Famous Astrophysicist SLAMS Top Gun Maverick

  Рет қаралды 272,220

Ward Carroll

Ward Carroll

Күн бұрын

Ward analyzes some of Neil DeGrasse Tyson's recent tweets questioning the accuracy of several scenes in "Top Gun: Maverick."
Support this channel by using the SUPER THANKS (heart icon above) or by becoming a Patron at / wardcarroll
Buy one or all three of the books in the PUNK'S TRILOGY, Ward's popular first three novels about life a Tomcat squadron, at www.usni.org/punks-trilogy-re.... Use the PUNKYT discount code at checkout for 25% off to KZfaq channel subscribers.
Also available in KINDLE format here: www.amazon.com/dp/B09R1MX8SY
And as an audiobook here:
PUNK'S WAR: www.audible.com/pd/Punks-War-...
PUNK'S WING: www.amazon.com/Punks-Wing-Pun...
PUNK'S FIGHT: www.amazon.com/Punks-Fight-Pu...
Get official channel gear at my-store-b7f9c9.creator-sprin...

Пікірлер: 3 200
@stevet8121
@stevet8121 Жыл бұрын
I've seen Wile Coyote survive a 300' fall and crushed by a huge rock, so anything is possible.
@dlxmarks
@dlxmarks Жыл бұрын
I believe that Wile E. Coyote lived through situations like that at least twice. Might have happened more than that though. 😀
@dougrobinson8602
@dougrobinson8602 Жыл бұрын
"At 9.8 meters per second per second, Wile E Coyote's speed would be approaching terminal velocity depending on his coefficient of friction. This would clearly be a fatal fall. Also, a coyote can run faster than a road runner."- Neil DeGrasse Tyson.
@stevet8121
@stevet8121 Жыл бұрын
@@dougrobinson8602 Thanks for that.
@cosmicyeti6804
@cosmicyeti6804 Жыл бұрын
Mr. Coyote is still in litigation with ACME corporation….
@uberfu
@uberfu Жыл бұрын
WEC also has survived numerous TNT explosions.
@1919champ
@1919champ Жыл бұрын
‘Tom Cruise type injury, messed up hair……” Best line in the video
@dougrobinson8602
@dougrobinson8602 Жыл бұрын
Hypersonic bed head FTW!
@doorwhisperer
@doorwhisperer Жыл бұрын
followed by the worst: "he didn't know that he was on Earth"
@electrogestapo
@electrogestapo Жыл бұрын
Only Tom Cruise hair can survive such an ejection.
@robertmorris8997
@robertmorris8997 Жыл бұрын
"He was injured, his hair was a little messed up." Had me rolling.
@vergil-__
@vergil-__ Жыл бұрын
fr
@Nomad416
@Nomad416 Жыл бұрын
Hope he can get adequate VA treatment for it. 😆
@robertmorris8997
@robertmorris8997 Жыл бұрын
@@Nomad416 He might die in the waiting room.
@gopichalapathi1223
@gopichalapathi1223 Жыл бұрын
Lol
@iamironman616
@iamironman616 Жыл бұрын
It's Tom Cruise 🤣🤣🤣
@BoulderBoyz915
@BoulderBoyz915 Жыл бұрын
there was actually 7 ejections, it’s barely noticeable but when maverick shoots down the first su-57 and uses it to evade the second ones aa missile the pilot ejects right before it gets blown up, it just shows the amazing attention to detail the crew put in
@elrobo3568
@elrobo3568 Жыл бұрын
I was a career USAF member and also a pilot, Just before going into the top gun movie my friends said OK, don't pick the movie apart, it's just a movie. I kept quiet and enjoyed the movie for the entertainment it was supposed to be.
@Sivvester
@Sivvester Жыл бұрын
It's a fun movie with amazing shots of F-18's that will hold up for a long time that's all I care about, rest of it is a movie which is fine
@jamescooley2604
@jamescooley2604 Жыл бұрын
El Robo. Thank you for watching it and leaving it alone. It most certainly was a movie not a documentary.
@jamescooley2604
@jamescooley2604 Жыл бұрын
@@Sivvester same here with the new one AND the original. All about the airplanes for me.
@jamescooley2604
@jamescooley2604 Жыл бұрын
Ward the B-58 had an ejection pod. When the ejection sequence was initiated the pilot was basically in a cocoon.
@paulw176
@paulw176 Жыл бұрын
I was a Navy RIO. I think I saw you in the my after mirror lookin' surprised.
@marks2920
@marks2920 Жыл бұрын
Bless his heart, the renowned scientist thought the film was a documentary 😮
@Mobius118
@Mobius118 Жыл бұрын
Hardly a renowned scientist, more like a renowned opinionator. The guy spews his opinions and calls that “science,” and people gobble it up because he uses big vocabulary words that sound smart. If you know enough, you know he’s quite off actual science
@selftrue670
@selftrue670 Жыл бұрын
@@Mobius118 Totally agree.
@haroldb1856
@haroldb1856 Жыл бұрын
Neil has a pretty gigantic ... Twitter footprint. I was expecting him to say "ego".
@jimgordon3206
@jimgordon3206 Жыл бұрын
Lol. Good one.
@mattrasp1615
@mattrasp1615 Жыл бұрын
I’m sure he enjoyed the movie. Just his thing to explain the science behind it. It’s not that deep. He did it about James Cameron’s titanic starry night and Cameron contacted him to correct it. It means something to people.
@bloodymarvelous4790
@bloodymarvelous4790 Жыл бұрын
I remember that the Challenger crew were still alive after the explosion, and only died when the capsule crashed into the ocean. They weren't going Mach 10.4, but it can be assumed that when the engines fail in the Darkstar and Maverick loses control of the aircraft, it will bleed off significant amounts of speed as it starts to yaw. It should also be noted that the Darkstar would have to operate well above the stratosphere in order to achieve such speeds, so the air density is much lower than where normal jetliners and fighter planes operate. That he'd still be walking after that crash would be very very unlikely though. To be honest, I have far more of an issue with Indiana Jones, Willie and Short Round surviving jumping from a plane using an inflatable raft.
@katherinestives940
@katherinestives940 Жыл бұрын
I suppose that example is because it's aircraft related, but I will never forget the nuclear fridge. That one went way, way, way out of my suspension of disbelief.
@johnclaybaugh9536
@johnclaybaugh9536 Жыл бұрын
And, in case anyone missed it, it's just a movie. It's weird that some people spend so much time tearing apart a work of art that was produced with the sole purposes of entertaining us and making some people some money.
@moviesgalore9947
@moviesgalore9947 Жыл бұрын
the entire cockpit ejects from the plane so Maverick is safe inside the cockpit which floats down to earth same way a space capsule floats down to earth with 3 parachutes. Anyone who thinks Mav ejected the way a fighter pilot would eject is too stupid to be taken seriously. The Entire Cockpit Section Ejects from the Plane with Mav sealed safe inside it.
@jerryp8990
@jerryp8990 Жыл бұрын
I believe you missed one ejection. The first Russian acft Mav hit with his F14 gun as he passed behind him. After Rooster yelled “smoke in the air”, Mav started to pass in front of that wounded Russian acft so the missile coming at them, would hit it instead. It’s hard to see unless you go frame by frame, but when Mav starts the move to in front of the wounded craft, you can see the Russian pilot ejecting straight up, rockets firing, just before the missile hits the acft totally destroying it.
@PBMS123
@PBMS123 Жыл бұрын
why have you shortened aircraft? By 4 characters? Theres no limit on youtube, and you don't do it to any other word.
@deleted8594
@deleted8594 Жыл бұрын
@@PBMS123 why do you care lmao
@PBMS123
@PBMS123 Жыл бұрын
@@deleted8594 because it looks absurd.
@explicitDTP
@explicitDTP Жыл бұрын
Yes he missed that one!
@fullmoonprepping4024
@fullmoonprepping4024 Жыл бұрын
@@PBMS123 It's called pretentious 🤣
@ConradsStudio
@ConradsStudio Жыл бұрын
The "Pilot" option does explain Jester being known for leaving the fight early in DCS.
@Zach636465
@Zach636465 Жыл бұрын
You do have an option in the "Jester Wheel" to tell Jester to set the ejection seat for himself, or for both. I'd recommend leaving him alone, because he does eject if you do something even slightly sketchy (which I do often as a terrible aviator), but there have been times where he's left me screaming "TAKE ME WITH YOU, YOU SON OF A....!!!! *crashes into the ground before I can reach the Ejection Handle*" :D
@peterruiz6117
@peterruiz6117 Жыл бұрын
L O L !! "I can get out and WALK faster than this !!" There should be a lever with a hand on the end, for slapping Jester mode....
@DariasKehl
@DariasKehl Жыл бұрын
Jester bails on all my best leaf-peeping.
@alexshmalex
@alexshmalex Жыл бұрын
I’ve never had Jester leave the party on his own… I must be doing something wrong
@Zach636465
@Zach636465 Жыл бұрын
@@alexshmalex It's more likely you're NOT doing something "wrong"... :)
@Ganiscol
@Ganiscol Жыл бұрын
The only thing deGrasse Tyson did not consider was the inevitable thought-terminating cliché of "It's just a movie, dude!" 😅
@SingtotheMountainStudio
@SingtotheMountainStudio Жыл бұрын
Or did he!?
@donniebrookins6215
@donniebrookins6215 Жыл бұрын
Just trying to prove hes smarter than everyone else......hes a jack wagon
@jedironin380
@jedironin380 Жыл бұрын
Neil forgot about 1 major factor that saved Maverick: Plot Armor!
@dlxmarks
@dlxmarks Жыл бұрын
People use the "it's just a movie" excuse as if they're elementary school plays and not productions that involved thousands of people and hundreds of millions of dollars to make.
@kurtpena5462
@kurtpena5462 Жыл бұрын
Either you suspend disbelief or its just lots of action and stuff blowing up.
@mattmatt516
@mattmatt516 Жыл бұрын
Scott Manley just did a response video to this as well, and he does a lot of the math that explains how survival could have been possible.
@dt9327
@dt9327 Жыл бұрын
Tyson is the one of the guy who take his math notebook out when people attempt to fly, did some calculations and said it was impossible. Then laught and move on with his day while feeling superior.
@rickoshay5525
@rickoshay5525 Жыл бұрын
And he gets immediately dismissive when people expose him for a fool.
@mechanomics2649
@mechanomics2649 Жыл бұрын
No, he wouldn't do that at all. If you're going to call someone out, you should probably address a position they hold instead of talking about ghosts.
@andyfletcher3561
@andyfletcher3561 Жыл бұрын
@@mechanomics2649 LoL, we've all watched him do it...Especially when he is deeply fantasizing he's some sort of profound philosopher.
@willrunriot
@willrunriot Жыл бұрын
@@mechanomics2649 You must have missed him saying BB8 was impossible. Only to eat crow when it was shown that they actually made it work.
@cadetsparklez3300
@cadetsparklez3300 Жыл бұрын
@@andyfletcher3561 or when talking to stephen hawking
@nickpook442
@nickpook442 Жыл бұрын
The break-up scene, showing the debris in the upper atmosphere, gave me an emotional punch, reminding me of the Shuttle Columbia accident.
@daviddura1172
@daviddura1172 Жыл бұрын
Yes…living in Dallas still remember the sonic booms and seeing the debris smear in the sky that Saturday morning
@nickpook442
@nickpook442 Жыл бұрын
@@daviddura1172 I would have given this a thumbs up, but I don’t feel that’s be appropriate. I’m from the UK, and was driving on a country road when I heard the news on the car radio. I had to stop the car for a while before I could go on.
@xaero76
@xaero76 Жыл бұрын
Yes.... and remember the shuttle was doing about 17,000 miles per hour during re-entry.... there is no escape capsule, nor any chance to bail out, they do have a option or escape system to bail out of a shuttle, but in all reality it would never be used due to such high speed....
@omenaccipio
@omenaccipio Жыл бұрын
@@daviddura1172 Wow... that's chilling. When I was 5 I was given a Shuttle toy. It was a pencil sharpener that I treasured. In Uruguay in 1984, that toy was not very common. In it's side it was this little signs: "Columbia". All my chilhood that word was synonymous to "space shuttle". Stroke me once that she was lost. Stroke me twice the loss of her crew. Stroke me again to know that with her outcome, the Space Shuttle Program came to an end.
@jayski9410
@jayski9410 Жыл бұрын
The Columbia shuttle break up is what came to my mind as well. And I used to think the poor astronauts never knew what hit them but I've since read that there is some cockpit audio that contains expletives indicating that at least one of them knew they were about to die. The saddest thing of all though is that the shuttle Atlantis was nearly ready for launch of the next mission and could have been used to rescue Columbia's crew in orbit if anyone has realized how severely their shuttle had been damaged.
@jamesrobie8065
@jamesrobie8065 Жыл бұрын
Tyson is my favorite example of a person with expertise on one area, incorrectly assuming he can pontificate in other areas. No one does it better.
@desmonddwyer
@desmonddwyer Жыл бұрын
He knows what he's talking about 🤔
@thall7368
@thall7368 Жыл бұрын
Musk might be an even better example, whether you like him or not.
@dl2one
@dl2one Жыл бұрын
Rogan is still waiting to speak
@MagnumMuscle1000
@MagnumMuscle1000 Жыл бұрын
He does it all the time. He's too smart for his own good.
@psyience3213
@psyience3213 Жыл бұрын
He’s a really smart ignoramus
@SuperEddietv
@SuperEddietv Жыл бұрын
Neil is the kind of guy that gets duct taped to the telephone poles at parties.😁
@Jagar_Tharn
@Jagar_Tharn Жыл бұрын
No, he was captain of the wrestling team, so he would be the one tying you to a telephone pole.
@SuperEddietv
@SuperEddietv Жыл бұрын
@@Jagar_Tharn BJJ, Systema and shoot fighter, vs wrestling. Yeah, ok. Take your worship elsewhere.
@MrBrock314
@MrBrock314 Жыл бұрын
@@SuperEddietv I say you'd be two old men in lockup in no time.
@SuperEddietv
@SuperEddietv Жыл бұрын
@@MrBrock314 You missed out on the 80's, I can tell. That's sad really. 🤣
@mechanomics2649
@mechanomics2649 Жыл бұрын
@@SuperEddietv Sure guy, and my friend's uncle is a janitor at Nintendo. At least you can readily admit that you're a knuckle-dragging mouth-breather though, so there's that I guess.
@SubVet84
@SubVet84 Жыл бұрын
As a former submariner, I love watching submarine movies. I used to constantly take them apart until I realized I was starting to watch them alone. Once I started to take them for what they were, I learned to keep quiet and appreciate the story being told. Then people were happy to watch with me, and then ask questions at the end about realism. If all military movies were truly realistic, it would be about 2 hours of boredom and 3 minutes of action.
@ChesapeakeWahido
@ChesapeakeWahido Жыл бұрын
Tyson is renowned for being a popular media personality with opinions on everything whether he’s qualified to weigh that opinion or not
@stacymcmahon453
@stacymcmahon453 Жыл бұрын
Yup. I like Tyson overall, but he's a dinosaur of the I-know-everything-because-I'm-famous species.
@asherwiggin6456
@asherwiggin6456 Жыл бұрын
“Missile banks” 😂
@typen3k0
@typen3k0 Жыл бұрын
Tyson has garbage takes on subjects is he a expert in. His opinion in almost all subjects are worthless. I do not like him because he does not sound like a very knowledgeable human being. He's just a click bait artist hiding behind a doctorate degree in hopes that laymen will believe every word that come out of his lying mouth.
@doyouwanttogivemelekiss3097
@doyouwanttogivemelekiss3097 Жыл бұрын
@@asherwiggin6456 well, its a battery, and iPhone juice for the twitterati is stored in power banks - it all checks out 😂😂😂 edit: meant battery bank. any way - this is about banks 😂😂
@Skank_and_Gutterboy
@Skank_and_Gutterboy Жыл бұрын
This is the same jack-off that led the "Pluto is not a planet" charge. This guy is stepping way out of his depth, I'll leave it to the aviation professionals, thanks.
@SavageTactical
@SavageTactical Жыл бұрын
The capsule was exactly what I thought as well. We have the technology today to build a capsule to survive an ejection at that speed. We aren’t close to building a Mach 10 jet with conventional takeoff and landing capability. In reality, Cruise surviving and ejection at that speed is more plausible than the jet itself.
@jameshisself9324
@jameshisself9324 Жыл бұрын
The problems with capsules are 2 major ones- 1. they add a tremendous weight penalty, potentially causing a mishap by making the plane too bloated to be able to dodge or jink it's way out of a hit. 2. If the capsule is damaged along with the plane then the crew are screwed. Best to keep the survival gear that the crew needs to leave with them as small as possible to prevent that. Additionally, there are many other flight regimes that the system must be optimized for to maximize their survival in as many different types of mishaps as possible. Unpredictability is the only thing predictable about how any given mishap will occur.
@davidsmith8997
@davidsmith8997 Жыл бұрын
Yup.
@Skank_and_Gutterboy
@Skank_and_Gutterboy Жыл бұрын
@@jameshisself9324 I disagree, the F-111 didn't seem to have this problem.
@Skank_and_Gutterboy
@Skank_and_Gutterboy Жыл бұрын
Remember, he's ejecting at a way high altitude, too. There's been at least one successful ejection from an SR-71 at Mach 3+ without a capsule, the space suit was protection enough. Mach 3+ is way fast but the at 85,000 feet the air is really thin. In that flight regime, the SR-71 is at 400 knots-indicated. The forces on the pilot's body are a function of dynamic pressure, not absolute speed. I'm not saying 100% that you could extrapolate this to Mach 10 and whatever crazy-ass altitude it would/could be at, I'm just saying that it's worth a look, an ejection in a spacesuit and no capsule MIGHT be do-able.
@zacharyradford5552
@zacharyradford5552 Жыл бұрын
I’d say the jet to each Mach 10 is closer than you think.
@knnampoothiry310
@knnampoothiry310 Жыл бұрын
Let's not confuse entertainment with science. Apart from Neil, no one cared at what speed he ejected. We just prayed our Maverick is safe, thankfully, he was. Thats what makes him Maverick. Long live !!!
@buryitdeep
@buryitdeep Жыл бұрын
Neil degassed Tyson never misses a chance to say his own name, or catch his own reflection.
@Wolf_3125
@Wolf_3125 Жыл бұрын
He's a phony and probably a communist
@seanwhitehouse2274
@seanwhitehouse2274 Жыл бұрын
Exactly, who follows this idiot?
@MegaBoeboe
@MegaBoeboe Жыл бұрын
rather him than you
@tsuhobbs
@tsuhobbs Жыл бұрын
You forgot the other bad guy pilot he shot at the end who gets finished off by his buddies missle. Slow mo shows him ejecting too.
@navalinfantry2974
@navalinfantry2974 Жыл бұрын
Yep. He (or she) does get a good ejection.
@tsuhobbs
@tsuhobbs Жыл бұрын
@@navalinfantry2974 I use “him” like coke. What kind of cokes do you have? Dr Pepper, Root beer, Pepsi, sprite. Coke doesn’t even register as a drink to me. South Texas… my relatives call them Pop, Soda, soda pop. Absolutely could’ve been a female pilot.
@MrPlaneTalk
@MrPlaneTalk Жыл бұрын
But probably not
@ninjaskeleton6140
@ninjaskeleton6140 Жыл бұрын
There’s also the flash back to the ejection scene in the first top gun movie
@bronco5334
@bronco5334 Жыл бұрын
@@MrPlaneTalk I mean, the bad guys appear to be from "not-Iran", so the chance of any of their pilots being female....
@ftorresgamez
@ftorresgamez Жыл бұрын
I went to the theater to watch this one and right after the scene where the hypersonic airplane disintegrates into pieces and then Maverick wanders into a diner, I turned my head to one side and said to my son "He's really, really, ridiculously indestructible".
@sloppydog4831
@sloppydog4831 Жыл бұрын
He's made out of Tomcruision.
@Mechaghostman2
@Mechaghostman2 Жыл бұрын
@@sloppydog4831 He has those alien force fields given to him by the scientology people.
@demonmonsterdave
@demonmonsterdave Жыл бұрын
Please don't ruin the experience for everybody by talking during a movie, and stop teaching your son bad manners.
@jaysnow4074
@jaysnow4074 Жыл бұрын
Honestly, I like the fan theory that Maverick dies in the deathstar crash and everything that happens after is a dream.
@larrystevens7410
@larrystevens7410 Жыл бұрын
Yep, steal, carbon fibre, Titanium allripped to shreds, but a body made up of more than 2/3 water remains intact and uninjured. Don't know how they do it, but I'd like to get hold of whatever it is that protects you like that. He'll, car crashes would not kill anyone if they were installed in cars.
@davidsherman7868
@davidsherman7868 Жыл бұрын
There was an F-15 pilot, whose aircraft, traveling above supersonic speed, started to disintegrate around him, causing him to punch out. His entire face was lacerated, and he ended up with broken arms and legs. But somehow, managed to survive.
@OmniMale
@OmniMale Жыл бұрын
And one of my pilots hit the water at 600 plus knots. We only found part of his helmet and flight vest.
@miguellowe2407
@miguellowe2407 Жыл бұрын
Clever Top Gun segue on that outtro... really nice! I cant get enough of these real-life pilot reviews of TGM. Awesome analysis and breakdown.
@brandynmcmahan5398
@brandynmcmahan5398 Жыл бұрын
Hey Ward, the first SU-57 that Maverick shoots down also has ejection and seat separation right before it’s hit by the missile from its wingman. It’s a split second to notice it but it’s there.
@safejewel2072
@safejewel2072 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, I caught that one and thought it was cool, maverick never killed anyone in the movie
@justjarryd
@justjarryd Жыл бұрын
I was about to mention this. There are 7 ejections.
@cerebralm
@cerebralm Жыл бұрын
Do either of the Hind pilots eject?
@Coolfooter
@Coolfooter Жыл бұрын
@@cerebralm Eject from a helicopter?
@somsokca7836
@somsokca7836 Жыл бұрын
@@cerebralm Hind do not have ejection system.
@brianwolford194
@brianwolford194 Жыл бұрын
Check out the X-15 ejection seat. It had telescoping booms to slow/stabilize until speeds were slow enough to deploy a chute. Also featured a sculpted seat with restraints, onboard oxygen, and pressure suit.
@johnp139
@johnp139 Жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@pirx9798
@pirx9798 Жыл бұрын
I'm surprised that Neil thought the Darkstar had a traditional ejection seat. The only thing visible in the movie was a lot of debris at high altitude, so I assumed the pilot capsule could be ejected as a whole.
@swigityswooty7887
@swigityswooty7887 Жыл бұрын
@@pirx9798 It’s because he’s bored. And he gets a rise out of people thinking he’s smart.
@MrBrock314
@MrBrock314 Жыл бұрын
@@swigityswooty7887 I think you missed the part where he's still likely right.
@carlosoliveira-rc2xt
@carlosoliveira-rc2xt Жыл бұрын
@@MrBrock314 You miss the part that Neil is an idiot!
@Lyonsbane75
@Lyonsbane75 Жыл бұрын
Lol, the actors actually learned to fly the jets themselves along with Navy pilots sitting as backups. Every react video I’ve seen featuring actual navy pilots state the scenes and action are all possible and realistic 😊
@Wolf_3125
@Wolf_3125 Жыл бұрын
Exactly. Neil is a phony and an egomaniac.
@bailey-bobthorton1950
@bailey-bobthorton1950 Жыл бұрын
For those who are interested in what happens to someone is exposed to hypersonic flow, research the space shuttle Columbia. They found pieces of the crew in a debris field miles long. It doesn't go well.
@walterscientist
@walterscientist Жыл бұрын
If you examine Darkstar as it rolls out of the hangar you can see there is a noticeable straight groove going all the way from left to right behind the cockpit. It seems the front of the plane with the cockpit is shaped as a hypersonic glide vehicle that could detach from the main fuselage in an emergency. I heard the creators of Darkstar design put a decent amount of effort into the design and this would kinda make sense. The movie was shot in a way that implied Maverick ejected on a regular seat (his suit was scorched), but we never saw how he descended or landed. I think possibly it was done on purpose to make Maverick look really cool, while not being totally unrealistic. - He ejected and landed in an escape pod, it just wasn't shown.
@alphonsotate2982
@alphonsotate2982 Жыл бұрын
HA HA HA really that is why I do not go to MODEREN Holy Wood MILITARY MOVIES after being in the military.
@anristellariza9036
@anristellariza9036 Жыл бұрын
@@alphonsotate2982 Cause you can't separate entertainment from reality? Wow you're fun at parties
@KarnivorActual
@KarnivorActual Жыл бұрын
@@alphonsotate2982 cringe
@davidsimmons7359
@davidsimmons7359 Жыл бұрын
Good eye. Excellent attention to detail.
@swigityswooty7887
@swigityswooty7887 Жыл бұрын
It was an escape pod 100%. Lockheed Martin literally had a hand in this movie.
@bitcores
@bitcores Жыл бұрын
It's good to remember that Neil's tweets are often just physicist shower thoughts.
@raul0ca
@raul0ca Жыл бұрын
I'm glad I'm not a female physicist
@klc758
@klc758 Жыл бұрын
He’s not a real scientist just an actor
@shonuff4323
@shonuff4323 Жыл бұрын
It's not even that. They are not his own thoughts. He just copies and pastes science facts and tries to push them off as his own findings and sadly there are a ton of idiots out there that believe it is all him and think he is smart. The guy has zero accomplishments in his field. The media needed a non-white science guy and he won the job. There is absolutely nothing special about the guy.
@JohnS-il1dr
@JohnS-il1dr Жыл бұрын
@@klc758 he's in the same class as Bill Nye the Science Guy
@mattbrody3565
@mattbrody3565 Жыл бұрын
@@klc758 actually, he does have a PhD in astrophysics based on a paper he wrote analyzing star density around the center of our galaxy. To be fair, his celebrity role is indeed more successful than his physics one. As for GM's reply, Nye is an aerospace engineer by trade.
@JinKee
@JinKee Жыл бұрын
Peter Siebold survived his space ship breaking up at 10km altitude when he was a test pilot for Virgin Galactic. his copilot could not achieve seat separation, sadly.
@pbsing
@pbsing Жыл бұрын
There are 7 ejections, the pilot in the first SU57 that Maverick shot at first and then used as a shield actually ejected as the plane was exploding by a missile from the second SU57. The scene happens fast but you can see it, if you look for it.
@Pearley1961
@Pearley1961 Жыл бұрын
Actually there are nine ejections. Maverick from the Darkstar. Phoenix from the two seat F-18 Bob from the two seat F-18 Bad guy pilot from the Fifth Gen Fighter Second bad guy pilot from the Fifth Gen Fighter (look close) Maverick from the single seat F18 Rooster from the single seat F18 Plus… Goose and Maverick from footage shot for the first movie. That’s also in here. That’s nine.
@ntoepfer01
@ntoepfer01 Жыл бұрын
Yep, if you look close, both Su-57 pilots eject (you can just see this before the 1st one is destroyed by the missile) This is one of the more realistic depictions of air combat shown on film, let's not drag it down with assumptions about a non-existent hypersonic aircraft's (sorry China, not a real plane) theoretical lack of capabilities to help the pilot survive! :)
@rsrt6910
@rsrt6910 Жыл бұрын
You know what's weird is if you assume Maverick actually does die with the Darkstar and assume the rest of the movie takes place in purgatory, the movie still works!
@stacymcmahon453
@stacymcmahon453 Жыл бұрын
That's my theory. The whole thing is like a rehearsal of his life before and after the first film, and the run on the target is so much like the death star attack. It's hard to suspend disbelief if it's supposed to be real, but makes perfect sense as his dying thoughts/dreams.
@rsrt6910
@rsrt6910 Жыл бұрын
@@stacymcmahon453 The dialogue makes me think he's already dead from the Darkstar incident, but that he has "unfinished business" before he can move on. For instance, all the other pilots are dead. They died because the raid was performed without Maverick, at 400' and 400 knots, Hangman is the only one that makes it to the target because he charged in and left Rooster and everyone else behind to get picked off by the SU-57's but he missed the target without a wingman to guide his bombs and got picked off by the SAMs because he didn't have backup. Penny and her daughter died in a tragic boating accident years ago leaving Maverick alone with no one to "mourn him when he finally burns in". So flying is literally all he has when he gets the word that the only thing in his life that has meaning will be taken away from him. So now he knows his life is over, but he has an opportunity to end it for a good cause. So when he reaches Mach 10, he pushes it farther partly because he's Maverick, but also because his life is over anyway so why not end it on a high note. Iceman is LITERALLY being a "guardian angel" to help Mav and the others finish their business and once Mav is setup on the path to redemption, he earns his wings and moves on. Leaving Hondo and Warlock also as literal guardian angels who's job it is point out to Maverick when he's straying from the path to redemption "I don't like that look Mav" is his angel reminding him that suicide is a sin, but otherwise not interfering with his choices. But Maverick pulls through, makes the right decisions. along with the younger pilots that died in the ill fated raid, and they all "earn their wings" in the end and fly into the sunset. Sort of like a "It's a Wonderful Life" but with fighter jets.
@SingaporeSkaterSam
@SingaporeSkaterSam Жыл бұрын
Indeed. I got tired of posting similar (few want to hear it), but glad the idea has traction.
@michaelmichaelagnew8503
@michaelmichaelagnew8503 Жыл бұрын
I like this answer best, they say your life flashes before your eyes when you die. Well no one really knows who is still alive. But maybe this two hour movie is what went through his head as he was dying.
@DVX755
@DVX755 Жыл бұрын
I was more so surprised at the fact that Maverick could always sneak up to the other pilots in flight and be right under them, then turn his plane upside down and place himself ABOVE his other pilot!
@DJaquithFL
@DJaquithFL Жыл бұрын
My first thought was there was an ejection pod so the pilot doesn't go splat? So let's have a movie where it's 100% realism with 0% buying tickets.
@thecollinzboy
@thecollinzboy Жыл бұрын
Elevation at which the pilot ejects plays a big factor in survivability. The higher the altitude the more favorable the outcome. Maverick was at a very high elevation when he ejected means he had much less air density going against him which would be lighter on his pod/body and it was never stated how long maverick waited to eject after the failure
@14goldmedals
@14goldmedals Жыл бұрын
You make an excellent point. At the altitude these SR series of jets operate the air density is very thin. Fewer molecules to collide with means less friction which means way lower heat.
@dougrobinson8602
@dougrobinson8602 Жыл бұрын
True. The fact that Felix Baumgartner went supersonic after jumping from a balloon at 128,000 feet proves how few air molecules are getting in your way at extreme altitudes. Rate of deceleration would be very low. Temperatures would also be insanely low, which would help prevent the pilot's pressure suit from burning up. Not to mention the lack of oxygen. Neil DeGrasse Tyson is an ego trip on steroids. Just watch any interview with him.
@davidsuzukiispolpot
@davidsuzukiispolpot Жыл бұрын
​@@14goldmedals You make a great point about the air density but technically similar heat since the kinetic energy will convert to heat, but you are correct because it would happen over a much longer time due to the low air density so the temperature will be much lower.
@Randy_King77
@Randy_King77 Жыл бұрын
I have a off topic question relating to air density and comments in this post. How can a pressurized system exist side by side to a vacuum.. and I think rotation adds to the sum of the equation..
@johnp139
@johnp139 Жыл бұрын
@@davidsuzukiispolpot Actually he would be severely burnt due to aerodynamic heating.
@TheBillhelm
@TheBillhelm Жыл бұрын
When you said it was going to be a trick question I was thinking you were going to include Maverick being ejected from The Hard Deck.
@Bolt_theG35
@Bolt_theG35 Жыл бұрын
7 ejections. If you look closely the pilot in the first SU57 Maverick shot ejected just before it got hit with the friendly fire when Maverick evaded the missile.
@mikestanmore2614
@mikestanmore2614 Жыл бұрын
Many years ago, I heard the story of a Mirage pilot who ejected during what he thought was a spin, but which was in fact a spiral dive. He ejected as the aircraft went supersonic. He apparently broke almost every bone in his body, but he survived. He returned to England, and was killed by a bus.
@mikerosoft1009
@mikerosoft1009 Жыл бұрын
Proof that if you eject at a supersonic speed you get hit by a bus.
@alfredhernandez9799
@alfredhernandez9799 Жыл бұрын
Bah-dumb-bum!!
@michaeldenesyk3195
@michaeldenesyk3195 Жыл бұрын
You know what, North American designed an ejection seat that was designed to eject a pilot at Mach 3 plus. The secret with the X-15 seat was that it had a waveform generator that would create a zone of decreased Q, but also, the Pilot would be protected with a pressure suit. North American did assess that a pilot would have some burns, but not fatal.
@michaeldenesyk3195
@michaeldenesyk3195 Жыл бұрын
In my excitement to respond with this post, I made an error in describing the aerodynamic device fitted to the front of the seat structure. It was more of a Shock cone that would create the aerodynamics to divert the supersonic Windstream from the pilot. It isn't a wave form generator.
@X-RPBishop
@X-RPBishop Жыл бұрын
Watching it, I assumed there was a titanium cockpit that separated from the fuselage. I believe the F-111 and the B1 are both designed that way. As an engineer, I would have designed it that way.
@moviesgalore9947
@moviesgalore9947 Жыл бұрын
Correct you and me are the only smart people on here - the entire cockpit ejects from the plane so Maverick is safe inside the cockpit which floats down to earth same way a space capsule floats down to earth with 3 parachutes. Anyone who thinks Mav ejected the way a fighter pilot would eject is too stupid to be taken seriously. The Entire Cockpit Section Ejects from the Plane with Mav sealed safe inside it.
@Non-dual-mind1
@Non-dual-mind1 Жыл бұрын
Let's also not forget the SR71 was made from heat-dissipating materials due to air friction over multiples of mach speeds. Ejecting at mach 10.5 would instantly BOIL him in his suit. He'd be a crispy critter.
@dr-stephennewdell3882
@dr-stephennewdell3882 Жыл бұрын
Maverick is a mythical man who can get a promotion, won't retire and despite his best efforts, refuses to Die. He also has a long standing argument with Goose's son, Rooster, who never seems to read the report about what happened and blames Mav for an accident. It's fantasy with some fabulous flying action. That's why people go to movies. They suspend reality for a while. Someone wrote a few years ago, "There are Old Pilots and there are Bold Pilots. There are no old, bold pilots." Maybe Maverick is the first of the old-bold ones.
@frigglefragglewaggit6923
@frigglefragglewaggit6923 Жыл бұрын
Maybe I need to watch it again, but I could swear Rooster's issue with Maverick was that Mav pulled Rooster's papers and "set his career back 4 years", not because of the Mav/Goose incident in TG.
@anirbankar2840
@anirbankar2840 Жыл бұрын
@@frigglefragglewaggit6923 Was about to say the same.
@fullmoonprepping4024
@fullmoonprepping4024 Жыл бұрын
@@frigglefragglewaggit6923 It was both . . . . Rooster did bring up that his dad believed in Maverick and he himself wouldn't make that same mistake, but he was mostly pissed thatMav pulled his papers. That WAS his primary beef.
@EricCoop
@EricCoop Жыл бұрын
The B-58 also had escape pods. The F-111 and B-1 have the entire cockpit as a pod. The ejection seats on the B-58 and XB-70 were nearly identical and would ecapsulate the crew members.
@hoghogwild
@hoghogwild Жыл бұрын
Would encapsulate the crew members individually and could still fly the jet with the pod closed, but still in the plane.(in the case of a decompression of the crew compartment.
@TJAkin
@TJAkin Жыл бұрын
B-1A was a crew pod design. That didn’t work too well during an aft CG test flight at Edwards AFB when the aircraft departed and the crew separated via the pod. It was all good until impact with the ground at just the wrong swing rate, killing one of the crew. When President Reagan resurrected the program, the B-1B was redesigned to have individual seats among many other changes. Extra crewmen could also bail out the bottom crew entrance.
@hoghogwild
@hoghogwild Жыл бұрын
@@TJAkin The B1A was to use 4 separate seats just like the B1B. The 4th B1A prototype was built using the 4 seats as the capsule design, similar to the F-111 was dropped. The B1A that crashed had a parachute riser malfunction causing the right front corner to hit first instead of the squarely onto the airbags causing the pilots seat to break a 40g rated bolt.
@LRRPFco52
@LRRPFco52 Жыл бұрын
F-111 had the capsule. B-1A had the capsule. B-1B has individual seats. We were on B-1B CTF still using modified B-1As in the early 1980s, when a departure from controlled flight happened at low level, and the crew initiated the capsule separation sequence. Chief Test Pilot for Rockwell, Doug Benefield, was killed on-impact when the capsule landed, due to him not having full restraints on in his seat. That was in 1984 before the first production B-1B had even rolled-out. I was there for the roll-out ceremony as well at Plant 42. F-111Es were used as chase planes for the low level test flights on the B-1B CTF. F-106As and at least two F-106Bs were also used as chase planes on B-1B CTF. They had really large, hi-vis flash paint jobs on their vertical stabs with B-1 planform logos and the word “CHASE” at the base of the triangular art.
@hoghogwild
@hoghogwild Жыл бұрын
@@LRRPFco52 We've had this discussion before. The first 3 B1A's had the capsule, the 4th and last B1A had 4 ejection seats(just like all B1Bs did), as would any future B1A's had the went into production.
@chrisbullard5901
@chrisbullard5901 Жыл бұрын
Tyson is proposing a high school AP Physics “get the kids’ attention” problem, not actually thinking it through as an engineer. The “escape pod” concept is what I’d lean on, too. A drogue chute or streamer to add just enough resistance to slow things down without tearing itself apart or adding unnecessary weight (think all those smaller Estes model rockets you built as a kid) would make sense.
@MrBrock314
@MrBrock314 Жыл бұрын
Perhaps it's on purpose to make people think....
@mechanomics2649
@mechanomics2649 Жыл бұрын
Or, he's just trying to use the moment to educate and people are getting bent out of shape over nothing.
@aerospacematt9147
@aerospacematt9147 Жыл бұрын
@Chris Bullard Yes. I’d theorize that there were some deployable fins that come out after cockpit separation. Those are necessary to bring the Center of Pressure back enough behind the pod’s Center of Gravity for it to be stable. Perhaps a parachute was used as well, just to slow it enough for Mav to actually eject safely.
@inconnu4961
@inconnu4961 Жыл бұрын
@@mechanomics2649 We are not getting any more bent out of shape than you and other cone heads are! We think Neil Tyson is a tool! its very simple!
@iuh4teducking870
@iuh4teducking870 Жыл бұрын
I enjoy listening to Tyson geek out on the actualities of the portrayed uses of science and their faults in movies. The man really enjoys his work
@garyhawkins8094
@garyhawkins8094 Жыл бұрын
...and the sound of his own voice...
@neurofiedyamato8763
@neurofiedyamato8763 Жыл бұрын
Apparently a lot of people hate him here because he pointed out the low chance of survival in their favorite movie. It's not a big deal and Neil never said he didn't enjoy it or that it was a big deal. I personally love analyzing fiction for inaccuracies or just something that could have been done more logically. It's a fun thing to do and doesn't mean the story was bad or the movie sucks as a result.
@hoss6048
@hoss6048 Жыл бұрын
A friend, the late Oscar Sepp, was an escape pod engineer. He dealt with the parachute part of it. He wrote a book “There Were No Free Lunches”…he worked on the SR As well I believe.
@boxbuster1000
@boxbuster1000 Жыл бұрын
Ok, let me get this straight... He's complaining about a fictional aircraft in a fictional movie that can do fictional speeds, with fictional maneuvers and supposedly did a fictional pilot ejection that we don't know how it was achieved ( ie. Maybe it's a fictional capsule that ejects him and he's contained.) And this is what he's worried about? Really? He wants die on this hill about this fictional part of the fictional movie? Hope he doesn't tell kids that Santa can't really deliver their presents by reindeer, in a sled, from the north pole because its not possible to fly that fast by reindeer in one night. Ok. Got it. I can sleep now Neil.
@MrBrock314
@MrBrock314 Жыл бұрын
Pretty sure he has addressed how Santa could or could not do that. To scientists, everything is worth picking apart. :)
@mattalford3932
@mattalford3932 Жыл бұрын
The speed isn't fictional.
@mechanomics2649
@mechanomics2649 Жыл бұрын
Where did he complain? Are you so fragile that you can't stand someone taking something happening in a movie as an opportunity to educate?
@plmokm33
@plmokm33 Жыл бұрын
I'm reminded of the time someone asked him when we'll have flying cars and he was like "we already do, they're called helicopters". Yea why don't you park one on your driveway/garage if they're the same thing? Or is it that what people mean by "flying car" is a flying vehicle the size and shape of a car? Half the stuff he chooses to comment on these days makes me roll my eyes.
@jaredsterenchock219
@jaredsterenchock219 Жыл бұрын
I love the fact that you brought up his tweet on why they didn't take out the air-to-air missile Banks first which is exactly what they had talked about in the movie that they wanted to go undetected you take out one missile Bank and then you've just launched a barrage of aircraft and or enemy presence on your tails immediately. Love this channel love everything you do Mooch. Absolutely my favorite KZfaq channel ever. Keep up the great work
@antisoda
@antisoda Жыл бұрын
Though, a choreographed spoiling attack at the airfield and missile batteries at the point where the aircraft are doing their canyon run would probably alleviate the SAM threat and draw away any lingering aircraft. When the airfield gets hit by the cruise missiles, the cat's out of the bag anyway. Why not add some HARMs to the fray?
@ruiliu4157
@ruiliu4157 Жыл бұрын
@@antisoda You clearly don’t remember the SAMs on the ridge line around the crater. You can hardly bombard them without generating debris to affect the target down below.
@WhatIsSanity
@WhatIsSanity Жыл бұрын
I didn't even watch the movie and I immediately knew Neil wasn't making any sense. It's in the movie synopsis that the whole operation hinges on stealth.
@m.childinflorence1760
@m.childinflorence1760 Жыл бұрын
Tyson always says he’s a terrible person to take to the movies! Great rebuttal. I bet Neil would appreciate it.
@chrisgeddes26
@chrisgeddes26 Жыл бұрын
Ward, Mr Carroll, I have heard that some airplanes had an automatic ejection system like the automatic system that would pull the Apollo command module off if a certain circuit broke. I am refencing something I read (a long time ago) about a F4 sliding off a runway and upon hitting a ditch automatically ejecting the crew. Is this true, does or has such a system exist? Thank you for your channel. Liked.
@bryanribey
@bryanribey Жыл бұрын
The first SU-57 pilot can also ben seen ejecting before Maverick uses that SU-57 to catch the missile fired by the other SU-57. So the number of ejections is actually 7.
@lionheartx-ray4135
@lionheartx-ray4135 Жыл бұрын
I figured the Aircraft had an ejection system similar too the F-111. Where it was a capsule rather then the person ejection. It hard too imagine they expect a person too eject out of aircraft with no protection.
@mccallsensei3293
@mccallsensei3293 Жыл бұрын
"It's just a movie" LMFAO that's what I was thinking. Good one Neil for stating the bloody obvious, couldn't have done it without you!
@MrBrock314
@MrBrock314 Жыл бұрын
You'd think it's obvious but there are a lot of people missing some basic understanding of physics. That is NDT's mission - to educated people about science and to raise awareness.
@Freediver_72
@Freediver_72 Жыл бұрын
I was at Tyndall when that F15 pilot ejected off Pensacola. Remarkable recovery story. I bought a VHS copy of the Dateline story.
@hankscorner9631
@hankscorner9631 Жыл бұрын
Ward you missed at least 2 ejections from the 5th gen aircraft that were shot down right after the F14 took off
@skyyfiman
@skyyfiman Жыл бұрын
yup. the first 5th gen fighter Maverick sucker punches with his guns, does eject. so, Ward Carroll missed that ejection. if you slow it down you can see the pilot eject right after the first smoke in the air part
@epollinger1
@epollinger1 Жыл бұрын
@@skyyfiman He also missed the flashback to Maverick and Goose ejecting in the first movie.
@sonicfrog1
@sonicfrog1 Жыл бұрын
You know, before we start picking apart the technical details in these new works of fiction, I believe we need to address the elephant in the room still with Cinderella(1950) and those glass slippers, one of which was easily smashed to bits due to the stepmother's contempt, however Cindy danced up to the stroke of midnight and ran across cobblestones without breaking them... not even so much as a crack? Just sayin'.
@cerebralm
@cerebralm Жыл бұрын
Clearly they were made of transparent aluminum, not glass, and the stepmother must have used slight-of-hand to expose the slipper to gallium before it broke. Obviously. I mean, that's just science.
@VladimirMarkovic
@VladimirMarkovic Жыл бұрын
Just a question, wasn't there a limit of seat ejections one can take from the aircraft. As I recall it was 2 and then you are off to desk duty.
@michaelmichaelagnew8503
@michaelmichaelagnew8503 Жыл бұрын
Yes this is correct, it's like this in the Air Force and I'm sure its no different in the Navy.
@tomg9376
@tomg9376 Жыл бұрын
Just watched your video on the Top Gun Maverick ejections. Great video, but there was actually seven ejections. The first SU57 shot down had an ejection that was easy to miss. I watched it eight times in the theatre, so you could say I'm a big fan.
@EdwardRLyons
@EdwardRLyons Жыл бұрын
As an addendum, it would be worth looking at the X-15 ejection seat and pressure suit combination. They were intended to allow a pilot to eject at Mach 5+ and high altitude. Never used in flight, though, and probably would not have saved Michael Adams in the high altitude breakup of his X-15 in 1967.
@doyouwanttogivemelekiss3097
@doyouwanttogivemelekiss3097 Жыл бұрын
so much this. because there is a difference between mach 3 and mach 10 - thus the blackbird mishap is not applicable to the maverick scene, IMO. As kinetic energy goes with the square of velocity, the difference in energy could be a factor of 10. By contrast, the x-15 is at least much, much closer to the maverick speeds. Of course there are other factors such as air density. And I would suspect that low air density at 78k (?) is what allowed the sr-71 mishap to be survivable in the first place - so who knows, maybe maverick flew as high as snoop dogg ...
@doyouwanttogivemelekiss3097
@doyouwanttogivemelekiss3097 Жыл бұрын
btw. upon further consideration: I think altitude was left out of the scene deliberately. I suspect it makes a huge difference for survival - whether Mav disintegrated/ejected at 100k ft (dead) or 150 k ft (perhaps similar to the blackbird). This suspicion is solely based on the drag force based on air density - neglecting anything else.
@WhiskyCardinalWes
@WhiskyCardinalWes Жыл бұрын
From a real world mission planning aspect, TG:M is horribly, horribly inaccurate. There were three ways to accomplish the mission without the Star Wars canyon run. One is to target the SAM sites and missile them to death (they are known, unmoving targets that mission planners love to expend missiles on). Second is a SEAD mission with Growlers. The third option is the one I would have chosen is a blend of the first two options. Missile the static targets, SEAD package rolls in behind and takes out what the missile package missed. Tom crusies in with his band of heros and drops the bomb down the Exhaust Port saving the galaxy! But its a Tom Cruz movie so I sat in my seat, ate my popcorn and cheered like I was suppose to!!
@EvoraGT430
@EvoraGT430 Жыл бұрын
Another option would be a B-2 strike.
@shraka
@shraka Жыл бұрын
The problem is America is the largest most high tech military in the world, so they have so many options. If it were a smaller country that was out-matched and needed the element of surprise a canyon run might make sense. Can't send in SEAD because opponent has Air Sup and our protagonists don't have enough SEAD. Can't just hit the missile batteries because not enough intel + missiles to reliably get them all (plus yeah, maybe mobile SAM sites). Can't just DFA because don't have good enough bombers to overwhelm enemy air sup.
@gcm747
@gcm747 Жыл бұрын
Me think you overthunk it.
@DragNetJoe
@DragNetJoe Жыл бұрын
The mission was required for the plot, that is all. The giveaway was how GPS jammers negated our stealth F-35s. ????? That was the "ok, whatever, they just need the spectacular low level ingress".
@ruturajshiralkar5566
@ruturajshiralkar5566 Жыл бұрын
They could've got the Air Force on board. A Combined Fleet of F-16s & F-18s along with a B-2 would be a deadly combo.
@matts719
@matts719 Жыл бұрын
I’m sure it’s already been said on here, but any plane engineered to go this fast would also be engineered with some sort of pod ejection system. The structure Maverick ejects in would handle the forces just fine, and it’s perfectly plausible he’d be more than alive enough to startle friendly folks in a rural diner.
@jonathandebona8934
@jonathandebona8934 Жыл бұрын
The problem with that logic is the plane was built to survive those forces too...
@matts719
@matts719 Жыл бұрын
@@jonathandebona8934 Seems like that's less a problem and more a reason for agreeing with my logic. If one of the most highly engineered pieces of machinery known to modern civilized man can be pushed to those heat tolerances and forces, than it's kind of silly for a man as intelligent as Neil DeGrasse Tyson to presume such minds wouldn't have accounted for any reasonable eventuality with the ejection system. If there's any, "Hollywooding up" in that scene, it's that even a cavalier castonia's laden, "stick jockey" such as Maverick would not have pushed the airframe past the limit like that. No amount of engineering (whether it be the airframe, heat shielding, or ejection system) would have a reasonable chance of being effective if he pushed it that far. He'd have been as dead as Dillinger! And it wouldn't have been because of the ejection scenario. Wouldn't it have been funny if they showed him having to answer for that stunt and all the money in that jet that went up like a campfire marshmallow. They would have bounced his ass far beyond the cargo plane flying rubber dogshit out of Hong Kong scenario suggested to him in the first movie. Ha.
@fredferd965
@fredferd965 Жыл бұрын
When test pilot George Welch was flying an early F-100 in 1954, the aircraft completely broke up in flight. The machine had the early small tail, and though he had been warned, George was testing at the edge of the envelope - I forget the details. When the plane departed, he died instantly. Maybe an escape capsule would work, but those have had a mixed history.
@Oel54
@Oel54 Жыл бұрын
Maverick died when the Darkstar he was flying broke apart at Mack 10+ the whole movie is what Maverick saw before his eyes at the moment of his death, it was his final thought.
@dalemartell8639
@dalemartell8639 Жыл бұрын
Goose also shows up as an Obi Wan ghost to guide Maverick through the Canyon. Use the force Mav!
@buddystewart2020
@buddystewart2020 Жыл бұрын
Eru Ilúvatar was well pleased with the work he had done and sent him back with increased ability to use his power.
@williampulley
@williampulley Жыл бұрын
I like this theory. Thumbs up.
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 Жыл бұрын
The Supersonic B-58 Hustler had an ejection pod system. The pilot seats would each pull back into their own pod and a clamshell would drop down in front. Encapsulating the pilot during ejection. They famously tested it by launching live bears.
@FarSeeker8
@FarSeeker8 Жыл бұрын
You beat me to that fact.
@RastaJew
@RastaJew Жыл бұрын
This is an amazing fact and I can't believe I never heard it before.
@nik07nik
@nik07nik Жыл бұрын
Googling now, thanks
@nvignesh
@nvignesh Жыл бұрын
It is very much possible that skunkworks have done the math and told the filmmakers to film it in a certain way without giving away too much info in the name of National Security. The movie has their name on it so i wouldnt outright deny that there is no next gen safety system developed for darkstar
@neurofiedyamato8763
@neurofiedyamato8763 Жыл бұрын
Its at best a concept design. There is no technical data on the plane needed to be censored in the name of national security. Including the ejection system. Skunkworks most definitely didn't do any path and design a ejection system for the plane. At best they took a pod design, did some number crunching and said "it's possible" and left it at that. How is the pod designed? what are the odds and under what conditions? probably not even they know.
@guss1470
@guss1470 4 ай бұрын
I always thought the pod was the answer, the whole cockpit was ejected and later seperated when it was slow enough for the pilot to survive. A small parachute for the pod to slow down and a full parachute for the pilot later.
@neilmurgatroyd3197
@neilmurgatroyd3197 Жыл бұрын
Maverick also gets ejected from the bar...
@ronaryel6445
@ronaryel6445 Жыл бұрын
Very nice episode! Your points about ejection survival are well taken. I note however, that when I read up on SR-71 ejection, I read that Air Force trainers told the crews that ejecting at Mach3 would feel like getting hit with a 2 by 4. In other words, you can survive it, but you are going to get hurt, and it will be worse than just bumps and bruises.
@Prich319
@Prich319 Жыл бұрын
Main reason why the XB-70 Valkyrie had ejection seats that fully enclosed their crew in a shuttered capsule before firing, They could also enclose the crew if cabin pressure was lost, but the plane could still be controlled.
@stoneyll
@stoneyll Жыл бұрын
Remember folks, It's only a movie~!
@joemulatto19
@joemulatto19 Жыл бұрын
As a commercial aviation mechanic/pilot I've come to appreciate the movie Airplane.. I never understood and appreciate it till I actually got into aviation. Remember, it's just a movie, pure entertainment and nothing more. If I want real, I will go fly an airplane myself, read a book or watch a documentary.
@simondan3828
@simondan3828 Жыл бұрын
NDT already annoyed many by ridiculing UFOs while US Navy says they actually create a flight safety hazard. So not a big surprise he tells us that Wile E. Coyote can't catch the Roadrunner in real life.
@dcannon1
@dcannon1 Жыл бұрын
For a cruise altitude of 100,000 ft and Mach 10 the KEAS is under 700 kts.
@matman7691
@matman7691 Жыл бұрын
I find it hard to argue with an astro physicist or a retired military pilot on any given day so, I'm just gonna drink my beer and say thanks for the video. 07
@Kintizen
@Kintizen Жыл бұрын
15yrs or so Popular Engineering Magazine had an Air Force and NASA article, of a 15gs Plane. They had details of how it would look and safety features. The cockpit was a pressurized pod. It would have the capability to leave orbit. The cockpit pod, had the capability to enter orbit from space. Making sure a 99% survival rating for ejection in or out of orbit.
@skypixelations5757
@skypixelations5757 Жыл бұрын
there was actually another ejection you missed. The first SU57 that was shot down and then finished with the enemies missile did get an ejection. You could only see it in like 3 frames but someone watched it slowly and caught the ejection
@saintmobius5348
@saintmobius5348 Жыл бұрын
From his tweets it looked like he didn’t take into account the air density at 100k feet as displayed on the instrument panel; or the case study of the SR71 pilot that survived an inflight breakup at Mach 3 at 78k feet and walked away from it. I could be wrong though.
@chickennugg3847
@chickennugg3847 Жыл бұрын
Yes but this is also Mach 10 not Mach 3
@saintmobius5348
@saintmobius5348 Жыл бұрын
@@chickennugg3847 yes but the air density difference over the 20k+ feet between 78k feet and 100k feet, especially at the top of the Karman Line is incredibly low.
@chickennugg3847
@chickennugg3847 Жыл бұрын
@@saintmobius5348 ok fair but here’s my thought of it as someone who only has minor knowledge of air density at altitude. The SR71 pilot had his co pilot disintegrated and his oxygen hose was holding on by literally a thread, while moving at around 3.2 times the speed yeah the air density is a lot less but is it more than 3 times less? I don’t think so at least in my mind.
@DarkStarX
@DarkStarX Жыл бұрын
Yeah, but he’s pretty dense.
@saintmobius5348
@saintmobius5348 Жыл бұрын
@@chickennugg3847 The difference in pressure is 4 Kpa to close to 0Kpa, or some atmospheric pressure to nothing. That’s a sizeable drop in pressure, and could allow someone ejecting at 100k feet to slow down gradually rather than hitting a brick wall.
@LordMondegrene
@LordMondegrene Жыл бұрын
Unless this was a children's movie, or a fantasy, the laws of physics should apply.
@pvlapa
@pvlapa Жыл бұрын
When I saw that part, I imagined it would have like an ejection pod like a protective "egg" like they do in the cockpit of an F1 car.
@maartentoors
@maartentoors Жыл бұрын
Captain Brian Udell's story is bone-chilling. Great reference!
@duncanchestnut5583
@duncanchestnut5583 Жыл бұрын
From a physics perspective: Mach 10 at 100ft vs 100,000ft is a VERY different speed and air density problem. The crew on the ISS are going crazy fast and they could "eject" by jumping out into space just fine, for them the threat would be re-entry not ejection. Also, as you mentioned deceleration doesn't happen instantaneously. From a movie magic perspective: The aircraft could have been designed with an "ejection pod" meant to separate from the vehicle and withstand high altitude/high mach ejections. Moral of the story, there are too many "unknown factors" to say that it is or isn't possible. In some cases it would be survivable, in others it wouldn't.
@Nghilifa
@Nghilifa Жыл бұрын
Even at 100.000 ft it'd be instantaneously fatal. You say the heat friction on the metal parts of the plane, so if he ejected with a seat, that same friction would burn through his suit, visor, thus compromising the pressure integrity of his suit and kill him. He'd also obviously receive major 3rd degree burns as well. The only way Mav survives is if the Darkstar had an ejection pod.
@MrBrock314
@MrBrock314 Жыл бұрын
@@Nghilifa At 10x that it's certainly not fatal, but depends how much air is still left at 100, 000 feet. At 1 million, it's perfectly survivable as there's not enough air to matter.
@MrBrock314
@MrBrock314 Жыл бұрын
So you're saying NDT is half right.
@NCpilot79
@NCpilot79 Жыл бұрын
Even if the Dark Star cockpit wouldn’t separate like that of the B-1 or the F-111, there are other alternatives. The B-58 Hustler had separate ejection seats for the crew of 3. They had a rigid hood that enclosed around the pilot to form a protective shield, for high speed ejection.
@neurofiedyamato8763
@neurofiedyamato8763 Жыл бұрын
Possible and could save the crew's life but a shield/hood would not be enough at hypersonic speeds and I reckon the chance of survival is not high enough. Well IDK i the military have lower requirements at high speeds, but if they want a decent chance, pods is the only solution that I would imagine is acceptable
@DeereX748
@DeereX748 Жыл бұрын
Ward, don't forget the "clamshell" ejection seats of the B-58 Hustler in addition to the others you mention.
@Crunch104
@Crunch104 Жыл бұрын
It's just a movie! There, I thought I would do my part:) Tom's hair was messy! Call 911!
@tolson57
@tolson57 Жыл бұрын
Ward, the B-58 Hustler also had a pod ejection system that saw a lot of use.
@Nomad416
@Nomad416 Жыл бұрын
The ejection capsule idea was exactly what I was thinking while you were reading Tyson's tweets.
@byronbailey9229
@byronbailey9229 Жыл бұрын
Bow Yangs Ward. My Mirage 111O wingman ejected at 360 kts at 8000 feet unharmed due Martin Baker. I was sitting on his wingtip - very spectacular. We were 480kts in the weeds when he got a fire waring light. Came to idle pulled up then got afterburner fire warning light and control jerking then about 100 feet of flame shot out the back from where the high pressure fuel line had suddenly burnt through. I circled him as he descended in his chute and vectored in the rescue chopper.
@manythingslefttobuild
@manythingslefttobuild Жыл бұрын
Great video Ward Carrol. I chose to hold back on replying to the one of Dr. Tyson's tweets I saw. The XB-70 having pod ejection did occur to me as well as the Darkstar breaking aft of the cockpit, (like the space shuttle Challenger) slowing down, falling to 15,000 ft and then ejecting the pilot. I thought the scene had some parallels to Chuck Yeager's F-104 high altitude flat spin and subsequent crash.
@Wolf_3125
@Wolf_3125 Жыл бұрын
He's not a real Dr.
@wompa70
@wompa70 Жыл бұрын
The general public would complain that the pilot ejected without pulling the handle.
@wilson2455
@wilson2455 9 ай бұрын
read an article where a pilot ejected at Mach 0.9. x2 dislocated shoulders/elbows/ankles, flight suit ripped off, multiple internal injuries including punctured lung, broken ribs, lacerated liver, severe concussion, etc., etc. Didn't say anything about his hair !!
@djpuggs7287
@djpuggs7287 Жыл бұрын
Fun fact, if you watch the movie slow enough you’ll realize there is 7 ejections, because the first SU-57 pilot ejects as well
@johnp139
@johnp139 Жыл бұрын
Actually, the biggest concerns at that speed is the aerodynamic heating, which would melt the pressure suit. The Russians tested their K-36RB ejection seat (designed for Buran) at Mach 4.3, and they started seeing thermal failures, which would be much worse at over twice that Mach number. The other aspect is the lack of aerodynamic stability at the altitudes where the aircraft would need to be flying (>100,000 ft), which means that the escape system would need some kind of Reaction Control System in order to remain stable.
@Jon.......
@Jon....... Жыл бұрын
How did the G-Profile when they dove to the valley bottom, released bombs then climbed to the ridgeline compare to real life? I found it odd that Maverick reached max G at the ridgeline rather than when converting from 45d nose down to 45d nose up after bomb release.
@shraka
@shraka Жыл бұрын
I saw some other pilots complain about that too. The G-forces would be at the base of the mountain and at the crest if you did the smart thing of following the terrain, not the whole way up.
@jonathanbailie
@jonathanbailie Жыл бұрын
When you're going that speed, air becomes much more like a projectile hitting you rather than a fluid. The velocity specifically makes impact with the air catastrophic to anyone being ejected.
@Gib01
@Gib01 Жыл бұрын
It is seven ejections. Maverick, Phoenix and Bob, Maverick, Rooster and the two adversaries that Maverick fights. One ejects a split second before his damaged plane is hit by the missile fired by his compatriot and the other before his plane hits the mountain.
@SP-pd7pv
@SP-pd7pv Жыл бұрын
The real issue with the darkstar scene was that turn it did at mach 9
@thecollinzboy
@thecollinzboy Жыл бұрын
Dude that turn was over the entire United States it was not sharp like you say cw lemione a real pilot verified this
@srthebox4946
@srthebox4946 Жыл бұрын
You mean when it did a turn with the radius of a whole continent? I don’t think it could turn any less sharp than that
@fourpiggies8886
@fourpiggies8886 Жыл бұрын
It’s also editing. That scene fits that moment in the movie better. It doesn’t mean that scene literally happens immediately after he reached Mach 9.
@DeputyNordburg
@DeputyNordburg Жыл бұрын
I don't think Neil D is accurate. The altitude of the ejection means the air is VERY thin. I don't know if it's thin enough, but part of the reason the plane can go Mach 10.5 is it's pushing through very thin air. Also, the B-58 Huslter had a capsule ejection system that is pretty cool.
@johnp139
@johnp139 Жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@outdoorwolves9905
@outdoorwolves9905 Жыл бұрын
The B-1a was a pod idea but the B-1b that is flying today is ejection seats.
@cheddar2648
@cheddar2648 Жыл бұрын
Sometime around 2013, I rode my stripped down motorbike at night up from San Dawg to UCLA to hear the good doctor speak to an auditorium full of folks at UCLA. I then returned home, almost frozen. In fact, on the return trip, I was debating myself: slow down, and be warmer, or burn gas to get it over with. So hear me when I say it: stick to your swim lane, NDT. Love ya (proven).
The REAL Truth About the Final Top Gun Maverick Dogfight
16:58
Ward Carroll
Рет қаралды 444 М.
Neil deGrasse Tyson: 3 mind-blowing space facts | Big Think
14:00
Big Think
Рет қаралды 4,3 МЛН
100😭🎉 #thankyou
00:28
はじめしゃちょー(hajime)
Рет қаралды 58 МЛН
She ruined my dominos! 😭 Cool train tool helps me #gadget
00:40
Go Gizmo!
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
🍕Пиццерия FNAF в реальной жизни #shorts
00:41
Here's Why the Pentagon Didn't Pick the X-32
27:10
Ward Carroll
Рет қаралды 461 М.
Mooch's Review of TOP GUN MAVERICK
15:36
Ward Carroll
Рет қаралды 291 М.
A Heroic POW's Strange and Epic Journey
15:19
Ward Carroll
Рет қаралды 81 М.
Military Laws Broken: Top Gun (with real JAG)
24:57
LegalEagle
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
Everything Wrong With Top Gun: Maverick in 23 Minutes or Less
24:58
CinemaSins
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
That Time the Navy Threatened to Court Martial Me for Going on TV
37:13
How would the end mission from Top Gun 2 really be executed?
11:58
Binkov's Battlegrounds
Рет қаралды 525 М.
Fighter Pilot Paul Tremelling breaks down Top Gun: Maverick
12:20
Penguin Books UK
Рет қаралды 841 М.