TOP 10 EXPERIMENTAL Canard AIRPLANES
Рет қаралды 527,298
Күн бұрын10 of the greatest canard airplane designs of all time. Canards are fast, fuel efficient, and beautiful. Featuring some of the best homebuilt experimental airplanes flying today.
LIKE and SUBSCRIBE!
MERCH STORE
teespring.com/stores/floridaflyingmerch
MUSIC
soundcloud.com/islandpark
Video Credits - Some of these weren’t actually used but they are still awesome videos! Subscribe to them!
Varieze
• Parker VariEz 47VE at I68
• Rutan Long-EZ
• 10/13/12 Rutan Varieze...
• VariEze springtime lan...
• Test Flying the VariEz...
• Varieze For Sale. Flyb...
Long-EZ
• Chasing Catbird
• Rutan Long EZ
/ 972929212771095
/ 10100100383093645
/ 10214521632579087
• Kyle Fowler - Long-EZ ...
Gyroflug Speed Canard
/ 10202245298428122
• Speed Canard Gyroflug ...
• Speed Canard
Berkut
• Berkut - The Video
/ 2267091173547253
• Berkut 13: Low Approac...
• Berkut 13: Low Approac...
Quickie q1
• Flying the Quickie
• A-8 Quickie
• Quickie D-EHCV 1984 As...
• Quickie Q1 Miami Unive...
Quickie q2
• Quickie Tri-Q200 - 360...
• [HD] Beautiful Quickie...
• Quickie Q200 N202SH ta...
• Quickie Q2 Q200 Fly b...
Velocity
• Velocity N44VF First F...
• Velocity Aircraft buil...
• IMG 9448 MOV
Twin velocity
• Video
• Velocity V-Twin AOPA T...
• 2014 June 30 Velocity ...
Rutan defiant
/ 1681763472112927
• CSA Rough River Fly-by...
• Mark's Defiant Canard ...
• Burt Rutan in Reaching...
• Forrest Wilson's Defia...
• Defiant canard airplan...
Falcon ultralight
• Roy Dodson Flying Maid...
/ 10210215816088756
• Bruce Benton Falcon Ul...
• Falcon UL ultralight t...
• Falcon xp fly over san...
@FloridaFlying 3 жыл бұрын
Which one is your favorite?? I can’t pick one, but I like the Long EZ, quickie q2, and Velocity
@larrysouthern5098 3 жыл бұрын
Long EZ....bar none....
@alfepalfe 3 жыл бұрын
My favorite is the saab ajs 37 viggen delta canard (you never said it had propeller powered or have more than one airworthy unit)
@dspellman2002 3 жыл бұрын
I like the Berkut 540.
@thomascastleman6654 3 жыл бұрын
Q1, but I'm biased.
@AlejandroIrausquin 3 жыл бұрын
@@alfepalfe the inspiration for the Rutan VariViggen!
@garretttinker5954 3 жыл бұрын
I love these types of videos
@Tubesmaney 3 жыл бұрын
I love that you have examples of the aircraft you are discussing shot doing low passes.
@jamesharber7820 3 жыл бұрын
Sir, very good presentation. Thank you!
@kairege9332 3 жыл бұрын
Another great video.
@z-productionsnon-commentar1385 3 жыл бұрын
great video!
@rdragonsheridan 3 жыл бұрын
Great job!!
@daveriley6310 3 жыл бұрын
I liked that you saved mention of the original Wright Flyer until last. Of course, I also liked that the VariEze was first. I have one now, my 2nd VariEze. Incredible efficiency and visibility.
@FloridaFlying 3 жыл бұрын
That is great, how much HP does yours have? Electric or hand prop? I think one day I’d have a long ez or varieze for traveling. Such cool planes.
@daveriley6310 3 жыл бұрын
@@FloridaFlying 100 hp, elec. start. Pretty much a standard Cont. O-200 as in a C-150.
@lukasethan6429 Жыл бұрын
Respect. I see you’re wearing a starship shirt. They build them here in Wichita, Kansas, and I actually worked in the plant they built them at, although it was years later. Beechcraft and Raytheon was my first journey into aviation manufacturing. I later became a excellent fabricator and 2nd level manager at Boeing and then Spirit Aerosystems. Finished my aircraft voyage at GE aviation, and then is subsequent small aircraft company. It’s nice being reminded of the awesome aviation history that I grew up around and didn’t even realize call unique it was. Thank you very much.
@beng3428 3 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@speedomars3869 2 жыл бұрын
There are now Velocity XLs with 375hp engines and one was built with a jet-prop engine. The XL is their flagship...the twin was meant to be a safer plane to fly at night and uses the same 4-seat airframe (with an added tail section) but it is slower and less fuel efficient than the XL. Velocity has a 3-year back-order queue attesting to the popularity of the aircraft.
@pauldiaco3817 3 жыл бұрын
Got to see a Starship fly at Sun 'N Fun back in '93. Beautiful.
@bricefleckenstein9666 3 жыл бұрын
It's unfortunate that most of those got broken up by Beech instead of sold.
@carlosbolivar5935 3 жыл бұрын
The Rutan brothers were a hell of a team ! The voyager deserves an episode ! Saludos desde Colombia 🇨🇴
@netzer7739 3 жыл бұрын
top post !!!!!!
@robertweekley5926 Жыл бұрын
In 1986, when they flew it unrefueled, nonstop, around the world, I was in California, but, I was on the Coast that day, South if San Jose`, in Capitola, California, when they Landed in Mojave! I bought a Couple Newspapers with the Story! Still have them!
@lovetofly32 2 жыл бұрын
The beechcraft starship is the one I had in mind. Got to sit in the cockpit of one when i was like 13 at beechcraft where my uncle worked. That velocity twin sure reminded me of it.
@fredford7642 Жыл бұрын
GREAT! Video1
@Fsrjtyttzma 3 жыл бұрын
LE...10 Hours that’s impressive!
@Kneedragon1962 3 жыл бұрын
When Rutan was at Beech, developing the Starship, they made a test unit that had the full size & full power turboprops, but it was otherwise a 7/8 scale model. It didn't have flaps and it didn't have the silly hydraulic yaw damper, and it's weight was more like half what a finished production Starship was. Everybody who ever flew it, loved it. It was fast, it handled beautifully, it wouldn't stall, it was more than capable of doing beginner level aerobatics. It could fly safely at 60 knots and with full back-stick as low as about 55, and it would touch 300 at altitude. It was somewhat under-weight & over-powered but it was the most magnificent aeroplane to fly. It had room for passenger seats in the cabin but I'm not sure they ever installed any. The name 'Starship One' was later coined for production versions but inside the shop. 'Starship One' meant that 7/8s model. That was a magnificent aeroplane. It just worked better in every way than it should have.
@gormauslander 2 жыл бұрын
I'm told the people who fly the full production model also love them, but I can see how this lighter model would have been awesome to have
@kenmenees5197 Жыл бұрын
I remember as a Aircraft Mechanic working at Addison Airport(north of Dallas) a Airshow going on and Starship One (the 7/8 Proto) on Final approach, gliding in, and a small slow ac, like a 152 taking off on the same runway very slow, then the Starship Punched the throttles and spinning away( I'm sure just part of the show) and came around again and landed. it made a Huge impression on that once Young Aircraft Mechanic, Still Fascinated with Canards, I just retired after 37 + years at American Airlines, I remember this like it happened yesterday, but it was in the mid 80's !
@The_la_spotter 2 жыл бұрын
Great video! The Berkut is built at my local airport! They use it for crazy training from a company called Red 6.
@jonathanfunnell4167 3 жыл бұрын
LOVE THESE AIRPLANES LOVE ALL AIRPLANES
@joelgarcia-rivera2093 2 жыл бұрын
Very nice
@lucywucyyy 3 жыл бұрын
man i love rutans planes, i wish more people could think out of the box like him
@MartinSage 2 жыл бұрын
I wish they still sold the kits today. ( Detail plans + materials costed under $10,000). I just saw an ad for an unopened box with everything inside except motor in England for cheap. Some guy bought it but died before building it. Shipping would be expensive though🤑
@danielmaloney128 3 жыл бұрын
I love these airplanes
@tobuslieven Жыл бұрын
4:00 I love tandem wing designs like the Rutan Quickie. Would love to hear more about them.
@petrsedlak4761 Жыл бұрын
Well tandem wings are very dangerous in stall. Stall recovery with such large lifting wing in front is almost impossible. Maybe this is why almost nobody use such design.
@macrumpton 3 жыл бұрын
The quickie seems like a good candidate for electric flight with it's low power requirement.
@IdiotWithEducation 3 жыл бұрын
Sounds like it needs a different name lol
@michaellowe3665 3 жыл бұрын
@@IdiotWithEducation he could have called it a truck stop special.
@IdiotWithEducation 3 жыл бұрын
@@michaellowe3665 lol
@curve5746 2 жыл бұрын
@@michaellowe3665 lol
@AClark-gs5gl 2 жыл бұрын
Indeed.
@christophermcdaniel9492 3 жыл бұрын
OMG The Quickie is the deal! With the low HP and all you get! Just waiting for all the electric planes!
@ErikssonTord_2 2 жыл бұрын
Electric propulsion would probably revive the model as the Quickie is infamous for its engine-out accidents.
@Stormworks_maker_of_things 3 жыл бұрын
Lookin for a plane, love canards!
@jpfloors1 2 жыл бұрын
I just love how rare my airplane is and that it didn’t even make the honorable mention list. 😁 Viking Dragonfly MK-1.
@wadeadams2775 Жыл бұрын
I've loved that plane for decades
@cbbbbbbbbbbbb 2 ай бұрын
I have a Quickie Q1 mostly built that I'm finishing, but I would love to get my hands on a Velocity. Can't wait to get it in the air!
@rileyswing9731 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome video! Would love to take you for a ride sometime in Sebastian!
@FloridaFlying 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I’m going to take you up on that offer, I’ve always loved the velocity models!
@gaips 9 ай бұрын
The Red 6 is amazing
@hiraadnan5062 3 жыл бұрын
I don't understand. You should have atleast 5M subscribers, you have great content 🍅🖒
@UA10i12 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome Video. Please list fuel efficiency as well. Thank you.
@natepate6117 3 жыл бұрын
Cool plane . I’ll get some merch soon when I can afford
@rogerlabarr8578 Жыл бұрын
QUICKY has a nice aerodynamic design with its ground effects efficiency.
@eliasrodriguez4179 3 жыл бұрын
Here in Argentina The Falcon ultralight is very famous!
@DANTHETUBEMAN 2 жыл бұрын
These remind me of the Horton Brothers 229 flying wing. My favorite plane.
@cyyxc 3 жыл бұрын
Beatiful
@aleksandrnestrato Жыл бұрын
Velocity, yeah!🤘 Though the true love is the Starship for sure! It's the THE.
@strode66 3 жыл бұрын
Best freebie ever for your brothers mate.🛬
@notazip6814 Жыл бұрын
Saw a Defiant in Boca ration fl . Awe inspiring
@imtruth69 3 жыл бұрын
What. Not even a mention of a very good plane called the Dragonfly? I loved mine. Can not believe you completely left it out.
@FloridaFlying 3 жыл бұрын
I do like the dragonfly, but I think it’s a more tame version of the quickie. I really don’t know too much about it. I think it’s landing gear is a better way to do it though
@imtruth69 3 жыл бұрын
@@FloridaFlying Thanks for the reply. The one thing I like about the dragonfly is that it has side by side seating.
@oneskydog6768 2 жыл бұрын
@@jimmybalsam3696 Completly wrong. The Q1 was inspiration for the Q2 built by Larue in Canada. The Dragonfly was also inspired by the Q1 but is not a copy of the Q1 or Q2. Different wing loading and power loading, construction and assembly details. Like saying Piper Cub and a Stinson are copies.
@zac1157 3 жыл бұрын
You got a great show. Any chance you'd do one about flying wings...?
@natepate6117 3 жыл бұрын
Love your logo! Trying to incorporate the state into my logo? But there’s so many hick Florida merchants out there we need a way to class it up? Born and raised
@larrysouthern5098 3 жыл бұрын
The Velocity is on my bucketlist...looks good and it looks like a good cross country aircraft!!! I've seem some in cockpit videos and it looks like ablast to Fly!!! 🐦🐦🐦
@speedomars3869 2 жыл бұрын
Both Velocities are cross-country flyers. They have range and power and both versions can be equipped with turbo'd engines for higher flying. They are also equipped with built-in oxygen systems. They do lack de-icing though.
@brownlee62534 Жыл бұрын
Me too. But at 72 I'm not building one and they are justifiably mighty spendy once built. I heard an F-15 pilot say his Velocity flew much like his F-15 feel wise.
@CFinley25 3 жыл бұрын
5:30 and 5:42 are of my Father, tail number N314JF, taking off and landing at E98... I need to get around to posting some of the videos I have of his Subaru powered Q2...
@robertshamblin4734 3 жыл бұрын
The xp-55 was an experimental canard aircraft, developed during ww2
@GregoryACross 3 жыл бұрын
There is one prototype left in existance. It can be seen at the Kalamazoo Air Zoo, in Kalamazoo, Michigan. www.airzoo.org/wwii?xmod-623-pp-318630-item=6315
@ahashdahnagila6884 3 жыл бұрын
Hands down, the Wright Flyer! (The first canard ever!)
@EpikArms 3 жыл бұрын
Nice my dad has that canard plane its a quicke, just not sure wich model
@realsushi_official1116 10 ай бұрын
Velocity twin is impressive and currently produced. Very interesting insta btw.
@samvelez5549 3 жыл бұрын
Waiting for the new Velocity V-twin 6 passenger!
@user-wangyu Жыл бұрын
that is sure efficient
@johnsteichen5239 6 ай бұрын
There are over 35 flying Defiants with some still being built. It is the King of Canards. I know because I built one and ran the newsletter for 15 years.
@delschier1419 2 жыл бұрын
My favorite is my Cozy IV, 200 mph cruise @ 30 mpg, four seats and 1500 ml range with reserve. I owned a LongEZ before. Where I are you in Florida, I am in North FL.
@Robert-mn8gc 3 ай бұрын
❤ the Quickie Q2
@AClark-gs5gl 2 жыл бұрын
I would really like to do with the Q-200, what Velocity did with the Rutan LongEz.
@ZZstaff 3 жыл бұрын
Burt Rutan designed and produced some remarkable aircraft including the Beechcraft Starship and space craft.
@jimreilly6933 3 жыл бұрын
He was a genius who had his invention copied over and over with not a penny in compensation.
@agoetz64 3 жыл бұрын
@@jimreilly6933 Definitely one of the finest aerospace engineers I have ever seen!
@agoetz64 3 жыл бұрын
@@jimreilly6933 Definitely one of the finest aerospace engineers I have ever seen!
@gormauslander 3 жыл бұрын
When I saw the way the fore landing gear was mounted on the quickie, I honestly loved it instantly. I'd love to see it used more often
@gormauslander 3 жыл бұрын
@Alfons Falkhayn Well yeah, if that's what you're going to be doing often it makes sense to use a rugged design. However, it is old and seeing something new is refreshing, and If you intend to only land on asphalt, I wouldn't mind using it
@arthurfoyt6727 2 жыл бұрын
Imagine an engine-out situation where you lad off airport. The gear grabs and the plane trows you over onto the canopy. Try getting out with the plane ontop of you. NO THANKS!
@gormauslander 2 жыл бұрын
@@arthurfoyt6727 why would you be flying a light plane like this so far from civilization that you can't find a road to land on
@arthurfoyt6727 2 жыл бұрын
@@gormauslander LOL, "civilization" is removing airports at an alarming rate due to real estate prices. There are less airports every week. Landing on a road means power lines, traffic signs, bridges, cars, trucks, busses, etc. Basically YOU ARE SCREWED if you land off-airport in a Q or Q2.
@gormauslander 2 жыл бұрын
@@arthurfoyt6727 any light plane with small wheels could suffer snagging if you try to land it in a marsh. What makes this aircraft uniquely dangerous?
@douglundy5755 Жыл бұрын
Yep, also the Dragonfly, the original Quickie prototype I think I recall.
@johnlang3198 10 ай бұрын
I think the dragonfly came afterwards. It had longer wings with less anhedral on the forward wing. I believe it was powered by smaller engines such as the revmaster and VW, as well as HAPI. Slower than Q2
@perehortes1228 3 жыл бұрын
I've been listening to your comments requesting more footage of engine rooms and crew quarters, so in tomorrow's video of the astonishing Pershing 80 "Lounor" I take a far more thorough look at the yacht. I'm also especially pleased with some of the running shots, they really give an impression of the speed and handling of the yacht! I plan to publish it tomorrow at 10:00 CET.
@andrerousseau5730 Жыл бұрын
Do a video on the Megane MachBuster.
@user-fg4lk8ri1l 2 жыл бұрын
Спасибо за материал!!! "Утку" давно полюбил!!! Но время пролетело, одна мечта осталась. Пришлось швертбот создать.
@philipwolf3619 Жыл бұрын
Beachfront starship +++
@JimmyEatDirt 3 жыл бұрын
4:15 that's neat, I wonder what the engine costs though 4:23 oh... HOLY HECK
@jimr3633 3 жыл бұрын
Avanti is beautiful. I think they are really loud, though!
@ErikssonTord_2 2 жыл бұрын
Extremely, as the flow over the wing is assymetric and thus impinges the propellers flow at different angles above and below the wing creating much more noise that similar-sized conventional twins. Same was true for the Starship, also a lovely-looking plane.
@mysticvirgo9318 Жыл бұрын
no mention of Rutan's Variviggen?
@Drunken_Hamster 2 жыл бұрын
The Velocity V-twin scaled up to 8-12 seats and a walkable cabin in turboprop or turbofan form would be an awesome sexy option for wealthy execs and other high rollers.
@speedomars3869 2 жыл бұрын
Velocity is working on a 6-seater version of the twin...no larger though.
@ashokranasatsangtopovanvid935 3 жыл бұрын
I am from India your any video I like
@burtonporter8437 3 жыл бұрын
I just want a varieze that’s nice and simple
@natepate6117 3 жыл бұрын
This guy Canard had I serious vision
@heathb4319 2 ай бұрын
I had a Canardly dog for a while. Every time someone asked what it was i said that is a full blooded canardly. I canardly tell what it is.
@microcolonel Жыл бұрын
It'd be interesting to see the front rudder design again, but with downward/bidirectional winglet stabs on the main surface... this way you could conceivably put both the front and rear gear inside flight surfaces on already rigid members, and have tricycle gear. :+ )
@spinnetti 3 жыл бұрын
What about the dragonfly?
@alainremi267 4 ай бұрын
Great job !!! I'm looking for two issues of an amateur airplane builder magasine around the year 1985 (?) where a gentleman built a twin seat Quickie Q2 to fly from central USA to visit his sons on the West Coast... If anybody remember where those articles were published, please let me know. Muchas gracias 😀😀😀
@SouthernMoonIsGood 6 ай бұрын
9:10 YES, MY FAVORITE AIRCRAFT IS HERE!!!!
@jeffpontius50 Жыл бұрын
400 hours in a Cozy. Fun but dangerous airplane
@felixnauta 3 жыл бұрын
Just "one" problem with canard wings: visibility. Anyways, a useful video.
@marksmovies6191 3 жыл бұрын
Well, having flown a Long EZ i can tell you that you can only see the very tips of the canard, basically all you can see of the plane is the instrument panel and your legs if you look down. The visibility is like sitting on the tip of an arrow, you can see up, down and all around, nothing else comes close.
@brandoncowan2133 Жыл бұрын
Where can I find a used canard for sale tho? I’ve looked everywhere
@alanhale5505 Жыл бұрын
You mentioned the falcon was part 103 no license required, but for those that won’t pass the medical,( in my case because of a dui , years ago ) I wish you could point out which are sport pilot capable, I’d believe because of the cruise speed most would not, but I do love Routan’s canard design, elegance, efficiency, performance, I surprised more builders dident follow the platform, I digress, are any of the fore mentioned sport pilot capable?
@IsThisAvailable550 3 жыл бұрын
Wow, I'm 60 this year Why did I not know most of these even existed.....
@larrysouthern5098 3 жыл бұрын
I don't know Larry...but with a name like your.s..I'll let you slide this time!!!!!....🐦
@ahashdahnagila6884 3 жыл бұрын
@Larry ...Because you were only a 14-year-old kid, in 1975!
@BobCat981 3 жыл бұрын
I'll take number 8 pls. Thank you!
@vn894 Жыл бұрын
Вася, новый ГЕРАНЬ!
@videoviewer2008 Жыл бұрын
You can still buy Cozy Mark IV kits from Aircraft Spruce, that should have made the list for sure.
@jamesrogers7174 2 жыл бұрын
My brother and his wife built a Long EZ, mid '80s, real crowd pleaser, donated to Southern Museum of Flight, just finished a Van's RV-14
@ErikssonTord_2 2 жыл бұрын
Your brother built the Van's?!
@christophermcdaniel9492 3 жыл бұрын
Any engine cooling issues???
@956884266 3 жыл бұрын
I hope one is at EAA next year!!!!!!
@user-wm5rx1lz4h Жыл бұрын
アメリカ横断ウルトラクイズの優勝賞品になった事もある機体ですよね！懐かしい。
@imtruth69 3 жыл бұрын
The only canard I have ever flown was the Dragon Fly. It did not pitch nose upon take off like a normal plane. It stayed flat and felt more like riding an elevator.
@cfgosnell Жыл бұрын
Same here. I was at Oshkosh when I was first shown, and I liked it much better than the Q2. Larger and roomier. In the end my concerns about rain performance scuttled my build plans for similar designs, along with the issues of the wide stance gear and running off smaller width runways. Great design, though.
@skyforce2132 3 жыл бұрын
Velocity is my favorite
@tlgibson97 3 жыл бұрын
I've always wanted to build a Velocity XL RG. 4 people, 1000+ mile range at around 200kt. Probably still half the price of a Cessna new. I'll probably never be able to afford one but I'd at least like to fly one before I die.
@speedomars3869 2 жыл бұрын
Go to Sebastian, FL where Velocity is located. They offer flights for a nominal fee.
@es330td 2 жыл бұрын
I knew someone with an RG, N52BZ. It was an amazing plane.
@speedomars3869 2 жыл бұрын
@@es330td Good to hear. I have a Velocity XL5 being built right now. I am going with the Continental TSIO 550-C turbo and a four-blade German made MT-prop MTV-14-B. I am told we may get 250kt cruise in this setup.
@alexojeda4278 Жыл бұрын
Its been my life dream have follow the space cowboy since the discovery or invention & continued development Burth Rutan, been to Lancaster Ca to see more of the grand accomplishment that it's been minimized as to the further development of the voyager into outer space, it's been a giant step o s in the canard design
@hugostiglitz6914 3 жыл бұрын
What I found limits the range of a Longez was not the fuel load but the size of your bladder!😁
@marksmovies6191 3 жыл бұрын
That's what the relief tube is for ;). I understand where you are coming from though, we increased the capacity of the fuel tanks but never were able to sit in that confined position long enough to burn it all.
@brownlee62534 Жыл бұрын
Shouldn't you be flying a BEARKUT Hugo?😂
@mohanakrishnan1150 Жыл бұрын
Wow
@kdrapertrucker Жыл бұрын
I like Rutan's boomerang. But he only built one as his personal aircraft. Twin engine, assymmetical layout
@MartinSage 2 жыл бұрын
There’s a YT of a Quickie Q2 (2 seater) with a O-200 Continental that hit 203 mph. He said he had even more throttle but was scared that the wings might come off unless he beefed up their strength as it was only fiberglass (no metal).
@mikedwyer5326 2 жыл бұрын
I've had my Q200 to 230 mph. No problem.
@blaster-zy7xx Жыл бұрын
Always loved the velocity. But these planes are a thing of the past. I don’t know why.
@victorvodkafish 3 жыл бұрын
Not to forget the Eagle Aircraft 150 ... an Australian designed two-seat single-engine (125hp) composite aircraft. It has three lifting surfaces : forward wing (foreplane), main wing (mainplane) and horizontal stabilizer (tailplane). Originally designed and built by Eagle Aircraft Pty Ltd, and now manufactured in Malaysia. Good pilot visibility.
@daveklingler820 Жыл бұрын
The Eagle was actually designed by American John Roncz, Burt Routan's wing designer.
@ratlips4363 Жыл бұрын
Is that a photo of a Howard 500 on your wall?
@viniciusvale42 3 жыл бұрын
35/5000 Missing from the list was the Viking Dragonfly, Cozy, etc.
@joeywhite7948 3 жыл бұрын
@@jimmybalsam3696 You must be paid to say they were copies. Me and others that did research are not impressed by you or your bs.
@viniciusvale42 3 жыл бұрын
@@joeywhite7948 exactly, I agree with you.
@felsenHome 3 жыл бұрын
Would be great to have some explanations about the flight physics and the specific advantages and disadvantages.
@FloridaFlying 3 жыл бұрын
I think I’m going to do a whole video on that in the future
@leoking6765 3 жыл бұрын
@@FloridaFlying waiting!!
@chuckaddison5134 3 жыл бұрын
So, clear up something if you would please. Is the canard a lift producing structure, or merely a horizontal stabilizer mounted forward? I recall reading, some years ago that the aircraft under discussion in the article shared lift production with the main wing. How would this effect control? I guess I would like to see the video on the physics, issues, and advantages too.
@ahashdahnagila6884 3 жыл бұрын
@@chuckaddison5134 The Quickie, the Q2, (and the Dragonfly, which wasn't shown), and some others are essentially "biplanes", because they produce a significant amount of lift (the canard wing of a Q2, for example, accounts for 40% of the lift). In those aircraft where the canard is small, it functions as the plane's elevator, solely (or, primarily).
@douggraham5812 3 жыл бұрын
@@chuckaddison5134 In a conventional plane, the horizontal stabilizer produces negative lift. In a canard, the stabilizer produces positive lift. This gives the same stabilizing effect, but improves efficiency and allows for a smaller main wing. The canard stalls before the main wing, which drops the nose; the main wing therefore cannot stall.
@rondyson8323 3 жыл бұрын
What happend to the "DRAGONFLY" My brother flew the first one in Australia . I did the signwriting and art work.
@mikeleuchs1326 3 жыл бұрын
what about the dragonfly?
@ahashdahnagila6884 3 жыл бұрын
@Mike Leuchs I always liked the Dragonfly.
Oddly Satisfying
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН
Bryce Builds It All
Рет қаралды 8 М.