There is plenty of evidence that President Kennedy was killed by a homestate conspiracy in the homestate of the next President, a Vice President that wanted to be President if you read real history books. WC didn't tell you JFK was the 2nd Presidential homestate assassination after McKinley. Of course they wouldn't have known that Presidential candidate Robert Kennedy was the third.

note how many Kennedy supporters continued to vote for Ted K. after CHAPPAQUIDDICK - - - Late on the night of July 18, 1969, a black Oldsmobile driven by U.S. Senator Edward Kennedy plunged off the Dike Bridge on the tiny island of Chappaquiddick, off Martha’s Vineyard, landing upside down in the tidal Poucha Pond. The 37-year-old Kennedy survived the crash, but the young woman riding with him in the car didn’t. Though newspaper headlines at the time identified her simply as a “blonde,” she was 28-year-old Mary Jo Kopechne, a respected political operative who had worked on the presidential campaign of Senator Kennedy’s brother, Robert Kennedy. How long was Mary Jo Kopechne alive after the car flipped? Kopechne likely did not die instantaneously, but her final moments remain a mystery. When John Farrar, a diver for the local fire department, found Kopechne’s body the morning after the crash, its positioning suggested she had remained alive for an unknown period of time after the car went underwater. Her face was pressed into the footwell, and her hands gripped the back of the front seat, as if she had been trying to push her head into a pocket of air.

That old maxim "it's easier to fool people (conspiracy buffs) than to convince them that they have been fooled, is the key here."

​@@JeffCrow1313That old maxim. It's easier to fool people (Warren Commission supporters) than to convince people they've been fooled.

Just like OJs case. All the evidence and people still didn't believe the obvious.

It's really that strong of a book

Bugliosi was a good lawyer but a weak researcher. James DiEugenio ruthlessly destroys the contents of his book with outstanding research by him and others, you should read it and educate yourself.

@@JfK--OBJECTivE maroon

I did read Posner book and like Bugliosi’s book there both speaking about the lone nut,the nobody wanting Glory but there’s not really anything conclusive that’s with the research I’ve done but I have an open mind however my research has led me to the simple fact that there were two shooters the who what where I don’t know yet but I can prove two shooters.

So, please give us the prime example of VB's weak research. Many thanks.​@@JfK--OBJECTivE

that is absolutely false more than a half dozen folks left after the shooting, more than 20 were absent for the supposed roll call before work ceased that day at the TSBD, the gun is not the only weapon that could have fired the shots and nobody saw oswald fire at the president . gee i wonder how you came to the conclusion without being aware of the facts?

You're right on the money.

absolutely wrong over a half dozen folks didnt return after the shooting and over 20 were missing that day. where you got that idea that oswald was the only one who left? thats not correct at all.

@@simonjames1604 Ok, but none of them owned the rifle that was also found on the sixth floor with Oswald’s prints on it….

@@jetcat132 and again oswalds "prints" were "found " on the weapon only after he died . no chain of evidence. and no way to trace that rifle to oswald, it wasnt ordered in his name, he was never seen picking it up or signing for it. so no chain of evidence there either you suck at this btw. you have no idea who did or did not own that gun.

Read the other Vince Vince Palamara's Honest Answers then get back to us if you were actually gullible enough to believe Bugliosi.

@@vernpascal1531 exactly

Don't bother. They won't read it. They'll poopoo all over it without ever laying an eye on one word in it.

@@vernpascal1531 really has nothing to do with being gullible. It's about weighing both sides.

If it wasn`t Oswald who killed Kennedy, then Kennedy wasn`t killed on 22 November 1963.

his work on ruby is pretty good, his work on oswald? he is selective about what he presents and what he omits. if your case is that good you can enter in some of the witnesses who contradict your position and you can include their statements that throw doubt on the case. for example wesley frazier claims the "curtain rods" package was not big enough to contain even a disasambled rifle. he was arrested and "pressured" into signing a confession which he refused to do and claims that if oswald did do it , it had to be a conspiracy as he needed he help to pull it off. again vince simply ignores testimony and eyewitnesses like this when they say things he doesnt like.

Wow. I genuinely pity you. You were duped. And you wasted a LOT of time reading a fraudulent book written on behalf of the Deep State by a known con artist. Tom O’Neill’s book “Chaos”, completely exposes Bugliosi, picks him apart, and sources in detail how he was completely compromised. If you read the book, you will come to see just how bad of a guy Bugliosi was.. he was downright evil, tbh, and a genuine piece of shit.

@@simonjames1604 why were the curtain rods never found?

@@bryanmack4054 according to marina oswald and wesley beulls mother and dougherty at the TSBD they never existed , oswald had his lunch according to the first two and nothing according to the third, so the majority of witnesses stated there was never any "curtain rods" to begin with. so you have to accept the testimony of the only other person charged in the murder of kennedy as the only one telling the truth. oswald told the police beull was mistaken and he never said a word about curtain rods and all he had was his lunch. if the rifle got in the building that day , nobody saw it going in .

@@simonjames1604from my understanding of most accounts, Oswald was a quiet loner who was always in the background and kinda forgettable. He may have unintentionally used that to his advantage to hide the gun as he walked in to the TSBD and hid away on the 6th floor that day

He was the perfect guy to use and was used. How many Communists in his orbit compared to US Intelligence Assets? About 2 dozen of the latter to Zero!

this assumes there was no car waiting , there is footage of a rambler leaving the scene right after the shooting. given some of the other folks the cia have used who were three times crazier than oswald , vince doesnt know what he was talking about as per usual. which is why its a bad idea to trust the writings of someone who was far more nuts than oswald writing on the subject. the DAs office would be "crazy" to use someone as unhinged as bugliosi but they did. some stuff just happens despite how stupid it seems once one knows all the facts.

@@simonjames1604 VB was far more nuts than Oswald? Please read VB's books, they are infinitely more sane than the myriad of conspiracy books I read.

@@MrWolfmantim that doesnt mean bugliosi isnt a nut ball cause he certainly was. you can easily find the paper trail of vinces various sins, he accused his milkman of having an affair with his wife and being the secret father of one of his children and harrassed the man for years breaking the law repeatedly in the process, including using his office to get information on the man and his whereabouts while lying to the police and the fbi why he needed the info. his wife stated she though vince had an undiagnosed mental issue and needed help. i mean theres more than just that story out there, but vince could never move forward in his career because these cases became public knoweldge in the 70s and he had to give up all his political ambitions. he had more than one screw loose.

@@simonjames1604 A nutcase who got Charles Manson convicted when Manson wasn't at either of the murders...yeah I'll take that "nutcase" any time. Sounds like YOU don't know what you're talking about and while you're at it why not post that footage of the Rambler leaving the Depository Bldg.

A loner? He was executed before the trial that was held in the court of public opinion, but he was a loner so that wraps it up for you?

@@AMC2283 not just a loner. There’s no real evidence after all these years . He lied about everything. So many things point to him.

@@Fernando-qk2hp I won’t waste your time tearing apart those things one by one. Just look at the big picture-jfk Oswald ruby Vietnam mlk rfk watergate. What does it really look like?

@@AMC2283 I understand that. Can look like a lot of things but In the end you need proof. Great to agree to disagree in this great country.

Stay well.

You can't see straight

Its good to be accurate he was headed for the 55.

Lmaooo he’s a complete lunatic what are you talking about 😭

@@pitnotthepalace4744Vince was right on and made complete sense and he smashed all the stupid conspiracy theories. What are YOU talking about. Name one thing he was wrong about

His entire ~1600 page tomb is based on the “argument from authority”… it is a truly impressive work, and after reading all the dizzying facts and testimonies, you’re left without a doubt, Oswald killed JFK.. until you begin to ask who the people were that he mentions who conduct these tests (he does in fact name them and their companies).. where do they get their funding? Did Bugliosi receive any funding? If so from whom? His entire life’s work is based off of reframing the proven incorrect conclusions the WC came to.. once your deconstruct his “science” on how there were 3 bullets, they matched Oswald, so on, literally the entire.. THE ENTIRE argument falls apart.. which it does. Bugliosi ignores evidence, period. Don’t make the same intellectually lazy mistake of lumping all “conspiracy theorists” together as crack pots.. because as it stands in 2023, the majority of the US population doesn’t believe LHO was a single shooter alone, and we simply have more evidence than the side you take.. real evidence to be specific. Love you girl sorry if that hurt.

Well in the more intelligent rooms it will serve as THE BOOK to read. What has happened over past couple yrs is the right has taken to it. The left was front and center of thusly particular case, not anymore

He was a liar in need of attention. His book is falsehood from cover to cover.

Vince was a psychopathic liar and cheater. He WAS a scumbag his entire life. Just happened to be a DA. Guy is the meridian Webster definition of a liar.

So what I’m saying is, Vince was a meaningless piece of shit, like you.

You’re an idiot

Considering the publication of “Chaos” by Tom O’Neill......your comment aged incredibly poorly my friend. You were badly duped by a charlatan

@@BillyBob-ec5ox he wasnt duped. He's a sellout doing his influencer 'job' by posting here.

Yes bug loves the strawman.

Bugliosi has 53 pieces of evidence linking Oswald to the murder. And Oswald was such a flake nobody would rely on him even to be at a given place and time to be a patsy.

You are so wrong. The Stretcher Bullet existence is proof there was a plan. How could it be perfect, no blood, and sitting on a stretcher with Connally? It was placed there as a Red Herring. Connally was buried with his bullet. July 17, 1993 I suppose you are trying to attract attention

vince ignored witness testimony he didnt like, so its easy to say no conspiracy when you are selective on who the witnesses are and what they say.

You should have saved your time and money and just read the Warren Commission Report...

Good on you, most people just ignore the facts and double down on the conspiracy.

This guy has no credibility

Come on, be honest, are you compensated somehow for posting things like that? Next you'll tell me his Helter Skelter theory was a logical, conclusive explanation of Manson's motive. If you're interested in a factual account, DANIEL P SHEEHAN taught a university level course on the JFK thing. It's still posted on KZfaq. Bugliosi is a conspiracy theorist; unscrupulous, even by lawyer standards and dangerously unstable according to his own wife. He's a court jester. The last person anyone should take serious. Knowing the source is vital when buying a narrative.

and what do you do with the Zapruder movie? and what do you do with CNN's audio of the police mike that proved by audio experts that there were at least 4 shots? really? you choose one source to believe and ignore the rest?

@Alastair Archibald: Why was Oswald allowed to flee the TSBD? Because at that point, he was merely an employee who worked there, someone not out of place, and not yet identified as a suspect in the assassination. Given two days of opportunity, that Oswald did not blab about "handlers" and "paymasters" or whatnot, is the strongest evidence that there was no such thing.

@@stddisclaimer8020 So, Johnson and Hoover are having lunch across the street from Johnson's house, (Arthur Robert Caro, "Master of the Senate") at his neighbor of 19 years and 30 years as "friends." (KZfaq, May 8th, 1964 Ceremony) Johnson is listening to Hoover rant and rave against the Kennedy's as usual and how he wished Johson had become President in 1960 instead of JFK. Johnson then responded with "Well I can if you didn't do such a good job protecting the President, I'd be President." Johnson made FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover Lifetime FBI Director shortly after JFK was killed in his polittical homestate, Texas. This action was legally questionable because Hoover was conducting an FBI investigation with Johnson's Commission called the Warren Commission into JFK's assassination and this action by Johnson could be interpreted as undue influence or conflict of interest, as if a pay off. The fact that it was not reported by the Warren Report that JFK was the 2nd Presidential assassination in a row after President McKinley, to be killed in a Vice President's homestate, his political home turf, shows biase in favor of Johnson. While Johnson was still President and Hoover was still the Director at 73, not having to retire by Johnson's decree, RFK was assassinated in the homestate of the next President, another Vice President, ex-Vice President and presidential rival, Richard Nixon, benifiting Nixon not having to debate another Kennedy on National TV again and benifiting Johnson and Hoover that they would not have to worry about being investigated for involvement in JFK's assassination by President Robert Kennedy. This method of operation or MO was similarly repeated again in the 2000 Florida voting controversy that caused a great amount of suspicion that the controversy was a homestate conspiracy by the opposing party because it happened in the homestate of the brother of the next President, the son of a Vice President that wanted to be President again thru his son, Bush41. To much to be a one time coincidence but a perponderance of evidence of homestate conspiracy. We may never really know who was totally behind this or involved but we will know the Kennedy's were killed in a conspiracy, a homestate conspiracy that could happen again if we let it. January 6th was a warning but Florida is waiting again.

But the lone gunman theory hinges on the theory that this lone nut wanted fame, infamy etc …yet he is denying committing any murder in the hall and bizarrely there are no notes of his interrogation. I have worked with cops - any big enough case they are going to play hero in front of media when a suspected perp is caught. No is suggesting Dallas PD was involved.

@@irisharan3038 Oswald wasn't looking to be caught. But he was trying to get in with a group called Fair Play for Cuba. Kennedy ordered the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. Oswald's wife, Marina, noticed that Oswald's rifle was missing on the day of the assassination, while a colleague giving Oswald a lift to work on a different day than usual asked Oswald what the wrapped bundle on his back seat was, and Oswald said, "curtain rods". Oswald's rifle was found in the "sniper's nest" in Oswald's place of work. It was an easy shot since the car was moving in a straight line away from the shooter. The Grassy Knoll would have been a lousy place to shoot from, and a shooter on the overpass would have been too conspicuous. And only one person ran from the Texas School Book Depository: Lee Harvey Oswald. He definitely shot dead Officer Tippet for asking him to identify himself. He ran into a theatre (UK sp) and when police apprehended him, he fought them and kept trying to draw his revolver, which is why an officer slugged him. There is no evidence that another or more shooters carried out the assassination, and Oswald is bang to rights, and he was in the optimal place to carry it out and he had the means and the training.

Cause he knew if he spoke there would be a worse fate waiting for him in jail.

@davidkemmer You've provided a tiresome litany of well-worn, long-discredited conspiracy-crap talking points, *_which post you've now cowardly deleted_* .. This illustrates why the plain truth of _Reclaiming History_ will always triumph over the "theories" you picked up from $1.99 pro-conspiracy books at a junk yard sale.

@@stddisclaimer8020 Reclaiming history has been totally discredited and relegated to the trash heap of history though one might still be able to find a copy or two in the fiction section of a remote library. Its about as worthless as your completely uninformed opinion.

Correct.

Which set of autopsy photos did the experts view? There were at least two sets.

@TermsofService someone who is so knowledgeable about law like Bugliosi and, evidently you, would know that at the very least, it was not a fair trial...not even close...motion to change venue was denied despite a surge in gun sales because people were scared....Manson wasn't even allowed to defend himself. It was a joke. And if you still have your head buried so deep in the sand to think that Oswald was a line gunman, they you are truly stupid beyond any hope.

@TermsofService Bugliosi prosecuted the case! Of course he isn't going to say it wasn't a fair trial! That case made him rich and famous. "Unwisely" bringing up JFK? Bugliosi is discussing it in this video! It sounds like you believe every lie that is spoonfed on TV.

@TermsofService actually....there is documented evidence that JFK's head was mutilated between the time he arrived at the hospital and his body was taken for autopsy. Scores of witnessed say they heard gun shots from the grassy knoll of but their testimony was never sought by the Warren Commission. Why not? If there is no conspiracy to cover up why not hear ALL the witnessed? Why was the Zapruder film confiscated and doctored before being shown to the public? What are they hiding? Stray bullets that would completely dispell the lone gunman theory? There are still more files to be declassified next year. Many are still reacted so we can't see all the names involved. Why is it a matter of national security at this point, over 60 years after the fact? FBI memo released where J. Edgar Hoover stated that the public MUST believe that Oswald acted alone. That's not suspicious or anything...and we know what an upstanding citizen of the world Hoover was. Evidence was deliberately left out. All the Warren Commission report provided was more questions than answers. When the story doesn't align with the evidence, then something is being covered up. If you actually trust the govt then I feel sorry for how naive you are.

@TermsofService Manson was denied his right to a fair trial. President Nixon declared him guilty, it was all over the newspapers. Manson held up a paper in court with the headline "MANSON GUILTY, NIXON DECLARES!" That should have been a mistrial. I'm not a crack pot conspiracy theorist...I'm just not gullible like you.

@TermsofService I could give two flying fucks what your dumbass laughs at.

he was a nutcase and very selective in what he chose to mention. not really the kind of person you could trust to cover the truth at all.

No, that is not why he shot him and you know it.

@@MrAmbassador11 lol

jay herzog , why didn't he take credit??? Plus nitrate tests came back negative, he denied it!

Oswald was a total liar. He thought he was smarter that everybody. He was going to test the system to the limit. Claimed police brutality when he was arrested. Bought the guns under phony name using a PO box. He was going to use every legal method to deny this and fight the system to the limit. You have to understand Oswald. The fact that he denied it is exactly in line with his character. He made so many flat out bullshit statements it's unbelievable.If you really study his life the Kennedy and Tippit shootings makes perfect sense.

jay herzog , how come All the files haven't been released? 54 years later! What Are they hiding?? Plus limo was washed and scrubbed that after noon contaminating the crime scene! Motorcycle cop 10-15 feet BEHIND the limo was hit with such force with JFKS brain matter that the cop thought he was shot indicating a shot from the front. Plus Oswald was located in the 2nd floor not 90 seconds after the final shot (he was also on the 2nd floor 15 minutes b4 the assasination. Drs at Parkland said that throat wound was a wound of entry! I can go on and on!

Why did some many people run towards the grassy knoll area? Another fact is that shots 2 and 3 were on top of each other! It was bang.....bang,bang according to many.

How about the many witnesses who died (many under mysterious circumstances)?

After Hunt's death, Howard St. John Hunt and David Hunt stated that their father had recorded several claims about himself and others being involved in a conspiracy to assassinate President John F. Kennedy.[3][65] Notes and audio recordings were made. In the April 5, 2007, issue of Rolling Stone, St. John Hunt detailed a number of individuals purported to be implicated by his father, including Lyndon B. Johnson, Cord Meyer, David Atlee Phillips, Frank Sturgis, David Morales, Antonio Veciana, William Harvey, and an assassin he termed "French gunman grassy knoll" who many presume was Lucien Sarti.[3][66] The two sons alleged that their father cut the information from his memoirs to avoid possible perjury charges.[65] According to Hunt's widow and other children, the two sons took advantage of Hunt's loss of lucidity by coaching and exploiting him for financial gain and furthermore falsified accounts of Hunt's supposed confession.[65] The Los Angeles Times said they examined the materials offered by the sons to support the story and found them to be "inconclusive".

Not credible

@@billmcleod6693 Sure they did after the fact constantly trying to cash in How many people confesses let's see Howard Hunt James Files etc etc etc.

@@billmcleod6693 Yeah, that's all been debunked. Rolling Stone Magazine is not a legitimate source for JFK researchers.

@@billmcleod6693 High Times once published an article claiming MLK Jr was killed in a CIA conspiracy. Guess what, Rolling Stone and High Times are no better than a tabloid.

not what the parkland doctors saw or testified too and these were trauma doctors who saw gunshot wounds routinely hundreds of times a year. some of them come across as quite hostile during their WR testimony

bartbengal explain please

He lied about the Manson case.

Komfy Koala he put an extremely dangerous, manipulative man behind bars. He could lie for the rest of his life and his sins should have been absolved.

@@coreilly796 Everyone implicated in the Manson case was guilty and deserved jail time, I won't argue agains that point. However his narrative focuses on sensationalizing the murders as opposed to supplying truth to readers.

bartbengal The Warren Commission got it right. The HSCA got it wrong. There was no fourth shot. Of the 178 witnesses in Dealey Plaza 81% heard three shots. The problem with both Committees is they thought the Zapruder Film recorded the assassination from beginning to end. Thanks to Max Holland and Johann Rush we now know the Zapruder film, does not depict an assassination about to commence. It shows one that had already started. Zapruder had started, then stopped filming 7 seconds in. When he restarted filming, the first shot had already been fired by LHO. So Oswald didn’t fire three shots in 6 seconds, he fired three shots in 11 seconds. A) The first shot was obstructed by traffic light pole and glanced off. (105 feet distance to JFK) B) Oak tree obscured and delayed second shot (briefly).This accounts for the overwhelming testimony by witnesses as to the shot pattern: One...pause...Two...Three. Also, it matches the distribution of the three cartridges on the 6th Floor. C) The second shot went through President Kennedy and Governor Connelly. (190 feet distance to JFK) D) The third shot was fatal. (275 feet distance to JFK) You can spend the rest of your life looking for ghosts, bogeyman, and shady characters. I got off that endless merry-go-round years ago. JFK conspiracy “die hards” will forever keep looking at irrelevant, insignificant, and proven falsehoods to keep their delusional conspiracy theories alive. You are cursed to keep looking and wandering the earth trying to find something that isn’t there. I understand the psychology behind your pursuit. But still, it’s sad. I know 100% LHO shot and killed JFK. He acted alone. I know 100% LHO shot and killed J.D. Tippit. He acted alone. I know 100% that Jack Ruby shot and killed LHO. He acted alone. CSI: Dallas 1963. Case closed.

Actually just the opposite

the lead da in dallas had told hoover on sunday that they didnt have enough to convict oswald , his case was completly circumstantial with several key "witnesses" turrning out to be fairly useless ( notably helen markham the lone witness to the tippet murder, and brennan whos "id" of oswald was deemed useless when he failed to pick oswald out of a police line up). nobody at the paine house could testify to oswald taking a rifle directly, the person who gave him a ride to work said the package was not a rifle, etc the case was a lot lot harder than you think . vince does a good job of selectively ignoring anything "difficult" in his book which is a diservice to the reader. if he was so sure of himself he should have been a lot more transparent than he was.

@@ryanwilliams6206 No, he’d have been buried by the evidence. I promise you.

@@simonjames1604 Haha that’s bullshit nice try.

@@jetcat132 no its not bullshit you troll. its correct. and as late as 69 lead investigator curry was telling the dallas morning news they didnt have enough to convict oswald, you are just a mental midget,. or a troll.,."buried by the evidence" what a tool you are .

I agree with Darby Crash concerning this whole episode

That’s just simply not true, lol. The “single shooter” claim, for example, has been completely debunked, scientifically and otherwise, on every notable scale. It simply didn’t happen that way. The shots came from different directions. The Zapruder film shows a FRONT shot to the head. A shot from the Depositary simply couldn’t have had that effect. By physics, it’s simply IMPOSSIBLE for there to have been only one shooter. The Magic bullet theory is a complete clown show. As for Bugliosi, he is a discredited hack, and was really a pretty sleazy guy. Chaos by Tom O’Neill methodically picks him apart. It exposes both his lies/errors, and his corrupt motivations

Tammy, there is far more evidence that JFK was killed by his Vice President Johnson in Johnson's political home, Texas, so he could become the next President than Oswald did in front of Oswalds work place.

vince was a mentally unstable person whos book is less than compelling , not sure you would want to align yourself with someone who due to his own misconduct was unable to ever seek higher office.

What makes you a 'Bugliosi' of sorts? Are you a former District Attorney? Did you write a best selling true crime book? Did you beat your mistress until she agreed to an abortion? Did you stalk a family over a bizarre inclination that the milkman got your wife pregnant?

@@FredPena-rd5cf kinda easy to see why vince couldnt get elected anywhere when the truth came out

@@simonjames1604 yeah and look at these sheep like BlueWolfe38, ' ...im a Bugliosi too..coooze...'. Smh. Who writes their scripted dialogue?

I just finished the book and it’s incredible. I’m kind of shocked that Bugliosi isn’t accusing his milkman of having something to do with the assassination.

@@freudianslip2534 O'Neill's book is a load of fabricated crap that can't be flushed soon enough.

Except his book has not evidence or definitive conclusions, just ad hominem attacks.

@@spearfisherman308 these stories about vince arent new they have been in print before and every time bugliosi tried to run for higher office these very real things he did would rear their head. so get your head out of the sand and do the research, i knew all about vinces past and i have never even read toms book . this stuff isnt a secret if you bother to research

@@simonjames1604 except they were made to s,ear him when he ran for office and they were settled out of court also the milkman story was because he thought that he was stealing from him not sleeping with his wife.

No, "Problems is" the Warren Commission never explained/ proved that there wasn't a conspiracy.

@@MrAmbassador11 which one?

@@timhorpo Niether; the Warren Commission never proved a case nor did they explain any possible motive. Oswald's "guilt" was decided prior to those shots in Dealy Plaza. J. Edgar Hoover calling from Washington DC telling the DPD had "their man" and that there were no "confederates" at a time when the DPD were still trying to sort out who they had arrested. How did Hoover know that, just after Oswald had been arrested? He solved the case from 1400 miles away?

@@MrAmbassador11 'never proved its case"? Rubbish. As well as, they never have to prove motive. No one needs to prove motive in a murder case. So Sherlock, did Oswald kill Tippett then?

Mr. Bugliosi didn't realize in his mindless defense of the indefensible...The Warren Report, that it ushered in the complete insanity of The Trump Presidency Phenomenon.

@@vernpascal1531 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - - - DEMOCRAT Obama and his officials at the Treasury Department and State Department were clear: They would work assiduously to freeze out Iran from getting dollars to fund its mischief and mayhem around the world. The Associated Press, puts it this way: "As the Treasury and State Department worked behind the scenes to help Iran access the dollar, the message to Congress remained the same: The JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) did not allow Iran to access the U.S. financial system." that's the conclusion of a report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It alleges Obama officials pushed the U.S. Treasury to let Iran convert the equivalent of $5.7 billion of funds held in Oman's Bank of Muscat from rials into dollars and subsequently into euros. It's important to note that the Iran nuclear deal also removed some $100 billion in sanctions on Iran. This made Iran once again a big player in the Mideast. It's almost certain that a good piece of that went to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards, which by some accounts control as much as 40% of Iran's economy. It's clear from Obama administration actions, under both his Secretaries of State, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, that the Obama White House despised Israel and did all they could to undermine its security. How else can you explain the enabling of a terrorist-supporting regime? The Obama administration failed to enforce its own "red line" in Syria on chemical weapons. By doing so, it in effect invited both Russia and Iran into that disintegrating country. Iranian troops today are within striking distance of our one true ally in the region, Israel.

how do you feel about him now?

@@andrewbrookes7025 not good

Okay...let's run with this...tell me what you believe is the most telling piece of evidence that points to Oswald being the only individual involved in this case..please...

More chance of a visit by the Tooth Fairy than Oswald alone, it's ridiculous, it's insulting and you have to dismiss tons of good witnesses, and make unbelievable excuse, after unbelievable excuse, to spout" like a good robot Oswald did it".

Global Jay is what we in the research community call a "lone nutter". JFK was supposedly hit from behind, but his body went backward, not forward. Ruby just happened to stop by the Dallas police station, just happened to have a gun in his pocket, just happened to get by police security and shot Oswald at the exact moment he was led out into the parking lot. Just "lucky", eh? Oswald was seen in New Orleans with members of Alpha 66, a group of vehement anti-Castro Cubans and connected to the CIA and the Bay of Pigs fiasco. "Coincidence"? The lone nutters are full of it. The Edgewood Arsenal tests prove CE 399 could not have hit both Kennedy ad Connally. Further confirmed by the testimonies of two autopsy technicians, Paul O'Connor and Jim Jenkins who witnessed the probe of Kennedy's back making indentations on the pleura. Many medical witnesses at both Dallas and Bethesda testified to damage in back of the head, absent in the autopsy photos. There's so much wrong with the official verdict, it screams for another investigation.

@TermsofService I've seen Vince many times speak of the points he tries to make in his book...I've seen him debate and he uses nothing but WC evidence to back his conclusions and the WC findings were decided before it began. Use only the evidence that could point to Oswald. Omit the witnesses and evidence that say otherwise. I know what's in his fairytale book...

@TermsofService You know, there's a great line in the film JFK where Kevin Costner as Garrison is speaking on the single bullet theory and says something along these lines... 'a physics professor can make the argument that you can tie an elephant's tail to a daisy and keep it from falling off a cliff'...or something similar. That's what Bug is good at...a good example is when he speaks of the change in the route and asks; The route was changed 4 days before the assassination. Could they really have planned all this using Oswald in 4 days?' Gullible folks let that slide right over them without pondering that question. But you and I know they planned it much earlier than that...don't we? Same with the mauser vs the carcano. The entire world was initially told the weapon was a mauser, but lo and behold...the 3 witnesses...well, only 2 actually changed their story even though they were all very familiar with rifles and identifying them. Gee, Walter Cronkite is reporting it so it must be true! Dozens upon dozens of these tidbits. And of-course the one witness that stuck to his guns committed suicide with a 22 rifle shot to his chest in his father's basement, even though he owned pistols...of-course. But he was a no-good cop...right TOS?

Well I'm not saying it's true but if i were paid to do so my argument would be this. A plot to kill the president would be an operation to be carried out with the utmost discretion, especially if it was an inside job. Where some people involved may not even now they're involved, a compartmentalization of tasks where some won't know what is the ultimate goal. Which as I'm given to understand is how some of the top operations go about where those that participate have only one job and one job only. Anyway, it could have been hidden into the plans for the Dallas motorcade almost invisible the space between vehicles, agents, and the placement of the president himself. The threat level could have been altered to lower defenses, and another shooter hidden somewhere not seen in one of the buildings around Houston and elm maybe using a type of ballistics that's more difficult to ascertain especially for civilian doctors. Sound can echo through a location like that to where an eye witness could be convinced they're mistaken that they heard two gunmen. Well that's my rough draft, again I don't buy into it.

Motive, means, opportunity. Oswald had only one of those for sure.

A mobster assasinated the 'killer' a day later

Oswald was the perfect patsy you tit

Foreign policy wise who benefitted the most? 1SR43L

Damn... I heard David Brent say that 10 minutes ago. Thats friggin weird.

Ridiculous. He spent 20 years doing research, writing in longhand, devoting his life to trying to convince people of something he believed to be false? Have some common sense.

@@IrishCarney There is not one shred of evidence Oswald killed JFK. A few witnesses saw someone who looked like him in the 6th floor window of the School Book depository. That proves what?! Other's in the building looked like him including Lovegood who actually had more indicating he was involved than Oswald. And they found a gun traceable to Oswald. Which is a bit too obvious to any real detective. It was clearly a setup. Where's the evidence he killed Tippet? None! Zero! Why was he in a theater owned by Howard Hughes a meeting place of spies? Why were micro dots found on Oswald? He was clearly involved in some type of spy agency. The media was telling us Oswald was a lone gun man two hours after the fact. You can't even interview all the witness and collect all the evidence in two hours! So there is no real evidence Oswald killed Kennedy. HOW IN HELL! can you prove he was a lone gunman???

@@petergrandahl2386 preach!!!! Preach preach!!! Love what you're saying

"Don't believe those who trying hard to convince you of their cause".

Because I've lived in the Soviet Uniion come on

Did you expect him to admit that he was guilty?

Patsy's fint have 53 piece if evidence against them.Lol I know you're being sarcastic.

@@randyharris3175 Tell those 53 piece of evidence idiot. You don't even know those 53 "evidence"

@@gytisgytis5547 Why aren't you being censored when you call me idiot.But let me say it that smack me with a quote do you really well I guess they go by your intellect they can tell yours by the content of your texts.I know all those 53 pieces of evidence for your info The people who believe Oswald didnt kill Kennedy is intellectually impaired or cashing in as a profiteer in my learned opinion which category do you fall in? The former I presume.

That is totally correct!...Ruby was known to act on impulse.....and so he did!

Well said, Jack! The "traffic light pole" theory is explored in the documentary "JFK The Lost Bullet" - highly recommended. It also includes state-of-the-art enhancements of several of the home movies taken during the assassination. The Hughes film in particular clearly shows a figure in the 6th. floor window of the "sniper's nest".

Nope...more like 8 seconds....more than enough time to fire those three shots.

Then You’d think he wouldn’t want to work out of guy bannister’s office in New Orleans.