Federer vs Nadal - All 38 H2H Match Points (HD)
Рет қаралды 570,926
6 жыл бұрынSubscribe for more H2H videos!
Full list of matches:
Year ● Winner ● Tournament - Round ● Score
2004 ● Nadal ● Miami - R32 ● 6-3 6-3
2005 ● Federer ● Miami - F ● 2-6 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-3 6-1
2005 ● Nadal ● French Open - SF ● 6-3 4-6 6-4 6-3
2006 ● Nadal ● Dubai - F ● 2-6 6-4 6-4
2006 ● Nadal ● Monte Carlo - F ● 6-2 6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(5)
2006 ● Nadal ● Rome - F ● 6-7(0) 7-6(5) 6-4 2-6 7-6(5)
2006 ● Nadal ● French Open - F ● 1-6 6-1 6-4 7-6(4)
2006 ● Federer ● Wimbledon - F ● 6-0 7-6(5) 6-7(2) 6-3
2006 ● Federer ● WTF - SF ● 6-4 7-5
2007 ● Nadal ● Monte Carlo - F ● 6-4 6-4
2007 ● Federer ● Hamburg - F ● 2-6 6-2 6-0
2007 ● Nadal ● French Open - F ● 6-3 4-6 6-3 6-4
2007 ● Federer ● Wimbledon - F ● 7-6(7) 4-6 7-6(3) 2-6 6-2
2007 ● Federer ● WTF - SF ● 6-4 6-1
2008 ● Nadal ● Monte Carlo - F ● 7-5 7-5
2008 ● Nadal ● Hamburg - F ● 7-5 6-7(3) 6-3
2008 ● Nadal ● French Open - F ● 6-1 6-3 6-0
2008 ● Nadal ● Wimbledon - F ● 6-4 6-4 6-7(5) 6-7(8) 9-7
2009 ● Nadal ● Australian Open - F ● 7-5 3-6 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2
2009 ● Federer ● Madrid - F ● 6-4 6-4
2010 ● Nadal ● Madrid - F ● 6-4 7-6(5)
2010 ● Federer ● WTF - F ● 6-3 3-6 6-1
2011 ● Nadal ● Miami - SF ● 6-3 6-2
2011 ● Nadal ● Madrid - SF ● 5-7 6-1 6-3
2011 ● Nadal ● French Open - F ● 7-5 7-6(3) 5-7 6-1
2011 ● Federer ● WTF - RR ● 6-3 6-0
2012 ● Nadal ● Australian Open - SF ● 6-7(5) 6-2 7-6(5) 6-4
2012 ● Federer ● Indian Wells - SF ● 6-3 6-4
2013 ● Nadal ● Indian Wells - QF ● 6-4 6-2
2013 ● Nadal ● Rome - F ● 6-1 6-3
2013 ● Nadal ● Cincinnati - QF ● 5-7 6-4 6-3
2013 ● Nadal ● WTF - SF ● 7-5 6-3
2014 ● Nadal ● Australian Open - SF ● 7-6(4) 6-3 6-3
2015 ● Federer ● Basel - F ● 6-3 5-7 6-3
2017 ● Federer ● Australian Open - F ● 6-4 3-6 6-1 3-6 6-3
2017 ● Federer ● Indian Wells - R16 ● 6-2 6-3
2017 ● Federer ● Miami - F ● 6-3 6-4
2017 ● Federer ● Shanghai - F ● 6-4 6-3
♫Music By♫
●Joakim Karud - Rock Angel
●Song/Free Download - • Video
●Support Joakim Karud - smarturl.it/joakimkarud
@philiptodd9313 Жыл бұрын
Between Basel 2015 and RG 2019 Roger won every match he played against Rafa when asked his secret he replied "don't play him on clay!"
@223_vishaldhabuwala4 Жыл бұрын
22> 20
@d-rose534 Жыл бұрын
If Federer didn't win those matches, he doesn't even have a positive record on hard, xaxaxaxa
@julien8206 Жыл бұрын
nad win vs federer in wimbledon , federer never win nadal in roland garros..
@danielvrodriguez81 Жыл бұрын
Nadal wins at the French, Federer wins at Wimbledon and now its 24-16 Nadal
@MM-hi Жыл бұрын
@@neophytosdm well said
@zangoat 6 жыл бұрын
*Nadal finishes eating a burger* Commentator: HE’S DONE IT
@mhlaclase178 5 жыл бұрын
Nadal 👋💪😘😘
@mhlaclase178 5 жыл бұрын
Nadal 👋💪😘😘
@daze6014 4 жыл бұрын
Lmaoo😂😂😂😂
@Walkman0007 4 жыл бұрын
uncle toni would let him, and later tell him he made the decision when he complained about stomach ache :p :p
@zangoat 3 жыл бұрын
MUFC how many crayons u eating on the daily my guy?
@alfonsoalejandrovelasquezn4230 5 жыл бұрын
If wasnt of nadal super talent, federer would be one of the most wining players on clay surface.
@aidanconn4292 2 жыл бұрын
A lot of people would man. Nadal is pretty much unstoppable on clay. Novak got lucky twice because nadal wasn’t at his best both times.
@gagdsgvgd6f734 2 жыл бұрын
@@aidanconn4292 🧂
@ltzvideos 2 жыл бұрын
@@aidanconn4292 but Novak get lucky really. Thai is a fact. Look the final last year of Roland garros lol Nadal just played Wong.
@quachwilliam8082 2 жыл бұрын
@@aidanconn4292 omg idiot talking. Novak got lucky? u sure? The only one can beat him twice at RG. Stop complaining about injuries idiot
@AsTERiiXHDx 2 жыл бұрын
@@aidanconn4292 federers only french open came because of Nadals mental and private problems in 2009 dfkm. Djokovic was the only player who actually stand a chance vs nadal on clay, federer definitely didnt lol
@overcraft1441 3 жыл бұрын
Nadal was 5 years younger than Federer so getting that initial rivalry at the beginning was unbelievable.
@michaela.5363 2 жыл бұрын
They met on clay most of the time during that initial period
@innosanto 2 жыл бұрын
They played 4 times on clay in 7 meetings, and Fed was not good on clay even before Nadal came.
@fastacelzapacescu5445 2 жыл бұрын
Unvelievable!
@user-cy6xl3vd3f 2 жыл бұрын
@@innosanto in 15 meetings they played 9 times on clay and 2 times in Miami on a slow hard court. That's 11/15 meetings where the surface advantaged nadal. Federer was always good on clay even before his prime since he won his 1st master 1000 title on this surface, beating Kuerten and Safin. However his best days on clay were probably 2005-2011.
@ziogustav 2 жыл бұрын
@@innosanto Federer had already played seven finals ATP on clay before meeting Nadal (and he was only 24). He was an excellent clay player.
@helenivanic1628 2 жыл бұрын
H2H Nadal 24 - 16 Federer Nadal leads Clay 14 to 2 Nadal leads Outdoor H/C 8 to 6 Federer leads Indoors H/C 5 to 1 Federer leads Grass 3 to 1
@sulabhsrivastava5332 2 жыл бұрын
Great summary 👍👍
@helenivanic1628 2 жыл бұрын
@@sulabhsrivastava5332 thanks. 😁👍
@sulabhsrivastava5332 2 жыл бұрын
Which country are you from?
@toothfungus5801 2 жыл бұрын
Damn those Clay matches got him good
@thsu8 Жыл бұрын
Can someone explain why Federer had an advantage on Indoor HC against Rafa?
@andersonfuller 2 жыл бұрын
Damn. I didn't realize Nadal took such a commanding lead so early into their time together. Honestly, kind of a testament to how good Nadal was to come onto the scene and take that many victories from the champ.
@pato20995 Жыл бұрын
Nadal was better from day 1
@patrickhauser588 Жыл бұрын
@@pato20995 Federer is the better player after all
@johnlouiepaderanga4165 Жыл бұрын
@@patrickhauser588 24-16 h2h 22 GS
@kiklocus4660 Жыл бұрын
its nadals forehand top spin bounce came on to feds weak side that is backhand ( in this particular case), styles make matches, its tough match up for fed. but he improved later stages of career
@dimitrisro5364 Жыл бұрын
@@kiklocus4660 correct, after he hired Ljubicic as a coach, his backhand improved greatly. Federer is tennis, pure talent, completely changed tennis to what we see now. Nadal is just a great athlete, he could excel on many sports.
@bacardibum 6 жыл бұрын
i don't think i've seen roger play better against rafa than at 2017 indian wells. he was on fire that match.
@mohammadsufian7890 6 жыл бұрын
bacardibum WTF Final in 2011
@MrPatrickbuit 6 жыл бұрын
WTF 2011 Roger was pretty incredible.
@TheFpzsomb 5 жыл бұрын
Wimbledon 06
@GiovanniGiorgio74 Жыл бұрын
Channelled his inner Wawrinka with that backhand!
@yulihan9011 Жыл бұрын
That first half of 2017 rog at 38 wooped everyone in the tour ass till his knee said enough at wimbledon if he could made the adjustments he made that season earlier in his career he would have had another 3/4 years of pure domminance
@jlwebster9 6 жыл бұрын
if you exclude losses, Federer is 15-0 against Nadal
@commondirtbagz7130 4 жыл бұрын
Justin Webster utter domination
@armstrongtixid6873 3 жыл бұрын
@MUFC Why are you on a tennis vid, then. Go watch soccer! (I call it football).
@johnmerchan1672 3 жыл бұрын
Neil Dixit don’t mind him he literally comments on every sporting video talking about how great soccer is and how shit every other sport is! Literally no life!
@armstrongtixid6873 3 жыл бұрын
@@johnmerchan1672 ikr
@habibhussain825 3 жыл бұрын
@@commondirtbagz7130 a better fudge of the head to head record is to omit clay matches they've played, federer leads Nadal 14-10 on hard and grass court matches, leading credibility to the fact Federer is a better multi -surface player than Nadal, Nadal being totally and utterly dominant on clay only...
@whedonobsessed 2 жыл бұрын
Imagine being Rog going through all these defeats in the first few years with Rafa on clay, and then it finally comes back around to grass and you lose that too. And then lose the Australian open. No wonder he was so emotional during that closing ceremony at the AO
@hardsam68 2 жыл бұрын
no that had nothing to do with it m8, the tears were about the crowd applause and also that he was standing in fron of one of our Australian greatest players Rod Laver
@utkarshdeshmukh6414 2 жыл бұрын
It was more so because Federer would have reach 14 slams had he won! Putting him level with Pete sampras!!
@sandeshreddy5347 2 жыл бұрын
@@utkarshdeshmukh6414 Not really, he thought that his dominance was being questioned by Nadal at that time, he thought he was invincible on Grass and Hard courts against Nadal, but his thoughts came wrong and Rafa clearly owned him during 2008-09, yes Pete's record might be one of the reason, but he broke down mainly because of the emergence of Nadal. He even lost 2008 AO to Djokovic, 2008 RG and Wimbledon to Nadal , 2009 AO to Nadal, imagine being no1 for about 4.5 years and to lose continuosly to one player on multiple surfaces, he felt his era was about to end and that's the reason he broke down(but he came back well in 2009 winning RG and Wimbledon)
@tolendoi123 Жыл бұрын
@@hardsam68 I’m sure it had a lot to do with it. Roger was in great form the entire tournament in fact, many people picked Federer as the favorite against Rafa in the final. In this match, there was still an ounce of belief in Federer that he knew if he plays his best, nobody can beat him, not even Nadal. This match was the true changing of the guard because there were no excuses, he’s fully recovered from his so called “mono” that hampered him in 2008 (which I think is not true) and Nadal beat him on a neutral surface.
@joeymooken651 Жыл бұрын
the respect between this two legends is beautiful to see
@taylorpack2839 4 жыл бұрын
“People always think of us as rivals but he was one of the very few that I liked, and even fewer that I respected. He remains the only person I envied.” -niki lauda
@ayaazbukhari8654 4 жыл бұрын
Taylor Pack big time rush
@michaela.5363 Жыл бұрын
I prefer Federer's style but Nadal is obviously one of the best overall and definitely the greatest on clay.
@lnz971 Жыл бұрын
The Greatest Period
@SENKKOH Жыл бұрын
@@lnz971 novak has a say in that he is the only one who beated nadal twice (even tho 2015 doesnt count because nadal wasnt himself but 2021 is legit) at roland garros and came close to beating rafa at his absolute prime (2013 semi finals RG we never saw and will never see a player that is able to challenge peak nadal as much as novak)
@joe-deanroberts3934 Жыл бұрын
@@SENKKOH 2021 he had a visible injury before the match.
@chasebrammer851 Жыл бұрын
He always has an injury when he loses Nadal fans get old Djokovic also lost a few slams based off i jury but we don’t bring it up
@kirby4599 Жыл бұрын
@@SENKKOH He also has a say in that he will have the most grand slams
@yusufluhar5881 6 жыл бұрын
Superb performance today. Absolute masterclass of attacking tennis.
@botchedcircumcision 6 жыл бұрын
Nadal is the GOAT why u don't understand? H2H is all that matter
@yusufluhar5881 6 жыл бұрын
Botched Circumcision So Davydenko and Dustin Brown r better than Nadal?
@botchedcircumcision 6 жыл бұрын
yes. I play my friend in tennis, he beats me 5 times, i only win 2 times. he is better.
@yusufluhar5881 6 жыл бұрын
Botched Circumcision Ok great theory. So Kyrgios is better than Djokovic but Murray is better than Kyrgios and Djokovic is better than Murray. Zverev is better than Djokovic, Djokovic is better than Nadal and Nadal is better than Zverev. Nadal is better than Federer, Federer is better than Davydenko and Davydenko is better than Nadal. Ur logic is outstanding.
@botchedcircumcision 6 жыл бұрын
yes
@shadapakap 6 жыл бұрын
This is a great video. My favorite match point was probably their 9th match starting at 3:51.
@Tronny 6 жыл бұрын
I really like your vids :)
@botchedcircumcision 6 жыл бұрын
thx bitc
@jonathanfox1 Жыл бұрын
This shows that Federer is human and felt the pressure- really interesting to see that most of the match points he faced, he tended to hit them out or in the net, very few were won off Rafa's racquet
@andrewkarlsson8621 Жыл бұрын
It took 13 years Federer to dominate Nadal after years of Nadals controlling the rivalry for a decade! Nadal revealed at the time that Federer is a human despite, dominating the rest of the field in 2004-2007 and Djokovic later on proved it too.
@Pearcewreck 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this H2H Tennis. Any chance of an update for matches 39 & 40.
@tarekmahmudbhuiyan7368 6 жыл бұрын
Nice and quick compilation.
@manojjena432 2 жыл бұрын
Most precious video! Wish the quality would be better..
@88feji 5 жыл бұрын
Its crazy we practically see Nadal's whole process of maturing from a brash young kid into adulthood but all the while Federer looks unchanged through the years ..(O.o)
@ivanpiketty1910 2 жыл бұрын
It's because Federer was already 24 when they met for the first time
@moaningpheromones Жыл бұрын
fed ages in the face like anyone would
@arpitgoel6547 Жыл бұрын
I think Nadal leads to Federer for a simple reason - Nadal is relatively stronger at Grass compared to Federer at Clay! Obviously on Hard courts, its been a balanced fight. Great rivalry!
@JohnSmith-jb2jf Жыл бұрын
That's true, but Nadal found a tactic that works. He avoided Roger's forehand as much as possible. Federer's backhand really only became great in his early 30's. It was the weakest part of his game. I'm a Roger fan and noticed this pattern pretty early on in the rivalry. It got to the point where Roger was running around the ball to put himself in position to hit forehands out of desperation, which opened up the court for Nadal to finish the point.
@townsley2 Жыл бұрын
I beg to disagree. Fed's record on clay is better than Nadal's on grass. Nadal has the overall lead just cause they met very often on clay where Federer could often reach the final, but Nadal has only beaten Fed once on grass in 2008 (Twas a great match in Wimbly final but it was the only time). Fed has beaten Nadal twice on clay. Great rivalry anyway !
@emiliodelcanto4179 Жыл бұрын
@@JohnSmith-jb2jf I have seen videos of matchs between federer and rafa before 2017, and in the rallys rafa plays to roger´s backhand 8 balls of 10.
@emiliodelcanto4179 Жыл бұрын
@@townsley2 In hard they are 11-9, and played more than in clay.
@JohnSmith-jb2jf Жыл бұрын
@@emiliodelcanto4179 Yeah and there's nothing cheap about it. That's just tennis. You exploit the weaknesses of the opponent. Nadal was just more well rounded overall.
@jerryjohn257 2 жыл бұрын
You missed Wimbledon 2019 where Federer won. Anyways great compilation of points so KUDOS to all your efforts 🙌
@YusufKhan-tu4pu 2 жыл бұрын
Dude, the video is 4 years ago
@bitwamet Жыл бұрын
He posted in 2017 and how can he know the future and make no sense🤣🤣
@nelsonc6173 6 жыл бұрын
The two greatest no question. But Nadal's dominance on clay is really unmatched and will never be replicated in tennis history. Fed, my fave, will go down as the greatest should he win his 20th GS, which I expect him to do next year, barring injuries of course. Sad to see Nadal and Fed grow old! The tennis world will miss them, as will the history books.
@thetruthofit398 5 жыл бұрын
FED > NOLE > RAFA
@nakitawarahi3083 5 жыл бұрын
What if nadal surpasses 20? Will he then become the greatest?
@stuewz 5 жыл бұрын
@@thetruthofit398 Bullshit
@knnthplsn 5 жыл бұрын
Dude, you realise that there wont be tennis playiers in history books right...?
@tarmiricmi670 4 жыл бұрын
What about Nadal's 19th Grand Slam title last night? 😂 Federer will never be the greatest.
@unowen7591 9 ай бұрын
Djokovic vs. Nadal had the most brutal rallies and matches, but imo Federer vs. Nadal was the most beautiful. The two had such contrasting styles of play. Will never see such a rivalry again.
@jerryt5007 6 жыл бұрын
For Fed fans like me, just jump to 12:45, 5 wins in a row and counting~
@heninkajarasolomanana2118 6 жыл бұрын
hahahaa
@stuewz 6 жыл бұрын
For Nadal fan jump it to 14:00... still 23-15 nadal lol
@Max-yp1iw 5 жыл бұрын
Jerry Tsai who cares? nadal was better before
@Mitchellwhite35 5 жыл бұрын
Nadal and fed respect each other nadal fans vs fed fans fight smh idiots
@rayand9265 4 жыл бұрын
Stuew majority was on clay, not surprising
@kb77777kg 6 жыл бұрын
I don't know how much I like this game because of federer. After his retirement the tennis player within me will be died for ever.... That's terrific
@whedonobsessed 2 жыл бұрын
:(
@christianbitar4216 6 жыл бұрын
15 clay matches and 3 grass matches.. that's why it's 23-15.. if atp tours included grass courts aswell.. -__- still fedal will remain the goats of tennis.
@MrPatrickbuit 6 жыл бұрын
I'm still salty that there's not a single Masters event on grass.
@skmalaujitra9580 6 жыл бұрын
not the king like nadal...nadal 31old 11 rg...federer 37 8 rg...nadal still the king
@skmalaujitra9580 6 жыл бұрын
not het not the king ..only king when u win more than 10 in one major tournament ..never heard commentatot say he is king they say rafa nadal the king n sharapova n serena william say he the goat..they are pro tennis so they no more n more than u so shut up fuckkk up kid
@thejdsgames1552 6 жыл бұрын
throughout his career, no matter whether Rafa was dominating Federer or not, Federer always beat Rafa at atp finals (until the last one)... even convincingly.
@skmalaujitra9580 6 жыл бұрын
nadal beat her more in grandslam kid ..n bagel federer
@Martining83 Жыл бұрын
La diferencia es que Roger siempre llegaba a instancias finales en clay... y jugaba/perdia con Rafa. En el resto de las superficies, Roger tambien llegaba a las instancias finales... pero Rafa quedaba en camino mucho antes...entonces no se enfrentaban.... eso podria haber decidido la balanza a favor del Suizo... la prueba de esto, son las cantidades de semi finales que jugo cada uno (RF 211 - RN 176)
@erwinsilva5363 Жыл бұрын
el problema paso que federer no debió nunca dejar que le ganara en rapida ni menos en pasto , es hay donde el tubo que marcar territorio y por eso la historia hoy esta como esta , federer es el indiscutible tercero de esta generacion , el dia que perdio la final del australianopen ante nadal supe que era asi , el tiempo me dio la razon
@alexpascual276 Жыл бұрын
Se han enfrentado en tierra en 16 ocasiones de 40 totales. 37 veces que se enfrentaron fueron en instancias finales (a partir de cuartos), aquí lidera Nadal. Incluso con la mitad de enfrentamientos en tierra, seguiría liderando Nadal.
@yaboi608 Жыл бұрын
after 2008 they only met 6 times on clay and 17 times on hard courts/grass courts. From 2008-present Nadal leads their head to head STILL 12-11 and 12-6 during Federer’s prime. Nadal is better period.
@forman208 5 жыл бұрын
It's crazy how Fed completely flipped the script on Nadal the last 2 years, after being dominated by him his entire career he's now beaten him with relative ease the last 5 times they've matched up
@thomasbrunkle8389 4 жыл бұрын
@Elias Federer is also not the one of 2003-2007 so it goes both ways.
@hardsam68 2 жыл бұрын
check out the french open semi final 2020 m8
@travisk9897 Жыл бұрын
@@hardsam68 Do you not understand how time works lmao? His comment was before that happened
@AbhilashGhosh-sh3if Жыл бұрын
Nadal is very lucky because he faced with faderer in clay 16 times
@kiklocus4660 Жыл бұрын
its nadals forehand top spin bounce came on to feds weak side that is backhand ( in this particular case), styles make matches, its tough match up for fed. but he improved later stages of career, and fed is not a bad clay player.
@srinitaaigaura 6 жыл бұрын
How much Nadal's shots used to loop up and bounce high in those early days!! Those head high balls to Roger's backhand gave him no attacking power off that wing. His footwork was more explosive, and he was a ball retrieving BEAST, a human equivalent of a brick wall on the other side. The only reason why Federer didn't get obliterated even sooner was because of his own athleticism and his serve. Federer on the other hand was always at a power disadvantage and locked up on the backhand, giving Nadal full control over the middle of the court inside the baseline, until the new racket came along. This year he's been hitting cannons on both wings and picking the ball incredibly early - now he's the one stepping into the court. Nadal now seems to have no idea what to do (except maybe still on clay). But both of them were cheetahs around the court 10 years ago. They have slowed down half a step since then, and lost a lot of hair ....
@user-yy2br1rn7e 5 жыл бұрын
I think Djoker Nole is the better ball returner compared to Nadal
@taylorpack2839 4 жыл бұрын
Buddy rod laver had the court sped up to be faster is why. Rafa can’t beat Roger on fast courts, it’s his worst surface. Watch the 09 final Australian is way slow like the us open now. If they played at the Us open rafa would beat him.
@innosanto 2 жыл бұрын
Nadal was focusing to make Fed not win, not himself to win, because he knew Fed is better in tennis. He also writes it in the book.
@abdullahmahdi3158 Жыл бұрын
That last line got me :3
@HockeyGambler94 6 жыл бұрын
That Federer's get in first point was unreal.
@TheSportfane 6 жыл бұрын
Great video. As we have all seen this year, a lot of the H2H reason is due to Rafa’s supernatural clay court play and the mental effects that has caused in their matchup. That said, as Roger said himself he can’t win them all against Rafa but if (there are no ifs, I know..) the clay courts wouldn’t have affected their rivalry that much, I believe Roger would have had around a 2/1 winning ratio in non-clay matches. Now it’s 1.3/1 (since winning the last 5) on grass/hardcourt/indoors and Roger himself has pointed out how much it has helped not playing him on clay.
@elliothartwig Жыл бұрын
Yeah, but if rafa had won every match Roger would have a 0-1 ratio
@sadritijani4245 6 жыл бұрын
It’s possible for the next video to put for every match the years et place?
@santoshchavan5572 2 жыл бұрын
OMG...nadal has completely dominated roger all the time....hard to realise it
@sain8827 2 жыл бұрын
No, mostly on clay. Calm down.
@duncan3932 2 жыл бұрын
@@sain8827 and on outdoor hard until 2017 which was Federer’s miracle year
@guarana6245 Жыл бұрын
@@sain8827 Even on hard for at least a half of their rivalry
@joelpaule2072 Жыл бұрын
@@sain8827 clay is still tennis, so the statement Nadal completely dominated Roger is correct.
@vil64 6 жыл бұрын
They both undoubtedly brilliant
@kabirmoghe 6 жыл бұрын
finally no biased comment
@youreacasual6305 Жыл бұрын
Nadal better tho
@user-yp5ho6ro2q Ай бұрын
23-10 It is astonishing that there was a time when there was such a difference. Rafa's perfection is astonishing, as he has been winning since he was a teenager against Roger at his peak. It is also important to note Roger's technique, which has greatly improved h2h from that point. The h2h since 2015 includes Roger's growth as well as Rafa's decline as reasons, but still this growth play is probably rare in history.
@antonwegmann6670 6 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one who thinks that the matchball at 7:27 wasn't out?
@thebigsquirrel50 6 жыл бұрын
Anton Wegmann Just the angle is poor
@dwilliams02 6 жыл бұрын
Maybe, but all parties involved seemed pretty sure. And even if it had been close to being in, that match was such a slaughter that I wouldn't be surprised if Fed just wanted it to be over.
@Boomshakalaka7654 2 жыл бұрын
Maybe he didn’t want roger to suffer lol 😂
@johnr7048 2 жыл бұрын
Imagine being as great as RF and LOSING 23 matches to just one other player. Let THAT sink in. Rafa is that good
@harshuttarwar1027 5 жыл бұрын
*King of Grass V/S King of Clay ...wow*
@sriram8339 4 жыл бұрын
Not king of grass..he is king of tennis..
@Punkster556 4 жыл бұрын
@@sriram8339 king of choke
@manojcm7567 4 жыл бұрын
@@sriram8339 and he never beat Nadal in FO where's Nadal was able to defeat prime Roger on grass in 2008.
@viksinha5410 3 жыл бұрын
@ManojCM7 Yes thanks to Federer’s pathetic performance in the first two sets
@viksinha5410 3 жыл бұрын
@Hamza Hussain Have you ever won a tennis match in your life?
@mattyarwood4318 4 жыл бұрын
Need to find the updated video with their last 2 matches
@SpoderBlitz 6 жыл бұрын
You should do Nadal vs Verdasco next.
@MrPatrickbuit 6 жыл бұрын
10:37 I think this rally sums up the H2H best
@Walkman0007 4 жыл бұрын
true that brother
@jsy361 Жыл бұрын
Nadal is a legend on all surfaces and stands alone on mt everest on clay. His grand slam records are unparalleled.
@VidZeen Жыл бұрын
What a bot comment lol
@jsy361 Жыл бұрын
Lol
@mateogomezhoyos9967 6 жыл бұрын
What's the intro's song?
@23mgab Жыл бұрын
Almost unbeatable on clay man, with his style of play, no one comes close to him all time on that surface.
@angelor96 Жыл бұрын
Crazy how from Basel 2015 Federer went 6-1 against Nadal. Nadal will always be the best on clay but it’s a testament to how devastating Federer is at his peak performance level.
@szankony6276 Жыл бұрын
Nope, it is all about pure math and probability of winning a point in the case of RF vs RN it maybe 50/50 50% 0.5 1/2 and... such scores are normal variance and easy to simulate using Monte Carlo simulation of milions of tennis matches.
@rosoru105 4 жыл бұрын
15 times they've played each other on clay (13-2 for Nadal). Only 4 times played on grass (3-1 for Federer). Now I understand why its 25-15 in favor of Nadal...
@Boomshakalaka7654 2 жыл бұрын
Nadal leads 8-6 on outdoor hard court. Don’t be silly
@adityagouravdas929 2 жыл бұрын
If it hurts you any more. 21>20 36>28 And 24-16 H2H.
@Djokovicgoat42 5 жыл бұрын
Can you please upload Djokovic and federer h2h
@mhlaclase178 5 жыл бұрын
That's why they are legendary Nadal 🇪🇸 Federer 🇨🇭 of tennis I love them because there's rivallies fabulous and special
@feidaronaine728 5 жыл бұрын
ch???????
@gratler Жыл бұрын
interesting that federer as he got older waaay out of his prime managed get a few more wins in the rivalry. I think for two main reasons: his backhand improved later in his career and second because he skipped more on the clay. i think if he had skipped more clay matches from the beginning their rivalry would be almost even. but ofc nadal deserves all the respect for beeing the best clay courter of all times so it should reflect in the rivalry also! and to be fair nadal has some important wins over fed on hard and grass.
@tylerjones7025 Жыл бұрын
Also Federer's racquet size change.
@tylerjones7025 Жыл бұрын
I think that greatly improved his game he should have done it earlier in his career
@notdn Жыл бұрын
ugh.
@tylerjones7025 Жыл бұрын
@@notdn I don't agree with everything he said I was just mentioning the racquet change because I think that really helped Federer when he played Rafa
@gratler Жыл бұрын
@@tylerjones7025 yes you are probably right. note I'm not a super expert on Tennis and this is just my superficial obvservation. I'm sure its much more complicated than that really.
@jondoe1851 6 жыл бұрын
dayum...this should be viewed as a tribute to their great rivalry....not spark a fan war.....C'mon people, it's been over a decade now, can't we stop this bickering already. If anything, this season has shown just how special they both are and how much they respect each other. Why can't we do the same?
@alexanderanthony 6 жыл бұрын
Bravo!!!!!!!!!
@witness445 9 ай бұрын
Anyone know what song this beat is from?
@zakariaez497 6 жыл бұрын
8:35 nadal holding the laugh LOL
@dwilliams02 6 жыл бұрын
Can anyone tell what they said to each other at 11:30? I can't hear it except maybe Federer saying "Yeah..." but it sort of looks like maybe Nadal was asking if Federer was okay (healthy) given how one-sided the match was and Federer maybe alluded to something at which point Nadal sort of grimaced with sympathy?
@ashwinikumar2290 6 жыл бұрын
He just replied "Uhh.. I am okay.." which he clearly wasn't. But that's what you say to respect your opponent.
@wallygropius4451 6 жыл бұрын
Fed tweaked his back in IW 2013 a match or two prior to the Nadal one, which was one of the main reasons for his horrible season in 2013.
@ronniarbitiaas3095 6 жыл бұрын
It's a true miracle for tennis fans to see these two guys still occupy the world no.1 and no.2 today.
@aidanconn4292 2 жыл бұрын
I love how these two guys respect the h_ell out of each other.
@paultonn7381 6 жыл бұрын
I'm a Nadal Fan but I love both of them more than Djokovic and Murray
@louismiller4374 6 жыл бұрын
I am a Roger fan. I always support Rafa when Roger doesn’t play. Never got this whole jealousy thing some people have going on.
@mickaellandry9726 5 жыл бұрын
Not suprised at all. Nole is more complicated to beat than Federer for Nadal.
@hardsam68 2 жыл бұрын
Wow, I never realised he never lost to Roger at the French in all those years, and still cannot beleive they never met at the US open?
@rehan9746 Жыл бұрын
He lost once in semi I think... And rogger won that French open
@mauricebrew7712 Жыл бұрын
Same here with the US Open.
@SebastianSaavedra28 Жыл бұрын
@@rehan9746😂 it was soderling mate
@RefluxZz 4 жыл бұрын
I don’t understand the “Nadal is only ahead because of all the clay game” like is it not clay for both or is it just clay for fed? It’s the same for both so I don’t understand the issue, can someone explain ?
@rireyt4416 5 жыл бұрын
Two legends
@boazboaz2625 Жыл бұрын
In my opinion, most people ignore that Federer was unbeaten against Rafa since he get used to the bigger racket except FO. If Roger would have made that decision earlier, It might be an entirely different story altogether. Lack of tactical, bold and creative prowess cost Federer the Goat status.I should include over confidence too. But I believe talent-wise nobody is better than Roger, but perseverance, fighting spirit, and determination will always overtake talent in any given field.
@abeguy7981 Жыл бұрын
The bigger racket isn't helping him against joker at sw19 or uso... It's not about age or rackets, Nadal and joker are better than fed. Mentally Nadal is toughest, followed by joker then its fed... It might sound ludicrous but a 2 hand BH is now more potent in tennis
@boazboaz2625 Жыл бұрын
@@abeguy7981 I was talking about performance enhanced with a bigger racket head Coming to sw19 Federer was the better player for almost 90-95% of the match, but the unbelievable play in three tie breakers by nole(zero unforced errors in 3 sets)presented him the title. Post change of racket size Federer's record vs his toughest opponent has been 5-1(Loss at FO) and he can at least able to compete at the same level with the GOAT contenders,being past his prime and 5 years older. Age plays a significant role in a sport like tennis and has proven time and again in the past. The first exception in the open era is Federer himself.
@abeguy7981 Жыл бұрын
@@boazboaz2625 Nadal and joker have won 8 slams in their 30s so stop this aging BS. Agassi lost to fed at uso open when he was 35 but no pundit said aggasi lost due to age. Sampras lost to fed at sw19 but nobody said sampras was beyond his prime. Acknowledge talent, fact remains fed was always second fiddle to Nadal at rg and jojer dethroned him as king of grass by beating him thrice at sw19 finals. Only stat that matters in goat debate is number of slams.
@boazboaz2625 Жыл бұрын
@@abeguy7981 Grow up and understand the facts Answer lies in your reply only Nole and rafa won in their 30's due to the advancement of technology, recovery methods and science. That is why they are winning in their 30's which nobody was able to do before this generation. Now coming to your Sampras and Agassi argument 20 year old Roger doesn't achieved anything and sampras considered greatest grass court player until that point and winner of past 4 years, obviously nobody will talk about age, In Agassi case nobody doubted Federer's win except you I guess, because Federer at his prime and Agassi was 34. Due to age factor, Agassi lost all of their last 8 meetings where he won the first 3. And for your final comment my reply is I am not arguing that Federer is the greatest, please read my comment once.
@abeguy7981 Жыл бұрын
@@boazboaz2625 Yes we agree fed isn't the greatest.. He's a clay dodger and now a grass dodger.. He's stubborn coz He's finished but he won't admit he's done... The only technology you need is IQ implant coz fed always rants about old age while Nadal and jojer are winning even in their 30s. Why doesn't Murray win in his 30s ?? You are a certified idiot and I'm shutting you now coz u r pesky and a fool.. You get lost with fed in stupid laver cup, I'm interested in wimbledon rite now rather than talk about a guy who flees from slams.. Hehe .. 😉
@TheRealDetectiveM 6 жыл бұрын
People say how devastating the Nadal loss in the AO this year was but honestly Federer losing to Nadal in Wimbledon is the most damning loss of them all. Federer never beat Nadal at the French while Roger lost at his kingdom of Wimbledon. Just my two cents but they're both the two greatest players atm but Djokovic could definitely make a stake for the throne.
@waynezhang8755 6 жыл бұрын
if you count matches, Djoker won most to Nadal and most to Feder matches.
@masters.1000 6 жыл бұрын
Michael Riechmann Despite Djokovic won against both of them and also the four Grand Slams at the same time, I think he never will be considered in the debate. Roger first, Nadal second.
@ArchHades 6 жыл бұрын
I agree, Federer in his prime losing to Nadal at Wimbledon is the most damning loss of them all. Sure Djokovic beat Fed at Wimbledon but that wasnt until Fed was 33 years old and had lost to bums like Tsonga and Stakhovsky. Fed would have won 7 Wimbledons in a row if not for that 9-7 in the 5th.
@saiparayan4047 2 жыл бұрын
This has aged beautifully
@TheRealDetectiveM 2 жыл бұрын
@@saiparayan4047 haha Djokovic is the GOAT now, maybe Nadal will put up one last stand but gonna be extremely tough
@seba5837 6 жыл бұрын
Pure gold
@and4144 2 жыл бұрын
Os maiores👏👏👏👏👏👏
@seytannavukat9205 6 жыл бұрын
I think it's about timing for example now it's both peak but when nadal was playing bad (09,14,15) they didn't play much only 2 but when federer wasn't playing that good(08,10,13) they played 13 matches
@vincentprakash4891 6 жыл бұрын
şeytanın avukatı Federer wasn't too bad in 08. Nadal was too good in 08.
@harikrishnanp4357 6 жыл бұрын
şeytanın avukatı thats because when fed was bad he was good enuf to reach semis and finals and face Nadal while Nadal never goes past the 1st week if he is not in form
@tattwa1 6 жыл бұрын
+Harikrishnan P very true. Also let's not forget that 2008 is the year when Roger had the mono and back issue. Until that their h2d was Federer 6-8 of which Nadal's 6 wins came on clay.
@aymansab8952 6 жыл бұрын
that's why. h2h sometimes doesn't reflex the reality. huge respect for Nadal but Federer is genius and the king of tennis
@bazingadude2492 6 жыл бұрын
The thing is when Federer is playing "bad" he is still better than 99% of the tour... so he still gets far enough into tournaments for Rafa to beat him. When Rafa is playing bad well...
@thestar3906 3 жыл бұрын
Its a fact that Nadal mentally overcame Federer when he was playing his best and was No. 1. Of course the same thing happened to Nadal when Djokovic returned the favor
@hardsam68 2 жыл бұрын
not quite right m8
@notdn Жыл бұрын
djoker has nothing to do against absolute prime nadal ^^
@guarana6245 Жыл бұрын
@@notdn He literally beat prime Nadal 7 times in a row in 2011, 2 of those in clay masters, and in straight sets
@notdn Жыл бұрын
@@guarana6245 LMFAO end of 2011 nadal was not even near its middle form due to various problems... you think it would work cause "maybe he will not know it"? embarrassing, silly liar ^^
@guarana6245 Жыл бұрын
@@notdn Nadal in 2011 was coming of his best year ever, and even in 2011 he was bashing everyone but Djokovic. He himself stated "In 2011 my problem was Djokovic, because I was winning against anyone and loosing to him". He would won 3 majors yet again in 2011 if it were not for Djokovic. You have to be blind to look at those matches and not notice that Rafa was in his absolute prime there
@baptistegeslin2252 Жыл бұрын
how many games on clay ?
@orenmiller9752 4 жыл бұрын
Where is French open 2019 and wimbeldon 2019?
@vickymooney6535 6 жыл бұрын
2013 and 2017 were very one sided years. Nadal completely owned Federer in 2013 with wins in Rome, Indian Wells, Cincinnati, ATP World Tour Finals along with a straight sets win at 2014 Australian Open... This year Federer dominated Nadal.
@Boomshakalaka7654 2 жыл бұрын
Let’s not act like fed dominated Rafa on hard court either he trails 6-8 on outdoor hard court 😂😂. Definitely not my greatest
@Walkman0007 4 жыл бұрын
please make a new one with the latest matches
@hanzvargas3090 4 жыл бұрын
Legend vs legend
@JosesAmazingWorlds 2 жыл бұрын
Nadal has beaten Federer at every GS final. Federer could never beat Nadal at the French.
@michelez715 2 жыл бұрын
Didn't Fed beat Rafa at AO final 2017?
@travisk9897 Жыл бұрын
@@michelez715 Yes he did. Why don't you reread the comment you replied to
@dewman7477 Жыл бұрын
@@travisk9897 he said every grand slam finals, not every RG final. So based on OP comment he is wrong
@travisk9897 Жыл бұрын
@@dewman7477 I can't tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me. OP said Feds couldn't beat Nadal at French to which "Michele Z" said didn't Fed beat Rafa at AO final 2017. I was saying that Micheles comment is irrelevant because the AO is not the French
@samuelbellingham7180 4 жыл бұрын
If their now 40 hth matches had been split evenly across the four surfaces (10 on clay, 10 on grass etc) the record would be 20:20. Clay: Fed 1:9 Nadal; Grass: Fed 7:3 Nadal; Outdoor Hard: Fed 4:6 Nadal; Indoors: Fed 8:2 Nadal
@ltzvideos 2 жыл бұрын
That years was the years I've started watching tennis. I remember that times I saying to my mom about this two, Federer was the best, but Nadal was his kryptonite lol. And was. Nadal starting flying.
@metblvette 3 жыл бұрын
The most objective way to measure who is better is to look at the statistics on the ATP site, and then form your opinion. -Federer has 310 weeks at number one, and Rafa has 209 weeks at number one. -In their H2H, Federer leads on grass 3-1 and hard court 11-9, and Rafa leads on clay 14-2. -On grass, Federer has 19 titles and Rafa has 4 titles. -On hard court, Federer has 71 titles and Rafa has 22 titles. -On clay, Federer has 11 titles and Rafa has 59 titles. Based on these statistics, one can objectively conclude that as of now Federer is the better grass court player, the slightly better hard court player, and Rafa is the by far the better clay court player. From there, you can make arguments that maybe Federer or Rafa was injured during certain periods or that certain wins were more significant, but you have to start with the facts first rather than leading with opinion.
@mq46312 6 жыл бұрын
Nadal stopped watching at 12:44.
@syednoorerasul 5 жыл бұрын
Now he won't
@ethelberht4750 7 ай бұрын
Those backhands in the first clip... holy f you can tell Fed was rattled by the topspin. Today any challenger player would handle that better.
@michaelst3691 6 жыл бұрын
Roger has turned it around this year. Can Rafa respond?
@taylorpack7705 3 жыл бұрын
Of course he didn’t listen to me. For James, one world title was enough. He had proved what he needed to prove, to himself, and anyone who doubted him and 2 years later he retired. When I saw him next in London, me as champion again and him as broadcaster, he was barefoot, on a bicycle, with a flat tire. Still living each day like his last. When I heard he died at age 45 of a heart attack... I wasn’t surprised... I was just sad... people always think of us as rivals, but he was one of very few that I liked, and even fewer that I respected. He remains the only person I envied. -Niki lauda, on his rivalry with James hunt
@jumratulhawa2039 5 жыл бұрын
Now become 24-15
@grovesy1179 Жыл бұрын
A lot of their matches were on clay weirdly
@pjchj3599 6 жыл бұрын
2017-2018 It revenge time of Federer . Maybe end year of 2017 ,H2H is 23-16
@mariocarucci4534 6 жыл бұрын
Clay: 13-2 Nadal Hard OD: 8-6 Nadal Hard ID: 5-1 Federer Grass: 2-1 Federer Nadal won the 72,4% of matches on clay and HC OD, Federer won the 77,8% of matches on HC ID and grass. However, the 76,3% of all 38 matches have been played in the 2 Nadal's favorite surfaces: that's the explanation for such a domination in H2H
@mariocarucci4534 6 жыл бұрын
man bat It looks like you don't know that indoor and outdoor are two completely different condition, and outdoor conditions are also influenced by temperature and humidity. You arbitrary decided that hard court outdoor is always a more favorable condition for Federer, it's not always like that. Furthermore, just to state the obvious, conditions comparison can't be made on different surfaces: grass is always faster than hard, as well as hard is always faster than clay.
@sportsflashback5335 4 жыл бұрын
U r only complaining abt Rafa's fav surface..why don't u complain abt Federer's fav surface..why Federer fans exclude clay surface..is any other sport played there..
@yussepig6629 2 жыл бұрын
Nadal GOAT
@leegray99 Жыл бұрын
No matter how hard Federer hit the ball, he doesn't t grunt so it proves some players dont need to do it every shot
@moaningpheromones Жыл бұрын
they don't need to do it at all. no idea why they do. seles started that shit.
@josepmontesinos1994 Жыл бұрын
@@moaningpheromones horrible habit popularised by Seles and later Nadal. Rod Laver hit rockets with heavy wooden rackets in silence, so did Edberg, Sampras, Federer with modern rackets. If they want to intimidate the rival, just do a Haka before the match and then play in silence, please.
@sharadmohip6536 Жыл бұрын
Can someone tell me why they met 17 times on clay ? Are there so many clay tourneys ?
@FrancisCordieri Жыл бұрын
The amount of games they ve played on clay is the reason why it tends so much for Rafa..
@Boomshakalaka7654 2 жыл бұрын
Rafa is 12-6 vs federer in his prime lol 😂 lol 😂 . Greatest huh ?😂
@aranighosh3945 2 жыл бұрын
Nadal is the Goat on Clay.
@raulelchurro 2 жыл бұрын
Your mother?
@thebigsquirrel50 6 жыл бұрын
We all knew this would happen eventually... Just waiting for Dustin-Nadal...
@rowanvedangi100 6 жыл бұрын
TheBigSquirrel 50 Let it devolop to like 7-0
@thebigsquirrel50 6 жыл бұрын
Rowan Vedangi good point...
@adithyanaren519 6 жыл бұрын
Dustbin Brown 💩👎
@thomasbrunkle8389 6 жыл бұрын
TheBigSquirrel 50
@thebigsquirrel50 6 жыл бұрын
Adithya Naren *Dustin You still can't spell worth a 💩 can you?
@adityagouravdas929 Жыл бұрын
It's 24-16 now 36-28 at masters 59-54 in terms of big titles won And the most important one 22-20 at Grandslams.
@karlesmusic Жыл бұрын
Master Cup, 2on big tournament after GS, Master Cup Federer 6 Nadal 0 Federer 310 weeks nº1, Nadal 209 Federer 103 titles, Nadal 92 Federer 1251 wins, Nadal 1066 Federer better in 3 surfaces, grass and hard. Nadal only in Clay Federer better than Nadal!
@francescosaveriorotondi5975 Жыл бұрын
Wow, I didn't realize this was so one sided until I saw these matches one after the other
@jasongsux3520 6 жыл бұрын
Nadal is so much better, always was. 9-3 in slams, lol!
@thomasbrunkle8389 6 жыл бұрын
20>16 didn't they teach you that in elementary school?
@stuewz 5 жыл бұрын
man bat hahaha
@thetruthofit398 5 жыл бұрын
@man bat nadal has literally lost 5 in a row now to federer since fed turned 35 ahahahahahahahahahha
@Rohit-yb5nf 4 жыл бұрын
10-3
@Introverder 4 жыл бұрын
@@Rohit-yb5nf 10-4
@io147 6 жыл бұрын
If Federer had always played like in 2017....h2h 30-8 for Federer
@louismiller4374 6 жыл бұрын
37-1, gotta give RG 2008 to Nadal tho. I’m gracious
@Emre-fk6hm 6 жыл бұрын
Louis Miller lol, You guys just cant deny that Prime Nadal would kick Prime Fed ass so bad. And actually he did 23-15...
@taylorpack2839 5 жыл бұрын
Buddy federer was 10 times better in his younger days wth are you talking about, there’s no way a 35 year old man is going to beat a prime 20 year old who’s fast and hardly possible to hit a winner on.
@aleksamilosevic8792 5 жыл бұрын
@@taylorpack2839 37-1XDDDD????
@user-yl5qz2xe3m 3 жыл бұрын
Intro song name
@ethanli4191 Жыл бұрын
I think fed’s only shortcoming is backhand rally ability, he can cover the back hand side when he was young
@Introverder 6 жыл бұрын
I like 12:45 - 14:05 part. Still a LOOT of bitterness here. But at last Federer found a way on Nadal :) and Nadal I guess cannot longer exploit Federer's backhand. And 15-23 is not 10-23 or 1-6 (especially when we exclude clay court matches and then we have 13-10 for Federer :) ). Moreover it is possible that Federer will continue to skip the clay court part season, so it can help Federer make their h2h even more even.
@Aman-nk5uq 6 жыл бұрын
Yaa the way he smashed that ball clearly tells you how badly he wanted that. After AO 2017, his celebrations against Nadal havent been this animated.
@NLLeFa 6 жыл бұрын
If you want to exclude the clay, exclude the indoors too. That would still make Nadal more dominant on the h2h. He leads on outdoor hard courts as well. Both of them have their specific surface. For Fed is super fast low bouncing hard or grass. For Nadal is either clay or high bouncing medium speed outdoor hard court. Both are legends.
@fabiogaucho77 6 жыл бұрын
Well, think this way. If Roger played on clay the same level of Pete Sampras, one of the greats of the Open Era, he would have only faced Nadal a couple of times on that surface, max, and therefore would be leading the total H2H. So the paradox is that Federer is good enough on clay to make a bunch of SF and F against Nadal but not good enough to win them, which tilts the H2H against him.
@Aman-nk5uq 6 жыл бұрын
Nadatards and logic dont go hand in hand.
@Aman-nk5uq 6 жыл бұрын
How beautifully Rafa avoided fed from 2004-2008 in US open and Aus open losing in 3rd 4th rounds and now in grass since 2011 wimbledon. Hasnt reached a qf ffs.
@jimnosnow4484 4 жыл бұрын
Hard Court: 11-9 Fed Clay Court: 14-2 Rafa Grass Court: 3-1 Fed Indoor Court: 5-1 Fed Unfair.... no?
@adrianotranquilli8367 4 жыл бұрын
Outdoor= 8-6 Rafa..
@jimnosnow4484 4 жыл бұрын
Adriano Tranquilli, Only 3 outdoor hard court matches played before 2010 compared to 11 outdoor matches after 2010. Plus, 2017 outdoor h2h was 4-0 Fed when both returned to peak form
10 News First
Рет қаралды 69 МЛН
WivoRN Productions
Рет қаралды 256 М.
Tennis & Chill
Рет қаралды 774 М.
Polk Tennis
Рет қаралды 92 М.
Tennis TV
Рет қаралды 232 М.