I would be buying tickets to see that

@@erinbathie-moore8478 lol same

With my sleep schedule yeah I would go as much as I could

@@Leafgal XD

Yeah and next to the coast to Costa Rica, it's probably the only daytime when it's not unbearably hot. Also the Singapore zoo has a whole large section for only nighttime, and thousands of people go there.

MatPat is a brain burner!(Правдивое видео):..... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a6qVhNmltrjdnXU.html

There’s also All Tommorows, an interpretation of the evolution of human and human like animals over a billion years in the future. It’s really interesting to read, albeit a bit creepy!

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/b7h_rc12nc-ogIk.html Finally it's here

Some people were normal one moment then turned into ad zombies, click their pfp look at their previous comments and now look at them

What is wrong with this comment section?

Yeah

Dr. Henry Wu tells that on the first book in a conversation with Hammond

@@hp19power34 yeah I had to reread it to remember that lol

​@@hp19power34 he even says something similar in Jurassic World as well.

Both the books and the movies categorically state multiple times that they’re not real dinosaurs, simply Frankenstein monsters grown a lab. They are effectively chimeras really.

Bacteria have as many generations per day as humans have had since the Toba Eruption. T. Rex is closer to us than to Triceratops. Let that sink in...

True

If we ever resurrected any non-avian dinosaurs, they’d HAVE to be genetically modified to be able to survive

ha what i thought when in Jurassic park 6 the talk like ancient locust had a super immune system but if i start complaining about jurasic park 6 we can talk al day

War of the Worlds By: H.G. Wells

Yes I've escaped to for a snac xcoughx oh no dinogod its toxic out here please let me back in oh no I think I'm gonna throw up. This would be almost all the dinosaurs

@@Joshua-qh1bz insert Patrick screaming *WHAT KIND OF PLACE IS THIS?! *

@@Joshua-qh1bz "DINOS NEVER EXISTED!!" Did you, fellow Theorist, know many deny Science or that Dinos ever existed and then get covered by Atheist-KZfaqrs, who deal with Science-Denial allll the time? The End-Product fused Fun and Science, so why not go and watch if you like Matpat? Oh, and the whole Calroie-Thing matt tackled at the start here was once roasted by 'Terrible Writing Advice'.

@@loturzelrestaurant hi I understand the rest and I do watch matpat but elaborate the calroie thing?

@@Joshua-qh1bz The Calorie-Topic covered at the Start of this video. This whole 'Its kindaaa unlogical that a Great Animal would chase after the hardest-to-get Prey'.

the idea and discovery of feathered dinosaurs was made (or not very common knowledge) at the time the first Jurassic Park movie was made so after that they stuck to their dinosaur species that were in that first movie looking how they did in that movie for the rest (with the exception of 3 but we can forget that train wreck)

Also Dinosaurs like the Tyrannosaurus probably didn't have feathers.

I dont know if matpat explained this, but in-universe they never got 100% complete dna dinosaurs and have to patched it with other animals dna, makes sense they dont have feathers since its not complete

@@fikrijuanda6321Yeahh he mentioned that they mixed it with frogs DNA so it may explain it

They didn't have feathers because they aren't dinosaurs. They are chimeric combinations of DNA slapped together until they looked like what the geneticists thought dinosaurs should look like.

Agreed, they need some Utahraptors.

I thought the raptor we cashed velociraptor was an actual Utah Raptor? Meaning we did get the Utah Raptor 😅😂

@@Noah-bi4ll it was a deinonychus a utah would be way too big for those "velociraptors"

and the "velociraptor" skeletohnn we see was at the same place as the deinonychus was discovered so we are pretty sure its a deinonychus

Aren't most people also awake at this time point?

I know I would! I mean, I'm still gettin to see dinosaurs, and actual dinosaurs at that!

It would be hard to see them

I dont think there is a animal called "raptor chickens".

"DINOS NEVER EXISTED!!" Did you, fellow Theorist, know many deny Science or that Dinos ever existed and then get covered by Atheist-KZfaqrs, who deal with Science-Denial allll the time? The End-Product fused Fun and Science, so why not go and watch if you like Matpat? Oh, and the whole Calorie-Thing matt tackled at the start here was once roasted by 'Terrible Writing Advice'.

Jurrasic park? Awesome oxygen consumption does modify there temperature in the enviroment

Yeh, its genetics that's the problem

very true

Well the whole point of the episode is how the park would look like if the dinosaurs weren't genetically modified what's your point

The book explains literally everything here including that, actually explaining tagt they DIDNT, and that the dinosaurs were dying and not living wel in the new envierent

Ikr.

Hear me out: "Dinosaur" includes two groups of creatures, saurischians and ornithischians. If you broadened the term enough to include pterosaurs, you would still include only pterosaurs, saurischians, ornithischians, and some basal dinosaurs that unify saurischians and ornithischians, strictly within the middle Triassic period. As soon as you go forward in time to the point where you could tell saurischians apart from ornthischians, there would be no members of this group besides pterosaurs, saurischians and ornithischians. What I'm saying is that the exclusion of "pterosaurs" from "dinosaurs" is purely arbitrary.

Are you also mad that they are presented as having scaly skin when we now are discovering they might have been more feathery?

The "Jurassic" part is most likely put there to invoke memories of "Jurassic Park".

@@lockskelington314 Except it's sort of old. obsolete news that dinosaurs had feathers. Those dinosaurs that were most closely related to birds had feathers. But even T-Rexes, which are among the most closely related to birds, didn't. Turns out that quills are a basal trait to dinosaurs, so they pop up in various, diverse forms here and there. But as dinosaurs became enormous, their purpose for feathers (insulation) was solved by their sheer size. So few lineages of dinosaurs apart from birds' kept them. Psitticosaurs (ancestral to triceratops) had quills related to feathers, but they weren't very "feathery." A huge carnivore, concavenator, had feathers. Ornithomimus and therazinosaurs, also distantly related to birds were also huge and had feathers.

Facts. Honestly the tour would've gone off without a hitch. Sure there was a tropical storm bearing down but as far as we're aware, the storm itself didn't affect the power grid, that was all Nedry. Hammond had no reason to feel like he was gonna lose his endorsement of the park unless a CATASTROPHIC malfunction occurred like we saw in the movie.

Next time when you "spare no expense", pay your programmer better.

@@khatdubell lmao yeah, have more than a single IT guy running the place. Underpaid, overworked, basically slave labour. No wonder that dude fucked over the company.

@@khatdubell how bout get a better programer? I don’t know how nedry got that job with the disrespect he shows to Jhon Hammond

@@bluecoconut9543 he was the lowest bidder. Literally. That’s how he got the job. That’s sort of my point. They don’t go into it in the movie, but that is what the whole conversation between them was about. There is a detailed analysis of it on KZfaq if you’re really interested.

Yeah. They’ve also stated how the accuracies have changed since the newer finds on what the dinos looked like in later installments, stating that, lore-wise, the dinos were attractions and were desired to be more thrilling than realistical, so they stayed similar looking.

This is why I hate the paleontology community, y’all will not let the smallest of mistakes go

Big one I liked about Jurassic Park was the Tyrannosaurus' posture.

*Except for Dilo. At least in the movies.

I would also like to add that the velicoraptors in the films are more close to dakatoraptors, another dromaeosaurid, which hasn't been discovered to be with or without feathers with most paleontologists assuming such due to other raptors having them. Tyrannosaurus is only theorized, so no evidence of such, to have sparsed feathers as 2 large tyrannosaurs were discovered one without feathers and one completely feathered. so only really the dilophosaurus, the raptors and spinosaurus(back in '03 spino would be considered 100% accurate) are the most scientifically inaccurate dinosaurs that were shown in the films as the rest just have small details such as arm ordination or size.

Actually some apes are smarter than 10yo kids. I've watched some documentaries about it, also even some cats and dogs are very smart and make complex decisions. For example check out "Billispeaks" channel (it's about a cat with extremely high intelligence and understanding of human words). There's another one called "CatmanJohn". I also saw a video of ape being able to understand what a handsaw is, without previously have seen anyone use it. They were making tests and just left a saw in reach of an ape, he picked it up and tried to cut a branch off tree with it, ovbiously not as effective as human, but he clearly understood what it's for and how to use it, he was trying to move it back and forth by adding force, but it often got stuck as he didn't properly hold the branch down. My point .. apes and other animals can often figure things out without having seen them done before. Considering that King Kong was superiour to other apes, I'd say he is/was more intelligent than average humans nowdays (not a joke). Nowdays most humans are so dumb that they don't even know how to change tyre on their car (I have seen people trying to use duct tape to fix car tyres...).

Ok idc

Yes, absolutely, you're right. And I also wonder where cloned dinosaurs would aquire the necessary gut bacteria which they need to digest plant material. All the beneficial microbes they evolved with have propably been gone for millions of years.

Saying grass didnt exist in the Mesozoic, is actually incorrect. It just wasn't widespread like today. My understanding is grasses evolved in India around 100 mya.

@@mitchellskene8176 that still leave quite a part of mesozoic as grass-less.

@@Lyokoheros-KLPXTV Indeed it does,!! That said, the misconception that grass didn't exist during the Mesozoic needs to be put to bed, in my opinion.

@@rabenherz1860 I like your pfp

So it was basically saying "Mine!"

Malcolm did get bit the the trex and it broke his leg in the books. It didn't eat him.

@@lazer2521 Same in the movie. The lawyer was the one who got eaten.

​@lazer2521 I don't think the Rex even bit him, it just sort of rammed him with its nose and sent him flying. It's a T Rex, if it bit his leg that leg is gone.

@Gladeous: I only do that when my comments are too long or I somehow can't edit again. Yeah, I know it's weird. I don't know what's going on but after editing about like uh three or four times I can't do it anymore. The option is still there but nothing happens ;-;

@Gladeous Imagine caring about something so pointless.

Oxygen isn't the only constraint to size. How dinosaur respiration systems are built is fundamentally different than mammals. They have a 1 way through respiration system with air sacs, allowing them to inhale and exhale at the same time. Our mammalian lungs are actually less efficient, because we don't exhale all air from our lungs when we breath out, and always leaving behind a bit of old air. Combining their more efficient respiration system with hollow bones that weight less, and being "mesotherms" so they don't cook themselves with their body heat allows them to be bigger.

You're grossly overestimating the difference in atmosphere, it's a minuscule change between the eras. A modern dino would survive fine, and if you were to be back in time you'd be breathing healthily too. Furthermore, downy feathers have been discovered all throughout avemetatarsalia (the group containing pterosaurs and dinosaurs).

They mention it in the novel when they talk about a sick stegosaurus that has labored breathing

I would be really ridiculous if someone here in the comment section knew about a speculative biology project called "neocene"

is there an All Today's?

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gr9le5hoxt3bf5c.html Finally it's here YES.

@@rubixloverful yes

​@@rubixloverful yes there is

nice research! few people check after seeing these vids

For all the apparent research that is done for these theories, a surprisingly large number of them have fundamental/obvious mistakes :'C

@@syindrome well if You say so You can always make another channel when You would discuss them ;)

Though T rex probably didn’t as she was simply too big

Heck there were dinosaurs that lived their lives, even thrived in the Arctic. So they didn't just live in hot environments. Their habitats were as varied as the dinosaur species themselves.

I need to read those

Don't forget how they had a whole little seminar about how they spliced in frog DNA. It's Crichton, not Creighton.

that's not actually true, in Jurassic world 2 and Jurassic world evolution it's explained that the velociraptors were found to be very intelligent despite their size so the scientists decided to drastically increase their size for what was basically a fun science experiment to see what they would be capable of with a larger body. also back then paleologists genuinely thought velociraptors grew to those sizes.

​@@flameofmage1099 They are good. Michael Crichton can be a dry read sometimes but almost all of his books have a base in reality and science. Some like Andromeda Strain are actually scarier the more you realize the solid science behind the core idea.

@@michaelludlow626 No. They're referrencing the original book, which is decades older than anything in the World spinoffs. Also, no, paleontologists did NOT think that velociraptors grew that big. They already knew they were about big turkey size. Other dromaeosaurs grew that large or larger but velociraptors did not and we knew it.

Last fight kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mLqPeMJ_vMu5kYU.html

But having a larger brain doesn’t make it smarter, it’s "intelligence" may have even been less with a larger brain since the neurons that enable brain activity would be farther spread out.

Brain size doesn't always indicate intelligence. Look at tiktok users for example

@@act2wasstronger182 do you think that those people have a brain?

@@gdottothegamer1001 maybe a miniscule, smooth one??

MatPat is a brain burner!(Правдивое видео):... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a6qVhNmltrjdnXU.html

@@foop2954 they most likely weren’t since there was no need of it

Not slightly,no feathers on t.rex

Is that even a correction? That just sounds like additional info.

Then I wouldn’t be able to go to the time district of the dinosaurs because I have asthma

Third*

Same

KZfaq is quick to censor comments that don't tow the line but these scammers are everywhere.🙄

Third

Third movie.

Then you would have Jurassic Park. You already know how that pans out.

Wouldnt they also adapt to earths environment as they grow up?

Thats literally the movie. You paying attention? Lol

@@FATHERJAMES no.

@@FATHERJAMES some would but many could die

@Don't Read My Profile Photo I won’t

So many bots…

Amazing it seems bots have multiplied in the comment section

We are gonna have real dinos in 2025

Dude there’s gonna be real dinos in 2025

In the novels it actually is a very big theme that is mentioned often. The movies didn't explicitly address it that much though

@@jacksonknoll5350 camp cretaceous and the books mention it A LOT. Yeah you're right.

Plus, they got its body shape and habitat wrong.

@@pineforest1442 Along with size, strength, etc.

"DINOS NEVER EXISTED!!" Did you, fellow Theorist, know many deny Science or that Dinos ever existed and then get covered by Atheist-KZfaqrs, who deal with Science-Denial allll the time? The End-Product fused Fun and Science, so why not go and watch if you like Matpat? Oh, and the whole Calroie-Thing matt tackled at the start here was once roasted by 'Terrible Writing Advice'.

I have to say, today and yesterday sure has been some pretty strange days. First I see dozens of different channel having paleontologists taking a look at dinosaur movie clips in the same day, then I see the trailers for Prehistoric plant and now this. I'm definitely feeling a resurgence in dinosaur related content. Maybe it's because of the recent release of the new Jurassic world movie though I'm honestly not sure.

@@incognitodon5779 They never said what time the carnotaurus was at. So how could they be wrong?

@@incognitodon5779 The documentary Hops between different places of the world at different points in the late Cretaceous

@@incognitodon5779 are you sure there’s no misunderstanding about what they said? I mean that’s such a stupid mistake.

@@incognitodon5779 also Carnotaurus lived about 83.5 to 66 million years ago. Therefore if the Show only took place 66 million years ago there is no issue With Carnotaurus being there.

Yes we need more all tommrows

I saw a video on this and it was so interesting. The snake people are definitely my favorite

Terrifying.

I absolutely love that story

@Beast 😈 2 Don’t you mean uploading the same short over and over again?

MatPat is a brain burner!(Правдивое видео):.... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a6qVhNmltrjdnXU.html

Last fight kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mLqPeMJ_vMu5kYU.html

These bots....

@@thekingofyellow5811 yeah they are in the replies of literally all of the comments idk why they even do it

had feather pubes

All Today's is a section within All Yesterday's

The reply's to this comment are a ROLLER COASTER!

We might not be talking about a time machine solution of transplantation, but complete molecular reconstruction seems a bit farfetched to me. Sure, if we were creating a new iteration of dinosaur for the modern era, adaption would come naturally to some extent, but when talking about bringing old dinosaurs into the modern era, we need something to work off of as a baseline. There is a limit to how far we could modify a dinosaur before it no longer resembles the original goal of scientific discovery and study. We arent trying to hatch a dino egg, we are trying to create a dino to create the egg. "born" into the modern era is not an easy cure-all for the problem. Even if birth was the first step, evolution does not happen instantly; many babies would die before maturity before they could evolve to adapt, and evolution does require reproduction to pass on genes and mutate said genes into new ideals. Reviving dinosaurs is far more complicated a concept to try and make reality than i really have the expertise to speak on.

It would likely take many generations to adapt permanently. If the genetic material used to recreate the dinosaurs was from their original genomes, they would develop as their previous environment demanded. Their natural lung development and oxygen transportation mechanisms would not be adequate. You would need to manually adjust their environment while they are developing, and those with mutations which were more useful for our modern environment would thrive faster and more successfully than those primarily adapted to the prehistoric atmosphere.

Yes!

I mean they're genetically modified from the beginning.

I was looking for this very comment to avoid typing the same thing. 😄

MatPat is a brain burner!(Правдивое видео):... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a6qVhNmltrjdnXU.html

Plus saying brontosaurus is cretaceous and exists

so theres a noobcompsagnathus?

i was just avout to say that

@@domesticonion8026 actually it's debatable if it exist. It was proven fake many years ago, but now some are trying to say it may have actually existed. The history of the bronto is a mess

This is why I always read gt’s comments, a lot of his videos are just restating the obvious, thank you for making gods work and saving me 15 mins of my life

Watched it either way, never getting those 15 mins back

@@Jef785 bruh

Let alone even if was the same dinosaur by being born in a different habitat would be a little more keen to survive, even more after being genetically engeneered for said habitat (btw... no wonder the parks are around tropical areas where the temperature is also higher rather than elsewhere)

You know that real velociraptors were about the size of a chicken right

@@_matejos_7695 Closer to a turkey at over 30 pounds but yes. And I would go see those beautiful turkeys with teeth every night.

@@_matejos_7695 Bigger than that more around the size of a dog still very small, and around a month after the films release raptor skeletons were discovered the size of the ones from the movie (or bigger), 20ft long called the Utah Raptor.

They were night hunters probably but thats like saying lions are only night hunters cause they have night vision, You would see them during the day as well more than likely.

You want Prehistoric Park! It's a UK TV series about a nature park that preserves extinct species by going back in time to periods when they were merely 'endangered' and rescuing specimens. It's framed as a documentary, and each episode features an A plot about crew members going back in time to rescue the 'species of the week' and a B plot about the keepers back in the modern day dealing with the species that are already living in the park (eg. trying to get sabre toothed cats to breed in captivity, or dealing with T-Rexes fighting over territory). The show is presented by a real wildlife presenter and features a real vet who plays herself treating the dinosaurs. The series was made in 2006, so some of the information is a bit out of date (feather dinosaurs *are* featured, but the T-Rex is still depicted as scaly) but I'd really recommend it.

@@Cheeseanonioncrisps oh I’ve seen prehistoric park, I loved it. Nigel is so charming! I meant to include a more modern one :) kind of like Prehistoric Kingdom but a show :)

It wouldnt prevent it actually. Max tolerance for extremes like high or low oxygen amounts are dictated almost entirely by genetics, hence why a mouse born in an environment of 5% oxygen content will die extremely quickly due to a lack of needed oxygen. Humans have limits of 18% and 24.5%, anything beyond those bounds will cause serious health issues (such as loss of consciousness, dizziness, or straight up hecking dying), even for people who have lived their entire lives on the edges of those limits. There's no real reason to assume that dinosaurs would be able to survive this kind is stuff better than every single bird, mammal, reptile, etc on earth today

@@zackbuildit88 honestly that's good to know. I was simply thinking that adapting to environment might be a factor ala the animals discovered in the Galapagos by Darwin. Nice to learn something new thank you kindly.

@@zackbuildit88 in other words really its about how much a dinosaur would be able to tolerate the climate it was put into based upon how similar it was vs its natural enviornment. That'd determine how easily it'd be able to tolerate that. Its why animals in Zoos have to have their needs met within tolerances in order to survive. Difference is that dinosaurs on the rampage would be fending for themselfs. So even herbivores would cause trouble (if they couldn't eat the plants then at least some breaking into grocery stores searching for food would be viable. As well as carnivores doing similar things. After all living animals (mostly bears and raccoons etc) do similar things

@@patg108 with all due respect, the dinosaurs would be either dead or unconscious within hours of escape due to problems with breathing and temperature, so there's no risk of them rampaging if they escape

@@zackbuildit88 nope, dinosaurs survived a variety of conditions, including low oxygen (its how they beat out the dominant archosaurs, that plus better copies and improvements on their designs of body plans) only real threat to Dinosaurs would be humans with guns and mobile vehicles (pretty much anything is a threat to some extent as long as its a small car or larger) Unless they're facing the existing giants like elephants hippos and rhinos or bears etc then some of the smaller ones might have trouble with things like that. Depending upon what encounters what they'd either win or learn to survive with it though. But poisonous and venomous snakes and insects, frogs etc (south american) and such might be the largest threat. Smaller dinos like raptors would go after it, be bit or eat a toxic one and die in a matter of hours or days. Besides with a truely accurate jurassic park you'd have to include archeosaurs (and they'd struggle a lot more (though some could survive in certain areas arguably) Basically smaller to mid size would survive and some of the larger (really depends upon where, africa or asia would be best for t-rex and similar sized predators) But if that would hypothetically happen you would see news reports of dinosaurs breaking into supermarkets no different than a bear or deer doing so. Predators would also go after cattle and livestock (they already do even in africa, its simply a easier meal than the wild buffet options) just look at reports there, they have to go to extremes just to keep some lions, leopards, hyenas and cheetahs out etc. You see similar with bears breaking into cars, homes, and stores (granted not so much with herbivores but it does happen still) Such a thing would be all over the news as much as covid is. And its theoretically possible to find a planet with life on it (could be one just like our dinosaurs), It'd probably create a whole new dino sensation (alien dinosaurs anyone?) for new documentaries and how they compare to our native extinct species.

Have you seen that video of the creepy cat fossil?

Focus on today's reptile skulls and bird skulls, not mammals. Though shrink wrapping does exist I don't think it is that big of a difference than we think.

No and yes

@@leonardoversace5544 well that definitely answers that question

How would it even be possible for an enormous tropical environment to exist in a giant pocket in the earth’s crust underneath a giant sheet of ice in freezing temperature? In other words, no. Ice Age is a fictional movie series, not fact.

no , they would suffocate because the co2 percentage of the air drastically increased during the ice ager , and the temperature required in there would melt the ice , and the many dinos in there were from different Mesozoic periods and they wouldn't be able to coexist , and the large amount of the ocean, a major carbon sink due to its phytoplankton, frozen carbon dioxide would increase much faster than decrease making an oxygen rich atmosphere . we're still technically in an ice age but greenhouse effects and minor heating cycles have warmed it up to the point it is today the goldilocks temperatures the dinos need wouldn't be able to be sustained with the different atmosphere and giant ice ceiling absorbing any heat in the cave so even if they were giant mammals in the cave like manny the mammoth they would die

a source doesn't become outdated because it's old. It becomes outdated when it's challenged and/or disproven by new data. Could you provide citations on the Jurassic and Cretaceous oxygen levels?

the instincts though, and if they did used to live in lower oxygen levels then if one manages to adapt they'd be a bit too big brained for us.

@@redblade5556 yes, they would probably still have their instincts, but they would probably still dont behave in the same way as Dinosaurs did back then (as I explained above, just look up the example I gave). And I dont really get your big brain point

​@@eliasrieger9883 well, how would a T-rex behave then?? I know in the first one Sam Neil and Laura Dern (or was it in the second one??) were all excited at finding out that dinosaurs raised their young like a family but was that an "aww Disney" moment or was it true?? and what would they SOUND like?? Nobody knows...lol it's like with aliens, we just stick with what we know...but we don't really know anything!! definitely big brain time cos my plebeian brain just exploded🤯

@@twiceshy9773 yes its really fascinating and kinda sad that we will never know for sure... but if your intereseted you can search on KZfaq how some Dinosaurs MIGHT have sounded like based on fossil evidence

They cover that point in both the books and the movie. Remember when Laura Dern says that extinct species have no idea what century they are in and will defend themselves violently if necessary? That's also why the raptors in the books are so over the top vicious compared to an ordinary predatory animal that knows how to behave and interact with its environment like a wolf or even a crocodile.

Ya that was my theory as well. If spino did not show up the red would have stopped and gone back to eating.

He didn't state they WOULD die. But could given the conditions. Yes the Dinos could survive and acclimate, but that doesn't necessarily mean they would. If you or I tried to do that, we probably could acclimate, but we may not, and those are high risks as he said. Though I get what you mean.

Last fight kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mLqPeMJ_vMu5kYU.html

Frogs have vision like that So I guess however frogs prevent doing that themselves

In the novel, it says every dinosaur doesn't see things that don't move, because of the frog DNA

Fun Fact: this was actually addressed in the follow up, in which it's suggested the T-Rex didn't eat them not because it couldn't see them, but rather because it had already fed (on the goat) and was not particularly hungry. Instead it was essentially playing with them. Screwing around for giggles.

@@DisgruntledArtist what about the lawyer why she eat him

That's a fall of 20 meters, so divided by 4 seconds they're traverlling at about 5m/s or 16' per second on impact or 1/7 of terminal velocity as they're being slowed down. It's very survivable, equivalent of falling from just 1 meter or 3'. As for the sand, it's... complicated XD Not much though.

32.982

I mean, didn't they mention something like this in the original movie? Right at the beginning? And wasnt something like it brought back up in thr 3rd movie? That dinos had feathers and such I havent watched them in a long while so I could be COMPLETELY WRONG and thats all right

Actually as a man with 3 biology degrees, the VAST majority of Dinos didn’t have any feathers, or anything close to feather. You’re not wrong about JP velociraptor, that probably should have some feathers, but the VASSSSSST majority of Dinos did not. That’s just a fact.

fun fact, the reason JP calls deinonychus "velociraptor" is a book called "predatory dinosaurs of the world" by gregory paul, who consistently depicts them as fully feathered.

@@burna8753 there are very good reasons to think the ancestor of all dinosaurs had proto-feathers though. for instance finding them in both major branches of dinosauria. and now that pterosaur pycnofibers have bern shown to be protofeathers, it seems like they're a basal ornithodiran condition. certainly larger dinosaurs lost them secondarily though, just as elephants today aren't particularly hairy, but hair is a basal manmalian feature.

@@arachnophilia427 they looked like giant japanese silkie chickens.

Maybe he meant that specific fossil was discovered in 2016? I was confused by that too since I immediately thought of the dinosaur pokemon Archeops, which is feathered and came out in 2010

@@BleydXVI The fossil he used as an image was discovered in the mid 1870s, so still way off

Finally some one woth brain cells active Jurassic park also nearly invented speculative biology for paleontology (Compsognathus Venom, raptor and rex behaviour, dilophosaurus frills and Venom) Yeah most of what they say in the video is not false but simplified and when you think about it a bit more it became just fake.

And also if people that can create dinos can create them they probably can give them adaptations to survive in 2022.

xD

@@l.p.3876 That too. In later stages certainly. The first stages I imagine would just be "Make some and see what happens." as cruel as that feels.

@@SuperJJx first attempts

@@l.p.3876 But the whole point of the video was exploring what would happen if we had genetically pure dinosaurs, pretend we time traveled and stole a T-rex from the actual cretaceous period and stuck them in a zoo, and how we would make that work.

Writer actually know lot about this topic. He solve all issues by fact hat in books (and also Jurassic World) those were actually mutants designed for shady reasons.

@@TheRezro I hate when they force you to read to get more lore but hey at least the books cleared this up.

I mean besides mega theropods (you know T. rex,spino and carnatoras) A lot of dinosaurs had feathers or in some cases hair on an elephant.

@@brandogents6624 dude the movies were based on the books. Micheal Crichton wrote jurassic park, then licensed the books to paramount.

Definitely that

MatPat is a brain burner!(Правдивое видео):..... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a6qVhNmltrjdnXU.html

so many bots.

@@duckyydann5889 Does reporting them do anything?

@@PtrkHrnk i dont really bother, i just move on with my day.

Thanks I was about to go mad if no one else noticed.

It’s just a Compsognathus actually. A Procompsognathus was a different dinosaur.

actually a recent-ish study has proven that brontosaurus and apatosaurus was different dinosaurs.

@@Delete240 I know, I thought I remember in the franchise (novels, movies and Camp Cretacous) they explicitely used Procompsognathus, but maybe I'm remembering wrong. Both don't look like that one from JP, so it doesn't matter

@@Ronja_the_fairy Really? My last update was that Brontosaurus doesn't even really exist, but if what you're saying is new knowledge, then thanks for the update

Wait but scientists say that chickens are the closest to trex

@@ahmedfaiyazazad8415 and? Birds and crocodiles are closely related. You clearly have no understanding of DNA, genetics or evolution. Most dinosaurs did not have feathers or anything close to feathers. Yes, birds are reptiles and feathers evolved from scales, but evolution is not what the uneducated think it is. A pandas closest relatives are dogs and seals, all 3 are very different creatures. We can see it in some species, humans and other apes have so much in common. Baby chimps gorillas and humans look near identical. Adult chimps and humans can often look very similar, but depends on the race of both species

@@burna8753 some dinosaurs had feathers not all

@@burna8753 birds are dinosaurs?

@@JosephSmith-lm4ri yup