They need their own class.

@@desk-kun Indeed. Formula 1.5

@@TeslasSecret On the Autosport podcast, they've just started actually using that term to describe McLaren and almost Renault who are catching up to the big 3.

@@path_090 Oh I didn't know that. I guess that great minds really do think alike then! 😂

Williams will be faster and richer than you ever be dickhead

It was called GP2... Now they call it F2... Williams is competing for F2 lap times.

There's one thing Williams does, that mercedes doesn't... They exhibit class... Their drivers are first notch, and are far better at sportsmanship than the crybaby who won the championship last season... Every time there are adverse conditions... You'll see just how inadequate the mercedes drivers are...

Steven Hollenbeck aaand? They are not their to please you, they are their to win races, in the heat of the moment you want what ever edge you can get in a sport where one millisecond counts....tbh you sound like the crybaby lmao

@@omarxtyson1448 From someone who apparently cares nothing about sportsmanship, or fairness... Where I come from... Those are far more important, and far more conducive to real civilization... I can guess right away where you're from...

Steven Hollenbeck you don’t sound so polite assuming where I’m form and pretending to sound like you know how I am, I said that he can act however he wants because he owes nothing to you, not that I would do the same, I’m my own person and don’t judge people unlike you

In many sports the better teams get more money. Just search Premier league team broadcast right earnings.

@@nishhnishh1088 lmao watch the video

Life is not fair

@Izan TM you seem to be the one who doesnt want to accept the way things work

@@alvmusic4402 In fairness Mercedes era only feels boring now because Bottas can't compete with Hamilton. For a good few years the main story of the grid was the rivalry between the Hamilton and Rosberg, who pushed themselves farther than ever before. IF teammates are allowed to compete with one another, we can still have a good time. The problem is most big teams (cough Ferrari cough) DON'T do that and favour one driver over the other.

F1 needs Ferrari. The sport wouldnt be the same without them whether you like it or not.

@@Skantezz ferrari needs f1 more though. how much money do you think they make outside of f1?

Luo Gqirana have you heard of automobiles?

That's cold but true at this point.

@@Skantezz No it doesn't. Losing Ferrari is like losing a limb or 2 but you can survive without it. This nonsense that F1 can't survive without Ferrari is for the birds and needs to end. Everything that's wrong with F1 is centred around this stupid mentality tbh.

They need to do both

they doing both but everyone is complaining about changing car( lOok it's an inDYCaR) and the fact they changing the amount of money each team gets. only thing people can do is complain about fia

@@matte_luna Because it's true. The veto and payment system is ridiculous and it's showing. People complain about FIA when it gets it wrong an rightly so, time and time again it gets it wrong. Except WRX, Formula E and some junior championships they have screwed things up too many times. It's like they struggle to organise the large championships effectively and it's pretty sad at this point.

@@matte_luna "everybody" is complaining? no, just the slim minority of fans who have the time to comment stuff over the internet. the loud niche. in reality, most people are OK with thee changes. but yea F1 fans are very self loathing.

@@alvmusic4402 everyone in the Italian community is complaining, only thing they can talk about are v12 and 90's

Final Lap total BS they should stop that asap and if ferrari want to leave fine. ✌🏻

@@RumblesBettr Yeah no. Ferrari leaving means pretty much 75% of Italian fans being gone with it, along with *all* of the Ferrari F1 advertising, recognition, branding and merchandise sales it brings. Just seeing the red car going around piques interest in the sport and gains followers, and F1 cannot afford to lose fans at this current moment. So putting up the ✌🏻 is all good and well until you realise the sheer power that Ferrari holds.

F1 will not be F1 without Ferrari. Ask 10 people about F1 , 5 will know about it only because of Ferrari.

Final Lap yeah, look at the premier league, same shit with Man Utd recently. You guys call it bad and unfair, but the teams are so big and prestigious they earn the most amount of revenue merchandise wise, get the most viewers, have the biggest fan base, etc. and you act like them being the king of everything but not being 1st in the racing (right now) means they shouldn’t earn as much. You don’t understand business then, sounds like you have a problem with ferrari being so beloved and the biggest money generate for the sport despite the lack of success recently more than anything.

now Ferrari is second in the constructors

Redbull helps them out

They are a part of red bull lmao

@@shinysniper9537 They can't buy everything from Red Bull though, they have to do their own R&D on other parts like their aero

@@Belteshazzar96 But big brother still help them though.

Yule Balino Red Bull is giving them money, just like the main team

If they do better and get better finishes they will get paid more

They need to somehow acquire better sponsors, and better drivers. Williams was near the top not all that many years ago. But Kubica is washed up, and Russell has never been anything. Same with racing point, and Mcclaren. Shit sponsors and drivers who can't last a whole race.

@@damienirvin777 McLaren?

@@damienirvin777 Russell out races Kubica every race with the same car, which means he is a consistent driver. The car doesn't allow them to push for the midfield. Given that Russell won the GP2 Championship (where all cars are the same) last year and finishing over his teammate in almost every race. U can't say he has never been anything. He is a good driver who made a bad decision in joining Williams

@@MayconMLG McLaren have the best drivers of the midfield at this point. This guy clearly doesn't know what he is talking about.

infact there isn't! XD

Loyalty to f1 isn’t a obvious thing... especially when it’s 90 consecutive years that you are racing.

Futt Bucker search: “90 year anniversary Ferrari” they did it this year. Don’t comment like an angry envy fanboy if you don’t know

Futt Bucker Mercedes retired

@@hohohihi1664 ignorant at its finest

If you don't value loyalty in your life thats on you. FIA does. Ferrari never left

Ferrari will threaten again to leave lol

@@somethinghappenedyesterday6558 And get a bigger "loyalty" payment to stay or F1 will die without them. One way or other, the system self-perpetuates

Ferrariman601 not if someone happens to match schumacher

It's like a test season

Skip f1 2020

at the rate we're going it's just not going to happen

@@hakimkamaruzaman9218 well......

seems to indicate Ferrari need more money to achieve the same result or how else can the payments be justified.

@@An.Individual you can't really come to that conclusion. Mercedes has probably more money spend by Mercedes itself than Ferrari spends on its f1 team. The overall budget has more than only pricepools

@@BruKfu Your point is right but the fact is that Ferrari spend more than Mercedez and Redbull from their own capital.

@@BruKfu true but even then they are just a couple of million dollars behind merc. ferrari isnt organised enough and that has been their problem for a long time.

Mercedes just being german, efficient and effective with their budget and 6 world champions in a row really shows it.

Big fact, Ferrari isnt F1 and a lot of the fans of their better years have already left as F1 has been going downhill recently. With the amount of money they receive let them leave for a season and give the mid field a cut of that pie, now that Mercedes is so dominant

Without Ferrari, there is no F1. It just makes it another pointless racing series. Ferrari are what make the series the self-proclaimed #1 as they are the only team worth racing against, even when losing (if you followed F1 1985-1998, you'll know what I mean). The only racing team to build road cars. All the others are either road car constructors that race or buy in their parts from other companies.

BaioWithMayo go ahead, F1 is already boring af right now,, declining, and you say “hey let the most prestigious popular team ever leave” like that wouldn’t do shit. You guys are ignorant af. It would take over a generation for the sport to recover, most of us grew up on the v10-v12 F1 engines, this new shit is fucking whack.

Ferrari should quit f1 for a while and focus on their gtb 488 in Le man since that what people will actually buy and not a f1 car. After Chevy cry foul on Ford GT and the 488 because Ford and Ferrari gap the Corvette by 10sec in a matters of a few laps.

Benjamin Franklyn Le man? The partner of Le woman? And what do you mean about the 488 and "gap the whatever whatever by the whatever by whatever in a matters (!) of a few laps? Ole Benjie must be choking on his kite strings with you using his name!

Άγγελος Αλεξάνδρου honestly asking this, but who tf is Williams?

@@Alex632 its a team and the father of the driver invested millions in the team but they still got the slowest car i believe

and red bull

Mostly Ferrari tho.

I don't mind Mercedes getting alot of its money because it actually earns it.

I'm a Mercedes fan too but its well deserved money for success and not for merely existing like Ferrari

I'm a Ferrari fan, and I don't think this system is fair. I want Ferrari to win, not run away with all the money...

There are some loopholes in the price cap, and I think heritage funds are one of them. Don't quote me on it, though.

Because Italians

That is the single reason why I will forever hate Ferrari.

Savory Marvis my point!!!

ninjaplease but then again, toro rosso is an italian team and they do a good job with their budget.

Mclaren is also the third most successful team in F1 team and also with high budget .. Look where they're were from last 5 years . Also look at williams and it is 2nd most successful team and look where they're now . Sometimes it's not about money . In this sport a lot many factors come into play and every era it will be one best constructor like mercedes now and redbull in 2010 and ferrari 2000's . Transition will happen and sooner or later mercedes dominance will also come to an end.

Not really, Claire has no passion, she's just a family wife keeping it running

@@geert574 Claire doesnt design the car.

I hope someday William come back to the top.

@@TrueFireMessiah she is the CEO and she is responsible for the overall operations and organization of the company. And it's operations and organization are garbage. Paddy Lowe came from a very high, responsible for a lot of performance, position from then-4-time-champions Mercedes and took the SAME POSITION at Williams. Where is he now? That shows you how disorganized and ass-backwards Williams is as a company. The head of the company is responsible for that, even if he or she is not the one running the windtunnel or assembling the cars.

They will just stop supplying the engines

And also, if it's only the top 10, that's how we lose the little teams. E.G Manor in 2016 :(

The slow death of car racing that isn't electric is hilarious. If you're that way inclined.

Except it's not dying

Formula 1 is already dead

@@Cube8 it's more like those chicken that have their heads chopped off and keep on running about :-)

F1 is not dead... they just need a younger perspective and a young marketing team.

Ryan Z Hello darkness my old friend. 😂

Alpha Tauri soon. 😏

vayha79 I agree but just say it nicer bro

vayha79 I agree but just say it nicer bro

Software called start practicing a sport and stop being a typical Indian IT nerd

@@nishhnishh1088 damn bro do you ever look at yourself and just wonder "why am I a dickhead?"

So is anyone gonna answer his question or?

Probably Blender. It's free software.

Absolutely amazing. Take the top 3 teams out of the championship and you get a hyper competitive one instead of the predictable boring trash we have today.

@@arrgghh1555 None (but you I guess) would watch F1 without the top teams.

@@danielegarja Rebull has only existed for 15 years, and Mercedes for 10. People watched F1 long before they were around and would continue to if they didn't exist. The only one that would make any real difference is Ferrari, but despite what the fanboys think they are not essential.

The main reason for this is that the cars in general got more reliable. Nowadays a technical breakdown (engine, gearbox or whatever failure) is much more unlikely then back in the 90s or 2000s. Not even talking about the 70s and 80s, where a car broke down like every 3rd race or so. So nowadays the topteams are finishing much more consistantly at the topspots then back in the days. So there is less chance of grabbing a podeum, or even a win by luck for the smaller teams.

Hans Wurst all the teams have been pretty much evenly reliable since 2000 of course there are instances but overall they are pretty much all reliable. I wouldn’t say it’s the teams being consistent. The problem lies in the fact that Lewis or Max or Vettel can start from the pit lane and still get to 1st-5th. whatever is causing that gap between the top three teams is the problem. It can’t be money because McLaren have shit loads of money. Renault just pumped a billion dollars in.. its not money it’s the engine Formula. Merc and Ferrari have the power units so they win the most. It can’t be anything else. Then... the smaller teams are having to buy these engines at a huge cost and not getting the same performance from them as the manufacturers are. (The new rule change should stop that) but still. I cannot see how it is anything but the engine formula that is holding the others back. And it won’t stop until it’s changed to new engines that are simple designs then independent builders can make them for the teams. Or at very least it will be transfer the pressure back to manufacturers to make sure the product is the best it can be because the competition in the market is there. This redistribution of wealth shit and it’s not fair sounds like socialist bullshit to me. It’s never been fair, life is not fair stop blaming failure on others success. Rant over

@@turbotoez3539 Sry, but did u watch any GP of the 70s, 80s, 90s or so? All "surprise" podeums or even wins came through mainly breakdowns and/or weather issues. (most famous Panis winning Monaco).

Hans Wurst yeh the did. But we are not in the 70s 80s or 90s so it doesn’t matter. The cars hardly even resemble those cars anymore. There was plenty of small teams winning and podiums from 2000 onwards because of weather. Pure speed. Breakdowns. Whatever. But we don’t need to go back 30-40-50 years that’s all I’m saying.

@@turbotoez3539 Teams in the 2000s being reliable? BMW and McLaren are weeping tears at the mere suggestion. They could have won championships during the Ferrari era if they actually had been. Unreliability basically ended Mika's career, that's how bad it got - 7 retirements in 2001, plus 1 DNS. Of course, that's pretty good compared to JPM in the same year - 11 retirements! Now, sure, not all were about reliability, but the teams of the era - including vaunted Ferrari! - were laughable in their operations compared to today.

5:24 me, I don't know

Because you care 😅😂

Because finish 3rd in F1 is not good?

Claudio Secondini when they’re earning that type of money, no it isn’t

What this video doesn't mention is that Ferrari has returned its participatory payment from 2021 plus their veto.

I think you're putting too much stock in Ferrari. A more competitive playing field would make the sport more interesting to newcomers imho that would increase the popularity of F1 worldwide with or without Ferrari.

@@newmenalejandro1362 Still people recognise the prancing horse even when they don't know anything about F1. As many People have said it F1 needs Ferrari and Ferrari needs F1. Without F1 scuderia Ferrari would have no reason to exist and without Ferrari F1 won't have as much popularity as it has right now.

@@Nimsy0001 Ferrari would easily exist without F1, come on now. F1 without Ferrari on the other hand would struggle.

@@newmenalejandro1362 There are more Ferrari fans worldwide than any other team. I live in a Australia and F1 normally gets mentioned when there is an Australian link like track or driver or Ferrari wins. Everyone knows Ferrari

Aditya Sagraha dont perform, don’t get paid. Simple.

Its easy to imagine what would happen then - the big teams would leave and set up their own championship.

That would not boost performance, it would do the opposite, however they could pay out even shares of F1 profits with team & driver recognition being sufficient motivation for competition.

@@deezelkane Nice logic you got there you idiot. How can you perform well without money. Idiot Schwein.

@Mikko Brawn got a car Honda spent 500 millions on before retiring, with an illegal but legalised afterwards diffuser, that dominated the first half of the season. Then the guys who still had money did catch up and he won for inertia.

Agreed!

Just like politics.

For me it's not about who's winning, it's about the lack of competitiveness in the races, I hate Lewis but I dont care if he wins if he had a brutal wheel to wheel all season, but he doesn't.

2nd-4th fastest on the grid every year since 2007 wdc win

Definitely not average, just worse than Mercedes because they’ve been dominating since 2014

Il Papa Vitielo with the biggest payment

Average is Racing Point ect, Ferrari has been either the second or third best team since 2007

I think what he means by average is that if Ferrari didn't have that huge payout every year, they may have fallen behind Formula A. And then becoming average.

I remember when WIlliams was a Class A with McLaren and there was a backmarker called Minardi

yeah, but it's easier to bash evil Ferrari than use logic. Watch old races and the only team you will always see is Ferrari.

Imagine the drop in fans too, the prancing horse is way too well known and has a huge fanbase. It would be a disaster

Ferrari are f1 no ferrari no f1 , it's really that simple

MrCatsEyes nah

@@FikiCar0 yeh

MrCatsEyes no.

because of money

Your comment is simply stupidly racist. And I'm not joking.

Fabrizio Botta If I want your opinion. I will give it to you. Now suck me off 🖕🏻

Fabrizio Botta The truth hurts

NOLA Trader and they still suck

NOLA Trader @ 👏👏👏👏👏 They are brother They are...

I know this and not a big F1 fan

NOLA Trader Everyone who is even remotely interested in F1 knew about this...

If you don't value loyalty in your life thats on you, FIA does. Ferrari never left.

Ferrari are supposed to take less money willingly? Blame f1 management for allowing it, teams are not in the business of declining prize money.

RS24MIRV no, would any team be ok with it?

Mikko bs. Honda had been developing and pouring money into that car for a while before they left the sport. Brawn did something amazing but he didn’t build a car from scratch with no money, that’s for certain.

@@Skantezz exactly, it's almost like they got a championship car with full development.. oh wait, yeah they did. Brawn did well but seriously, they didnt make a car.

@@TheEpicNewman Nah, it wasn't a championship car until he slapped the double diffuser onto it, that was the stroke of genius and the credit for that goes to Brawn GP. That being said, Honda built the foundations.