Wait, I thought Michaelangelo was the party dude?

@@DavidMcCoul I think its a reunion though

@Güliz There was an exhibition at the National Gallery in London with 9 of his 16 surviving paintings.

In Italy porco giuda

Same.

So beautifully said

I'm Shure a huge amount of money💰 helped her feel better 🖼️

@@jas5192 The painting is not Leo's. According to the experts, it's a really bad painting done by one of his student and then retouched again by this lady. It's a hodgepodge piece of utter mess.

@@kazearaki853 Appreciate the information! I didn't know.

The best marketing campaign is revealed when nobody understands this is the revealing of the marketing campaign.

Well, he is her life's partner after all

It will be in Abu Dhabi Louvre after its private tour i heard

Ah somebody didn’t get the reference.

Indiana Jones

So do my arms.

R u really serious...? . . . . . It was obviously King Leonaodis of Sparta

He loves pizza, i know

He is still alive or did someone steal is talent.

Haha

Skilled*

It’s not a definitive fact that is was by Leonardo himself

It's fake you fool, a blind man could see that!

Exactly. Priceless. Sacred. I will dare to say, this painting is holy, as if painted by an angel assigned by God to create this great masterpiece. Painted by a student, or da Vinci, or a consummation of a divinely inspired Conservator? The painting is divine, we can clearly see that. It inspires awe, the sight of it. Seeing it has transformed me, and my ideas as a practicing artist, about the role divinity may actually play in the revelation of itself, through human excellence, on the part of an exalted artist, and beyond the artist, the greatest Conservator honored to restore the work, and bring it back to life, as perhaps never before. The level of sublimity demonstrated in it's highest degree, by the Conservator, so generous and eloquent, to share with us her loss. We who love and devote our lives to a deep love of beauty will know in seeing this work, how much it is about the pricelessness it holds as a true value. The divine, spiritual quality of this work is staggering. We may never see this kind of 'imprint of the divine' ever again, to such a degree in a work of art. It outshines the Mona Lisa, for me it certainly does. It reminds me of a possible reiteration. The hand of God or angel reaching to touch the hand of man, although, in this case it is a woman whose hand was blessed. The grand master artisan who created this holy work of art? Above all, the Conservator, divinely inspired, and empowered to deliver such great beauty. From one perspective, it makes no difference if only the barest bit of the under painting or initial drawing was created by Leonardo da Vinci. The historical weight Leonardo's name carries, is only one aspect of the divinity of this painting questionable though it may be. It is significant to a high degree, but obviously, the painting is a hybrid of influences, and several people may have or did in fact build on its greatness. A woman's hand restored this work to an ultimate perfection, as your sublime video here shows. A woman in deep grief, who shows what we can see and feel and know, a reflection of the sacred in our inner being, reflects back to us through this work so obviously inspired by God and or his angels. Her hand, inspired by an angel, the spirit of da Vinci, a student who contributed, or God the Almighty? How rare is it to see and recognize a miracle of what feels like it transmits an element of the divine, if ever one gets to see a painting so magnificent? To learn of the many associated details, explained in this video, and to witness for oneself the sublimity of this painting, is to experience an inner elevation in the viewer. The painting crosses cyberspace, and our over to those watching. Doe s it not penetrate and elevates the viewer in some uniquely spiritual way? No matter the auction price, now or tomorrow. Beyond that, no matter the artist or group of artists and handlers, only the final outcome which is self evident. and sublime, and which catches the viewer unprepared. We experience the revelation and miracle of seeing this magnificent and holy work of art, and we will likely feel humbled, as I surely was. Thank you, for this miracle of what I believe is God's hand on the hand of this divinely inspired Conservator. She has delivered to the world, a great, grand treasure, and a blessing to the world. Bravo, and Brava! Thank you for your marvelous and blessed presentation as well. 🙏💐🥂🙏💐🥂

@@JoyceDade it is definitely a beautiful painting 🖼

She spent six years on it.

Leonardo is the hardest artist to emulate I’ve found. Picasso and Van Gogh being much easier.

@@chris42690 what about Dalí? I’m curious

@@SebastianLopez-nh1rr Dali is quite difficult to emulate aswell. A lot of his 3D strokes are out of my wheelhouse. I would love to learn how to someday though.

14.99 second ads

They are playing 2 continuous ads 😑

19sec add

They want more money from ads

I had a 15 second ad and immediately got ad block after that

Business is business my friend

when she restores, she touches up and paints on it herself so does that make it 100% legit.

@@MrRocktex1978 Yes as she uses as they all do reversible paints on top of a sealed layer to protect the original.

She made this look nothing like a de vinci!

@@RehabProjectSRCB Oh, that's great to hear. I thought she had irreversibly destroyed the entire painting by having used oil. Hopefully the whole thing will soon be taken to someone competent who will be able to reanimate the Leonardo's spirit and remove everything that makes this Salvator Mundi final version an insulting and hideous travesty of the original that once had been. artwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/a-pic-7.jpg

If you find anything call me, I will restore :)

It was my aunt and uncle who had it in there home for almost 60 years.... there are in heaven now and are probably giggling with glee that they had owned this. Maybe they are giving Leonardo a high five up in heaven. Sad, however, that when my cousins sold this in the estate sale, they had no idea what it was......obviously...... they got about 2k for it....

@@row1landr and my dad was obama

@@whut9245 well aren't you a son of a bit#h then.. 😂👏

@@row1landr What’s the point in lying like this?

That is no de vinci, just look at it! Even a amateur can see that

Okay, What documentation went into then validating the Painting as a Leonardo DaVinci?

@@commonsense31 There was no documentation whatsoever in declaring this painting to be a DaVinci. Two things were done - First, there was a visual examination by DaVinci experts in both the US and Europe who deemed the painting to be authentic based on style and on quality. Second, an analysis was done on the paint, canvas, and wood frame to date the painting to the 16th century and trace the origin of the materials used to northern Italy. Those checked out but of course an exact date couldn't be given. The painting could have been done later in the 16th century after DaVinci's death. Now do you think those alone are good enough to prove authenticity of a painting done by a master that could be worth tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars? Given the monies involved, there was certainly an incentive to declare this painting to be genuine.

Caviteña ElskerEuropa a museum would have had to participated in the auction as well

How are you so sure of your words?

true knowing comes from a realm of true perfection...in this perfect realm, knowing what is true is both immediate and direct...it is a function of the divine heart...one does not have to engage in the thought processes of the mind....the divine heart reads energy....the information is all in the energy of a thing....what is true has an energetic frequency of truth...of course, this is something which we all possess...sadly, i have found few people on this planet that have managed to untangle themselves from all the illusions to function as the divine being they truly are...however, there are now more cracks in the dam, so to speak...the rushing river of light will not be held back much longer

Sure, good life pal-

you are perfect...and that's the perfection Leonardo is showing you in this painting...look into the painting with the eyes of your heart and you will see your perfect divine self

Val Lamon Jesus was black

@ Andy Huang , I'm thinking this was a well thought out Scam 💰

Well, it sorta IS Leonardo, just not in the shape and form as it were ''restored'' into. Look at the cleaned version, the modelling and realistic features of the painting are excellent, albeit there are significant damages. Modestini gave the picture an artificial cartoonish 2D appearance, that can no longer be called a Leonardo by any stretch of imagination..

Well As it has been confirmed through Research and Historic notes, History books and all the Experts that has spend a lifetime studying the tiniest method and tiny deviations of Leonardo DaVinci. I think I'm gonna trust the Evidence presented and the experts. And not some random Painters on KZfaq, That has some valid Trust issue with Authorities about something that was sold for 400Million USD.

@@DanielJackson2010 So you have seen it in person, You must have since you can speak with such authority on the issue. Oh Also what are your credentials in restoring Paintings from the 1500 century? Because your assessment of the picture and lifetime devotion to restoration, must be at the level as Modestini that restored the Painting.

@@commonsense31 Which part of Modestini's Homunculus Mundi carnage of a restoration project you love the most? Put the Modestini version side by side with the cleaned and raw Salvator Mundi and tell me you prefer the Homunculus. Then, I will have no more to say. ;)

The Salvadore Mundi Abomination would be a better name for this piece .Biggest fraud in art history.

Andreas Houg, same here, it almost makes me fall asleep

The build up to legitimise the sudden found battered painting is absolutely disgusting. What is disgusting is the original owners only got $700 after the dealers bought online for $1200 and immediately assigned Martin Kemp to ble$$ the battered plank. Literally major inCONsistencies in provenance and the attribution is very controversial. The Pentimento theory or thumb duplicate is a classic forgers trick. Any decent forger would know how to manipulate a close inspection. Beltracci did brillaint fakes for years as Sothebys continued to sell his works via dealers. Carlos Slim was sold multiple fakes of Modigliani and other works with the authentication validated by multiple experts. The Mundi is just another Delusion for The Masses. The Modestini Mega Makeover ensued without any disclosure or scrutiny. Apparently there are no physical HD pre 2005 photos. In other words there is no evidence to view any microbial aspects or deduce chronology to cross examine. Modestini jazzed it up over 4+ painstaking years whilst at the same time it's public profile was glorified by Martin Kemp who happens to be the convenient Da Vinci armchair academic expert. Martin Kemp single handedly started to process of instigating and planted the seed to suggest there is a possibility of the hand of Da Vinci (without providing ANY EVIDENCE to support the sudden theory) This Mundi saga was to appease 'The Bouvier Affair' as Sothebys were about to get brought to task for back to back Art Flipping. What is hilarious is The Arabs would actually buy a 'Controversial Christ.' Even Judas must be giggling.!! The Saudis bought it to SLAP DOWN their little irritating nemesis 'Qatar' whom are currently as Sovereign World Art Champions with Billions invested in Arts and Highest Profile World Record Prices paid for paintings. Martin Kemp is a corrupt and vested interested entity. Ref. Bella Principessa. He is a laughing stock in the Old Masters world but he is crucial to Museums as their balance sheets are dependent on footfall and merchandi$e. Why do you think the ONLY ACCEPTED Da Vinci's are ONLY IN TOP END MUSEUMS !!!! Martin Kemp & Cohorts Luke Syson and Nicholas Penny proceeded to glorify the Salvador Mundi via exhibiting it in the UK National Gallery whilst other renowned experts with integrity didn't want their name bestowed with Da Vinci Artworld Corruption. Incidentally, there are 4 copies of The Mona Lisa. The original was stolen 1911 only for the retrieved replica reinstated at The Louvre whereby it was restolen by The SS during WWII. The Louvre keep absolutely quiet about this. I hate to tell you this but there is a lot more than just The Mundi Fraud.

Who did?

@@aayurramanuj king of Saudi arabia

@@whut9245 whut?

Yeah king salman bought it

Nope, MBS crown prince of Saudi Arabia.

Raji Jojo amen

The person is Leonardo in drag

Leonardo had a type.

@jay fine incorrect. the losses to the face were minimal.

They were painted by the sme person so yeah there is gong to be similarities.

@jay fine how much would the “same face curse” of artists impact the liking & restoration? i only ask bc you seem to know a lot on the subject

it a wonder of the world... and VERY very good work

I feel for my cousins...it was in their home for almost 60 years. When they sold it in my uncle's estate sale, they obviously didn't know what they had.....

I would have loved to have had it. My cousins would have loved to have kept it, but not knowing what it was, she would have given it to me if I had asked her, for memory's sake.

“Salvatore” isn’t the name it’s Latin for “savior” 😂😂😂

Juliette De Maso they are showing it around the world

It's very very controversial as The Salvator Mundi profile was enhanced to appease and settle the controversy. Research *The Bouvier Affair* Robert Simon Fine Art linked to the corrupt academic Martin Kemp originally bought it online auction for just *$1200* The battered panel was presented to the corrupt characters in the artworld who orchestrated the profile of the battered plank with no origin evidence to prove a Da Vinci. The build up to legitimize the Mundi is Absolutely Disgusting. Corrupt Elite Artworld Attribution. Diane Modestini complicit in her part thus absolutely no way to unravel the origin of the origin as there are Absolutely no HD photos post the 2005 auction purchase. If you Research *'The Bouvier Affair'*. It was sold for 80M then 127.5M. Sothebys were about to get mega exposed for back to back Art dealing Flipping. Bouvier had been fleecing Dmitry for years. 700M he fleeced in double dealing. When the controversy happened and legal situations started - Christie's conveniently stepped in to stop any art world corruption exposure. But NOW on a grand scale the false attribution, corruption and controversy continues. What is hilarious is The Arabs would actually buy a 'Controversial Christ.' Even Judas must be giggling.!! 🤣

@@daniyalg2436 the Arabs lost it...mmm... yes indeed. A painting of 450 Million... where did I put that again???mmm... hahahaha...It is obviously fake. And NO painting is worth 450 million... great for money laundering though...

@@daniyalg2436 youre are right. Especially the last part lol

He cant. No access

I heard that too😂😂😂

The build up to legitimise the sudden found battered painting is absolutely disgusting. What is disgusting is the original owners only got $700 after the dealers bought online for $1200 and immediately assigned Martin Kemp to ble$$ the battered plank. The Modestini Mega Makeover ensued without any disclosure or scrutiny. Apparently there are no physical HD pre 2005 photos. In other words there is no evidence to view any microbial aspects or deduce chronology to cross examine. Modestini jazzed it up over 4+ painstaking years whilst at the same time it's public profile was glorified by Martin Kemp who happens to be the convenient Da Vinci armchair academic expert. Martin Kemp & Cohorts Luke Syson and Nicholas Penny proceeded to glorify the Salvador Mundi via exhibiting it in the UK National Gallery whilst other renowned experts with integrity didn't want their name bestowed with Da Vinci Artworld Corruption. Martin Kemp single handedly started to process of instigating and planted the seed to suggest there is a possibility of the hand of Da Vinci (without providing ANY EVIDENCE to support the sudden theory) This Mundi saga was to appease 'The Bouvier Affair' as Sothebys were being revealed for back to back Art dealing called Flipping. Literally major incosistencies in provenance and the attribution is very controversial. The Pentimento theory or thumb duplicate is a classic forgers trick. Any decent forger would know how to manipulate a close inspection. Beltracci did brilliant fakes for years as Sothebys continued to sell his works via dealers. Carlos Slim was sold multiple fakes of Modigliani and other works with the authentication validated by multiple experts. The Mundi is just another Delusion for The Masses. What is hilarious is The Arabs would actually buy a 'Controversial Christ.' Even Judas must be giggling.!! In my own opinion, The Saudis bought it to SLAP DOWN their little irritating nemesis 'Qatar' whom are currently as Sovereign World Art Champions with Billions invested in Arts and Highest Profile World Record Prices paid for paintings. Martin Kemp is just another corrupt and vested interested entity. Research... Bella Principessa. but he is crucial to Museums as their balance sheets are dependent on footfall and merchandi$e. Why do you think the ONLY ACCEPTED Da Vinci's are ONLY IN TOP END MUSEUMS !!

isnt 99 pct of Leos work with portraits in profile from the side?not head on?except for the Vetruvian man! "School of DaVinci" more like it!

Stop talking like a pretentious fool; it will color the entirety of your life..

Agreed, not a Leonardo, who's figures are always twisting and turning against the light. This is far too simple to be a Leonardo. However, I believe the facial features are impressive and may have been touched by the master himself. It has that hazy dream affect akin to the Mona Lisa.

...

Alexander Reynolds no you idiot

What are you asking for it?

What's the asking price,my budget is 200 millions dollars,not a penny more. And I'll pay Cash on delivery.

Email me loachapoka@ymail.com

Its Salvatore. 🤣

Bingo.

I'm sure you have studied it in person for endless hours like the lady in the video has?

The mouth is the give away..