One more tiny thing I noticed - at about 22:40, the ram air turbine was spinning the wrong way for if the air was turning it. Overall, this is an AMAZING video though, incredibly detailed and informative :)

@@robbiejames1540 It also stops spinning when I'd have preferred that it kept going. Sometimes in the middle of a 7+ day render job with 37k frames, I gotta let some things go or I'll never regain my sanity! But that's why we have the good ol' video corrections thread here. Because accuracy matters.

Finally upload how aircraft works,thank you

@@76mmGMC the only thing that flaps are designed for is to lower the stall speed of the aircraft. Everything else they happen to effect in other scenarios is simply a byproduct of their intend purpose.

@@76mmGMC He said "[flaps] allow for a steeper climb angle... for takeoff and while climbing to cruise altitude." #1 He is correct that flaps DO make a steeper climb angle possible on takeoff. The flaps increase the camber of the wing, effectively turning it from a high speed low-lift wing to a low(er) speed high-lift wing which does, in fact, make a steeper climb-out possible during the initial 1,000'+ climb after takeoff when you want to clear obstructions at a steep angle (Vx), until they are retracted in order to clean up the drag and transform the wing into a clean low-lift high-speed wing and a best rate (not angle/Vx) of climb speed is established. So he was only half wrong/inaccurate. With that said, I LOVE THIS VIDEO. I just love it. It's fantastic. Also, the maker does an EXCELLENT job of being a "jack of all trades" who has to research and process and implement new information he learns about vehicles that he previously may have had basic or minimal knowledge of. #2 Ailerons ALWAYS operate in opposition to each other [EDIT: I have been corrected that this is apparently not true on some fly-by-wire airplanes]. Also, the outboard wing spoilers also help to roll the aircraft (in fact, on many Boeings) the ailerons only function at low speeds when the flaps are extended, and are locked out at higher speeds, leaving only the spoilers to roll the airplane (their drag happens to cause a yawing motion which actually helps the airplane turn, reducing the need for rudder)... Clarification: On widebody Boeings like the 767, 777, 747, when the outboard ailerons are locked out at high speed the inboard ailerons that they are equipped with do operate (all the the time). #3 Something that nobody here knows unless they have designed or assembled airliners/jets is that the center wing section is simply a continuation of the left and right structural wing boxes. There is a join where the wings attach, and the center section is thicker so that it is strong enough to take the flight loads from the wings, but it is very similar with all the same spars and other structural components continuing through it. Also the wing-to-body fairing does not strengthen the structure in any way, it is just a lightweight, thin composite fairing that smooths out the airflow around the wing root. If you want to see a really interesting wing root look on the Airbus A350 and look at the back of it where the flaps stow. It is unique. I LOVE THIS VIDEO!!! You did a fantastic job. Very impressive graphics! Everything you make is super interesting. Thanks!

RIGHT....!

The search is always intense. Sometimes we'll spend days looking for a part, and find it hidden in some obscure PDF or image search. And when we find it, oh man it feels like such a relief. With 3D, the thing has to actually work as it would in real life. You can't guess, or parts won't match up when they animate. I know because I used to make 2D drawings of things and it was possible to "fudge" a little. 3D video is the most exacting medium.

@@animagraffs I just wanted to join in on the celebrations of your incredible intention to detail with every video you release; although this video in particular is an actual triumph in and of itself: just notice how little “corrections” you got in the comments. The aviation community has a tendency to get very persnickety when it comes to design purpose accuracy. That being said, I think I speak for us all when I ask if you’d ever consider releasing some behind screens footage of your process with regards to animation and and rendering: because your animations are so stunning and so precise/accurate, that it would be a shame to not see how you work. Just an idea!

@@animagraffs Bro Which software do you use ?

Glad to have you here on the channel, Mikey :) I was thinking, maybe when we cross the 1mil subs milestone, then we've earned enough "cred" to lean into some of that "behind the scenes" stuff. There's lot of nerdy goodness that goes on! I'd love to show off the complex rigs I build, for example, to run the landing gear. Anyways, yes, I do believe we'll produce some insider content in the future!

Progress baby! I'll bet new recruits can get an easy look at this :)

Dear capt, thanks for your compliments to the creator of this amazing video. Truly nowadays its pretty available. But this content is special, very brief, systematic and as you said includes very appropriate aviation terminologies! This will help revise basics even for an interview. Cheers to the creator. Thanks for you comments capt.

so what ain't gonna matter when your dropping like a stone from an inner tube lol

Keep up the creator of this very informative video.

True, its great video❤🥰

Absolutely agree. I really appreciate being able to have that total view of ""the forest" in the back of my mind before diving into the details of each tree.

Agreed! It is a Most Excellent introductory level description of a 'generic,' modern day airliner, isn't it? Several years ago I wrote an introductory level book called The Jet Transport Training Manual and I would have loved to have something like this available to illustrate my various chapters. My little 1984 Mac would have seriously choked on this level of graphics and illustration details! ;-) ... It got some interest from a publisher but they wanted me to split it into two books - but that kind of negated my purpose - to help pilots transition from general aviation level aircraft to airliners. I lost interest and the first draft still sits on my shelf.

Hey pilot 👨‍✈️ when can we fly in your plane 😆

I will be starting my pilot course this September at Epic, this video is great, I love it.

so you basically just confirmed that pilots have no idea what they are doing and simply push buttons and look cool

You can say that again bro as you said this just outstanding work.

Pushpak viman?

@@user-or1ce7ez5w get lost u fairy tale lunatic 😒😏

@@collinskwaning9004 which is cad used in all work

@@cleverocean8527 please which cad are you talking about, please I don’t understand, explain it

Awesome comment, only gives me more fuel to keep making high quality work :D

@@animagraffs could you make a video describing an f-22 raptor like this? if you did in the past, that would be embarrassing

The kids who get into engineering today see videos like these and get interested, the other kids are busy doing other things. It's really not strange that only a subset of people get into these fields and I think that's fine honestly

You who know nothing about airplane maintenance to be spewing out nonsense.

@@pilotboy217 Haven’t seen a joke before huh?

I kind off wish he talked about door plugs

@@pilotboy217 Boeing isn’t exactly doing great on their planes rn 😂

@@pilotboy217 Obviously a joke.

What a nice comment!

Exactly! Even if the creator didn't narrate and explain the different flight control systems, it would have still been a novel video, nothing on the internet in the public domain matches this. The viewer numbers speak for themselves, there's so many more videos you could make in this genre. Even mini sub videos specialising in how the landing gear works in greater depth etc etc will get you so many easy views! Thanks again!

@@angevivniftcharlo lol programmer works far more .i call bullshit.ui ux designers and designers in general are equally if not more capable than programmers.Comparison in the first place is stupidity.You r the type of people who'd rather torrent and pirate a paid software than purchase a license even if you can afford to buy one.Pathetic snobs.

What a incredible comment...

I love your enthusiasm Bert! So glad you're here with us to enjoy the art my brother and I make.

Wow, beautifully said!

More training than what most new hires get.

Wow

This video helped me a lot. I’m trying to become an A and P.

Try it bro, you can ride the highest speed train for the first time in Southeast Asia. The highest speed is 350 kilometers per hour, the Indonesian fast train Jakarta - Bandung, the newest, most sophisticated in Southeast Asia, the first,.,the way to the beautiful and comfortable and beautiful and cool and cool city of Bandung, thank you sis and bro.,Try it bro, you can ride the highest speed train for the first time in Southeast Asia. The highest speed is 350 kilometers per hour, the Indonesian fast train Jakarta - Bandung, the newest, most sophisticated in Southeast Asia, the first,.the way to the beautiful and comfortable and beautiful and cool and cool city of Bandung, to lembang is Ciwidey ,thank you sis and bro.~*~**~

You must have an FAA license then 🤣🤣 doesn’t take much learning for one of those compared to EASA or CAA

@@bash102you must have no license at all.

@@vanzell1912 why’s that

The video is great for anyone who wants to get an insight into aviation. But it is not for a professional pilot who wants to learn something substantial. And there are many inaccuracies in the video.

@@anasmaaz5731 I disagree, I think this a great video for a professional pilot transitioning into a transport category aircraft. I can't page through the A220 manual to fact check everything, but I wasn't able to find many inaccuracies at all based on knowledge of other similar aircraft.

@@anasmaaz5731 I suspect the inaccuracies you noticed are based upon the dozens of aircraft types and ages and differences between manufacturers. The creator is offering basic and generic information and has acknowledged any inaccuracies that have been brought to his attention.

The A220 is my new favorite narrow body transport plane in terms of beauty. It replaces my favorite… the venerable B757 that is rapidly being retired from PAX service.

You should know better if you actually have those qualifications. This is about as much detail your average layman can handle, and extremely far away from being suitable for 121 training environments.

Doesnt it bother you that the description of the doors is wrong (aircraft doors are actually plugs from the inside that cannot be opened if the pressure is not equalized and the reason for the fancy hinge is that the door must first be opened inward to "unplug it" and then rotated slightly to go back through the opening making it impossible to open if the pressure is not equalized).

@@homomorphic the description of the doors are correct. Perfectly described

He did a lot of research as you can see and appreciate

@@gerharddevos5562 no they arent. They are shown completely backwards. The wider edge is on the inside of the door not the outside as show in this video. The entire reason for the complex hinge is to bring the door first into the cabin, and then rotate and slide back through the opening.

@@homomorphic if you don’t mind me asking, what do you do for work?

👍🏻

Except for the door. he shows the door swinging out. It actually swings in, then tilts to go out. That's how the door cannot be opened because the cabin pressure is pressing it against the frame of the fuselage.

@@peterbradbury7072 you make a fair point. Yes the door does swing in then tilts out but some manufacturers use a different design for the same principle. Here is an example of what I mean. kzfaq.info1tcIeiBCP4U?feature=share

Here is another one. kzfaq.infoEsHgtSTXa7A?feature=share

@@peterbradbury7072 Is that how it works on a 767 and MD10 too?

You like the job? I'm considering going to school for it. I'm just scared of fucking up and going to jail. I have experience on cars, it's still liability. I'm conflicted any advice?

Yeah but it lacks the video of that really cute flight attendant girl on the American Airlines pre-flight safety video.

bro how is life being a Ferrari fan? I bet it hurts every Sunday😂 just jokes!

@@ebenezerd.3701 F1?

Chapters are already in the description but KZfaq's system isn't working on this video for some reason. Argh. I need to hit up their support to likely be disappointed again.

@@animagraffs I think you're missing the 0:00 marker and that's why the chapters aren't worling.

@@geetanshgautam Woah, that fixed it. What a silly error. lol. THANK YOU. I've got a perfectionist streak in me, and this was driving me nuts.

@@animagraffs dude this video IS perfect

@@animagraffs they re working fine with me.

Jake

@@JaycobSirduke “by Jacob O’Neal”

Imagine the amount of work to create all these animations... Incredible.

Megalag ? You here when new vids

A lot of the sentences aren’t even complete? What do you mean carefully placed narration? It’s an actor reading a script that was written by someone who’s first language isn’t English. Impressive animation though, I’ll give them that.

@@CeeJayDee94 you do it instead of anonymously critiquing everyone.grass feels always greener on the other side lol

exactly what i said lol

Dude...... you think only pilots understand how planes work? What about the engineers and technicians?

Majority of Aerospace engineers are not pilots.

@@moeelza7816 he’s not an engineer or technician either

People just like to argue Kevin, don’t answer them. We all knew what you meant.

I've been an aircraft mechanic for going on 5 years now, specializing in Airbus systems, but I've also worked on Boeing airframe as well, and I prefer Airbus, because the fly by wire airframe is superior in my opinion. Couldn't agree more, I love my job, and wouldn't trade a single day doing it for (almost) anything else!

Wes ONeal chiming in here... as the main researcher on the project, I have to admit that no, I'm not in aviation. I just like diving into complex subjects and doing my best to describe them as accurately as possible :) That being said, I did have a slight advantage on this one as one of our sisters is a pilot and flies this airplane; when I would get stuck on something, I could ask her a few questions here and there to get more clarity. It was a blast learning about all of this stuff!

@@animagraffs what aircraft is this modeled after? It seems like it has portions of B787 and A350 but it only has 6 landing gear wheels. As opposed to 10 that those each have, among other chief differences. Also interested to find out which aircraft have nose wheel brakes? This was an extremely informative video as it really excellently shows what systems a particular airframe MIGHT have, as they are all so very unique in their own ways, but gives you enough knowledge that if you wanted to learn the airframe you will already have an excellent X-Ray view of what it looks like. It was difficult at first as an A&P to look at an aircraft and see what was inside of it rather than just see the skin, engines, and wings. Again thanks for the great video

would be cool to add the Ram Air Turbine into the animation as well! awesome presentation! thanks for your hard work!

@@ShakeyBalance looks like an A220-100 to me

@@ShakeyBalance It's an A220

Have uh got job ??

the detail is unreal

There's is a lot broh To learn more about how things work check @Lesics channel HTTPS://KZfaq.com/c/Lesics Good luck 🤞

@@apersunthathasaridiculousl1890 Yes, it is !

A rocket would be fun to research! I'll add it to the list

Lots of details definitely but in total this is just maybe 10% of the actual inner systems of an aircraft

As you can see from this vid, the flight deck is already built, and we're sure not gonna let it go to waste! It'll be up on the channel in the coming months, for sure.

That is a fact.

I didn't know the A220 leaves the wheels out in the open. Not that it matters, I just wish they had covered them for the sake of looks...

@@Greippi10 737 Max has this feature too. Less moving parts such as doors = less weight and maintenance. The outside of one of the wheels serves as cover.

@@yummysatay 737 is known for that, I just thought it was a unicorn. It's such an eyesore :D

👍🏻

@@Greippi10 You will get used to it as I. The wheel wells on the A220 are clean by design as seen on various youtubes. No visible wires or pipes. There are fire detectors to alert pilots of tire fire. I'm liking the A220 more and more.

The A 220, read Bombardier, is a from the ground up new aircraft. Its not a rediddled Caravelle or 737. What a wonderful website, thanks all.

@@basvanderhoek9293 the A320 have nothing to do with the caravelle

From thé engine to the fly by wire the A320 was far away from the modifed comet for shorther flights

Wow, how much this A220 of yours is similar to the Sukhoi Superjet 100 in its internal structure, right down to the location of each electronic unit. In Sukhoi they had to add a rack with electronics behind the chassis niche, because it did not fit in the front compartments. Did Bombardier/Airbus themselves come to such a decision ten years later? And you say "from the ground up new aircraft" xD

I'd like to see this type video production of an old school md-80

The rigorous maintenance schedules and crew training are also a huge factor in safety.

What worries me is the 15 minutes and 13 minutes of oxygen. If there's a fire inside, it must take more time to make a safe landing.

@@KingDudi16 the 13 minutes is just for the time needed to get the aircraft to a lower altitude needed so pressurization is not needed and you can breath air from the cabin or open the doors in flight if there was smoke.

@@pilotken8685 thank you so much for this insight! It didn’t occur to me at all. 13 minutes is generous in this case. I presumed the duration was only supposed to last till the plane managed to find an emergency landing area. Are the cabin doors just cracked open slightly while in flight?

@@KingDudi16 The airplane bleeds air from the engines and pressurizes it. I would assume that they just pour the air without pressurizing. Also, 13 minutes is more than enough to get the airplane to a safe altitude.

A modern cruise ship would be cool

At first i thought it was a 787

it is.

yes i work on cseries....a220 since begining and i can tell you it is a220

Me too! My mom gave me Stephen Biesty's book about Man o' War ships. It was so captivating.