Concordo! Anche io avevo 10 anni...

I was born in 1975 but I am polish...Yes . It was great performance

It was 100% a regular goal!

And he denied Germany a clear penalty later in the game. What could have made it 4-1. Maybe he was unsure to give it because the first penalty wasn't that clear. And to be fair, a 4-1 wouldn't have shown the whole story of the match.

​@@BroncoRob True. And the Netherlands were probably the best side of that WC. But it's good in fact to point out that Germany's final victory wasn't a lucky one but well-deserved!

@@stefanwagner1424 If Poland had played Holland in the final with a fully fit team I would have taken them to win by the odd goal in three.

@@gunternetzer9621 It would have been a great match for sure. Both teams were the best sides in that World Cup. That said, though, the German final victory against the Netherlands wasn't only a lucky one but one not undeserved in a thrilling match. And it often happens that the best teams in a tournament don't necessarily win the tournament. Otherwise, in 1966 or 1982, for example, Germany and Brazil, respectively, ought to have won.

😂 equal performance like cameroonian J.A. Bell in the first and second match of his team in USA1994😂

And the Dutch goalkeeper in the final (add Müller's goal)

Да я тоже😁.

... making Scotland the only unbeaten team.

Westdeutschland verlor absichtlich weil sie als Gruppenzweiter in die leichtere Zwischengruppe kommen konnten (mit Schweden, Jugoslawien, Polen), während Ostdeutschland als Erster in die schwerere Zwischengruppe kam (Niederlande, Brasilien, Argentinien). Früher waren solche Rechenspiele und Pläne noch einfacher möglich als heutzutage. Man glaubt doch nicht ernsthaft dass die Weltmeister werden und alle anderen schlagen, aber dann ausgerechnet die DDR nicht packen könnten...

Tschik Tschaikowsky named him "kleines, dickes Gerd" 😅

Brazil has never been known for blowing out opponents at World Cups! They are usually satisfied with 3, 4 or 5 goals. There is really no point in going beyond that at the professional level especially if the game is under control. No need to embarrass your opponent.

yugoslavia was good team 74

It is usually European teams that love blowing out their opponents (Just Fontaine, Müller, etc.)

yes

@@Ometecuhtli Don't forget Hungary and Puskas

in uk it was 1966 england where the hosts won the world cup

Hellstrom - Garcia, Luiz Pereira/Beckenbauer/Breitner - Mazzola/Deyna/Cruyff - Lato/Muller/Gadocha

(click on translate): Westdeutschland verlor absichtlich weil sie als Gruppenzweiter in die leichtere Zwischengruppe kommen konnten (mit Schweden, Jugoslawien, Polen), während Ostdeutschland als Erster in die schwerere Zwischengruppe kam (Niederlande, Brasilien, Argentinien). Früher waren solche Rechenspiele und Pläne noch einfacher möglich als heutzutage. Man glaubt doch nicht ernsthaft dass die Weltmeister werden und alle anderen schlagen, aber dann ausgerechnet die DDR nicht packen könnten...

Jersey rules were not that strict that time. You could play all white whole while the opponent team was wearing white shorts and socks as long as the jersey had another colour. A few years ago in the German cup final RB Leipzig was the designated home team and wore white jerseys, red shorts and red socks and Bayern München as the designated away team wore red jerseys, white shorts and white socks. Bayern also had the option playing in all black as their 3rd kit but the ref allowed it because Bayern wanted to promote their new home kit.

I don't think anyone is going to confuse someone with a white jersey and red shorts with someone wearing a red jersey and white shorts. But in Italy 90 Argentina had white shorts and white and blue jerseys and couldn't use it against Germany as they're the designated "home" team.

@@Ometecuhtli Orange and red shirts are a bit of a clash but in this tournament a lot of teams played in their second strip without any real need to.

È già tanto che abbia giocato nel 1970, si era già ritirato dalla Nazionale dopo il 1966. Figuriamoci se aveva ancora voglia e stimoli nel 1974...

@@marcogoeni6052 ma un vero campione può giocare ad alti livelli fino ai 40 anni ..di esempi ne abbiamo..

@@denisdegaspari9723 evidentemente lui non era in grado. Già fu in dubbio per il 1970. Non è detto che se un giocatore è forte giochi fino a 40 anni, ci sono esempi di giocatori che hanno smesso a 30. Andando in Usa fu sommerso di $ e perse ogni altro stimolo.

@@marcogoeni6052 ma nel 7o è stato un mostro poi....stacchi di testa assurdi.....ma se voleva x me,poteva venire sia in Europa a finire ,ma a fine carriera si va a raccimolare ,invece adesso ci vanno da giovani è il contrario....tutti in Arabia adesso,prima in Cina e Giappone,e nei 70 80 tutti negli usa come cruyff Beckenbauer chinaglia ecc...purtroppo il denaro attira di più ,delle competizioni importanti ...il treno passa una volta sola,guardi in Arabia adesso c'è squadre da Champions tra un po'!!🙏😅

Nie jestem taki pewien, czy Lubański to zbawca, ale to świetny piłkarz... myślę, że mogło tak nie lać w stutgarcie jak graliśmi z Niemcami, albo mogli mecz przełożyć, to była kopanina po błocie, i mieli minimalnie więcej farta.... ale to wystarczyło... bo to była też świetna drużyna...

@@bdmonster8250 Lubański obok Deyny był najlepszym polskim piłkarzem. Półkę lepszym od Laty czy Szarmacha etc Miałem szczęście rozmawiać z wieloma ludźmi, którzy widzieli na żywo jeszcze Gerarda Cieślika..., także... Co nie zmienia faktu, że może i masz rację w tym że synergia tamtej ekipy była niesamowita i być może z tym wybitnym Lubańskim graliby wbrew pozorom gorzej...

With a fully fit team they could have won it with Andrzej Szarmach. He and Deyna were not fully fit for the S/F and 3rd/4th Place PO.

@@czaszaprzeszly371 Z w pełni sprawnym zespołem mogli go wygrać z Andrzejem Szarmachem. On i Deyna nie byli w pełni zdolni do S/F i 3/4 miejsca PO. Mieli lepszych napastników niż Holandia, a Szarmach był prawdziwym środkowym napastnikiem, w przeciwieństwie do Cruyffa, a Lato był lepszy od Rep.

@@bdmonster8250 Z w pełni sprawnym zespołem mogli go wygrać z Andrzejem Szarmachem. On i Deyna nie byli w pełni zdolni do S/F i 3/4 miejsca PO. Mieli lepszych napastników niż Holandia, a Szarmach był prawdziwym środkowym napastnikiem, w przeciwieństwie do Cruyffa, a Lato był lepszy od Rep.