Music of Brick 1976. lol

@ragingbull8024 8 жыл бұрын

DAS my boy,go F-35.

@danbrown4781 6 жыл бұрын

Gotta say thats pretty fckn impressive and to consider that there are many more classified secrets to this thing maybe it really doesn't need to get in a dogfight afterall

@eugenedowling7380 4 жыл бұрын

Nice!

@fentonreese6935 8 жыл бұрын

Awesome

@Gunni1972 4 жыл бұрын

have you figured out how to eliminate double imaging on the hud, when more than one sensor picks up the same signal? Or are the Pilots still turning it off?

@howardstover4641 4 жыл бұрын

Gunni1972 You trying to prove how much you know? Not impressed

@osakanone 2 жыл бұрын

Its just a dot product of forward vector of vector location of helmet vs vector location of hud. If it scores >0.75f, the DAS linear interpolates its opacity from 100% to 0% as it nears 0.90f. Literally every fighter with a HMD does this and has for the last 20 years.

@youtert 9 жыл бұрын

I hope the DAS has better resolution than this video.

@Retroscoop 6 жыл бұрын

A video of a video of course leads to resolution loss.

@kridadounsattapong1533 4 жыл бұрын

Is tuition it fib,. Rst,. Ultimately fib

@oppo-jm4de 4 жыл бұрын

youtert

@presacveticanin6283 4 жыл бұрын

@@Sm00thieK Car 765

@Cosmosballgarou 3 жыл бұрын

It a scam

@user-xq4pt1qy9x 8 жыл бұрын

In creating the aircraft experienced a technical revolution to change the aerodynamic principle of the creation of aircraft which is used to create planes came gravity.Eliminated the need for the wings in jet engines running on kerosene and in many other ways.

@vladislavsheer1977 7 жыл бұрын

Here there is something non-human: it is worth to detain attention in this miracle, and it is already impossible to tear yourself away from admiration. It's exactly the same as falling in love!

@northropgrummanmedia 11 жыл бұрын

@user-xq4pt1qy9x 8 жыл бұрын

Хорошая аэродинамика самолетов, но технологии, воздушные суда, транспортные средства были изменены.А по аэродинамическому принципу строительства самолетов, вино самотеком с помощью новых физических законов.То, что сейчас скрывается за словами НЛО или летающая тарелка-это только приложение силы тяжести технологии, с набором новых функций для физических.Невидимость для радаров и невидимости в видимом спектре видимости,в то же время, способность летать в пространстве и во времени. Скоростные характеристики гравитационных самолетов, просто не доступны военных самолетов, в том числе и F-.35

@user-xq4pt1qy9x 8 жыл бұрын

Good aerodynamics of the aircraft, but the technology, aircraft, vehicles have been modified.And on the aerodynamic principle of the construction of the aircraft, the wine is by gravity with the help of new physical laws.What now lies behind the words UFO or flying saucer-this is only the application of gravity technology with a set of new features for the physical.Invisibility to radar and invisible in the visible spectrum of visibility,at the same time, the ability to fly in space and in time. Speed characteristics of gravity of the aircraft, just not available for military aircraft, including F-35.

@user-di3jy9um1k 5 жыл бұрын

Все эти ваши мультфильмы всего лишь желания. В реальности эти самолёты способны воевать только с противником у которого нет систем ПВО и современных самолётов истребителей! Посмотрите как Израиль не может применить ваши самолёты потом что у Сирии есть системы ПВО... А все мультфильмы где F35 уничтожает российские С400 это просто фантастика!!!

@pearlharborcauser2020 2 ай бұрын

@@user-di3jy9um1kpropagandaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

@pearlharborcauser2020 2 ай бұрын

@@user-di3jy9um1khow come su-35 got shot down 💀

@justinalevi9038 4 жыл бұрын

You forgot two vay firewalls. Like to listen to the commercial for Kaspersky

@noelpura4223 Жыл бұрын

Amazing 🤯

@KrolKaz 3 жыл бұрын

Sold. id like to buy a dozen, hit me up in the PMs Do u ship to afrika?

@musiomusio3848 4 жыл бұрын

Identify the reality on the battlefield

@lastsion20 12 жыл бұрын

HOLY S*(T !!!! Why didn't we have this when I was flying for the Navy? All I can say is " AWESOME " !!!!!!

@jdouglasusn 13 жыл бұрын

@BoxyTheSpaceDog "why aren't new Russian planes shown in the video,like Su-30Mk2,Su-35.Mig-35?" Because this video isn't about those.

@tobylicious494 8 жыл бұрын

I would say I feel sorry for our enemies but- no; I don't feel sorry for them.

@casey19660 4 жыл бұрын

@landry KAMGA bwahahaha yea whatever moron.

@giko2556 4 жыл бұрын

nice cartoon for "good night kids" ha ha ha - if you're so strong try it-cowboys

@user-xs2vr1fu9m 4 жыл бұрын

มีเอฟ35ไว้ท.อ12ลำพอดีไทยไม่มีดีสำหรับอเมริกาเพราะทหารเผล็ดการเหมือนคอมมืวเมินโลกเสรืทำยิ่งอีกทหารใหญ่

@phoenixdoubledeuce 13 жыл бұрын

@Air2air1 you forgot 2add that the f35 is a nato joint strike fighter program

@Thrax005 14 жыл бұрын

Can I get a job at Northrpgrumman you guys.

@shaind 10 жыл бұрын

Simple EO-IR, which is neither integrated nor giviging 360 degree coverage, is no compared to EODAS.

@ObstinateFanatic 12 жыл бұрын

@atmodom 2:15, that's what happens. Also, 'flying cow' is an inaccurate description, in the September 2011 issue of Airforces Monthly they had this to say "... in terms of manoeuvrability the F-35 will be cleared to 50° angle of attack, similar to the F/A-18 Hornet, with a full load of munitions inside." Also, manoeuvrability may not be as important as you think it is, most modern air-to -air engagements tend to be at long range where the F-35's advanced systems make it lethal.

@vlchhakchhuak607 5 жыл бұрын

Why advertising other product..lockheed martin.?why gruman

@juanproductosdivinamedina9850 4 жыл бұрын

Excelente infomaciones

@normanelison 19 күн бұрын

wow I didn t know this company has a youtube account maybe I gotta check lockheed martin and boeing too

@cannrickyf14 10 жыл бұрын

Look awesome and impresive, only I hope that the President and Congrees dont cut buget to this full F-35 program because then will be handicap and crap F-35. If some dont know yet, the F-22 Raptor had cuts as Helmet Vision hud meanwhile in 2008 the Typhoon was testing their Helmet Hud in Nellis A Base, Red Flag exercices.

@Gunni1972 4 жыл бұрын

no i hope they pour another 1.5 trillions in it, before calling it a dud. that will teach lockheed to make planes, that actually deliver what they promise, on time.

@stephtt1984 4 жыл бұрын

I believe Northrop Grumman since they are succses build Bomber B-52 Spirit

@asianhawk303 4 жыл бұрын

Not b52 but B2, b52 is boeing

@cannrickyf14 10 жыл бұрын

This F-35 advanse hight technology look awesome and impresive but I hope that the President or Congress dont reduce buget to this full program because then will be a handicap F-35 as was the measure to F-22 Helmet Raptor replacing the Hud display.

@davidsalcido383 4 жыл бұрын

cannricky Perez: “ The $2 Trillion 💰🍋JSF-35 promises everything but delivers Little more than more profits to McDonald-Douglas’ War Profiteers?!!!”

@mattm57 4 жыл бұрын

At 4:24 they were targeting vehicles around Angels Stadium 😳

@chandraguptsingh7305 2 жыл бұрын

😂

@Retroscoop 6 жыл бұрын

1) Do only US F 35's have the best DAS (or also the Israeli ones, those of the NATO countries that want to buy the F 35 or already have signed a contract ? 2) How does DAS make a distinction between militairy trucks, ambulances, militairy trucks disguised as ambulances etc. ? 3) Can't DAS be countered by new ECM leaving the multi million system virtually blind ? Add that prospect together with better and more mobile radars and the main advantages of the whole expensive packet might be gone through the drain before very long. Don't forget the plane is supposed to last for the next 30 years. That are quite a number of years either to catch up via spionage and own R&D or to developed effective counter measures. 4) Isn't it such a complex system, that it will be "out" every two weeks, resulting in far too many F 35's in repair ?

@twocansams6335 2 жыл бұрын

DAS is just infrared cameras placed around the jet, to defeat das you would have to defeat a infrared camera.

@jurajsintaj6644 6 ай бұрын

1) If there are going to be upgrades to the DAS system that are hardware upgrades, its likely that the US will receive them first, simply by the nature of it being the main producer of the system. Other nations will most likely slowly receive the upgrade as well, of course. 2) The combination of radar, the much larger IR camera on a swivel under the turret, and the DAS create a relatively high definition picture of the target. I am pretty sure theres a demonstration somewhere on youtube, Ill try to find it. But at that point, its up to the pilot to decide. Also disguising military equipment as medical/civilian while its a combatant its a warcrime. 3)No. DAS is a collection of IR cameras. To jam it, you would practically need to do the equivalent of pointing an IR flashlight at the plane, which would be really short range. And to do that, you would also need to find and track the aircraft. And it can also use the radar to detect ground targets. 4) It is not a complex system hardware wise, as it is just IR cameras. It is complex digitally, however. Digital bugs may occur, but fixes can be done quickly, to every single F-35 at once, instantly.

@themewong7479 2 жыл бұрын

I love das so much it’s give me sense of security

@filipematossilva1154 9 жыл бұрын

Very interesting

@LOHxDOV 4 жыл бұрын

I use 30/30 too

@gaiusdelmonte3631 4 жыл бұрын

Wing Nut

@marauder247 12 жыл бұрын

Too bad your information is hopelessly out of date. The BAE HMD is a backup that only addresses the jitter issues the VSI HMD had with night vision. The BAE HMD is on its way to being cancelled now that VSI has a grip on the jitter issues.

@ermaclenista2259 4 жыл бұрын

Wow a feeler expert appears hahahaha

@Wat-Dat Жыл бұрын

Let your missiles do the turning

@mrkhamesangakhanephongphan6029 4 жыл бұрын

ໃຜກາເຮັດເປັນພໍປານກັນ ສຳຄັນນັກບິນເກັ່ງສຳໃດ

@dannywarchol3063 5 жыл бұрын

Who is current Aopa President ? DW

@judaoverduin2273 7 жыл бұрын

Does it have i7 processor?

@valenrn8657 6 жыл бұрын

It has PowerPC base CPU instead.

@wombatlover2796 5 жыл бұрын

No, its using the 8088 chip set.. much more reliable !!!!

@valenrn8657 5 жыл бұрын

@@wombatlover2796 It's PowerPC with FPGA

@PrithvisAccount 11 жыл бұрын

Lol, Its funny to see how Sukhoi and Typhoon are getting busted. But reality may be different. They may have more sophisticated counter measures.

@iamscoutstfu 2 жыл бұрын

Civilian planes could use a limited version of this.

@denesse03 10 жыл бұрын

This is the reason why the F-35 is so expensive! so high tech for your money to carry! expensive gadgets always better than cheap ones! like cellphones!

@Gunni1972 4 жыл бұрын

i hope it gets so expensive, congress refuses to buy it.

@ACoarseGuy 2 ай бұрын

@@Gunni1972 Hah, too late, they signed the contract and the planes are being delivered, world wide in fact!

@raminabdeshahrei2661 4 жыл бұрын

I don’t think so 🤔

@sismofytter 5 жыл бұрын

Parts of this system is made by Therma in Denmark 🇩🇰

@timmcquearysr5270 9 жыл бұрын

this coupled with the 100 kilo laser, nothing could hit it. save the missiles for some thing else! it could take out every ground and air target in a extremely short amount of time. the only nee for missiles are large fortified targets? ( bunkers ect.) tanks ect. can be taken out with laser! missiles would be for well over the horizon targets??

@scythelord 9 жыл бұрын

tim mcquearysr There exists no laser currently that could be effective against bunkers or tanks. Especially none that can be airborne. A tank would take ridiculous amounts of time for a laser to have an affect on it.

@AbsurdJosh 8 жыл бұрын

+scythelord I think he means against SAMs.

@ermaclenista2259 4 жыл бұрын

Laser might can't But don't be so idiotic guys u.s had a lot of kinds of weapons on its weaponry Don't be dumb...

@mehran808 4 жыл бұрын

f-35 not only can destroy all target on air and graund- on earth but also on mars and venus too

@c-g9375 4 жыл бұрын

jasem adodi u a file🤗

@mehran808 4 жыл бұрын

toro khoda nega ham vatanaye ma

@giko2556 4 жыл бұрын

and throughout the galaxy as well hahahahahahahahahahahahah

@giko2556 4 жыл бұрын

cowboys suck

@ACoarseGuy 2 ай бұрын

Hey! They haven't built missiles that can reach QUITE that distance while being portable!

@SuperiorAmericanGuy 9 жыл бұрын

So DAS will make the F-35 better or worst?

@theguy1633 8 жыл бұрын

+mrwong11989 DAS is the main reason the F-35 is built for the role its designated for.

@timblizzard4226 8 жыл бұрын

Homer Simpson What do you mean?

@edwardrodriguez4312 6 жыл бұрын

Boeingemployee1989 with das,pilot can detect stealth fighters with own eyes when planes give off heat

@valenrn8657 6 жыл бұрын

Izno Iznogoud, that's BS. Rafale OSF’s IRST was a disappointment. The OSF-IT omitted the IR channel altogether. Some Rafale F3s supposedly were even delivered without the OSF. OSF-IT has detection range of 85 km on a clear day. OSF-IT is use for identification not for IR tracking *ODF-IT will be cued by radar, Spectra*, or Link-16. The twin IR channels present in the Rafale F2's OSF will be absent from the OSF-IT. Otherwise, it would have been necessary to address the obsolescence and performance issues affecting the IR portion of the Rafale F2's OSF that are today entering service. To sum it up, the OSF-IT will make do with the TV sensor. This system will be an improvement over the current one (but without an increase in range, since this would have required changing the focal mechanisms), which can already be cued by radar, Spectra, or Link-16, thus allowing it to detect aircraft at 85km, to separately distinguish the multiple aircraft in a flight at around 40km, and even to detect a formation break before it is seen on radar, which provides an undeniable advantage. Nevertheless, the absence of the dual-channel IR will de facto prevent passive air to air combat at night." From Technologie & Armement supplement of the June 2007 Air Power:

@giko2556 4 жыл бұрын

nice cartoon for "good night kids" ha ha ha - if you're so strong try it-cowboys

@Timrem1 4 жыл бұрын

I worked at Northrop Grumman at biz town I was ceo

@WinCan04 11 жыл бұрын

Has this been installed on this turkey yet?

@ermaclenista2259 4 жыл бұрын

U.s back down to sell it to Turkey after Turkey bought Russian air deffense.

@89turbomk3 4 жыл бұрын

Your replying to comment posted 6 years ago, lol

@ACoarseGuy 2 ай бұрын

@@ermaclenista2259 Turkey's always been on the ruskis side. Only reason they're in NATO is because of their highly strategic position and so no one can touch them.

@simulacra7885 Жыл бұрын

The military industrial complex is fucking rad we need to double the defense budget

@Plugneedsahug Жыл бұрын

💀

@newhampshirelifestyle4233 2 жыл бұрын

This technology needs to be deployed at the US-Mexico border.

@haridravanil4228 6 жыл бұрын

I have some doubt that how many dreams come to true in real life

@0MoTheG 4 жыл бұрын

It is a matter of time. The software is under constant development.

@patriced3364 3 жыл бұрын

Such a weird design!

@xliver4 12 жыл бұрын

@azotos Why does it have to only be Americans? Every company does the same thing.

@commercio3564 5 жыл бұрын

*D A S*

@Capn2Mike 13 жыл бұрын

Wow! I want one! Unfortunately - it rolls to fast - I'd get sick :-(

@manilaalmost3872 4 жыл бұрын

Wow😮😮😍🇺🇸

@agustinusnukuboy8651 9 жыл бұрын

Kemampuan Teknologi EO-DAS Pesawat F-35 belum mampu dirancang oleh Tim KFX / IFX. Saya yang sudah mampu merancang Sistem EO-DAS yang setara dengan Sistem F-35 dalam Proyek Pesawat ANFX versi saya. Uji Terbang ini menunjukkan bahwa masih banyak seluk-beluk Teori Dasar dan Integrasi Sistem dan sinkronisasi perhitungan Mekanika Terbang yang lebih inovatif yang harus dikembangkan sendiri dalam perancangan. Jadi ini sudah bisa saya aplikasikan sejak 12 tahun yang lalu, sekarang makin saya sempurnakan saja. Tim KFX / IFX belum mampu, masih belajar berkreasi sampai tahun 2024 nanti, masih bodoh mereka. Presiden JOKOWI harus diingatkan tentang pemborosan anggaran pembangunan di Proyek KFX / IFX ini. Periksa kembali Master Plan-nya yang korup itu, ganti anggota Timnya yang masih lambat mikir, makan gaji buta dari negara. Saya sekarang punya validasi Design Requirement & Objective (DRO) dan data-data Kemampuan Tempur Pesawat ANFX rancangan saya yang sudah bisa dijual tahun 2015 ke Lockheed Martin untuk diintegrasikan dengan assembly Pesawat F-35, atau diproduksi secara tersendiri.

@mbahmoechannel3061 9 жыл бұрын

Wah hebat bgt bapak ini sudah berani menandingi capabilities by Lockheed martin. Any avionics dalam f35 saja masih classified. Bapaknya sudah bisa menandingi millions codes super computer integrated f35..... Hebat bgt sampai aku tidak percaya

@mohammedansari4071 5 жыл бұрын

Best number one, s 400.

@bricksblocks228 3 жыл бұрын

wait f35 lookheed not grummen

@SometimesPie 3 жыл бұрын

wait das northrop not lookheed

@studentloans2488 8 ай бұрын

R&D budget: 421 billion USD Animation budget: 200 bucks

@careerraindrop5564 6 ай бұрын

It's from 2010 you ape

@papiyon66 4 жыл бұрын

Futuro hoy en la armada EEUU alucinante el poder armamentista .

@papiyon66 4 жыл бұрын

@@ciudadmafiosamafiacityarri1859 EEUU sigue siendo el número uno en tecnología y armamento civil y militar incluso se sostiene que tienen una red de naves espaciales en la órbita terrestre

@andrespereydaresearch 3 жыл бұрын

nice arpeggiated hard-sync

@jamesmani5985 4 жыл бұрын

Good fighter But US may not ship to India as India Has S400 systems too

@casey19660 4 жыл бұрын

No. Neither turkey nor india is getting them.

@jamesmani5985 4 жыл бұрын

@@casey19660 but Lockeed is started plant withTatas Indian MNC in South India to supply F21=F22 raptor For medium combat India seems hesitant on the deal

@user-if7bw8ui4p 4 жыл бұрын

Хороший мультик. Только даже против МиГ 21 у него шансов нет.

@robimarenk 10 жыл бұрын

no problem

@quangvien2141 5 жыл бұрын

BÁN. CHO. TAWAI...??...SÁNG. MẮT. OK.......

@scottlucidi6476 4 жыл бұрын

Russia is like "can u rewind that, please?" China is like "copy that"

@Left4Green 6 жыл бұрын

aimbot ffs ;///

@Spartan-op2ed 2 жыл бұрын

Ratheon is building the das system's for cheaper and five times the performance.

@louie55ish 8 жыл бұрын

Scrap the 35, install DAS on the 22. Then you yanks will truly have a world beater like the 15/16 was in the 70s/80s.

@Nicolas-hf8wl 8 жыл бұрын

DUH of course The F-22 already has it too

@louie55ish 8 жыл бұрын

Er... No it doesn't. It has the MLD

@Nicolas-hf8wl 8 жыл бұрын

louie55ish which is basically the same thing FACEPALM

@Gunsncarsnstuff 8 жыл бұрын

+Nicolas Nope

@4CatsGuy 6 жыл бұрын

I totally agree -- scrap the F-35 and install the Electro Optical Distributed Aperture System (DAS) on the FA-18E/F Super Hornet. The unfortunate F-35 is a complete lemon, and will, no doubt, go down as one of the greatest failures in aviation history. The F-35 began its development as the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) in 1992 -- Yes, 25 years ago!!! Yet Initial Operational Capability (IOC) has only very recently been declared in the USMC and USAF in very corrupt testing schemes. And Full Operational Capability (FOC) has not been attained by any service's F-35s, and won't be for quite some time. That means the F-35 remains not fully combat ready. It still has a laundry list of unresolved significant problems, yet over 200 F-35s have now rolled off the assembly lines. That means that all current, and many future F-35s will need extensive rework. At least the Navy has had the good sense to not embrace the F-35, and to purchase the failed aircraft in very limited numbers, as politically required. It is quite clear that the F-35 will be THE LAST aircraft that will be developed for all three flying branches (Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps), and the F-35 program is nothing short of being an albatross/white elephant, and complete waste, fraud, and abuse to United States' and participating countries' taxpayers.

@user-xq4pt1qy9x 8 жыл бұрын

Aircraft built on aerodynamic principle lose aircraft which use gravity(magnetic electric)principle.Летательные аппараты которые строятся на аэродинамическом принципе проигрывают летательным аппаратам которые используют гравитационный(магнитно электрический)принцип.

@frostzxs 8 жыл бұрын

+Иван Иванов приведите пример серьезных преимуществ, а то выглядит как чушь какая-то...

@user-xq4pt1qy9x 8 жыл бұрын

Синтез Ядерный истребитель перехватчик Гладиатор.Применения гравитационных(магнитно электрических) технологий позволило создать аналог НЛО. Гравитационные технологии позволяют создавать искусственную невесомость управлять временем(ускорять или замедлять) что позволяет поглотить импульс РЛС быть невидимым в оптическом спектре и Т.Д.Что бы вывести F-35 из строя достаточно на дним пролететь Гладиатору электроника перестанет функционировать.

@frostzxs 8 жыл бұрын

Иван Иванов нет такого истребителя. Хватит выдумывать всякую херню?

@user-xq4pt1qy9x 8 жыл бұрын

Синтез Вы правы всё это выдумки.

@pepsico815 13 жыл бұрын

Seriously, how many air-to-air combat situations do we even encounter each year? What a huge waste of money.

@ACoarseGuy 2 ай бұрын

Buddy. The thing can carry A2A missiles. And also the F-22 still exists, and the only reason there aren't more is Congress being stupid and forgetting price goes down the more something is produced.

@dave96979 4 жыл бұрын

The F35 isn't made for dog fights, so what good is this product?

@danzervos7606 4 жыл бұрын

Watch the video again and it will answer your question.

@ACoarseGuy 2 ай бұрын

And besides, for pure A2A there's always the beast that is the F-22.

@janegeary6013 9 жыл бұрын

The shoot back missile has half the range of a shoot forward missile because it is expending extra fuel turning in ways conventional missiles do not, so it would only scare off a pursuer who's lining up for a gun kill. This is why 99% of missile fighting is moving your airplane into a position where the missile you're firing has to do the least amount of turning to hit the enemy (has the best kinematics). Modern SAM can fire on the move and detect in bands the F-35 isn't stealthy in, so DAS is a bit useless in that respect. Not to mention DAS is something plenty of other aircraft have (Gripen etc), it's not some new invention. Also DAS and reverse firing missiles can be installed on a WWII prop bomber, if they were so powerful as to make turning useless, why even pay hundreds of millions for a jet airframe?

@valenrn8657 8 жыл бұрын

+Jane Geary F-35 can detect SAM's missile launch can enable F-35 to counter attack. DAS has missile tracking capability.

@valenrn8657 6 жыл бұрын

The Russians has first nuke strike options.

@thekeysersoze707 9 жыл бұрын

There wasn't a lot of new tech here. This system isn't the only one that can provide over the shoulder shots at the enemy. I think SAAB can even do it with the Gripen. Plus i noticed one of the other fighter's was a SU27 and another a Euro fighter, so what your saying is no other country will be challenging with anything more than a fourth generation fighter jet in future? Plus all the SAM's were out in the open, a desert in one scene and a green empty field in another. I do not think their commander will be in charge for long.

@orlock20 9 жыл бұрын

A lot of this technology is old. The Russians created the helmet mounted HUD, the Apache Guardian helicopter has all the sensors, stealth is based around the F-22 and the voice activated stuff is SIRI. I believe the F-35 is failing because there are literally hundreds of different contractors and sub contractors around the world making the parts for these things so there is a lot of room for corruption.

@Dominikmj 8 жыл бұрын

+orlock20 This is a very naïve viewpoint. DAS ist completely different compared to a "basic" HUD. Yes - it all started with an HUD - but it is like saying, that the first IBM PC and a contemporary PC have the same capabilities - and while in theory they are - in reality they aren't! Your latter part of you analysis isn't an argument either. Yes - some of the delays and cost overruns happened due with it... but the whole program had to be restructured and since then made far better progress... and the F-35 is already fielded and deployed [even not with 100% of their final capabilities].

@ACoarseGuy 2 ай бұрын

That's why the NGAD is already being worked on. And besides, I have yet to see a true fifth gen built by the ruskis or chinese.

@EricPalmerBlog 10 жыл бұрын

Great reference for false advertising.

@user-di3jy9um1k 5 жыл бұрын

@giko2556 4 жыл бұрын

cowboys ate crazy mushrooms-ковбои ели сумасшедшие грибы

@ACoarseGuy 2 ай бұрын

Alright buddy. Stay in your S400 truck while a HARM comes your way without you even knowing...

@adrianwilliams8278 8 жыл бұрын

The only reason the f-35 will need off boar sight weapons is because it can't dogfight,maybe the U.S should just stick to SAMs

@valenrn8657 6 жыл бұрын

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j5p0irtet56xdWw.html F-35A vs F-22A vs EF Turn.

@valenrn8657 5 жыл бұрын

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oZmSYMVom5i1go0.html Super Hornet's high AoA+minimum turn radius advantage holding it's own against F-15's high energy turn rate advantage dogfight example Original source (non-English) suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/ Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish) nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/ More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot. I quote _Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo_

@andycroucheaux4568 10 жыл бұрын

All i've ever seen it do is a simple roll ...! CAN ANYONE SAY DIFFERENT ?

@mattslattery4107 8 жыл бұрын

+Andy Croucheaux Vid on youtube of it doing a semi cobra check it out

@LanceWinslow 13 жыл бұрын

Wow

@gremwheper 6 жыл бұрын

HOOYAH America

@michaelwestmoreland2530 Жыл бұрын

Stop the cap. Stop the cap RIGHT NOW, stop the cap. You are NOT selling me on an IRST with both the raw Agility AND sustained thrust necessary to pull a damn 180 degree turn, and then kill, off a PASSED MERGE.

@ayiearjuna69 4 жыл бұрын

totally underestimate their enemy.. in real combat, u not only have DAS but ur aircraft will blast off in the air.. 🤣🤣🤣

@jaysmith6864 4 жыл бұрын

will blast off in the air -- LOL!

@ermaclenista2259 4 жыл бұрын

And how do you possibly do that? Hahaha your not paying attention I think..

@seanyboyo1969 4 жыл бұрын

Your name gave me a bigger laugh than your illogical comment, :D MuhaMAD Naz(r)i ! Got to say that the connetations of the word play was just so perfect.....