The big thing that's missing on this team is scoring. So not giving a long term extension to the most consistent guy on the roster and leading scorer for the team is wrong? That's the dumbest thing I've heard in a long while.

@@Murph_. So, you would sign TK to a long term deal, let's say 8 years with a no trade clause....because that's probably what he'll get...8 years at 8 mil per. Year one of that new contract will be TK's age 29 year. History shows those kind of contracts age very poorly. See Atkinson and Coots. Plus the salary cap implications of said contract. Scoring is not the biggest need for the Flyers. A first line center and first pair Dman are. TK could net valuable assets in a trade that would benefit the team long-term far more than his 25 goals a year. Chew on that genuis.