Had Bugliosi lived just a bit longer, he would've loved, and latched onto, Kellyanne Conway's use of the term "alternative facts" to describe what these conspiracists use to promulgate their trash.

vincent bugliosi was a brilliant prosecutor!

No matter what your opinion is of this guy, he's was a one in a million in what he did.

A true genius and patriot! I read Reclaiming History twice and it's a masterpiece and anyone who reads it and still believes in a conspiracy should have their head examined.

Top man sadly missed, compelling argument against conspiracy theories

Clearly, for the JFK conspiracy theorists, their belief in conspiracy is quasi-religious and so is resistant to facts and evidence. But we see this phenomenon all the time with conspiracy theorists, whether they be Trumpian 'stolen election' diehards or what have you (a comparison which many 11-22-63 conspiracists would detest). Part of what inspires this religious devotion to a JFK comspiracy simply find it too hard to accept that he was not killed by powerful enemies as a martyr to liberal causes.

His book is the best. It's really several books in one, complete and compelling. I urge you all to read it and put the conspiracy theories in the trash where they belong.

Bugliosi, with his many legal and literary accomplishments and herculean work ethic, was an authentic force of nature -and here we see that he was a superb public speaker, as well. R.I.P.. Thanks for posting this, but it would be helpful to have included the Q-and-A session ...

Thanks for uploading. Never seen this. Love VB.

Vince was a legend. Great mind. Managed to explain complex issues such as the head snap to rear, the OJ prosecution mess and W Bush's lies. Miss Vince a lot

The bullet is designed not to fragment easily per the post WW1 nato convention. It's called a fully jacketed round. Obviously a head shot takes that out of play. Just explaining why the bullets don't deform as much as a non jacketed round would. Don't have time to give history lessons, educate yourself.

Read CHAOS by Mr. O'Neil for a lot of good information on Mr Bugliosi.

What’s the hot conspiracy theory today? What will be the new conspiracy theory tomorrow? What will be the new conspiracy theory next week?

Same with 9/11. No one read the commission report

Great video. Wish i could see the entire event, including audience questions. What i would REALLY like to see though, is an in-depth analysis of conspiracy theorists as a whole. The psychology of the deep-seated beliefs, the anger, the straw-manning, the insults of people that disagree with them. There's a lot of confirmation bias of course, but there's also a lot of interesting psychology there, and i would love to see more research on what makes people shut down their critical thinking to pick a side, and defend it at all costs.

I'd still like to know how Oswald having 13 dollars in his pocket and hailing buses and cabs proves the "lone gunman" theory.

I like to think I can be somebody who tries quite hard to keep an open mind about what happened, that any of the Oswald lone gunman, Oswald in a conspiracy or Oswald uninvolved patsy theories could be true. However just a few minutes listening to Bugliosi and I cannot help myself strongly believing that the truth was that five or ten conspiracy theories happened at the same time. Vince was a very nice man, may he rest in peace. I had known him a little bit quite a long time ago. But when he opens his mouth to talk about the JFK assassination I've usually been appalled he doesn't realise how much harm he does to his own, cherished Oswald lone gunman theory. I think there are a few JFK experts like this, experts who back the Oswald lone gunman theory and who are probably responsible for a great deal of ordinary people taking an interest in the Kennedy assassination and early on being drawn by the strange feeling the lone gunman theory cannot be the answer! Sometimes I wonder was Vince aware this was the effect he was having on many people and even if it were intentional. (There can genuinely be reasons for such a strange phenomenon.) Late 2023 and we finally have the answer on the so-called "Magic Bullet" from Secret Serviceman Paul Landis, which shows us that the Warren Commission story was even many times more ridiculous as detractors have said for over half a century, and further proves there was more than one gunman. The perfect, barely touched bullet had apparently lodged very slightly into Kennedy's back then fallen out again, or simply hit without penetration and fell down, lying in a crease at the back of the seat. This is where Landis found it, picked it up and in the commotion not knowing what to do with it, laid it on Governor Conally's stretcher in the hospital. It was always clear such a bullet could never have gone through anything or anyone let alone a full human body and then parts of another body twice, including bone. Since the time of the Warren Commission experts have lined up to demonstrate "incontrovertible proof" (which we are told is even obvious, speaking for itself) of how such a perfect, untouched bullet absolutely was commensurate with their unbelievably absurd "Magic Bullet" yarn. Perhaps the whole idea was the very absurdity - a kind of cognitive dissonance designed blatantly to shut people up, have them murmur like broken robots, "doesn't compute... malfunction... can this be real... can't hold it in my head... can only think of dinner with apple pie for desert... forgetting... forgetting. .. nevermind... apple pie". Briefly, in a nutshell, now we know there was no single "Magic Bullet" which went through more than one person in the car. The MB yarn was invented to show fewer bullets were fired than we know now actually were fired, in order to make it possible for the Mannlicher Corcano rifle to be the only gun and account for the time taken to fire the shots seen within the Zapruder film. What's clear now (always was to a vast amount of people, probably the majority of people for some decades at least) that there is no chance Oswald or anyone else who may have had the (or a) MC rifle could have fired the number of shots shown in the Zapruder film, reloading the bolt action manually and refiring, in even the maximum calculated time preserved on film. The Magic Bullet theory is proven nonsense. (Whilst for a vast amount of people, if we believe many polls easily a sizable majority, it didn't have to be proven as it was clearer than day). Simultaneously the lone gunman theory is proven false. This doesn't prove that Oswald wasn't a part of shooting the president but it definitely, finally, easily proves that whether or not he was a gunman, Oswald could not have been the only gunman firing. The whole basis of the case against Oswald has gone - the "lone nut" theory. The whole motive and reasoning of the official conclusion on the Kennedy assassination is now gone forever. Well, as the sixtieth commemoration of President John F Kennedy's death approaches in November, you have to wonder what will be said to further the lone nut gunman legend further, what new move will be made to attack Landis' evidence which forever has exposed in terms of actual real world proof, of fact, the whole Warren Commission delinquency. What prize, select morsels of disgusting, rotten tripe will we be served up in order to keep the absurd, sixty year old, always obvious lies going strong? Again, Rest in Peace Vince. You had to do what you had to do. This place often enough is not to be understood. I feel lucky to have met you.

He did make one mistake in his book though probably wasnt his fault does anybody know what the mistake is.?

Mr marco8555 everything you said you can not prove and to me that makes your statements absolute bullshit this man hit the nail on the head

~ Good book ...

Bugliosi is intelligent and charming. During this "excerpt" of his speech, at least, he focuses on the Warren Commission and Oswald. He does not seem at all interested in whether there may have been multiple, barely related shooters. Nov. 22 is not about the one assassin that was apprehended in the Texas Theatre - it's about the all too common miscarriages of justice that occur in our judicial systems, where a perpitrator must be found, and where investigative incompetence and laziness (call it "convenience") lead to cover-ups. In this case, there is also a clear desire for secrecy and non-disclosure, as evinced and admitted to by the CIA's 2013 report on John McCone's withholding of information (particularly about CIA-Mafia co-operation in regards to overseas assassination plots). Don't keep looking at Oswald. Look at Dealey Plaza, and it looms as "the place" many days before 12:30 p.m. on Nov. 22. Incidentally, that exact time is critical for many expected future indictments, wars, promotions, reckonings and an election. The time, the place, the opportunity - and the motive(s). For my liking, Bugliosi talks too much like a lawyer with a client (the Warren Commission) to defend.

A simple "disproof" of Bugliosi's assertion than his book "clarifies" all questions around the assassination. Please tell us, what was the exact position of the three spent cartridge cases on the sixth floor, before anyone entered the scene? You cannot answer this, Mr. Bugliosi. And there must be many more relevant questions about the assassination you cannot answer.

It really is quite amusing, that to this day & on this comments section, there are still people despite all the factual evidence, keep insisting it was all a conspiracy. Too funny indeed, they are 🎈🎈🎈😅

top man

He tries to analyze Oswald and he simply cannot do it because one, he is a lawyer, not a doctor, and two, almost no one knew him. But what he gets fundamentally wrong is that Oswald was working with Naval Intelligence. If he was truly defecting why was he allowed back in the States? With his Russian wife? ( who was related to a Russian Intelligence officer) why were his first two contacts in New Orleans CIA operatives? One of which described Oswald as a Best Friend! One of which was a Quaker Teacher who spoke fluent Russian and keep the wife in her house along with Oswald's rifle. This was an obvious Cover-up Conspiracy. All of the evidence shows that. A Trial? Without Oswald to defend himself? Convenient. Obvious to everyone but Bugliosi.

What about all the witness murdered?

I wonder if Bugliosi's "RH" hews to the fetid WC method of ignoring the people absolutely closest to the killing scene while devoting reams of pages to Ruby's cleaning lady and the Carousel Club's handyman. Pfft.

BS= Book Sucks

Fiction Writer...

I'll condense this for you..Oswald shot Kennedy because I say so.

cant trust him.