"Why fair yugitubers don't get subscribers" - Dzeeff

Something needs to be able to be abused. Something at the very least that makes someone go "oh since when could *blank deck here* do this, that's kinda stupid"

"If every part of the deck is unfair, it's probably a meta deck" Says a lot about the game doesn't it?

In Magic, “fair” and “unfair” are common slang for strategies in older formats. A fair deck plays a mix of modest threats and interaction like removal and/or counterspells. An unfair deck is a deck where the main strategy is on an axis that is intentionally difficult to interact with. Note that “fair” and “unfair” here don’t refer to power level. Temur Delver just got a card banned in Legacy, but is generally considered a “fair” deck. Some examples of famous fair decks are: Delver, Death and Taxes, Humans, Death’s Shadow, UW Miracles Some examples of famous unfair decks are: Dredge, Storm, Show and Tell, Vintage Workshops, Burn, Amulet Titan

"Game is broken. You either abuse the game like everyone else or you don't get to complain"

So basically, every deck needs a card that you just look at and say “that shit just strong for no reason!”

I was around back when you had 10k Subs. This is the content I subscribed for. o/ Thank you, Doug.

i would play yugioh again if gamess would last more than a few turns i remember playing stuff like teledad back then and i thought i as high on crack since it was so fast. Now i don't even know how the new cards really work but people have like 3 boss monsters turn 1.

Whenever dzeeff makes a point and follows it up with "which is perfectly fine" you just KNOW that it's actually not fine

Example of overbalancing in fair decks: Stack Reviver being Once per duel It had no reason of being OPD

Thing is, we have balance cards to try and help the rogue decks go up against the meta but then the meta decks abuse them. For instance, we need MST to negate Chaos Max Dragon's effect to make Chaos Max Dragon less of an unfair matchup but then Chaos Max just uses its MST to negate ours.

Q: What do you call a rogue deck that actually wins? A: a meta deck 8)

This thing you're talking about is called a "Win Condition"

Honestly, this is why I can't get into card games, especially Yu-Gi-Oh!. I've tried a few times, but then I end up going against a bunch of players who refuse to let their opponent play the game and it just gets frustrating.

Please consider doing a video called "Is Yu-Gi-Oh glorified solitaire?"

This video highkey makes me wonder why me (and many others) continue to play a game that forces lack of player interaction at high levels of play. This is probably the biggest reason I don't even bother playing IRL. What's the point when it's either you lock your opponent or the opponent locks you.

"If every part of the deck is unfair, well then it's probably a meta deck."

When I feel the temptation to spend my money on yugioh cards all I have to do is listen to your videos and it dissuades me. Thank you

I played wayyyy, wayyyy back when Gravity Bind and Level Limit Area B came out, and when I got both my deck was considered so unfair by my middle school friends I got beat up for it. I think I still have the cards, I'm gonna enter a tournament and tell them dzeeff sent me

I agree whole-heartedly, Red-Eyes is the perfect example. Even if Red-Eyes Fusion didn't have the "no normal summoning or special summoning" restriction, the deck still wouldn't be even close to broken

"There are decks out there that don't do anything unfair" said the man who knows those decks suck

The biggest problem with yugioh is two things 1) negate the activation and destroy it 2)(Quick effect)

Red eyes fusion compared to toadally awesome is probably the best example of what's wrong with Yugioh.

I think that an "unfair deck" is named such because it has its own way of generating advantage significantly more than other decks can or removing advantage from your opponent in a one-sided manner. However the way to gain advantage is usually through 1 or 2 cards and they may have a bricking factor which is a High-Risk over High-Reward factor. Best examples are Brilliant Fusion, Master Plan, Predaplant Cobra, Wulf Lightsworn, basically anything you don't want to draw, but that's why many extra deck monsters are considered overpowered, they can be tutored at any time; ie if Shaddoll Construct were a monster you had to tribute summon, it'd be the most annoying thing to open turn one because god knows you aren't getting two shaddolls on the field without normal summoning, and at that point would it still be worth playing?

I only play 60 one-of normal monsters. Card effects are so unfair

Majespecters- My favorite deck. Unfair Advantages: All of them are Stratos for a different type of card/search in different ways, can “Float” indefinitely, searchable solemn strikes, ties leads to massive plus, all of them are untargetable and indestructible by card effects. Disadvantages: A light breeze can knock them over, backrow hate slaughters the deck, can be slow as hell, MR4, tribute themselves to activate s/ts.

I really like cyberse, but yeah, the "archetype" suffers from being too fair. Even the new support that has a lot of +1 and some +2 it's not enough to be a good rogue deck. But it's fun and all so I still wanna play them xD

When I think of an unfair deck... as in the deck hates itself is the GAGAGA archetype. You basically lose battle phases or additional special summons because you use one good gagaga card. So another deck is the Neos fusion deck. Or Neo special deck. The neos fusion cards go back to the deck during the end phase unless you have a field spell "Neo space" And gladiator beast don't go back to the deck during the end phase. Yugioh is a game of depression xD

As some one who has only recently started looking into YGO again after stopping back in 5ds, I think... (Whenever Blackwing was one of THE decks and had just come out) It's kinda interesting how the meta seems to be going on. I remember there were, I think, 4 main deck metas back then? I looked at some results for regionals and it seems like some deck called "True Draco" is, like... Unbeatable. The top 4 in some regionals were just all some form of that deck. Not sure how this relates to this video in particular, but just the idea of fairness. It seems like the game has gone from different kinds of unfair to a specific kind of unfair.

Anyone remember Dubkdad1? This topic reminded me that he did a video talking about a similar thing many years (Unfair Decks Win)... And BOY does it hold true to this day.

Listen to him kids, I learned this the hard way I spent A month trying to play ghost tricks and the only build that almost worked was the last one ware I finally caved in and sold out out of pure desperosety and used mistic mine and A tenyi card and even then It sucked and I hated playing it out of pure guilt since then I have up the deck but I'll always be sick with the feeling that I could have made A build that worked since it was A deck I loved to play so much

What can I do to make my Celtic Guardian deck unfair. Rank 4's?

My problem is I don’t play any arch type based deck mostly because I don’t have the money to buy individual cards. That’s why I play the Celtic guard deck because the cards are super easy to get. When I built my deck I was learning that I had to have more cards that broke even in my deck. Which helped a lot! Sadly the deck doesn’t have many broken combos but it’s fun to use. Every new support card that warriors get I try to max the card out to its full potential. Like Isolde for example, that card was able to help get more combos going I do have do play bricky equip cards. But I would say the deck is in the “to fair” deck range.

I think this is a nice lesson in "average decks" decks that can pull out some wins but overall are too vanilla to put up good boards or gain good advantage

In my opinion, if you have to win by not letting the opponent play you might as well play Solitaire. I hate the idea of winning because my opponent couldn't do anything.

"if every card was unfair it would be a meta deck"

The fact is, in every competitive game, the most fair strategies are eschewed for the strategies with the highest possibility of winning. Yugioh is no exception, except in the fact that there haven't been a large number of fair decks for a very long time.

This is pretty much the basis of any competitive game. Why do you throw a flashbang in CS:GO? To make your opponent blind while you shoot them, making the fight unfair. Why do you buy items in LoL or Dota? To get better stats, giving you and edge over your opponent, making it unfair. And there is nothing wrong with it, I'd say. My only complaint with Yu-Gi-Oh, which translates to every other TCG game, is that as time passes and more and more cards are printed, the average "power" of the cards tends to go up. Pretty much the effect we call "power creep". And although it's most known effects is making older stuff useless, my biggest problem with it is making new stuff far too complex. Today if you're doing normal summons you're probably doing something wrong, for example. And if the card wasn't printed in arial 1 to make room for all of it's effects, it probably shouldn't be played. Of course, I'm exaggerating, but that's a tendency. More effects and more interactions lead to stronger cards, which force the player to buy them to keep up with the meta and so on. It's not inherently a bad thing, of course, some people love that stuff (otherwise these games wouldn't be popular) and to an extent you could say that with more complex cards and effects you lower the effect of luck in the game, but to me Yu-Gi-Oh is just past the point of complexity to which I would consider it viable for me to put enough time in it to go beyond just casual play.

Strongly agree with this video, I run 3 different rogue decks and built them all around goal of bringing out the potential of certain "unfair" cards in each deck.

As a yugioh player who moved to magic I love this topic because in magic there are “fair” decks. Where you just play creatures and kill your opponent that way. Instead of playing some kind of combo finish. In yugioh though fair decks are just not a thing that exist in any way. You can’t have good cards i in yugioh only game breaking. Just think it’s funny that the game is so power crept and far from what made it fun that we can only accept cards as being good if they are “unfair” enough. Does that really sound like a fun game?

I’d like to see a follow up comparing a meta deck, a rouge, and something that can’t quite hit rouge status and compare the levels and amount of unfair cards. For example, True Draco, Frog/Paleo, and Dark Magician.

A good example of this is Goukis. By the numbers, you would almost think Goukis should be meta: they generate insane card advantage, they float on like modest mouse, and they spam links with the best of them. But they aren’t doing anything competitive... because they’re too fair. They don’t interact with the opponent most of the time, short of setting up their beatdown strategy, and they never do anything that would make the opponent throw down his hand and shout “ugh, this is bullshit!” As a result, for all their card advantage and floating, they’re only just okay

By this logic, any rogue deck could be good if they just play all the hand traps and can muster what little amount of power it takes to deal 8,000 damage. These days, that's so easy.

Please do a video about that Blue-Eyes deck!

"dinossaurs aren't unfair",are you forgetting they have their own stratos, rota, solemn judgment on legs and solemn strike on legs?

I run Ancient Gears with Avramax to increase damage effectiveness for AG, but I still have to rely on outside support such as Pot of Desires or Saryuja to boost my consistency as well as Ash Blossom or Ghost Ogre to allow me to win on either my first or second turn. This is basically "Pay to Win"

I lose to dark magicians more often than i do to blue-eyes. Hate em

I think if you have a deck full of harpies, you can be at an unfair advantage if you're up against Harpie Lady Phoenix Formation, Harpie's Feather Storm, or Harpy's Feather Duster (assuming it's off the ban list) Back in the anime, Mai was MERCILESS with her harpie combos.

That's why I have never achieved my friend's W/L ratio with my Gemini decks (he's playing Union, I'll let you guess which ones). I don't have an unfair summon from the extra deck

I 100% misread the title and thought it was "fairy" decks don't win lmao- good thing you explained the real title right away

Card games live and die off Aysymetric design. For some TCGs, it's a bunch of decks with various strategies and some decks counter others, ala pre-X series buddyfight. In other's it's everything is broken so it's fair, Pokemon TCG does that really well. Yu-Gi-Oh doesn't quite snuggly fit in that second category as it looks like they are trying to "balance" it sometimes, but I would put it there.

This reminds me of a game called Yomi. The designer was testing the decks and knew that the meta tended towards breaking the mechanics and creating these dramatic power setups. He wasn't going to get into that part of it at the time and went with more normal decks playing the game the way he intended. He came to the realization that the game was more about skill, it was emulating a fighting game and so the game is about knowing when to push and when not to, so rather than allowing for those extreme advantages he changed the rule set to keep all the decks fair

This is a harsh truth for some players that want all decks to be of equal power. Also a good video for when I'm helping someone get into the game and they're under the impression that something like Dark Magician is broken.

What would you say could help a rogue Noble Knight deck be more unfair?

yup, i totally agree here. in duel links six samurai are a perfect example of this.

Yeahhhh do a videoo about that blue-eyes deck

What about my infernoids? Theyre all DD Crows with board clearing effects, liked the vid (:

My Red Eyes deck has a ton of ways to get three Flare Metals on the field turn one,, and my opponent usually dies after activating six effects if they didn't hard draw tribute/bounce removal or something like book of moon or a good amount of interruption.

Cyber angel Natasha... good cheater card. Cyber angel Vrash (the stampede... could not resist pun) when opponent already has there field set up is just plain unfair.

I agree. The whole point of creating a deck is to create a strategy where you can win 100% of the time, which I’ll be honest sounds pretty unfair haha

Ebon Illusion Magician is probably the most unfair card in the Dark Magician Deck.

I haven't played competitively since the Dragon Rulers days back when Tachyon first came out. I was playing Constellars at the time, and from what I understand, it was a rogue deck. I still have it, but I seriously doubt it'd be could viable in today's meta.

I have a different problem with tcg's in general. Back when I was just out of high school, I was introduced to magic the gathering and taught how to play competitively. My competitive mindset was so engrained that I had a hard time playing casual games. I really just wanted to have fun, to build fun combos. But, I have a hard time building a deck that is fun in casual games. Either I intentionally make a deck that's so bad it can't do anything at all or I build it well enough that it may not be good enough to go far competitively, but it still breaks casual games. As an example, I'll talk about my favorite mtg deck I built for casual games. I built it for 3+ player games specifically, (which is a game type that works far better in mtg than yugioh). It was a green/white saproling token deck with a lot of creature synergies to tap or sacrifice creatures for mana, gain life for each creature coming into play, and card draw. It was pretty slow most games, but on average I could get a combo rolling at around turn 3 or 4. One on one, it didn't do much before being crippled. But with other players to focus on with a lot more powerful stuff on the field to deal with than a thallid or two (wait 3 turns to summon a single 1/1 saproling token basically), that left me free to build up to a combo that summoned hundreds of saproling, gain a ton of life, draw my deck, and then fireball every other player and creature with the one fireball I had in the deck for giggles. I've played without the fireball and even the enchantment that gives each creature +1/+1 for every other creature of the same, type which is stupid when there's even just 10 saprolings on the board. Competitively, it's garbage. Casually, it's unfair. I've done the same with total defense wall decks. "You can't touch me and you'll just draw your deck in an hour or so" simply doesn't work competitively, but in casual games it's just infuriating and not fun. So, I'm stuck in the middle. I don't like to play competitively because it's not fun for me, and I can't play casually because it's not fun for my friend(s) who also enjoy casual play. Even just getting preconstructed decks and playing them out of the box. There's something I'm doing that I don't know how to pinpoint. My friend and I just got the old preconstructed kaiba and yugi decks. They're made specifically to be balanced against each other, but I win every time. Doesn't matter which one I play. My friend isn't making bad plays as far as I can tell. We discuss and talk about mistakes, but 9 out of 10 games are my win. I guess what I'm asking is, what would you suggest to a competitive player trying to play casually? I don't care about winning or losing, but I don't pull punches either. Should I intentionally make mistakes?

At least someone can see this. Which is why I say snow doesn't deserve to be hit on the next list, if it is the r.i.p. to my lightsworns

I swear, decks that rely on hard drawing will never ever work. I play Deep-eyes burn for the lols and even though I run 3 of the bloody bricks it feels like it's the exception of the rule whenever they're not literally stacked on the bottom of the deck.

Everything that was said about Toadally Awesome, I feel the same about Cyber Dragon Infinity.

If we define "unfair" by " a deck with something your opponent cannot do" , then it's not surprising fair decks don't win. It literally means your opponent can do everything you can do and then some more. Odds aren't on your side by default. So, expanding on that reasoning : The solution would be to make every deck "unfair", not make them all "fair". Because every deck being fair means a lot less diversity in this game and I like the huge diversity of decks the game gave us over the years and I don't think taking that away would solve anything. Good video, thanks for the reflexion.

Hell, my fav deck is phantasm spiral, pacifis is busted, but you need to build the entire deck around it and the cartds that are not pacifis are just OK

A deck just needs a real win condition. And a lot of bad decks just dont.

im suprsied this needed to be explained each deck should be able to do something unique and strong its not even unfair its how you play the game by picking cards that in combination together are able to beat your opponent like thats why your playing the deck .

My rogue deck is pretty op. Pretty much restrict my opponent from doing literally anything with attack restrictions and barrier statues and burn them to death. The basic idea of the deck is that 1 card of mine can counter 2 of theirs. What makes the deck so OP is cus of Worm Linx which let's me draw a card during EACH endphase (yes that includes my opponents end phase). I get 2 free cards every turn and because the point of my deck is that 1 card of mine counters 2 of theirs (in theory), those 2 draws often give me the resources to further back my opponent into a hole. If I can get 2 worm linxs out I often times actually deck out before I burn my opponent to death

So, back in like 2015 I'd say Towers, and In locals this year I've had stupid moments with Towers, when my opponent doesn't main Kaijus in their True Draco and just end up being unable to get over Towers, and many players not being able to, but now there's quite a few outs to Towers, so, I'm not sure if it's still in that 'Stupidly Unfair' category. I mean..its at 1 for a reason ig 😅

What I really hate (I am kind of a noob and play the online version with all cards against real players, casual only though) is how the opponent on turn 1 does a lot of stuff, sometimes I sat there for a solid 5 minutes because he special summons this and uses an graveyard effect on that and so on. I am a simple man, I just do maybe 2 or 3 things before ending my turn, I don't win often but maybe at around 40% of the time. I fucking hate this, I can understand if you do this in competetive games, as it shows you put a lot of thought into it and made a well structured deck, but in casual? Most people also just copypaste decks they found on the net. When I first saw Pendulum monsters in action and my opponent spawned 5 monsters in one turn on his side, I just forfeited. If you use Pendulum, I forfeit, Pendulum is bullshit. Also games rarely last longer than 10 turns (5 each player), I remember fondly the times of old school Yugioh where it becomes an intense battle for the last few LP.

I wonder if the Skyfang Brigade (I will keep calling them like this) will be a "fair" deck like Cimoooooooo predicted. I mean....if you have Beat and any other Skyfang Brigade monster (below Lvl 5) in your hand, you can pretty much special summon a 3000 Beater with draw and built in monster effect negation from the deck...is this unfair enough? Also access to some neat Rank 2 and Rank 4 XYZs are given...

This is definitely a video for deck-builders. Thanks for putting this together.

While I agree about Eternal Soul's monster popping effect being kind of ridiculous, think for a second, would you honestly believe it wouldn't be on the banlist if it didn't have that drawback? A card that not only protects your Dark Magicians but allows you to grab another one or a card that can pop either one card or your opponent's entire backrow? I guess if they changed it to only destroying Dark Magician then it would be better, but having no drawback on a card like that is pretty broken, imo.

Summarization of Unfair cards: Unfair cards are cards that generate advantage or stop your opponent from playing the game without virtually any cost to the player and don't stop you from playing the game in any way. Examples: Toadally Awesome and Ultimate Conductor like dzeeff mentioned Electrum Needlefiber the Invoked Engine Masterpeace Monster Reborn Instant Fusion Brilliant Fusion Raigeki

So Doug, when are you gonna review my Invoked Predaplant Brilliant-Eyes Spellbook Dragon deck? Kappa

This is actually the reason when viewing deck profiles you'll see the top 32 player say "X card is autowin" In theory what they say is true, but just about every meta deck has it. Also RRs have ultimate falcon, ease of summoning, ease of revival (sharp and RUM), uneffected by everything, puts pressure by lowering attack or burning the longer it stays.

dzeef: dino aren't a unfair deck me:have you read misc

I've stopped playing yugioh because of things like this, though with new archetypes and decks I thought of playing again. I doubt my exodia deck will help much though.

Im an old yugioh player, this new junk is to advance for me. I slowed down around syncros but my favorites were Hero cards. Could you talk about all the Hero Support cards that shouldnt be used? Like a Hero's editorial and how a whole type of monsters were regulated to just absolute zero or now Masked heroes?

Wait so you mean you won't make an Archfiend Marmot of Nefariousness Turbo deck profile?!?1?!!11? Man that's so unfair! You probably don't even realize Pot of Desires is a neg 9 >_>

I agree with card economy, but I think you have to take into account card quality as well. For example, that unkillable Quasar combo with the Brandish spell, Eagle Booster. You now have gone neg 2 to summon an unkillable monster with a free negate of anything who can also attack twice for 8000 possible damage. Is that a bad play, because you went neg 2? No, because the game is halfway over already! Card quality is much less important, but it has to be considered in some cases.

Thanks for the video...i recently got top 32 going X-2 at regionals with Dark Magician and i've been staring at me deck list like what now? This video got the ball rolling again i need more unfair cards besides w/w crystal wing things like dark law and other unfair cards that will help my deck be more "unfair" in general and your comment about the floodgates hit me hard because i was mainning floodgates that regional amd the games i did lose was in fact because i didnt see them thanks for opening my eyes man (again) and helping me be a better deck builder (again) you'll always have my sub keep up the hard work and again...Thanks for the video.

So..."If everyone's playing unfair - that's nothing unfair about it..." Fair enuf... Just remember to embrace your dreams and protect your honor as a duelist...

I have a friend who feels this way about TRAP CARDS in Yu-Gi-Oh in general, not even meta since this is in Duel Links, and it's wild. I told him to put negation cards in his deck if he feels that way and he basically explained he didn't want to put more than 20 cards in his deck...

You know, that's the issue with most card games and part of why I stopped taking them seriously. It's not just Yu-Gi-Oh! There's a deck in Vanguard that gives you two extra turns for free. There's a deck in Buddyfight that can give you an infinite number of them. There's also a card that makes it so your opponent basically plays with half life. Every card game suffers from insane amounts of power creep and it blows. It's not like say, a fighting game where skill decides wins. It's mostly luck and horribly unfair advantages like Towers and Master Peace. It doesn't stay fun like that.

i think the shudderwok deck from hearthstone is great example of a deck having an unfair card while being fair since the deck doesn't do much besides staling and setting up for shudderwock but if you don't die the next turn after you play him you win the game

This is why I play Zombies. Pure zombies with a couple Shiranui can go double Omega 1st turn, especially with Gozuki. We have a 1 tribute Fire Lake. Brillant Fusion is completely busted in Zombies since you can play 2 Garnets, and use Zombie Master or Uni-zombie to get him out of your hand and get some use out of him. Also use Plagues effect to put him on top of the deck and make Brilliant Fusion live again. We can easily go in 6,7 & 8 synchros, rank 3,4,6 & 8's, we has a couple fusion monsters that are pretty good and strong, and can go into link 2's and 3's really easy. Zombie World screws with a lot of decks that need a specific Type. If we have just 1 zombie already in grave we have like 5 Norden equivalents aka 1 card xyz or synchro (Solitaire, Uni-zombie, Zombie Master, Gozuki, Masked Chameleon) and all are searchable.

Your not wrong. That's like every card game. Like playing cards that are "unfair" is kinda how tcg's work. If there were no "unfair" cards, then it would just be a dumb slap fight with pool noodles until somebody eventually dies.

That's what I think of the entire Vendread archetype so far and the same logic applies to decks in DL (Destiny Heroes have Mask Change+Anki, Geargia has Pulse Mines+Ties of Brethren, Sylvans have Rose Love+Komushroom, Aliens have A" Cell Recombination Device etc.)

Madolche Queen Tiaramisu is unfair. Double non target non destruction removal.

I play Dark Magicians. I totally understand why you hate Eternal Soul. I played against Altergeists in my locals last week, they were able to bounce Soul back to my hand easily, I was miserable. But, with Dark Magician the Dragon Knight and Dark Magical Circle, that is the dream “board lock” scenario. But, it’s kinda inconsistent for myself, and after reading this, it’s too “fair”. What do you think I could do to improve this to compete with the REAL META decks?

You have a good point. Decks that are fair don't always win, and this also could play right along with the natural power creep of the game like Blackwings, they used to be unfair and highly abusive but thanks to the natural power creep, the deck and cards have become fair which the except Gofu due Links made him abusive which led to his incursion.

The thing about yugioh is that even the worst made decks can beat the most OP ones if you’re lucky and/or skilled enough. I still otk people with my signature “double dragon master knight” combo to this day (although not nearly as reliable as it used to be).

So... bad designed and op yu gi oh cards is the way to fmgo konami... so we have to spend money on op things and older decks without new op support will never be good forever

Unfair might not be the best term for this. A better way to put it would probably be that in order to be competitively viable, the deck must have some method of tilting the table in your favor, above and beyond just having a big blank beatstick that's probably gonna get nuked with any number of monster removal methods that are making the rounds, assuming the opponent lets that beatstick see the board at all (since most methods of getting said beatstick could also get more dangerous cards if you used them instead, and best not to make assumptions when you're at a tourney). The more heavily a given card tilts the table without caveat, the better. Cards get banned when they either tilt the table to the point of singularity or take a hammer to the table entirely (such as self destruct button). A big attack value can help, but it is not enough to outweigh any useful effect unless the card is also immune to absolutely bloody everything, and very few cards are both of those things for any length of time (and honestly, the immortal card is probably gonna be played regardless of attack value unless it carries a poison pill). The most generically heavy tilt effects are usually ones that interact with card advantage and/or effect negation, hence why Dzeeff talks about those concepts so often when this subject comes up.

I love your videos, man. I’m a casual YGO lover who dabbles in the game every once in a while, but I AM a competitive Smash Bros. player. So I’m fascinated by other games’ highest end meta concepts. You explain things clearly, with a level head, respectful to potential objections, and you know you’re stuff. Suddenly I find myself watching more videos about meta YGO than meta Smash. 😂

I cant believe it, but every time I try explaining something to players, Dzeeff here comes out with a video about it. Dude, can you read my mind?