Marcus Licinius Crassus at Carrhae, yeah, am i a joke to you? Battle of Brenta they say the same thing "first time Westerners experienced eastern warfare style" Each time they repeat themselves about Western and eastern warfare meeting That sucks with the eastern way, you are on a horse you shoot an arrow and you flee, WTH!? Glad to not come from an eastern warfare style civilization, thx God i am a Westerner

Gunpowder was also an Eastern invention :)

@@saguntum-iberian-greekkons7014 East have always been superior society in everything including warfare till 18th century. They have developed much better technology, war tactics, generals etc. That's why Eastern history is a lot richer than Western. Amount of proper battles between strong armies, amount of dynasties, empires, religious sects, games for thrones women being major figure etc. are considerably higher. And First crusade would've surely failed if Seljuq Empire wasn't in disintegration period after death of Malik Shah. Remember Fatimids were uncapable state which was ruled through an ideology and couldn't hold any half decent campaign against Seljuqs on the battlefield.

@@turalf.9039 well and by this logic, Byzantium would had not fallen without inside instability neither, do you even know that the battle of manzikert is not the direct consequence? Most of the troops didn't even fought, and there was a dynastic crisis, which led anatolia open to conquest, with barely no opposition. In the same way the Crusaders (first crusade) were able to advance quickly because the seljuk barons helped crusaders against their own kin, they knew if they regrouped , the neighbor would attack them while they go on campaign

@@turalf.9039 The history of the East is richer? I think you're mistaken, but I can't be sure because I don't know what you qualify as the East or as richer. When looking at what people consider to be the East it's only like 30 countries. Not only that, but a lot of their history has been obliterated over time; maybe a lot more is lost. If you're counting lost history as part of the richer history, I think pre-17 century North/South American history might also has a lot as well. Still, I just don't see how anything can even come close to matching Mediterranean history. They were exceptional record keepers.

DAMN

Nine Tailed Box so within 1 year then. #killedthejoke

ed4pints #killedthecrusaders

Nine Tailed Box lol

I clicked faster than the enslavement of the children's crusade.

DEUS VULT

Who thought this generation would be so ridiculous?

@@pavelmachytka5604 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7Jndax409CYg3U.html

@@punsher5254 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7Jndax409CYg3U.html

And went to fight the Muslims armies which were fenomenal.

The crusaders morale was high for numerous reasons it’s entertaining to me

@@ericsandrade kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7Jndax409CYg3U.html

@@okishira927 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7Jndax409CYg3U.html

@Mighty-Light the quran is an joke

Did they Naruto run tho?

Austin Nieves I don’t think they plan on holding the base for a long time.

@@tancreddehauteville9983 The point is that without a good leadership or coordination, team work is doomed to fail.

Don't you mean the Area 51 Massacre?

Except the raid of area 51 wont happen

taggling? do you mean tackling

fixed! thanks for letting me know :)

maybe but i find it interesting nonetheless

Just because they were fraught with failures doesn't mean they were not interesting. In fact that's what makes them *more* interesting to some people.

Actually because in those ages you wouldn't need to wear a cloak waiting in an alley heat the hijabi just passing with a club and run. You could massacre all her family, struggle her while raping her and be considered a hero. Those were good ages. ;)

I actually took the time to... *pause the video....that's not it... then got to google translate to find out and it told me to "go f**k yourself"* ...definitely worth it...

It was also nice to hear the correct pronunciation of the country. HungAry and not "Hungry" like "I'm hungry".

Lol that's funny

Dániel Simon please let’s refrain from abusive language Thank you

@@shahzaibahmed. baszd meg magad

Excellent point.

You mean the church that was destroyed 90 years before the crusaders arrived and was rebuild 50 years before the crusaders arrived?

@@mathy1799 Yes, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. What is your point?

@@daviddavison2582 he was trying to imply that there isn't any friction because it's been "50 years" or somesuch, ignorant that the very fact that it was destroyed counters the orginal claim that there's "no major friction"

@@daviddavison2582 he means that Christians could also raze Mecca, pretending that nothing major happened. then some years later rebuild it and Christians be like "Its a prank bro"

Lord Voldemort In a way, the major battles of the First Crusade could be compared to the major battles of the Original Star Wars Trilogy. Dorylaeum was the First Crusade's Yavin, Antioch was Hoth, and Jerusalem was Endor.

@@kevinnorwood8782 and the battle after jerusalem the battle of jakku

@@julioputin3674 Now that I think about it, that actually sounds pretty appropriate.

@@kevinnorwood8782 yeah ascalon

@@kevinnorwood8782 Star Wars wanker.

It is even a topic of discussion that whether the religious part of the crusade was actually the primary objective or just a kind of propaganda to make people join it

Well said.

I have been suspicious of this for some time and i've seen a lot of mentions of how kind islamics are to non-islamics even in games

I just find it ironic, how people in the far right have seemed to by the false narrative... They have so much of their platform these days based around the stupidity of the Muslim immigration, the terrible nature of Islam, etc... And then simultaneously agree with them whenever it deals with Jews or Israel really. Strange to see Islam and the alt-right become the best of bedfellows.

The statement about coexisting religions is a false one. Non muslims had to pay protection money to be able to stay christian or jewish. They had to wear indications of their religion so they were publicly displayed as lesser than a muslim. Enter the yellow star. Non muslims were bullied and abused. Pilgrims often attacked and killed on the roads. The crusades were a direct response on muslim behaviour. How dare you speak of christian atrocities while these were nothing compared by what the muslims had done and were still doing.

It was so sad, to hear, how easy that army was gone. They come nowhere and dream of salvation in Jerusalem. 20.000 insane just gone, just like that because they were not organized.

@@NO1jkpg I thought it was sad to hear how they massacred innocent cities and Jewish populations. I actually smiled and laughed when BazBattles said that army got annihilated without trouble

True great history kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7Jndax409CYg3U.html

\[T]/ -Praise the sun!- Deus Vult!

They were an unorganized band of brigands

Why let ___ get in the way of a good crusade?!?

its called revenge

DEUS VULT

It's the history of the world, I guess

Keneki For The Win enlighten us

This comment is only here so that I can see you write comments. It has no other purpose.

David vsm yup

I mean I guess he could also leave out the fact that the turks were constantly raiding and attacking the west before that time. The american slave trade pales in comparison to the Ottoman slave trade

Ups and downs may occur but you can't reject the fact that the fatemi dynasty was the most tolerant, accepted and loved Muslims dynasty, having major contributions in science, technology and literature

@@joonsuter9307 they took over a million people out of europe and made them slaves..where are you getting tolerant from?

slavery is not that big thing when it happens to europeans i guess

You have my highest respect just for being polite while pointing out those historical inaccuracies. Other people in the comments seem to not be able to do that...

Carnifex |Ger| thank you!

Unfortunately, it's not considered acceptable in this day and age to accurately portray history in any way that makes the religious European ideals justified in anything they did.

....Simply because IF there were supposedly occurrences but these were just "occurrences" these events (friction(s) & invasion of Muslims) does not register a big mark on THAT time & in magnitude unlike Crusaders infighting, attacking indiscriminately & invasions etc.

Gotta bend the knee to the Muslims and leftist narrative lest your youtube vids be demonetized.

@Irish Patriot snowflake

@Irish Patriot Angry Greek lover detected.

*DEUS* ... oh wait

i wish i listened to you but i didnt. I fell dead inside

παντελης μαρκογιαννακης Because you got genocided by Turks

what you just said ,akes no sense

You're a GREEK, you should know about the Pontican genocide.

The best commander/leader was imo Roger of Salerno, also most caring about his people i think

@gltsry04 bohemond was captured by turks battle at melitene(battle of melitene)

@gltsry04 No he wasn’t. He died of old age

@@Morphologicallyy kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7Jndax409CYg3U.html

NO. Their math was SO GOOD that they passed it to the Greeks by trade and to the West eventually.

The OP and the first comment reminds me of the Rick and Morty episode where Jerry-clones congratulate each other.

Any attack on ANY religion was considered the worst thing you could do back then. So any attack on anything of religion was MAJOR friction and the worse kind.

@@dap3051 no

@@mouhammedainine3619 Yes, actually. All these men did were write books that didn't even try to deny religion or anything but they were punished for writing. All taking place before or little after. This is also just an example of 3 men who only wrote books. There are many more and much worse cases. __Rhazes (865-925) __ Muhammad ibn Zakariyā Rāzī or Rhazes was a medical pioneer from Baghdad who lived between 860 and 932 AD. He was responsible for introducing western teachings, rational thought and the works of Hippocrates and Galen to the Arabic world. One of his books, Continens Liber, was a compendium of everything known about medicine. The book made him famous, but offended a Muslim priest who ordered the doctor to be beaten over the head with his own manuscript, which caused him to go blind, preventing him from future practice. __Michael Servetus (1511-1553) __ Servetus was a Spanish physician credited with discovering pulmonary circulation. He wrote a book, which outlined his discovery along with his ideas about reforming Christianity - it was deemed to be heretical. He escaped from Spain and the Catholic Inquisition but came up against the Protestant Inquisition in Switzerland, who held him in equal disregard. Under orders from John Calvin, Servetus was arrested, tortured and burned at the stake on the shores of Lake Geneva - copies of his book were accompanied for good measure. Galileo (1564-1642) The Italian astronomer and physicist Galileo Galilei was trialled and convicted in 1633 for publishing his evidence that supported the Copernican theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun. His research was instantly criticized by the Catholic Church for going against the established scripture that places Earth and not the Sun at the center of the universe. Galileo was found "vehemently suspect of heresy" for his heliocentric views and was required to "abjure, curse and detest" his opinions. He was sentenced to house arrest, where he remained for the rest of his life and his offending texts were banned.

Holly shit Sargon! keep up the good fight buddy :)

Did your dumbass make it past minute 5?

instaBlaster

Thanks kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7Jndax409CYg3U.html

falco81dist DEUS VULT

falco81dist pretending like it doesn't reek of the same ignorance as Allahuakbar

+Cool Dog a heretic is a dissident to church canon a heathen or infidel is a member of another religion ya dont know shit

falco81dist it's a detail but I think it was "DEUS LO VULT" and not "DEUS VULT". Same meaning but in a more "familiar" form more likely to be used back then...

it's the same except muslims still use islam to influence their every day life and we dont because we won and muslims are at near bottom of existing cultures.

R/unexpectedbillwurtz

#ExtraCredits

Kind of funny how whenever politics were getting to heated in medieval europe, everyone would just go on a crusade as if it was a vacation. Imagine if we did that nowadays: "Well, this impeachment business is a little too spicy. Time for a crusade!"

Nice!

NO. we dont care for a crusade.

you guys so strong...

in case you come: turkeytravelguide.com/

Seems like Trump care... xD

Reasonable people dont care about a worthless strip of sand in the desert.

Cheers from Poland! :)

@@michaobidzinski1125 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7Jndax409CYg3U.html

bruce lee Deus vult!

whats does it means? god wills it? dieu le veut?

Yes, god wills it

There are no gods

@@theotterguy *CRUSADERS WANT TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION*

A comment about the quality of the vid? Are you sure you're not lost, sir?

JajajaJjajanaja

@@JLrapel492 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7Jndax409CYg3U.html

They were as tolerant as any invader could be, by paying a fare you could just believe whatever you wanted. The sultans knew that avoiding unrest and revolts was not gained through harsh treatment, all the locals were Christian, so it was a good idea to just let them be, but the initial conquest was rough, and Europe feared further expansion into the West. (Wich would have probably happened). So all it took was a pope to call the arms. Plus, medieval lords loved dat loot.

@@pabloramos1022 Well spoken. I wish more people thought like you rather than screaming "DEUS VULT" all over the place.

Mrhomeless78 source or you are wrong.

Yes

The roman empire got Split

They were more Greek than Roman at that point

@@liljs4189 The Eastern part of the Roman Empire was always more Greek than Latin. Roman Empire in general was Greek on a very big part. Northern invaders who conquered the west weren't though and that's why we have the image of a Latin only Roman Empire. Nobody from the west wanted to anyone believe the Empire still existed on the east.

DEUS VULT!!!!

You're a crusader Harry

The Muslims : just this once

gerlok wolkenbrutzler deus vult

Does he really?

gerlok wolkenbrutzler ما شاء الله

DEUS VULT

ALLAHU AKBAR!

Deus vult DEUS VULT

this is true Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult Deus vult

There are no gods

@@theotterguy Your right, there’s only one true God. Deus Vult

@@theotterguy How do you know anyhow ? Ever heard of Pascal's Wager ?

The battle of Stirling was on a bridge, not out in the open for one.

@Katarina Love In reality Wallace was able to destroy his opponent (who had beter training, equipment and larger numbers) by trapping a large part of them on muddy terrain between his army and the river. In the movie he used this amazing new invention: THE POINTY STICK. (Not even real spears, just sharpened sticks fresh from the tree.)

@@mathy1799 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7Jndax409CYg3U.html

fucking wardens

DAUBENY!!!

Yeah, but that was all on the level, political stuff. The level of infighting within polities of each religious group (when such polities existed) was usually equivalent or greater in the time period being described.

Hope915 There was major friction at every level of society. All three of these religions identities are premised on the others being wrong. All three believed they were a chosen people

Hope915 I would advise you against revisionism just because our modern goals are multicultural

No genocides

Of course they had to find a way to give more rights to the majority that they had conquered and in many cases brutally killed raped beaten and forced to convert.

Christians and Jews were in Dhimmitude under Muslim "peace", barely above slaves and bottom class citizens. Some peace.

Jessei Mae Sy deus vult pañero

Nothing to be be proud about your people being raped and forced converted.

@@doublem1975x Really man? Is that relevant?

@@dominicguye8058 Yes, yes it is.

lmao ok crowderhead

Yes, tell that to christians they slaughtered.

Arm3nia91 Those where different times. Before the crusades, Islam was considered to be just a hieretical branch of Christianity... So just a bunch of people believing in similar stuff. The conflict arose from more political reasons, the nobles of Europe feared a change in the balance of power, since sultanated were quite the warmongers and Byzantium was a chill and diplomatic...

You're not too smart

I think they were just marching one infront of the other, with scouts and messengers exchange between the armies

@@ulrichleukam1068 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7Jndax409CYg3U.html

Muslims had to pay zakah and sadaqah

@@shareefqb and yet it had nothing to do with religion ? You're contradicting yourself in less than 2 sentences lmao

ScarFail although in the battle of manzikert the byzantines fought against seltzuk turks ,I cant deny the fact tha both seljuks and ottomans come from the same place.be more accurate my friend.

@@truegrit1860 Indeed they do just that.

Retarior compared to muslims christians and jews in europe.. yeah they co existed unlike the massacre of jews by Christians