I think Ford could ve made a 5.4l DOHC V8 with modular architecture or a 6.2l Modular DOHC V8 The 6.8l OHV ll be fine.. but GM has already perfected LT motors and I don't think Fords 6.8l ll be better n a Mustang than GM LT1s For 1. The LT1s still are lighter and smaller than Godzilla and if this 6.8l s based n the 7.3 I wud be slightly disappointed because frankly I didn't like this engine, it felt lazy below 3000 rpm and even post that it revved slower than GM LT motors and felt more like a truck motor and much less like a sporty motor. Even by best stock LT standards the 6.8s best possible outputs may be 540 PS and 505 ft pounds torque, a 6.2l DOHC wud ve made 560-570 PS and 470-480 ft pounds torque, wud ve revved fasted and wud ve been a better match for a Mustang

I disagree. I rather enjoy the govs of torque the 7.3 liter has, doesn't feel lazy at all...Did you try the Tremor configuration with 4.30 gears? Makes a big difference. You're correct that the engine is made for a truck and tuned for logetivity and pulling. It would still be badass in a mustang; akin to the Viper V10 8.4 liter...so much torque

@@ReticentIndignation See there is a reason why motors are based on HP/L and not at all mentioned in torque/L. And there is a reason why OHC is widely used for sports cars 1. Crank speeds. Unless you make cranks with very low weight yet strong shafts, an OHV will always spin at lower speeds than an OHC, the lower speed of spinning however is with a less graded positive torque graph meaning. Its super strong but slow to get to peak. With OHC with the same crank tech it spins faster as there is less parts for pull up. Thus reaching peak s easier and faster. As per cosworth performance the GM LT1 in C7 Grand Sport takes 4.6s to raise from 2k to 6.4k rpm whereas a Ford 5.0 takes just 3.6s to raise from 2k to a higher redline of 7.4k which means if both of these engines are delivering same HP but OHC s at a lower torque would still to more work than an OHC at same HP and higher torque provided both machines are put in a machine that weighs same 2. With modern super fast automatics and dual mass flywheels and all. Gearing is extremely important. The split determines how much is available at each gear.. the 5.0s were geared more for mpg and thats why they didn't perform that better.. but with the A10 the S550 Gen IIs ve done much better, now my only wish is to make that S550 platform lighter.. but there is a new 1 coming and it seems to be more focused on Hybrid tech so no signs of low weight as of now. Thats why I feel 6.8l wud be ok.. but if Ford still has an option for a sub 2200 lbs chassis like the Alpha platform in GM which weighs just 2070 lbs an OHC would perform far better than an OHV n that case

Except there is no 6.8L coming for the Mustang lol the Union representative made a mistake confirmed by RevenEvan.

@@Jimmyxsx but why.. there s somethin going on.. some new engine definitely in works.. Donno which or its specifics

Should be a good mountain pulling truck too.

Procharger all day.

@@Make-Asylums-Great-Again makes boost too late for the engine to take full advantage of the power band

@@streetslayers410 The choice between the two is only about when you want the power to come in. The whipple will come on lower but the procharger will be stronger higher up. Towing? I'll take the whipple all day. Gapping nerds at the track? Procharger.

Not really if you realize that the stock 3.5 eco walks and beats this with its little stock turbos and with upgraded makes over 700whp

Pro charger*

Who is pulling you home?

We need more data on IATs to make a really solid determination.

You said Super Duty and depend on and boost. Clearly you don't know shit about Stupor Duties.

D-1X coming in about a month.

@@SVTPerformance you’re really speaking my language!

Eaton 3100 coming soon

I love Procharger. My first almost 20 years ago was a D3-R that I got to play with but for a truck I think a KB or Whipple is a better option because of how the power curve works. You want that instant boost you can't beat from a positive displacement blower.

Use the Eaton TVS R2650 from the GT500 & C7 ZR1. 2.7 liters of factory reliability right there.

Yooo, imagine the heads that man will develop for this beast 😨🔥

Drunk people??? We had an issue with the mic, so this is what we had to work with. It'll be better next time.

@@SVTPerformance just yanking you chain....sort of. I had my headset on and turned up a good bit when the wind noise blasted my earholes, this just makes me want a turbo 7.3 in my 84 Mustang coupe more and more now

While it did make that much. It was a fully built motor with rods, pistons, intake, cam, ported heads etc. Although with basically a cam and intake it make just under 600hp. So it shouldn't be hard to make 1000hp+ if you can make about 18psi on the stock motor. Change the cam and it becomes easier. Specially if you add the intake too. That will move the rpm range higher allowing the blower to spin harder. Regardless this motor will love the boost.

@@waynebollentin989 Well I think Fords Godzilla is not as potent as GM LT motor. Its too damn heavy too at 650 lbs I think Ford could ve made a DOHC 6.2l instead of this

@@1989rs500 your off by more than 100lbs on weight.

@@waynebollentin989 I am talking engine + support accessories If U take dry engine weight alone its 538 lbs, the 5.0 weighs 440 lbs, a 6.8 wud weigh around 500 lbs, a 5.4l Modular V8 might weigh around 476 lbs and might be just as large as a 6.8l V8 hence my thought that 5.4 DOHC would be a right match for S650 Mustang. A 6.2 in modular architecture will anyway weigh over 500 lbs. Maybe 540 lbs but wud perform in another level even if its against a 7.3l OHV V8

@@1989rs500 the 538lbs was with the accessories. It had the intake with throttle body, water pump, pulleys, balancer. So please feel free to explain where 112lbs your talking about is coming from to get it to 650lbs. It's obviously not a light motor, special compared to say a coyote but it's much lighter than say a Ford 460BB. That said it's about the same as an iron block ls platform. Remember the 7.3 is not aluminum block. It's an iron block engine.

Got'em on the hole shot. :)

It might squeak out a little more on corn, but to see some real gains it needs a bigger blower and more RPM.

@@SVTPerformance Ethanol will help with running out of timing too. You can shove it in a lot earlier. I’d imagine a good jump in the low end with a sweet fuel with higher octane.

ROFLMAO! Yeah. "E85" with half the energy content by "volume" so you have to burn twice as much in the same amount of time to make the same "horsepower". The higher the "octane" the harder the fuel is to light and keep lit and the less "power" it contains. "E85 tunes" in Ford BOAT ANCHORS "makes power" because it keeps those pieces of shit running cold, rich, overfueled and out of "spark knock". Then there's the fact that the "tuner" can "make power" in/on any fucking vehicle on the "chassis dyno" without even getting up from the dyno console just by "tuning" the DYNO CALIBRATION AND "CORRECTION FACTORS". You Fordtards just BEG to get bent over and cornholed by "tuners" because you know EVERYTHING about "making power" except how clueless you ACTUALLY ARE.

@@deeremeyer1749 I mean it works for the Coyote. Given it’s a higher compression motor you’ll reach a point you’ll need the higher octane fuel. If you stay on pump gas you’re asking for trouble past 750 wheel on a 5.0. I’d assume this motor wouldn’t be much different.

@@deeremeyer1749 you sound like you been huffing some E85 mixed with meth....

You won't have to deal with all the diesel emissions equipment...

But in retrospect, still roughly half the torque of a diesel with cheaper mods.

@@SVTPerformance I don't deal with them lol, d3l3ted lol

The days of that being a simple and easily accessible solution are long gone.

@@SVTPerformance Frankly speaking Ford has a long way to be close to GM LT motors. The 7.3 Godzilla feels like its a generation behind GM LT1s. With supercharger and that kind of displacement and 8 psi boost it should ve been n 650 HP range

According to 5 Star's testing 8 psi is about all this unit is good for. Didn't see much gain above 8. Need the bigger one for higher boost

Wasn't to sure since they went straight from 8 to 12 pounds of boost. But it makes sense.

Your understanding of bypass valve function is incorrect.

@@SVTPerformance yours is

@@baby-sharkgto4902 Care to share a single scholarly source that supports your claim?

Doing this will void your factory warranty just adding a tune to the truck voids the warranty.

Yet spanked by a simple little 3.5 with stock turbos still!lol..

@@markim5087 Keep smoking 🚬 crack. The 250 weight is about 8 grand. The 150 is about 6500. Shut up Clown 🤡 That's not even the best system for it. There's one place making about 800 HP natural and is going to make a 1000 HP in the next build. Get you some of that Smartass !!

Because that's not the kit that procharger is selling.

But they do.... you can specify any combo of blower and pulley.

Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.

You'll def need new calibrations for any blower. This truck retains a stock'ish suspension because it's used to gather a lot of testing data. You want as few variables as possible when testing mods.

Option 3 - Coyote

lq9. durable iron block with a massive aftermarket. ls parts are everywhere.

Wish we could, watch the entire vid to see why we didn't.

D-1X upgrade on the way.

Centrifugal is the way to go.

But you can't buy a Whipple for the 7.3 ...yet.

It can pull 15k pounds and doesn't explode if you look at it wrong???

Yet that chevy 632 only made a fraction of the power the mighty 811 cubic inch Hemi puts out🤣

@@Jimmyxsx You are correct. The 632 and the 811 are very exciting engines. The only thing that is exciting about the 7.3L is that the big blocks are on their way back. 500 ish Hp is small block power with minimal upgrading and the torque doesn't even come close to the diesel that it's competing with. 100 Hp per liter is factory now days. That engine should be able to produce 730 hp before mods or at least dam close.

But unlike Chevy motors this one won’t shit it’s cookies

@@jamesward4893 You have absolutely no data to back up either statement. Try Googleing what car manufacturer won the most races then look at who is second and then look the difference. Or you can simply remain ignorant. Your choice.

@@wilsterone6689 So since Chevy is so much better than Ford, tell me how many LeMans victories Chevy has, Ford only has 5 of them and a few triple crown wins. I’ll save you some time, Chevy (GM) has none and neither does Dodge. GM has been bailed out twice by the taxpayers because they build garbage, Ford has never been bailed out. So before you start calling people ignorant maybe you shouldn’t be ignorant yourself.

It's coming.

Dual batteries on the 7.3 is an option.

Let me know when you find a Coyote powered Super Duty.

It's set up for a truck not for a race car genius.

@@johnjames5020 never once referred to a race car. There's stock sealed (manifold to oil pan) coyote powered trucks in the 8's. And over a 1000 hp at the tire. Like I said still has a long way to go

How you think this Supercharged 7.3 gas would do compared to a 7.3 diesel engine towing?

Have they switched to a updated part yet?

@@SMiller5488 nope.

@@davidchristopher5976 not good

@@SMiller5488 no it isn't.

The days of rollin coal on a new street truck are long gone.

Bro it's a gas engine

IAT's will not see temps above 120. The intercooler will cool.temps before they enter the manifold....

Not true at all.

@@bootlegger2389 Sorry to burst your bubble, but yes it will. Just text my brother (30 year Ford heavy line mechanic) and he said the warranty would be toast.

@@xXFrankieIrishXx just had warranty work done, and my F150 is procharged. Techs have to prove that bolt on was the reson for the failure.

*reason

PD blowers take a lot more time and money to design for each new application. We'll see them eventually.

You wouldn't want to use a PD blower for towing. This isn't a race truck. Procharger won't heat soak as much and its less stress on the engine.

Whipple said they are almost done with theirs. They have the lower manifold designed and casted which was the hard part, they said that earlier today on a live video.

PD blower is good for 2 passes..... then you gotta let it cool off unless youre running meth.

@@bootlegger2389 Stop spreading falsities

This engine passed the extreme duty cycle, it is made for maximum continuous load, not max power...

Reliability

@@SMiller5488 You need the power and the torque in order to haul large heavy loads. Pulling a 10,000 lb horse trailer with living quarters and 3 quarter horses up hills, you will wish you have more power because instead of moving forward, you will stall on the hill or start going backwards.

Cummins, Powerstrokes, and Duramax's haven't got 20mpg since 2007 before the emissions BS. If you get a 1k HP diesel to get 20mpg, please post it here with proof

@@codyhannah1451 lies.

i think the whole new motor is a huge step backwards... i also think a p1 procharger is to small for that motor.

Do you want peak power in a pickup or reliable, useable power?.... They even said in the video the P1 was undersized for this engine...

@@sorryociffer yup i heard that the p1 was to small after i commented. in my opinion if 7.3L dont give you enough tq without a blower just go diesel.😄 diesel is way better suited for towing and they last much longer. unless some sorcery is done with the smaller aluminum block version for the next gen mustang (assuming its what will be in them) that will be a big let down for me. it will be heavier than the coyote i think and not respond to mods as well. i could be dead wronge however. im just impressed what those 4v 5.0's can do. i would love to see a 7.3L 4v though😳

@@jasonwoody8041 Agreed. Diesel all the way IF you are going to work the snot out of it. That said, 90-95% of most people would likely be better served with the 7.3. It’s what I would buy. I did the diesel way back and wouldn’t bother today...

@@sorryociffer well, with the new DEF systems that diesels come with now i would hace a hard time buying one too. it causes nothing but issues with our local delivery semi trucks

That's what she said.

Driver is full of it lol

Unfortunately you’re right

You're right! But trump is gonna pull it out. Watermarked official ballots!

@@DigitalCourseDetective well trump took an L today🤣

@@Jimmyxsx you don't understand what's going on in the background. Trump will win in the courts. The media doesn't decide who's president.

@@DigitalCourseDetective trump lost

Is anything?

That’s not a junky LS motor lol

@@jamesward4893 👍

You’re probably going have to drive at least 300,000 (possibly way more) to recoup that up front cost.

They can get a little rough in places.