No chit hu 😂😂😂

Yah he’s awesome!

100!!!!

birth to 3 yo +- learning is wfo and then pruning of mental connections until we(me) start losing everything .

Slick! I wasn't fully paying attention and wondered why the numbers were blurry.....that is a good one.

my tuned 6.4 powerstroke has pretty much that to the rear wheels and its from 08 with a tune intake and exhaust

@@nou8257 This has a warranty to back it and your truck has a prayer to hold it together.

@@peterdang9475 and mine is 100k less

@@nou8257 How much would a truck like yours sell for right now and how much would it cost to bulletproof the engine and trans? I have been there. My parents bought a 2005 f350 6.0 with a partial bulletproof job on the engine, multiple tunes, intake, large free flowing exhaust, etc. and only 75000 miles. It pulled like a beast and I considered buying and building one like it. Instead, I ended up with some good paying work and bought a 2020 Chevy z71 LTZ CCLB with all the extras (same as the high country trucks and same price at $74k sticker and $68k after rebates and a deal from a neighbor in June of 2020). The L5p with the derringer and throttle monster spanks the dually f350 with a hot tune when empty and the L5P tows far nicer. It is never in the wrong gear our out of gears and never runs out of power, towing the same toyhauler and dump trailer with equipment in it. The 6.0 sounds amazing when you get on it but the lack of exhaust smell and how quiet the duramax is while towing even a decent load up steep grades is very nice for long drives with middle aged ears that have been beat over the years. The ride and comfort as well as cameras and all the other features is great. My other pickup, was my daily driver, is a 79 Chevy C20 with a well built 406 SBC and gearvendors overdrive. That ford is great, but if you are willing to spend the money (I didn't already have an older diesel and I do a lot of out of town work) the duramax is a beast with luxury.

@@CGT80 I was offered 30k for my truck couple years ago and I turned it down. the value of something differs to each person and this truck is what I wanted so when I found it I bought it. And there is no bullet proofing that is a very over used term with 6.0's. my truck is a 6.4 and to bullet proof it as you said well its kinda already been done as the emissions system is gone it is what killed those trucks regardless of what a large number of people who have never owned one will yell against them. But to toss a number out there if I just went and put 6.7 steel pistons into my 6.4 did some other upgrades to it i'd say I could do that in the 10-15k range with me doing the majority of the work since I have plenty of tools to take the engine out and disassemble it for the machine shop. I can also go the cheaper route too buy the adapter kit and put a 12v cummins in it for around 10k or less and then it would have one of the best engines ever produced. I tow with my 02 f350 7.3 with a zf6 speed manual trans have easily pulled around 20k with it no real problem just about never have had to leave 6th gear pulling a hill with it vs automatic transmissions which usually die when used for towing and don't know when to shift correctly to use the engines torque. The exhaust smell of a diesel never bothered me. I grew up around diesels and all kinds of cars I prefer the old diesels to the new ones that burn my nose and eyes with their dpf junk espically in regen. But hey the duramax works for you that's great. My old trucks work for my applications pulling my trailers.

following

technically could be possible. would require a redesign of both dyno and fan to, probably cost so much to do and probably wont make much difference.

Considering the truck maxes out at 96 or whatever it is, the 60 mph fan is good enough.

I was thinking the exact same thing.

I would like to also know what they produce from the same dyno.

I was looking for any comparison videos too.

Dynod my 2023 ford yesterday. 493hp, 1003tq.

@@arod6789 Holy crap! Wow!!

I dyno'd yesterday. 493hp, 1003tq

At the wheels?

If you had a ford you could lug it down to 1600rpm but Chevy and ram don’t offer that with the manual mode

@@dallasbyler2946 I don't know about the Dodge but my Chevy can be forced to stay in 1st even with the automatic, just shift into manual mode and modulate the throttle to keep it at 1600 rpm.

Emmissions plain and simple. The 10 speed transmission is so the engine can be kept in optimal RPM for Emmission control. The manual transmission version in 2008 for instance was still at LB7 power levels. Auto equipped (LMM) was much higher. Not everyone can drive a manual successfully with todays power pulling 30k and not kill the clutch. Automatics always pull more consistently.

That's a good idea ! I second that wish ! :D

We all know there is. Commercial chassis tend to be derated significantly

Indeed

Just seen a '23 Super Duty for the first time today...ugh. The GMC Sierra is the best looking pickup at the moment.

@@outbacker292 agreed, the ford redesign makes the gm look like gold

@@5.43v just saw a new Ford super duty. The headlight design makes it look bug eyed like the maverick. 🤮

Agreed, those new Superdutys are ugly as heck!

Plus the L5P was already a significant improvement over the outgoing LML Duramax.

@@OneNationUnderGod. yeah I'm aware of improvements I just like to see engineer's do it right not just tune and 4.10 gears or bla bla

on GM in manual mode teh ECM can still downshift. just locks out teh upper gears. Ford is the only one with a real "manual" mode. no 3rd gear starts either on Ram or GM.

@@duramaxadventures5832 What's wrong with a torque converter lockup mod?

@@einfelder8262 i didnt say there was anything wrong. are you sure you are replying to teh correct comment?

I would like to see and super duty run as well.

@Duramax Adventures you can lugg the Ford back to 900rpm if you really want to. I always use the engine brake, as it locks the TC and slightly changes the shift schedule. Not as much as tow/haul but it holds gears far better.

😉

As of now, we’re not making any further announcements for the Derringer LM2/LZ0 until it’s ready to launch. Development is already underway with much of it being done in parallel with the new RAM and Ford 6.7L devices. The current Derringer hardware for the GM/EcoDiesel form factory isn’t a viable design for our performance goals. Are these goals achievable? Yes, 100%. Newer, modern diesels require more that just manipulating more than just MAP and FRP. Our new tuner will feature injector pulse-width control/timing, a new harness/circuitboard, new software, and an app that ties into our Banks Ecosystem. Once this new Derringer platform is tested and dialed in for the LM2/LZ0, we’ll share it with the world.

@@bankspower as soon as you do release the tuner to the public I will be buying it ASAP. Hopefully sooner than later

Other than making twice the torque with around 80% better fuel economy?

​@@madweazland at half the rpm