yeah, thats why all fencing scoring machines switched to fractions ever since

@@praveenakaash9095 same thing happened to Mary Kom with Colombian opponent. 😢

Wasn't it the timekeepers mistake for misinterpreting the judges request and also the judges for adding a full second.

@@gezzapk Not really the fault of the judges since the technical limitation of the clock forced them to add a full second

It's not really the olympics, its the IFC who fucked up.

John Smith we have now (and for over 4 or 5 years at least) 😁

It wasn't there, I thought that much was evident? Idk about you but I just watched a whole video about it

Well, it's hard to foresee and account for all possible situations that might arise. They clearly didnt think such a situation would arise when they made the rules to use those clocks.

Lol well said

It is. As a fencer myself, every mili-second (even smaller) counts.

Yeah it’s weird as. Because of the way it worked out, I’m absolutely in Shin’s corner and think she was the rightful winner. But that’s already based on a rule that randomly decides one of the competitors gets an advantage. If they must have that rule it should be known beforehand who will have priority based on ranking or high standing in the preceding tournament or something. Randomness just feels wrong in that situation

@@BD-yl5mh It's probably so that games don't last too long or so they never end in draws. But yeah, dumb rule.

That's the dumbest rule i've ever seen

An option that i thought in literally five minutes: give priority to the fencer that scored the first point.

@@Guilherme-ip5lh But what if all preceding points are double hits?

Wow awesome

And I am Keyser Soze

Well. I dont feel bad. If your only hope is a tie and for time to run out, you dont deserve a win.

@@lhagiduty the problem is, she's performing so well and she followed every single rule, the problem is not hers, it's a technical problem. can you imagine watching something that you work so hard to achieve get ripped in front of your very eyes because of someone else's mistake, and unfortunately that "someone else" is in power, so they bring you down. the problem didn't came from her, so it is unfair and unjust.

@@mizanmazfullah152 she still played to not lose instead of playing to win lmao got what she deserved

I mean... Would it change anything? Olympic fencing is a mix of really bad rules and corrupt judges that it's just laughable. Not long ago, a guy stabbed his own leg and was awarded a point, even after a video replay analysis...

He explained this in the video. The clock does have milliseconds, but only displays seconds (much like your computer's clock). When the clock was accidentally started, the only thing they could do is set it back to 1 second. It's unfortunate for sure, but it was the only action available.

@@muizzy My phrasing was a bit off. I meant that they should at least have a clock that displays milliseconds,

it's a medieval sport so that aspect may have been left out purposely

Midaspl as a fencer, that is a bullshit and can’t be possible.

@Dr Boom pretty sure most handheld devices had the processing power to count in milliseconds by 2012

you dont listen too good huh? the olympics has whatever they want but the fencing rules dictate what they use and theyre hardly going to change the rules mid olympic final are they

That’s not at all what he said. Can you set your phone timer to 2 milliseconds?

Gaming Videos, and to think that it was in 2012!

All the machines that have timers were updated even at the club level to include milliseconds. Don't remember when it happened but it was as a direct result of this.

They should remove their helmets for the last point in case of a tie.

No, Because If you're a champion title holder, you should win, because you're the best. If someone could manage to beat you or balanced you, you're not the champion anymore. It works that way with many Martial Arts Championship too (Not All).

@@heriander_ I think to become the champion you must beat the champion. A draw isn't enough since it doesn't prove you're more deserving of the title.

@pyro Maybe fencers would finally learn to hit without being hit back?

@@teacherdoug1797 usually they do, like in this case where it took several tries and minutes of constant attacks to do so. But when two fencers are so evenly matched, there is a need to end a match or else it will continue for way too long.

So you've never made a mistake when you were under a lot of pressure?

@@elmo4979 by your logic if "everyone is human and human make mistakes" then teams should start bribing officials to make dumbass mistakes like these so they can win

@@elmo4979 shut up elmo

​@@burentori9620 That's not by his logic at all lmao. What are you even talking about?

Eric Ness can your scoreboard be set down to the millisecond?

@@colinmurphy2214 🤡🤡🤡

@@colinmurphy2214 shhhhhADDAP!

Lucky. I somehow ran the 100m in 7 seconds according to my school and the guy about 3 meters behind me ran it in 5.3? Yeah I don’t know.

Jaylen Liu Yeah you ran world record time beaten by 2 seconds xD

in fencing dont count miliseconds

@@marvinsilverman4394 death comes in nanosecond. Fencing is a death sport

Well, now they do

@@marvinsilverman4394 It is a sport in which hits happen in less than a second. I don't see why they wouldn't need clocks that could measure in increments of a second. Even without thinking about this unlikely situation it just makes sense to have more precise clocks since the sport revolves around movements faster than a second.

the truth is, they didn't even care about the sport itself, they just care about money they're just trampling the athletes with corruption.

I see

I can see how frustrated she is, she couldn't possibly defend at her best after struggling in such a helpless situation.

Funny af😂😂😂😂

@@viralviruz8694 Of course she had no choice but to lose because the game wasn't over until Heidemann won.

Forrest sos My thoughts exactly!

lmao

The solo problem is u only ducking a computer 😂

Emulator save states

I guess, expect thats on the player, this was an error by the officials

World cup?

Olympics > World cup

DevilVocano nAh check viewers and stats the World Cup is much bigger than the olympics

Nope 2010 World Cup was watched by 3.2 billion people according to FIFA, olympics were watched by 3.6 billion people according to IOC.

Seto 78 but by the amount of disciplines, athletes and honor gained for winning, Olympics is way bigger than WC

They won’t. Coz almost nobody care. And they knew it

Lol The only reason she would've won was due her name being drawn which means she got the advantage of winning if it remains a draw after extra time. That's a bs rule. She would've won by luck. Heidemann won by skill.

No, she was given an unfair advantage through that priority rule, and the time that restarted was for both, if she would have attacked, probably it would had been drawn and she won unfairly

@@MrOP-jw1zp it’s a strange rule definitely. However, there still was an error and injustice when that error could not be corrected properly due to poorly written rules and equipment.

@@divyanshagarwal5001 it’s a strange rule. The issue here is not about skill, but about application of accepted rules. A clear error was made by the officials, they knew what happened and by how much. They just couldn’t fix it because of bad planning and it seems no punishment occurred for the officials.

Ah, Great Deutschland. Lol

Have you been there?

I can feel her. Having priority and loses

@@javiedkawification cheated not lost.

@@huskiehuskerson5300 lost, not cheated

@@THX--jp8sy both.

What do you do if it's a double hit or 5 double hits in a row?

v2nkata I guess that would be a situation where random would be acceptable because there is literally no other choice

That's why I'm not a big fan of épée fencing. Sabre for the win :D

Jacob Ciolino that's not a bad idea, actually!

I did not know it was random. That's bull.

probably because it's human activated and electronically stopped (somebody launch the timer but as soon as there is a hit detected it stop) and the human had weaker reflex than the athlete to the referee count down

퇴장 시켜도 할말없는 수준인데 계속 속행함. ㅋㅋ

All sports need tweaking. You were watching a video about The worst thing to happen in the sport. Compare that to ghost-goals being allowed in football/soccer before they even started using cameras to check.

This is only one part of the sport, Epee. Epee is the most straightforward if you were to look a Foil or Sabre, then you would see the other side of the sport where Right-of-Way has a say in how things are scored.

Epee doesn't really need tweaking. Its up to the fencer if the score is even if they want to let the time run out and have someone randomly given an advantage. Its kind of part of the game. You have to make the decision to either play more aggressive or take the gamble that you'll get the advantage.

I was competetive for some Time It's never choosen randomly my friend ;) There are rules even for it :p

Well if you think about it, she could have tried to get a point too. Instead she tried winning by a technicality. Expiring with a draw and she was "priority" meaning in the event of a draw she would be the winner. The sport isn't about getting to a draw, then win off of a silly rule technicality. It is about poking people and not getting poked back.

exactly you dont know, The reason its there is for chase

J Bav explain me please. why is it that someone has an advantage by chance? why don‘t you have a rule based on the players performance instead of pure luck? like the first player who gets the hit has the advantage. or after the time‘s over you just fight until one gets a point in advance.

@@dankeman5266 theres no better explanation than "rule exist for a reason" honestly And these kinds of "advantageous" rules out of players control do exist in a lot of sports The easiest logical explanation from me is so the game wouldnt end up in stalemate It will be funny if both fighters is inherently defensive and both just waited to counter (thus no one even try to attack) MAYBE there is a better way to decide who got the priority or how should they end the match But its totally fine with me, after all they all knew about the rules, are perfectly trained to strategize their play around it and have exprienced having advantage or disadvantageous position from it Thats just my take anyway

@@dankeman5266 u can get priority/in control when u Parry and Riposte, which is why Shin was still in priority and it didn't go to Heidemann (Or u can get priority by being the one who attacks). It was not random. Since they both scored at the same time, the priority holder remained. Shin would have totally won in the last 0.2s but it was a tragic end. The person speaking in this video made a mistake.

Sen. George Franklin try fencing for 10 days and it will be clear

do people still whip their epee around for free points?

@@bramcasteur8926 I mostly do sabre with some foil experience so I'm not as aware of epee cheating. Sabre is admittedly easier to cheat at because of dead spots in the lames. I know of some people/clubs either bringing dead lames when the local tournaments don't test, or (if the club is hosting) not testing lames on purpose and directing their members to use dead ones. Also, much more skilled fencers taking dives in DEs to make sure their teammates receive ratings or qualify. Lots of fun when you're trying to be a fair player.

You can't say this and not give us some juicy examples to look up 🤺😜

@@Ami-ut2us no instances (that I know of) made an impact large enough to make the news. Fortunately I never witnessed any cheating at higher levels (regionals, nationals) though I expect it still happens. Unsurprisingly, it's easier to cheat at lower, local levels (see my above comment). The issue is that those lower levels are what allow you to qualify and compete in higher level competitions. I was personally cheated out of a rating because of a skilled fencer taking a dive when fighting one of their team members. I'm not saying it's impossible to achieve a rating or qualify fairly, it just makes it more difficult and you sometimes have to compete well outside your local area to avoid known cheaters.

What an injustice she lost despite randomly being assigned priority...

@@olebergst.5828 Thats a good point lol

I mean... just remember two teams playing football, after 90 minuties one team gets + 1 goal so only has to defend while the other team has to make 2 goals to win and 1 to break even in 10 minutes after play time - then they get an extra 30 seconds, score two times and the other team starts crying like Jackson Spencer because it was injustice. This is a farce. She lost DESPITE BEING ASSIGNED AN UNFAIR RANDOM ADVANTAGE and that manchild is crying "cheating, injustice!". That's utterly ridicolous.

Uhm, no, apparnetly she was not the winner. Who was assigned the win? Who got the medal? Who did a better piece of fencing in this fight? Clearly the German. The rule is stupid, no matter what, and it's somewhat of an injustice not to acknowledge that. She won DESPITE a random disadvantage and has proven to be the better fencer, why are you guys all so bitter? Because a stupid random rule was trumped by a split second extra time? Beyond pathetic.

@@olebergst.5828 the "split second extra time" was stretched. we all saw in the video how many chances she managed to push in within her .5 sec previously. obviously the extra .8 sec meant a lot in this match. furthermore, she was at a RANDOM disadvantage. you said it yourself. The priority was random and either party had equal chance. That is why her winning despite this 'disadvantage' isn't any help to your arguement. She tried 3 times within 1 sec and hadn't managed to land a blow. how is she a better fencer?

Basically, the whole game was fucked up!

Look again, 04:12 Heidemann was almost 1meter behind the line, and look the judge's hands, Heidemann moves AFTER hands move to start.

​@@cesargarridov These 2:40 2:44 4:12 are the three matches in 0.920 sec. The two players must be at a distance that the swords do not touch each other when they stretch their arms and swords. In the original video, the judge instructed the German player to step back, but the German player still stood close and the judge just started the match in all the three matches. And look at 2:40. The player must move after hearing the judge says 'Allez'. The German player moved before the judge said it. You can clearly see it with x0.25 speed.

@@Lee_Ji-hoon why are you looking at 2:40 and not 4:12?

@@elmo4979 These 2:40 2:44 4:12 are the three matches in the last 0.920 sec. Each match takes some time out of the 0.920sec. They are all important.

tradition.... the sport from the 1700's...

I'm starting to think that the timekeeper was named "Siri"

It's NOT about affordability. It's just the fencing folks are old-dated. Now they have milliseconds clocks now

@@HusseinDoha I bet fencing didn't include fancy suits in the past...

it was more tradition than anything else... appears it might have changed now.. things usually change when there is controversy.... but at that time - them was the rules...

How do they launder money?

too sad that Shin has to be a first victim of a tradition of fencing

It was a fair win..she played by the rules.

actually it is fairer than winning by being drawn.

@@varrjames186 However by the rules, the match ended before she got touched. Let's add 1 second to every other time based competitions from now on so it's fair !!! Use your brain.

@@hansimgluck6789 Eh, I agree that they're should be another way to determine who wins rather than just winning by a draw, but the point is the game lasted for extra seconds

@@Osirion16 I'll say it again...it was a fair win because she followed the rules and did not play unfairly. The match hadn't ended before she got touched. Use your brain.

@@fynnoleianson8802 They don't have to, but they also don't have to not say that they're german.

@@fynnoleianson8802 blame the crackheads that always say "Oh, you're just complaining because your [name specific race here] lost." It's a really annoying argument to come across and i've seen it happen multiple times, therefore this is a counter to that type of argument.

@@fynnoleianson8802 It's an increasingly required preliminary defence to stupid counterpoints.

@@fynnoleianson8802 agreed

Agreed. The referee and the timekeeper bear sole responsibility for this.

@@derdon8927 priority switches during a match, like offense and defense in american football. only reason she didn't have priority is because she wasn't good enough and kept getting countered. that's all apart of the rules of the sport. the only thing that was unfair was the advantage of extra time given to the german even though she already lost.

Der Don priority switches if the person without priority scores. Fencing is centuries old and changing a core rule would be wrong.

@@goastlyarrowplays It is sudden death if the person without priority scores its over

@@derdon8927 shin was assigned priority, and she fenced very well using the priority, but then heiddeman was given an extra second that shouldn't have been given because the literal rules were that heiddeman had [this] much time to score a point (which she failed to do) and then heiddeman was given an advantage that wasn't even specified in the rules to start with and completely unforeseen.

It is not that the Olympic doesn't have them, as much as they were not used in fencing. Even in sabre -out of big tournaments- the clock is not even used. You only get a 1min break after one fencer reaches 8 points.

Germany, apparantley.

Jeen Lee german lady enjoyed the win

Just like the Korean fencer would have, so what?

The Germans apparently.

Well, on the other hand, who wants to win or lose randomly? That's what the priority rule is, and to me it seems even more stupid than the clock that can't be reset to the nearest millisecond...

it doesn't work tat way... there is only 1 (ONE) gold..... for an event.... it is a pretty big acheivement to get silver anyway

this was a semifinal, not a match for gold yet

Both?! Nah the Korean girl should have been the winner

Korean one should be the one getting the gold, but if you want to be as fair as possible to the other girl the match should have been repeated.

@@dnch what

maine x no one cares

Rory Abc 123 Clearly you do.

Plorin nah don’t and no one actually does

Rory Abc 123 Then why’d you comment? You care.

Plorin no one could care less about a school race I was saying there’s no need to comment that

Piste

Mistergunz _ same. I'm not a fencing fan but I'm pissed also

Maybe this just gave me a reason to hate Olympics because of how unprofessional the decision was.

Nah, it shouldn't. The winner deserved that win. The priority rule is stupid. Adding random chance to an olympic sport, and something so purely skill based is stupid.

Same, I’m an epee fencer and this is just terrible.

epic 🤣😂😂

epic anime techniques

they did, on the last ten seconds the clocks now show the tenth and hundredth of a second remaining

Blame also lies on the ref...she didn't enforce proper distance when they were resetting. You only have a 40 millisecond window for a double touch, and even being 6 inches closer (both fencers were crowding, but Britta was more at fault there) often means the diff between a single and a double hit at this level of epee. Of course, it could be argued that if Lam had scored one or 2 more hits earlier, it would've been moot -- time runs out often in foil or epee bouts -- but the ref did Lam no favors, nor did the timekeeper at a critical moment with a guaranteed medal on the line.

Are you kidding? Priority is bullshit. She won fair and square.

Fencers crowd....ref says "distance, distance"...fencers back off....Britta immediately steps forward again...ref doesn't enforce proper distance. Britta is now too close and Lam has nowhere to go.

sam signorelli +1 complete BS

I know! I wanted to hug her so badly :(

Not a Korean attitude. Could have been considered belittling her.

because coach was sentenced labor punishment in a coal mine

sergio rm0 shes south korean, literally a country with higher level of human development than the US lol

They did after the match...relax.

Yess....... totally a reference.

Wouldn't be even remotely surprised.

The power of time and luck was on her side, plus it was super clean hit

Yes Si it doesn’t have to “super clean” it just has to be a hit. Also it was a inexcusable mistake, the incorrect call, and they knew it was incorrect and gave her a huge advantage.

How?

If it was rigged wouldn't it just be much easier to give the German priority?

non-fencers like you who try to critisize the system are really funny and stupid.

Why does the priority rule exist though? Im genuinely wondering.

wouldnt it be fairer if they would add on another minute if it still remains a draw, or after the normal time go to golden point

thats not for you to decide, its up to the FIE

Zhang Why not give priority from the first touch of the match or something? Is there really value in the coin flip?

@@user-sw2hx5iqk5c ㄹㅇㅋㅋ 상대선수보단 심판 ㅈ같은건 다 기억하긴 하지

아 시각 좀 넓히자 국내따리 시끼들아 신아람 1초는 한국버전이고 하이데만, 금메달의 멍에 또는 밑에 말대로 펜싱 오심, 올림핀 불명예가 더 먹히지 내가 왜 영어로 썼겠냐 영어권에서 먹히는 말을 한거다 영어 배울때 의역을 왜 배우겠냐

@@user-sw2hx5iqk5c 눈치 ㅈㄴ 없나

it's randomly picked, what would a better way to settle it be?

@@pengo2 I forgot everything so idk

@@pengo2 Sudden death? Next single hit wins.

@@Atombender I think saber does this, but I don't really know anything about it

@@Atombender you have NO idea how long and boring that would make the game

no, she wasn't it seems... if you watch the whole bout she strangely creeps up each time the bout is halted... gaining ground that she shouldnt have .. not sure if she would of been over the line if she hadn't done this though....

you can't be robbed of something you don't have

I mean no. In the end Heidemann was the better fencer.

she had Luck that she had the Prio

Luck that she had priority.

Boo 😒

@@vivekvarghese your hatred makes me stronger

@@vivekvarghese hey at least he tries. Some people just don't bother with being entertaining.

@@vivekvarghese Bee

hardly.... her coach appealed against the decision and that appeal was rejected....

@@albertbresca5801 are you daft

@@albertbresca5801 if the coach appeals that the officials just started adding more time to the clock for no good reason whatsoever while shin was in position to basically guarantee a win, and korea appealed, and it was rejected, would that be fine? Because I literally just described what happened in this match. Shin shouldn't be punished for the timekeeper being a dunce.

@@carrots7216 no there was nothing they could have done differently. Their was time on the clock before the referee let it run out so they had to put time back on the clock.

@@officerwizz and otherwise heidemann would have robbed aswell there was time on the clock so they had to put time back on the clock nothing to appeal for.

Super sad. Super duper sad. What a disgrace

Blue Pepper Yeah, but the video said that the lowest the clock could go to was 1 full second, so the timekeeper wouldn’t have been able to set it to 200 milliseconds anyway.

It was the timekeepers fault. Ref asked timekeeper to check time and they let the clock run down. Timekeeper didn't do their job right

@Blue Pepper it's the referee's fault.

white color sports

Nah that makes too much sense.

@@bboygenetics9882 XD

they had no clue how much time had passed when it was happening, its not that simple lol

@@swer9112 they could've just looked back at the live recording and see how many milliseconds there was instead of resetting it to 1 sec

@@swer9112 the entire thing is recorded and broadcast around the world, im sure they could've pulled up the match in seconds to count how long it remained at 1 second for.

False win? You mean in accordance with International Fencing rules set out by the Fédération Internationale d'Escrime? Yeah right LMAO

@@swagcube5050 in no sport and I mean NO SPORT, time is added to the timer That is complete BS. Give me one reason why 0.2 should be changed to 1.0.

@@shadownin1188 That is absolutely right. But there is also no reason the clock should be changed to 0. The officials are to blame not the athletes.

O but the priority rule is ok or what?!

@@LupiZweier the priority rule maybe BS but it is still the RULE. While time add is not in the rules.

They got their revenge now ⚽

NihilisticEntropy nihilistic entropy. LoL.

south korea has had a lot of down to the wire events in it's history, they're practically built on them.

they world number 1 now lol

NihilisticEntropy Erm, they’re one of the world’s economic leaders, I don’t think you can simply trash talk them like that.

It's not a stupid rule. It's there to discourage the fencers from being too passive and to determine who wins once the extra time is done. You cant have them fencing for an endless amount of time. At some point the bout needs to end with a winner. Hence priority. The rule is fine, and both fencers have the same chance to gain priority and to score that touch.

while it has reason, it is an unfair rule. your situation, whether in advantage or in disadvantage situation, is determined by a random generator or coin toss, not by their performance, which isn't fair at all.

Christian Albert Jahns: You dont seem to understand what the definition of "fair" is. Maybe you should look it up.

+DeusExAstra To preface this, I do not know much about fencing; however, the rule can be unfair even if it is applied equally. The extreme example is if every match were decided by random number generator. Obviously, that system is incredibly silly and unfair. The unfairness comes from the fact that every competitive game should be decided on the basis of who is the better competitor, unimpeded by random external factors. Despite all of this, I do sympathize with the idea that the bout does need to end, but wish that there was a different rule that could fix the problem.

DeusExAstra but the priority rule is randomly picking a winner if time runs out. Although each person has the same chance of gaining priority they have no control over who gets it

Adil R i agree that wasn’t good sportsmanship at all

I don’t really do it when I fence. But a lot of people do. It’s not offensive, they are just letting all there stress out with a scream.

It's not lack of class. She was just extremely happy that she won. It's a normal reaction that she can't control. You smile when you're happy and you cry when you're sad. That's why Shin was crying. She was sad and crying is not something she can control

Rebecca Greenwood I have seen very little people that can’t control their emotions in elite sports. There is no doubt that winning the finals would that be a great moment but at least have some basic human decency.

@@rebeccagreenwood3302 I'm a fencer, and if I won this way, it would bother me. Because I'd never be sure I deserve it.

Soccer?

Soccer.

@@toxicstarbot6701 In soccer/football, it goes to extra time and penalties if a winner needs to be decided in a knockout match. That's how you decide a winner. Giving a fair chance to both teams. Unlike in fencing where random chance is the decider.

@@gokulhemanthkumar4556 I do fencing. I know the issue personally. And I agree with you, yet I think it's kind of makes it more interesting. Like a game. Suddenly you are forced to shift from defense to attack or vice versa, depending on your style. In an official tournament sure it makes little sense, but in practices, it adds a new layer to the game. Also, in chess white also have a slight advantage. I was on this tournament in Istanbul, we had this 2 girls fence with 20 seconds left on the clock for almost 15 minutes. It was both hilarious and tiring. Say thanks at all. Old fencing watch (linked to your blade directly to register a hit), would restart a second every time you hit. Some matches with 1 second could have lasted up to half an hour.

@@piglitlol what soccer are you playing?

shin should have lost as she kept stepping forward after each hit... not sure why that was never picked up... in fencing you stay where the hit was scored.. and if you step behind the line with both feet - lose the hit...

@@albertbresca8904 Oh thanks for telling that I just realised it now lol! 😂🤣🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾

its not absurd.

@@santiagoferrari1973 of course it is. One fencer is randomly given the win should the score be a draw. How is that fair?

@@eepyautumn totally agree. when i first heard that i was like huh????!!!!

And how does one measure 0.8 seconds on a clock which only moves by 1 sec?

I'm guessing the clocks stops electronically by the fencers' gear when there is a hit. The clock can't do it and a human can't strike at exactly 0.8 so you're left with an impossible feat.

But then surely if the clocks stop automatically when hit, if the German lady had hit after 0.2 seconds, then the Korean should have won.

They didn't think of that. A pressure of the moment and such. As others have said here in the comments, they should have canceled that match and do a do-over

The problem with that isn't so much the clocks but the fencer's ability to know the ACTUAL time remaining in this situation. A clock that shows 2 seconds might only have 1.1 left, but because the time hasn't reached 1, a fencer would still think there were 2 left...an eternity in a weapon with a lock-out time of only 40 milliseconds (for the non-fencers, lock-out here means the box blocking a hit from one fencer registering -- and a hit MUST register on the box in order to be counted to considered -- if that hit lands a specific time AFTER the other fencer's hit registers. In epee it's 40 ms, in sabre 170 ms, in foil 300 ms). Not all scoring boxes sold have time or score keeping capabilities, but those that do now tend show more detailed time in the last 10 seconds of a period...once the clock runs down to 10, you start seeing 9.9, 9.8, etc. Had that kind of clock been in place at the London Games, it would've changed how Lam and Heidmann fenced the last few seconds, because they can see the clocks.

dude she won, Shin should have made a better counter

Ima agree with Jacob. Clearly she didn't care by the end on the count of she thought she was going to get away with being lazy. So, Much like a child who had their toys taken away she sat cried and tried to make people feel sorry for her laziness failing, which sadly it worked. She still lost however.

I bet you guys applaud a boxer who knocks a guy out after the bell, too.

that would be a disqualification. the timer is the only time that counts

Yes. And when an Olympic official adds time to a clock that is not called for by the rules, that's called corruption.

You call God's name then concluded with a profanity are you holy or not?

Reaching priority minute isn't entirely common (much less than 50%) even in epee, and both fencers train extensively for the situation where they have or don't have priority. It's similar to whoever gets to serve first in tennis - somebody has to have the priority as it's a boolean. In this case, Shin as actually outclassing Bretta by getting doubles so efficiently - not many fencers could deliberately hold the World Champ in priority minute. It was Shin's game plan to go for doubles, and she succeeded (until the end).

Jasper Rehkämper The rule isn’t stupid, there needs to be a winner regardless of what happens especially in a sport where every millisecond counts. In this case the priority winner is truly random with no bias included, it’s not unfair since equal amounts of effort are required both to Attack and counter attack. Also the fact you mentioned that a widely known and acknowledged rule is more unfair than an idiotic decision/turnout shows your ignorance to a sport that’s been around longer than your great grand parents were a concept shows your complete ignorance. Games and sports have rules and if you can’t accept those rules than follow another sport.

@@christopherbertoli7322 They have a lot of fencing before the priority rule even comes into effect. So if they even let it come down to a coin flip it's their own fault. Both know the rules going in. Priority is a known rule. Randomly adding time to rig the game in favor of one competitor is not a rule.

@@nthgod "Sports have rules, if you can't accept them, follow another sport" What kind of stupid argument is that. If there is a rule that is unfair to a party (which is what priority is) then the rule shouldn't exist. I'm sure there is a better way to determine priority, or just introduce a golden hit or something. Also, yes it is unfair, because one player has to register more hits than the other to win.

U be surprised of how many rules in sports can have rabdom "advantages" In chess, white pawn is commonly know for being favourable and having higher winrate And u guess it, some rules decide players sides by random In football, UCL uses away goals advantage If u think its to negate "home court advantage" then NBA playoff can have teams playing a decisive match in their home court based on randomness Thats just quick example that i can quickly get out from my head Here, rules exist for a reason and players within a game is trained specifically for it Some of this seemingly "unfair" rules can and will make the games a lot more interesting and innovative Personally, idk why fencing uses this random rules but im not surprised

traditional fencing

It only goes down in full seconds too

@@aimeemcdonald1581 no it clearly stops at decimals or else it wouldn’t have stopped at .2 in the first place. They should have run the clock as if .8 was zero, and see where the next hit stops it. Edit: y’all stop liking my comment I was wrong lmao 😆

Spencer Geerlings the Olympic clock didn’t show 0.2 though. If you look at the bottom of the screen, it shows the Olympic clock, which only goes up or down in full seconds. A lot of people in the comments aren’t understanding. Obviously, there was not a full second remaining, but the clocks they had could not register anything less than a second. The KZfaq video has put an additional green clock on screen but that is not the Olympic one

@@aimeemcdonald1581 ahh, I see what you’re saying. So the green is just arbitrary numbers for the effect

@@aisu8481 not entirely, the green clock shows the time that is actually remaining from the original 1sec. So it's not random.

It was over one hour for the korean athlete

traditional fencing... in 1 second increments.... they have timers that go to the milli second... BUT fencing traditionally was in 1 second increments.... strange though the ref. never picked her up on creeping up.. after every double hit lam stepped forward when she should have started with 1 foot behind the line... strange the ref. letter her get away with it.... each time....