Congress has been bought and paid for.

Indeed. Performing a tour of duty for this great nation should be a prerequisite of eligibility to run for office.

He's explaining things to politicians, not representatives. Think about printing money. The gov prints money to take a small amount of value from everyone's dollar right into their own pocket. Printing money is theft. We live in times of taxation without representation, with a very questionable government attempting to disarm us in every way.

Not for much longer - Republicans will take control in November and clean up the mess

Exactly. My dad has a .223 'ranch rifle'. Its ballistics are identical to any AR out there. He is correct it's all about looks

The word "uninfringed" is on purpose so Americans have the same weaponery to fight the tyranical government!

How many school shooting with cops sitting around outside, and they DARE say you don't need a gun, popo will protect you.

Because they are also ordinary irrelevant civilians with no public influence... oh wait...

But how long will they really be protected after pissing off the Secret Service ❓😀😀😀😀😀

@@richhauxwell7848 you mean secret service like Kennedy had?

In the context of semi-auto rifles like the AR15, he needs to stop the language like, "As fast as you depress the trigger is as fast as a round comes out." (3:49) That sounds frightening to people who are against guns (but are not against releasing criminals who have wounded or killed victims with guns).

@@geoh7777 yeah thats another issue, everyone today are pussy snowflakes that cant think and handle the truth. this society is collapsing.

​@@geoh7777I think you're missing the statement. He is still on the topic of semi auto classifications and their umbrella of bans, anyone in that room should know as such of what he's talking about. "as fast as you can depress" clearly not meaning "as fast as you can _hold_ down the trigger"

@@yeejay6396 yeah still that not the bigger picture, small minded as they all are in this hearing, because its legislative thinking. they just broad up a wrong fact for this ban. the real question and or statement would be for example. 2 shooters nearly the same skill in a competion 1 has an ar platform gun the other has a handgun. who would win? the ar would in most situations. accuracy firepower magazin cap. modding capability. the ar is a better gun in nearly everything except concealment but u wont conceal such a beauty. that why they wanna ban it because it better and therefore more deadly which infact is true considering the mass shootings.

It makes no difference

Brotha….that is f*cking poetic! 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾 I’m using that exact quote every chance I get! 💯

@@davidcoleman1861 - You're welcome. 😃

That's where he was trying to go but clearly these kinds of people get emotional and ASSUME they know where he is going

Why would you want someone with an apparent lack of intelligence (what you meant was experience or knowledge btw), to ask a question about intelligence? First off experience is not the same as knowledge. You can have knowledge without experience. You can also have experience without knowledge, something Greg clearly demonstrated. You can have experience and knowledge without intelligence. What Greg explained is the difference between the types of firearms as categorized by their function of fire and load. Getting confused by simple facts like why loading times, magazine clip sizes and such matter for the amount you can kill within a given time frame. So even though he has experience. He clearly lacks knowledge and intelligence. Not helped by the fact that he presented it all as a toddler would, showing pictures of guns and getting extremely specific as if that matters. I get it guns are cool! They make you feel powerful and safe. Feeling powerful and safe is not the same as being powerful and safe.

@@Nemesis-pe7mw - "You can have experience and knowledge without intelligence." If you don't have the intelligence to comprehend the what you experience, or the knowledge presented, you can't get anywhere. Your statement that you can have experience and knowledge without intelligence is absurd. There is no such thing as a "magazine clip." They are two different components. Two examples of clips are "stripper clips," such as those used to load an SKS rifle, which is a narrow, shaped piece of steel on which the back end of a cartridge is retained in place. 10 of them to be exact in this case. Then there is the En-Bloc clip used to load an M1 Garand, which is another stamped steel shaped clip which holds 8 rounds, and the clip and rounds are all placed into the receiver of the rifle together. These are just two styles of "clips." A "magazine" is typically a rectangular box shaped enclosure (whether steel or plastic) that can hold 6 to 30 rounds, typically, depending on the firearm (pistol/rifle) and caliber. These are the devices you typically see being loaded into the grip of a semi-automatic handgun, or a larger magazine loaded into a rifle like an AR-15. There are also a myriad of rifles that utilize a much smaller magazine than that of the AR-15, which are typically hunting rifles. No, while guns are fun to learn to shoot accurately, and the engineering of how they function is impressive, especially the varied ways the firearm's execution of their performance is accomplished, those who carry firearms for protection every day are merely looking to stay alive if they are the victim of an armed criminal. You may have noticed that no unarmed victim of an armed criminal, who survived, has said "Thank god I was defenseless." A lot of people carry a pocket knife because of how handy they are to open a cardboard box, cut a zip tie, cut some string or a chord, or a myriad of other things that occasionally come their way. Others carry pens because you never know when you will need to jot something down, sign something, or maybe do some math. More people also carry a small flashlight/penlight of some kind, but many people also just rely on the light on their phone if light is needed in the dark, or to look behind something close to a wall, or find something that rolled under something on the floor. People carry these things to be prepared "just in case." It's better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it. This is why most people who carry a handgun daily do so. It is no different than having their phone, their wallet, or that flashlight on them. The media, and politicians, however, like to portray this differently. Speaking with more people who carry daily will provide a more accurate picture of the mindset of these people. If you have been away from your house and out in public, such as a parking lot, a retail store, a bowling alley, a grocery store, a restaurant, or most any other place, you have been around and among people who were concealed carrying, and you never knew it. And nothing happened. This is life every day for everyone. If there are two convenient stores that a criminal is looking to rob, and the one on the left side of the street has a sign that says firearms are not allowed, and the one on the right side of the street does not have such a sign.....which one do you believe the criminal will feel safest in? The one where he knows all the law abiding customers will be defenseless, or the one where he doesn't know if someone, or multiple customers, may be armed? Which one would YOU rob if you were a criminal? You said people can have experience and knowledge without the intelligence required to comprehend both. You don't know the difference between a magazine and a clip. You also seem believe everyone carrying a handgun for protection feels powerful and safe. None of these things demonstrate knowledge, or the intelligence to comprehend them, on your part. I have found I have got further in life knowing when I don't know something than the things I do know. When a person doesn't know something, and acts on that thing anyway, they usually end up going backwards. I don't feel safe or powerful because I carry a handgun (with a State permit by the way, in effect making me a "certified good person" due to the more extensive background check). I feel "mostly prepared" to deal with being confronted by an armed criminal wishing me, or my family, harm. If it were to happen I will be nervous and scared (who wouldn't?), but with the training I've had, and the extensive amount of practice I've had, I feel I have a much better chance of surviving such an incident than a person who is not armed. Being able to shoot back is better than only being able to catch bullets with my body. I also carry pepper spray in case that is the level of force required to deter someone, or multiple people, who wishes me harm. I also have 4 years of martial arts training, which I enjoyed and was fascinated by very much. If hand to hand combat is what is needed for me to escape I am prepared that way as well. And of course, I can run, if that is available to me. No, I am not "hoping" nor looking forward to defending myself against an armed criminal or criminals. I hope it NEVER happens, as the vast majority of concealed carriers hope (there's always exceptions to everything). However, we can't control what other people are going to do, so like having a flashlight, a pen, or a pocket knife, it seems it is a good idea to be prepared if such an occasion were to arise. In the meantime, it is fun to challenge myself to become very accurate with my carry guns, as well as enjoying the novelty of shooting historic military rifles, one of which is 124 years old. Shooting something so old, and with the engineering of that age, is very amusing and enjoyable. It is not something I would use for defense though.

*You beat me to the punch. Great comment!*

Amen 🙏.

"That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants." ~ Jeff Cooper

👏 Exactly 💯

@@goosecouple they are the criminals

They should have to lead by example

guns make it easier for bad guys to kill

@@ProtectChildrenNotGuns and bad guys do not obey gun laws. What is your point?

Can confirm they do want the guns we carry banned.

@@rupertpicante2079 if that is your reason for not doing anything about the gun violence then I am afraid that it is going to get worse for our kids. America is going to look more like a war zone

I thought the same thing. What an idiot.

Who was that?

So... She was there in combat with her constituents??🤣🤣🤣

Sounds like Sheila Jackson.... You know the last who says all ARs are Daniel Defense DDM4.... Or that they weigh as much as 15 heavy moving boxes.

@@EvLSpectre i heard her say that...strange.

it means that civillians didnt have access to weapons and ammo to kill 10s or 100s in a very small amount of time To those saying they had automatic weapons in the revolutionary war. I’m aware, but the fact you’re drawing an equivalency that an AR-15 which is widely accessible, much lighter, can carry vastly more ammo in a smaller space and can be used much easier is the same as the fucking pickle gun is laughable. You heard “automatic” and immediately jumped too “erm actually they had those during the revolution 🤡” Try doing columbine with the fucking pickle gun.

​@@DamfinsaowefinaweBut our military does, which is exactly why the 2nd amendment was written up in the first place. To prevent tyranny.

@@declanblaisure1449 look at all the tyrants our 2nd amendment is removing. All those middle and high schoolers, thousands of future tyrants removed by our amazing 2nd amendment.

​@@Damfinsaowefinawethe puckle gun: am I a joke to you You: yes

@@Damfinsaowefinaweyes they did. Automatic weapons existed before the Constitution was written.

Of course, none of them did, they hate men, can't even define what a fucking women is, and hate guns. Bet if they were required to serve, after a fair number of them had their feelbads hurt and suck started a shotgun, congress would do more for veteran suicides, because then they would have something to gain from it.

McCain was a closeted Democrat.

Senator Tulsi Gabbard (sp?).

@@nospam3409 yeah, but she’s center left. The rest of the Democrats actually hate her.

@@jordanhendrix2619 Agreed. Just saying she's a war veteran and a Democrat.

Democrats know the difference. They're gun owners too (they're hypocrites, remember). What you're hearing is what their lobbyists are paying them to lie about.

It is highly likely that most of them know. They are arrogant and contemptuous enough however, to believe they can con their constituents, most of whom were stupid enough to vote for them in the first place.

He had to put it at a 4th Grade level for all in Congress to understand. Semper Fi.

That's because they want to take your RIGHTS, to CONTROL you, it's that simple and ANYBODY, with half, of a functioning brain, knows it, which says a lot, about Demoncraps, I mean Democrats.🤔🤷

@@martyshannon7542 🦅🌎⚓️

they don't know the basics of anything. these are the teacher pets. they are there to work for the top rich elites. they are puppies with cobra venum. it's funny to see that even the west has the same stupid shit we have here lol.

And most of them should not vote on the reproductive rights for women, when they most likely don't know basic biology, but that hasn't stopped them yet...

Amen

I want an m4

​@@devin3607 I like the older m16s before they switched to 3 round burst. Pretty sure all m4s are burst fire.

@@LisaAnn777 i can confirm M4A1 and M4A2 rifles are safe, semi, 3rnd.

@@morvek that's what I was saying, Id prefer a older m16 with full auto instead of 3 round burst like in the m4s. I know legally 3rd burst is considered "automatic" in the US, but I'd want a true fully auto if I could afford it lol

Sadly most of the time it falls on deaf ears. The democrats attack on guns has nothing to do with functionality, mass shootings or any other reason. It is soley because they dont want people standing up aginst their tyranny.

SO YOU ARE TELLING US THE FOUNDING FATHERS WANTED THE SECOND AMENDMENT SO IF THE FOUNDING FATHERS BECAME TYRANTS YOU COULD SHOOT THEM???? RUN THAT BY US AGAIN REPUBLICANS???? WELL, I'D LIKE TO HEAR REPUBLICANS SAY WHICH OF THEM AGREES OUR GUNS ARE MEANT AS A DETERENT TO "THEM". GO AHEAD, SAY IT

*Molon labe!*

As always , they will retain their selective hearing loss and this will fall on deaf minds

Waste of time. None of them were listening, and the only place anyone else will see it is here of on Cspan

Indeed. They KNOW they are nothing but leeches, sucking the lifeblood from our country and doing nothing for it. Most Dem politicians and many 'publicans see our military as nothing but canon fodder to be used to advance their own greedy causes. May they be Judged accordingly.

Yeah I thought it was funny and sad at the same time. Spineless through and through.

Of course "Shenequa" had to get her two cents in.

And notice NOT ONE of them had been in combat...

Emotional grandstanding. It's there favorite tool.

Taught in schools

@@devin3607 should be or is?

@@Chapaveli5959 should be* i wish it was taught in schools

@@devin3607 guns and schools do not mix. But it should be explained by all the media platforms, and news stations. And if parents who own or want to own, want to truly learn about the guns here in the US, let them be the ones to teach their kids. Not the schools.

@@Chapaveli5959 parents should definitely teach their kids too

Worse, the next lady to speak immediately moved to strike at least part of his commentary.

bro he compared a lever action rifle to a semiautomatic rifle... they're not the same

@@resin420 he didn’t say they were the same though. Just mentioned how they function differently same with the pump action. But majority of the left don’t know the difference other than looks, which seems to be par for the course with about everything with the left.

@Joseph Avenetti and still said they were pretty much equal.. which definitely isn't true unless you're really proficient with a lever action.

@@resin420 they are equal both shot single shot squeeze shoot but with civilian lever action faster then with semi automatic

I think it’s even scarier that, the fact that those politicians are most likely going to ignore this person’s information and still think the AR15 is a fully automatic mass murder machine

The politicians know damn well how these firearms work. They know damn well that their objections are almost entirely cosmetic. But their VOTERS hate guns. They do not how what the reasons are that they get guns banned, they just want to get them banned. All of them. It won't stop with AR's, or Glocks, or whatever. They will ALWAYS find a new reason.

you assume they know anything about anything else. They are a face. The face of Martha's Vineyard. They hire the help to figure it out.

Same here, Chief.

They know exactly what they’re doing and they don’t care, because they’re being paid for exactly that - gaslight and act stupid, so they can dumb down everyone else.

Yep

It may be impossible but I am not a fan of the other option.

@@deadtoadsoup facts are facts.... plain and simple.... wordplay doesn't change that

@@deadtoadsoup name one thing this man said that was incitement? I'll wait. 🤡

@@deadtoadsoup if you're referring to J6, then your argument is weak. How about Beetlejuice inciting people to go after Supreme Judges? How about the BLM RIOTS of 2020? Again... I'll wait

Well regulated is the part you conveniently ignore. It’s important

@@unclebrian1373 That refers to Militia. You are over looking the second part "the right of the people" not the Militia.

Enjoy the red wave Dems. once red takes house back its going to be so sweet to see you Dems. squirm. Biden/Harris are the worst presidents ever even next to Putin. FJB

@@unclebrian1373 Nice try but no cigar. To repeat...SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

@@unclebrian1373 You ignored the comma.

They won't let you do it or have it.... Unless you give them enough money...

I'm going out to buy a gun right now, and it only shoots one shot at a time. It's called a tank.

It was one of Hitler’s 1st moves.

@Jasper Kensington 👍🏼 Historical consequences of Gun Control Laws for the Unarmed citizens 1911 Turkey - 1.5M Armenian Christians Murdered 1926 USSR - 20M Murdered 1932 Guatemala 200k Murdered 1938 Cambodia 2M Murdered 1938 Germany - 19M Murdered 1945 China - 80M Murdered 1955 Uganda 300k Murdered 1979 Rwanda 800k Murdered 2022 United States ??? “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Sir Winston Churchill

thats why their doing it.

just like Australia

Orah

I use to work for a place that had a jeff cooper review quote on their wall. which I thought was wild cause they had hella endorsements. but cooper was the one permanently on the wall.

A great quote by a pawn who fought for the rich

@@kronk9418 still a great quote

According to the CDC, between 2 and 5 _million_ crimes per year are averted by defensive use of a firearm.

Do you think he lays naked with his gun collection late at night when he is all alone and lonely? I do. He has man issues.

Except even he described an M16 selector options incorrectly, He said the three selector options for an M16 are: "fully automatic, three round burst and semi-automatic"... Wrong... The three options are three round burst, semi-automatic and safe. "Automatic" has not been an option since the Vietnam M16 A1 version.

M16 has a safe, semi-auto and 3 rd burst, m4, to which he refers, has full auto, 3 rd burst, and semi auto.

@@dsantos72 The M-16A2, 20' inch-barreled, fixed-stock version which I was issued after joining the US Army in late 1987, had "SAFE", "SEMI", and "BURST" marked above the three-position selector switch.

@@Remy4489 lol actually he said M4....

I like that someone was offended that he would suggest that none of them had served. And none of them had!

Jamie Lannister vibes... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j9yIhsh4zs_JoXU.html

@@jsatko I have concluded they get offended by the truth.

*Try to teach brain dead warm body shills*

That little man would get eatin up in a combat zone lmao

bro.. gun not bad, person behind the gun is

Well, now the majority will increase the extent of their desired ban...very informative for them.

The only argument that needs to be made is referring to the constitution and the part where it says. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!

@@devastor-phil310 exactly

@@devastor-phil310 the democrats and republicans are two sides of the same coin.

@@justineslick6463 And the only other argument that needs to be made is WELL REGULATED MILITIA.

Lol 😂 yeah but did you serve?? Well no I didn’t but my grandfather did. Yeah asswipe I’m not asking about your grandfather I’m asking if you did?? 🤦‍♂️ my favorite in a debate with a liberal over one time when she tells me you don’t need an assault weapon and I asked do you even know what an assault weapon is? And she replies well no I don’t it doesn’t give you a right to insult my intelligence. Well you did that to yourself and you just lost the debate before I even started. You tell us what we can’t have but yet can’t describe anything about it. Like these democrats who don’t know Jack shit but tell you that you can’t have one.

Yes. I had an argument on Twitter with a woman who was totally ignorant about economics, but she claimed to be an expert because her late husband had been an economist for over 25 years.

@@garymanis6305 It's the most rampant behavior pattern I've observed since social media technology has become mainstream.. the whole "teenage mentality" syndrome. They learn a little bit about something and somehow think they are an expert.. about everything!

"My dad works at Microsoft!" - Halo 3 Team Slayer circa. 2007

Dem politicians are weak and pathetic Americans and most of them would never serve in the military. They think that's beneath them since they are elites.

Sure politicians don't need to be rocket scientists.... but at least research and learn a bit when you are making laws

@@behcherry9815 agree, it does not take much to get a basic working understanding of most subjects up for political debate. The fact they appear to have had zero interest in doing so yet already dead set on legislating it is disgraceful to say the least.

They know. It’s just political posturing to say “we did something.”

Is a weapon of war really defined by its ability to have its rate of fire changed though?

@@VeggiesOutFront anything can be a weapon of war and fucking rock can be a weapon of war

they know, but they are just making shit up at this point.

@@InAnOut- it literally was people use to have boys in their village practice sling from their young age so they can be use in hunting and later in war much like archery

I'm not on either side politically but in recent years have started leaning right because of outbursts like the gentleman had. He didn't wait for context before jumping to a conclusion and with that mentality he should not have anything to do with what bills get passed or don't.

@@l.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.l the thing is that its become a case of anything senseless belongs to the left. its hard to stay in the middle when you have people saying things like ban the police. they are also very intolerant ironically enough so they are very quick to shun anyone that differs in opinion. more and more people will go to the right just because they are alienated from the left. it used to be whats the better way to get to the same goal now the goals have shifted. the right has kinda stayed to the same goal and possibly shifted a little but the left has completely changed what we all were aiming for. its no longer about how to improve the lives of everyone in the country. instead its about who needs to suffer and who is oppressed. its a witch hunt for some kind of retribution that only consumes and never gives anything worthwhile to the people.

People do this to me a lot. I like to let them carry on till they take a breath then i calmly tell them thats not what i said and continue to embarrass them by showing facts.

@@Ojthemighty they make it easy. Alm you have to do to make a leftist look ridiculous, is be familiar with reality

@@SomeUnkindledAsh exactly lol.

Gov't geezers.

Word!

no he didn't. he made the point that most weapons should be banned. he did a good service for the gun control issue.

Im Going to mark this and all that check marked as stupidity of people who think they’ve accomplished more then someone they know nothing about there’s a lot of dumb people in this world and this is proof.

@@jacobthorns5776 how did he make that point?

Seems legit.

Another Democrat who belongs in long term care home

Well, there IS the Beowulf.

@@jojodancer1743 Nobody uses that round hardly though, I'd rather build a 458 socom than a 50 Beo. even then I'd rather build a 6.5 Grendel.

@@spiritovrlnd Nobody asked you what YOU would rather build you putz. I was responding to the original comment. Go drum up a debate somewhere else.

They know what they’re doing. They are commies and want to kill us. Period! They need our guns

Exactly why I think every person responsible for making laws needs at the very least a basic course in every single issue up for debate. Especially firearms, before they make laws about things they know nothing about

Even worse, once he was done, a lady from TEXAS moves to strike his words.

Weapons of war also includes spears, arrows, swords, knives, sticks, rocks, ropes and water. Convicted felons don't follow gun laws.

The worst part is he compared a Glock with a weapon that has an effective range of around 300 yards. Wild.

He was butthurt over nothing, big guilt complex since he knows what their trying to do is stop Americans from defending themselves against criminals. I thought his outburst was hilarious since I had a pretty good idea where the other gentleman was going with his argument.

But my father ! lol..

Both the “father’s son” and the unidentified female…. Were anticipating the question being raised they way they raise these questions, on grounds of emotion and empathy….. it never occurred to them that he was asking if they were truly technically qualified and informed to use the “weapons of war “ rhetorics.

We have not become Fragile the left has.

How about the other moron democrats "I have seem soldiers die in battle" WHERE ? unarmed sitting duck at ft hood?

That's dope

😂😂😂😂😂

Yep, we are being conned by criminal democrats.

You tiped zime instead of time so your fully understandable and funny comment lost all of it's value

@@Jugoslavija ok

Seriously! I told my aunt I have an ar15 and she scoffed asking, YOU HAVE AN AUTOMATIC ASSAULT RIFLE!? 🤦‍♂️I said nope neither, it’s an AR15 lol Tried to educate her but I could see my words go through one ear and out the other.

@@DaseggMQB I hear ya, I’ve ran into MANY ppl like that. It’s always “it’s my way or no way” with them. There is NO REAL bipartisan anymore, it seems that whenever anyone other than the democrats try putting ANYTHING forward to get passed the other parties have to GIVE IN on so many other things just to get the democrats to budge. That’s not bipartisan, it’s CONTROL…… and that’s unfortunately the future of our nation unless something changes AND I MEAN FAST!!!

@@DaseggMQB Libs are not interested in truth. They know what they know and if you don't agree you're racist. Facts have no place in the democrat brain.

..... What do you mean functional? Fully auto matic? That's fucking stupid and all the moron civilians that want fully automatic are dumb. The reason the US Army removed the fully automatic function from the AR-15 and M16 style platform is because people where just blowing a whole 30 round magazine at nothing and then running out of ammo in a long, drawn out combat situation. The current military uses 3 selections: 3 round burst, single shot and then saftey. Source: Infantry combat veteran, deployed to Baghdad in 05. Carried the Squad Automatic Weapon for 6 months and then had a modified M16 with a longer barrel that was free floating and 2 stage trigger with match grade ammo then switched over to a normal M16 for the rest of the deployment

Agreed.

Spoiled-rotten brat in a grown man's body. So used to always getting his precious little way he throws a tantrum the moment he doesn't.

The burn when the guy said "he may or maybe not have served" I cracked up, passive aggressive blow.

but, but, but my father was registered for the draft, and my cousin was in the coast guard for 2 years during the gulf war...😂

He's literally the dude from the diner in good will hunting.

@@Mr.Average1957 So when you are asked if you served, do you answer with "my father did?" That was the whole point: a straight and clear question.

or they will say something like "but men can still get pregnant"

Makes sense now, Dems rely on 1.) stupid voters 2.) Lazy voters and 3.) emotion!

Ahhh........!? Pretty sure......most of those weapons have been used in mass shootings,....lol

Because they do not want you to explain how something works, they just want you to tell them how they are supposed to FEEL. That's why I love to see protestors asked question, they get that "someone tell me what my opinion was, again, please!" look on their face.

Correct. Ha!

Some people actually need them to defend their families, between the ghetto and the rockies. Threats come in all sizes. It’s clearly to disarm the people for communist takeover.

Its always the people who don't know anything about guns/never shot them that are against them the most, it's because people fear what they don't know

While coincidently also afforded private security that we all don't have the luxury of having. Go figure...

Exactly

The only people that think their rights are being infringed have never actually read the constitution.

The dems still won’t understand

@@jt3366 We were able to, up until 1986.

@@MajorisMons you still can but the price went threw the roof

Perhaps next time he can he can draw it out with Crayolas and stickers maybe the Democrats will be able to understand it then

@@jesseabreu3849 they don't care all Democrats care about is taking all are guns so they power over us

Representative but yes

I know right I was so shocked like I was sure he was about to send out bullshit when he ask if any one served

@@1roxyfan491 A representative is a politician, he engages in politics.

@@arcticchod5370 not a career politician though

Logic and reasoning. That's why the others didn't understand.

He is implying that the AR-15 has the exact same functionality as a glock, because it is semi-automatic. Its like saying a barette 50. cal is the exact same functionality as a .22 plinker because its bolt-action.

​@@jacobp8294 No he is commenting on the functionality of the trigger mechanism inside the firearms. He mentioned that the gentleman before him went over what you're referring to which is caliber size. He didn't imply anything; he made a statement of fact regarding the function of the triggers of an AR style rifle and a Glock pistol. I find it ironic you replied to someone commenting on the limited time he has to get across so much information to an audience that is completely disconnected.

@@sparky14jn triggered?

@@jacobp8294 Great reply and no I don't have an auto sear

@@jacobp8294 ​ Imagine understanding the point of a 4 mins presentation.

I fully agree

I think you’re wrong my friend I believe they know exactly what kind of weapons they are they’re just doing what they’re blatantly saying they’re doing they’re trying to ban the guns all guns why else would you do magazines if you do magazines for a lot of guns most magazines are 15 rounds to 25 round magazines not counting obviously AR platform 30 round magazine why not just band 100 round drums or a 50 round drum instead they’re banning the most common magazines

@@kingxxmeatkingxxmeat9071 I see your point, but I can also see if none of these politicians have never handled or shot a firearm before also. I had a friend tell me that he could feel the power from shooting an AR-15, and I looked at him like he was nuts. I told him to let me know when he shot a .308 or a 7.62x54mm and let me know what he thought then. Hoping that explains why I said what I said :) I absolutely do believe that there is a few with the purposes you have stated though.

You really think these idiots "dont know" about firearms? They are probably more knowledgeable than most BUT they play along with this administration in order to fulfill their commie agenda. I bet eqch amd every one in favor of ban bills actually rely on these weapons for their own safety.

Edit: Had to look some shit up, I guess conversion of M4s to the M4A1 began in 2014, the start of all U.S. Army forces being equipped with the automatic variant. I deployed in 05. We had M4's in the company. I stand corrected. Carry on boys and girls The problem I have with what he is saying, which is good info, is that he starts out in the beginning with false information. I am unsure if he does it out of ignorance or malice, but it is what it is. I was infantry with over 200 combat missions in Baghdad in 05. There are no longer AR rifles issued in the US armed forces that are fully automatic. fully automatic rifles where removed from service in the 70s. All AR/M16 style rifles now have 3 selections in the military, and its 3 round burst, single shot and off. He kept saying it has fully auto, he is fully of shit.

whom?

And who is the freeman and who is the sheep?,, by the way is free man!

@@lolalashy6522 Free man is the exact terminology of the Constitution as written, the sheep are the ones that feelings explain what was written. First would be conservatives/constitutionalist, and the second would be lefty maggots. lefty maggots' are the ones that can't understand there's plenty of 'right of the people' and 'rights' in the constitution-but no where else does it say in exact meaning 'shall not be infringed'.

I want an M4 with selector switch. F semi auto.

It seems Greg Steube stumbled upon a great talking point, ask a Democrat how many of you have served in the military or have first-hand knowledge of weapons.

Dems know nothing about anything

He has every one of his skin-tearing gun sights named and numbered. ooohhh.

I agree with his motives, but he actually listed selector options incorrectly ; He said the three selector options for an M16 are: "fully automatic, three round burst and semi-automatic"... Wrong... The three options are three round burst, semi-automatic and safe. "Automatic" has not been an option since the Vietnam M16 A1 version.

@@Remy4489 I thought he said three round bursts and semi... I don't recall him mentioning safety. But I appreciate the correction if there was one.

They aren't ignorant. It's malice at this point. You can't get taken to school this often and still be stupid.

He doesn't understand either. A gun is a machine that is engineered to do a certain thing. The "look" of the gun is based on it's functionality and anyone saying a handgun and a riffle have the same functionality is an idiot. Do you think a beretta pico and an ar15 have the same functionality?

​@@HoomanPlays No.. they have the same functionality. You pull the trigger, the firing pin hits the primer, and a bullet comes out. The rifle is just built for rounds like 223 Remington. The look of the gun is NOT based on weapon functionality. And before you say "Its made that way to withstand the pressure released when the bullet is fired", there are remington 223 pistols. You might know remington 223 by another name, that name is 5.56 Nato. Exact same bullet by measurement.

@@HoomanPlays In regards to their trigger mechanisms, which is the argument he is going against, yes. Even he knows that a rifle provides a steadier aim at longer distances with benefits to recoil control, stability, and accuracy. That's not what they were arguing about. Is a semi-automatic firearm a "weapon of war" and the only time that's really true is in regard to the M1911 which isn't even in service anymore (from my understanding). Besides he is wrong on one point that he's arguing. We, the people, have the right to weapons of war. Especially considering we're getting to a point where a president made a veiled threat aimed at half the country.

Isn't he misrepresenting the issue though? It's not simply "how they look", the caliber difference is huge and therefore so is the penetration / destructive power.

That's why they shouldn't have anyone over 65 to run for anything

thing is, we assume they don't know, I think they know exactly what they are talking about, But they want these weapons gone so they can keep power, best way to do that, is to confuse the public and straight lie about these weapons

@@justvibes2843 unless they are in a golf cart!😅😅😅😅 Seriously though I agree 👍👍👍👍

@@RenegadeSpider2 no one is confusing the public. The fact that it’s easier to buy a firearm in some states than it is to drink just further proves the point that republicans have their priorities mixed up. An AR-15, an M4, an HK416, all chambered at 5.56 or .300. Should not be handled by your average civilian with no extensive training, background check etc.

@@butter4484 1: we have background checks, I have a sister who was denied due to it, 2: it isn't your business who owns a gun and who don't, we have a thing call the 2nd admendment, and Don't talk and say "they didn't have modern guns in mind" back in the day, muskets were the top gun, muskets were to them what M16's are to us, fact is we can't even own those, so miss me with that bs

Like trump saying he’s the most transparent president but yet he stole classified documents and we still find out he had more hidden. We know they’re both lying.

Yeah that raises a *_lot_* of questions....

She's probably a representative of Chicago

0:35

It battle with the criminals I guess

See Alinski's 8 steps to a controlled society.. osama and hrc worship it as bible.. it is the new left agenda.

Correct, they will buy stock/shares in one company and banned products in another.

WOW!! WOW!! SPOT ON AND NOW YOU SEE HOW THE RATS THE DEMOCRAT RATS HAVE BEEN SLEAZING AROUND THE DIRTBAGS OFF CONGRESS COWARDS TO THE LBTG MARXIST COMMUNIST PROGRESSIVE AND ITS ALL CONTROL BT THE BASTARDS OF THE COMMANDER INN WHIMP AND HIS CORRUPT FAMILY OF LIES DECIET ANDTHE SLEAZY WHITE HOUSE OH SEC HOME LAND SEC TRANS GIVE ME A FKING BREAK CIA FBI HOMELAND BULLSHIT.

They don't care. They want to ban all firearms so that we are easy to control.

I agree with his motives, but he actually listed selector options incorrectly ; He said the three selector options for an M16 are: "fully automatic, three round burst and semi-automatic"... Wrong... The three options are three round burst, semi-automatic and safe. "Automatic" has not been an option since the Vietnam M16 A1 version.

We have that over here in the UK with knives. Any knife that can be opened with just momentum alone is illegal to even own... except you can make one by loosening the screw that fixes the knife to the blade

Like most things they make laws about but have no clue on the subject

They aren't ignorant... it is about power.... we have been having these same arguments for decades now and a lot of these people have been in office for 30+ years.

@@toorimakun So why hasn’t anything been done about this?

​@@user-rr1py7nc6x It goes back and forth.... they ban something.. it gets unbanned... they ban something else. It so far has been impossible to completely stop this BS because too many people that vote just go to the polls and vote for who ever they have seen in the news with their team (R) or (D) next to their name. (and of course the people in the news are all part of the wall street "uniparty" and aren't actually republicans or democrats)

“Weapon of War” A single-fire muzzle loader musket was, and still is in a some countries, a “weapon of war”. It’s just an emotionally-charged buzz word made to advance the gun control debate.

It's a "Impact Statement" now used as a scare tactic.

@@lukeporras1288 so was the m1 grand 😂 so u mean to tell me I can’t have the ping gun🤓

She's from Texas. How the hell did she get elected in Texas?

@@jamescobrien Californian commies moving to Texas...

@@dametalone That makes sense now.

​@@jamescobrien because everyone who left California because of how high it costs to live, moved to Texas/Arizona. They literally turned 2 of the most red states to blue in a couple of years.

she also actually said as stupid as this may sound, "i saw my constituents die in combat" she also said "ar15 are heavy like moving boxes' sheila jackson lee of texas google her many stupid aoc type shit it's so funny you won't believe your ears!

Unfortunately, this is a well-rehearsed stage play -- American liberties are being removed for the new citizens ( illegal immigrants ) and they will get their custom constitution as well that will render them slaves to the self-appointed criminal U.S. Government.

??

Pointless as "these people" are reading scripts. They are all in on it. Nothing EVER gets accomplished that benefits us. Citizens worldwide are becoming disarmed all while global shortages of food, water, electricity, gas, diesel, and deadly weather rage across the planner killing people. Those who can't see what's happening will be the first to die.

??

Not sure generalizations and "maybe" make good debate points.

Exactly!

They don't listen, they don't hear, they don't care. They have their own agenda.

You say that until the same logic is used against the very beliefs you hold so closely Like it or not you need both half’s of the coin to make a dollar one without the other is tyranny

facts

@@TrashDaddy1 but liberals don't use logic.....sooo?

It is easier to find a unicorn than an honest member of congress.

Facts? Well he's wrong about machineguns , you can buy a machinegun today with 0 paperwork they are called "pre ban" for example a fully automatic pre ban Tommy can run around 35k where a semiautomatic one is around 3k Now it different with post ban guns like the ar15 so you can go buy a ar15 for around 1k and a fully automatic trigger pack / other parts for around 1k and the paperwork to register a machinegun is around 200 bucks I think so around 1k for a semiautomatic ar or around 3k for a ar machinegun but you need to register it / keep up a class 3 weapons permit blah blah blah , the Tommy is so expensive because its pre ban theres 0 paperwork dont need a license don't need to register, your paying for anonymity with pre ban guns , but anyone who is not a fellon can do this right now perfectly legally so he was lieing when he said you can't just buy a machingun or these weapons of war are already banned cuz no they aren't thats just plain false

​@@Cold_Cactus 👈😆😆😆

​@@Cold_Cactus I asked about your pre-ban machine gun comment at a gun show. Multiple gun dealers agreed that a pre-ban Tommy Gun could run $35K, but said that the rest (i.e. your reason why) was incorrect. They explained that this was becasue certain parts cannot be manufactured anymore, creating a scarcity, and that (short of becoming a class 3 firearms dealer, or class 2 manufacturer; both requiring lengthy licensing, background checks/approval processes), an ATF Form 4 was required, and is the easiest way for a person to obtain a pre-ban machine gun. They said this is a federal requirement, does not vary by state, and that the ATF Form 4 comes with its own background check, requiring aproval and license transfer. This sounded very different than the associated comment in your post, so I also Googled "can you buy a pre-ban machine gun without any licenses or registration". After reading the first 3-4 results, which all said the same thing as the gun dealers at the gun show, I determined that you must have been mistaken/incorrect in your post. Don't just believe me though. I suggest you do some research of your own to check this out. A quick Google search may be all you need to see the same requirements that I did. Please come back and share if you find different info, as I am truly curious. Thanks!

​@@Cold_Cactus The Price of Machine Guns Believe it or not, the price of a machine gun can be upwards of $20,000 today and is expected to increase every year. Some of the more exclusive models are even more expensive, with an average price tag ranging from $30,000 to $50,000!Mar 13, 2020 Maybe you should do research before proving yourself wrong .

​@@Cold_Cactus Buying a machine gun requires an extensive background check, and while certain firearms - those that fall into the category of Curios & Relics (C&R) guns - can be transferred directly from one owner to another, in most cases this sort of sale requires an actual Class III dealer.Jul 2, 2020

the fact that "only police should have guns" is even a talking point is proof that we are being abused and stripped of our independence more than we already have been.

Smart fella

He wanted every citizen to have unrestricted access to literally every weapon. Including warships, cannons, explosives, machine guns, chemical weapons, etc.

@@websterri Sounds good to me

@@websterri Look at it this way; if it's a weapon too dangerous for the people to own, then it's too dangerous for the government to own. Should civilians own chemical weapons and nukes? Nope. Neither should the government.

This isn’t even 101 it’s baby’s first gun

Yeah don't give them enough credit for being stupid. They're doing it on purpose specifically to ban everything.

It was a super in depth lecture for them. I doubt they even understood half the things he said. Remember these are the "fully semi automatic AR glock 15 with a 50 round magazine clip" guys.

The idiots need to be taught but they are still not listening they are still stuck on their term ASSAULT WEAPON?

This guy trying to say that an ar15 and a handgun is the same thing cos they are semi auto? Lmao what a too 😂 Get rid of ar15s America 🙄🙄 it's sooo incredibly simple

look, i'm not for gun control, but *you* aren't factually correct. he's wrong, m4's aren't fully automatic, I know, I carried one in OIF. All of DC is a joke.

@@Steffystr8mobbin I’m not sure about the military weapons but the semiautomatic civilian weapons he had pictures of are all simply one trigger pull one round. I hate hearing people call a semi automatic weapon an automatic weapon.

@@Steffystr8mobbin some m4 have all 3 mode some don't.

@@georgevaldez1449 Ohhh okay, I've only seen M4's with an automatic setting and a semi-automatic setting. I thought 3-rnd burst was a feature of the M16A1 (or M16A2 I believe) rifles.

@@gavinlee27 George is wrong. All M4 A1 rifles have the selector switch for auto three round burst. Same with the M16 A4 rifles.

Democrats have a gift for that.

Steube made a fool of himself violating Church/State-Separation he proceeded the vote on the Equality Act by reading from Deuteronomy on the Floor of the US House of Representatives. Deut 22:5 addresses Mosaic law against cross-dressing; today we call cross-dressers transvestites. The equality Act addresses trans-SEXUALS. Not only does NO Bible passage have any place being read aloud on the floors of Congress, Deut 22:5 is about trans-VESTITES. Even IF, however, the House was voting on transvestites' rights (They're not subject to Public Accommodation protection because cross-dressing isn't an immutable trait.), what Mosaic law says is irrelevant.

@@rogerclark9285 I mean, if you want to be honest about it, so do Republicans. From attending a gay marriage for his son 3 days after voting against gay marriage to inciting a riot and then running away from it, Republicans have a lot of wacky cognitive distance... Just like Dems.

"Man" should be in quote marks. Dude was definitely running some female software.

@@svalbard01 Nice sexism, bud.

If the highest law of the land was actually upheld 99% of politicians, judges, and law enforcement officers would be found guilty of treason and deprivation of rights under the color of law at a minimum. Both carry the death penalty.

Hasn't happened yet... cause the biggest threat domestically is congress and the federal mafia that has set itself up as demi gods.

Wasn't this guy unfortunately since he is ignoring what the second amendment argues for.

@@LunarKn1ght True. The whole point was the people would have completely unrestricted access to all arms.

@@websterri yes, whatever the government had. The people were to have. So no government here could ever try and put their thumb on the citizens.

Very true. I retired from the Marine Corps in 2012 and have never seen an issue rifle that was full auto. It wasn't until very recently that the US Army and some other combatant commands began purchasing/modifying M4s with full auto capability. A complete waste of function for a service rifle. The M249 and M240B fill that role. You can't hit crap with full auto and you will run out of ammo before the firefight is over, which could last 12 minutes or 12 hours. Depends on CAS or artillery.