FAIREY FIREFLY | The WW2 Carrier Borne Fighter, and Anti Submarine Aircraft

  Рет қаралды 21,294

DroneScapes

DroneScapes

Күн бұрын

Discover the fascinating Fairey Firefly, one of the most successful two-seat fighter/strike/attack aircraft used in WWII and beyond. While the type did have some teething problems at the beginning it proved its value across multiple theatres and two wars. The first action for the type was in Europe against the German battleship Tirpitz and then onto the Pacific against the Japanese, Later marks provided valuable service in the Korean War.
Development of the Firefly can be traced back to pair of specifications issued by the British Air Ministry in 1938, calling for new naval fighter designs. Designed to the contemporary FAA concept of a two-seat fleet reconnaissance/fighter, the pilot and observer were positioned at separate stations. In flight, the Firefly was superior in terms of both performance and firepower to its predecessor, the Fairey Fulmar. Due to a protracted development, the type only entered operational service towards the end of the conflict, at which point it was no longer competitive as a fighter. The limitations of a single engine in a relatively heavy airframe reduced its performance, but the Firefly proved to be a fairly sturdy, long-ranged, and docile aircraft during carrier operations.
The Fairey Firefly served in the Second World War as a fleet fighter. During the post-war era, it was soon superseded in the fighter role by the arrival of more modern jet aircraft, thus the Firefly was adapted to perform in other roles, including strike operations and anti-submarine warfare. In these capacities, it remained a mainstay of the FAA until the mid-1950s. Both British and Australian Fireflies routinely performed ground-attack operations from various aircraft carriers during the Korean War. In foreign service, the type was in operation with the naval air arms of Australia, Canada, India, and the Netherlands. As late as 1962, Dutch Fireflies were used to carry out attack sorties against Indonesian infiltrators in Dutch New Guinea. Its final uses were in various secondary roles, such as trainers, target tugs, and drone aircraft.
The primary variant of the aircraft used during the Second World War was the Firefly Mk I, which was used in all theatres of operations. During March 1943, the first Firefly Mk Is were delivered to the FAA but these did not enter operational service until July 1944, at which point they equipped the 1770 Naval Air Squadron aboard HMS Indefatigable. The first operations were flown in the European theatre where Fireflies carried out numerous armed reconnaissance flights and anti-shipping strikes along the Norwegian coast. That year, Fireflies also provided air cover and aerial reconnaissance during attacks on the German battleship Tirpitz.
Throughout its operational career, the Firefly took on increasingly demanding roles from fighter to anti-submarine warfare while being stationed mainly with the British Pacific Fleet in the Far East and Pacific theatres. The type was used against Japanese ground targets and fighter aircraft. FAA Fireflies carried out attacks on oil refineries and airfields and were repeatedly dispatched against Japanese-controlled islands up until Victory over Japan Day. The Firefly gained a level of public renown when the type became the first British-designed and -built aircraft to overfly the Japanese capital of Tokyo.
General characteristics
Crew: 2
Length: 37 ft 11 in (11.56 m)
Wingspan: 41 ft 2 in (12.55 m)
Width: 13 ft 6 in (4.11 m) wings folded
Height: 14 ft 4 in (4.37 m) including prop disc
Wing area: 330 sq ft (31 m2)
Empty weight: 9,674 lb (4,388 kg)
Gross weight: 12,727 lb (5,773 kg) stripped for fighter mission
13,479 lb (6,114 kg) normal
Max takeoff weight: 15,615 lb (7,083 kg) with two drop-tanks
Powerplant: 1 × Rolls-Royce Griffon 74 V-12 liquid-cooled piston engine, 2,300 hp (1,700 kW) for take-off
Propellers: 4-bladed Rotol constant-speed propeller
Performance
Maximum speed: 367-386 mph (591-621 km/h, 319-335 kn) at 14,000 ft (4,267 m)
330 mph (287 kn; 531 km/h) at sea level
Cruise speed: 209 mph (336 km/h, 182 kn)
Range: 760 mi (1,220 km, 660 nmi) on internal fuel at 209 mph (182 kn; 336 km/h)
Ferry range: 1,335 mi (2,148 km, 1,160 nmi) with 2 90 imp gal (110 US gal; 410 L) drop-tanks at 209 mph (182 kn; 336 km/h)
Service ceiling: 31,900 ft (9,700 m)
Time to altitude:
5,000 ft (1,524 m) in 3 minutes 36 seconds
10,000 ft (3,048 m) in 7 minutes 9 seconds
20,000 ft (6,096 m) in 10 minutes 30 seconds
Wing loading: 43 lb/sq ft (210 kg/m2)
Power/mass: 0.164 hp/lb (0.270 kW/kg)
Armament
Guns: 4 × 20 mm (0.787 in) Hispano Mk.V cannon
Rockets: maximum 16x RP-3 60 lb (27.2 kg) rockets on 8 × zero-length launchers
Bombs: maximum 2x 1,000 lb (454 kg) on underwing pylons
Avionics
Radar
Radio
Night-flying instrumentation / equipment
#aircraft #airplane #fairey

Пікірлер: 33
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
Click the link to watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories, and missions: www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes
@thegreyhound1073
@thegreyhound1073 Жыл бұрын
There's been a trend of designing two seat fighters. If anyone asked my opinion which no one has for the same reasons the Firefly form the 1st time pencil touched paper they knew that with the limited technology available in the early 40's having a navigator/ radar operator and most of all two more eyeballs was worth pretty limited performance loss. I've read in a few articles that imply that FAA flew more night missions than U.S.N. and Japanese navy. Having the pilot and the gib being able to concentrate on finding the boat while pilot can put all his attention to flying just following the directions to the target then back to base. I apologize for any spelling, or improper grammar. I ate more than a few minor explosive blast force TBI's. I'm also a Cajun and 1st generation to speak English as a 1st language.
@madmansprinkles
@madmansprinkles Жыл бұрын
As a kid I never thought it was cooler than the Spitfire, but my opinions changed after really understanding it Genuinely believe now that it is one of my favorite old war planes and I can't help but think of it as essentially being a race car with a flat bed in the back
@julianlau5579
@julianlau5579 Жыл бұрын
The first time I know of this aircraft was when I saw my classmate building one. That was 1/72 Airfix and the most impressive feature was the movable folding wings. Thank you for the upload.
@realnutteruk1
@realnutteruk1 Жыл бұрын
Strangely, there's a Firefly monument, a Firefly on a stick, in the middle of Griffith, NSW, 2680, Australia, some 400 odd miles inland from the sea!
@marklittle8805
@marklittle8805 Жыл бұрын
The British seemed to love the idea of Swiss Army knife airplanes...one that could do many missions
@georgebarnes8163
@georgebarnes8163 Жыл бұрын
Graceful little bird, very underrated
@None-zc5vg
@None-zc5vg 8 ай бұрын
The last Fireflies in service must have been the "target drone" conversions that were being flown (for test/delivery) from a Fairey facility at what was the Ringway Airport, near Manchester, England, in the late '50s. They appeared to be painted maroon or dark red. I found out later that they were destined to be flown pilotless, under radio-control, to serve as targets for missiles. .
@anselmdanker9519
@anselmdanker9519 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting
@geordiedog1749
@geordiedog1749 Жыл бұрын
Great video. I’m actually a big fan of the Firefly’s for-bare the Fulmar. There’s only one left and it’s static at the FAA museum in the UKs West Country.
@kentl7228
@kentl7228 Жыл бұрын
It looks kind of nice, like it could perform, but just didn't have the performance. The little engine that could. It was like combining biplane speed with bomber turning ability. It seems like the British had their naval specifications too complex like the Germans wanting large bomber be able to dive bomb.
@geordiedog1749
@geordiedog1749 Жыл бұрын
@@kentl7228 The Fulmar could out turn even the Italian bi-planes with its flaps deployed. It’s main let down was it’s RoC which was awful, admittedly. The need for large self sealing tanks, large ammo stocks, two crew and the general robustness required of naval aviation meant that the only engine around, although a great engine, still,wasn’t powerful enough for the plane. The RN was badly screwed over by the RAF during the inter war years (bloody Crabs again!). The FAA had to play major catch up once they had control back in ‘39 and at the start of the war as its fighter itinerary had planes like the Roc in it as well as lots Sea Gladiators and Skuas. The RN requirements for the next plane where based on the fact that RN armoured carriers had smaller air groups so their aircraft needed to be able to fulfil multiple roles - hence the inclusion of the wireless operator, observer position in the Fulmar so it could recon. and spot shot fall for the fleet. RN doctrine also required a dedicated navigator as they had found one of the biggest risks to aircraft and crews was getting lost over the sea (pre radar etc). It’s important to remember at this stage the worlds navies ‘Hot’ carrier operational experience consisted of one raid at the end of WWI. The Inter-War US fleet problem exercises , the Japanese Navy’s strategy plans and the Andrew’s carrier exercises were all coming in with differing results due to differing theatres and tactics. The RN expected to be fighting Nazi Germany/Kreigsmarine (zero operational carriers) and Fascist Italy/Regina Marine (ditto) so the need for a fighter to take on other fighters wasn’t envisaged. Royal Naval fighters would take on recon/snoopers, TBs and Dive/Level bombers and the Fulmar was well suited to deal with that type of aircraft and actually did so extremely well. Against modern, monoplane fighters the Fulmars kill to loss ratio was actually 1:1 but the cohort is tiny. Most Fullies were lost to return fire from bombers in later ‘41 and ‘42 when they had more armour plate meaning the Fulmars had to close up to make the rifle calibre guns defeat the armour - usually a hit in the nice big radiator in the nose. Against most fighters it could usually dive away (it was derived from a dive bomber after all) or out turn and evade them. The big question about the Fulmar is this. The chap in the rear would often arm himself. This was never by throwing toilet rolls btw but they did use Very pistols, SMGs and sometimes Brens, Lewis/Savage guns and Vickers K/GOs. The SMGs were described as “Tommy Guns” but this was often used as a generic term for a sub machine gun. They should have been Lanchesters as that’s what the RN purchased in 1938 (while the army were still dithering) but I’ve never found any definitive proof either way. The Fulmar was actually the most successful fighter of the Fleet Air Arm (ie it shot down the most enemy aircraft) and all FAA aces scored vics flying Fulmars at some point.
@kentl7228
@kentl7228 Жыл бұрын
@@guaporeturns9472 I am replying to you on the forebear you mentioned, the Fulmar. To be simple. Slow and it couldn't turn so well. It looked capable, if overbuilt was a piece of junk as a fighter. The specifications created the problem by trying to mix roles together. The Germans did this problem with their heavy bombers and never made a good one.
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info!
@kentl7228
@kentl7228 Жыл бұрын
@@geordiedog1749 Good points but turning ability isn't at just biplane speeds. I understand that the Fulmar did many attempted intercepts and couldn't even catch the enemy to risk or improve the kill ratios. I assume that if you were given the option of a Martlet or a Fulmar, you would rather fly the Martlet. ) I would. Let alone a Corsair (hard to land) or a Hellcat. PS. I do realise that you aren't exactly saying the Fulmar is brilliant or junk, whereas I am perhaps towards the latter. It seems they almost navalised the Battle, not quite serious there. I feel sorry for the Fairey design team because of the specifications, and who made the specifications because the RAF got priority and the Fleet Air Arm got the dregs which created the need for a do everything, imposible wonder plane.
@johnjephcote7636
@johnjephcote7636 8 ай бұрын
Probaly in the mid-1960s I remember passing Fairey's factory when it used to be beside the approach road to London Airport (now Heathrow), There was a stack of Firefly fuselages between the factory wall and the fence.
@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe
@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe 3 ай бұрын
Weren't they absorbed or merged with another company?
@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe
@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe 3 ай бұрын
Did they use of these in the Pluskat strafing scene in The Longest Day?
@JohnnySmithWhite-wd4ey
@JohnnySmithWhite-wd4ey Ай бұрын
Could you imagine taking a sluggish two seat plane against a nimble single seat fighter.
@colinmartin2921
@colinmartin2921 5 ай бұрын
Excellent video, thank you.
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes 5 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@davidneuhauser3963
@davidneuhauser3963 Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
Thank you so very much!
@paulsteele8614
@paulsteele8614 10 ай бұрын
Nifty was the first thing that came to my mind also
@DaveSCameron
@DaveSCameron Жыл бұрын
Appreciate your sharing, working on and posting these Sir. 🇬🇧 📚 🇺🇸
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
Much appreciated Dave!
@RobertMorris-ik9wy
@RobertMorris-ik9wy 10 ай бұрын
Kes me wonder how load the flight decks were on the light fleet carriers were during Korea.
@AnthonyEvelyn
@AnthonyEvelyn Жыл бұрын
I always found the idea of the Fairey Firefly being a fighter a bit weird. It was big, carried a crew man with equipment, and it had to battle Japanese fighter aircraft.
@prowlus
@prowlus Жыл бұрын
It was a requirement by the fleet air arm that even their fighters needed a separate navigator to operate over the seas
@Twirlyhead
@Twirlyhead Жыл бұрын
The owner in the video says it could outturn a Zero. It was also (certainly as it developed) faster, stronger and more heavily armed. So you can stop being weirded now.
@grepora
@grepora 29 күн бұрын
Darn. I thought he was going to show how the Firefly could fly with one wing behind its back. Korea was a horrible war? What war isn't a horrible war?
@Lord.Kiltridge
@Lord.Kiltridge 6 ай бұрын
This is the internet. "We" are not American.
Best Toilet Gadgets and #Hacks you must try!!💩💩
00:49
Poly Holy Yow
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН
КАК ДУМАЕТЕ КТО ВЫЙГРАЕТ😂
00:29
МЯТНАЯ ФАНТА
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
The Flying Battleship Killer
14:30
Dark Skies
Рет қаралды 518 М.
Swordfish W5856 Restoration
58:57
DroneScapes
Рет қаралды 22 М.
Fairey Fulmar: The fleet fighter that 'held the line'
19:57
Armoured Archivist
Рет қаралды 70 М.
Turbo Compound Piston Engines. Almost magic tech.
34:30
Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles
Рет қаралды 744 М.
What Fighter Pilots ACTUALLY Do Just Before Launch
10:58
Growler Jams
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
How a Jet Airliner Works
25:56
Animagraffs
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН
Проверил, как вам?
0:58
Коннор
Рет қаралды 248 М.
Опасность фирменной зарядки Apple
0:57
SuperCrastan
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Как бесплатно замутить iphone 15 pro max
0:59
ЖЕЛЕЗНЫЙ КОРОЛЬ
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Новые iPhone 16 и 16 Pro Max
0:42
Romancev768
Рет қаралды 2,3 МЛН